TS20000168 workflow sent to all users

Hi all,
I need help with the following problem:
I have set up TS20000168 (mm_po_ok) for workflow notification to be sent when the release of a purchase order is effected. For the activity "Release of purchase order effected", I have already set the agent using the expression &_WF_INITIATOR&.
However, when the workflow is triggered, all my users, instead of only the initiator, will get a similar message in their inbox. Why is this so? Is there something I should look out for?
Any form of help is appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Cheers,
Daniel

Hi,
I am using the same workflow it working fine.
1) Check it is general Task, if you developing in one client and testing in another client, then in the testing client check whether it is general Task
2) Check the binding is as below,
Workflow to Task
&RELEASECODE& -
> &RELEASECODE&
&PURCHASEORDER& -
> &_WI_OBJECT_ID&
Task to workflow
&PURCHASEORDER& -
> &_WI_OBJECT_ID&
3) Then Save & activate and test the workflow
4) If still same problem, check any authorization issue.
Regards,
Surjith

Similar Messages

Where do I put a workflow so that all users on the Mac can access?

Where do I put a workflow so that all users on the Mac can access it from Automator?
Also. why does the search pattern "users" AND "workflows" return results whitch math "and" (lowercase)? I thought "AND" (in caps) is for boolean searches.

Hi, Mike.
1. You wrote: "Where do I put a workflow so that all users on the Mac can access it from Automator?"Either:
• Macintosh HD > Users > Shared
• Macintosh HD > Applications (if you're the Admin user).
All users (unless restricted by Parental Controls) have access to those folders.
2. You wrote: "Also. why does the search pattern "users" AND "workflows" return results whitch math "and" (lowercase)? I thought "AND" (in caps) is for boolean searches."It's unclear as to what search facility you are referring, and a bit hard to follow given the spelling errors in your question.
Do you mean Discussions search? If so, have you reviewed the Search Tips? They're also available from the search page, where one can click "Tips" under the Search Terms field.
Good luck!
Dr. Smoke
Author: Troubleshooting Mac® OS X

SharePoint: Workflow to retrieve all users and Create list item record for each user

Hi all,
My share point site have two Lists as Holidays and MyCalender.
Actually Holiday is simple non-Calender list with field as Holiday Date, Reason. MyCalender List Calender type list with Person Look-up column and user can see his own record. User of Manager group will declare holiday. This Holiday should get reflected
on each user 's MyCalender List.[One listitem as holiday date and reason for each user] so everyone can view that record.
I have requirement as Manager will create one Holiday record and then run single workflow so for all users present in SharePoint Site, one MyCalender List Item record should get created. Is it possible to do using Workflow?? Please help as I didn't get any
solution for this.. Thanks in advance!

You don't need one workflow per user when a filtered view can do this for you. If the manager's list is the parent calendar, I'm assuming that he'll be at least using the person look-up column.
Whether this feeds through the MyCalendar or stays where it is, you can use the [Me] parameter within the filter on a new view. This will then return the assigned holiday filtering against the account that is logged in.
Steven Andrews
SharePoint Business Analyst: LiveNation Entertainment
Blog: baron72.wordpress.com
Twitter: Follow @backpackerd00d
My Wiki Articles:
CodePlex Corner Series
Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves (or helps) your problem.

Notification sent to all users in a role when some of them responded in first reminde

Hi,
We have a workflow using (voteforresult, standard voting method) sending notifications to users via role. Sends first notification times out sends second one. If some users responded to notification in first email it still sends email to all users second time. Is it not suppose to send email only to
users who hasn't responded.
Example: ROLE01 has USER01, USER02, USER03. Sends email to all three, USER01 responds
after first timeout cancellation is sent to USER02 & USER03 and new notification (second one)
to all three even though USER01 has responded.
thanks,
Sridhar.

Hi Mark,
Thanks very much for response.
Does post notification function also resolves who has responded first time in a role and sends
notification only to others. Like in the example below
Example: ROLE01 has USER01, USER02, USER03. Sends email to all three, USER01 responds,
after first timeout cancellation is sent to USER02 & USER03 and second notification
to all three even though USER01 has responded. What we are looking for is sending
second notification only to USER02, USER03 who has not responded first time.
If there is a standard package or an example which i can look at would of great help.
thanks again,
Sridhar.
See the Workflow Guide on Post Notification Functions:
You can associate a post-notification function with a notification activity. The Workflow Engine executes the post-notification function in response to an update of the notification's state after the notification is delivered. For example, you can specify a post-notification function that executes when the notification recipient forwards or transfers the notification. The post-notification function could perform back-end logic to either validate the legitimacy of the forward/transfer or execute some other supporting logic.
If a notification activity times out, the Workflow Engine runs the post-notification function for the activity in TIMEOUT mode. For a Voting activity, the TIMEOUT mode logic should identify how to tally the votes received up until the timeout.
Hi,
We have a workflow using (voteforresult, standard voting method) sending notifications to users via role. Sends first notification times out sends second one. If some users responded to notification in first email it still sends email to all users second time. Is it not suppose to send email only to
users who hasn't responded.
Example: ROLE01 has USER01, USER02, USER03. Sends email to all three, USER01 responds
after first timeout cancellation is sent to USER02 & USER03 and new notification (second one)
to all three even though USER01 has responded.
thanks,
Sridhar.

