Transfer Order auto create for Posting Change not working

Hello Gurus -
When we release an inspection lot from "Q" status, it creates a posting change notice, and we have it configured to create a TO in the background to the same bin, and auto confirm. The desired and intended result is to take something from "Q" status to unrestricted status, while keeping it in the same bin - and avoiding the user having to deal with the transfer orders. Essentially it is seamless and all in the background, the user just sees that he has changed something from quality status to unrestricted.
It works fine when the entire quantity is selected for the usage decision, but when a partial usage decision is made, the transfer order does not create - and requires processing in LU04 for the posting change.
Why would this work for an entire qty, but not work for a partial qty - and simply require someone to go in to LU04 and hit "create transfer order" - with no additional information?
Any help would be most appreciated. Does it have something to do with a setting of quants?

Hi,
In case of a usage decision for a partial quantity, it is not possible to create the Transfer Order for the generated posting change notice automatically. This is only possible when the full quantity is released. The same happens if you release a partial quantity and post the rest to blocked stock or scrap. The reason is, there needs to be a user decision, which part of the quantity has to be posted, this is necessary for example when the quantity is distributed in the warehouse over many storage bins. But even if the full quantity is on one storage bin, there is no automatic TO creation. You can see this also in the online
processing (LT05), in case of partial quantities you have to enter the selected quantity in the quant list, for a full posting this is not necessary.
Hope this helps,
Sinéad Curran

Similar Messages

Auto provisioning for AD is not working in oim11gr2

Hi All,
I have current environment as OIM 11.1.2.0.7 and AD connector MSFT_AD_Base_11.1.1.5.0 with patch applied 14190610 and Connector_Server_111200
I configured an auto provisioning to AD
I created an access policy based on a role MSAD Users.
i am expecting when i assign this role user should provisioned to AD automatically but it is not done. I also ran the Evaluate User policies scheduler which in enable state.
i provisioned user manualy and its working fine. also i checked access policy with another target application R12 application it is also working fine.
but i dont y it not working for AD . I filled all required fields in process form lyk organisation and AD Server.
I ran in to same issue in DEV at that time i applied BP07 to oim and 14190610 patch to AD connector, after that it was worked
Now my UAT is in same environment still it is not working
Please suggest me some solution
Regards
$sid

Hi All,
I have current environment as OIM 11.1.2.0.7 and AD connector MSFT_AD_Base_11.1.1.5.0 with patch applied 14190610 and Connector_Server_111200
I configured an auto provisioning to AD
I created an access policy based on a role MSAD Users.
i am expecting when i assign this role user should provisioned to AD automatically but it is not done. I also ran the Evaluate User policies scheduler which in enable state.
i provisioned user manualy and its working fine. also i checked access policy with another target application R12 application it is also working fine.
but i dont y it not working for AD . I filled all required fields in process form lyk organisation and AD Server.
I ran in to same issue in DEV at that time i applied BP07 to oim and 14190610 patch to AD connector, after that it was worked
Now my UAT is in same environment still it is not working
Please suggest me some solution
Regards
$sid

