Two BPC system one source

Hi.. just a quick question from yours experiences..
Is it possible to have 2 BPC system Dev & Prod, to connect into 1 ECC client & 1 BI client
seem when the BPC Dev to ECC / BI connected, the BPC prod in RSA1 become defunct..
Please advise

Hi,
You can post your queries on following forums:-
SAP Planning and Consolidation, version for SAP NetWeaver
SAP Planning and Consolidation, version for the Microsoft platform

Similar Messages

  • Two BW systems - one partition/server. How do you divide the resources?

    Hi.
    We installed a BW DEV system onto a partition of an IBM p570. Roughly 22 GB RAM allocated and plenty disk. Everything was running smoothely until we decided to install a BW QA system on the same partition. Ever since then, the DEV system has become very unstable and hangs and then crashes on a frequent basis. On inspecting the trace/log files, we can see obvious messages about the system running out of SWAP space and then halting sessions/processes. My understanding of the situation is that, when DEV was installed, it obviously "believed" that the 22 GB of memory was exclusively available to it and, now that QA is trying to run and grab resource, the DEV is somehow complaining that it doesn't have the resource that it believes it SHOULD have (in layman's terms).
    My question is, in order to get BOTH the systems running optimally (i.e. DEV and QA), what parameters do I need to change/force in order for each of the systems to believe that it now only has 11 GB of memory available? I can only think of checking memory-related parms in the config tool (heap memory, etc.), the PHYS_MEM_SIZE and j2ee/phy_mem_size in the instance profile and then one or two Oracle specific parameters around DB_CACHE_SIZE and SHARED_POOL_SIZE. There are, however, lots of other parameters, e.g. em* parameters, that I can see in the active list (TU02) that appear to be memory related, but I don't know if it is necessary to change these values, or whether they are dynamic.
    The two BW systems are ABAP/JAVA combinations (NW2004s) on AIX 5.3 / Oracle 10.2.0.2.
    Thanks in advance!
    Des.

    read SAP note 88416.
    I would leave 1GB for OS and provide 21GB for each instance (including Oracle instances)
    so basicalyl, size each instance as if you would have about 10GB only available.

  • Css is it possible to use two VIPs with one source group?

    I have separate VIPs defined for balancing dns and radius. Both services are being balanced behind the CSS between two servers running both services. Is there a way, using source groups, to have the outbound dns udp lookups go out the associated dns VIP and a client's returning radius udp traffic sourced from the associated radius VIP?
    Just a note for clarity: both services defined for dns and radius have the same ip addresses. I can only define one of the services(i.e. dns) in a single source group which automatically associates the other service (i.e. radius) to that group.

    If I understand your question correctly, you want to have the same real server respond with a different source address based on with VIP was used to get to it.
    You can only put on instance of the server's ip address into a source group. That is you can't add the service name used for one rule into one group, and the service used in the other rule into another group, since the CSS only looks at the source address when it is determining to use the source group based on the service named in it. In order to have the same server use two different source groups, you would need ACL clause with the sourcegroup option, like
    permit any 10.0.0.1 eq 53 dest any sourcegroup
    permit any 10.0.0.1 dest any sourcegroup
    Michael

  • Two hard drives, two operating systems, one MacBook Pro

    Dear community,
         I have a MacBook Pro (mid-2010) with Mac OS Lion. I plan on having this computer all through the rest of college (another two and a half years, hopefully) so I want to upgrade it just a bit. What I would like to do is take out my optical drive, install a second hard drive mount, and put an SSD in that spot. Now, this would be pretty simple if it were just Mac OS Lion that I wanted on it, but here's the catch - I'd like to put my copy of Windows 7 on that drive as well. I currently use one hard drive for Mac/Windows 7 using boot camp, so I figured it'd be possible to do this with 2 hard drives.
         Basically I'd like to put the OSes and a few programs on the SSD, and the files/remaining programs on my big HDD. Is this even possible? Any suggestions?
         In summary: Mac OS Lion and Windows 7 + a few Mac/Windows apps on the SSD; Mac OS and Windows data files and programs on the HDD. Can it be done?
    Thanks a lot.
    -Grant
    *Note- here is the hard drive caddy I'm looking at: http://www.amazon.com/Drive-Unibody-MacBook-SuperDrive-Replacement/dp/B0058AH2US /ref=wl_it_dp_o_npd?ie=UTF8&coliid=I1MJCRJMNCU4QQ&colid=1LV4HAU48M27X

