Ultra Simple WCF Interface implementation in Biztalk?

I have a series of WCF services that I need to emulate in BizTalk defined using a pattern like this:
  [ServiceContract(Name = "AssignmentService", Namespace = "http://test.org/webservice")]
  public interface IAssignmentNotification
    [OperationContract(Action = "http://test.org/webservice/Assignment")]
    string Assignment(string assignmentXml);
The strings (in and out) are well formed complex xml documents.  The calling system currently is implemented using this type of interface because there were issues getting well-formed NIEM compliant WCF or Soap documents (I'll save that for a different
post later). 
I have searched around, and I do not seem to be able to find any type of example showing how to receive a string, transform it into an Xml-based message (BTW, BizTalk does appear to consume the XML of the message fine to create an XSD that can be used for
mapping); do a bunch of processing, and then turn around and generate an XmlDocument (again, BizTalk can generate an XSD matching the Xml needed here) and finally transforming it into a string.
I have all of the moving parts working, exception for the pipelines to get the strings in/out in a way that conforms to the desired interface.
Does anyone have any pointers or sample code they could share that does this?
Thanks,
John

One of the way out is for you to create a service (pX). This service is what is exposed with your data contract (publish service as WCF).
This service will then get the string (if you use assignmentXml as distinguished) then in the orchestration you'd get receivedMessage.assignmentXml as a string.
You will then have a message type mXtyp (multi-part) in the orchestration where the message type is of the schema you expect to receive, it could be an XmlDocument also.
Now, on receipt of the message, you will utilize a orchestration variable (varXmlDocument of type XmlDocument) to load the entire string as an XmlDocument (use varXmlDocument.LoadXML(receivedMessage.assignmentXml)) and assign it to a Message (mX) of the
type mXtyp as mX.parameters = varXmlDocument [parameters is the name of the body part defined in multi-part message type (mXtyp).
Then you can use Direct Bound ports and publish this. The orchestration which needs to process this message type can similarly use a direct bound port (two-way) to receive and process the message.
The service orchestration (pX) will receive the response and using a similar assignment (reverse) create an XmlDocument and return the XmlDocument.OuterXML as part of its service response.
Regards.
NOTE: you can make pX a generic service where before publishing you can promote messageType on the message and use XmlDocument as the generic published message to direct bound ports. This way you can use the same endpoint to expose multiple service each
of which can consume a specialized XML request/response.

Similar Messages

  • Is the remote interface implemented by some class

    Hi,
    I have a simple question, googled, no help.
    I am trying to udnerstand, where exactly is the remote interface implemented ?
    I mean, i know that it contains all the business methods which have a body in the bean.
    But is the remote interface implemented somewhere ? Is there any class which implements the Remote interface ?
    thanks
    S

    Sarvananda wrote:
    Hi,
    I have a simple question, googled, no help.look better...
    I am trying to udnerstand, where exactly is the remote interface implemented ?
    I mean, i know that it contains all the business methods which have a body in the bean. so, that's what implements it :)
    But is the remote interface implemented somewhere ? Is there any class which implements the Remote interface ?
    the bean class :)
    But the actual implementor is a class generated by the appserver that delegates to the bean class.

  • Labview Simple User Interface

    I would like to know how to add a simple LED indicator in the TestStand Labview Simple User Interface that would display the Sequence Status( PASSED or FAILED ) ?
    I'm using TestStand 3.1.
    Thanks a lot
    Olivier

    Hi Olivier,
    There are several ways to implement this.
    The quick and easy method would be to read the ItemText from the Executions ComboBox control. Then scan it to see if it contains "Passed".
    (see attached VI)
    An alternative is to setup a TestStand UI Label Control, Using the ExecutionViewManager you can set a CaptionSource to the UUTStatus. This will then contain the UUTStatus of the currently selected execution. This is similar to above except the string will only contain the UUTStatus string, not all of the details in the execution string.
    However a "more complete" method would be to setup a Callback VI for UIMessages, when the UIMsg_ModelState_TestingComplete is recieved, the UUT status can be retrived. (Refer to the TestStand Help file)
    The callback (assuming it has a reference to the LED) can then set the value of it.
    This method is prefered over the above 2 because you do not need to poll the TestStand controls to get the status information. When the TestingComplete event occurs, TestStand will execute the Callback VI.
    I hope this helps.
    Simon Holman
    Software Engineer
    Certified LabVIEW Developer
    Certified TestStand Developer
    measX GmbH & Co. KG.
    http://www.measx.com
    Attachments:
    Simple OI - Top-Level VI (Quick).vi ‏191 KB

