Unable to destroy ZFS pool

Hello everyone,
is there any way how to remove suspended ZFS pool when underlying storage has been removed from the OS?
# zpool status test
pool: test
state: SUSPENDED
status: One or more devices are faulted in response to IO failures.
action: Make sure the affected devices are connected, then run 'zpool clear'.
see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-HC
scan: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
test UNAVAIL 0 0 0 experienced I/O failures
c2t50060E8016068817d2 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 experienced I/O failures
All the zpool operations hang on the system :
# ps -ef |grep zpool
root 5 0 0 May 16 ? 151:42 zpool-rpool
root 19747 1 0 Jun 02 ? 0:00 zpool clear test
root 12714 1 0 Jun 02 ? 0:00 zpool destroy test
root 9450 1 0 Jun 02 ? 0:00 zpool history test
root 13592 1 0 Jun 02 ? 0:00 zpool destroy test
root 19684 1 0 May 30 ? 0:00 zpool destroy -f test
root 9166 0 0 May 30 ? 0:07 zpool-test
root 18514 1 0 Jun 02 ? 0:00 zpool destroy -f test
root 3327 0 0 May 30 ? 4:25 zpool-OScopy
root 7332 1 0 May 30 ? 0:00 zpool clear test
root 5016 1 0 Jun 02 ? 0:00 zpool online test c2t50060E8016068817d2
root 25080 1 0 Jun 01 ? 0:00 zpool clear test
root 23451 1 0 01:26:57 ? 0:00 zpool destroy test
Disk is not more visible on the system:
# ls -la /dev/dsk/c2t50060e8016068817d2*
/dev/dsk/c2t50060e8016068817d2*: No such file
Any suggestions how to remove the pool without preforming reboot?
Thanks in advance for any help

I had the same issue recently (solaris 11.1 system) where I deleted a LUN from the SAN before destroying a zpool on it. The pool was suspended and all operations on it failed. I also tried a zpool clear but that did not work and additionally, all other operations on other zpools were also hanging after that. The "workaround" was to delete /etc/zpool.cache and reboot the system.
I raised an SR and a feature request for this but to my knowledge, nothing has been done yet. There is note 1457074.1 on MOS that describes this for Solaris 10 (including a bug and patch) and claims that solaris 11 is not affected.
good luck
bjoern

Similar Messages

SFTP chroot from non-global zone to zfs pool

Hi,
I am unable to create an SFTP chroot inside a zone to a shared folder on the global zone.
Inside the global zone:
I have created a zfs pool (rpool/data) and then mounted it to /data.
I then created some shared folders: /data/sftp/ipl/import and /data/sftp/ipl/export
I then created a non-global zone and added a file system that loops back to /data.
Inside the zone:
I then did the ususal stuff to create a chroot sftp user, similar to: http://nixinfra.blogspot.com.au/2012/12/openssh-chroot-sftp-setup-in-linux.html
I modifed the /etc/ssh/sshd_config file and hard wired the ChrootDirectory to /data/sftp/ipl.
When I attempt to sftp into the zone an error message is displayed in the zone -> fatal: bad ownership or modes for chroot directory /data/
Multiple web sites warn that folder ownership and access privileges is important. However, issuing chown -R root:iplgroup /data made no difference. Perhaps it is something todo with the fact the folders were created in the global zone?
If I create a simple shared folder inside the zone it works, e.g. /data3/ftp/ipl......ChrootDirectory => /data3/ftp/ipl
If I use the users home directory it works. eg /export/home/sftpuser......ChrootDirectory => %h
FYI. The reason for having a ZFS shared folder is to allow separate SFTP and FTP zones and a common/shared data repository for FTP and SFTP exchanges with remote systems. e.g. One remote client pushes data to the FTP server. A second remote client pulls the data via SFTP. Having separate zones increases security?
Any help would be appreciated to solve this issue.
Regards John

sanjaykumarfromsymantec wrote:
Hi,
I want to do IPC between inter-zones ( commnication between processes running two different zones). So what are the different techniques can be used. I am not interested in TCP/IP ( AF_INET) sockets.Zones are designed to prevent most visibility between non-global zones and other zones. So network communication (like you might use between two physical machines) are the most common method.
You could mount a global zone filesystem into multiple non-global zones (via lofs) and have your programs push data there. But you'll probably have to poll for updates. I'm not certain that's easier or better than network communication.
Darren

ISCSI array died, held ZFS pool. Now box han

I was doing some iSCSI testing and, on an x86 EM64T server running an out-of-the box install of Solaris 10u5, created a ZFS pool on two RAID-0 arrays on an IBM DS300 iSCSI enclosure.
One of the disks in the array died, the DS300 got really flaky, and now the Solaris box gets hung in boot. It looks like it's trying to mount the ZFS filesystems. The box has two ZFS pools, or had two, anyway. The other ZFS pool has some VirtualBox images filling it.
Originally, I got a few iSCSI target offline messages on the console, so I booted to failsafe and tried to run iscsiadm to remove the targets, but that wouldn't work. So I just removed the contents of /etc/iscsi and all the iSCSI instances in /etc/path_to_inst on the root drive.
Now the box hangs with no error messages.
Anyone have any ideas what to do next? I'm willing to nuke the iSCSI ZFS pool as it's effectively gone anyway, but I would like to save the VirtualBox ZFS pool, if possible. But they are all test images, so I don't have to save them. The host itself is a test host with nothing irreplaceable on it, so I could just reinstall Solaris. But I'd prefer to figure out how to save it, even if only for the learning experience.