    grantmcconnaughey wrote:
    Dear community,
         I have a MacBook Pro (mid-2010) with Mac OS Lion. I plan on having this computer all through the rest of college (another two and a half years, hopefully) so I want to upgrade it just a bit. What I would like to do is take out my optical drive, install a second hard drive mount, and put an SSD in that spot. Now, this would be pretty simple if it were just Mac OS Lion that I wanted on it, but here's the catch - I'd like to put my copy of Windows 7 on that drive as well. I currently use one hard drive for Mac/Windows 7 using boot camp, so I figured it'd be possible to do this with 2 hard drives.
         Basically I'd like to put the OSes and a few programs on the SSD, and the files/remaining programs on my big HDD. Is this even possible? Any suggestions?
    The SSD should be the boot drive in the present hard drive spot for these reasons.
    1: You want the SSD as the boot volume for speed of OS X, Windows and applications (must be on boot drive along with one bare bones user, each OS)
    2: You want to inflict as little change to the SSD as possible to make it last longer as they can wear out with a lot of use, thus a boot/app drive is ideal for this.
    3: Present hard drive becomes the exFAT formatted drive to use for Windows or Mac file storage use in the optical bay caddy.
    Problems:
    You can't install Windows from a external optical drive, only the internal one.
    You also won't be able to boot off a 10.6 install disk just the same.
    However you can option boot off 10.6/10.7 previously installed, or cloned (Carbon Copy Cloner), on a external drive.
    Windows in Bootcamp is subject to the same problems requiring reinstall like it is on PC's, which to reinstall would require you to install your internal optical drive each time.
    You can't make a bootable clone of Windows on a external drive and use it (because of validation issues with the drive Windows is installed on) or use it to restore Bootcamp (there used to be software that did this for Snow Leopard, but it hasn't been updated anymore)
    Also if your 2010 MBP doesn't have SATA 6, your going to be using SATA 3 and not the full speed capability of the SSD.
    What you might consider doing instead is getting a 1TB 7,200 RPM boot drive, you get storage size to partition and decent speed, without excessive speed which you might not be able to use it all with your hardware.
    Another option, if your using Windows for non-hardware presisng issues (3D games, heavy CPU loads) is to use virtual machine software (VMFusion, Parrallels Desktop etc) and run Windows in a window on OS X.  This gives the advantage of Windows running as a file, and you can have earlier "snapshots" in case Windows gets hosed like it does sometimes.
    Also Bootcamp restricts you to Windows 7, with virtual machine software you can run any Windows version, even cool Linux distros too (install older versions first then upgrade) Plus you don't have to dual boot or worry about file formatting issues, which both is a pain in the butt.
    Lion is a pain to reinstall on a new hard drive directly with older hardware (two steps involved), luckily you've got a older machine and can install 10.6.8 first, then upgrade by holding option key and clicking on Purchases, then apps, then files, then bootcamp or virtual machine software, then Windows.
    Should make a copy of that 10.6 disk
    http://www.walterjessen.com/make-a-bootable-backup-snow-leopard-install-disc/
    So anyway, that's a loadful to think about.
    What you should do is join the MacOwnersSupportGroup and ask Bmer how best to go about installing the optical drive kit. I've send all these sort of hardware hacks his way as he has done it himself so he knows.
    Apple obviously doesn't support such a thing and nearly none here can offer any support in such a thing.
    OtherWorld Computing has a kit as well, gives a enclosure for the Superdrive to use as a external optical drive as well. (just can't boot or install Windows with it.)
    As always this is all I know and subjective to change, so ask around further and perhaps you'll find more answers, but likely not here.
    See this for fast SSD choices
    http://www.harddrivebenchmark.net/high_end_drives.html
    Good Luck and hope that helps.