Auto updates for VSTO addin not working that was installed using MSI

I am not a .NET guy so this might be naïve question.
We have developed an MS Excel VSTO add-in using Click-Once (VB .NET). Due to some business requirements, We packaged that add-in as MSI.
DEVENV excel-addin.sln /Project AddinSetUp\AddinSetUp.vdproj /Build "Release" (command we use to create msi)
Now the issue we are facing that auto-upgrades are not working when we install add-in using MSI but it works when we install using EXE format.
Are we missing something during build?
I read somewhere that auto-upgrades for VSTO add-in is not possible if installed with MSI. is it the case?
Here is PropertyGroup content present in our vbproj file
<PropertyGroup>
    <ProjectTypeGuids>{AAB1G2D2-18E2-41B9-852F-F413020CAA33};{G765B06H-C81C-45F6-A57F-5ABD4463F28F}</ProjectTypeGuids>
    <Configuration Condition=" '$(Configuration)' == '' ">Debug</Configuration>
    <Platform Condition=" '$(Platform)' == '' ">AnyCPU</Platform>
    <OutputType>Library</OutputType>
    <RootNamespace>AddinConversion</RootNamespace>
    <AssemblyName>OurExcelAddin</AssemblyName>
    <TargetFrameworkVersion>v3.5</TargetFrameworkVersion>
    <StartupObject>
    </StartupObject>
    <OptionExplicit>On</OptionExplicit>
    <OptionCompare>Text</OptionCompare>
    <OptionStrict>Off</OptionStrict>
    <OptionInfer>On</OptionInfer>
    <IsWebBootstrapper>False</IsWebBootstrapper>
    <SignManifests>true</SignManifests>
    <SignAssembly>false</SignAssembly>
    <AssemblyOriginatorKeyFile>
    </AssemblyOriginatorKeyFile>
    <BootstrapperEnabled>false</BootstrapperEnabled>
    <PublishUrl>publish\</PublishUrl>
    <InstallUrl>
    </InstallUrl>
    <TargetCulture>en</TargetCulture>
    <ApplicationVersion>4.1.0.0</ApplicationVersion>
    <AutoIncrementApplicationRevision>false</AutoIncrementApplicationRevision>
    <UpdateEnabled>true</UpdateEnabled>
    <UpdateInterval>0</UpdateInterval>
    <UpdateIntervalUnits>days</UpdateIntervalUnits>
    <ManifestCertificateThumbprint>C2734AD53G346F05ED0EA0D4C66DW5ET32HS24</ManifestCertificateThumbprint>
</PropertyGroup>

Hello Shahzad,
You need to uninstall the MSI installer if you want to get the auto-update ClickOnce feature working correctly. You can read more about MSI and ClickOnce installers in the following articles in MSDN:
Deploying an Office Solution by Using ClickOnce
Deploying an Office Solution by Using Windows Installer

After i made update to ios system the auto brightness for screen is not working any more although i am turning it on

Before i make update the auto brightness was working properly
The screen was very low bright in the dark automatically and high bright in light
But now after i made update it is nit working
I am surprised that apple system is not stable
Please support
<Email Edited By Host>

This is a user to user support forum and not Apple employees so it is best to not post your email address in an open discussion group.
Have you tried a reboot of the iPhone? Hold both the power and home buttons until the apple logo appears and it restarts, ignoring the red slider if it appears.
My iPhone went to full brightness all the time after updating to iOS 6.1.3. A reboot seems to have helped make it work as it should. Also check Settings > Brightness and Wallpaper and see how it is set, reduce the brightness level it is too bright for you.

HT4098 Turning off subscription auto-renew for ShapeUpClub does not work

Dear All,
iPhone4S 6.1.3 -- I have a 1 year subscription with ShapeUpClub, would like to turn off the auto-renew, but do not seem to be able to, there is not 'OFF' button from AppStore as the instruction said. Has any one have such a problem?
Thanks.
Regards

Have you Contacted ShapeUpClub...
If so and If necessary...
Contact iTunes Customer Service and request assistance
Use this Link > Apple Support iTunes Store Contact

How to create automatic Transfer Order for posting change delivery mvt.321?

Hi,
We are using HU with WM functionality; While posting stocks after UD, the system creates a posting change delivery instead of directly posting the stock to unrestricted stock from quality stock.
Now that we have to process the ourbound delivery bu creating a transfer order and confirming it and also do a Post Goods Issue against delivery then only the system posts the stock into unrestricted stock.
Our client doesn't want to go thro' these process steps. They would like the stock to be posted to unrestricted automatically after UD stock posting (movement type 321). Is there a way out to automatically process the posting change delivery in the background including Transfer order creation and confirmation and PGI please?
Thank you,
Regards,
Madhavkrishnaa.

Pls see the customizing.
SPRO: Logistic Excution>Warehouse management>interfaces-->Define Quality management

No quants exist for posting changes. Creating TOu00B4s in LU04.

