Transport Request is not flagged for import into production.

When I try to migrate a CR from the quality system to the acceptance system, through solution manager system, the status flag still remains to be "To be tested" which normally does not happen.
I get 4 warnings as below:
1) Status was reset by system
2) No import into test system has taken place.
3) Transport request is not flagged for import into production
4) The tester role cannot be the same as the developer role.
Usually when a CR is selected for migration to Acceptance, the status flag automatically sets to "productive", which in turn depicts that the CR has been migrated to acceptance and is ready for import into production.
But when I check the Transport log in the acceptance system, it is evident that the CR has been migrated to acceptance with errors.

I guess these errors you mentioned are the reason why ChaRM reports your transprot request as
2) No import into test system has taken place.
1) Status was reset because 2) is not fullfilled.
3) did not get flagged because status was not set due to previous errors.
4) business partner of user with function "tester" (apparently the one who tries to set status) is the same as the business partner assigned to function "developer". If it should be the same person you can switch off the warning in customizing.
Try to correct import errors and repeat status switch.

Similar Messages

Break mail into "chunks" for importing into Entourage?

Hello,
I currently have a mail.app account that is around 10GB in size. Mail.app is giving our studio far too much trouble (especially when upgrading from 1.0 to 2.0) and we're switching to Entourage. The problem I'm having right now is that Entourage limits its mail database to 4GB, thus I can't import my mail.app account. Is there a way to break up my mail.app account into more manageable (3GB) chucks for importing into Entourage?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Kristin.

OPEN LETTER TO THE MAIL 2.0 CODING TEAM. RSVP.
with thanks to DAVID GIMENO GOST, for answering so many people's posts about all the mail 2.0 bugs.
hi guys,
i love all things apple, and i have done for twenty years.
but with respect, your build of mail 2.0 really could be a lot better.
moving my mail from 1.0 on an ibook g3 running os X 10.3.9, over to mail 2.0 on an intel macbook 1.83 running os X 10.4.7 has been a nightmare.
the discussion boards of many mac sites feature countless cases of people making the move from 1.0 to 2.0, with all their e-mails disappearing.
having spent two weeks reading the knowledge forums, and learning about emailchemy, plus all the complications which, even with that third party program, still exist in moving one's mail over from version 1.0 over to 2.0, are both massive and horrendous.
and that's for me, who has twenty years of finding my way around mac bugs.
but this one is the most difficult i've ever seen, as well as being one of the most widespread problems in a FULL VERSION RELEASE of an apple program, which apple has done nothing to resolve during the six months in which this problem has been widespread in the mac community worldwide.
so thank god for DAVID GIMENO GOST !
i'm amazed that apple still hasn't come up with a patch for moving mail from 1.0 to 2.0.
even now, while i've finally got all my mail back today, 95% is showing as unread, due to the last obstacles in the process, which i can no longer face solving.
i've also lost hundreds of red mail flags during the transfer :o(.
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE, guys:
we shouldn't need to be buying third party software to move our e-mails from apple mail 1.0 up to apple mail 2.0, and even then be faced by massive hurdles to overcome, which take weeks for someone who at least has SOME idea of what he's doing.
i pity all the people who read the numerous forum posts about how difficult it is to transfer their mail from 1.0 to 2.0, and simply give up on the spot, and have to start their e-mail history TODAY, unable to access their previous e-mail again - potentially now for ever.
because the ironic joke is that we can't even have an access copy of mail 1.0 on our macs to read our old e-mails, unless we hack that program out of the 10.3 cd installation set, which the gurus on your own web site recommend us NOT to do !
so what are we supposed to do, to access our old e-mail, which we can't open, even though YES, it is in our mail folder, and YES, we did full rebuilds of every mail folder, and YES, we trashed our mail preferences first.
e-mail is now at the very center of the average mac user's digital life.
a user's most important program should not require countless hours scrolling through the astonishing number of problems within mail 2.0, which the apple.com discussion boards evidence, with new problems being added every day.
please sort this out, and build a patch, for the sanity of the many people who love apple, but who are unable to access any of their old e-mails.
because i wouldn't wish the last fortnight on anyone else.
RSVP, APPLE.
with best wishes to everyone on the infinity loop,
michael thorne
london, england
[email protected]
ps: if you're a mac user who has been affected by the mail 2.0 disappearing bug, please post a reply to this message, and send me an e-mail to: [email protected], so that we can draw apple's increasing attention to it. thanks.
MacBook1. 1.83 GHz. 512 MB. Mac OS X (10.4.7)

