Travel workflow problems.

I apologize in advance for the length of this question.
When I travel, I carry a MB Air with OS X 10.9.1 and Aperture 3.5.1. I create managed Libraries on a 500GB EHD (or two).
I will certainly do some deleting and minimal editing.
When I get home I transfer the travel Library to my iMac (27" 2013, same configuration) desktop. I open the Library in Aperture but rebuild it first as this sometimes helps the below problem. I then merge the travel library to my present iMac Aperture working managed Library. (I create a new Library for each year on the iMac.)
Now I carry out my real editing etc. on the home Aperture. When I go to open my Projects there will be random images that have the dreaded yellow triangle, the files can't be found. If I reload that Project, once or sometimes more from the travel library I will often get rid of the triangle.
I just went through this with ten projects, last week. Finally all files were present and accounted for. However today out of the blue the warning badge showed up on all the images in one project. Having saved the travel library, I was able to reload that project and I have access to the images again.
For me what this means is that I have to store my travel Libraries even after thay are merged with my home Library. This is obviously a PITA and takes up space. My home Libraries are stored on a Drobo 5D. I never have that problem with images downloaded from a CF card to the home Library. If I go to "Find Referenced Files" it lists the missing images but I think it says they are on the Drobo. (Same thing however used to happen with my old Mac Pro System and WD EHDs.) Sorry I did not copy the field.
Any ideas as to what is going on? If it happens again should I just rebuild the home Library to see if the missing files will be found? Can I ever trust my system so that I don't have to keep all my (redundant) travel Libraries?

SMB 2 wrote:
When you get the chance can you briefly outline your merging steps.
Thanks.
Hi. There are no steps .   In my "master" Library I run "File➞Import➞Library" and select my travel Library. If prompted, I select "Add".) I do other things for hours. When the merge is finished, I close Aperture, re-open it, and let it run unmolested overnight. Then I close it again, reopen it, and look to see if anything is amiss.
More fully, when traveling I hew to the following:
(First let's change our terms. I am now going to call my "master" Library my Home Library and the Libraries I use when traveling Travel Libraries.)
Clean up Home Library
     Empty Aperture Trash
     Repair Database
     Confirm that no Originals are missing; confirm that all Originals are where I think they are
Create new Travel Library     Select a few Images and run "File➞Export➞{items} as Library"
Move that Library to an EHD. Rename EHD to match expected contents.
Prepare second EHD as back up for EHD with Travel Library.     Rename to match, e.g.: "Travel Library BU".
Travel
Record data
Import recorded data files into Travel Library
Back-up EHD before re-formatting camera cards !! (I use SuperDuper and clone drives.)
Codify, tag, develop Images in Travel Library as time permits
Return home.      Travel Library EHD stays with me (along with cameras, etc.). Travel Library back up EHD goes in checked bag.
Clean up Travel Library     (As above for Home Library)
Import Travel Library into Home Library     "File➞Import➞Library"
Let Aperture run with Home Library loaded, unmolested, overnight. (Voodoo, but with some justification.)
Close and re-open Aperture. Give it all the time it wants when closing.
Confirm import
     All Projects and Images present?
     Project descriptions and Image metadata intact and complete?
     All Originals accounted for and where I expect them to be?
Back up Home Library using standard Home back up procedure
Relocate managed Originals to EHD dedicated to Originals of Home Library Images
Back up dedicated EHD using standard Home back up procedure
Back up Home Library again, using standard Home back up procedure
Erase EHD with Travel Library; erase EHD with Travel Library back-up     I have a working copy and two back-ups. I confirmed that the working copy is good prior to backing up. I erase the drives now, so that I won't hesitate to use them later. (Three months from now I don't want to pick up the former Chile Travel Library EHD and ask myself, "Oh -- this has my files from Chile. Is it OK to erase these?")
The principle is basic: always have two back-up copies, on separate devices, of all your files, and never have the working copy and both back-up copies in the same physical location. When traveling, this is impractical, but the above is, imho, a good compromise.
Clearly that covers a good bit more than just merging, but I thought it might prove useful.
--Kirby.