  • Unable to deploy a simple WCF REST service on IIS

    Hi,
    I have create a simple WCF based REST service in VS. I am able to run this in VS while deploying it in IIS 8.5 is really difficult. I am not able to do this. Everytime IIS gives 500 error and gives possible errors but not the actual one. Is there any document
    for web service (REST based WCF) deployment on IIS 8.5 which I can refer to.
    Regards,
    UmeshB

    Check if the below articles helps-
    RESTful WCF Architecture
    – Hosting RESTful WCF Services in IIS
    Walkthrough on creating WCF 4.0 Service and Hosting
    Also, where is BizTalk in your flow?
    Thanks,
    Prashant
    Please mark this post accordingly if it answers your query or is helpful.

  • Clear report in report window of simple operator interface

    Hello,
    hello I want to clear the report-window of the simple operator interface at the beginning of each UUT test.
    I want that there is nothing inside this window while testing a UUT. Only at the end of a test I want to show the actual report
    How is this possible?
    regards samuel

    Report.Reset should replace the current report data with the data in the string you specify, which in your case should be blank.
    Do you have a PreUUT Sequence in your Client Sequence File?
    If not try adding the first step in the attached sequence below the Report.Reset step in your PreUUT sequence.  You may need to add the second step as well (below both new steps).  Not sure if the second step is required.  The first step tells the teststand engine that the report has changed, the second tells it to refresh all windows.
    Regards
    Steve
    There are 10 types of people in the world that understand binary, those that do and those that don't.
    Attachments:
    UI Update.seq ‏18 KB

  • How to Create simple WCF/REST (JOSN,get and post) and deploy to Sharepoint 2013 Server.

    HI All,
       I wan to create a simple WCF/REST service and deployed to SharePoint server , i have created some sample svc file and put in to _vti_bin folder using SharePoint solution using vs 2013 but its not accessible from IIS its always asking the Widows
    Authentcation .
    however my exact requirement is custom service should be accessible without asking the authentication like _vti_bin/Listdata.svc is there any way to do like this ? 
    my reference:
    http://platinumdogs.me/2013/03/14/sharepoint-adventures-with-the-rest-api-part-1/
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/jj860569(v=office.15).aspx
    http://dotnetmentors.com/wcf/wcf-rest-service-to-get-or-post-json-data-and-retrieve-json-data-with-datacontract.aspx
    http://stevenhollidge.blogspot.in/2011/09/wcfwebapi-rest-json-services.html
    Thanks
    SujilKumar
    Software developer

    Hi Sujil
    Greetings. pls check this link
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/24194.sharepoint-2013-create-a-custom-wcf-rest-service-hosted-in-sharepoint-and-deployed-in-a-wsp.aspx
    Please remember to click 'Mark as Answer' on the answer if it helps you

  • How to register new interface implementation?

    Hi,
    I have the following problem:
    There exists a self written webdynpro application. This application uses a Java Interface. The administrator of the application can add new functionality to the application by adding a new line to a table. He inserts the name of a class which implements that Java interface. This class has the new functionality.
    For each interface implementation the user of the webdynpro gets a value into a list. He can select an entry from this list. This value tells to the application that it has to create an object from the related java interface implementation.
    Now I wonder how I can tell to the webdynpro application that it knows all interface implementations which will come in the future? If I do not "register" or reference the new interface implementations, then I think the webdynpro application has ClassNotFound errors.
    The developers should make there own projects for each interface implementation an deploy them. But what must be done, that the webdynpro application knows them?
    Can you please give me some suggestions?
    Thank you and best regards,
    Marcus

    You can register a Mac, but not an accessory like the Time Capsule. Keep a copy of your sales receipt.....just in case.