Try this. Disconnect the iSCSI drives completely, then boot. My fallback plan on zfs if things get screwed up is to physically disconnect the zfs drives so that solaris doesn't see them on boot. It marks them failed and should boot. Once it's up, zpool destroy the pools WITH THE DRIVES DISCONNECTED so that it doesn't think there's a pool anymore. THEN reconnect the drives and try to do a "zpool import -f".
The pools that are on intact drives should be still ok. In theory :)
BTW, if you removed devices, you probably should do a reconfiguration boot (create a /a/reconfigure in failsafe mode) and make sure the devices gets reprobed. Does the thing boot in single user ( pass -s after the multiboot line in grub )? If it does, you can disable the iscsi svcs with "svcadm disable network/iscsi_initiator; svcadm disable iscsitgt".

Unable to wipe ZFS partition table from the disk

I used an SD card as part of a zfs zpool made of three SD cards, without partition table. ZFS was managing the entire devices, not just partitions.
I subsequently retired this zpool but did not run “zpool destroy”. This worked for two of the cards, but it seems as if one of the SD cards just can’t shake the zfs_member marker, no matter what I do.
So far I tried multiple times, on several different machines (including two without ZOL installed, so zfs cache file is not an issue here):
1. dd the entire device with zeros. Four times.
2. zpool labelclear -f /dev/sdc
3. create new msdos partition table in gparted and fdisk
4.
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/usb
mount: unknown filesystem type 'zfs_member'
Unable to wipe ZFS partition table from the disk
5. Windows format and Partition Minitools windows equivalent of gparted.
As you can see, none of those methods wrote over the zfs data. It remains intact and invulnerable to anything I tried.
I am out of ideas. It looks like google is out of ideas, too.

Yeah, somehow while writing the first post I missed that wipefs also does absolutely nothing.
# wipefs /dev/sdc
offset type
0x23000 zfs_member [raid]
LABEL: SD
UUID: 9662645799256520897
# wipefs /dev/sdc -o 0x23000
/dev/sdc: 8 bytes were erased at offset 0x00023000 (zfs_member): 0c b1 ba 00 00 00 00 00
# wipefs /dev/sdc
offset type
0x23000 zfs_member [raid]
LABEL: SD
UUID: 9662645799256520897

FTP error-Unable to create new pooled resource: com.sap.aii.adapter.file.ft

Hi,
We have a scenario where XI receives a Idoc and based on the contents of Idoc, It will generate 5 different files and send it to the external FTP server.We configured 5 receiver channels for these 5 files.
When this interface runs, most of the files will be delivered but some of the messages will be errored out.
The receiver channel has shown the following error-
Message processing failed. Cause: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Error when getting an FTP connection from connection pool: com.sap.aii.af.service.util.concurrent.ResourcePoolException: Unable to create new pooled resource: com.sap.aii.adapter.file.ftp.FTPEx
I tried to resend them by temperorily stopping other channels to reduce connections to this FTP server.But these messages again resulted with same error.
Can someone suggest what might be the cause for this error.
Thanks in advance.

Hi ,
As I am not sure about the problem so U just try all of the option I am writing below. It may help u as these are the probable solutions for this problem.
1.perform Full CPA cache refresh using PIDIRUSER
2.The problem seems to be in establishing the connection with the File server . This could be due to
a. Wrong user name or password in receiver adapter .
b. Firewall connection are not open
actually you are saying that some files are being delivered so all the file has to be deliverd on same server on diffrent directory or all files are going on diffrent server at present I am assuming that all files are going on diffrent server so please check UID & PWD properly.if they are on same server but diff. directory it can be easily done using one Communication channel only.
3. Finally please check the errorneous communication channel .
to check your communication channels are working fine or not you can check in channel monitoring in PI7.0, adapter monitoring in Xi3.0.
if you are on PI7.0, goto RWBCache monitoring select AE and cilck disply-select the date todays--check everything is greent here
4.Please check your maximal connection pool .
Regards,
Saurabh

File Adapter - FTP - Unable to Create new pooled resource

Hi Friends,
I am getting the following error while using file adapter with FTP protocol...
Attempt to process file failed with Error when getting an FTP connection from connection pool: com.sap.aii.af.service.util.concurrent.ResourcePoolException: Unable to create new pooled resource: FTPEx: PASS command failed
Error MP: Exception caught with cause com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Error when getting an FTP connection from connection pool: com.sap.aii.af.service.util.concurrent.ResourcePoolException: Unable to create new pooled resource: FTPEx: PASS command failed
Error Exception caught by adapter framework: Error when getting an FTP connection from connection pool: com.sap.aii.af.service.util.concurrent.ResourcePoolException: Unable to create new pooled resource: FTPEx: PASS command failed
Error Delivery of the message to the application using connection File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Error when getting an FTP connection from connection pool: com.sap.aii.af.service.util.concurrent.ResourcePoolException: Unable to create new pooled resource: FTPEx: PASS command failed.
Can someone help me to solve this probelm..
Regards,
Shyam.

