Unable to include a table in a Physical Model Diagram via the RON

Hi,
In Designer 10g I am unable to include a table in a Physical Model Diagram (Edit > Include) if I open the diagram via the RON, but it works if the diagram is opened via the Design Editor.
I found Doc ID268944.999 on Metalink which seems to detail the same problem, but no solution. So does this only work via the Design Editor now?
Thanks,
Antony

I tried to find the item on Metalink but could not find it.
I have never tried to move tables in the RON to an SMD.
Of course I do not know why you would want to do that. The DE does it so nicly.
What error message are you getting?
Tell me exactly what your doing and I will try it here.

Similar Messages

Unable to include VARI table in "Tables Excluded from REORG" No Edit options

I am trying to remove the table VARI from the automatic reorg in the dbacockpit.
Steps followed :
-> Configuration
-> Automatic Maintenance
-> Automatic REORG
-> Tables Excluded from REORG
Issue : Unable to include VARI table in "Tables Excluded from REORG" No Edit options .

Hello Arun,
Automatic reorg of the tables/indexes is done on the basis of result provided by script REORGCHK which runs on regular basis to analyse the table with huge growth and more fragmented blocks.
Since the default filter for reorg is set to size' 1,000,000 KB', table which has bigger size than the default value, needs to be reorganized as per the standard configuration.
To exclude table VARI, modify the filter clause, and update the policy using procedure Automaint_set_policyfile(). You then can verify again using automaint_get_policyfile(). The procedures are documented in the IBM DB2 InfoCentre. If you need assistance, please let me know.
I suggest to take the exported policy, and just add table VARI in the filter clause. The section could read as follows.
========================================================================
<FilterClause>TABSCHEMA NOT LIKE 'SYS%' AND (TABSCHEMA, TABNAME) NOT IN
(SELECT TABSCHEMA, TABNAME FROM SYSCAT.EVENTTABLES) AND (TABNAME <>
'VARI')</FilterClause>
========================================================================
Then apply this policy, and check results.
Please provide feedback.
Best Regards,
Gunjan

Unable to form af:table in navigation Menu Model

Hi,
Am using jdeveloper 11.1.2.1.0,
I have developed my project with reference to the link below
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cInX_FMZJaQ
Am unable to drag and drop a VO as af:table in my jspx pages.
Could any one pls explain me where i went wrong?

It is not possible to drop VO directly from the model into pages. On JDeveloper, go to the Data controls view of the Applications Navigator tab, click on the refresh icon, select your application module and then then the VO instance you want to drag and drop. I'm just guessing what you could be doing wrong. Describe what steps you did. Also make sure, if you use a template, that you have declared facets and referenced the facet where you want to create the table in a container that allows tables.
Edited by: Paulo Moniz on Oct 27, 2012 8:03 PM

Table properties doesn't propagate from Relational Model to physical model

Hi all,
I have a relationnal model with several tables and several schema.
When i create a new table in the relational model with a specified schema, the table is created on the physicla model, but the schema is not prapagate.
Is there a way to do this automatically ?
Or do i have to specify the schema on the relationnal and on the physical.
Thank you

Hi,
schema object in relational model needs to be implemented in physical model - user is the implementation of schema in Oracle physical model. User has property "implements schema". You also can omit this redirection and can assign directly user to table but in this case you'll lose the flexibility.
Here is how DDL is impacted using different option (schema_1 and table_1 in relational model):
1) physical model is not open - no implementation details
CREATE TABLE Schema_1.TABLE_1
     Column_1 NUMBER
;2) physical model is open - Schema_1 is not implemented
CREATE TABLE TABLE_1
     Column_1 NUMBER
    ) LOGGING
;3) physical model is open - Schema_1 is implemented by User1
CREATE TABLE User1.TABLE_1
     Column_1 NUMBER
    ) LOGGING
;4) physical model is open - Schema_1 is implemented by User1; Table_1 is directly assigned to User2 in physical model
CREATE TABLE User2.TABLE_1
     Column_1 NUMBER
    ) LOGGING
;Philip

