Transaction ME9E - Printing Single Line Schedule Agreement

We are trying to print a line item that has a different delivery address than that of the header. This is a single line document and the address is different. The problem we have is when the scheduling agreements has only one part number and the delivery address for the part number is different then the default company/plant address. This process is predominant when you have subcontract process. We are unable to print the address at the line level for a single line document but system does this correctly and prints this delivery address when there are two part numbers in scheduling agreement. How can we get this to work for us for single item documents? This is critical for our end user. We need to have the system access the text element ITEM_DELADDRESS in the MAIN window and not produce the address in the HEADER_DELADDRESS element in the CONSGNEE window.

Hello,
There are two possible status for schedule lines:
        1- Fixed schedule lines : System doesn't change these schedule lines upon MRP run
        2 Non fixed schedule lines : during MRP run, system deletes these schedule lines and creates new ones.
To make a schedule line fixed there are two possibilities:
                    1- User set manually the indicator fixed schedule line in transaction ME38
                    2- Schedule line lies within the firm period.
The firm period :
For each schedule agreement you can define the firm zone :
1- ME32L change schedule agreement
2- select the item then in toolbar> Item> More function-->additional data Scheduling control
enter the firm zone "number of days".
If schedule line lies whithin this zone system will kepp it and create new line for additional requirement
Best Regards

Similar Messages

Version wise print out of Scheduling Agreement

Hi,
Client uses scheduling agreement extensively. One SA per annum per vendor is maintained as a policy. A number of items are included almost on a weekly basis. Some times, they miss to take the print out of say version 10 and currently the version is say 15. In some cases, this print out of version 10 might be lost in transit.
Now, user wants to take the print out of version 10 alone. Currently, the print out is designed such that the latest version (15) only can be printed with the corresponding change alone (or) the total SA can be printed including details as per current version (15).
We can not ask them to send the total SA print out as it runs into pages.
Please advise how can I take the print out of SA for version 10 alone, in the above case.
Thanks & Regards,
Siva

Take the help from ABAPer and give your requirment to print the tax at item level.

Transaction MM60 printing multiple lines for the same information

Transaction MM60 is printing the same information multiple times, meaning that the same materail is printing multiple times with the exact same information. Any ideas why?

It IS showing duplicate lines. The columns that I'm showing are:
Material
Plant
Val. Type
Material Description
Last Change
MTyp
Matl Group
Unit of measure
Purchasing group
ABC indicator
MRPType
Valuation Class
Price Control Indicator
Price
Currency
Price Unit
Created by
Every single field is identical and each material contains exactly eight rows of identical information. The interesting thing is that if I actually enter a material number, only one line shows (which is correct.) However, if I leave the material number blank and enter the material type, that's when we get multiple lines.
Any other ideas?

Print out of Schedule Lines & Material reqt at subcontractor end.

Hi experts,
Presently we are using ME9E report for taking print out of scheduling agreement. In scheduling agreement, material wise / date wise R.M requirement at Subcontractor end is displayed as well as schedule lines material wise / date wise is displayed.
We do not find it user friendly. We are searching for following reports :
1. Datewise / Material wise requirement of R.M at subcontractor end should be displayed separately.
2. Schedule line qty date wise / material wise should be displayed separately.
Solutions / Suggestions will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
( Rajneesh Gulati )

hi,
pl go with Y program

Scheduling Agreement with print out

Hello
I created one Scheduling agreement for vendor A1 and created schedule lines .
in header Data of this Scheduling agreement i have mentioned the Invoicing party is B1
when i take the print out of Invoicing document the Vendor A1 disply , it is not taking the Invoicing party B1 i print out
i have defined in Patrner in that who is supplier, order , and who is invoicing party
that's$why iam search the header data of Scheduling agreement in that i got invoicing party is B1 is there, still in print out i got wrong vendor no why?
one thing is
this B1 is not defined for perticular Purchasing org, i ahve searched in LFM1 table, is this the reason
i have searched the out put determination for date 14.06.2007 here only partner is A1 is this a reason, shall we define the invoicing party in output determination
totaly i want the name of invoicing party in print out
regards
sapman

