Two Related APPs with different session?

Hi all!
I have two apps (in a different workspace) linked by a tab. And whenever i switch between them, apex assigns a new session id.
The url given by me to the tab includes the &SESSION.
Is there any way to maintain the session??
Thanks!!!

No, see cookies and sessions
Scott

Similar Messages

  • HT1491 I have two itunes accounts with different Apple ID's.  How can I merge them into one?

    I ahve two itunes accounts with different Apple ID's.  How can I merge them into one account?

    Apple has no provisions for this. You cannot merge multiple Apple ID's into one ID. Content is always tied to the Apple ID that was used to purchase it.

  • Why i'm unable to update App with different Apple ID? (it gives me an error: Impossible to connect to iTunes Store)

    Hello,
    i installed a lot of Apps on my iPad (both free and purchased), then a sad day  i had to change my apple ID (due to some mistakes in configuring the ipad for my wife with a different apple ID and for icloud...).
    Now i have apps with my last apple ID account and apps with my previous one.
    When i have to update Apps with my last apple ID, there's no problem, but when i try to update Apps installed with the OLD one a problem occurs and even if i type the right password for it i get always the same message: Impossible to connect to iTunes Store!
    Password for old apple ID is correct because i can log on line at account page on https://appleid.apple.com/it/
    I read everywhere that having Apps with different account on the same Ipad is allowed, so....What's the Problem?? 
    thank you in advance.
    Bye

    Content and Apple IDs -
    Content is forever tied to the Apple ID that bought it. Apple does not transfer content from one Apple ID to another. Apple does not merge Apple IDs. You will never be able to access your content bought with another Apple ID with a new Apple ID.

  • Merge of two same items with different Qty in po

    Hi Experts,
    Is it possible to merge two Same items with different Quantity into 1.
    For Eg:- 2 similar  items  with qty 2 & 3 must show 5 qty appearing once.Is it possible through Transnotification what should be the query.
    Mona

    Hi Mona,
    If you want to display a Purchase Order on screen summarized by item, set the "Summary Type"  to "By Item" (by default it is "No Summary"). The PO lines will then be summarized by item with total quantity for each item.
    If you want to display it on the printout then you need to modify the PLD. It is quite easy actually. You can use the Repetitive Area Footer to display the summary of each item and set all fields in the Repetitive Area to be not visible and set the height to minimum height.
    Cheers,
    Marini

  • Joining two fact tables with different dimensions into single logical table

    Hi Gurus,
    I try to accomplish in Oracle Business Intelligence 11.1.1.3.0:
    F1 (D1, D2 and D3)
    F2 (D1 and D2 and D4)
    And we want to build a report F1 F2 D1 D2 D3 D4 to have data for:
    F1 that match only for D1-D2-D3
    and data for
    F2 that match only D1-D2-D4
    all that in one row, so D3 and D4 are not common dimensions.
    I can only do:
    F3 (D1, D2)
    F4 (D1, D2 and D4)
    And report
    F3 F4 D1,D2,D4 (all that in one row, and only D4 is not a common dimension)
    Here is the very good example how to accomplish the scenario 1
    http://108obiee.blogspot.com/2009/08/joining-two-fact-tables-with-different.html
    But looks like it does not work in 11.1.1.3.0
    I get
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail: [,,Clients,,Day,ROI,,,,EW_Names,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]. (HY000)
    I am sure I set up everything correctly as advised in the blog but it works with only one not a common dimension
    Is it a bug in 11.1.1.3.0 or something?
    Thanks,
    Kate

    Thanks for all your replies.
    Actually, I've tried the solutions you guys mentioned. Generally speaking, the result should be displayed. However, my scenario is a little bit tricky.
    table Y's figures are not the aggregation of table X for D dimension. Instead, table Y's figures include not only D dimension total, but also others (others do not mean A, B, C dimension). For example, table Y stores all food's figure, while table X stores only drink's figure. D dimension is only about drink's detail. In my scenario, other foods' figure is not provided.
    So, even if I set D dimension to all/total for table X, table X's result is still not the same as table Y.
    Indeed, table Y does not have a column key to join to D dimension's key. So, if I select D dimension and table Y's measures at the same time in BI Answer, result returns no data. Hence, I can't compare table X and table Y's results with selection of D dimension.
    Is there any solution to solve this problem?
    Edited by: TomChan on Jun 3, 2009 9:36 AM