Hi,
Try to check the directory you have specified in the CC and also check whether you are able to connect to the FTP server with those login credential and access the directory specified.
Also let me know whether it is working fine for other scenario's or not.
Regards,
Nithiyanandam

Solaris 10 upgrade and zfs pool import

Hello folks,
I am currently running "Solaris 10 5/08 s10x_u5wos_10 X86" on a Sun Thumper box where two drives are mirrored UFS boot volume and the rest is used in ZFS pools. I would like to upgrade my system to "10/08 s10x_u6wos_07b X86" to be able to use ZFS for the boot volume. I've seen documentation that describes how to break the mirror, create new BE and so on. This system is only being used as iSCSI target for windows systems so there is really nothing on the box that i need other then my zfs pools. Could i simply pop the DVD in and perform a clean install and select my current UFS drives as my install location, basically telling Solaris to wipe them clean and create an rpool out of them. Once the installation is complete, would i be able to import my existing zfs pools ?
Thank you very much

Sure. As long as you don't write over any of the disks in your ZFS pool you should be fine.
Darren

Zfs pool I/O failures

Hello,
Been using an external SAS/SATA tray connected to a t5220 using a SAS cable as storage for a media library. The weekly scrub cron failed last week with all disks reporting I/O failures:
zpool status
pool: media_NAS
state: SUSPENDED
status: One or more devices are faulted in response to IO failures.
action: Make sure the affected devices are connected, then run 'zpool clear'.
   see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-HC
scan: scrub in progress since Thu Apr 30 09:43:00 2015
    2.34T scanned out of 9.59T at 14.7M/s, 143h43m to go
    0 repaired, 24.36% done
config:
        NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
        media_NAS   UNAVAIL 10.6K    75     0 experienced I/O failures
          raidz2-0 UNAVAIL 21.1K    10     0 experienced I/O failures
            c6t0d0 UNAVAIL    212     6     0 experienced I/O failures
            c6t1d0 UNAVAIL    216     6     0 experienced I/O failures
            c6t2d0 UNAVAIL    225     6     0 experienced I/O failures
            c6t3d0 UNAVAIL    217     6     0 experienced I/O failures
            c6t4d0 UNAVAIL    202     6     0 experienced I/O failures
            c6t5d0 UNAVAIL    189     6     0 experienced I/O failures
            c6t6d0 UNAVAIL    187     6     0 experienced I/O failures
            c6t7d0 UNAVAIL    219    16     0 experienced I/O failures
            c6t8d0 UNAVAIL    185     6     0 experienced I/O failures
            c6t9d0 UNAVAIL    187     6     0 experienced I/O failures
The console outputs this repeated error:
SUNW-MSG-ID: ZFS-8000-FD, TYPE: Fault, VER: 1, SEVERITY: Major
EVENT-TIME: 20
PLATFORM: SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5220, CSN: -, HOSTNAME: t5220-nas
SOURCE: zfs-diagnosis, REV: 1.0
EVENT-ID: e935894e-9ab5-cd4a-c90f-e26ee6a4b764
DESC: The number of I/O errors associated with a ZFS device exceeded acceptable levels.
AUTO-RESPONSE: The device has been offlined and marked as faulted. An attempt will be made to activate a hot spare if available.
IMPACT: Fault tolerance of the pool may be compromised.
REC-ACTION: Use 'fmadm faulty' to provide a more detailed view of this event. Run 'zpool status -x' for more information. Please refer to the associated reference document at http://sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-FD for the latest service procedures and policies regarding this diagnosis.
Chassis | major: Host detected fault, MSGID: ZFS-8000-FD
/var/adm/messages has an error message for each disk in the data pool, this being the error for sd7:
May 3 16:24:02 t5220-nas scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /pci@0/pci@0/p
ci@9/scsi@0/disk@2,0 (sd7):
May 3 16:24:02 t5220-nas       Error for Command: read(10)                Error
Level: Fatal
May 3 16:24:02 t5220-nas scsi: [ID 107833 kern.notice]         Requested Block:
1815064264                Error Block: 1815064264
Have tried rebooting the system and running zpool clear as the zfs link in the console errors suggest. Sometimes the system will reboot fine, other times it requires issuing a break from LOM, because the shutdown command is still trying after more than an hour.   The console usually outputs more messages, as the reboot is completing, basically saying the faulted hardware has been restored, and no additional action is required. A scrub is recommended in the console message. When I check the pool status the previously suspended scrub starts back where it left off:
zpool status
pool: media_NAS
state: ONLINE
scan: scrub in progress since Thu Apr 30 09:43:00 2015
    5.83T scanned out of 9.59T at 165M/s, 6h37m to go
    0 repaired, 60.79% done
config:
        NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
        media_NAS   ONLINE       0     0     0
          raidz2-0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t0d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t1d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t2d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t3d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t4d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t5d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t6d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t7d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t8d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t9d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
errors: No known data errors
Then after an hour or two all the disks go back into an I/O error state.   Thought it might be the SAS controller card, PCI slot, or maybe the cable, so tried using the other PCI slot in the riser card first (don't have another cable available).   Now the system is back online and again trying to complete the previous scrub:
zpool status
pool: media_NAS
state: ONLINE
scan: scrub in progress since Thu Apr 30 09:43:00 2015
    5.58T scanned out of 9.59T at 139M/s, 8h26m to go
    0 repaired, 58.14% done
config:
        NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
        media_NAS   ONLINE       0     0     0
          raidz2-0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t0d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t1d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t2d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t3d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t4d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t5d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t6d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t7d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t8d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
            c6t9d0 ONLINE       0     0     0
errors: No known data errors
the zfs file systems are mounted:
bash# df -h|grep media
media_NAS               14T   493K   6.3T     1%    /media_NAS
media_NAS/archive       14T   784M   6.3T     1%    /media_NAS/archive
media_NAS/exercise      14T    42G   6.3T     1%    /media_NAS/exercise
media_NAS/ext_subs      14T   3.9M   6.3T     1%    /media_NAS/ext_subs
media_NAS/movies        14T   402K   6.3T     1%    /media_NAS/movies
media_NAS/movies/bluray    14T   4.0T   6.3T    39%    /media_NAS/movies/bluray
media_NAS/movies/dvd    14T   585K   6.3T     1%    /media_NAS/movies/dvd
media_NAS/movies/hddvd    14T   176G   6.3T     3%    /media_NAS/movies/hddvd
media_NAS/movies/mythRecordings    14T   329K   6.3T     1%    /media_NAS/movies/mythRecordings
media_NAS/music         14T   347K   6.3T     1%    /media_NAS/music
media_NAS/music/flac    14T    54G   6.3T     1%    /media_NAS/music/flac
media_NAS/mythTV        14T    40G   6.3T     1%    /media_NAS/mythTV
media_NAS/nuc-celeron    14T   731M   6.3T     1%    /media_NAS/nuc-celeron
media_NAS/pictures      14T   5.1M   6.3T     1%    /media_NAS/pictures
media_NAS/television    14T   3.0T   6.3T    33%    /media_NAS/television
but the format command is not seeing any of the disks:
format
Searching for disks...done
AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
       0. c1t0d0 <SEAGATE-ST9146803SS-0006 cyl 65533 alt 2 hd 2 sec 2187>
          /pci@0/pci@0/pci@2/scsi@0/sd@0,0
       1. c1t1d0 <SUN146G cyl 14087 alt 2 hd 24 sec 848>
          /pci@0/pci@0/pci@2/scsi@0/sd@1,0
       2. c1t2d0 <SUN146G cyl 14087 alt 2 hd 24 sec 848>
          /pci@0/pci@0/pci@2/scsi@0/sd@2,0
       3. c1t3d0 <SUN146G cyl 14087 alt 2 hd 24 sec 848> solaris
          /pci@0/pci@0/pci@2/scsi@0/sd@3,0
Before moving the card into the other slot in the riser card format saw each disk in the zfs pool.    Not sure why the disks are not seen in format but the zfs pool seems to be available to the OS.    The disks in the attached tray were setup for Solaris to see using the Sun StorageTek RAID Manager, they were passed as 2TB raid0 components to Solaris, and format saw them as available 2TB disks.    Any suggestions as to how to proceed if the scrub completes with the SAS card in the new I/O slot?    Should I force a reconfigure of devices on the next reboot? If the disks fault out again with I/O errors in this slot, the next steps were to try a new SAS card and/or cable. Does that sound reasonable?
Thanks,