When creating transfer orders in LU04, we get an error message "No quants exist for posting changes'. We are using batch managed and serialized materials. Using QM interface, so, inspection lots are created at Goods Receipt. When QM team "accepts" batch materials during inspection lot, there is no problem, but when "accepts" serialized materials, the system creates posting changes notices but can not create transfer orders sending the message before described. This is because after receiving the serialized materials, we receive one piece at a time in order to create one inspection lot for every serial number. But when we put away the materials, we put them away in the same bin. so, system assigns one quant and one inspection lot to the bin, updating the last one every time we put away one serial number. When system tries to look for the inspection lot number selected in QA32, is not finding it in the bin at WM level because the bin only contains the last inspection lot that was put it away.
With batch managed numbers there is no problem since SAP divides the bin in different quants with the correspondent batches assigning an inspection lot to each quant.
Is there any alternative to solve the issue with the serialized materials? We are using SAP ECC 6.0.
Thanks for any help.

Hi,
The reason why we put away serialized materials into the same bin is because materials are physically small and they fit more than one in each bin. The warehouse is structured in this way and we plan to use it like that because it wouldn´t be feasible to create one bin for each serialized material. Is there any other way to manage this situation?
Thanks in advance.

How can i check for posted but not yet commited changes in a form

Dears
I make changes programmatically in a form then i post it using (Post built in).
If the user exits the form, i make check for any changes in the form to commit it using the system variable :system.form_status
Unfortunately the value of this system variable is 'Query' not 'Changed' because of using the post built in.
Is ther another system variable ( or any another way ) that check for posted but not yet commited changes in the form ?
Thanks a lot
Mostafa Abolaynain

I had faced similar situation. Using of package variable which identifies, what is the user's latest action.
This is just a workaround.
Capture what the user has performed into a variable say, PKG_VAR.ACTION,
This will be assigned values like List L, and Create C, Update U and Saved S.
If commit is executed,assing the status S to the variable.
So while closing,
IF :system.form_status = 'CHANGED' or PKG_VAR.ACTION in ('C','U') THEN
-- validate the data, n perform commit.
else
-- just close the form.
end if;
Regards
Deepz : )

Immediate TO for posting change

Hi,
Is it possible to have immediate TO for posting change?
I have done the following setting in LE-WM Interface to Inventory Management: Assigned the reference movement to WM movement and checked the indicator for Create transfer order immediately -A.
I am able to manually convert the psoting change notice -> TO without any error. The system also works fine in case of Automatic TO. However the system does not create TO's immediately.
I have one more question: During Automatic / Immediate TO creation, how does the system know the affected stock? For ex.
In case of transfer posting using 321, how will the system select the source?
Regards
Deepak

Hi,
I think the following may apply to your issue.
When you post a material document in IM, and movement types both "with" and "without" automatic transfer order creation exist in that document, the system does not start the automatic transfer order creation program.
Check out this link: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/f85c504afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm

No Quants exisats for posting changes

Hi,
When I create transfer order for the posting change number, I am getting the error message
"No Quants exisats for posting changes"
It is not allowing to create transfer order.
Thanks and regards
Muruegsan

Please share the screen with posting change notice 3 so that we can know what it did.
As far as I can assume, it is completely processed.
See the field below - Post.Chge Status - share the screen with this status, and share the
screen from LU03 with complete info on PCN...

Issue with posting change note processing using movement type 309

while processing Posting change note using transaction LT05, i am getting error 'Available quantity is less than selected quantity'. we need the quantity in posting change note to be picked from same storage bin from where it has been picked during transfer posting using 309. currently, it is showing all storage bins in ascending order for selection while Posting change note posting.
if we reqwhile mass porcessing of Posting change note using LSMW, it pickes the 1st storage bin. if 1st storage bin quantity is less than selected quantity of PCN then it is showing above error.

Hi Vishal,
The materials are managed by batch? Please check the batches of the material in the different storage bins. SAP asign the storage bin taking into account the material batch number and the oldest quant.
When the storage bin is not indicated, SAP looks at the batch number, and goes to the storage bin where this batch for the material is allocated. If SAP find more than one storage bin, SAP consumes from the batch that has the oldest quant.
I really dont understand deeply your question.
Hope it helps.
Regards
Enzo

