ME33L transaction : Scheduled Agreements

Hello,
1. In the ME33L transaction when you enter the scheduled agreement number you get the items of that particular agreement.If you now select the item and click on ITEM POSITION (shift+f6) the validity periods will be displayed for that particular item.
2. Now if u go to the menubar and select item->price simulation you will get the net value of that item.
3. Now i want a function module which will give me the validity periods when i pass the agreement data.
4. One more function module is required to get the price for this validity period.
Regards,
Sandeep

hello Sandeep Kusuma
Validity periods for Scheduling Agreements find you in table A016. When u have our record from table EKPO read A016 with the keys a016-evrtn = ekpo-evrtn and a016-evrtp = ekpo-evrtp.
The price for actual validity period found you in table ekpo.
Regards: y0sh1

Similar Messages

Schedule Agreements (ME33L Transaction)

Hello ,
1. In the schedule agreements (ME33L Transaction) after you give the agreement number the agreement items are displayed.
2.When u select the item and press shift+f6 u get the item conditions i.e the validity period.
3. I want a function module which does the same so that when i give a purchase doct., i should get these validity periods (item conditions )
Regards
Sandy

Hey,
There may or may not be a standard function to retreive the data.
You can either debug the program and find the function or you can use sql trace(ST05) to find the table accessed by the ME33L. The trace will give you the list of tables and you can write your own function to retrieve the data.
-Kiran

IDOCs information for Scheduling agreement ME33L - MM

Hi all,
I need to get the idoc information for the scheduling agreement process which takes place through ME31L transaction.
Can you please tell me 1) how can i get the IDOC information like the segments etc used. for SA process?
2) how to get the inbound delivery idoc information containing the item details?
3) how to get the idoc information for the goods movement which takes place through GR?
Thank you.

Hi,
I am new to IDOCS.
i suppose when the Schedule agreement is being processed, some idocs might be getting generated or triggered to send details. So i want the information about this idocs. Like i want to know what would be the segments etc. that the idoc would be carrying.
I am not able to figure out how can i check for this.

Transaction ME9E - Printing Single Line Schedule Agreement

We are trying to print a line item that has a different delivery address than that of the header. This is a single line document and the address is different. The problem we have is when the scheduling agreements has only one part number and the delivery address for the part number is different then the default company/plant address. This process is predominant when you have subcontract process. We are unable to print the address at the line level for a single line document but system does this correctly and prints this delivery address when there are two part numbers in scheduling agreement. How can we get this to work for us for single item documents? This is critical for our end user. We need to have the system access the text element ITEM_DELADDRESS in the MAIN window and not produce the address in the HEADER_DELADDRESS element in the CONSGNEE window.

Hello,
There are two possible status for schedule lines:
        1- Fixed schedule lines : System doesn't change these schedule lines upon MRP run
        2 Non fixed schedule lines : during MRP run, system deletes these schedule lines and creates new ones.
To make a schedule line fixed there are two possibilities:
                    1- User set manually the indicator fixed schedule line in transaction ME38
                    2- Schedule line lies within the firm period.
The firm period :
For each schedule agreement you can define the firm zone :
1- ME32L change schedule agreement
2- select the item then in toolbar> Item> More function-->additional data Scheduling control
enter the firm zone "number of days".
If schedule line lies whithin this zone system will kepp it and create new line for additional requirement
Best Regards

Scheduling Agreement Item not reflected as commitment item in CO

HI SAP MM Gurus,
Good day!
Here is my scenario:
We need to create scheduling agreements with Account Assignment F which needs to have the commitment items reflected upon creation of the delivery schedule. This works ok if I create the documents (Scheduling Agreement and Delivery Schedule) manually, with the field EKPO-XOBLR being set to X to have the items pass through to CO
The problem is, due to the volume of documents processed, we need to create an upload program using the function module BAPI_SAG_CREATE. Upon observation, this does not update the commitments for the shceduling agreement items even though both the scheduling agreement and delivery schedule were created.
Any thoughts on how I can resolve this?
Kind regards,
DeLo

