Trigger workflow for all tcodes with set transaction GS01

Hi,
There are nearly 7 tcodes in FI maintained in the set tranasction using GS01 and we desire to trigger worklfow for all those tcodes, even if another one is added in future. What is the process to go about?
Regards

Hi,
Thanks for the concern.
The tcodes are SAP standard tcodes like fb50 and others for document park and post. Now the requirement is that, the set of tcodes maintained in set transaction GS01, say 7 SAP standard tcodes maintained, the workflow should trigger whenever someone parks or posts a document, which must be subsequently approved by a set of approvers and then the actual release and posting(or re-posting) takes place.
How can i achieve this using workflow, precisely to trigger worklfow for al those tcodes, now at a later date the tcodes can be either reduced or added to the set.
Best Regards
Partha Kar

Similar Messages

How to trigger workflow for already created purchase order ?

HELLO EXPERTS
let me clear my scenario first . i have 1 purchase order whose workflow is not triggered . means it is showing me message no workflow that have already worked for this object.i have created 1 more purchase order taking reference of this purchase order means both are same same message for this po also. it was happening because event linkage for the business object bus2012 is not activated but now it is enabled and i have created third purchase order with reference to above po means this third po is also same as above 2 no change other than po number but for this workdflow is getting triggered . now i want to trigger workflow for orignal first po but for my first po it is showing me same message that no workflow that have already worked for this object. what i have to do to trigger workflow for this po. i have performed this steps in test system. i have workflow number

Hello !
      You can trigger the workflow from SWUE.Enter bus2012 and created for object type and event respectively.
      Click object key button where enter the purchase order number which have been already created.
      But, why do you want to trigger the workflow again for already created purchase order ?
Regards,
S.Suresh

Email Notifications through workflow for all Approved and Rejected Orders

hi,
i have to send Email Notifications through workflow for all Approved and Rejected Orders to the user who have submitted the order for approval.how could it be done.please send ur solutions.
regards
yesukannan

Hi,
An option would be use Oracle Alert. Create an event based alert on the table where you have order approvals or rejections. This alert will be raised after inserting or updating this table. Create an action linked to this alert, and choose message as action type.
This setup can be done under Alert Manager Responsibility.
Regards,
Ketter Ohnes

IPhoto frustrating error..The volume for "Df23.JPG" cannot be found. It prompts for all photos with this issue rather than offering an option to ignore. I can find the images in spotlight but not in Find Photo. Does anyone have a solution

iPhoto frustrating error..The volume for "Df23.JPG" cannot be found. It prompts for all photos with this issue rather than offering an option to ignore. I can find the images in spotlight but not in Find Photo. Does anyone have a solution?

Unless you have the source files that were on the TC or Windows machine you will have to start over with a new library as follows:
Start over from scratch with new library
Start over with a new library and import the Originals (iPhoto 09 and earlier) or the Masters (iPhoto 11) folder from your original library as follows:
1. Move the existing library folder to the desktop.
2. Open the library package like this.
Click to view full size
3. Launch iPhoto and, when asked, select the option to create a new library.
4. Drag the Masters (iPhoto 11) folder from the iPhoto Library on the desktop into the open iPhoto window.
Click to view full size
This will create a new library with the same Events as the original library but will not keep the metadata, albums, books slideshows and other projects. Your original library will remain intact for further attempts at fixes is so desired.
OT

For All Entries with two tables

Hi All,
         Can we use FOR ALL ENTRIES with two tables. for example
SELECT * FROM MKPF INTO TABLE T_MKPF
         WHERE BUDAT IN S_BUDAT.
SELECT * FROM MARA INTO TABLE T_MARA
         WHERE MTART IN S_MTART AND
                        MAKTL IN S_MAKTL.
SELECT * FROM MSEG INTO TABLE T_MSEG
       FOR ALL ENTRIES IN "T_MKPF AND T_MARA"
              WHERE MBLNR EQ T_MKPF-MBLNR AND
                             MATNR EQ T_MARA-MATNR.
can we do it like this or any other way to do this plz tell. I waitting for your responce.
Thanks
Jitendra

