TS3992 Hola

Hi
Estoy intentando hacer una copia de seguridad de mi Iphone 4 , porque voy a actualizar al iphone 5 y Itunes  me dice " que la copia de seguridad está dañada o no es valida" . Que puede ser?
He intentado hacerlo de varias maneras y es imposible.
Agradezco cualquier información.
Un saludo.
Gustavo

Cambiaste de Windows? mantienes la edición de fabrica?, los controladores mas adecuados son los ofrecidos en la we de soporte Lenovo sigue el enlace http://support.lenovo.com/es/es
Intenta por el medio cableado, para no asociar el problema solo al WIFI, para México algo que ha funcionado, en des-conexiones y lentitud es poner DNS manualmente, puedes intentar con estos:
8.8.8.8
4.4.4.4
También estos:
208.67.222.222
208.67.220.220
Un saludo.
@Antony_Vamu
Comunidad en Español  English Community  Deutsche Community  РусскоязычноеСообщество
Mis Lenovo: Y560p,Z580,Z500 touch,S920,T400,G50-70 ,Soy voluntario no trabajo para Lenovo, las opiniones expresadas por mi no representan a Lenovo, no se responde a preguntas de manera privada debes crear un nuevo tema, números del centro de llamada Lenovo Aquí , reglas de participación del foro Aquí , si encontraste solución a tu problema marcarlo aceptándolo como solucionado!!!!!

Similar Messages

  • I did made a copy of all my CC programms. for using on my other workstation. now is the CC desktop app not syncing the programme information. it do not see or sync the installed programms properly. what can i do. i do not want to download the hols set. be

    I did made a copy of all my CC programms. for using on my other workstation. now is the CC desktop app not syncing the programme information. it do not see or sync the installed programms properly. what can i do. i do not want to download the hols set. because of a slow connection

    If you are getting emails from these forums then you probably accidentally clicked on one of the links on the forums page where all the questions are listed e.g. at the top right of each forum's page there is text box with Actions and Notifications in :
    So far you've posted in the iTunes Store forum :
    https://discussions.apple.com/community/itunes/itunes_store#/
    And the Using iPad forum :
    https://discussions.apple.com/community/ipad/using_ipad#/
    If on either of those forums that box says 'stop email notifications' instead of 'receive' then click on it and it should stop that forum sending emails to you.
    There are full instructions on this page for stopping emails, as there are other places where they might have been set 'on' :  https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-3661
    This is your original post for iTunes Match : https://discussions.apple.com/message/22647293#22647293
    And this page lists your posts (you can click on each post on it to be taken to it's thread) : https://discussions.apple.com/people/suzettemg?view=overview

  • Faulty/stuck power button again! Who was the genius that located the ear-jack hole with the "Liquid Contact Indicator" at the top of the iPhone, so perspiration can accumulate and void the warranty

    My Power button is stuck again...... like many, many other owners....like two of my previous iPhones.  According to the Genius at the Genius Bar in Reno, Nv., my warranty is void because the LCI which is located in the ear-jack hole on the top, has come in contact with moisture/humidity/sweat.  My iPhone has never been dropped or wet. My iPhone4s is in pristine conditon and is in great working order except for the "stuck" power button, but because of a poor quality and location of the ear-jack hole, my warranty has been voided. Everything I have is Apple.  The Rep/Genius in Reno while fullly aware on the chronic power button problems, tried to put the stuck button on  an exposure to moisture. He said, "It doesn't matter if mositure didn't cause the button to stick or not. Your warranty voided because of the Liquid Contact Indicated turned color. Of course, the "power/sync" hole LCI is perfect.  Thank you Apple! I think I'll refuse my iPhone5 delivery on Friday and go buy a "Droid" phone.
    Hey, who out there wants to buy my new iPhone5 when it gets to me on Friday???