Are u sure the transaction code is ME33L, contracts use ME33K
Now this is tricky.
One way of finding the condition table used is (working backwards)...
go to table KONH
in the field VAKEY enter your contract(10 chars as in EKKO/EKPO w/ leading zeroes or trailing spaces) and contract line(5 chars w/ leading zeroes).
look at KVEWE (A in my case) and KOTABNR (16 in my case) used now join the two (A016 add the zero in between) now this is the condition table.
working forward.
if the condition table is A016
Get A016-KNUMH from A016
A016-KAPPL = 'M'
A016-KSCHL = 'PB00' (condition you are looking for)
A016-EVRTN = Your Contract Number
A016-EVRTP = Your Contract Line Number
Select DATAB (Validity Start Date), DATBI (Validity End Date) from KONH
where KNUMH EQ A016-KNUMH
Cheers!
Rishi

Perform Post Goods Receipt Against Scheduling Agreement

Dear all,
I've weird problem here. This is concering GR against Scheduling Agreement. I've a "LPA" type Scheduling Agreement and all the delivery schedule maintained and schedule line released successfully in ME38.
When I do GR via MIGO by entering the Scheduling Agreement #, a prompt was given with no items selected. Note: My schedule line delivery date = GR posting date.
What I did was, inside MIGO I go to Settings | Default Values and check on "Propose All Items". Finally, the affected line item appears but with "blank" quantity. So, I key in the actual quantity per the released schedule line and complete the GR posting successfully.
Question 1: Why do I need to perform the MIGO propose all items setting? Normal PGR against PO doesn't require this.
Question 2: Is this a standard SAP behavior or I'm doing PGR - scheduling agreement process the wrong way?
Appreciate any expert clarification.
Thanks in advance.
Steven

Hi Jurgen,
I've read Notes 493404 and I'm facing Question 10
10. Question:
For the goods receipt for the scheduling agreement the system displays error M7 064: "Document xx does not contain any selectable items".
Answer:
A possible reason is that the document is subject to a release strategy and has yet to be released. You can check this using transaction ME33 and release it subsequently if necessary.
Another reason can be that although a confirmation control key that contains a confirmation category with GR assignment has been maintained for the scheduling agreement item, this category has yet to be confirmed. You can check this using transactions ME33 and OMGZ. If necessary, create the relevant confirmation.
Another reason may be that no undelivered schedule line exists up to the posting date. If nevertheless you want to post the GR, you can use transaction ME38 to bring the next schedule line date forward, or in transaction MB01 you can select the "Suggest Zero Lines" field or in transaction MIGO the "Propose All Items" field under Settings - Default values.
From the snapshot of the notes 493404 above:
1. I don't have a release strategy for the scheduling agreement. Have checked via ME33L
2. I didn't implement any confirmation control in the scheduling agreement. Have checked via ME33L
3. I've a delivery schedule line up to the posting date. In my scenario, schedule line date = GR posting date
Therefore, I'm still truly puzzle with the system behavior. Any further help will be most appreciated.
Thanks.
Steven

Scheduling Agreement flagged for deletion

Hi
Once a scheduling agreement has been archived it is no longer visible from transaction ME33L, but can be viewed with Read program RM06ER30.
When a scheduling agreement was flagged for deletion with the Pre-Processing program RM06EV47 it has not been archived yet, although a message stipulates that it has. ME33L is possible, but ME32L is not allowed.
The particular scheduling agreement in question was flagged because it complied to the residence time configurations BUT business now want s it back (even though the lack of maintenance on their side caused the document to be flagged for deletion)
How do we 'unflag' a scheduling agreement and take it back to its original state where it can be changed again?
Your help will be appreciated
Thanks

Hi Jurgen
I am waiting for authorization on MEMASSPO.
In the interim, I noticed that field LOEKZ contains the value L.
I further notice that MEMASSPO is mass maintenance for Purchase Orders. Will I be able to only select one scheduling agreement to unflag?
And lastly I noticed on our Dev environment that there are no variants created in the system. Where will I do this from?
Thank you