Was the system online (and the ZFS pool) too when you moved the card? That might explain why the disks are confused. Obviously, this system is experiencing some higher level problem like a bad card or cable because disks generally don't fall over at the same time. I would let the scrub finish, if possible, and shut the system down. Bring the system to single-user mode, and review the zpool import data around the device enumeration. If the device info looks sane, then import the pool. This should re-read the device info. If the device info is still not available during the zpool import scan, then you need to look at a higher level.
Thanks, Cindy

Large number of Transport errors on ZFS pool

This is sort of a continuation of thread:
Issues with HBA and ZFS
But since it is a separate question thought I'd start a new thread.
Because of a bug in 11.1, I had to downgrade to 10_U11. Using an LSI 9207-8i HBA (SAS2308 chipset). I have no errors on my pools but i consistently see errors when trying to read from the disks. They are always Retryable or Reset. All in all the system functions but as I started testing I am seeing a lot of errors in IOSTAT.
bash-3.2# iostat -exmn
extended device statistics ---- errors ---
r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b s/w h/w trn tot device
0.1 0.2 1.0 28.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.8 0 1 0 0 1489 1489 c0t5000C500599DDBB3d0
0.0 0.7 0.2 75.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 63.4 1 1 0 1 679 680 c0t5000C500420F6833d0
0.0 0.7 0.3 74.6 0.0 0.0 20.9 69.8 1 1 0 0 895 895 c0t5000C500420CDFD3d0
0.0 0.6 0.4 75.5 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.7 1 1 0 1 998 999 c0t5000C500420FB3E3d0
0.0 0.6 0.4 75.3 0.0 0.0 18.3 68.7 0 1 0 1 877 878 c0t5000C500420F5C43d0
0.0 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 c0t5000C500420CE623d0
0.0 0.6 0.3 76.0 0.0 0.0 20.7 67.8 0 1 0 0 638 638 c0t5000C500420CD537d0
0.0 0.6 0.2 74.9 0.0 0.0 24.6 72.6 1 1 0 0 638 638 c0t5000C5004210A687d0
0.0 0.6 0.3 76.2 0.0 0.0 20.0 78.4 1 1 0 1 858 859 c0t5000C5004210A4C7d0
0.0 0.6 0.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 22.8 69.1 0 1 0 0 648 648 c0t5000C500420C5E27d0
0.6 43.8 21.3 96.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0 1 0 14 144 158 c0t5000C500420CDED7d0
0.0 0.6 0.3 75.7 0.0 0.0 23.0 67.6 1 1 0 2 890 892 c0t5000C500420C5E1Bd0
0.0 0.6 0.3 73.9 0.0 0.0 28.6 66.5 1 1 0 0 841 841 c0t5000C500420C602Bd0
0.0 0.6 0.3 73.6 0.0 0.0 25.5 65.7 0 1 0 0 678 678 c0t5000C500420D013Bd0
0.0 0.6 0.3 76.5 0.0 0.0 23.5 74.9 1 1 0 0 651 651 c0t5000C500420C50DBd0
0.0 0.6 0.7 70.1 0.0 0.1 22.9 82.9 1 1 0 2 1153 1155 c0t5000C500420F5DCBd0
0.0 0.6 0.4 75.3 0.0 0.0 19.2 58.8 0 1 0 1 682 683 c0t5000C500420CE86Bd0
0.0 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 c0t5000C500420F3EDBd0
0.1 0.2 1.0 26.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.9 0 1 0 0 1511 1511 c0t5000C500599E027Fd0
2.2 0.3 133.9 28.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 0 1 0 17 1342 1359 c0t5000C500599DD9DFd0
0.1 0.3 1.1 29.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 34.1 0 1 0 2 1498 1500 c0t5000C500599DD97Fd0
0.0 0.6 0.3 75.6 0.0 0.0 22.6 71.4 0 1 0 0 677 677 c0t5000C500420C51BFd0
0.0 0.6 0.3 74.8 0.0 0.1 28.6 83.8 1 1 0 0 876 876 c0t5000C5004210A64Fd0
0.6 43.8 18.4 96.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0 1 0 5 154 159 c0t5000C500420CE4AFd0
Mar 12 2013 17:03:34.645205745 ereport.fs.zfs.io
nvlist version: 0
     class = ereport.fs.zfs.io
     ena = 0x114ff5c491a00c01
     detector = (embedded nvlist)
     nvlist version: 0
          version = 0x0
          scheme = zfs
          pool = 0x53f64e2baa9805c9
          vdev = 0x125ce3ac57ffb535
     (end detector)
     pool = SATA_Pool
     pool_guid = 0x53f64e2baa9805c9
     pool_context = 0
     pool_failmode = wait
     vdev_guid = 0x125ce3ac57ffb535
     vdev_type = disk
     vdev_path = /dev/dsk/c0t5000C500599DD97Fd0s0
     vdev_devid = id1,sd@n5000c500599dd97f/a
     parent_guid = 0xcf0109972ceae52c
     parent_type = mirror
     zio_err = 5
     zio_offset = 0x1d500000
     zio_size = 0xf1000
     zio_objset = 0x12
     zio_object = 0x0
     zio_level = -2
     zio_blkid = 0x452
     __ttl = 0x1
     __tod = 0x513fa636 0x26750ef1
I know all of these drives are not bad and I have confirmed they are all running the latest firmware and correct sector size, 512 (ashift 9). I am thinking it is some sort of compatibility with this new HBA but have no way of verifying. Anyone have any suggestions?
Edited by: 991704 on Mar 12, 2013 12:45 PM

There must be something small I am missing. We have another system configured nearly the same (same server and HBA, different drives) and it functions. I've gone through the recommended storage practices guide. The only item I have not been able to verify is
"Confirm that your controller honors cache flush commands so that you know your data is safely written, which is important before changing the pool's devices or splitting a mirrored storage pool. This is generally not a problem on Oracle/Sun hardware, but it is good practice to confirm that your hardware's cache flushing setting is enabled."
How can I confirm this? As far as I know these HBAs are simply HBAs. No battery backup. No on-board memory. The 9207 doesn't even offer RAID.
Edited by: 991704 on Mar 15, 2013 12:33 PM

Create ZONE in ZFS pool solaris10

Hi Gurus,
I'm reading some solaris 10 tutorials about ZFS and Zones. Is it possible to create a new storage pool using my current hard disk in which I installed solaris???
I'm a bit new in Solaris, I have a SPARC box in which I'm learnin about solaris 10. I have installed Solaris 10 using ZFS file system. I think my box only have 1 disk but not sure. I see 46 GB of free space running "df -kh " command
I run "format" command, this is the output
root@orclidm # format
Searching for disks...done
AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
0. c0t0d0 <SUN72G cyl 14087 alt 2 hd 24 sec 424>
/pci@780/pci@0/pci@9/scsi@0/sd@0,0
1. c0t1d0 <SUN72G cyl 14087 alt 2 hd 24 sec 424>
/pci@780/pci@0/pci@9/scsi@0/sd@1,0
Specify disk (enter its number):
zpool list "display this:"
root@orclidm # zpool list
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP HEALTH ALTROOT
rpool 68G 13.1G 54.9G 19% ONLINE -
zfs list "display this:"
root@orclidm # zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
rpool 21.3G 45.6G 106K /rpool
rpool/ROOT 11.6G 45.6G 31K legacy
rpool/ROOT/s10s_u10wos_17b 11.6G 45.6G 11.6G /
rpool/dump 1.50G 45.6G 1.50G -
rpool/export 66K 45.6G 32K /export
rpool/export/home 34K 45.6G 34K /export/home
rpool/swap 8.25G 53.9G 16K -
I read in a tutorial that when you create a zpool you need to specify an empty hard disk, is that correct?
Please point me on the best approach to create zones using zfs pools.
Regards