Include customer tables : TDMS HCM

Hi,
I'm using the PA & PD Scnerario. I would like to include client table "HRP9508". But when I execute the activity "Transfer Selection Criteria" I've the next warning "Table HRP9508 is not registered as being released".
To include this table I execute the next activities in the DEV system and transport to PRD system :
Define Customer Table Transfer,
Define Tables for Customer Table
Transfer and Table Transfer Status.
But after do that, the warning shows again.
Anybody had tried to include customer tables with TDMS & HCM (because I think the process to do it with TDMS and ECC is different).
Thank's in advanced

Hi,
just for information. You said that you had maintained the following:
Define Customer Table Transfer,
Define Tables for Customer Table
Transfer and Table Transfer Status.
For your self-defined infotypes you need only maintain the last table. This is described in the documentation though........
Regards, Gerard.

Logical and Physical Models

Hi All,
I'm new to Designer. I need to produce a logical data model in Oracle Designer 10g. I have created a few tables in the RON and have used Design Editor to add these to a Server Model. I think this is giving me the physical model rather than the logical model.
Can you please tell me if I'm going about this the wrong way ? I need the logical model to confirm with the non-technical people before I produce the physical model for the techies.
Thanks

Billy wrote:
Hi,
John - yes I have already checked all this, all looks ok. Also, I'm only using the REPOS_MANAGER account for now so permissions should not be an issue.
Mark - when you say create an entity in the RON, I can create tables, how would I create an entity in the RON ? I can go to Diagrams in the RON and see my ERD.
When I installed the repository I do remember having to go to the SYS account to grant an execute on a package to the REPOS_MANAGER user because one of the REPOS_MANAGER packages required it.
Any direction would be appreciated ?
Thanks
BillyAh, but that IS the issue. You shouldn't use the repository owner account for your day to day work. Create another Oracle user and grant it privileges through the RAU. Then connect as that user to work in Designer. Oddly enough, the repository owner doesn't have the privileges that it needs - the privileges are stored in the repository, not database privileges.

Physical model disabled

I'm trying to create a Partition using sql developer/modeler
my physical model all the options or disabled(greyed out) when it is connected to live database how do I over come this

Hi,
You need to open the Physical Model properties dialog for the Table (from the Physical model part of the Browser tree) and set the Partitioned property (on its General tab) to YES.
You will then be able to use the Partitioning tab in this dialog, to set Partitioning type and other Partitioning properties.
Also, after you've closed this dialog, you can create Partition instances by selecting New from the right-click menu for the Partitions node (subordinate to the Table's node in the Physical model part of the tree).
David

Physical Model - Primary Key changed

I have a report called 'Service Report' running fine. This report uses multiple tables like Service,Specification etc...
Now that the primary key of service table has changed from 'jdoid' to 'entityId' (The primary key of all the other tables also have changed).
Wondering what is the best way to rewrite this report?
Do I have to import 'Service' table (and all other tables) and redefine physical model,business model and presentation model from scratch?
Is there any other strategy that anybody could think of?
Appreciate your help.
Thanks
Kavi

No you don't need to re-import. You can edit manually in the Admin tool - start with the physical layer, then the BMM layer.
Depending on the columns and how the report is built you might not need to edit the report at all.