    Thanks for your reply. I too would not rule out moisture damaging the power button, but ...
    I guess was being too subtle. My points are:
    1. "Stuck" power buttons is a known issue/problem and Apple has been dealing with it since the first iPhone. This is quality problem. The evidence is with other users all around us and all over the web.
    2. The "sweat" issue is a design problem and should've been addressed long before the release of the iPhone5 in a few days.  Yes, they moved iPhone5's  headphone-jack to the bottom/underneath of the iPhone. To say that the "sweat" issue is the users' fault is like saying, Apple iPhones should only be sold to swine or other mammals without sweat glands. We're talking about as little as one drop from someone's temple running down the headphone-jack opening while one is engadged with a phone call.  That's all it takes to change the color of the LCI.
    3. Also I wanted to make my complaint public on this forum and not Facebook,  hoping to both, not only catch the eye of an Apple lurker, but let others know of the danger of speaking on their iPhones while out in the sun, high humidity or driving a car with the top down....... my point being, even the free AT&T Go Phones have protection against the slightest elements.
    4. I paid close to $700 for this iPhone4s 64G less than a year ago.  I don't like being dismissed with a cut and dry, cookie-cutter answer from a 20yr old without reasonable explanation and then be shoo'd out the door. "Next?"
    5. I love Apple products and I'm glad the new release has addressed the jack/perspiration problem although I know there were other factors involved in the decisions to not move/move it.

  • TS3992 Backing up to iCloud doesn't happen automatically

    Hi,
    I had a warning to say that my I-Pod hadn't been backed up to iCloud for 6 weeks. After much effort I discovered how to set up automatic backups to iCloud and, as I expected, automatic backup to iCloud has already been set up. In the settings on my iPod Touch 4th Generation, which is also on the latest ios, iCloud backup is on and, according to the description below it should automatically backup but it's not automatically backing up. I normally access the internet through home or college wireless networks all of which are stored and recognized by my iPod Touch and, I've connected my iPod to my computer several times and it hasn't backed up to iCloud. I'm assuming, given all those conditions, that every time I'm at home and in range of my home wireless networks, provided the iCloud backup option is showing as On, it should backup automatically either any time I'm in a known wireless network and/or when I connect my iPod to my computer. I've just tried to back up again now and it's coming up with the error message "The last backup could not be completed" but the iPod is connecting to the internet now (seconds after telling the backup couldn't be completed) so there's no problem with the settings and no problem with the internet connection so why's it not backing up?
    Any advice would be appreciated.

    From the TS3992 article you attached above:
    To set your iOS device to back up automatically, go to Settings > iCloud > Storage & Backup and turn on iCloud Backup. When iCloud Backup is turned on, iCloud automatically backs up your iOS device daily. This daily backup can occur only when the device meets all of these conditions:
    The device is connected to a power source.
    The device is connected to the Internet via Wi-Fi.
    The device's screen is locked.

  • 1.burned a hole in my screen can I get this repaired?  2. Even though I have it set to open up to a blank screen, no web pages, my computer (safari) continuously opens with multiple safari sites open. It doesn't seem to matter what I do, it just reverts

    1. I burned a small hole in my screen, is that fixable/replaceable? 2. Even though I have my 15" MacBook Pro set to open to empty screen when I open Safari, it constantly opens multiple previous pages. It doesn't seem to matter what I do it just reverts back to opening multiple pages. Major security risk, my bank pages have popped back up after my computer has been shut down, account numbers and all. I took my computer to an Apple store and the genious there tols me...      "honey, you can't hold your laptop on your lap, that's the problem, it's getting too hot" he honestly said that. Could someone please help me? Thanks

    Apple doesn't call its portable machines 'notebooks' instead of 'laptops' for nothing - using a MacBook Pro in your lap can cause some burns on your skin, poor ventilation, etc. So use it on a hard flat surface - not your lap, pillows, bedclothes, etc.
    As for burning a hole in your screen, you'll have to revisit the Apple Store and see how much they would charge for a new screen. It's likely to be a bit expensive.
    And if you've Safari set to re-open tabs when you restart, you can disable this feature -> Safari-Preferences-General.
    Good luck,
    Clinton