  • Performance between two partitionned tables with different structure

    Hi,
    I would like if there is a difference between two partitionned tables with different structure in term of performance (access, query, insertions, updates ).
    I explain myself in detail :
    I have a table that stores one value every 10 minutes in a day (so we have 144 values (24*6) in the whole day), with the corresponding id.
    Here is the structure :
    | Table T1 |
    + id PK |
    + date PK |
    + sample1 |
    + sample2 |
    + ... |
    + sample144 |
    The table is partionned on the column date, with a partionned every months. The primary key is based on the columns (id, date).
    There is an additionnal index on the column (id) (is it useful ?).
    I would like to know if it is better to have a table with just (id, date, value) , so for one row in the first table we'll have 144 rows in the future? table. The partition will already be on the columns (id, date) with the index associated.
    What are the gains or loss in performance with this new structure ( access, DMLs , storage ) ?
    I discuss with the Java developers and they say it is simpler to manage in their code.
    Oracle version : Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
    Thanks & Regards
    From France
    Oliver
    Edited by: 998239 on 5 avr. 2013 01:59

    I mean storage in tablespaces and datafiles on disk.
    Can you justify please and give me concrete arguments why the two structures are equivalent ( except inserting data in T(id, date,value))
    because i have to make a report.i didnt say any thing like
    two structures are equivalent ( except inserting data in T(id, date,value)i said
    About structure : TABLE1(id, date, value) is better than TABLE1(id, date, sample1, .... sample144)because
    1) oracle has restriction for numbers of column. Ok you can have 144 columns now but for future if you must have more than 1000 columns , what will you do?
    2) Restrictions on Table Compression (Table compression is not supported for tables with more than 255 columns.)
    3) store same type values on diffrent columns is bad practise
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28318/schema.htm#i4383
    i remember i seen Toms article about this but now i cant find it sorry ((( if i found i will post here

  • How to do consolidation using two chart accounts with different currencies

    Hi
    How to do consolidation using two chart accounts with different currencies and do we need to use same fiscal year variant ?
    What would be the impossible factors when we use two company codes with two chart of accounts ...
    Regards
    Kesharika

    Good Afternoon
    You need to use translationa and/or valuation
    translation takes account in foreign currency and translates to group currency
    valuation takes account in currency 1 and restates into currency 2 for a company with currency 2
    so depends on which company you are consolidating for, a company in a foreign currency in that currency or consolidating a compnay in foreign currency to parent company in another currency

  • How can i compare two excel files with different no. of records.

    Hi
    I am on to a small project that involves us to compare two excel files. i am able to do it but am struck up at a point. When i compare 2 different .csv files with different no. of lines i am only able to compare upto a point till when the number of lines is same in both the files.
    Eg. if source file has 8 lines and target file has 12 lines. The difference is displayed only till 8 lines and the remaining 4 lines in source lines are not shown.
    Can you help me in displaying those extra 4 lines in source file. I am attaching my code snippet below..
    while (((strLine = br.readLine()) != null) && ((strLine1 = br1.readLine())) != null)
                     String delims = "[;,\t,,,|]";
                    String[] tokens = strLine.split(delims);
                    String[] tokens1 = strLine1.split(delims);
                   if (tokens.length > tokens1.length)
                    for (int i = 0; i < tokens.length; i++) {
                        try {
                            if (!tokens.equals(tokens1[i])) {
    System.out.println(tokens[i] + "<----->" + tokens1[i]);
    out.write(sno + " \t" + lineNo1 + " \t\t" + tokens[i] + "\t\t\t\t" + tokens1[i]);
    out.println();
    sno++;
    } catch (Exception exception)
    out.write(sno + " \t" + lineNo1 + " \t\t" + tokens[i] + "\t\t\t\t" + "");
    out.println();
    Thanks & Regards                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

    A CSV file is not an Excel file.
    But apart from that your logic makes no sense.
    If the 2 files are of different sizes the files are different by definition, so further comparison isn't needed, you're done.
    If you want to compare individual records, you need to compare all records from one file with all records from the other, unless the order of records is important in which case your current system might work.
    That system however is overly complicated for comparing CSV files.
    As you assume a single record per line, and if one can assume those records to have identical layout (so no leading or trailing whitespace in or between columns in one file that's not in the other) comparing records is simply a matter of comparing the entire lines.

  • Two Fact tables with Different set of Dimension Tables

    Here is my scenario:
    I got two fact tables: X and Y (actually, they are the same tables, but with different level of data)
    and four dimension tables: A, B, C, D
    X joins relationship to all dimensions (A, B, C, D).
    Y joins relationship to only A, B, C, but no D.
    When I select dimension A, B and C together with fact tables X and Y in BI Answer, result is displayed and compared.
    However, if I select dimension D together with fact tables X and Y, only data from fact table X is displayed. There is no result displayed for fact table Y. I know that this is because fact table Y does not join to dimension D.
    If the above relationship unchanged, how can I display both X and Y's result in BI Answer when dimension D is selected?

