Transaction MD01 doesn't planify articles

Hi experts!
I am having some trouble with transaction MD01 in my system: It doesn't planify any article. I have done the following customizing:
- It's supply source is 4
- It has a source list defined with the relevant vendor for the MRP
- The vendor is defined as "Regular Vendor"
- It is in the store's assortment
When I run MD02 the purchase requisition is correctly generated, but it doesn't work with MD01 and MDW1. In customizing, the MRP has the option Activate requirement planning activated.
Do you have any clue why this transaction is not working?
Thank you very much once again.

What is the value for availability check in your material master?
What MRP type do you use?
Do you have a planning file entry > check MD21

Similar Messages

Transaction AFAR doesn't check for authorization

Hi,
I've added transaction code AFAR in one of the role that has Check/Maintain for authorization object A_PERI_BUK which should restrict on company code. Ive even check the associated program RAAFAR00 which has the authority chekc statement.
But, when I restrict the access to a specific company code in the role, the transaction is still allowing the users to execute it with other company codes. User doesn't have any other roles assigned and all the other tcodes such as AFAB, AFBP are giving authorization errors.
Can some one help!!
Regards,
Raghu

Hi,
it is not throwing failed authority check error but should work just fine.
    AUTHORITY-CHECK   OBJECT 'A_PERI_BUK'
                      ID      'AM_ACT_PER'      FIELD con_31
                      ID      'BUKRS'           FIELD x093c-bukrs.
    IF sy-subrc NE 0.
*       WRITE: / text-f08, x093c-bukrs. commented by C5053255
      CONTINUE.
    ELSE.
*      Rücklesen des eingegebenen Geschäftsjahres pro Buchungskreis
      p_gjahr = sav_gjahr.                                  "> 627533
    ENDIF.
CONTINUE statement executed in case of failed authority-check causes loop to skip processing for this item ... so only elements for which user has proper authorizations are processed. Try debugging to confirm
Best regards,
FS

Xa transaction sample doesn't workk

I've tried to work through the java example concerning xa transaction, but it doesn't work.
The program cannot create the resource, a null value is always returned.
Sample code from oracle :
// Create a XADataSource instance
OracleXADataSource ds = new OracleXADataSource();
ds.setURL("jdbc:oracle:thin:@dolphin:1521:TEST");
ds.setUser("sel");
ds.setPassword("poivre");
// get a XA connection
XAConnection xaConn = ds.getXAConnection();
// Get a logical connection
Connection conn1 = xaConn.getConnection();
Xid xid1 = createXid(111,111);
until this everything work but the following get XA Resource doesn't work.
// Get XA resource handle
XAResource res = xaConn.getXAResource();
If someone knows about this, thank you in advance for help.
youcef.

A transaction timeout will not and cannot terminate user code as there
is no Java API for doing so. If you wish the user code to timeout, try
using the "setQueryTimeout()" method on the SQL statement. The WebLogic
JTS will timeout the transaction using another thread and will prevent
any JDBC activity associated with the global transaction from being
commited.
Sincerely,
Charlie Therit
Developer Relations Engineer
BEA Support
hjkuob wrote:
"Dear Support,
We encounter problems with transaction timeout and details as follows:
A swing UI calls a session bean in which a DAO(Data Access Object) is invoked,
In this DAO, it try to invoke a store procedure like following :
dateSource = getTxDataSource();
conn = (Connection)dataSource.getConnection();
cstmt = conn.prepareCall("{call PK_AP_OO_CATCH_UP.P_AP_MAIN(?,?) }");
cstmt.registerOutParameter(...........);
cstmt.execute();
When a irrevalent guy carelessly locked the table , the swing keep running for 5 hours and
the transaction never throws exception ( both JTA and trans-timeout-seconds are set).
I've also survey docments , however, we are not sure about the definition of Container-managed transactions
and Bean-managed transactions. So there are two problems to be solved :
1. How to solve the timeout problem as the sample code above for calling store procedures,
and what kind of transctions it uses according to the definition ?
2. If a normal sql statement is executed as follows , should we declare explicit transaction ( begin and commit) ? %

In UPGRADE from 4.7c to ecc6.0 ME21N Transaction PO doesn't print

Hello Guru's,
Will anyone give answer while upgrading(4.7C to ECC 6.0) in ME21N transction PO doesn't printing. will you provide which OSS will support to rectify the problem.
Full points for the answer.
Regards, PV