  • Okay so my i just got my new iphone 4 from sprint and sprint has the sim tray locked theres no hole on the side or anything and i was wondering if i took it to the apple store can i get it unlocked or another iphone with a open and close sim tray

    sprint shouldnt have locked the sim tray anyways and i think this is just wrong because i payed for the phone and should be able to do what i want with it. they say you can unlock the sim card or the tray i guess if you in good standings with the company an apperantly im not so i was wondering if somthing can be done about this because i see no hole or anything to even open the tray someone HELP ME ! please and thank you

    No. Nothing can be done about this. It was made clear quite some time ago what the situation was going to be.
    Now... That said, if you have an iPhone 4S, there is a SIM tray on the right hand side of the phone.
    If you have an iPhone 4 as you indicate, THERE IS NO SIM TRAY. The iPhone 4 is NOT a world Phone. You can only use that phone on Sprint or roam to their CDMA partners where present. The phone will not work at all throughout most of the world, including Europe.

  • MS Office secretly connects to my Mac and scans my activity. How??? Security hole? Exploitable by hackers?

    I have a strange problem. All by itself it's not so serious, but it concerns me that it reveals a security hole which can be exploited by hackers.
    I may be over-reacting, so any reassurance or explanation would be appreciated.
    Here's the situation:
    I have a MacBook Pro running OSX 10.6.5. I also have a new MacBook Air also running 10.6.5. I recently used Migration Assistant to move all my applications from the MacBook Pro to the MacBook Air. The migration worked fine with one very troubling exception.
    One of the applications that got migrated was MS Office 2008 (MSWord, Excel, etc.). When I just had my MacBook Pro, MS Office worked fine. Also, now, if my MacBook Pro is turned off and I'm just using my Air, MS Office again works fine.
    HOWEVER...if I have my MacBook Pro open and running MS Office on it, and then I simultaneously open my Air and try to launch MS Office, I get an error message that says
    "Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac cannot start because Microsoft Office is already in use.
    An office program is being used by Apple Mac. Your installation exceeds the number of installations permitted by the license agreement."
    However, if I then "Quit" MS Office on the Pro, and then try to launch it on the Air, I don't get the error message, and it works as normal. The same thing happens if I switch computers -- if it's running on the Air first, then I can't launch it on the Pro. Basically, only one of the computers can run MS Office at any one time.
    Now, the issue about the MS license agreement is not what concerns me -- I guess the version of MS Office I bought back in 2008 was only supposed to be installed on one single computer, and never migrated to a new computer (I eventually plan to use the Air full time and retire the Pro). I'm probably going to get a newer version of MS Office eventually anyway, and also I almost never use both computers at the same time, so I'm not worried about being unable to use MS Office on both computes simultaneously. No, what worries me is this:
    How does MS Office on one computer even know that my other computer is running and has MS Office open?
    I'm not an expert on networks and sharing and connectivity and all that, so excuse me if I use inaccurate terminology, but...:
    Both computers connect via AirPort to a cable modem and thus share the same wifi hotspot to connect to the internet.
    But as far as I can tell, the two computers are not "connected" to each other. In the System Preferences for both computers, in the "Sharing" panel, all File Sharing is off. Also, none of the sharing boxes are checked.
    Neither computer shows the hard drive of the other on its Desktop. If I wanted to, I could use Finder's "Go" menu, choose "Connect to server," then "Browse," then find the other computer, double-click on it, type in the admin password, and then connect the two computers. But I haven't done that, and MS Office is able to see what the other comoputer is doing, even when they aren't connected in any way (as far as I can tell).
    I find this pretty disturbing. How in the world does the MS Office on one computer even know that the other computer exists? Furthermore, how does it know that the other computer is on and running? And lastly and more importantly, how does it know which programs are running on the other computer?
    One extra detail: in order to try to diagnose this odd behavior, I installed a program called "Little Snitch" which monitors all network activity and notifies the user whenever any malware programs or other sneaky behind-the-scens apps try to send data over your connection without your knowledge. Little Snitch seems to work great but when I test the problem after installing it, Little Snitch did not even detect or report that MS Office was doing any surreptitious network snooping. So whatever MS Office is doing, it's doing it pretty sneakily.
    Here is my worry: Could a hacker somehow exploit this capability of MS Office to monitor activity on my computer without my being aware of it? Or could someone re-adapt this snooping code from MS Office for more nefarious purposes?
    Or am I completely misapprehending the situation somehow?
    Any  reassurance or explanation would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.