manin21 wrote:
Hi Gurus,
I'm reading some solaris 10 tutorials about ZFS and Zones. Is it possible to create a new storage pool using my current hard disk in which I installed solaris???IF you have a spare partition you may use that.
>
I'm a bit new in Solaris, I have a SPARC box in which I'm learnin about solaris 10. I have installed Solaris 10 using ZFS file system. I think my box only have 1 disk but not sure. I see 46 GB of free space running "df -kh " command
I run "format" command, this is the output
root@orclidm # format
Searching for disks...done
AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
0. c0t0d0 <SUN72G cyl 14087 alt 2 hd 24 sec 424>
/pci@780/pci@0/pci@9/scsi@0/sd@0,0
1. c0t1d0 <SUN72G cyl 14087 alt 2 hd 24 sec 424>
/pci@780/pci@0/pci@9/scsi@0/sd@1,0
Specify disk (enter its number):
This shows two disks. In a production setup you might mirror this.
zpool list "display this:"
root@orclidm # zpool list
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP HEALTH ALTROOT
rpool 68G 13.1G 54.9G 19% ONLINE -
The command:
zpool status
would show you what devices you are using
zfs list "display this:"
root@orclidm # zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
rpool 21.3G 45.6G 106K /rpool
rpool/ROOT 11.6G 45.6G 31K legacy
rpool/ROOT/s10s_u10wos_17b 11.6G 45.6G 11.6G /
rpool/dump 1.50G 45.6G 1.50G -
rpool/export 66K 45.6G 32K /export
rpool/export/home 34K 45.6G 34K /export/home
rpool/swap 8.25G 53.9G 16K -
I read in a tutorial that when you create a zpool you need to specify an empty hard disk, is that correct?
No.
You can use partions/slices instead. A zone storage pool is composed of one or more devices; each device can be a a whole disk, disk slice or even a file if i remember correctly ( .... but you really dont want to use a file normally).
Please point me on the best approach to create zones using zfs pools.
RegardsYour storage rpool is 68GB in size on a 72GB disk .... therefore the disk is full up and their is no space for another zfs pool. If zpool status shows your disk is mirrored by zfs that is that. Otherwise you may choose to create a storage pool on the other disk (not best production practice).
often one creates a zfs filesystem out of an existing filesystem.
zfs create -o mountpoint=/zones rpool/zones
zfs create rpool/zones/myzone
Then use zonepath=/zones/myzone creating the zone.
- I was googling to cross check my answer ... the following blog has an example but it is a little old and may be opensolaris orientated.
https://blogs.oracle.com/DanX/entry/solaris_zfs_and_zones_simple
Authorative information is at http://docs.oracle.com, notably:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23823_01/index.html
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23823_01/html/819-5461/index.html
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E18752_01/html/817-1592/index.html

Replace FC Card and ZFS Pools

I have to replace a Qlogic ISP2200 dual port Fibre Channel card with a new card in a V480 server. I have 2 ZFS Pools that mount via that card. Would I have to export and import the ZFS pools when replacing the card? I've read you have to when moving the pools to a different server.
Naturally the World Wide Number (WWN) would be different on the new FC card and other than changing my SAN switch zone information I'm not sure how ZFS would deal with this situation. The storage itself would not change.
Any ideas are welcome.
Running Solaris 10 (11/06) with kernel patch 125100-07
Thanks,
Chris

I have to replace a Qlogic ISP2200 dual port Fibre Channel card with a new card in a V480 server. I have 2 ZFS Pools that mount via that card. Would I have to export and import the ZFS pools when replacing the card? I've read you have to when moving the pools to a different server.
Naturally the World Wide Number (WWN) would be different on the new FC card and other than changing my SAN switch zone information I'm not sure how ZFS would deal with this situation. The storage itself would not change.
Any ideas are welcome.
Running Solaris 10 (11/06) with kernel patch 125100-07
Thanks,
Chris

IFS-10620: Unable to construct connection pool

Hi,
I obtain IFS-10620 error running java application. Acording with Developer Guide this error ocurrs when they are problems in the connection because TNS, ifs service or user/password problems. I verified this topics and i don't detect any problem.
Somebody have any idea?
Thanks,
FABIAN.
null

Hi Mark!, my java code is the next:
import java.lang.Object;
import java.lang.Exception;
import oracle.ifs.common.IfsException;
import oracle.ifs.beans.Document;
import oracle.ifs.common.IfsException;
import oracle.ifs.beans.DirectoryUser;
import oracle.ifs.common.IfsException;
import oracle.ifs.beans.PrimaryUserProfile;
import oracle.ifs.common.IfsException;
import oracle.ifs.beans.Folder;
import oracle.ifs.beans.DocumentDefinition;
import oracle.ifs.beans.LibraryObject;
import oracle.ifs.beans.LibraryService;
import oracle.ifs.beans.LibrarySession;
import oracle.ifs.common.CleartextCredential;
import oracle.ifs.common.ConnectOptions;
import oracle.ifs.common.AttributeValue;
import oracle.ifs.beans.Selector;
import oracle.ifs.beans.FolderPathResolver;
class HelloWorld {
public static void main(String args[]) throws IfsException
//Connect to the repository.
LibraryService ifsService = new LibraryService();
CleartextCredential me = new CleartextCredential("user", "pass");
ConnectOptions connectOpts = new ConnectOptions();
connectOpts.setServiceName("ServerManager");
connectOpts.setServicePassword("ifspass");
LibrarySession ifsSession = ifsService.connect(me,connectOpts);
//Create a new DocumentDefinition and a new Document.
DocumentDefinition newDocDef = new DocumentDefinition(ifsSession);
newDocDef.setAttribute("NAME", AttributeValue.newAttributeValue
("Hello_World.txt"));
newDocDef.setContent("Hello World");
Document doc = (Document) ifsSession.createPublicObject(newDocDef);
//Obtain the users home folder and add the new Document to it.
DirectoryUser thisUser = ifsSession.getDirectoryUser();
PrimaryUserProfile userProfile = ifsSession.getPrimaryUserProfile(thisUser);
Folder homeFolder = userProfile.getHomeFolder();
homeFolder.addItem(doc);
//Disconnect from the repository.
ifsSession.disconnect();
This code compile fine but the error to execute it is the next:
IFS-10620: Unable to construct connection pool
at oracle.ifs.server.LibraryConnection.<init>(LibraryConnection.java:227
at oracle.ifs.server.ConnectionPool.createLibraryConnection(ConnectionPo
ol.java:576)
at oracle.ifs.server.ConnectionPool.<init>(Compiled Code)
at oracle.ifs.server.S_LibraryService.<init>(Compiled Code)
at oracle.ifs.server.S_LibraryService.startService(S_LibraryService.java
:1129)
at oracle.ifs.beans.LibraryService.connectLocal(LibraryService.java:408)
at oracle.ifs.beans.LibraryService.connect(LibraryService.java:280)
at HelloWorld.main(HelloWorld.java:34)
What's the problem?
Thanks for your help.
null