Hi,
Can you clear whether you are in the process of upgrading to ECC6 or you have already completed the Upgrade to ECC6 ?
Regards
Suhas

Creating a transaction variant doesn't catch the selection screen

Hi,
I am trying to create a transaction variant for RERAPP transaction, which calls the report RFRERAPP on selection screen 1000.
I have used SHD0, specifying the t. code and a name for a transaction variant, then pressed the "Create" button. the selection screen is displayed, I enter the relevant values for the transaction, and press enter. the system prompts me to create some screen variants, but none of them have fields listed, and none of them is for the screen 1000.
SAP Release 600.
Any hint on the reason behind this behavior?
I found another related, unanswered [topic|Transaction Variant for a standard report without transaction code;

Hi,
I have faced similar problem..
Here is the work around.. Might be useful for you..
1. Create Selection screen variant for report (Modify selection screen 1000 for display/hide in variant maintaince)
2. Then create "parameter Transaction" with report on Transaction START_REPORT
D_SREPOVARI-REPORT = <Your Report Name>
D_SREPOVARI-VARIANT = <Newly created variant>
Nag
Edited by: Naga Mohan Kummara on Dec 31, 2009 10:46 AM
Edited by: Naga Mohan Kummara on Dec 31, 2009 10:49 AM

Preview of Transaction iVew doesn't work

Hi,
I have created a very simple transaction iView to allow users to call transaction SM30 in my BI system from the Portal. I have the iView assigned to a role and everything works fine when I log in as my demo user.
However when I preview the iView as an administrator, the gui loads up the "easy access" menu, not the SM30 transaction code.
- Single signon / user mapping are working correctly; when I preview the iView I can see my admin user has an rfc connection to my BI system
- The admin user has the authorisation in BI to run transaction SM30, in fact once the iView has loaded the easy access menu, I can then manually call the transaction and maintain the required table.
So I can't see this as either a connectivity or an authorisation error. Does anyone have any idea what else I could have missed here??
Thanks,
Sue

Hi Michael,
No, the preview of the page as the administrator does not work either. And I double checked the patch levels with my basis admin - he confirmed that the portal is actually still on patch 18. On my BW system, the SAP_ABA and SAP_BASIS components are patch 17 while SAP_BW is patch 19.
Do you think this is simply a feature of my current patch levels that should be fixed in future versions?
Thanks,
Sue

HT5312 Why doesn't the article say a thing about resetting security questions?

How come the title says something about security question but the article says nothing of the sort?

Search the article for the phrase "You'll be asked to answer" and read the entire paragraph.
(73847)

Transaction iView doesn't appear

Hi all,
I've created a Transaction iView in EP 6.0 connected to a ECC 5.0 system and I've assigned it to a custom Role: My_Role (My_Role -> My_WorkSet -> My_Page -> My_iView).
When I show a preview (as EP system admin) of that iView it works fine, but when I assign My_Role to the simple User I obtain an error into the iView:
com.sap.portal.appintegrator.sap.Transaction::Transaction/WebGuiSSOLayer
If I assign to that user the super_admin_role it works fine.
How can I solve this issue, without assigning to that user the super_admin_role ?
Thank you.
Best regards,
Gianluca Barile

Hi Gianluca,
looks like you have got a problem with permissions there. Check if you have given end user permission for your custom role to iView and system object that is used by the iView.
Best regards,
Martin

Transaction SHDB doesn't launch my program

Hello,
I would like to do a batch input for my program by recording user actions with SHDB.
Unfortunately, after having created a new recording in SHDB, when I click on "Start recording", the tcode I give in parameter isn't launched, although it works well with other programs (standard or custom).
My program has a standard HR selection screen and fill an ALV grid as output.
Why isn't SHDB able to work with my program?
Thank you in advance.
François

Hello François,
As far as i understand, you want to record an interactive ALV, is it?
Plz see the following link:
You cannot record an ALV.
BR,
Suhas
Hello Suhas,
Thank you for your answer and the link. So unfortunately, it is not possible to record an ALV
I will deal with this.

PPCI transaction doesn't work perfectly....WHY??