    Thanks for all your replies.
    Actually, I've tried the solutions you guys mentioned. Generally speaking, the result should be displayed. However, my scenario is a little bit tricky.
    table Y's figures are not the aggregation of table X for D dimension. Instead, table Y's figures include not only D dimension total, but also others (others do not mean A, B, C dimension). For example, table Y stores all food's figure, while table X stores only drink's figure. D dimension is only about drink's detail. In my scenario, other foods' figure is not provided.
    So, even if I set D dimension to all/total for table X, table X's result is still not the same as table Y.
    Indeed, table Y does not have a column key to join to D dimension's key. So, if I select D dimension and table Y's measures at the same time in BI Answer, result returns no data. Hence, I can't compare table X and table Y's results with selection of D dimension.
    Is there any solution to solve this problem?
    Edited by: TomChan on Jun 3, 2009 9:36 AM

  • Why connect two dhcp servers with different IP addresses?

    
    so for an assignment at college we had to configure a router connected to two switches which both had a server connected to them.
    the computers were connected via dhcp to either server however each side had a different IP. we have now been asked to justify as to why two servers were used with different IP which I cannot quite produce a business orientated answer.
    I can understand connecting two dchp servers on same IP to increase fault tolerance but I do not understand using two separate IP addresses.

    Hi,
    Does “using two separate IP addresses“ mean 2 subnets which are connected by router？
    If you have separately configured 2 DHCP servers on the 2 subnets, and want 1 of the 2 DHCP servers to provide fault tolerance for the other. You need to use an RFC 1542–compliant router, or DHCP relay agent, in order to forward DHCP broadcast traffic.
    If there is any misunderstanding about your question, please correct. 
    Best Regards,           
    Eve Wang                                                                             
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • Unable to use two af:tables with differing coloring (skins)?

    Im trying to configure the Siebel Self-Services application and customize the skinning. I have some problems though, because i need to show two af:tables on the same page, but with different coloring. One with black background and white text (both header and body) and one with white background and black text. I have tried to use styleClass:es, but the css parameters set for the af table are overriding the ones set in the stylesheets.
    Anyone having an idea how to overcome this?
    Thanks
    /Jon-Erik

    Hi,
    if the styleClass name is table1 then the skin selector would be something like
    .table1 af|table
    or .afTable.af|table
    I don't see how this can be overriden. If you assumption is that the style class reference must be to a CSS definition on the page then this indeed does not work. The styleClass name is kind of a named identifier for the component to skin and is used to further qualify the component to skin
    Frank

  • Updating app with different creative cloud account

    This question is about an existing single folio app which is already published and is now to be updated. Unfortunately the app was uploaded into the app builder from a creative cloud we don't have access to anymore, so we would need to use our "new" creative cloud to load it into the app builder and then into itunes. is this possible or do we have to publish a new app?
    the itunes account is the same, of course.

    As long as you use the same certificates and iTunes account, you can rebuild the app with a different CC account and submit it as an update to an existing app.

  • Commit handling with Different sessions on same Database

    Hi,
    We have a requirement, where-in we have two modules working on the same database but different schemas.
    In this case, also the oracle session for both the module is also different.
    We want to ensure a two phase commit logic in this scenario, wherein the integrity of the data commit is maintained across sessions.
    How can I achieve the same, Because I have heard two phase commit works of Distributed database using DTC(Distributed transaction co-ordinator.
    Regards,
    Uravesh

    urvesh wrote:
    Hi,
    We have a requirement, where-in we have two modules working on the same database but different schemas.
    In this case, also the oracle session for both the module is also different.
    We want to ensure a two phase commit logic in this scenario, wherein the integrity of the data commit is maintained across sessions.
    How can I achieve the same, Because I have heard two phase commit works of Distributed database using DTC(Distributed transaction co-ordinator.
    Why do you think that the integrity of the data would not be preserved with the commit functionality ? What do you think two phase-commit does?
    Aman....