    But my question is: How does the software do that?
    It scans the local network for computers trying to "share" software that is only supposed to be licensed for one computer. I can't give you a technical answer, I can just tell you that's what it's doing.
    then what's preventing less ethical coders from deploying similar but more sinister malware with the same capability?
    Nothing. Any vendor of any software, from a one person shareware or freeware app to a company the size of Apple, Microsoft or Adobe could sneak in damaging code. Any company that wants to stay in business though would never allow it.
    In a typical software company (particularly larger ones), you have not only the people who write the code, but also system analysts who review the code looking for flaws or anything else that shouldn't be there.
    Now I have the fear that if I'm using a wifi hotspot in a cafe or wherever, someone else with hacking skills on that same hotspot could basically see what I'm doing on my computer, without my knowledge.
    The software to pry (they hope undetected) into other folks' computers on an open network like that has been around for years. That's why you at least need to have your firewall enabled when using a wifi hotspot.

  • How do I create holes through multiple layers?

    I'd like to use boxes to punch holes into the layered artwork below them. I want the result to look exactly like this image, but with the white boxes being transparent holes.
    This seems so simple, but I can't find any combination of layers/pathfinder tools/compound shapes/or clipping masks that will produce this result. No matter what, I end up losing part of the artwork (usually the topo lines and the black bar).
    What am I missing??
    Thanks in advance for any advice.

    mirvlem,
    You may:
    1) Select the boxes to become holes and Object>Group (if nort already);
    2) Select everything and in the Transparence palette flyout tick Make Opacity Mask with Clip unticked and Invert mask ticked.
    There seems to be no need for multiple layers, but the Opacity mask punches through them all right.

  • How do i set up a template for a double sided 3 hole binder book?

    I am trying to set up a template for a directory using double-sided pages in a loose leaf binder. How do I set up the margins, etc. for both sides of the page accounting for the holes to be punched. I'm at a loss in understanding how this is to be done and then printed so the pages come out in proper order. Can anyone help?

    Inspector > Document > Document Pages > check Facing Pages > Inside: 20mm or .75"
    What do you mean by proper order? If you mean printed back to back, you can print all the odd pages first then feed them back into your printer flipped and print all the even pages.
    To get them to print and come out in the right order you may have to print the evens first and perhaps printed in reverse order, experiment for your printer and take notes.
    Peter

  • Although I turned off WiFi, set as 'require admin password to turn on and off wifi, when I turn on my MacBook Pro, retina latest model, just got for a month, it turns on wifi automatically, is this a back door or virus or security hole? Thank you

    I have my all networks at 'Off' status in the system panel, never use Bluetooth either, also in the top status bar, and set as 'require admin password to turn on and off WiFi', but when I turn on my MacBookPro 15" retina newest model only one month old, it goes on to WiFi automatically by itself.
    Is this a back door? Security hole?
    The other day, I was taking a break for five minutes, when I came back, the Microsoft outlook is open for setting up an account, I never use outlook, it is there only because it comes with the office package. Also, iTunes was playing music, I don't use iTunes when I'm working. Both were not on before I left for the break.
    What is the problem?

    I have my all networks at 'Off' status in the system panel, never use Bluetooth either, also in the top status bar, and set as 'require admin password to turn on and off WiFi', but when I turn on my MacBookPro 15" retina newest model only one month old, it goes on to WiFi automatically by itself.
    Is this a back door? Security hole?
    The other day, I was taking a break for five minutes, when I came back, the Microsoft outlook is open for setting up an account, I never use outlook, it is there only because it comes with the office package. Also, iTunes was playing music, I don't use iTunes when I'm working. Both were not on before I left for the break.
    What is the problem?

