UI Component (h:selectOneMenu) showing old value not matching backing bean

Mojarra 2.1.7-jbossorg-1
I'm out of my wits trying to figure out what is going on here.
I have broken down the problem that I am seeing to something smaller test case that is easily reproducable.
Two <h:selectOneRadio> ( Approved and Notified )
One <h:selectOneMenu> wrapped in a <h:panelGroup>
One <h:commandButton>
The list of contents of the <h:selectOneMenu> is dependent on the value of the "Approved" <h:selectOneRadio>, and the list is obtained from the viewBean.
Apart from the "required" attribute, the only other validation is a validator method in the bean that:
If "Approved" radio button is Yes, and "Notified" radio button is No, then a ValidatorException is thrown and is shown on the <h:messages>
Now the issue:
1) Select Approved "Yes"
2) Select Notified "No"
3) Select dropdown to PEND
4) Select Submit button
5) <h:messages> show "Notified must be true when action is PEND". All good.
6) Change Approved to "No" ... Note that there is a listener on change of Approved ... and the listener will always set the value of the dropdown to null.
Because I changed the value of the Approved radio button, the dropdown selection is then changed to the "- Select- " item, which is what I am expecting as that is what the listener method does ... and the dropdown is re-rendered.
7) Change Approved back to "Yes" ... dropdown changes back to PEND ... This is what I do not understand.
Why was it being changed back to PEND when:
A) The listener on the Approved radio button always sets the value of the dropdown to null in the backend.. and
B) The Approved render attribute always re-render the dropdown
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
      xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"
      xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
      xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets">
<h:head></h:head>
<body>
<h:form>
       <h:outputLabel value="Approved:"/>
       <h:selectOneRadio id="approved" value="#{viewBean.approved}"
            required="true"
            requiredMessage="Approved is required.">
            <f:selectItem itemValue="true" itemLabel="Yes"/>
            <f:selectItem itemValue="false" itemLabel="No"/>
            <f:ajax
                event="valueChange"
                execute="@this"
                render="nextActionPanel"
                listener="#{viewBean.triggerApprovedChange()}"/>
       </h:selectOneRadio>
       <h:outputLabel value="Notified:"/>
       <h:selectOneRadio id="notified" value="#{viewBean.notified}"
            required="true"
            requiredMessage="Notified is required."
               validator="#{viewBean.validateNotified}">
            <f:selectItem itemValue="true" itemLabel="Yes"/>
            <f:selectItem itemValue="false" itemLabel="No"/>
            <f:ajax
                event="valueChange"
                execute="@this"
                render="@none"/>
       </h:selectOneRadio>
        <h:panelGroup id="nextActionPanel">
       <h:selectOneMenu id="nextAction"
             required="true"
             requiredMessage="Next Action is required."
             value="#{viewBean.nextAction}">
             <f:selectItem itemValue="" itemLabel="- Select -" />
             <f:selectItems
                 value="#{viewBean.availableNextActions}" var="target"
                 itemValue="#{target.value}"
                 itemLabel="#{target.label}"/>
               <f:ajax
                event="valueChange"
                execute="@this"
                render="@none"/>
       </h:selectOneMenu>
        </h:panelGroup>
       <h:commandButton id="submit" value="Submit"/><br/>
       <h:messages/>
</h:form>
</body>
</html>
package test;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
import javax.faces.application.FacesMessage;
import javax.faces.bean.ManagedBean;
import javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped;
import javax.faces.component.UIComponent;
import javax.faces.context.FacesContext;
import javax.faces.validator.ValidatorException;
@ManagedBean
@ViewScoped
public class ViewBean implements Serializable {
     private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
     private Boolean approved;
     private Boolean notified;
     private String nextAction;
     private List<NextAction> availableNextActions;
     public Boolean getApproved() {
          return approved;
     public void setApproved(Boolean selection) {
          this.approved = selection;
     public Boolean getNotified() {
          return notified;
     public void setNotified(Boolean selection2) {
          this.notified = selection2;
     public String getNextAction() {
          return nextAction;
     public void setNextAction(String nextAction) {
          this.nextAction = nextAction;
     public void triggerApprovedChange() {
          changeAvailableNextActions();
          setNextAction(null);
     public List<NextAction> getAvailableNextActions() {
          return availableNextActions;
     private void setAvailableNextActions(List<NextAction> availableNextActions) {
          this.availableNextActions = availableNextActions;
     public void changeAvailableNextActions() {
          List<NextAction> nextActions = new ArrayList<NextAction>();
          if( Boolean.TRUE.equals( getApproved() )) {
               nextActions.add( new NextAction("PEND", "Pend"));
          nextActions.add( new NextAction("REQADVICE", "Request Advice"));
          nextActions.add( new NextAction("FIN", "Finish"));
          setAvailableNextActions(nextActions);
     @PostConstruct
     public void init() {
          changeAvailableNextActions();
     public void validateNotified(
          FacesContext context,
        UIComponent toValidate,
        Object value)
          throws Exception
          List<FacesMessage> messages = new ArrayList<FacesMessage>();
          Boolean isNotified = (Boolean) value;
          if( Boolean.FALSE.equals( isNotified ) && "PEND".equals( nextAction )) {
               FacesMessage message = new FacesMessage(FacesMessage.SEVERITY_ERROR,
                    "Notified must be true when action is PEND", null);
               messages.add( message );
          if( messages.size() > 0 ) {
               throw new ValidatorException(messages);
     public class NextAction implements Serializable {
          private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
          private String label;
          private String value;
          public NextAction(String aValue, String aLabel) {
               value = aValue;
               label = aLabel;
          public String getLabel() {
               return label;
          public String getValue() {
               return value;
}