How to modify item quantity in an scheduling agreement

Hi,
I'm trying to modify target quantity (ekpo-ktmng) in an item of a scheduling agreement (you can see it in me33l transaction).
When the users tries to modify, using me33l, the quantity of an item in an scheduling agreement, I need to pick this value (ktmng) and modify it according to some rules.
To catch the value I use EXIT_SAPMM06E_016 user-exit, and when the user modifies a value in the i_ekpo register of the user exit I see the new value that the user introduced. But I need to put a new value and it isn't enough with modifying this structure (i_ekpo).
So I think in a bapi, first of all I've tried with BAPI_PO_CHANGE but I receive the following error:
"Not possible to process a scheduling agreement using this function"
How can I change the target quantity of an item in a scheduling agreement?
thanks in advance

Thanks for your reply, I'm trying with the following piece of code:
DATA: w_ekko TYPE ekko,
      t_ekpo TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF ekpo WITH HEADER LINE,
     t_ekpo2 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF ekpo WITH HEADER LINE,
START-OF-SELECTION.
SELECT SINGLE * INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF w_ekko
FROM ekko
WHERE ebeln = '5500000001'.
SELECT * INTO TABLE t_ekpo
FROM ekpo
WHERE ebeln = '5500000001'.
t_ekpo2[] = t_ekpo[].
READ TABLE t_ekpo2 INDEX 1.
t_ekpo2-ktmng = '69'.
MODIFY t_ekpo2 INDEX 1.
CALL FUNCTION 'ME_UPDATE_AGREEMENT_PO'
    EXPORTING
      i_ekko_new       = w_ekko
I_EKKO_OLD       =
I_LOGSY          =
    TABLES
XEKBES           =
      xekpo            = t_ekpo
   YEKPO            = t_ekpo2
XSVAB            =
But I receive a dump from SAP.
In t_ekpo I put all the items of the scheduling agreement, the I modify one of the (first) and store it in t_ekpo2, but I'm not very sure of this is the good way of working.
Any help would be very appreciated.
Thanks again

Unable to generate a JIT schedule on a Vendor Schedule agreement using ME38

Hi,
I am having a problem generating a JIT schedule on a Vendor Schedule agreement using ME38
The message I get is 'Error generating release against scheduling agreement (cause 2)'
Yet when I use ME33L I can see the output under Header>Messages.
Any help gratefully appreciated...
Robin

Robin,
ME38 is to Maintain schedule lines. In ME38 Select line item and press 'Delivery Schedule' or 'F2' to see the schedule lines. Maintain the schedule line here.
ME84 is the transaction to generate JIT.
Please ensure to have JIT Indicator set in Material Master Purchasing View.
Regards,
Hari.

MEKL - Update prices in Schedule Agreements

Hello,
Do you know a link to check the steps I need to folllow to excute that transaction?
I ran it, but does not do nothing....

Hi,
Try the following steps:
First of all, you have to create a Schedule Agreement with a material number, just for test.
Use Net value for this item = 1000
1 - Tcode MEKL
2 - Enter Purchase Organization
3 - Enter Vendor and, if you want, enter Schedule Agreement number you have just created
4 - Sched. Agreements w/o Materials and Test Run does not need to be selected for this test
5 - Enter Absolute Amount
6 - Sign = + That means system will get Actual Schedule Agreement Value (PB00) + Absolute Amount you have entered.
So, if you created a Schedule Agreement with one line 10 - Material xxxxx - Net Value 1000, and you entered Absolute Amount = 1000 and sign = + that means, system will change your Sechedule Agreement to 2000.
Sign = - if you want decrease value
7 - Gross Price should be selected
8 - Scale lines does not need be selected
9 - Supplementary conditions does not need be selected
10 - Condition valid on = today (the day you have created your Schedule Agreement)
11- Press F8 or run
System should give you a table result with your Schedule Agreement
If everything is ok, press Save Button
Now, go to ME33L and check new values.
I hope it helps you.
If you have any doubts, please, let me know.
Best Regards,
Natan
Edited by: Firenarrow on Jun 9, 2010 10:04 PM
Edited by: Firenarrow on Jun 9, 2010 10:06 PM

How to measure performance of supplier when using scheduling agreement ?