Hi,
u cannot do like this....chek some documentation on it..
1. duplicate rows are automatically removed
2. if the itab used in the clause is empty , all the rows in the source table will be selected .
3. performance degradation when using the clause on big tables.
Say for example you have the following abap code:
Select * from mara
For all entries in itab
Where matnr = itab-matnr.
If the actual source of the material list (represented here by itab) is actually another database table, like:
select matnr from mseg
into corresponding fields of table itab
where .
Then you could have used one sql statement that joins both tables.
Select t1.*
From mara t1, mseg t2
Where t1.matnr = t2.matnr
And T2..
So what are the drawbacks of using the "for all entires" instead of a join ?
At run time , in order to fulfill the "for all entries " request, the abap engine will generate several sql statements (for detailed information on this refer to note 48230). Regardless of which method the engine uses (union all, "or" or "in" predicates) If the itab is bigger then a few records, the abap engine will break the itab into parts, and rerun an sql statement several times in a loop. This rerun of the same sql statement , each time with different host values, is a source of resource waste because it may lead to re-reading of data pages.
returing to the above example , lets say that our itab contains 500 records and that the abap engine will be forced to run the following sql statement 50 times with a list of 10 values each time.
Select * from mara
Where matnr in ( ...)
Db2 will be able to perform this sql statement cheaply all 50 times, using one of sap standard indexes that contain the matnr column. But in actuality, if you consider the wider picture (all 50 executions of the statement), you will see that some of the data pages, especially the root and middle-tire index pages have been re-read each execution.
Even though db2 has mechanisms like buffer pools and sequential detection to try to minimize the i/o cost of such cases, those mechanisms can only minimize the actual i/o operations , not the cpu cost of re-reading them once they are in memory. Had you coded the join, db2 would have known that you actually need 500 rows from mara, it would have been able to use other access methods, and potentially consume less getpages i/o and cpu.
In other words , when you use the "for all entries " clause instead of coding a join , you are depriving the database of important information needed to select the best access path for your application. Moreover, you are depriving your DBA of the same vital information. When the DBA monitors & tunes the system, he (or she) is less likely to recognize this kind of resource waste. The DBA will see a simple statement that uses an index , he is less likely to realize that this statement is executed in a loop unnecessarily.
Beore using the "for all entries" clause and to evaluate the use of database views as a means to:
a. simplify sql
b. simplify abap code
c. get around open sql limitations.
check the links
http://www.thespot4sap.com/articles/SAPABAPPerformanceTuning_ForAllEntries.asp
The specified item was not found.
Regards,
Nagaraj

For all entries with inner join

Hi All,
I found some unusual thing.
i have written INNERJOIN along with FOR ALL ENTRIES and also INNERJOIN in loop..endloop. I have tested both programs with around 1000 records, i found that INNERJOIN with FOR ALL ENTRIES is taking more time compared to the other one. As we know FOR ALL ENTRIES with SIMPLE SELECT takes less time compared to select in loop..endloop. Anybody tell me is there any specific reason for this
thanks in advance
rajavardhana reddy

Have a look at this weblog by Dharmaveer Singh:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/2986 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
Sudha

How to set permissions like "For all users" with Sandbox

Hello!
Hello!
I am using Sandbox for Mac OS X Leopard and I've got a question to you:
How can I set up a folder to behave like the For all users folder in the users directory?
Greetings