IFS-10620: Unable to construct connection pool exception

I am getting the "IFS-10620: Unable to construct connection pool" exception on the browser
when I try to run the Airport example from the "Writing an iFS Custom Renderer" http://technet.oracle.com/products/ifs/htdocs/xsl/index.htm
technical brief.
Technet tells me that in this case I should (a) run it under jdk 1.1.8, and
(b) have classes111.zip from the jdbc directory included in the classpath.
(c) DatabaseUrl field in IfsDefault.properties is defined properly.
I have modified one of the classes to output the relevant system parameters when
initialised, and I get the enclosed output in (a) on loading the servlet.
Together with paths (b) and classpath(c) settings,it seems that the requirements
are met but it still gives the error. Any suggestions of where we go wrong?
Oracle, IFS and JWS are installed on the same NT machine, and the iFS GUI works.
The value of the DatabaseUrl field was empty (juts "@", I then changed it to
"@machinename" but to no avail).
Thanks
Nikolay Mehandjiev
[email protected]
Enclosures
(a) output from the modified servlet on loading
javawebserver: java.version is 1.1.8
javawebserver: java.class.version is 45.3
javawebserver: java-vm.version is null
javawebserver: java.class.path is \Oracle\Ora81\ifs\settings;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\j
re\lib\rt.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\jre\lib\i18n.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\jdbc\lib\classes1
11.zip;\Oracle\Ora81\lib\vbjorb.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\jlib\xmlparserv2.jar;\Oracle\O
ra81\ifs\lib\repos.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\lib\adk.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\lib\email
.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\lib\tools.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\lib\utils.jar;\Oracle\Ora
81\ifs\lib\release.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\assistants\jlib\jnls.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\
custom_classes;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\webui_classes;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\lib\http.jar;\O
racle\Ora81\ifs\lib\webui.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\lib\clientlib.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\
ifs\jws\lib\servlet.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\jws\lib\jst.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\jre\
lib\javac.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\settings;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\jre\lib\rt.jar;\Oracl
e\Ora81\ifs\jre\lib\i18n.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\jdbc\lib\classes111.zip;\Oracle\Ora81
\lib\vbjorb.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\jlib\xmlparserv2.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\lib\repos.j
ar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\lib\adk.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\lib\email.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\i
fs\lib\tools.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\lib\utils.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\lib\release.j
ar;\Oracle\Ora81\assistants\jlib\jnls.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\custom_classes;\Orac
le\Ora81\ifs\webui_classes;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\lib\http.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\lib\
webui.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\lib\clientlib.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\jws\lib\servlet.
jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\jws\lib\jst.jar;\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\jre\lib\javac.jar;C:\Ora
cle\Ora81\ifs\jre\lib\rt.jar;C:\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\jre\lib\i18n.jar;C:\Oracle\Ora8
1\ifs\jre\lib\classes.zip;C:\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\jre\classes
javawebserver: java.library.path is null
(b) Path values
C:\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\bin>set PATH
Path="C:\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\bin";C:\Oracle\Ora81\bin;C:\jdk1.1.8\bin;C:\WINNT\syst
em32;C:\WINNT;C:\WINNT\system32\nls\ENGLISH;C:\WINNT\system32\nls;C:\Oracle\Ora8
1\orb\bin
PATHEXT=.COM;.EXE;.BAT;.CMD;.VBS;.VBE;.JS;.JSE;.WSF;.WSH
(c) Classpath values
C:\Oracle\Ora81\ifs\bin>set CLASSPATH
CLASSPATH=Files\Exceed.nt\hcljrcsv.jar;C:\Oracle\Ora81\orb\classes\yoj.jar;C:\Or
acle\Ora81\orb\classes\share.zip;C:\Oracle\Ora81\jdbc\lib\classes111.zip
null

I have the same error when I try to connect from another machine to iFS.
oracle.ifs.common.IfsException: IFS-10620: Unable to construct connection pool
oracle.ifs.common.IfsException: IFS-10633: Unable to create library connection
oracle.ifs.common.IfsException: IFS-10600: Unable to construct library connectio
n
iFS API is working only with jdk1.1.8 ?
I'm just using your API and I can assure you that IfsDefault.properties is as you advice and inluded in classpath.
Please reply if you have any solution to this
Thank you verry much