Hi,
the partner functions only store the data (i.e. addresses etc.) and make it available for the print program.
You have to code the print program to get it to use the correct vendor for the addresses etc.
The invoicing party address is not normally referenced on the scheduling agreement prints because this si the address that the payment is made to and the address that sends the invoice to you. Why woukld you print the vendors invoice address or name on the scheduling agreement? It is the OA (Ordering Address) that is relevant for the print of the scheduling agreement or schedules.
So why would you print the invoicing vendor's details on a scheduling agreement print out?
Steve B

Header text not printed for scheduling agreement

Hi All,
I have issue with header text print out for scheduling agreement (SA).
In SA when I am manually writing some note and then taking print out, system is giving me correct output with maual note.
I have one standard text (ST) which I need to be printed in evry SA, so in SPRO I created new head text for vendor and in copying rule for text for SA, I created linkage of SA header text with Vendor head text.
In vendor master, I inserted ST in newly created vendor header text.
So now when ever I create new SA for vendor system will determin header text from vendor master.
Now after creating SA when I check the SA, I am able to my ST in SA, but at the time of print out this ST in not printing.
Please let me know what could be the reson.
Regards,
Sameer

I dont understand about what you mean by expand.
When you a print PO, PO text (header or item) it will check to the configuration setting.
The system didnt care if its adopted from vendor master or info record, or whatever you make in the copying rule.
In your case : you create a standard text then it get copied into PO , then you set the standard text to the PO for print out, example the standard text : word is
"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
Then in the PO the text appear will be like below(the same, because it get copied)
"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
If you configure it in define text for SA, then it the print out it will also (the same)
"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
So what text need to expand?

ME33L transaction : Scheduled Agreements

Hello,
1. In the ME33L transaction when you enter the scheduled agreement number you get the items of that particular agreement.If you now select the item and click on ITEM POSITION (shift+f6) the <b><u>validity periods</u></b> will be displayed for that particular item.
2. Now if u go to the menubar and select item->price simulation you will get the net value of that item.
3. Now i want a function module which will give me the validity periods when i pass the agreement data.
4. One more function module is required to get the price for this validity period.
Regards,
Sandeep

hello Sandeep Kusuma
Validity periods for Scheduling Agreements find you in table A016. When u have our record from table EKPO read A016 with the keys a016-evrtn = ekpo-evrtn and a016-evrtp = ekpo-evrtp.
The price for actual validity period found you in table ekpo.
Regards: y0sh1

Problem Regarding TABLE updation for Scheduling Agreement

Dear Experts,
We have noticed that whenever we are releasing any Delivery Schedule for a line item against a Scheduling Agreement the table field ABART(Scheduling Agreement Release Type) in table EKET is not getting updated,but the same field or column in TABLE EKEH or EKEK is getting updated.
Please advice what is the problem and how to resolve the same.
Regards,
Soumick

Hi,
The scheduling agreement schedule line is not firmed physically:The fixing indicator (EKET-FIXKZ) is empty for this schedule line.
This can be checked in Transaction ME39 or with Transaction SE16 for table EKET for the corresponding schedule line.
In the MRP group of the corresponding material, it is set that only transferred scheduling agreement schedule lines should be regarded as firmed (Transaction OPPR, firming scheduling agreement, Firm transmSLines [Field XFAT1]).
In this case, only such scheduling agreement schedule lines are firmed which were transferred by message transmission through purchasing to the vendor. (see also the F1 help for the field).
However, the system displays all scheduling agreement schedule lines as fixed in Transaction MD04 within the release period and assigns them with a star ('*'), that is, this applies also scheduling agreement schedule lines with a transmitted quantity of 0.
In contrast to the above, these schedule lines are not displayed as fixed in Transaction MD05 or in the planning with 'Display result'.
Note 354164 explains this system behavior.
For the planning, the transmitted quantity is considered as fixed if this is correspondingly set in the MRP group of the material.
If the transmitted quantity was updated correctly, it should be contained in field AMENG of table EKET.
By using Transaction SE16 for this table and the corresponding schedule line (scheduling agreement number EBELN, item EBELP, schedule line ETENR), you should be able to find out....
transmitted quantity was written to the database and a fixing can be carried out correspondingly in amount of the transmitted quantity or whether no update of the transmitted quantity occurred (see below Notes 82169, 117093, 134356).
Solution
First, the system behaves as intended.
It should be checked whether the function, which is controlled by this indicator, is actually wanted this way (to firm only scheduling agreement schedule lines which actually have been transferred).
In addition, problems can occur in purchasing when the printed quantity is updated (AMENG).This symptom can especially occur after you have upgraded from a release < Release 4.0A to a release > Release 4.0B.
In this regard, see the related Notes 82169, 117093 and 134356.
Regards,
Udaya.