Hello all,
My client has an absolute need to be able to measure the performance of its suppliers based on delivery dates and delivered quantities. That is to say he needs to be able to compare what dates and quantities were asked to what has been really delivered.
Most of the procurement processes used are based on scheduling agreements : schedule lines are generated by MRP and forecast is sent to supplier while firm requirements are sent through JIT calls.
It seems that when doing GR in MIGO, it is done against the outline agreement number, and not against the call. Therefore, we have no way to compare dates and quantity with what was expected (in the JIT call).
Do you know if SAP proposes a standard solution to this, and what could be a solution to this issue ?
Thanks for your help
E. Vallez

Hi,
My client faced the same problem and we ended up developing an own analysis in LIS. Since the GR is not linked to specific schedule line (SAP does some kind of apportioning, but it doesn't have to correlate to the correct match), one needs to do assumptions. Our assumption was the closest schedule line, i.e. each GR is related to the schedule line with the closest date. Then all GR the same day are totaled together before the quantity reliability is calculated, since the very same shipment can be reported through several GR transactions in SAP (one per pallet).
If anybody has info about what SAP has to offer in this question (or is developing), please tell us!
BR
Raf

Picking of the varient pricing in scheduling agreement

Hello Gurus
goodmorning
i have a small query i.e when i'm using OR as a document type for my sales order its picking the varient price and all are going fine but when i'm trying to do same for scheduling agreement DS in my sales order its not picking the varient pricing plz help me out wat could be the reason.
in advance thank you
venkat
Edited by: K.Venkata Chalapathi on Jan 30, 2009 9:10 AM

Dear Venkat,
Price will get determine in the sales order based on two settings
1.Pricing procedure determination
2.Condition record maintanence.
This may happen for two reasons
1.Different pricing procedures are getting determined for sales order and scheduling agreement.
One pricing procedure may have variant condition type and other pricing procedure may not have the variant condition type.
So check same pricing procedure is getting determine in the both documents or not
2.Condition record may not maintained for the scheduling agreement document type in VK11
So check the condition record maintanence for the variant condition type through VK13 transaction.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Finding of materials in scheduling agreement with more than 150 lines

Dear Experts,
we are in need to find materials in scheduling agreement with more than 150 lines. In standard SAP, materials can be searched only based on item Nos. is there a way we can search by material in ME38. also we noticed that find icon is greyed out in ME38.
Please suggest.
One more request is, to create an uplaod program for maintaining delivery schedules for multiple SAs.
please sugegst if this is feasible.
Regards
Raghavendra MS
9886138875

I am also curious if anyone has found a solution to this problem.
We routinely have scheduling agreements that are hundreds of line items. Users find it difficult to find the line item they wish to work with. It would be helpful if we could search by material number or sort the line items by material.
As Raghavendra mentioned (ctrl+F) functionality is not available in ME33L or ME38.
Thanks.

Information on Requirements type in scheduling agreement

Does anyone can give me infomation about 'requirements type' found in the procurement tab of the scheduling agreement?

Hi,
The requirement type determination in orders/ SA as follows: requirements types are determined according to a specific search strategy beginning with the material strategy group. Strategy for Determining the Requirements Type
1. First, an attempt is made to find a requirements type using the strategy group in the material master.(note: Define a requirement type and a class for each strategy which you will define in the production module)
2. If the strategy group has not been maintained, the system will determine it using the MRP group.
3. If the MRP group has not been defined, the system uses the material type instead of the MRP group when accessing the corresponding control tables.
4. If no requirements type is found here, the system assumes a special rule and attempts to find a requirements type with the aid of the item category and the MRP type.
5. If this is not possible, a last attempt is made to find a requirements type with the item category only.
6. If the last attempt fails, the system declares the transaction as not relevant for the availability check or transfer of requirements
Hope this will help you to understand better
Regards,
Krishna O

Creating Schedule lines in Scheduling agreement using LSMW

Hi,
I want to upload multiple schedule lines in scheduling agreement using LSMW. I have done the recording and maintained multiple lines in input file. However during execution LSMW creates only one line and keeps on ovewritting the same line. Please let me know how can I create multiple schedule lines.
Regards

First you should search for existing standard LSMW migration objects that possibly cover your scenario. These normally take care of complex header / multiple items / multiple subitems relations.
With a recording you can only load flat structures. Sometimes a "create new lines" / "enter first line" / "save transaction" logic can be constructed to load multiple items to a header (or even subitems to an item?) with a recording, but this can be pretty awkward.
Thomas

ME33L transaction : Scheduled Agreements

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for