Data modeler, physical model related view

Hi community,
is there a way to create a physical model related view in the data modeler or a better idea?
The reason is simple, let me say, I have a view with string concatenation and want use this view in oracle and sql server, the syntax is different.
In Oracle it is " column1 || ' ' || column2". The same thing in sql is "column1 + ' ' + column2"
Regards, Henrik

Hi Kent,
thank you for the answer, but it is not really a solution for me to copy the complete relational model to a second one! It is unfavorable for later changes on the model. You must do them all changes on both models.
Currently I have one relational model together with four physical models, Oracle 10, Oracle 11, Oracle 12 and MS Sql. If I work with stored functions, procedures, packages, triggers and so one, it is possible to change the content of these objects in the physical model, depending of the sql language and the database version features.
Only tables and views are not changeable and I’m not able to add a table or view to the physical model.
Other suggestions?
Regards, Henrik

Data modeling tool: physical model migration

Hi,
I have imported my relational model with a generated physical model for oracle 9i.
I'd like to migrate my DB to oracle 10g, but I don't feel like creating a new physical model for Oracle 10g from the scratch and configuring it all.
Is there any way to copy that oracle 9i physical model into an oracle 10g model? I know there could be any implementation change from 9i to 10g, but at least copy the main 99% (and warn about the 1% impossible to replicate in 10g).
Could this feature be taken into the production version?
By the way, is this a BUG? when I start the tool, my oracle 9i physical model is not shown in the tree, and I've to right-click over physical model, press open, and then select oracle 9i, to be shown in the tree. But I close the data modeling tool, and when I start again, there is no physical model shown in the tree :(
thanks a lot in advance, I'm evaluating the tool.

Thank you very much for your reply, and hearing those news makes me very happy, because I'm evaluating the product and I miss some functionality like that.
By the way, where can I find the new functionality or the fixed one that is going to be on the production release? Or could yo send it to me by email or any other way? I'm very interested in it.

Unable to create datawarehouse tables using DAC client

Hi,
We are facing error while creating data warehouse tables in DAC Client.
Please find the below mentioned error message
=====================================
STD OUTPUT
=====================================
CREATING SIEBEL DATABASE OBJECTS
F:\DAC\bifoundation\dac\UTILITIES\BIN\DDLIMP /I N /s N /u infdomain /p ******* /c DB_DAC /G "SSE_ROLE" /f F:\DAC\bifoundation\dac/conf/sqlgen/ctl-file/oracle_bi_dw.ctl /b "" /K "" /X "" /W N
Error while importing Siebel database schema.
=====================================
ERROR OUTPUT
=====================================
Siebel Enterprise Applications ODBC DDL Import Utility, Version 7.7 [18030] ENU
Copyright (c) 2001 Siebel Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
This software is the property of Siebel Systems, Inc., 2207 Bridgepointe Parkway,
San Mateo, CA 94404.
User agrees that any use of this software is governed by: (1) the applicable
user limitations and other terms and conditions of the license agreement which
has been entered into with Siebel Systems or its authorized distributors; and
(2) the proprietary and restricted rights notices included in this software.
WARNING: THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM IS PROTECTED BY U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL LAW.
UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION OR USE OF THIS PROGRAM, OR ANY PORTION
OF IT, MAY RESULT IN SEVERE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PENALTIES, AND WILL BE
PROSECUTED TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE UNDER THE LAW.
If you have received this software in error, please notify Siebel Systems
immediately at (650) 295-5000.
F:\DAC\bifoundation\dac\UTILITIES\BIN\DDLIMP /I N /s N /u infdomain /p ***** /c DB_DAC /G SSE_ROLE /f F:\DAC\bifoundation\dac/conf/sqlgen/ctl-file/oracle_bi_dw.ctl /b /K /X /W N
Connecting to the database...
Unable to connect to the database...
I have established ODBC connection using Oracle client driver and able to connect with the oracle server.
Oracle DB & client Version : 11.2.0.2- 64 bit
DAC Version : 10.1.3.4.1
Informatica version : 9.0.1
OBIA : 7.9.6.3
Can someone please help me to resolve this issue?
Thanks,
Prasanna

The 64 bit odbc (odbcad.exe) which is in system32 folder contains oracle client 11g driver
But in 32 bit odbc(odbcad.exe) which is in syswow64, I am not able to see the oracle client 11g driver.Instead Oracle Merant ODBC Driver in DAC 10g_Oracle OH888717393 is there
When we try to establish connection with this driver, it is throwing following error
Specified driver could not be loaded due to system error 193:
*(Oracle Merant ODBC Driver in DAC 10g_Oracle OH888717393,*
F:\DAC\bifoundation\dac\utilities\DataDirectODBC\seor820.dll).
Can you please explain how to create dsn in 32 bit odbc also for oracle client?
Thanks,
Prasanna

How to specify COMPRESS FOR OLTP on a table in physical model?