Scheduling Agreement: Planning in Frozen Period

Hi,
as you know you can set 2 fixed periods for scheduling agreements and configure SAP to create fixed or non fixed schedule lines inside the period.
Do you know if there is anyway to configure the system in order to prevent it to create new schedule lines inside this period?
I explain better: we define a contract with the vendor and enstablish that there is a frozen period of 90 days, meaning that from here to 90 days your delivery schedule can't change in any way. Therefore i set the first fixed period of SA to 90 days and tell the system to create fixed schedule lines in that time interval, so they won't be changed. But if a new requirement in the past or within the 90 days comes out and the MRP runs with automatic schedule lines creation enabled, then i get more fixed schedule lines in the past and contractual parameters are violated.
Any way to prevent this?
Thanks and best regards

Hi,
Thanks for all your replies, mentioned settings are already maintained and I did check all the queques for any error.
OLTP transfer setting is also maintained as immediate..so I don't need to transfer change pointers through report, as it should immediately be transferred to ECC.
My question is: We have report - create release (transaction - /SAPAPO/PWBSCH1) to release scheduling agreement, so I believe for scheduling agreement we need to use above transaction.
It seems to work, as I can see IDOC but its in failed status.
I have following question:
- Does scheduling line release work in a different way than purchase req, in APO. I did test with purchase req and it was immediately transferred to ECC.
Has somebody worked for schedule agreement scenario in APO?
Any insights would be appreciated.
Thanks
Sharad

Scheduling agreement planning in APO

Hi,
Currently I am planning in APO (SCM 5.1) and have scheduling agreement (type - APO Sch. Agree.)
Planning run created - Schedule lines and using transaction - /SAPAPO/PWBSCH1, create release.
Then I went to external procurement master data and clicked on SA release and executed Schedule line.
I could see it green.
But if I check ECC, I don't see Schedules lines in agreement.
Do let me know if I am missing any steps or any configuration which I might have missed.
In the "Partner" tab within external procurement master data, I changed medium to "XML" and can see one failed IDOC.
How scheduling lines are released from APO to ECC? is it not standard "pulbication of planning result"
Thanks
Sharad

Hi,
Thanks for all your replies, mentioned settings are already maintained and I did check all the queques for any error.
OLTP transfer setting is also maintained as immediate..so I don't need to transfer change pointers through report, as it should immediately be transferred to ECC.
My question is: We have report - create release (transaction - /SAPAPO/PWBSCH1) to release scheduling agreement, so I believe for scheduling agreement we need to use above transaction.
It seems to work, as I can see IDOC but its in failed status.
I have following question:
- Does scheduling line release work in a different way than purchase req, in APO. I did test with purchase req and it was immediately transferred to ECC.
Has somebody worked for schedule agreement scenario in APO?
Any insights would be appreciated.
Thanks
Sharad

SAP best practice on scheduling agreements

Hello all,
Our client is an automotive supplier and currently in the SAP environment we use spot POs for indirect purchasing (thru SRM) and scheduling agreement for direct procurement. The scheduling agreements have multiple lines and we try to process as much invoices as ERS as possible.
Currently some of the business units are proposing to have single line items in the SA rather than the multiple ones. The reason being huge no of SA lines being faxed and also supposing it to be a SAP suggested best practice to have ONLY one line item per SA.
I am not sure of any such best practice. Could you please help me with an single Vs multi line scheduling agreements pros and cons. Also what is the best practice that are seen in the automotive sector or being suggested by SAP.
Any SAP official documentation in the public domain will also help.
Thanks