BEx Transport Requests '' ist not available or not suitable

hi, all,
I want to change a query, that has been transported back from Prod.System into TestSystem. Changes in the query aren't possible - the error message is
" BEx Transport Requests '' ist not available or not suitable ".
Now, there is a Standard BEx Transport Request and, in the RSA1 -> Transport Connection I see the query complete with that Transport Request.
What can the reason be? Any Idea?
Thanks a lot in advance.
neven

Ciao, Paolo,
thank you for the quick responce.
I did exactly as described :
The easiest thing to do is the following:
1) collect your query in transport connection
2) check if it is already assigned to a transport
2a)if assigned to a transport check if this is the standard bex transport. If so go to step 3, If not see if you should just tranport that request (or you can just go to step 3...but i wouldn't advise that)
3) unlock the standard bex request
4) now go back to transport connection and put the collected objects in a new request
5) release and transport your new request
It still doesn't help. I can't change the Query. The error-message is stil the same.
best regards
neven

'invalid class-java beans not available for import

Hi Experts,
i am using java bean model in my Web Dynpro Application.
for that one i have created command bean(Customer) and in my command bean i am using some other class(CustomerInfo) as reference. this CustomerInfo class contains 4 attribtes(name ,id ,etc all are of type String)
when i try to import these 2 class into web dynpro (using java bean model),for the Customer class it
is giving an error message 'invalid class-java beans not
available for import'.but 2nd class(CustomerInfo) is imported successfully with out giving the error.what might be reason.
any help will be appriciated
Thanks in advance
With Regards
Naidu

Naidu,
Please try to repeat JavaBean model import when running IDE in console mode (correspondign short-cut should be available in Windows Start menu, otherwise just copy original short-cut, edit it and change in command string "javaw" to java).
Post here what is shown on console during import.
VS

Invalid class: Javabean not available for import

hi all,
I have developed a very simple javabean in my WDJ DC in folder src/packages like this:
package test.beans;
public class TreeBean {
     private String name;
      * @return
     public String getName() {
          return name;
      * @param string
     public void setName(String string) {
          name = string;
however when I try to import that into a model in NWDS 7.0.11, I get Invalid class: javabean not available for import.
When I try to do the same in NWDS7.1SP5 it succeeds.
What's wrong?
Thanks for your help
Vincenzo

Rebuild and reload the DC/project

MXF file conversion for import into Final Cut Express 4

Does anyone know of a good software product to convert mxf files to quicktime for import into Final Cut Express 4? Not having much luck finding one. Thanks

alski999 wrote:
Does anyone know of a good software product to convert mxf files to quicktime for import into Final Cut Express 4?
the makers of famous flip4mac (=wmv plug-in for QT), offer a mxf-modul too
http://www.telestream.net/telestream-products/desktop-products.htm
they offer a trial - test before buy.
mxf is a professional format, so professional price ...

Opening Query: u0091BEx transport request '' is not available or not suitable"u0092

Hello,
I tried was able to run and modify a query last week. When I try to modify/run it now, it gives the message below and allows me to run it but not modify.
BEx transport request '' is not available or not suitable"
What are the possbile causes and remedies to this problem?
Thanks in advance.

dear Amanda,
here can imply 'copy' since as the result objects(query and elements) in production are exactly same with dev. but the terms 'copy' itself in query normally refer to copy query from one infoprovider to another infoprovider.
(transaction rszc).
i think she mean the query objects included in transport request and will be carried on to qa/production server.
once the new queries 'placed on transport'(in request), we must immediately create a bex request for the same package, otherwise nobody can save their queries (that included in the request).
transport bex
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/38/5ee7377a98c17fe10000009b38f842/frameset.htm
copy query
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw33/helpdata/en/9f/f57539d6d1c93be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
hope this helps.

Bex Transport request is not available

Hi guys
I want to change the Bex query from query designer, when i go for change mode it didnu2019t allow me to change and throws error message "Bex transport request " is not available or not suitable" and in second line it gives "choose an existing request.
Can any one tell me how to change the Bex query with a transport request?
Gaurav

Hi,
You get this message if you have captured the query in a transport request and released or transported the request.
You can somply capture the query in a new request again from transport connection and then you will be able to edit the query.
even after capturing the query in the request is not allowing to edit then you need to try the option as explained by our friend above.
Regds,
Shashank

BEx Transport Request is not available or not sitable

Hi,
When i try to install some queries from Business Content in the BW DEV box, the error was :
<b>BEx Transport Request is not available or not sitable</b>
Please let me know what has to be done in order to get out of this error
Thanks & Regards,
Kishore

Hi Ken,
Thanks for responding to my problem.
You are right. I am installing from business content queries that have never been installed before.
so when i am installing the queries from business content the error was :
BEx transport request is not suitable or not available.
How to proceed now ?
Please give reply ASAP....
Thanks & Regards,
Kishore

The request has not yet been updated into the data targets.