  • After the 10.9.4 update, ssh no longer worked until I poked a firewall hole for sshd-keygen-wrapper

    I upgraded two of my Macs, a Mac Mini, A, and a MacBook Air, B, to OS X 10.9.4, using Software Update. After that, I could no longer ssh from A to B, but ssh from B to A worked fine. After some poking around for differences, I then noticed that in Mac B, I had made an exception for /usr/libexec/sshd-keygen-wrapper in System Preferences: Security & Privacy: Firewall: Firewall Options. When I deleted and re-added that, ssh from A to B worked again.
    But on A, I have no such "hole" in the firewall, yet ssh from B to A works fine. What is going on?
    I no longer recall whether I had myself initially added that sshd-keygen-wrapper setting on B... and why exactly I had got the (perhaps incorrect) idea that it is needed. (But if it is, why would one have to add it manually, and wht does ssh from B to A work fine without it?)

    Let me add that Mac A is the machine I am physically logged in on, and I did the check sshing from B to A in a Remote Desktop session, so the situation is not entirely symmetrical.

  • A few days ago i small piece of plastic got stuck and subsequently fell out the charger hole of my ipod classic, although it still connects to itunes and syncs itunes says it has synced but there is nothing on my ipod! Nothing seems to work! HELP! :/

    A few days ago i small piece of plastic got stuck and subsequently fell out the charger hole of my ipod classic, although it still connects to itunes and syncs itunes says it has synced but there is nothing on my ipod! I have done this a few times and nothing seems to work! HELP! :/

    Transfer all of your content to the computer:
    Tunes Store: Transferring purchases from your iPhone, iPad, or iPod to a computer
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1848
    Then try turning the device off and on again. I'd leave it off for 10-15 minutes, but that is up to you:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1430
    If the item is still there, you may need to restore the device:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1414
    Hope that helps . Worst case scenario, you may need to write into iTunes support to see if they can also help!!

  • Hola, ojalá alguien me pueda ayudar. Tengo Windows Vista Home y quise descargar el iTunes 10.5 y no termina de descargarlo porque dice que ocurrió un error de instalación: "Error Windows 2", "Apple Device Suport" no ha sido instalado correctamente. Gracia

    Hola, por favor ayúdenme a solucionar mi problema porque conecto mi iPod y no lo detecta desde que quise instalar la nueva versión de iTunes 10.5

    Let's try a standalone Apple Application Support install. It still might not install, but fingers crossed any error messages will give us a better idea of the underlying cause of the issue.
    Download and save a copy of the iTunesSetup.exe (or iTunes64setup.exe) installer file to your hard drive:
    http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
    Download and install the free trial version of WinRAR:
    http://www.rarlab.com/
    Right-click the iTunesSetup.exe (or iTunes64Setup.exe), and select "Extract to iTunesSetup" (or "Extract to iTunes64Setup"). WinRAR will expand the contents of the file into a folder called "iTunesSetup" (or "iTunes64Setup").
    Go into the folder and doubleclick the AppleApplicationSupport.msi to do a standalone AAS install.
    Does it install properly for you? If so, does iTunes launch properly now?
    If instead you get an error message during the install, let us know what it says. (Precise text, please.)

  • TS2634 I bought a ipad back in December and the ear buds never worked.  The sound doesnt come out of what you put in your ear but comes out of the little hole on the outside of the ear buds.  Is this supposed to be this way?

    The earbuds that came with my ipad have never worked.  They have sound that comes out of the outside hole of the earbuds.  When you put them in your ears no sound can be heard.  Has this been a problem or did mine just come broken?