  • Designs for interface/implementation factory APIs

    I've been building a complex data store for geographical information based on JNDI.
    The store is basically working but I've been trying to make the API for programs accessing it more regular.
    I'm dissatisfied with the way that new objects for addition to the store are instanciated. It's all a bit ad-hoc at the moment so I want to create a proper factory system, separating interface from implementation and allowing for the case where the interface has a different implentation for remote and local contexts.
    I'm thinking the best approach would be to have a single create method, probably as a member of the extended context interface.
    What I want to get is a sample of how programmers feal about different methods of passing creation parameters to such a factory method (or for that matter, to invite comments on the basic idea).
    One possibility would be as a Hashtable or Hashmap. Generic keys (like datastore path) would be defined as constants in the context or factory interface, type specific keys in the interface which is used to access the object being created.
    e.g.
    Hashtable fsCreate = new Hashtable(5);
    fgCreate.put(DataContext.PATH_KEY, "test.features");
    fgCreate.put(DataContext.FORMAT_KEY, format);
    fgCreate.put(DataContext.BOUNDS_KEY, boundaryRectangle);
    FeatureSet fs = (FeatureSet)dataContext.create(FeatureSet.TYPE_VALUE,fsCreate);Another possibility would be some kind of parameter bean, with an fundamental parameter class and different extensions for each type of object to be created.
    FeatureSetParams fsCreate = new fsCreate();
    fsCreate.setPath("test.features");
    fsCreate.setFormat(format);
    fgCreate.setBounds(boundaryRectangle);
    FeatureSet fs = (FeatureSet)dataContext.create(fgCreate);The Hashtable method has a slightly clumbsy feel, but it does avoid directly instanciating a whole bunch of new concrete classes (which seems to go against the spirit of interface/implementation separation).

    If there's a create method in the interface, wouldn't
    that make it accessible from anything that knows about
    the interface? This would nullify the factory
    pattern, wouldn't it?Not necesasrilly, that would depend how the create method was implemented. I already have a "retriever" object associated with each implentation class that can be retrieved from the data store. I can add a "create" method, effectively adding a factory class function to these. These retrievers are already registered with the concrete implentation of the JNDI Context.
    Granted the implentations are in several different packages, so I can't restrict acces to these retriever objects to the package level.

  • Component interface ( implementation ) is missing

    Hello,
    I had imported from NWDI one SWC that have some DC's. When I create a project in NWDS form one DC  that have a dependence from another DC where the project has bveen already created in NWDS I have the following error message for this DC: "<error: missing compoent> component interface ( implementation ) is missisng". When I delete the referenced DCt from NWDS and sync used DC's from the DC with the error, the problem is solved.
    But, when I create the refereced DC again, the DC that use this, the error missing component occurs again.
    Anybody have any ideia about this?
    thanks in advance.

    You are absolute right in this, but this is not my problem. I will try to explain it once again. Currently I have the following configuration on my PE router
    router ospf 5628 vrf INET
    network 194.154.224.0 0.0.31.255 area 0
    the f0/0 interface has this configuration
    interface FastEthernet0/0
    ip vrf forwarding INET
    ip address 194.154.236.43 255.255.255.248
    The problem is, that using this configuration, hello packets are send also through other interfaces of my PE router, which are part of the same ip address range specified under ospf process and are in the same vrf. In other words, hello packets are send to my Internet customers, which is not good. Because it is not possible to configure passive interface under ospf in the VRF, I decided to make the network statement more specific. I have changed the configuration to
    router ospf 5628 vrf INET
    network 194.154.236.40 0.0.0.7 area 0
    and got the message
    %OSPF: OSPF not enabled on FastEthernet0/0
    The question is, why is OSPF not enabled on my f0/0, as the ip address of my f0/0 is part of a 194.154.236.40 0.0.0.7 network ?

  • Programatically Loading Several Sequences Using LV Simple Operator Interface

    I am playing around with the supplied LV(2009) Simple Operator Interface for running TestStand (4.2) and hoping that someone can point me in the right direction.  I know this may be too generic for a concise solution, but hopefully I can get some suggestions on the best approach for this. Here is a short description of what I am trying to accomplish. 
    I am testing 2 unique UUTs on a single test fixture that is controlled by a PCI-7831R DAQ.  Each UUT will have a unique serial number and report generated.  Therefore, I am using 2 unique sequence files created using TestStand.  Basically, I want to be able to read in a barcode on the test fixture and have the operator interface load the 2 unique sequence files based on information contained in the barcode.  The operator will then hit a button to start the sequence file executions.  I want the first sequence file to run and test the first UUT.  Once the first sequence file is finished, I want the second sequence file to load and run on the second UUT.
    I can use the simple operator interface to load both sequence files.  I then have to select the combo box to select which one I want to run.  This works fine, however, I am trying to automate this so that the operator doesn't have to open the files and continually use the combo box to select sequence files.
    Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