gimbal2 wrote:
jmsjr wrote:
Ok .. I am confused by what you just said .. as I did say that the same problem STILL exists in Mojarra 2.1.22.
ergo .. It is not an issue with the usage of JSF but appears to be a bug in the implementation.I meant a bug in the old version that JBoss ships with. But I also mean in general; as you can see JSF 2.x is already on release 22 - the chance of you finding such an easy to trigger bug has become relatively slim. So no, I must assume it is actually a problem with not understanding how JSF ticks properly. Which is understandable since after using it for 5 years it still surprises me occasionally.
The bug you link to is about values staying the same, not reverting back to a previous state.OK .. Maybe this will be more convincing (?). I change the xhtml so that it also displays ( via h:outputText ) .. the value of the backing bean that is the same value used for the h:selectOneMenu.
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
      xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"
      xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
      xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets">
<h:head></h:head>
<h:body>
<h:form>
       <h:outputLabel value="Approved:"/>
       <h:selectOneRadio id="approved" value="#{viewBean.approved}"
            required="true"
            requiredMessage="Approved is required.">
            <f:selectItem itemValue="true" itemLabel="Yes"/>
            <f:selectItem itemValue="false" itemLabel="No"/>
            <f:ajax
                event="valueChange"
                execute="@this"
                render="nextActionPanel"
                listener="#{viewBean.triggerApprovedChange()}"/>
       </h:selectOneRadio>
       <h:outputLabel value="Notified:"/>
       <h:selectOneRadio id="notified" value="#{viewBean.notified}"
            required="true"
            requiredMessage="Notified is required."
               validator="#{viewBean.validateNotified}">
            <f:selectItem itemValue="true" itemLabel="Yes"/>
            <f:selectItem itemValue="false" itemLabel="No"/>
            <f:ajax
                event="valueChange"
                execute="@this"
                render="@none"/>
       </h:selectOneRadio>
        <h:panelGroup id="nextActionPanel">
        Backing Bean value for nextAction is '<h:outputText value="#{viewBean.nextAction}"/>'<br/>
       <h:selectOneMenu id="nextAction"
             required="true"
             requiredMessage="Next Action is required."
             value="#{viewBean.nextAction}">
             <f:selectItem itemValue="" itemLabel="- Select -" />
             <f:selectItems
                 value="#{viewBean.availableNextActions}" var="target"
                 itemValue="#{target.value}"
                 itemLabel="#{target.label}"/>
               <f:ajax
                event="valueChange"
                execute="@this"
                render="nextActionPanel"/>
       </h:selectOneMenu>
        </h:panelGroup>
       <h:commandButton id="submit" value="Submit" render="@form"/><br/>
       <h:messages/>
        <ui:debug/>
</h:form>
</h:body>
</html>All I changed was
1) Added the following:
Backing Bean value for nextAction is '<h:outputText value="#{viewBean.nextAction}"/>'<br/>.. which is in the same panel ( <h:panelGroup id="nextActionPanel"> ) as the <h:selectOneMenu>
2) Changed the render attribute of the h:selectOneMenu so that instead of @none, it is now:
               <f:ajax
                event="valueChange"
                execute="@this"
                render="nextActionPanel"/>3) Repeated the same steps as before ... and after step [6]:
3a) The h:outputText says:
Backing Bean value for nextAction is ''3b) But the h:selectOneMenu still has the PEND option selected.