Well, sandbox sets ACL's not posix permissions. The sticky bit is a posix permission. Sand box will allow you to do something similar to the sticky bit using ACL's, but the exact duplication of the sticky bit is not possible, but something just as useful or more useful can be easily implemented.
To set the sticky bit you will need an app called FileXaminer or the Terminal.app command line.
to set the sticky bit simply put "1" in front of the the permissions number when you run chmod on the command line, here is an example:
chmod 1775 /users/data/shared #assigns permissions 775 and the sticky bit#
chmod 775 /users/data/shared #assigns permissions 775 without the sticky bit#
note: note actual use of the chmod and chown commands will, in most cases require the sudo (super user do) command to be used with them. example:
sudo chmod 1775 /users/data/shared #assigns temporary super user priviledge#
The way I set my shared user's directories with ACL's is this:
first I created folder /users/data -permissions=777 (everyone).
I had three users so I created folders for each in /users/data:
/users/data/user1 #this is just example-substitute real user name#
/users/data/user2
/users/data/user3 #etc,etc,#
set the posix permission on each user folder 700 (owner:read,write,execute)
set the owner and group on each one accordingly:
chown user1:staff /users/data/user1 #substitute real user name#
chown user2:staff /users/data/user2
chown user3:staff /users/data/user3 #(etc,etc)#
Now each user has their own data folder they can read and write to at will (when they are logged in to their user account).
They can safely create and maintain their data and no one can delete it.
Since these are shared data accounts. other users will need to read the data, this is where the ACL's come in.
You will need to use Sandbox to place ACL's for each allowed user, on each of the user directories:
0: user:joe inherited allow list,addfile,search,add_subdirectory,readattr,writeattr,readextattr,writeextattr,readsec urity,file_inherit,directoryinherit
1: user:mary inherited allow list,addfile,search,add_subdirectory,readattr,writeattr,readextattr,writeextattr,readsec urity,file_inherit,directoryinherit
2: user:sue inherited allow list,addfile,search,add_subdirectory,readattr,writeattr,readextattr,writeextattr,readsec urity,file_inherit,directoryinherit
Basically with the above ACL's the only thing the allowed user can't do is delete files. They can copy files, they can add files, etc. This behavior is somewhat similar to what can be accomplished with the sticky bit, but much more controlled and structured. That is the beauty of using ACL's.
Using SandBox you can taylor the permissions as you see fit for each every user. You can set permissions for an administrator to delete files as well. You can take away or add permissions for each user as you see fit. let your imagination be your guide.
ACL's weren't meant to replace posix permissions, but rather to allow administrators to fine tune user permissions.
Kj

Read this for all having problem setting up Routers with Broadband Modems

I have used Netgear and Linksys for years now, but hadn't setup a new router for a while. Hence, struggled installing a new Airport Extreme to replace my Linksys Router which was not providing enough signal strength for my Mac Mini based iTunes database to stream to my Apple TV wirelessly. Here is what I did finally to resolve the issue:
My setup: Arris TM502G broadband modem provided by Comcast
1. I kept the old router powered up and removed the WAN connection from it and connected it to the AE.
2. After I installed the Airport Utility, I powered up the AE and let it go thru the installation process and allowed it to pick up the settings from the old router. This step is simple and can be done manually.
3. After that the struggle began as "Renew DHCP" wouldn't get me a valid 71.xxx.xxx.xxx series IP address from the Modem. I read all the posts (and felt the same pain as others). Saw very helpful posts with good intention to help others like "remove the power", "remove the battery from the modem", "let it sit without power for 24hrs", etc.. I couldn't use some of these suggestions as my house will be without an internet connection for a long time.
4. Finally, I pressed the "Reset" switch behind the modem for a few seconds until all but the power indicator had turned off indicating a reset. Once it came up and all the LEDs were lit, a few seconds later the LED on the AE turned solid Green indicating success. Looked at the Airport Utility and indeed it had got the new IP address.
There are not too many broadband modem manufacturers and so it shouldn't be too difficult to publish the installation procedure under FAQ on Apple support website for all the modems that Apple's test team has tested with. It could save a lot of grief. Even for a geek like me, I had to burn the midnight oil.
PS: My Apple TV is now streaming the movies/tv shows/home videos from my Mac Mini smoothly. That was the reason I purchased this expensive router. And I found the "guest access" feature which I wasn't aware of. Excellent feature to let my son's friends hook up their laptops during a study/school project session without letting them access our other home computers.

do you mean to see that the XP machine is working as a VPN server ?? if yes then you need not require to forward ports on the router...the laptop should be able to connect to the VPN server remotely ..
if not , then connect the VPN server directly to the modem and check whether you can connect to the VPN server remotely from the router ..