Similar Messages

Request is created instead of trip(Travel Workflow)

Hello All,
I am facing a problem in Travel workflow, after LCP upgrade,when a trip is created it is being created as a request.
Where should i look to resolve this.
Any suggesstions will be appreciated.
Thanks
Harsh

go to swe2 T-code and associate BO to Workflow for trigger that
or
just go to ur Workflow (WS20000040) using SWDD T-Code then go for Workflow start step and make start event for BO
like for trip BO is "BUS2089" and event is "CREATED"
save and activate Workflow than it will got trigger for creating trip.
Thanks & reared
Diwakar Chaube

UWL: Missing decision buttons for travel workflow

Hi all,
We're implementing travel workflow for a customer and we're not able to display the decision buttons in the UWL. We're quite baffled, because we've done this many times before with success. The items appear correctly, but no buttons for approve/reject.
What we have done:
- re-registered system
- manually created the XML file
- decision is working fine in backend (WF inbox)
- decision is working fine with RFCs (e.g. SAP_WAP_DECISION_COMPLETE)
We've compared UWL support info with a working system, and the only difference is that in the working system, there is an action called "GroupAction" which is not available in the non-working system for the relevant decision task.
The StepID / Item Type is "TS99000001"
I've already created an OSS, but maybe someone here know something.
The backend is of version ECC 6.0 SP18 (HR 40) (Ehp0)
THe portal is NW 7.0 SP17
Best Regards,
Hans Petter Bjørn

second is......
the view which is called in your xml file is there ???
< View name="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.view.TripCheckView" selectionMode="SINGLESELECT" width="98%" supportedItemTypes="uwl.task.webflow.decision.TSXXXXXX" columnOrder="TripNumber, statusIcon, subject, priority, creatorId, createdDate, dueDate, processor, forwardedDate, attachmentCount, detailIcon, APPROVE, REJECT" sortby="priority:descend, dueDate:ascend, createdDate:descend" tableDesign="STANDARD" visibleRowCount="10" headerVisible="yes" queryRange="undefined" tableNavigationFooterVisible="yes" tableNavigationType="CUSTOMNAV" refresh="300" dueDateSevere="0" dueDateWarning="0" emphasizedItems="none" displayOnlyDefinedAttributes="yes" dynamicCreationAllowed="yes" actionPosition="bottom" referenceBundle="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.TripCheck" >
      < DisplayAttributes >
        < DisplayAttribute name="REJECT" type="checkbox" sortable="no" format="default" actionRef="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.action.checker.ClassifyTripIncorrect" referenceBundle="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.Reject" hAlign="CENTER" vAlign="MIDDLE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes" / >
        < DisplayAttribute name="APPROVE" type="checkbox" sortable="no" format="default" actionRef="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.action.checker.ClassifyTripConsistent" referenceBundle="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.Approve" hAlign="CENTER" vAlign="MIDDLE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes" / >
        < DisplayAttribute name="TripNumber" type="string" sortable="yes" format="default" referenceBundle="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.TripNumber" hAlign="LEFT" vAlign="BASELINE" maxTextWidth="0" headerVisible="yes" / >
      < / DisplayAttributes >
      < Actions >
        < Action name="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.action.checker.ClassifyTripConsistent" groupAction="yes" handler="UserDecisionHandler" referenceBundle="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.Consistent" returnToDetailViewAllowed="no" launchInNewWindow="no" >
          < Properties >
            < Property name="decisionKey" value="0001" / >
          < / Properties >
        < / Action>
        < Action name="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.action.checker.ClassifyTripIncorrect" groupAction="yes" handler="UserDecisionHandler" referenceBundle="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.CorrectionRequired" returnToDetailViewAllowed="no" launchInNewWindow="no" >
          < Properties >
            < Property name="decisionKey" value="0002" / >
          < / Properties >
        < / Action >
        < Action reference="submitUserDecisions" / >
        < Action reference="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.gotoWorkcenter" / >
        < Action reference="refresh" / >
        < Action reference="defaultGlobalWizard" / >
        < Action reference="addToNavigation" / >
        < Action reference="removeFromNavigation" / >
      < / Actions >
    < / View >
< / Views >
Regards
Tushar Dave
Edited by: Tushar Dave on Aug 13, 2009 4:01 PM
Edited by: Tushar Dave on Aug 13, 2009 4:42 PM

Simple Travelling salesman problem

Dear Anyone,
i know this query mite sound silly but the fact is i haven found a neat solution to this simple problem on the internet or the forum.. All existing solutions are way too complicated using Genetic algorithms or annealing etc.
I have a list of 10 places with respective lat/lon. I want to sort them in the travelling Salesman problem taking the first place as origin. Since there are only 10 places, i guess even Brute Force method is practical. So can anyone help out with sample codes or links??? I am kinda newbie in this area of coding..