Hi experts!!!
I'm following the steps of OMINFOTYPES docuemntation that I've found in this forum, but transaction PPCI doesn't work, I've created the structure of my new infotype and the table associated to this HRI, after I execute PPCI transaction, and I only received a message, that say... "Infotype 9010 cannot be created. Please look at the following log" and then it shows me the log and I don't have created PT9010 structure, either table HRPT9010, HRP9010 created in the database, Modulpoool....etc,.
Can anybody explain me why I need to use PPCI transaction? Is this working properly?
thanlks a lot,
Regards
rebeca

Hello Rebeca.
I'm getting exactly the same message in PPCI (ECC 6.0)
Were you able to solve PPCI problem?
Thank you,
Irina

Use enhacement M61X0001 for MD01

I want to use the enhancement M61X0001 for MRP controller wise planning for the transaction MD01.
i create a proyect in cmod an activate this.
I have written the example code in both the includes (ZXM61U02,ZXM61U01) of 2 EXIT_SAPLM61C_001 & EXIT_SAPMM61X_001.After activating the enhancement through the project the desired effect is not showing.
If I put breakpoint in the coding of the includes of FMs program doesn't stop at the breakpoint.
the sap help, explain that i can use this enhacement =S
   Any suggestion !!!!

Hi Latish,
Yes, i sure because in the sap help said that we can use that enhancement, also in the md01 in the program associated with this i found the sentence
call customer-function...
   and when i click that sentence this go through the code of the function EXIT_SAPMM61X_001
   for this reason i don't understand what are happing ??

Solution Database search option doesn't work

Hi,
Iu2019m working withSAP Solution Manager 7.0 (SID=SMG) is at SP 17.
SAP_BASIS 700 0016 SAPKB70016 SAP Basis Component
SAP_ABA 700 0016 SAPKA70016 Cross-Application Component
ST-PI 2005_1_700 0006 SAPKITLQI6 SAP Solution Tools Plug-
In
PI_BASIS 2006_1_700 0006 SAPKIPYM06 Basis Plug-In
(PI_BASIS) 2006_1_700
SAP_BW 700 0018 SAPKW70018 SAP NetWeaver BI 7.0
SAP_AP 700 0013 SAPKNA7013 SAP Application Platform
BBPCRM 500 0012 SAPKU50012 BBPCRM
BI_CONT 703 0011 SAPKIBIIQ1 Business Intelligence Content
ST 400 0017 SAPKITL427 SAP Solution Manager Tool
CPRXRPM 400 0009 SAPK-40009INCPRXRPM SAP
xRPM/cProjects/cFolders 4.00 (ABAP)
ST-A/PI 01K_CRM560 0000 - Application Servicetools for
CRM 500 510
ST-ETP 100 0000 - Extended tracability package
ST-ICO 150_700 0015 SAPK-1507FINSTPL SAP Solution Manager
Implementation Cont
ST-SER 700_2008_1 0004 SAPKITLOO4 SAP Solution Manager
Service Tools
Service Desk is working, and I'd like use solution database option. So
I've done whole configurations and their work fine.
- I've created a support message logging at solman_workcenter
transaction.
- Using this support message and SAP Tutor delivered at
service.sap.com/rkt-solman I've created a solution database.
- I've logged at CRMC_SAF_TOOL TA->I've marked all checkbox->Check
button->goto->index
(http://solutionmanager.servicesap.grupotec.es:8002/sap
(bD1lcyZjPTAxMA==)/bc/bsp/sap/crm_ei_cmp_admn/default.htm) and I've
indexed the problem/solution just created following SAP Tutor.
- If I log on at is01 TA and I view the problem(24)/solution(500000000019)
just indexed
The problem is that when I'm at crm_dno_monitor TA->select a support
message(8000001233)->edit view->Transaction Data area->Solution
Database tab->
I press button "Search SDB"->so a popup opens "Problem Search Criteria"
titled->and I'm not able to find any results I type words(dump, mara,
table, reboot)
these words appear at problem/solution description, I type these word
at - with ANY of the words:, - with ALL of the words:, - WITHOUT the
words: but
I haven't hit at the search. At this same pop-up I fill Reference-
>Problem number field and I type: 24, a hilist appears with the
problem/solution just created but when I press button continue it
doesn't insert the hit at the support message solution database table.
I've followed SAP Note 331109 but transaction IS02 doesn't exists.
The service connection to Solution Manager is opened and access data
(user solmanadm) is maintained too.
Please, could you help me?
Thanks and Regards,
Raul.