  • Two operating systems, one library

    I'm using iTunes 7.0.2.16 on Windows XP Pro with no problems. I just installed a dual-boot of Windows Vista RC2 for fun, and installed iTunes within Vista as well (in a separate "Program Files" folder, of course) but I can't access the XP iTunes library from the Vista installation of iTunes. I've tried the Shift-key library selection process while starting iTunes, and the library file opens, but there's nothing in it.
    After trying this initially in Vista, I went back and confirmed that I can still access the library just fine in XP. The XP library files are not (yet) being overwritten from Vista.
    The XP iTunes settings point to D:\Music for its library which consequently means the library files are in D:\Music\iTunes. I've set the Vista iTunes to the same path (D:\Music), and told it to open the "iTunes Library.itl" file manually, but as before I see a blank library.
    I don't want to export/import the library from XP to Vista as I want to keep everything in its original XP location - ideally I'd like to be able to access the same library from either OS no matter which one I've booted into.
    Any help would be appreciated! Thanks!
      Windows XP Pro  

    This is difficult to do because one, iTunes isn't capable with Vista yet, even if you enable the "Xp Compatibility mode" (it will only work some of the time!), two, your having two different OS's and iTunes editing one file and so even if you get it to work there might be some corruption.
    First, I would change the iTunes Folder in settings (on both XP and Vista) to the folder (normally "iTunes Music")(my settings point to "C:\Documents and Settings\mjd\My Documents\My Music\iTunes\iTunes Music") with all of the artist's folders in it. iTunes will automatically recognize the iTunes library files and attempt to import them.
    If that doesn't work I would try copying your initial (XP) iTunes folder to a new place and then trying iTunes within Vista. If the files show up then you know that it isn't a compatibility problem.
    Then, if it works, delete that copied folder, THEN delete all of the songs in iTunes (on Vista) and then point iTunes to the old folder and then see if it works.
    If the copied folder still shows up as blank then try uninstalling iTunes in Vista and then reinstalling it. IF that doesn't fix the problem, then you will have to wait till Apple makes a Vista compatible iTunes.

  • Two BW Systems to One OLTP Systems.

    Hello experts:
        We are in the process of connecting two BW systems one OLTP system. Currently the BW system is connected to one OLTP system.
    I have many blogs here about this issue. But I am unable to see any answers on how to set this up.  Table RSBASIDOC table(in the OLTP system) has only one entry. How can add another entry in this table to point to two BW Systems.
    As alwasy points will be rewarded.
    Regards,
    N.S

    Why it is better to filter in the BW system rather than in R/3 ?
    I would like to avoid any changes in BW, because of:
    - reducing data traffic
    - in the source system we have more data(fields), that can be used as filter in EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001
    The data sources are unfortunately the same for the both BW systems, so I cannot differ between them.
    What do you think about these solutions:
    1. Modification in the source system - to pass logical system of BW into EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (the logical system is available just before EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 is called, but unfortunately is not passed as parameter)
    2. Pass some dummy selection parameter from BW just to identify BW system ...
    May be any other solutions ?

  • Interfacing two SAP systems for data collection

    hi,
    A scenario. i have two sap systems, one is 4.7 and another is ECC. based on one value in 4.7 i want to collect data from ecc. this has to happen thru XI. so shud i write a function module in ecc which takes as parameter the input value and picks data from database and exports the same and enable this function module as RFC ?
    so then from XI this function module can be called with the required input parameter ? can anyone give me the code/steps or how to do this ?
    thks

    Hello,
    why do you want to use XI? I would create a RFC-enabled FM in the ECC system and a RFC destination (transaction SM59) in the 4.7 system (calling the ECC system). Then create a report in the 4.7 system, getting the value and calling the RFC in the ECC system via:
    CALL FUNCTION <RFC function> DESTINATION <RFC-destination>
    Best regards
    Stephan