Well there are a tonne of ways to tackle this. Since you want to do it brute force, then I suggest you tackle it the simplest possible way:
Enumerate all of the possible routes through the graph.
If you think this is too difficult and don't know where to start... then you're going to have to think about it some more. I'm not just going to give you the code - that's not what these forums are for. Frankly this is a homework problem, and regardless of whether it's literally your homework, you're not going to learn anything unless you tackle it yourself.
I'm happy to give you some advice though. Start off figuring out the steps you'd have to do to tackle this manually. Start with a graph with two nodes. That should be easy. Then try one with three. Doable. Try four. At that point you should have figured out the general algorithm that you're using.
Once you've figured out how you solve this manually, you need to start coding this up. As indicated, you need to decide what your data structures are going to be - concentrate on how you're going to represent the nodes, the permitted routes between them, and their distances.
If you get stuck with the coding we can help you with that too, but you have to show that you've made an effort. No free lunch.

How can we debug an SRM workflow problem?

Q: How can we debug an SRM workflow problem?

Hi,
In SRM system using transaction SWI6 you can troubleshoot the workflow process.
if you are using N step badi in the workflow process, we can debug the badi BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI
method GET_REMAING_APPROVERS
if required please take a help of Abap consultant to debug...
Thanks & Regards,
prasad.s

Shared Project Workflow Problem: Hitting a Wall with Markers

Hi there,
Apologies in advance for the long note. We're using Adobe CC to edit and finish commercials and are having a significant issue regarding shared project workflow. First, some context:
We often edit projects remotely. When this happens, assistants and other editors who remain in LA will have access to the media on our SAN while the editor and assistant traveling out of town will have their own copy of the media. I know Adobe Anywhere would solve any issue relating to two identical sets of media in use in different cities, but we're a small shop and the hardware and software expense don't make sense for us at this time. Please do not respond to anything mentioned from here on by stating we should just get Adobe Anywhere. Thanks.
What will regularly happen is that the remote editor and assistant will need work done on the project here in LA while they're in session with the clients. Sometimes this work involves marking up clips with comment markers so the editor can more easily locate a specific moment. Here's where the problem arises.
Unlike FCP and Avid, Premiere handles markers within the clip's metadata. So, if I have two separate projects linking to separate but identical instances of media, one of those media instances gets updated with new markers, there is currently no way to get those markers to the other project without also shuttling the new marked-up media. This is not possible when a remote editor needs dailies marked up in a couple hours and is working across the country or abroad.
But let's assume for the sake of argument that it is possible and we apply this workflow. Let's also assume that in the time it takes the local assistant to mark up the clips for the remote editor, the editor has added a couple markers of his own, which is reasonable and happens all the time. Now when the editor links to the newly marked up clips he's received via shipment, he'll wipe out all the markers he's made on his own since giving the order to mark up the footage. That is a significant inconvenience, especially with clients in the room asking stuff like "can we look at the take where the guy says 'good' instead of 'great'?"
So what happens if we just have repeating sets of media, so that every time the clips markers get updated, the editor actually imports those clips, even though the picture and audio data in those clips is completely redundant to what's already in the project. The issues with this are, as I can see it, 1) increasing the amount complexity within the project so that you'd have to scan many bins of dailies to look for a single marker, 2) increasing by orders of magnitude the amount of storage space needed, 3) even if problems 1 and 2 are handled, if you have to go to finish with multiple versions of a cut, and those versions reference separate instances of the same clip from different bins, Premiere's dupe frame detection will not work and you'll need to spend a lot of extra time locating duplicate clips manually before sending your EDL or XML off to final color grading.
At this point, I think it's necessary to interject something: we're talking about markers here. Why is this such a problem? FCP and Avid have no such issues simply by making markers - even clip markers - part of the project metadata. From what I understand, Adobe has chosen to do things differently because of dynamic link, so that After Effects and Prelude, for example, could add markers to a clip and those markers would ripple across all instances of that clip in the different applications. It's a great feature which we take advantage of here from time to time.
So what's the solution?
My workaround in CS6, which does not solve the issue of needing to merge clip markers so that an editor's markers and an assistant's markers can be applied to a single piece of media, was to turn off "write XMP ID to Files on Import." This would generate an XMP sidecar file which could be easily passed along with a project file to the remote editor, who could then overwrite his local XMP sidecars with the new ones containing the new marker info.
However, in Premiere CC that is no longer possible. It appears that if Premiere CC can access the XMP ID on a file, it will not generate a sidecar regardless of what you have set in your media preferences. We use ProRes Proxy as our dailies format (again, please no comments on this, it is not up for debate at this time) and Premiere can get to the XMP ID within the files and will not, no matter what it seems, generate an XMP sidecar.
We could change the company workflow to use DNxHD 36 instead of ProRes Proxy, which would give us XMP sidecars, but that would not solve the issue of needing to merge marker lists between projects non-destructively.
The best solution I can think of would be to have a script or some kind or built-in feature which would allow for the batch export, import and merging of marker lists. This way Adobe could keep its current clip-metadata-based marker workflow while giving professional users needing more flexible marker behavior the ability to have assistants non-destructively modify clip markers without necessitating the creation of extra media or project complexity.
I would really love some input on this and ideas from the pro community out there who has experience with shared project workflows - especially projects being shared remotely. There's not a lot of info out there about this and it would be great to hear what others are doing.
Thanks a million for sticking with this, if you've made it this far.
Best,
Jon