    I have the same problem and it has just started in the last day or so...
    Got the phone late July and then in the last day, everytime I plug into PC or take a photo,  I get the same "Disk Error / Retry message"
    What is interesting is that I always had the Photo Storage location as the Memory Card (detachable).   Seems odd that sometime in the last month or so the phone decided to change my setting to the Mass Memory. Might have been an firmware update that I have done in the past but not sure.
    Changing the Photo Storage Location back to the Memory Card has stopped the error coming up everytime a Photo wastaken, but the message continues when I plug in the phone to the PC.
    Phone was just updated to latest firmware this morning and that has not helped, although during the back-up process I could not save some files from the Mass Memory.
    I wonder if Optus will shout a new phone because their technicians are useless with past experiences and to be honest the N97 really promises so much but offers very little compared to all of my last Nokia's.

  • PMTU-D Black Hole Detection Missing?  Cause of some conn hangs.

    In looking through the kernel source, it appears that Apple has left out one of the most important parts of Path MTU Discovery (RFC1191) as suggested in RFC2923. Since Path MTU Discovery is enabled by default, this may cause some of you to have 15 minute hangs and ultimate termination of connections when large packets are sent to specific hosts.
    Other than DNS and Wireless network drops, MTU settings appear to be one of the single most problematic things going on with OS X right now.
    For those who are not familiar with MTU, here's a brief rundown.
    10/100 Ethernet networks support a base MTU of around 1514 bytes. This is the max number of bytes that a packet is able to be in order to get put on an Ethernet network (and be within spec). Gigabit Ethernet allows for larger, but we won't go into that.
    You're probably more used to hearing 1500, however, that is the MTU for IP (or the Ethernet payload) as the Ethernet header itself is 14 bytes.
    In that 1500 bytes, you have to fit your IP header, ICMP/TCP/UDP header, and any higher layer protocols and data, each layering on top of the next.
    |<--Ethernet (14 Bytes)--><--IP (20 Bytes)--><--TCP (20 Bytes)--><--Data (1460 Bytes)-->|
    So that is how things look on a local area network.
    Once the WAN comes into play, the Ethernet header is stripped off leaving only the IP packet and another header put in its place to get it over the next link. This process goes on and on and on until the packet finally reaches its destination.
    But here's the problem - what if there is ANOTHER layer between the Ethernet and IP stack?
    This is actually quite common and you're probably using it now. The protocol PPP over Ethernet (PPPoE) fits between the Ethernet header and the IP header and adds another 8 bytes to this packet size.
    So now we end up with:
    |<--Ethernet (14 Bytes)--><--PPPoE (8 Bytes)--><--IP (20 Bytes)--><--TCP (20 Bytes)--><--Data (1452 Bytes)-->|
    Notice that we now can't put as much data in this packet or we'll end up with a packet that is too big to fit on the Ethernet network.
    The PPPoE header will ultimately get taken off once the packet gets where it needs to go at your ISP, but there may be other 'tunnels' between you and your ultimate destination and continue to strip off space of how much data you can put into a packet.
    So how do you know how much data you can put into a packet when you don't own or know anything about the network between you and the destination?
    That's where Path MTU Discovery comes into play.
    It used to be that IP packets would be fragmented (split up) if a packet was too big to get put on the next network. This process of fragmentation causes overhead for both the router having to split up the packets and the receiving device that has to put them all back together again (and make sure they go in the right order).
    So in order to reduce this overhead and also ensure that you are always sending the largest packets possible from end to end, IP stacks started setting the 'Don't Fragment' bit in the IP header. This instructs routers to throw away the packet if it is too big when it gets there.
    When the packet gets thrown away due to it being too large, the router that throws it away also sends an ICMP packet (an IP diagnostics message) back to the sender telling it what the MTU is of the interface that couldn't take the packet. The sender can then re-calculate things based on that value and resend.
    This works great EXCEPT when there are firewalls in the way (or broken routers, which is less likely these days). Many firewalls will not allow these ICMP messages to go back to the sender. Therefore, your host never receives the message that it is supposed to reduce the size of the packet and keeps trying and trying for about 15 minutes until it finally dies.