For all entries with large sets

Hello All,
Does for all entries have restriction that the itab should not exceed the maximum entries? Look at code below:
select pernr raufpl raplzl catshours
         from catsdb
         into corresponding fields of table lit_catshrs
         for all entries in itab
         where pernr = itab-pernr
           and status in ('10', '20', '30')
           and workdate in s_date.
if itab have 7000 entries in production system, will the select statement cause a short dump such as DBIF_RSQL_INVALID_RSQL?
Thanks,
Alex M

Hi,
check the sequence of the fields in the internal table lit_catshrs
Because RSQL error occurs because of this.
and Whenevr you use for all entries of some Internal Table it is a must to check that
IF not ITAB[] Is initial.
< write the select>
endif.
Other performance related thing w.r.t to ABAP are
1) Dont use nested seelct statement
2) If possible use for all entries in addition
3) In the where addition make sure you give all the primary key
4) Use Index for the selection criteria.
5) You can also use inner joins
6) You can try to put the data from the first select statement into an Itab and then in order to select the data from the second table use for all entries in.
7) Use the runtime analysis SE30 and SQL Trace (ST05) to identify the performance and also to identify where the load is heavy, so that you can change the code accordingly
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5d0db4c9-0e01-0010-b68f-9b1408d5f234
reward if useful
regards,
Anji

Trigger workflow for MIRO invoice creation

Hello,
In standard functionning it is not possible to trigger the workflow for documents coming from MM.
When using transaction MIRO and selecting invoice creation the created document has following value :
BKPF-AWTYP = 'RMRP'. whereas creating it from FB60 results to BKPF-AWTYP = 'BKPF'.
The problem is standard code checks AWTYP is not equal to 'RMRP' before creating event to start the standard workflow for invoice validation.
Question : why sap doesn't allow workflow creation for invoices from MIRO?
Thanks for your answers.
Best regards,
Laurent.

Hi,
here they are...
WS20000397 MMIVBlockedP Treatment of inv. blkd for price, Log.IV
WS20001004 MMIVToRel Release the Completed Log. IV Document
WS00400026 MMIVquantity Treatment inv.blocked f.quantity reasons
WS20001003 MMIVToCompl Complete the Parked Log. IV Document
WS00400027 MMIVprice Treatment invoic.blocked f.price reasons
All of these workflows are a one-step / one-level of approval and needs some workflow configuration at least for the agent assignments. For a full-blown workflow you should take these workflows as an example, how you could work with it.
The last two workflows work with preliminary posting on the miro (transaction MIR7).
Best regards,
Florin

Report for CS15 tcode with multiple material nos. in selection screen.

I want to develop a report for cs15 but with multiple materials.
Like in cs15 we enter the material and its plant, then click on multi level check box and get the output. But cs15 works only for a single material. I want to develop a report in which i'll give multiple material nos. and then i should get the output for each material entered just as the output that would appear in cs15 for that material.
How do i do it.
I have tried but i'm not able to track back.

Hi Priti,
try develop a interactive report which lists all the materials in the first screen and when you double click on each of the material then call transaction CS15 output by skipping the first screen .Use set parameter to pass the material .
Regards,
Sirisha

Creating Workflows for a Corporation with Different Company Codes

Hi,
We have just done a roll-out for Company A which is part of a big corporation (group of companies).
The system version implemented is ECC 6.0 with modules (HR,MM,FI,DBM)
I have implemented and rolled out several workflows (Leave,PR,PO, Payment approval)for Company A and am now expected to do the same workflows for Company B,the business processes as per flowcharts remain the same as for Company A.
Company A uses company code 1000, while company B will use company code 2000.
Users in Company B will log in to the same PRD servers.
Some approvers of workflow in company A will be responsible for some workflow approvals for staff in company B though HR have completed implementing an org structure for company B.
Is it possible to use the same workflow templates by saving them in a different name and change the agents to reflect company B org,if so how do I go about it?
In future we will also roll-out to Company C.
What is the best way to do it and save time as well.
Thank you.
Missa