As per my experience, we have used both the ways, both have its pro's and cons.
In one instance we may feel that it is easy to handle one line per one SA and in that way we will create many SA's and in ither instance we may fell having one SA for multiple lines.
SAP does not give any best approach...or else SAP woul dhave provided the option for only one line.
As per my experience the Structuring of a SA should be based on the way you procure from the supplier / Vendor.
We have one supplier who supplies 800+ materials, we can create one SA with 800 lines... But we have created multiple SA's based on the product category whcih is a bit easy to identify whcoih material goes into which SA and the Vendor is also happy as he knows that for one product there is a specific SA.
Hope this helps you in resolving your issue.,

BAPI for fetching the list of scheduling agreements

This is my first post in SDN Forums so pardon me if I commit a mistake.
My question is: Is there a standard BAPI for fetching a list of scheduling agreements?
I know that there are BAPIs for creating and maintaining scheduling agreements like BAPI_SAG_CREATE and BAPI_SAG_CHANGE and iBAPI_SAG_GETDETAIL but each of these require the scheduling agreement number. My requirement is to list out all the scheduling agreements that are present in the system.
I found a BAPI named BAPI_DOCUMENT_GETLIST and BAPI_DOCUMENT_GETLIST2 but I'm not able to find out what documents it is able to display. If I don't specify any selection criteria, it is fetching just two records of document type DRW. No other document of any other type is fetched.
Another BAPI that I found was BAPI_SALESORDER_GETLIST in which if I specify the Transaction group as "3" (for scheduling agreement), it fetches them but those are related to Sales orders and not purchase orders.
So, if anyone has any info and can help me out, I would really appreciate it.
Edited by: rkarthea on Jul 30, 2010 10:44 AM

Hi Raj,
As I had said earlier, I need the Scheduling agreements related to purchase orders and not sales orders. The ones in EKKO table (Doc category: L).Will this program fetch this info?
Also, I need a Java app (that's being developed) to fetch this info, so I'm looking for a BAPI. Is there any or can this program (if it fetches the right Scheduling agreements) be called from an external Java app?

Scheduling agreement ( Pur. doc. Type LPA) does not get updated in MEI1

We have a requirement that, purchasing documents ( POs and Scheduling Agreements) needs to be updated when there is change in price in purchasing info record. We have made configurations to activate the change pointers on pricing conditions and they are working fine. To update the price in purchasing documents following process is used.
1.     Transaction MEI4 u2013 Create work list
2.     Transaction MEI3 u2013 Recompilation of document index.
3.     Transaction MEI1 u2013 Changes to purchasing documents due to changes in conditions.
After running MEI1, price is updated only in purchasing documents and the update does not take place in scheduling agreement. Does anyone one know what things may be missing? Or is this a SAP transaction issue?

Hi
If scheduling agreement has time dependent conditions it will not update. You need to remove time dependent tick from document type definition config.(spro>MM>purchasing>scheduling agreement>define document type)
remove tick mark it will update.
Regards
Antony

Cumulative Quantities in Scheduling Agreement

Hi All
Can anyone tell me how this works with *** quantites, we have always ran from receipts. However, if we choose inbound deliveries does that mean when we send releases the YTd receipt + open Inbound deliveries will be sent as the YTD *** values to our vendor.
Our company is looking for something with intransit values as part of our cums. How does this affect our *** requirements if this is changed?
Regards,
Krisjohn

I'm new to 862 (Shipping Schedule) iDocs and I'm having a problem with the dates/quantities during the update processing. We are receiving an inbound 862 and we run the transaction BD87 to update a Scheduling Agreement. BD87 processes without any errors. When we check the Scheduling Agreement, we expect the Forecast Delivery Schedule dates/quantities to be updated, but the JIT Delivery Schedule dates/quantities are being updated instead. How do I determine which dates/quantities are to be updated with my inbound data?
Any assistance is greatly appreciated!

Scheduling agreements with LPA

Guys,
could you please let me know what are the settings necessary for LPA SA's with MRP run.......
I would really appreciate your quick response.
Thanks
Raghu

Hi,
SA must be clearly designated as a source of supply for MRP in the source list (MRP indicator 2)
The procurement indicator F (external procurement) must have been set in the MRP data of the material master record.
Automatic scheduling agreement delivery schedules must be permitted in the planning run. The automatic schedule lines (scheduling agreements) indicator determines whether or not the system generates SA delivery schedule lines in the opening horizon only or in the planning horizon during the planning run.
Reward if useful
Chandru

Transaction ME9E - Printing Single Line Schedule Agreement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for