    I have figured out a solution (for my initial application at least) of programmatically loading the sequence files.  When the operator interface first starts, there is a prompt where the user will scan a barcode that is loaded on the front of the fixture.  For all of our product lines, we will have a unique format for the fixture barcode.  Included in this barcode is a product specific software ID number.  I create a folder with the same software ID number and store the sequence files there.  I then parse the barcode and open all *.seq files in that folder.  I have this working correctly now. 
    Once the sequence files are opened, the user must scan each UUT ID barcode before installing them on the fixture.  The intent is to have both UUTs installed on the fixture at the same time so they can be tested serially.  If, however, they do not scan one of the UUTs, it will not be tested.  Basically this is due to the fact that they may want to run only a single board.  Once all of the UUT barcode scanning has been completed, I have another button that will execute the sequence files using the 'Single Pass' execution entry point.  I agree that the 'Single Pass' and 'Test UUTs' points should be hidden from the user.  Once the execute test(s) button is pressed, it will check each UUT barcode to make sure that it is valid.  If both UUT's have valid barcodes, it will run the first UUT and then the second using the 2 sequence files that were previously loaded, otherwise, it will run only one or the other.  The UUT(s) will then be removed and the process starts over again from the UUT ID barcode scanning.  They will not have to scan the fixture barcode again since the correct sequence files have already been loaded.
    Currently I have the UUT/Sequence File associations hard-coded in the UI.  I will need to put my thinking cap on so that as we increase the product lines (several are already in the pipeline) we can use the same UI without any modifications.  Scalability is King!

  • Simple Operator Interface hungs up while executing a testsequence

    Hello,
    My operator interface hungs up sometimes while executing a testsequence.
    It hungs up every time after the PostUUT has passed
    The attached error description is available
    can anybody help me
    regards samuel
    Attachments:
    errors1.rtf ‏2566 KB

    Ray,
    I have created my own PreUUT.
    In this PreUUT I call the dll for the PopUp windows to enter serial numbers and to select specified UUTs etc...
    Yes I have tried to single step through the sequence but then the Problem doesn't occure. (I run it than in the Teststand developer environment) The problem only  occures when I use my modified Operator Interface on the second computer. (on my first computer it works without problems)
    My suspicion is that my modified simple operator interface makes the problem
    what can be the problem? what dlls does the simple operator interface use? Is it possible that on my second computer some standard teststand or Lab Windows CVI dlls are not up to date?
    regards samuel

  • Building a simple User Interface

    HI,
    I'm interested in building a very simple User Interface. All I want to see is a panel with buttons and each button will execute a test sequence file.
    1) Is it possible to create such a panel with CVI or LV and then call a sequence file which will be handled by TS?
    In that case, I would expect to see TS panels while executing the sequence and once finished (or closed by the user) to come back to the original panel that calls the sequences.
    2) is it better to create this panel with TS utility? (I have never done it and suspect it will not be a simple job).
    Thanks
    Rafi

    You can do this in test stand if a simple interface containing just a prompt and buttons will do. In your main sequence, the first step is to create a MessagePopup step. Put a title like "Test Selection". Put a message like "Choose a Test". Label button 1 "test 1". Label button 2 "test 2", and so on. Create a local numerical variable called TestNum. In the post expression section of the first step, add the line Locals.TestNum = Step.Result.ButtonHit. You next step can be a sequence call to the first test sequence. Add a precondition that Locals.TestNum==1. The following steps can all be sequence calls to your other test sequences with preconditions of Locals.TestNum==x, where x is the number corresponding to the button hit in step one. When the selected test sequence is done, the main sequence will be repeated with the message popup asking for a test to run.
    - tbob
    Inventor of the WORM Global

  • Anonymous class instantiation expression with interface implementation??

    Is it possible to create an inline anonymous class instatiation expression that can implements an interface?
    For example:
    Frame myFrame = new Frame() implements WindowListner {
         public void WindowOpened(WindowEvent  e) {}
             +other interface methods....+
    }Apparently compiler doesn't like this code:(
    I know that I can create an extra named class with the interface, then instantiate it instead. But this is not what I want.
    (By the way, if someone wants to know why I want to do this, I say I think this may make my code simpler or look better, that's all:) )

    abstract class ListenerFrame extends Frame implements WindowListener {} This look pretty neat:)
    I guess I can rewrite my code then:
    abstract class FrameWithListener extends Frame
             implements WindowListener{}      //local class
    Frame myFrame = new FrameWithListener {
            public void WindowOpened {}
               blah, blah...
    }Not sure I can use abstarct class as local class, but otherwise I'll use it as a class member or some sort..
    Thank you for the reply
    Edited by: JavaToTavaL on Nov 27, 2009 4:04 AM
    Edited by: JavaToTavaL on Nov 27, 2009 4:04 AM