Thanks Jim,
I understand that Adobe Anywhere solves this, but there should be this fairly basic functionality (which exists in Avid and FCP) in a non-enterprise edition of the software. I have submitted a couple different feature requests about this, going back to CS5, so hopefully enough people make similar requests for a fix to be implemented. Adobe Anywhere is really not a solution for our small shop as currently configured/priced, especially when we can have editors working remotely with very affordable USB 3 drives. The only hangup is the markers, which just isn't worth a 5 figure fix. As such it's hard to consider the problem solved for either us or any small shop or post crew.
Best,
Jon

Error in Travel Workflows

Hi all,
We are facing problem with our Travel Request workflow. We have made copy of the std workflow. Workflow gets triggered properly (using BUS2089-REQUESTCREATED event), goes to approver and works well.
Whenever the approver clicks on 'Send trip back for correction' button, the initiator gets a UWL for changes. He double clickes on the UWL and a screen opens (PR05) to make changes.
However, when he clicks on 'Save' button. the event "BUS2089-CHANGED" is triggered, followed by "BUS2089-CREATED".
So everytime the Travel Request is being changed, the Request gets changed in the backend, but simultaneously Travel Expense workflow for that employee gets triggered. Can anyone tell me how to stop that and make the Travel Reqeust workflow re-trigger?
Regards.

Hello,
Apologies, my mistake, I was looking at my notes instead of at an actual workflow.
You wrote:
>Yes Rick. Sorry for that. It was a typo.
>What I meant was:
&TRIP& ---> &WI_OBJECT_ID&
Was that a typo as well? It should be:
&TRIP& ---> &_WI_OBJECT_ID&
That is, assuming that the task is calling a method of the BOR of the workflow, otherwise it should be something like
&TRIP& ---> &THISTRIP&
regards
Rick Bakker
Hanabi Technology

Approving travel expenses problem

Hello all,
We have a travel request which, although already approved, still stands in the user's buisness worklflow INBOX.
If we try to go into this trip to u201Capproveu201D it again, we get a message that the "work item has already been deleted or ended, unable to execute again".
Does anyone have an idea how to handle this problem?
Thanks in advance for your help,
Soumaya

Hi Soumaya,
maybe you can try this, just delete the workflow if you sure that is already approve.
1. you can check your flow of workflow in tcode SWIA.
2. get the number of work item ID (about user decision/approval that still appear in inbox)
3. go to SWWL, choose type and status with "*" and put the date of creation date of workflow
4. choose work ID
5. delete
hope it helps

About workflow problem in 4.6C for PR

Hello Expert:
i met a quesiton about the workflow for PR in 4.6C.
the detail is as following.
The requestor created a PR for waiting for approve, there are 3 approvor to handle the PR.
maybe the second approvor modified the quantity or amount of the PR before release, but system seems can't trigger the new workflow to go back to first approver in 4.6C. So once the second approvor released the modified PR, then the PR will go to next approver. Now my requirement is to hope the workflow can get back to start point for waiting for approval. or could i close the PR completely.
even i am cancelled the PR, the purchasing group can generate new PO with the cancelled PR as well.
Did you face the same problem in 4.6C workflow?
hope to get your help
Thanks in advance
Kevin