Create workflow to email all users added to a sharepoint list when a document is created / modified

Hello,
I need to have a list, lets call it List A, that is used as a collection of users which will recieve an email when a document that is added or modified in a different library, Library A. Essentially I want the workflow to parse all of the users added
to List A and email them upon the modification or addition of a document to Library A.
I know how to setup the email but i dont know how to parse the list and create a dataset of all the users so i can set that in the To field of the email.
thank you,
Marc

Hi Marc,
As I understand, you have a list to store user accounts, and you would like to send email to the user accounts in this list via a workflow associated with another library.
In my test, I didn't get all values of person or group value of all items in a list which is used to store user accounts.
I'd recommend you use a SharePoint group to replace the function of the list which store user accounts. Then in the workflow, you could send email to this group and the message will be sent to indivisual members of this group.
Please refer to the screenshot below to add SharePoint group to email To box:
Regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected] .
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Rule returns no agent and workitem sent to all users

Hi,
In my workflow I have defined a rule fot a workitem. The task is general task. When this rule does not return a possible agent system is sending workitem to all the users in the system.
I tried to make the task general forwarding not allowed, then the workitem is not triggered saying no agent assigned though my rule results in an agent.
I can give a user of workflow administrator or dummy user in rule - function module. But what is the standard way of solving this issue. I was expecting the workflow to go into error mode when my rule - function module returns no agent instead its going to the inbox of all users in the system.
Please advise.
Best Regards,
Aleem Mohiuddin.

In PFAC ubder Rule definition tab...
You have a chck box for "Terminate if rule resolution without result"
Please cheeck this and try.

GWCHECK was sent to all users

Hi All,
Yesterday I ran a GWCHECK to use the GWMBSIZE utility on the log file.
Options selected were:
Analyze/Fix DB
Contents
Collect Stats
Databases checked were User and Message
I set the results to go to administrator and our helpdesk account.
This morning I came in to find all the users had received the log of their individual mailboxes in their mailboxes.
Thats never happened before. Any ideas on what went wrong or why it happened?
Thanks
Dave

On 14.02.2011 23:36, dwiseman2 wrote:
>
> I set the results to go to administrator and our helpdesk account.
And you activated the checkbox "individual user". BTDTGTT. That checkbox
does exactly that, send the result to each user for that a check is
done. Many people (including myself once in a while), believe it has to
be checked to be able to specify specific additional accounts where the
results shold be sent to. That's not the case.
CU,
Massimo Rosen
Novell Product Support Forum Sysop
No emails please!
http://www.cfc-it.de

Send notification to all users of specific responsibility in 11i

Hi All,
Is there anyway to send notification to all users of specific responsibility in 11i ?
I have a setup form for hierarchy level (e.g level 1 - 5) by which each level will be notified either by responsibility or user?
If its setup by responsibility, notification will be sent to all users under that responsibility.
Do i have to create role using WF_DIRECTORY.CreateAdHocRole and add all users for specific responsibility to the role?
Also if the responsibility setup changed, how to maintain the existing notification with the old resp.
eg. level 1 is set to resp X then later on set to resp Y.
Regards,
Fendy

Use 'Expand Roles' to achieve this. Please check the WF Developers Guide to see how it works.
Yes, you may use wf_directory.createadhocrole for this purpose too.
What do you mean when you say the responsibility has changed? It it is end-dated no notification should be sent to any of its members. It depends on the assignments of the role/user. if the assignment is used then the user will get it. If the assignment is end-dated then the user will not get the notification.
You can always use wf_local_synch.Propagate_user_role to change the assignment of a user/role. If you want to end-date it, you can use it. Or you can add another user to the role, etc.
Hope this helps,
Alejandro

Mail step should be sent to all the users in multiple condition

hi experts,
                  I have a requirement on invoice posting.Say if invoice amount is 1000 then person A can post the invoice.
if >= 1000 person B can post the invoice.
If >=2000 person C can post the invoice.
                                                                  what i have did is, created a multiple condition and then based on the inv amount assigned 3 methods for invoice posting.My problem is if a person posts an invoice amount of 1000.A mail has to be sent to Person B and C informing that an amount of 1000 is posted with user id.Same for person B, ie mail should be sent to person A and C informing regarding invoice posting.Now inside the multiple condition i cannot assign mail step.Coz based on the condition it will go to a particular user for invoice posting but where as mail should be sent to all the users.So how can i achieve this??.