Problem solved using TA crm_saf_tool->index->check

Creation of PR with MD01

Hi,
Somebody knows if exists some parameter that allows the grouping creation of PR with transaction MD01? In my customer, the MD01 creates one PR for each material
Thank you!

Dear !!!!!
I think the Possible Entry u can Make Individual/ Collective requirement = 2 Collective in MRP4
Also if you want all requirement to get add monthly or by weekly then it can be get instead through lot size
As in yours cases you want monthly then make MB in MRP1 view .Keep lot size MB.
This will create only one PR for the entire month.
Revert Back!!!!!
With Regards
Pushpalas
Edited by: pushpalas on Oct 1, 2011 2:29 PM
Edited by: pushpalas on Oct 1, 2011 2:36 PM

Performance problem with transaction log

We are having some performance problem in SAP BW 3.5 system running on MS SQL server 2000.The box is sized 63,574 MB. The transaction logs gets filled up after loading data in to a transactional cube or after doing selective deletion. The size of the transaction log is 7,587MB currently.
Basis team feels that when performing either loading or selective deletion, SQL server views it as a single transaction and doesn't commit until every record is written. And so as a result, transaction logs fills up ultimately bringing the system down.
The system log shows a DBIF error during the transaction log fill up as follows:
Database error 9002 at COM
> [9002] the log file for database 'BWP' is full. Back up the
> Transaction log for the database to free up some log space.
Function COMMIT on connection R/3 failed
Perform rollback
Can we make changes to Database to make commit action frequently? Is there any parameters we could change to reduce the packet size? Is there some setting to be changed in SQL server?
Any Help will be appreciated.

if you have disk space avialable you can allocate more space to the transaction log.

Ora 02290 when using qms_transaction_mgt and autonomous transactions

Hi all,
I'm using the qms procedures:
qms_transaction_mgt for openeing and closing transactions.
Somewhere in my procedure when the transaction is opened i call another procedure which contains a autonomous transaction.
The next time qms_transaction_mgt.close_transaction is called i get an ORA-02290: check constraint (HST65.QMS_NEED_TO_CLOSE_TRANSACTION) violated
When i debug the qms_transaction_mgt.close transaction the g_current_trans_id variable is empty, which indicates the transaction is allready closed.
When i remove the pragma autonomous_transaction statement and the commit statement from the procedure i call, the problem is resolved.
Version information:
Designer 9.0.2 with a with a Oracle 9i 9.2 database and Headstart 9i.
Does anybody know how i can resolve this or if this is a bug and how to fix it?
Thanks,
Yvon

Ian, Yvon,
It is unfortunately a know restriction that the CDM RuleFrame component of both Headstart for Designer 6i and Headstart for Designer 9i doesn't work in combination with autonomous transactions.
The reason is that the RuleFrame administration relies on information stored in 1. pl/sql package variables and 2. database tables. Using autonomous transactions (that involve CDM RuleFramed DML) causes this information to dissynchronize.
A year ago I investigated the possibilities to make autonomous transactions possible with RuleFrame but unfortunately this is fundamental problem: RuleFrame wants to combine multiple DML-actions into one logical transaction (gards this with the "need_to_close_transaction" constraint), while autonomous transactions intend to to the opposite: commit a part of a transaction while the rest of the transaction still is posted/not committed.
There is one exception: if you call an atonomous procedure that does DML on a non-ruleframe-enabled table (no TAPI triggers that intend to open/close the transaction, no CAPI etc), everything functions.
Problem explanation:
====================
1. Outer transaction is opened (by front end or TAPI triggers of first DML)
2. DML takes place
3. Autonomous transaction-procedure is called
4. Auto-transaction again tries (and succeeds!) to open the transaction, it doesn't see that the transaction is opened (db table qms_transactions is empty for the autonomous transaction on query)
5. DML within auto-transaction is posted
6. Auto-transaction closes transaction
7. Auto-transaction is committed
8. Outer transaction thinks the transaction is already closed, because the auto-transaction cleaned out the package variables when it closed the transaction.
9. Commit of the outer transaction fails as the deferred check constraint need_to_close_transaction avoids this to happen (rollback takes place because of this violation).
Hope this helps
Kind Regards
Marc Vahsen
Headstart Team Oracle NL

Transaction MD01 doesn't planify articles

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for