Unable to create connection pooling

hello everyone,
i am trying to implement connection pooling with sybase as the database and tomcat 5 as the container. But this is the exception thats coming :
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name jdbc/TestDB2 is not bound in
this Context
My server.xml looks lilke this :
     <Context path="/DBTest2" docBase="DBTest2" debug="5" reloadable="true" crossContext="true" >
     <Logger classname="org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger"
          prefix="localhost_DBTest2_log." suffix=".txt" timestamp="true" />
     <Resource name="jdbc/TestDB2" auth="Container" type="javax.sql.DataSource" />
     <ResourceParams name="jdbc/TestDB2">
          <parameter>
          <name>factory</name>
          <value>org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory</value>
          </parameter>
          <parameter>
          <name>maxActive</name>
          <value>100</value>
          </parameter>
          <parameter>
          <name>maxIdle</name>
          <value>30</value>
          </parameter>
          <parameter>
          <name>maxWait</name>
          <value>10000</value>
          </parameter>
          <parameter>
          <name>username</name>
          <value>sa</value>
          </parameter>
          <parameter>
          <name>password</name>
          <value></value>
          </parameter>
          <parameter>
          <name>driverClassName</name>
          <value>com.sybase.jdbc2.jdbc.SybDriver</value>
          </parameter>
          <parameter>
          <name>url</name>
          <value>jdbc:sybase:Tds:172.16.12.84:2048/lnk_common_dd</value>
          </parameter>
     </ResourceParams>
     </Context>
This is my web.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE web-app
PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN"
"http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd">
<web-app xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd"
version="2.4">
<description>MySQL Test App</description>
<resource-ref>
<description>DB Connection</description>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/TestDB2</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
<res-auth>Container</res-auth>
</resource-ref>
</web-app>
this is my test.jsp
<%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/sql" prefix="sql" %>
<%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core" prefix="c" %>
<sql:query var="rs" dataSource="jdbc/TestDB2">
select id, foo, bar from testdata
</sql:query>
<html>
<head>
<title>DB Test</title>
</head>
<body>
<h2>Results</h2>
<c:forEach var="row" items="${rs.rows}">
Foo ${row.foo}
Bar ${row.bar}
</c:forEach>
</body>
</html>
Any help would be much appreciated as i am stuck with this since the last 2 days
thanking you all in advance
Bhavani

Hi Karthikeyan,
This is not the issue at all. I can open the management studio by the same login id and password and also i can make the database jdbc connection from plain java file.
It does not give me any problem by them.
I'm unable to find the actual problem. May be i'm missing something in connection pooling.
Please help.
Regards
Mina

Can't get ZFS Pool to validate in HAStoragePlus

Hello.
We rebuilt our cluster with Solaris 10 U6 with Sun Cluster 3.2 U1.
When I was running U5, we never had this issue, but with U6, I can't get the system to validate properly the zpool resource to the resource group.
I am running the following commands:
zpool create -f tank raidz2 c2t0d0 c2t1d0 c2t2d0 c2t3d0 c3t0d0 c3t1d0 c3t2d0 c3t3d0 spare c2t4d0
zfs set mountpoint=/share tank
These commands build my zpool, zpool status comes back good.
I then run
clresource create -g tank_rg -t SUNW.HAStoragePlus -p Zpools=tank hastorage_rs
I get the following output:
clresource: mbfilestor1 - : no error
clresource: (C189917) VALIDATE on resource storage_rs, resource group tank_rg, exited with non-zero exit status.
clresource: (C720144) Validation of resource storage_rs in resource group tank_rg on node mbfilestor1 failed.
clresource: (C891200) Dec 2 10:27:00 mbfilestor1 SC[SUNW.HAStoragePlus:6,tank_rg,storage_rs,hastorageplus_validate]: : no error
Dec 2 10:27:00 mbfilestor1 Cluster.RGM.rgmd: VALIDATE failed on resource <storage_rs>, resource group <tank_rg>, time used: 0% of timeout <1800, seconds>
Failed to create resource "storage_rs".
My resource group and logical host all work no problems, and when I ran this command on the older version of Solaris, it worked no problem. Is this a problem with the newer version of Solaris only?
I though maybe downloading the most up to date patches would fix this, but it didn't.
I did notice this in my messages:
Dec 2 10:26:58 mbfilestor1 Cluster.RGM.rgmd: [ID 224900 daemon.notice] launching method <hastorageplus_validate> for resource <storage_rs>, resource group <tank_rg>, node <mbfilestor1>, timeout <1800> seconds
Dec 2 10:26:58 mbfilestor1 Cluster.RGM.rgmd: [ID 616562 daemon.notice] 9 fe_rpc_command: cmd_type(enum):<1>:cmd=</usr/cluster/lib/rgm/rt/hastorageplus/hastorageplus_validate>:tag=<tank_rg.storage_rs.2>: Calling security_clnt_connect(..., host=<mbfilestor1>, sec_type {0:WEAK, 1:STRONG, 2:DES} =<1>, ...)
Dec 2 10:27:00 mbfilestor1 SC[SUNW.HAStoragePlus:6,tank_rg,storage_rs,hastorageplus_validate]: [ID 471757 daemon.error] : no error
Dec 2 10:27:00 mbfilestor1 Cluster.RGM.rgmd: [ID 699104 daemon.error] VALIDATE failed on resource <storage_rs>, resource group <tank_rg>, time used: 0% of timeout <1800, seconds>
Any ideas, or should I put in a bug fix request with Sun?

Hi,
Thanks, I ended up just going back to Solaris 10 U5. It was too critical to get back up and running, and I got tired of messing with it, so I ended up going back. Everything is working like it should. I may try to do a LU on the server and see what happens. Maybe the pools and cluster resources will be fine.
Edited by: mbunixadm on Dec 15, 2008 9:09 AM

Unable to destroy ZFS pool

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for