Request successfully loaded into PSA - start further update
Diagnosis
The request has as data target "only PSA". It arrived there successfully.
System Response
The request has not yet been updated into the data targets.
Procedure
You can now trigger the update manually. The final target is determined in the request tables. You do not have to make any further settings.
I am getting this error daily. In RSMO screen status tab option called u201CProcess manuallyu201D, so am doing this manually daily. Is there any solution to fix this problem permanently?
Thanks & Regards,
Praveen Yagnamurthy.

Hi Praveen,
Dont you have Process chains in Production system for loading thid data. If so its better to schedule the PC rather go for manual loading. In Prod system you will not be able to change. You will have the make the changes in the Development Environment & collect these changes in a TR & then move them into Test environment first to make sure it is working fine. And then once it is tested, you can move the TR to Prod sys.
Hope it helps!
Regards,
Pavan

Excise Accounting document not generated for Imported Asset GR

Dear all,
Excise accounting document is not generated for imported asset goods receipt(MIGO)
but "C" Register part 2 no. is generated,usual accounting document is generated for GR,
Asset is Dr to GR/IR
Process is
1. Create asset purchase order with acct. assignment "A",
2. Customs miro based on p.o.
3. Do GR with excise
4. Post invoice for orginal vendor.
What will be cause of this problem ?
How to solve this issue ?

The above issue may be due to Accout assignmnet -A . Check your accout assignment in spro -mm-purchasing -accout assignment - Asset A - GR Non valuated has Ticked on . If it is ticked on - No Fi entry will happen at the Time of GR .
The reason being , if an FI entry happen for the first time , asset is capitalised . To avoid this GR is made in ur config as this .
rewdzzzz is full if correct
Edited by: manu m on Apr 24, 2010 11:11 AM

Maximum file size for importing into Premiere Pro CS6

Hi,
I'm considering recording raw video, no compression at 720p, 30 fps for 20-30 min. This woudl result in a file that is close to 80 Gbytes. I'm wondering what the maximum file size for importing into premiere Pro is and if I need to split this file up into smaller pieces. Any recommendations on how I may deal with uncompressed raw video that is pretty long in length?
Thanks,
Serena

There is bound to be some limit somewhere in the program, but you should be well below that. The biggest issue might be whether your computer is up to the task of handling it. If you will post your computer specs., someone will give you comments on that aspect.
Good luck,
Hunt

Excise base value is not picking for Imports

Dear All,
     Excise base value is not picking for Imports when doing MIGO and BED/E CESS/S&H E CESS also not picking.
          Please suggest me
Thanks,
Tiru

Hi,
In case of Imports, you have to define following condiiton types in MM Pricing Procedure;
JCDB     IN:Basic Custom Duty
JCV1     IN : CVD
JECV     IN : Ed Cess on CVD
J1CV     IN : H&SECess on CVD
JEDB     IN : Ed Cess on BCD
JSDB     IN : H&SECess on BCD
JADC     Addnl Duty of Custom
These should be created as a delivery cost condition in M/06. And assign the accruals to these in M/08.
Folowing Gl Accounts will be assigned to those accruals in OBYC;
CVD Clearing (For accrual of conditions JCV1, JECV, J1CV, JADC) and Customs Clearing (For accrual of conditions JCDB, JEDB, JSDB)
Now follow the below procedure for Import Purchase;
1. ME21N u2013 Create Import Purchase Order (Here assign the Vendor of Customs Office to the above mentioned 7 condition types in "Details" of "Conditions")
2. MIRO u2013 Enter Customs Invoice w.r.t. Import PO (Here select "Planned Delivery Cost" and do LIV for Customs office Vendor, enter values for duties as per Bill of Entry manullay during LIV)
3. J1IEX u2013 Capture Bill of Entry
4. MIGO u2013 Goods Receipt against Import PO
5. J1IEX u2013 Post Bill of Entry
6. MIRO u2013 Enter Vendor Invoice
7. MIRO u2013 Enter Clearing Agentu2019s Invoice

Exporting Final Cut Pro audio for importing into Avid via OMF

Greeting Colleagues
I'm just wondering if there are any special consideration when creating an audio OMF in Final Cut Pro for importing into a PC based Avid edit suite.
best
Aldo

Answered under Final Cut Pro thread.

Transport request is not generating in Development

Hi Friends ,
Transport request is not geting generated in develpment system........so what could be the problem....
RB

Hi Raghavendra,
Can you give me some more details ? Which support package ? What kind of transport (java or abap) ?
Have you configured CTS+ ?
Best regards,
GL
http://newitbizz.blogspot.com/

Transport Request is not flagged for import into production.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for