Similar Messages

ERROR: Component identity found in manifest does not match the identity of the component requested.

I am getting below mentioned error?
ERROR: Component identity found in manifest does not match the identity of the component requested. Reference is Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50608.0".
Definition is Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50727.762".
ERROR: Activation Context generation failed.
End Activation Context Generation.
How to solve this error?
=================
Begin Activation Context Generation.
Input Parameter:
Flags = 0
ProcessorArchitecture = Wow32
CultureFallBacks = en-US;en
ManifestPath = C:\Program Files (x86)\Citrix\ICA Client\MFC80.DLL
AssemblyDirectory = C:\Program Files (x86)\Citrix\ICA Client\
Application Config File =
INFO: Parsing Manifest File C:\Program Files (x86)\Citrix\ICA Client\MFC80.DLL.
INFO: Manifest Definition Identity is (null).
INFO: Reference: Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50608.0"
INFO: Resolving reference Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50608.0".
INFO: Resolving reference for ProcessorArchitecture WOW64.
INFO: Resolving reference for culture Neutral.
INFO: Applying Binding Policy.
INFO: No publisher policy found.
INFO: No binding policy redirect found.
INFO: Begin assembly probing.
INFO: Did not find the assembly in WinSxS.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_32\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC\8.0.50608.0__1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.DLL.
INFO: Did not find manifest for culture Neutral.
INFO: End assembly probing.
INFO: Resolving reference for ProcessorArchitecture x86.
INFO: Resolving reference for culture Neutral.
INFO: Applying Binding Policy.
INFO: No publisher policy found.
INFO: No binding policy redirect found.
INFO: Begin assembly probing.
INFO: Did not find the assembly in WinSxS.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_32\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC\8.0.50608.0__1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.DLL.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Program Files (x86)\Citrix\ICA Client\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.DLL.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Program Files (x86)\Citrix\ICA Client\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.MANIFEST.
INFO: Manifest found at C:\Program Files (x86)\Citrix\ICA Client\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.MANIFEST.
INFO: End assembly probing.
INFO: Resolving reference Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui,language="*",processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50608.0".
INFO: Resolving reference for ProcessorArchitecture WOW64.
INFO: Resolving reference for culture en-US.
INFO: Applying Binding Policy.
INFO: No publisher policy found.
INFO: No binding policy redirect found.
INFO: Begin assembly probing.
INFO: Did not find the assembly in WinSxS.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_32\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui\8.0.50608.0_en-US_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui.DLL.
INFO: Did not find manifest for culture en-US.
INFO: End assembly probing.
INFO: Resolving reference for culture en.
INFO: Applying Binding Policy.
INFO: No publisher policy found.
INFO: No binding policy redirect found.
INFO: Begin assembly probing.
INFO: Did not find the assembly in WinSxS.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_32\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui\8.0.50608.0_en_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui.DLL.
INFO: Did not find manifest for culture en.
INFO: End assembly probing.
INFO: Resolving reference for ProcessorArchitecture x86.
INFO: Resolving reference for culture en-US.
INFO: Applying Binding Policy.
INFO: No publisher policy found.
INFO: No binding policy redirect found.
INFO: Begin assembly probing.
INFO: Did not find the assembly in WinSxS.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_32\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui\8.0.50608.0_en-US_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui.DLL.
INFO: Did not find manifest for culture en-US.
INFO: End assembly probing.
INFO: Resolving reference for culture en.
INFO: Applying Binding Policy.
INFO: No publisher policy found.
INFO: No binding policy redirect found.
INFO: Begin assembly probing.
INFO: Did not find the assembly in WinSxS.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_32\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui\8.0.50608.0_en_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui.DLL.
INFO: Did not find manifest for culture en.
INFO: End assembly probing.
INFO: Parsing Manifest File C:\Program Files (x86)\Citrix\ICA Client\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.MANIFEST.
INFO: Manifest Definition Identity is Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50727.762".
ERROR: Component identity found in manifest does not match the identity of the component requested. Reference is Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50608.0".
Definition is Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50727.762".
ERROR: Activation Context generation failed.
End Activation Context Generation.