  • Connecting two BW systems to the one R/3 source system

    Hi all!
    I have to connect two BW Systems to one R3 system. In our last tests we have had problems trying to connect two BW  servers simultaneously with R/3 source system because it allows only a logical system name for each R/3 client, and (We guess that we need to define tow diferent logical system name, one for each connection). This has been generating errors when we try to load data from R/3 to BW because, we guess, R/3 does not recognize the BW source system in the ALE connection for someone BW systems at transfer data. In this moment I have one connection active (BW1-R3). The BW2-R3 connection is already inactive. Does anybody know how perform this? we need solve the transfers problem as soon as possible.
    Thanks!  Judi

    Ah...
    please don't post twice the same question...in these forums we are always the same !!!
    You can close this thread to avoid to look in two different posts...
    Bye,
    Roberto

  • Connect two BW systems to one source system

    Hi Experts!
    I would like to know if I can set up two BW systems connect to one source system.  We copied and built new BW system (BW2) from existing BW system (BW1).  We need to have both system connect to one source system.  When I execut Restore from BW2 - RSA1 - Source System, I'm getting a following prompt:
    "Connection cannot be used. The connection BB is used in the DEV400 source system as a connection BW1400 to BW. Do you want to delete this connection in source system".
    If I select "Delete" then it replace exising connection between BW1 - DEV and creates new connection BW2 - DEV.  If I go back to BW1 and do restore then same thing happens as BW2 connection removed.
    Is there anyway we can set up two BW systems connection to one source system with restore?  Connection works fine since each one can connection with no issues.  Just when I do restore, it removes other connection.
    Thanks.

    Check if it helps:
    Loading two different SAP BW system from one SAP R/3

  • Two BW systems Can use one source sytem?

    Hi Experts,
    We are planning to share one source sytem and its all master and LO data sources to share for Two BW systems, is it possible to share like this, we want only the full loads even for LO data sources can we load to BW sytems, sharing like this, Please clarify
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    Deinately it is possible.For more information , refer:
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=1527332&messageID=3118492
    With rgds,
    Anil Kumar Sharma .P

  • How do i create one source file that feeds two users on the same pro book?

    how do i create one source file/folder of photos that feeds two users on the same pro book?

    Well you can do exactly the same with a folder of photos, just put in the Users/Shared folder.
    Iphoto is a mite more complex than this. It's a database and so there's a bit more involved.
    For iPhoto 09 (version 8.0.2) and later:
    What you mean by 'share'.
    If you want the other user to be able to see the pics, but not add to, change or alter your library, then enable Sharing in your iPhoto (Preferences -> Sharing), leave iPhoto running and use Fast User Switching to open the other account. In that account, enable 'Look For Shared Libraries'. Your Library will appear in the other source pane.
    Any user can drag a pic from the Shared Library to their own in the iPhoto Window.
    Remember iPhoto must be running in both accounts for this to work.
    If you want the other user to have the same access to the library as you: to be able to add, edit, organise, keyword etc.
    Quit iPhoto in both accounts. Move the Library to the Users / Shared Folder
    (You can also use an external HD set to ignore permissions, a Disk Image or even partition your Hard Disk.)
    In each account in turn: Double click on the Library to open it. (You may be asked to repair the Library Permissions.) From that point on, this will be the default library location. Both accounts will have full access to the library, in fact, both accounts will 'own' it.
    However, there is a catch with this system and it is a significant one. iPhoto is not a multi-user app., it does not have the code to negotiate two users simultaneously writing to the database, and trying will cause db corruption. So only one user at a time, and back up, back up back up.

  • Copy Transferrules from one source system to another

    Hi everybody,
    we're uploading data from nearly 25 sourcesystems (including separate systems and systems with more than one client to extract from) via flat-file. The source-system exports data to a shared file directory and the bw-system reads it from there. Though this results in only <b>one</b> transferrule for all source-systems, it keeps generating problems every time upload is due.
    Somebody had the idea to switch to 'standard' R/3->BW method of data staging, using generic extractors and so on. But this will result in <b>25</b> transferrules which, I'm afraid, have to be set up and maintained seperately. As there's quite some coding in the rules (the transfertructure in fact has 241 fields), flaws are for sure!
    We know the trick of exporting a transferrule, changing the source-system-mapping and re-importing the same transport-request. That can be used to copy to one or two other systems, but not for 25.
    Does anybody know another way to copy a transferrule from one source system to multiple other source systems?
    Looking forward to your answers
    Thanks and Regards
    Robert