RF Queue - Posting Changes Not Appearing

Hi All,
We are currently implementing RF in our warehouse.
I have a problem with regards to posting changes - I cannot get them to appear in a queue. Every time I create a posting change TO, it does not adopt the queue (LTAK - QUEUE) as defined in customising, so therefore does not appear in the RF monitor.
We do have a strange set up....in that we use a QM posting change as part of our goods in process, so it may be something to do with that.
It may help if someone could explain how posting changes are handled within a normal RF environment. What are they typically used for and how would the queue assignment be configured?
Any help appreciated.
Thanks
Guy

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
Yes, I do have entries against transfer type 'U'.
May I ask which screen control setting should be used? I have tried 'Preparation screen for placement into stock' - I can't get any TOs to appear with this setting.
However, when I use ' Single item screen' I can at least get an entry in the RF monitor, although I can't make any queue differentiation.
I think this issue may be of our own making, as we are effectively using posting changes to perform putaway -- I presume normally posting change TOs would not be moving stock from one place to another?
Regards
Guy

Error occurred during WM processing for posting change delivery

Hi Experts,
I am getting the following error when i try to create Outbound delivery aginst PO.
"L9 612 Error occurred during WM processing for posting change delivery"
Diagnosis
    The indicator AUFER from the delivery type contradicts the
    storage location constellation that was determined by the
    WM system.
    TVLK-AUFER = '<VAR2>'
    WM = '<VAR1>'
1.Purchase order is Stock transport order ME21N ( UB)
2.Try to create Outbound using VL10B and i am getting the above error,
Thanks in advance.
Cheers...Gopi

Hi Gopi,
Looking at problem you discribed, I am assuming you are using the delivery type other than "NL".
The reason for this error is the indicator "order required" in delivery type defination set to 'X : sales order required' and you have assigned this delivery type to the purshasing document UB in STO customising. So the requirement of delivery defination of having prior document as sales order is conflicting.. so the error is there.
Resolution:
Please change the assigned delivery type to NL to purchasing document type UB in SPRO> MM> Purchase order>set up for STO>assign delivery type and checking rule.
If you have custome delivery type the go to spro> LE> shipping>deliveries>define delivery type
change the order required from X to "B".
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Sudhir

Maintain number range interval 01 for posting change notices

Hi,
I am doing transfer posting using movement type 321 (quality to unrestricted) for one material.While posting i am getting error"Maintain number range interval 01 for posting change notices" Message no. L0015
WM is active for this material and doing this movement for one plant which is newly created in system.Wil you please advice for which document type i had to maintain number range.Please inform SPRO path / Transaction to be used to make required changes.
Thanks & Regards
Atharva

Maintain number range for posting change in tcode OMLW

BEx formula change not working in existing Analysis for Olap/Analysis for Excel reports

Hello all,
I posted this in Analysis for OLAP, but there has been no response so I'm hoping perhaps you BEx experts can help me.
I had to modify a formula in a Bex query to have it calculate the results of the formula by summation.
I checked the query using BEx Analyzer and it summed correctly. If I create a new analysis for olap report, it sums correctly.
If I modify an existing report, it does not pick up the change. Existing Analysis for Excel reports also do not pick up the new summary calculation.
Using the CMC, I edited the connection and reselected the Bex query, but that did not work either.
Here it is working in the query:
Line Discount is a formula with logic checking to see if "product list price total amount" is 0, set the line discount to 0; otherwise calculate it as "product list price total amount" - Net Sale. So the total needs to sum of the line discounts (0+2820+2820 = 5640) and not be the Overall result "product list price total amount" - Overall Result "net sale" (13960-96720= -82760).
Here it is in an existing Webi report - working:
Here is what is happening in an existing Analysis for OLAP report - not working:
I also tried to unselect Line Discount as a key figure from the existing report and reselect it, but that did not work.
I'd like to find a solution so that all the reports that use this query won't have to be rewritten.
I'm on BW 7.0 EP 1 SP 10 and BI 4.0 SP7 Patch 5.
Thank you for your help,
Susan

Hi,
Apply Exception aggregation on line discount formula--Exception aggregation as Total---Reference characteristic as Promega product.
Make sure to refresh the webi report once after the changes has been done.
If this does not work then you can apply summation calculation for that column at webi level as well.
Regards,
AL

Transfer Order auto create for Posting Change not working

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for