Hello Xyzam,
Welcome to MSDN forum.
Based on your description, I am afraid that your issue is out of support range of VS General Question forum which mainly discusses
the usage of Visual Studio IDE such as WPF & SL designer, Visual Studio Guidance Automation Toolkit, Developer Documentation and Help System
and Visual Studio Editor.
Whether did this issue occur when you do something in Visual Studio? Which version of Visual Studio are you using? If you got this issue when you worked with a project, please tell us the type of your project, is it MFC project?
When you running this MFC project?
If you created new and simple project, whether you get this issue?
Please provide us detailed information, then we will provide you better support.
Best regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Passing radio button values to the backing bean

Hi all,
I need help with passing group of radio button values to a backing bean. I have page which has a dataTable to display a list of alerts. For each alert there are two radio buttons (YES & No) to indicate whether the email option for each alert is set or not. Now when i change the radio buttons and click on a submit button i should be able to pass these radio button values into action method in which i need to update the alerts. This is my code
<h:form>
<t:dataTable id="sub"
                   var = "alert"
                   value =#{subscriberBean.alertsList}">
<t:column>
<h:outputText value="#{alert.name}" />
</t:column>
<t:column>
<h:selectOneRadio id="subscriptions" value="#{alert.sendEmail}">
<f:selectItem id="item1" itemLabel="Yes" itemValue="0" />
<f:selectItem id="item2" itemLabel="No" itemValue="1" />
</h:selectOneRadio>
</t:column>
<t:dataTable>
<h:commandButton id="button1" value="Save changes" actionListener="#{subscriberBean.updateAlert}" />
</h:form>
{code}
I tried to to do something like below and get the updated list in the action event in the backing bean but it didn't work.
{code}
<h:commandButton id="button1" value="Save changes" actionListener="#{subscriberBean.updateAlert}" >
<f:attribute name="alerts" value="#{subscriberBean.alertsList}"/>
</h:commandButton>
// Backing Bean
public void updateAlert(ActionEvent e){
List<Alert updateList = (List<Alert>)event.getComponent().
                getAttributes().get("alerts");
{code}
Can someone advise how to get these update radio button values in my actionListener method.

The value the user selected will be written to the sendEmail property of the managed bean named alert. We know this because you set the value attribute to #{alert.sendEmail}. So simply access the managed bean in your action method.

Textarea shows old value

I had a very strange problem yesterday.
I have an ajax application which posts a form via ajax. after that this form gets hidden. When I opened another record, the server gave me new values and the form appears again. this works ok 99,9% of the time but suddenly i noticed the first field on the form was correct but the second on gave me the old value. Of course i thought of a server mistake first but when i opened the web inspector i saw that here the field had the correct (new) value but on screen it showed the old value. In the log i saw a doclip error reported by safari but i am not sure this is related. Any clue how this could have happened?

Insert egg on face here ...
Per the FM, I had to REFRESH the service, and then restart it.
And add MODE="-bd" to default/sendmail.
And now it works.
And now I know. And knowing ...

How to show old value in webui when user press NO button on popup button.

Hi Experts,
As per requirement I have created custom field with dropbox and with popup box to cofirm user decision if value from field changes.
Now on Popup when user press Yes then its Ok as no need to change the current value in the field.
but when user press the NO button I want to display the old value on Web UI so now I am able to catch the old value and pass it into the field at backend but I am not able to make the change on the web page.
Please reply if anyone have solution for it.
BR
Gaurav

Hi Gaurav,
First of all when all this is happening in UI why you need to pass the selected value to backend. I didnt get this.
I believe, this is only ui related and the old value which you got can be set in the IMPL class global variable and trigger method set_on_close_event, say here 'CONFIRM_POPUP_CLOSED' as shown below:
gr_popup->set_on_close_event( iv_event_name = 'CONFIRM_POPUP_CLOSED'
                                    iv_view = me ).
Retrive the answer as per selection from popup in method 'CONFIRM_POPUP_CLOSED'
by using:
lv_answer = gr_popup->get_fired_outbound_plug( ).
if lv_answer is NO, then put back the globally stored old value back to dropdown attribute, using:
set_property_by_value method(   iv_attr_name = 'dropdown attr' iv_value = 'old value' )
Thats it. No need to do anything.
Regards,
Bhushan

Open order value showing in VA05 not matching .