Hi Priyanka,
I am getting 1 thing why you need need multiple conditions. No need to create any multiple conditions.
1. Create a rule using transaction PFAC. (you can use the example as Rule: 0000168).
    a. Create an function module with table parameters as ACTOR_TAB (type SWHACTOR) and AC_CONTAINER (Type
        SWCONT). You can aswell copy the FM used in 168 rule and change it. check the logic mentioned below.
    b. In PFAC transaction, go to container tab and create 2 container elements. For amount and Mail_indicator (type should be
        same as that of the amount field in your workflow) .
2. Use this Rule in your workflow to send mail.
Logic:
""Lokale Schnittstelle:
*"       TABLES
*"              ACTOR_TAB STRUCTURE SWHACTOR
*"              AC_CONTAINER STRUCTURE SWCONT
*"       EXCEPTIONS
*"              NOBODY_FOUND
INCLUDE <CNTAIN>.
DATA BEGIN OF ORG_OBJECT OCCURS 0.
          INCLUDE STRUCTURE SWHACTOR.
DATA END OF ORG_OBJECT.
DATA: BEGIN OF NEW_AC_CONTAINER OCCURS 3.
          INCLUDE STRUCTURE SWCONT.
DATA: END OF NEW_AC_CONTAINER.
DATA: V_AMOUNT TYPE <AMOUNT FIELD>.
DATA: V_MAIL_INDICATOR TYPE <FLAG>.
REFRESH: actor_tab.
Get the org-object under consideration. AMOUNT is the container name defined in your PFTC transaction
SWC_GET_ELEMENT AC_CONTAINER 'AMOUNT' 'V_AMOUNT'.
Get the org-object-type and the org-object id.
SWC_GET_ELEMENT AC_CONTAINER 'MAIL_INDICATOR' V_MAIL_INDICATOR .
Pass the org-object, the org-object-type and the org-object-id
to a new container.
The org object get a new name: ORG_AGENT.
SWC_SET_ELEMENT NEW_AC_CONTAINER 'AMOUNT' 'V_AMOUNT'.
SWC_SET_ELEMENT NEW_AC_CONTAINER 'MAIL_INDICATOR' V_MAIL_INDICATOR .
check for V_AMOUNT and V_MAIL_INDICATOR.
if the v_amount = 1000 .'
if v_mail_indicator = ' '.
    actor_tab-OTYPE = 'US' .
    actor_tab-OBJID = 'SAPUSER1'.
    append actor_tab
else.
    actor_tab-OTYPE = 'US' .
    actor_tab-OBJID = 'SAPUSER2'.
    append actor_tab
    actor_tab-OTYPE = 'US' .
    actor_tab-OBJID = 'SAPUSER3'.
    append actor_tab
endif.
endif.
Similarly write the logic for other conditions.
This way you can use same for different purposes.
If you pass the indicator that means you are sending mail to other approvers for information.
Revert back if u need more help.
Regards,
Gautham

SUS - MM Scenario: notification mail not sent to all Supplier Users

Hi,
we're in a SUS-MM scenario and we publish Purchasing documents (PO and/or SAR) to SUS portal.
The notification mail for new published documents are sent only to the e-mail address of the Supplier (imported from SAP to SUS) which is in the SAP Supplier Master data. But if the Admin supplier creates other users for the supplier (F1 / F2 / F3), the notification mail for new published PO/SAR are not sent to the mail address of F1 / F2 / F3 users. Is it the standard behavior or is there some missing customizing setting missing?
Our customer wants that notification mail are sent to all the mail addresses of the Supplier Users.
Has someone had this kind of requirement? and, if it is not achievable via standard customizing, which could be the right solution to meet this requirement?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
This is a standard SAP process which SAP has provided,
The other way is to develop a custom program,
1) Select the Supplier.
2) Check the available contact persons of the Supplier.
3) When a document is created in ECC (Hope you are in MM-SUS), select the list of contact persons for Supplier. (I assume need a RFC FM to develop to SUS)
4) Send a e-mail to all users linked with this Supplier.
You can find the linked Contact persons in BP transaction and Table BUT000.
Please change the Status of the Issue once your problem solved, other will get benefitted. If possible post the soulution.
Thank you,
Anil

Retrieve all users which is currently participate in a workflow

Hi,
In a workflow, is there any service operation that can retrieve all the user ID or name that is currently participating in a workflow?
Thanks.