Hello Kevin,
you can find this setting in the customizing tree:
I assume that you're using purchase requisition item based released based on classification
MM>Purch.>Req>Rel.Proc.>with class. -->Set up procedure with classification
Push "Release indicator"
Select the release indicator that blocks your PO (e.g. X blocked)
Using the SAP Standard only you have the following two choices that makes the most sense:
- Changebility = 1 i.e. cannot be changed
- Changebility = 4 and Value change = 0,00   i.e. changeable and new release on value change
The first option locks the requisition for any changes at all, forcing your purchasing group to re-create the PR once it should be changed.
The second option allows any change, but when the value is touched in any way (+/- 0%) all previously given release codes will be reset making the release all-over again.
I tip that the second option is the one you're looking for.
If both option are not workable for your requirement, you have to create an additional event (as one of the previous contributors Aditya already mentioned), which could be restricted to the fields that you want your requisition to reset with.
Then you have to throw in an event coupling where you use as a receiver event function module a custom-made function module that runs through the release codes of the requisition to reset all releases. This is done using the function module BAPI_REQUISITION_RESET_RELEASE. If you're choosing this way, I propose that you go a bit forward and open a new thread. But I remember that I was proposing this solution a couple of months ago. So maybe searching the forum could be a good idea then.
With the very best wishes,
   Florin
Edited by: Florin Wach on Mar 4, 2009 6:03 PM:   The proposed paths also apply to all versions >= 4.6B

The user does not exist or is not unique - workflow problem

I am using Solution Starters Dynamic Management workflow on my Project Server 2010. I was working fine for a year now, but today all workflows were broken when someone tried to submit them to a next stage. "Workflow terminated. An error has occurred
in the workflow."
I tried debbuging the workflow and it seems to be OK, but the problem appears when it needs to assign tasks to the approvers (they are in the Approvers group). When I remove users from the group that represents approvers (and leave that group empty), it
works fine, so I am guessing that users (who need to approve the stage) are the problem. My administrators are saying that there were no updates or changes on AD machine.
I don't have problem with users in any of people picker fields or anywhere else on the site. I am using claims auth.
What could be the reason for this behavior??
These are main errors from the log:
Failed to persist workflow instance: 7dc2e035-cd02-4284-b851-a829e372a809 with error code: 5, instance data size: 29578, internal state: Running, processing id: 1e2211d2-ef7b-4416-90ef-ac041396c200   2f83db27-34da-4275-a42e-0625240af921
The user does not exist or is not unique.
WinWF Internal Error, terminating workflow Id# 7dc2e035-cd02-4284-b851-a829e372a809
System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException: Specified argument was out of the range of valid values. Parameter name: additionalNodes     at Microsoft.Office.Workflow.Actions.OfficeTask.ProcessTaskError(Object sender, EventArgs e)
at System.Workflow.ComponentModel.ActivityExecutorDelegateInfo`1.ActivityExecutorDelegateOperation.Run(IWorkflowCoreRuntime workflowCoreRuntime)     at System.Workflow.Runtime.Scheduler.Run()

It appears that this isn't the problem with users, but it is a problem with Office Tasks. This is the main error in ULS logs (same as in the previous post):
"Specified argument was out of the range of valid values. Parameter name: additionalNodes"
I noticed that all content types are gone from my pwa site. Is it possible that my workflow is causing problems when adding tasks because somebody deleted all content types??

Workflow problem

Hi! I am working in SRM 5.0 with Server 5.5 and I have a problem with the workflow approval...
I activate the workflow WS 10400010 without approval. And when I go to confirm the good, the workflow trows an error message that the workflow not started. It has errors.
I go to the transaction SWUD, put WS 10400010 and press test environment.
With the object BUS2203 simulate event, and the WS10400010 start, but the WS10000197 have an error: Workflow definition not activated. Link to event is desactived.
In the transaction SWI1, I see my workflow error, and when I list the technical details, the system throw errors:
- Exception ocurred: Error when starting work item 000000066649
- Process Node: Error when processing node ´0000000007´(ParForEach index 000000
- Create: Error when creating a component of type step
- Create_with_handle: Error when creating a work item
- Create_via_wfm: Unable to determine work item type for step at node 0000000007
What can I do?? I suppose this error is a workflow error
Thanks
Rose

Hi Rosa,
I m using ECC 6.0 SAP, and while executing the workflow i am receiving following error message
Result Processing : Error during result processing of work item 000000009132
PROCESS_NODE : Error when processing node '0000000014' (ParForEach index 000000)
CREATE : Error when creating a component of type 'Step'
CREATE_WIM_HANDLE : Error when creating a work item
CREATE_VIA_WFM : Unable to determine work item type for step at node 0000000014
Please guide me on that ..
Thanks and Regards..