Hi
Consider a scenario like EMPB who belongs to CMP B has applied a leave and EMPA manager of EMPB who belongs to CMP A,
Now in order to send the leave request for approval to EMPA you can define or create a rule from PFAC transaction. in such a way that
1. First try to get the initiator details like his personnel number.
2. Once you have the Employee number , by using it you can read hi Org Assignment details from PA0001 to get employee sepecifc compnay code.
3. BAsed on the employee group and sub group you might have to decide who is manager I hope this would be defined already in the org structure.
4. Once you know who is the manager , get his position details and from it get holder and his communications info from PA0105.
IN this way if you define a rule by calling a function module. You can make use of the same workflow. but based on the initiator details you need to dort out the manager.
The simple way is to define and impement the Rules dynamically to fetch the agents based on the Personel are/sub are and employee group and sub group.
Regards
Pavan

Inner join and select for all entries with respect to performance

Hi Friends,
I just want to know which is more efficient with respect to performance the Inner join or select for all entries?which is more efficient? and how? can you explain me in detail ?
Regards,
Dinesh

INNER JOIN->
The data that can be selected with a view depends primarily on whether the view implements an inner join or an outer join. With an inner join, you only get the records of the cross-product for which there is an entry in all tables used in the view. With an outer join, records are also selected for which there is no entry in some of the tables used in the view.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/cf/21ec77446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm
FOR ALL ENTRIES->
Outer join can be created using this addition to the where clause in a select statement. It speeds up the performance tremendously, but the cons of using this variation are listed below
Duplicates are automatically removed from the resulting data set. Hence care should be taken that the unique key of the detail line items should be given in the select statement.
If the table on which the For All Entries IN clause is based is empty, all rows are selected into the destination table. Hence it is advisable to check before-hand that the first table is not empty.
If the table on which the For All Entries IN clause is based is very large, the performance will go down instead of improving. Hence attempt should be made to keep the table size to a moderate level.
Not Recommended
Loop at int_cntry.
Select single * from zfligh into int_fligh
where cntry = int_cntry-cntry.
Append int_fligh.
Endloop.
Recommended
Select * from zfligh appending table int_fligh
For all entries in int_cntry
Where cntry = int_cntry-cntry.

Automatic start workflow for ALL records

Hi Experts,
Does anyone know a way to start workflow automatically for ALL records without human interference?
I want to start workflows every day. For instance to recalculate, re-validate, re-assign or syndicate ALL records of a table.
Kind regards,
Job Jansen

Hello Job Jansen
I suppose recalculate and validate all recodrs once a day don't make sense when that records is the same
and records wasn't changing
However, you can use Autolaunch = Threshold with Max Time = 24 hour(for example)
workflow will fire when Max Time say greater then time last launched job.
And few another ways:
1) you can use task sheduler for launch import manager and turn autolaunch workflow when it do import
2) turn automatic import process(MDIS) once a day and use workflow for add records
3) developed Java application which used MDM JAVA API for start workflow
Regards
Kanstantsin

SAP Standard Workflow for PR Release (with user exit)

Hi SAP WF Gurus,
Good day!
I just wanted to check with you if you have ever used a user exit in the activation of the standard workflow for PR (overall ( release. What we have is a two0step approval process wherein each level has a proxy/alternate approver. We used the available user exit to accommodate this customer requirement since the standard release would only allow us to define 1 approver as a prerequisite for the next level. We were able to execute this on the first level approval; however, we observed that the workflow is not anymore triggered (i.e. does not send work items to agents) for the level 2 release. My questions therefore are:
1. How to set up SWEC? I already executed SWELS and SWEL to check if the events are being created and event linkage is automatically deactivated after running into an error regarding the binding...My initial SWEC setup is for BANF BUS2105 RELEASED On Change. I am assuming that since the workflow was released from the first level, this should be the starting point
2. How to rectify the binding error? I already executed automatic binding in the WF header for the start events but still face it
Your inputs/comments are most welcome
Regards,
DeLo

Just to add:
The error that I am encountering in the second run/cycle for the PR approval workflow is Import container contains errors (are any obligatory elements missing?)
Basically, WS20000077 will be executed if an approval level is seen. Once the approval is made, then the workflow is also completed. However, for multiple approvers, I only get to execute successfully the first level approval. The succeeding levels are encountering errors as stated above

Trigger workflow for all tcodes with set transaction GS01

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for