    Hi Ralph,
    I don't like that methode. Importing the same transport 15 times, each time changing the source-system mapping and making sure, that source-system gets the changes seems to be a huge source of errors, which will be hard to find.
    What do you think of the following idea to solve the issue a totally different way:
    All transfer-rules directly connected to the source-systems are stripped of all Coding, so there is a plain 1 by 1 transformation including 0logsys.
    The InfoSources attached all lead to one ODS-Object, which has the only purpose to collect the data from the source-system without any transformation. So some fields a filled by a system and other fields maybe not.
    The coding specific for source-systems is moved to transfer- / update-rules from that ODS-Object to the original ODS-Objects / Cubes and the "collecting" ODS-Object is emptied after every loading process.
    This will result in a single point of change. It will be quite a huge program (maybe in startroutine) but it's the one and only point, where changes and corrections have to be made.
    Regards
    Robert

  • One R/3 system connecting to TWO BW systems

    Hi ,
    When we connect two bw systems to one R/3 system,
    could you please exlain what is the imact to SAP and BW in terms of query performance, batch performance,Develoment ,Quality system,security,BW Support.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    kranthi

    Hi,
    Well at first thought, i wouldnt go for the Landscape that you are suggesting. Because of obvious reasons:
    1. Performance issues while loading, on reporting.
    2. Data sources might work fine for one system and not for the other, then the whole setup is hit badly.
    3. Security and management of the 2 systems, will be a big task.
    4. Jobs would take a longer time if the Batch processes are not sufficient.

  • When we connect two bw systems to one R/3 system?

    Hi ,
    When we connect two bw systems to one R/3 system,
    could you please exlain what is the imact to SAP and BW in terms of query performance, batch performance,Develoment ,Quality system,security,BW Support.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    kranthi

    you can connect multiple BW to single R3 source system.
    In the delta queue (RSA7 in source system), you have a field with the target system, so you don´t have problem if you have many target bw system, because the data selection is done by system field.
    Challenge arises when you have multiple R3 feeding to single BW system and then you have to consolidate the master data say 0material fed from different source system R3 then you can consolidate data using consolidated infoobject.
    The following components concatenate to the key of a consolidated InfoObject:
    1)source system ID (two-character source system ID; permitted values are stored NW BI table RSSOURSYSTEM)
    2)one blank character
    3)backend object type (four-character backend object type; permitted values are stored BI table RSBWBEOTYP)
    4)master data key value as stored in the source system
    Note that the key of a consolidated InfoObject solely consists of non-integrated informations from the different source systems. Integration across source systems results from a (maybee repeatedly applied) data consolidation and cleasing process which unveils duplicate master data keys.
    Hope it Helps
    Chetan
    @CP..

  • Two Different R/3 Source System IS AFS and IS Retail

    Hi Gurus,
    I am on one implementation project. System landscape is such that there are two ECC systems. One is IS AFS and other is IS Retail. BIW reporting is requried from both the business.
    My query is whether we should go for two different BIW instance or One only.
    If I use one system, what will be the impact on reporting and ETL .
    As we can replicate data source & can activate BI content ( Cubes, ODS ) only once,  How do we ensure that reporting from cube 0SD_C03 ( just example ) for IS AFS and IS Retail ? Will there be any impact on ETL ?
    I need your opinion.  Please reply soon. If some has done this kind of implementation, please share your experience.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Komik Shah

    Hi Shah,
    This is jasvir here, working on something similar so really wanted to share things with you.
    As per my understanding if you use two separate system for Retail and AFS I guess that doesn't follow the basic rule for Common Datawarehoues so i guess you need just DW, for reporting purposes.
    I am also working on something similar so we here just have one reporting system.
    Cheers
    Jas

Maybe you are looking for