  • Teststand Simple User Interface in LabVIEW

    Hello Community,
    I am designing a user interface for Teststand by using the simple example vi provided. The name of the file is Top-Level VI.vi
    I am trying to understand how the vi works inorder to make changes and ran into a few questions that I was hoping someone could answer for me please.
    To start I add my sequence file and click "Test UUTs". Then a dialog box pops up asking to enter the serial number of the UUT, where and what causes that to happen in the code? After I enter my serial number it runs my sequence code and at the end another message box appears specifing in a green or red whether the UUT passed or failed. Where and what causes the Pass/Fail Boxes to happen in the code?
    Thank you
    Kevin
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    The S/N dialog is part of the process model.
    For the Sequential Model (SequentialModel.seq), the default S/N dialog in found in the 'PreUUT' sub-sequence and implemented as a DLL call.
    The PreUUT sub-sequence of the SequentialModel is a callback, so you can override it in your own test sequence.
    Now is the right time to use %^<%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%3uZ>T
    If you don't hate time zones, you're not a real programmer.
    "You are what you don't automate"
    Inplaceness is synonymous with insidiousness

  • How can I get this (non-BizTalk) WCF customBinding configuration into BizTalk? (see sample in post)

    I have a BizTalk app up and running that is currently using the WCF-BasicHttp Adapter. It's currently using only Message security using the UserName credential type and that is all working fine.
    Things have since changed, we are now required to accept Client Certificates at the Transport (IIS) level for authorization of the service and still continue to use Message security for authentication into the service.
    After much pain and searching, I was able to get this to work in a NON-BizTalk WCF environment basing my config of bits of this
    this post and ended up with the following customBinding configuration:
          <customBinding>
            <binding name="CustomCDARequestEndpointBinding">                    
              <textMessageEncoding messageVersion="Soap11" />
              <security authenticationMode="UserNameOverTransport" />
              <httpsTransport requireClientCertificate="true" />
            </binding>
          </customBinding>
    This resulted in a WCF client customBinding as such:
    <customBinding>
    <binding name="CDARequestEndpoint">
    <security defaultAlgorithmSuite="Default" authenticationMode="UserNameOverTransport"
    requireDerivedKeys="true" includeTimestamp="true" messageSecurityVersion="WSSecurity11WSTrustFebruary2005WSSecureConversationFebruary2005WSSecurityPolicy11BasicSecurityProfile10">
    <localClientSettings detectReplays="false" />
    <localServiceSettings detectReplays="false" />
    </security>
    <textMessageEncoding messageVersion="Soap11" />
    <httpsTransport requireClientCertificate="true" />
    </binding>
    </customBinding>
    </bindings>
    <behaviors>
    <endpointBehaviors>
    <behavior name="ohBehave">
    <clientCredentials useIdentityConfiguration="false">
    <clientCertificate findValue="6D0DBF387484B25A16D0E3E53DBB178A366DA954" storeLocation="CurrentUser"
    x509FindType="FindByThumbprint" />
    </clientCredentials>
    </behavior>
    </endpointBehaviors>
    </behaviors>
    This works perfectly fine in a NON-BizTalk environment and it seems to be the critical piece of configuration is the 
    <httpsTransport requireClientCertificate="true" />
    element. 
    The problem is, no matter what I try, I cannot find a similar setting in the BizTalk WCF-Custom/customBinding configuration anywhere.
    Does anyone know what my options are here?
    Can I edit the web.config directly?
    Is there another extension I can add to achieve the same effect in the BizTalk GUI?
    Can I code something in the orchestration to manually setup this receive location the why I'm proposing?
    I'm hoping someone out there knows more about this.

    Because the WCF-BasicHttp Adapter only surfaces certain properties, you can't use it for your purpose.
    Instead:
    Start with the WCF-Custom Adapter
    BindingType = customBinding
    Delete httpTransport
    Add httpsTransport (you will then see requireClientCertificate)
    Add the clientCredentials Behavior and set your options and credentials in the Credentials tab.

Maybe you are looking for