  • Relating facts with different grains

    I'm having an issue designing a cube/star schema where I need to relate 2 fact tables that are at a different grain.
    I currently have a star with 1 fact table (Insurance Premium) and 3 dimensions (Date, Account, Policy).  The fact table has 1 row for each policy within each account for every quarter (quarterly snapshot).  The measure is Premium.
    We need to enhance this star with a new fact table that stores Lost Accounts for each quarter.  The difference with this data is that we only get it at the Account Level.  So the Fact table will have 1 row for each lost account per quarter.  The
    measure is Lost Premium.
    I created the Lost Business Fact table which relates to the same Date and Account dimension as the Insurance Premium Fact table.  In the cube, i created a new measure group for the Lost Premium fact table and related it to the same Date and Account
    dimensions.
    the 2 issues that I am having are:
    1.  In the Policy Dimension table, there is a field called AccountBroker, which stores the Broker for the account.  So if the account has 5 policies, this table will have 5 rows and the AccountBroker field will be the same for each row.  The
    end users want to be able to use this field (AccountBroker) in the Lost Premium Fact table so that they can slice and dice the Lost Premium by Account Broker.  The issue is that I'm not sure how to relate the Lost Premium Fact to the Policy Dimension
    since the Lost Premium Fact is at Account level and the Policy Dimension is at Policy Level.
    2.  The other issue is that when we receive the Lost Business File for each quarter, the account may not be present in the Premium Fact because it was lost.  So for example, for Q1 2014, account 1234 was lost and we receive a record in the Lost
    Business File with Account 1234 as being lost and it gets inserted into the Lost Premium Fact.  However, when we get the file that loads the Insurance Premium Fact for Q1 2014, this account is not present because it was lost in that quarter, so there
    is no way to link the records.  My first thought was to maybe take the records from the previous quarter (Q4 2012) and insert those records for Q1 2014 into the Insurance Premium Fact with 0 premium so that they exist and then there will be a match, but
    not sure if there is a better design.
    any ideas would be appreciated.
    thanks
    Scott

    For me,
    DEPT_FACT is not a fact. It's a dimension table because you have a one-to-many relationship and you have a measure in the dimension table (it's an aggregated measure).
    And EMP_FACT is also not a fact because you don't have any measure on it.
    But if we say that EMP_FACT is a fact. DEPT_FACT is an aggregated table from EMP_FACT.
    I will :
    * create a logical dimension for the employee with three levels (all, departement and detail)
    * create a logical fact table with :
    - one logical column for the revenue in the level all departement
    - one logical column for the employee
    and two physical source :
    * DEPT_FACT with the departement level
    * EMP_FACT with the level to detail
    Success
    Nico

  • Need to setup Premiere CS6 sequence for two file types with different field orders

    I have a client who has shot video for me using two cameras, one camera was set to progressive, and the other to interlaced upper field first. I need to use both file types in the edit and have been struggling to set up the sequence to get the best look for the end product, a DVD. I have several videos to do for her that were all shot in the same way, so I need a solution!
    I would appreciate help figuring out how to set up this work flow from beginning to end.
    Should I convert one of the files from the beginning so they match field orders before going into a sequence? Or do I just need to do some adjusting of the files once they are in the sequence? Is it just as simple as changing the transcode settings to favor the upper field first? I'm definitely having issues once the video is transcoded in Encore and you can see a lot of jagged edges and lines especially during movement. My client isn't happy and I've tried several workarounds, but to no avail.
    Here are the two file types I have:
    File extension: .MOV
    H.264, 1920x1080, Linear PCM, 16 bit little-endian signed integer, 48000 Hz, stereo
    FPS 29.97
    No Fields: Progressive Scan
    File extension: .MTS (my Mac finder can't read these files, but they are read in Premiere)
    Image Size: 1920 x 1080
    Frame Rate: 29.97
    Source Audio Format: 48000 Hz - compressed - 6 channels
    Pixel Aspect Ratio: 1.0
    Upper Field First
    I am using Adobe Premiere CS 6.0.2
    Encore 6.0.1
    Media Encoder 6.0.2.81
    I am running it on an iMac 27-inch, Mid 2011
    with Mac OS X Lion 10.7.5
    Processor  3.4 GHz Intel Core i7
    Graphics  AMD Radeon HD 6970M 1024 MB
    I've just been setting the sequence to match the .MOV files since they look much better than the .MTS files. I've done the opposite as well, setting the sequence to match the .MTS files and it doesn't seem to help. I've also changed the field order of the files once they are in the sequence by changing the field options and have tried converting the .MTS files in the Media Encoder, but nothing I've done has worked.
    Any help would be so appreciated! The client I have is a photographer, so she wasn't aware of this issue when she first shot these videos. So I have 10 videos with these issues I need to get back to her, hopefully issue free! I'm struggling as an editor because my last job I was using FCP and was working with videographers who knew what they were doing, so I've never faced such problems before. Plus I'm new to the Adobe software. Not a good combination. Please forgive me if I didn't give all the information you need. I will happily respond with whatever more information you may need to help me out!
    ~KTrouper

    I wonder if you could do your edit ignoring any visual issues of the interlaced footage but keeping the different sources separate ( checkerboard edit Vid 1/ Vid 2 )
    Lock it down then export the interlaced part of the edit as a Digital Intermediate.
    Maybe Export the other source as well to the same codec. DI
    Bring them back together in a New Sequence. You wold have to deal with the black spacing.

Maybe you are looking for