    This is one reason why you may be seeing long hangs that ultimately end in termination of your connection.
    RFC2923 goes into some options to work past this issue.
    One way that this can be done, Windows Vista for instance does this, is for the system to keep an eye on how many max sized packets get retransmitted. After a certain number (lets say 5), the system assumes that it is not getting this ICMP notification and cuts the size of that packet in half so it can now get the data through - assuming that smaller packets are better than no packets getting sent.
    It may also (and does with Vista) temporarily disable the setting of the 'Don't Fragment' bit and allow the routers to just take care of things. So in Vista, you'll see the page stutter for a second, and then continue to load, where an OS X system will sit there and hang for 15 minutes.
    This is where OS X goes wrong. This behavior is called PMTU-D Black Hole Detection and does not appear to be in the IP stack for Leopard (and probably not previous releases).
    So what can you do.
    You have a few options, some of which I've already provided to a few folks (although without the mathematics so it's just a rough guess value).
    First, you can just disable PMTU-D. The command to do this is:
    sudo sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.pathmtudiscovery=0
    This is a 'quick fix' but does eliminate the benefits that PMTU-D provides.
    Second, you can calculate out what size MTU seems to work for you by working backwards and configure that on something within your control.
    If your home router supports it, that's a good place to reduce the MTU since it only comes into play when you're using your Internet connection and not when hosts within the same network talk to each other. So if you place the MTU of 1472 on your router and your host sends it a 1500 byte packet, it will send back the ICMP message telling you to reduce it down to 1472.
    If your router doesn't support it, you can reduce the MTU on your macs physical interface. This isn't always the best solution since you really should then reduce the MTU on each of your local systems or you could run into issues locally.
    The command to do this is:
    sudo ifconfig en1 mtu 1472
    To make this permanent for Ethernet, set it in the Network settings. For Airport, search the forums. I provided an update you can make to one of the preferences files manually to do this (don't remember what file right now).
    I have found a couple of sites (Washington Mutual's website for instance) that appear to have configuration issues internal to their network in which a device behind a firewall (possibly the web server, load balancer, or IPSec added) that may have an MTU less than 1500 set on it AND a firewall blocking ICMP packets from coming back. These sites will throw off your math since you can no longer assume a max size of 1500 for IP packets. In this specific case, you have to assume 1480.
    Third, you can adjust the MSS setting (Max Segment Size) in the kernel to a value that is 20 bytes smaller than what you would otherwise set the MTU to. This ensures that the TCP stack doesn't put more than that amount of data in any single packet (therefore, eliminating the MTU issue), however, this will not work for UDP.
    Finally, you can submit a bug report to let Apple know that PMTU-D Black Hole detection is something that we need.
    So what kind of impact does this have on performance?
    This will depend on what solution you choose, what the performance of your home router is, and the load on the various servers that have to potentially re-assemble the packets.
    That said, knocking things all the way down to 1400 bytes, I am able to still get at least 15 Mbps up and down stream over the Internet.
    If you have any questions on this post, please post and i'll do my best to respond. Hopefully this will help one more person resolve their performance issues with Leopard.

    Hi Karsten and thanks for the suggestion!
    I have exempted internal networks and can connect them via the VPN connection. I also got connectivity to the outside world with nat (outside,outside) and 'same-security-traffic permit intra-interface'.
    A question remains though. At the moment, all traffic gets out of the network through the 'outside' interface IP (.22). I'd rather use a dedicated address from the /29 on GigabitEthernet0/0. Is this possible to achieve that? To put it differently, I'd like to NAT the VPN range onto an address that is not the 'outside' interface, like I did in this statement, for instance:
    nat (v200,outside) source dynamic v200_private v200_public
    My other question is, whether the single NAT statement [nat (outside,outside) dynamic interface] is sufficient for VPN traffic and whether the original statement can be removed [nat (vpn,outside) source dynamic vpn_pool vpn_public].
    Thanks once again for the tips!
    R.

Maybe you are looking for