N-Level Contract Approval (workflow problem)

Hello friends,
                    We are using SRM 5.0 , ECS scenario.. My problem is related to N-level contract approval. I had activated workflow WS 14000148 for N-level approval.. In development system it is working fine but in production system I am facing following errors after first release of contract.
      Executed Auction             Error Message
Exception occurred        Error when starting work item
                                  000000008004
PROCESS_NODE      Error when processing
                                 node '0000000007'
          (ParForEach index 000000)
CREATE          Error when creating a
                                component of type 'Step'
CREATE_WIM_HANDLE   Error when creating a work
                                       item
CREATE_VIA_WFM           Error within method
                     CL_SWF_RUN_WIM_FACTORY-
                    >CREATE_VIA_WFM
GET_WITYPE        Unable to determine work item
                             type for step at node                        0000000007
GET_TASK_HANDLE         Error when loading task
                                    WS14000085
FIND_BY_WFDWIZ         Workflow definition of
                                    task 'WS14000085'
                                    cannot be Activated
         Sub-workflow WS14000085 available in main workflow WS 14000075 which is deactivated. But problem is when I am trying to see workflow WS14000085 through SWDD in production, no workflow is there but same workflow I can see in Development system. Any expert have any idea why same workflow I can see in development but I am not able to see in Production system.
Thanks in advance.
Abhijeet Panse

Hi,
It looks workflow template is missing.
Please check the note 962488 "Workflow definition '&' not in version '&'".
1. Run the function module SWD_WFD_REPLICATE_FROM_9999 and copy it.
2. Re-activate the WF definitions in the transaction SWDD
3. Check Consistency in the transaction SWUD
Also check the sub workflow.
Regards,
Masa

SWFVISU entry for Travel workflow

Hi Experts,
I have copied the standard travel request workflow & customized it. For approval I have user decision step & all the tasks used in my workflow are custom ones. There are no std tasks. Currently when I open the workitem from UWL i see that R3 screen is opened. I understand that SWFVISU entry for my task is missing. Can you please tell me what are the details that I have to give for my task.

Hi,
The Custom Dialog Task No. you have to assign.
1) Go to std. Workflow note all the Std. Task Maintain in SWFVISU, Note all the Parameters
2) Similarly for the Respective Custom Task, Assign the Same for your Custom Workflow.
Regards,
Surjith

Need to send HTML email from Workflow : problem with sender

Hi all,
i need to send HTML email from my Workflow. I did it but i have a problem with the sender. The sender of email is always the agent responsible of workitem, and i don't want the receiver can answer to sender. So i need to put a false email address like nosender.at.mycustomer.com.
Possible to do that ?
Thanks for your help.
Cheers

Hi rick
How to change the wf-batch to some other name as you mention in previous reply. Can you give some details of that. If i use the function module SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1 how to change the wf-batch name and if i use send mail step in my workflow how to change wf-batch name.
Regards
vijay

Process rule and provisioning workflow problem

Hi,
we have designed a workflow to provision groups from a database resource to ldap and AD resources. We use the process rule in the activesync process. These groups creation
works without problem now, but the update/creation of users from database don't work. In my workflow I try to use the workflow services provision and reprovision, the result it's ok, but nothing is updated in my AD and ldap.
I have read in an old post that, in the process rule, the activesync offer a user view variable, but I don't receive nothing, and then I need to do a getview and then pass this view to the
reprovision rule. This don't work.
how is the correct process to reprovision from a process rule, and when we need to create a new user, from where I could get a userview for the provision process?
Thanks

Why do your supervisor start giving you such works until they don't give some trainings on IDM to you ?
Need Approval process workflow?
Re: Approval Process
Forum is for Freshers too but people are using it for just completing their project not for learning/sharing.

Travel workflow problems.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for