Hi Guru ,
In VA05 open order value in not matching with open order value in FD33 in cretit master .
Please provide input .
Edited by: Ravi Deolalikar on Jun 16, 2010 5:24 PM

1/ Check your credit control area settings
2/ Check your sales order config, if it works for one sales order type and not the other compare the two/

FI vs MM report - Stock Values not matching

Dear Experts,
MM Report : We are taking stock value report from MC.9 or MB5L for few sites for the previous financial year.
FI Report : The same sites and same previous year with material G/L account, the t-codes FAGLB03 or S_PL0_86000030 are showing the different values.
The question here is,MM and FI reports are not matching. (FI reports shows Rs.47750 higher than the MM reports). As per the client requirement, the MM & FI reports should match the values. Because all the material movement types are related to FI (For. ex GR & IR )
Kindly tell me, what are the possibilities to go wrong?
How & where to analysis?
Expecting a perfect report which gives the MM & FI values?
Additional details: There is no possibility of manual posting in G/L account. It is automatic posting (Checked in the Tcode - FS00)
I really appreciate if any one help me
Thanks & Regards,
n a v a h s e k

Hello,
I thought, You can post manually to your stock account.
First you can look the account change history for your stock account. Automatic posting check may be change by someone at past, and after manually posting, check it again.
Z programs which is posting FI document with BAPI, system can not look automatic posting checkbox in FS00. May be Z programs posting to your stock without MM module.
How can you catch this document?
Answer is, please add BKPF-AWTYP field to your FBL3N report.
Call SPRO -> Financial Accounting (New) -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable -> Customer Accounts -> Line Items -> Display Line Items -> Define Additional Fields for Line Item Display
Please add new entry with using BKPF-AWTYP then save this customizing and please run RFPOSXEXTEND report with using SE38 transaction. While running this program, a pop-up appear on your screen, please click "YES" after that program will finish correctly. Then you can see "Reference Transact." field in FBL3N report.
Then list your stock account with using this report and get subtotal for "Reference Transact.". If this field value is MKPF, these postings is coming from MM module. If there is a BKPF or BKPFF value, those are posting manually from FI module.
I hope it helps to you,
Regards,
Burak

Value not match in KEAT report with FI

Hi All,
I am going through KEAT report, here is saw that the value of one GL Account in FI value Column does not match with the value of the same GL in FBL3N.
Is there is any particular reason as other GL account value matches with the value in FBL3N.
Regards,
Shayam

KEAT shows values posted from the SD module only. If the value is not the same as the account total, then possibly someone has posted to that account directly from FI (TC FB50 or similar). You should be able to find such manually posted documents in FBL3N by looking at fields like "reference" "document type" and such.

MM vs FI report - Stock Values not matching

Dear Experts,
MM Report : We are taking stock value report from MC.9 or MB5L for few sites for the previous financial year.
FI Report : The same sites and same previous year with material G/L account, the t-codes FAGLB03 or S_PL0_86000030 are showing the different values.
The question here is,MM and FI reports are not matching. (FI reports shows Rs.47750 higher than the MM reports). As per the client requirement, the MM & FI reports should match the values. Because all the material movement types are related to FI (For. ex GR & IR )
Kindly tell me, what are the possibilities to go wrong?
How & where to analysis?
Expecting a perfect report which gives the MM & FI values?
Additional details: There is no possibility of manual posting in G/L account. It is automatic posting (Checked in the Tcode - FS00)
I really appreciate if any one help me
Thanks & Regards,
n a v a h s e k
Edited by: navahsek on Aug 27, 2009 12:17 PM

Tthe stock values are matching in the company code level for previous financial year but when checking for few sties, the stock values are not matching.
For Ex. year 2008 MM Stock values Rs. 10 Lakhs & FI values also same Rs.10 Lakhs for the company code level.
If you check the same for few sites( Site1, site2, site3, site4) & same year, the MM & FI values are different.
I really appreciate if you help in this.
Thanks & Regards,
n a v a h s e k

Aging report and Control account value not matching

Hi All
The value what i am getting from Vendor liabilities aging and Control account is not matching for the same dates, all my parameters or selection criteria are same
Same report if i am taking for the current date it giving correctly,
If i am trying for a previous day the problem is happening
How can i solve this issue