Hi Jasmine,
thank you for reply, I have a look at the APIs but have not tried it out yet. It seems that it is used to retrive all user that have participate in the workflow, including those that have finished with their task and those currently working on their task.
Can the API differentiate user that have finshed with task and those that is currently still processing task?
I need to know those that is still processing task, as another process need to send email to those users.
Thanks.

RESUBMIT FM is making disappear from all user's inboxes!

Hello,
I one sent work item to multiple user's inboxes, say users are A, B and C.
I placed some validation function behind the ACCEPT button, the moment user clicks the ACCEPT button then my validation will trigger
Say, user B clicked the ACCEPT button and my validation got triggered and returned the FAILURE output for this work item for this user B, hence now programitically I need to make disappear / delete this work item from user B's inbox, but still should remain in other rest of the user's (A and C) inboxes, so that they hv a chance to accept it
I tried FMs of *RESUBMIT* and *DELETE*, but they are resubmitting / deleting from all user's inboxes!
Pls. let me know how can I achieve my requirement
Thank you

I agree, we don't have a dedicated / workflow expert in our company, hence we disigned wrongly.
But, its close to move to PRD, hence we don't want to change design & their dependency other ABP objects
Hence, we do it in this way that, if user_B validation fails, we want disppear WI only from current B user's inbox.
So, what i understood from your suggestion is that, if my validation fails, then in next routine, I need to add B user ID in exclude list by using a CONTAINER change FM, right
if not, pls. help us step by step, also let us know FM for excluding the B user
Thank you

Can an email be sent to multiple users related to an activity?

Hi,
Is it possible to automatically send and email to all the users who have been added from the Users related information section in an appointment? It should work such that everytime I modify the appointment/task, and email notification is sent to all the users in that list notifying that an update has been made to the appointment.
I tried to use workflows but there doen't seem to be an option to send email to all the users associated to appointment.
Regards,

Not possible directly through workflow email. You could use integration events and web services to retrieve the list of users and their email addresses and use an external email system to send the email.

How do I make automator services available to all user accounts?

I wrote an automator script and made it a service (the standard one that shows all hidden files, or un-shows all hidden files) and I'd like to make it a system-wide service so all user accounts on my Mac can use it.
I'd prefer to not log in to each account to set it up as I feel that would waste space (I know, not much is needed) but more importantly if I have to change the script I only have to do it in one place.
How do I do this?
I have other scripts I'd like to make available to all too.
I'm currently running OS X 10.9.5 on a 2008 (not Pro) MacBook core 2 duo.

Thank you, Frank. I'm aware of the packages but didn't realize how it all applied.
I didn't post if it worked for other user accounts because at the time, I didn't know. It was late when I got it working for my primary account and decided to check it later, which I did this morning, and the services did show up for the other accounts. Yea!!
As far as the workflows being "corrupt", I still don't know why, either.
It was odd that when I did Get Info for that file the Preview section actually showed (but of course, very tiny) the Automator script, so clicking (double-clicking? D-C worked this morning) it opened with no errors in Automator. Permissions are still 777 (unix), but I'll change them back to 666.
Hey! 666 removed them from Services! And when I try to open the workflow in Automator it tells me the file is corrupt. Go figure.
The answer to that might be that the /Library/Services directory already existed (because of the MacExplorer app I installed) so it held LaunchMacExplorer.workflow. The permissions on that file are drwxr-xr-x@ 3 padr staff 102 Jan 27 2013 LaunchMacExplorer.workflow .
I always wondered why write was needed for a workflow. Read or execute (unix) should be good enough.
I changed some of the files to 751 to match the MacExplorer workflow and those not only changed the coloring (ls -al) in terminal but they also now show up in Services. Yea!

How to configure notification emails for reports output or alerts for all users in r12

Hi,
I need to configure notification emails. I have provided settings in OAM-> Workflow and SMTP IP address in settings and only Outbound. I am able to test for my user ID.
I want to know how to redirect emails or alerts for users like when a user runs a report he should get notification email in his outlook about the report output and details. In settings it only points for one replyto field. How do I mention all user ID's?
Regards,
Mohammed

Hi Mohammed,
You may check on XML bursting for XML based reports.
In addition, also see links:
http://oracle.anilpassi.com/email-output-of-concurrent-program-request.html
Anil: Oracle Apps Concurrent program Output as Email
Oracle ERP World: Email the output of a concurrent program as Attachment
Also see:
How to Redirect Output from Printer to Mail Message after Running Report (Doc ID 1036586.6)
Thanks &
Best Regards,

TS20000168 workflow sent to all users

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for