Hi,
Please check if the transactions are done for different Control Accounts and both the account balances are included in the Aging Report.
Also, check that ALL the customers/vendor groups are taken.
Make sure that you are running the backdated aging with the checkbox as mentioned in the Note 800294.
If still facing problems may be you can provide with more details as to what the control account balances and what is the Aging, difference.
PS: Check if there is any manual journal entry is created in the control account?
Kind Regards,
Jitin
SAP Business One Forum Team

Drill down value not matching with Displayed Report Painter Issue-GR55

Hi,
Need your help for an issue in drill down value of report painter from actual cost coloumn.
I have created a new report group based on OSS Note-157720 in GR55 Traction. This new report group will provide data of Planed / Actual cost, Planned / Actual Quantity of the project in range of fiscal year/periods. The issue in this report is displayed data of actual cost is not matching with drill down data. The actual cost coloumn is formula coloumn which framed by subtracting All periods cost coloumn, Before Periods Cost Coloumn and After periods cost coloumn.
Could you suggest on this issue.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Regards,
Rakesh

The report you are running first might have been created with some hidden columns that contain more than one variables relating to period and fiscal year. These may not be matching those that are required to run the drilldown. Look into the definition of the drilldown report. If you would want to match the first report, It may be better to identify which report runs on drilldown and the run that report with the required parameters.

Custom Values not read back from Active area

Hello All,
Need help/ directions.
We have custom fields in UI, which are saved in Custom tables in ECC for reporting purpose. On activation of CR we could save these
values in Ztables, but when use open the Material for Mark for Deletion we are getting SMT Mapping error (Data could not read back to CR).
Don’t see any errors while activating CR , SMT in mapping and also API code program
Best Regards, Srihari Mandapati

Are these custom fields specific to Material or to the Change Request? If for the Change Request, then you don't need any SMT mapping. Please refer to this document for how you can enhance the MDG header: Enhancement of the User Interface Building Block for Change Requests.

Service Level Report values not matching to Service Level Dashboard v 2.0 values

Hi Experts,
We have installed SLD v2 on a development SQL server along with WSS 3.0. The SLD is pointed to the SCOM datawarehouseDB to collect the information to have it up in the dials.
We have SCOM 2007 R2 who's OpsMgrDB and OpsMgrDWDB are hosted on a SQL 2008 R2 instance.
I have created the Distributed application and added 3 Service level Tracking to it.
Availibility
Processor Utilization
Memory Utilization
The problem here i am facing is that the values in the dials on the SLD Home sites do not match with the values i get when i run the report for Service Level Tracking Summary under reporting tab in Ops
Console.
What could be probable reason for this ?
Regards,
Prajul

Hello,
Here are some articles related to this issue. Hope they are helpful.
Running a Service Level Tracking Report
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh212726.aspx
Generating a Service Level Tracking Report
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd441422.aspx
The Service Level Tracking Summary Report in System Center Operations Manager 2007 may be empty if TODAY is not selected for the TO date
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2567404/en-us
Best regards,
Sophia Sun
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

PO & Invoice Value Not Matching during Intercompany STO

Dear MM Gurus,
Need your input for the below issue.
The MRP(Max Retail Price) in PO is being picked from the supplier region and in Invoice
the MRP(Max Retail Price) is picked from the customer region. Due to this the values from
PO to Invoice do not match.
In actual, the PO ZMRP (Max Retail Price)and ZMAR(Margin Price) needs to be picked from the customer
region instead from the supplier region.
Whether the above condition is possible?
If yes pl suggest a solution

hi,
Seems you have defined you own conditions ZMRP and ZMAR in pricing schema.
Check the access sequence for the condition type, which could give the idea on how to maintain.
harish

Utilization values not matching with g/l accounts

Hi Mentors
while I am doing the utilization (J2IUN) FOR the month april my utilization balances not matching with g/l accounts. till the march my balances is tallying.
why i am not tallying in april. please suggest me.
thanks in advance
Laxman

During utilization, the GL balances are read and shown. Hence there should not be any discrepancy. However, please check the GL transactions for the month of April to find out if any non excise posting (a financial JV, for example) has been entered.
Regards,
Aroop

UI Component (h:selectOneMenu) showing old value not matching backing bean

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for