Hi,
we have licensed Oracle's Advanced Compression and want to use the OLTP compression on some tables. I am looking for a way to specify COMPRESS FOR OLTP on a table in the physical model. So far, I can only set "Data Compression" to YES or NO.
Are you going to add the "new" compression modes in the next release?
Thanks,
Frank
Version of SQL Developer Data Modeler is 3.1.3.709

Hi Frank,
Are you going to add the "new" compression modes in the next release?There is support for compression type (including OLTP) in DM 3.3 EA and you can download it from OTN.
Philip

Physical attributes for index on temp tables (using physical model)

I need create index on temp tables.
When I generate DDL, it includes physical attributes like ‘LOGGING NOCOMPRESS NOPARALLEL’.
I get error "ORA – 14451 (unsupported feature w/temporary tables)"
I’ve to use physical model in OSDM. How do I get rid of physical attributes in DDL for index?

Hi,
Thanks for reporting this problem.
You can remove the LOGGING clause by opening the Properties dialog for the Index in the Physical model and setting its Logging property to the blank option.
However it's not possible to suppress the NOCOMPRESS and NOPARALLEL at the moment.
I've logged a bug on this.
As a workaround, you could do a global edit on the DDL file to remove all instances of NOCOMPRESS and NOPARALLEL.
David

Expand the Warehouse tables X adding physical tables and joins

I was questioned about these options:
a) Add physical tables (from other DBs) and modifying the physical model with new joins + modifying logical model to include new columns
b) Expand warehouse tables to include new columns in the tables. Doing a complementar ETL in order to feed the additional columns with data. Logical model would be updated but the idea in this option is to avoid joins in the physical layer.
My understanding is that option a) despite the joins in the physical layer would be a better strategy.
Pls. I'd appreciate any comments on the performance side or in the amount of effort to create the complementar ETL...
Txs.
Antonio

Hi Lombo,
I am not sure about what you mean with option a. In my understanding, you are asking for a comparison between:
a) adding data from an additional source in the RPD:
This means that you have to create an additional data source in the physical layer. I do not think you can create relations between physical tables sourced from different data sources in your physical layer. This means that the data is related in the logical layer. By doing this, the BI Server has to join the data from both sources for each front-end request. Also, it will have to perform the last aggregations instead of shipping it to the database. This is a big performance hit in terms of response time.
However! It can be much and much faster in terms of development effort required to support this. If it's only a limited number of columns and tables being added, this may be a valid option. You can also use this approach to prototype option b.
b) adding data from an additional source using ETL:
Quite some work in terms of development effort. However, all complexity and performance hits are moved to the bottom of the stack and process: database and ETL. You will need to create an additional data source in the DAC, additional custom folder(s) in Informatica and the ETL logic to update the existing tables and/or load new tables.
Additionaly, you need to expand the RPD with the new columns / tables, just as you would do in option a. However, now it will be sourced from the same datasource: less work for the BI Server to deliver the dataset to satisfy the request.
So basically, I would consider:
- How does the system currently perform: response times in the front end ( bad -> go for option b )
- How many columns will be added and how often will they be used in the front-end
- Informatica / DAC / OBI expertise available
- How long do you have to facilitate reporting on data from the 2nd source
Good luck!

VLD-1119: Unable to generate Multi-table Insert statement for some or all t

Hi All -
I have a map in OWB 10.2.0.4 which is ending with following error: -
VLD-1119: Unable to generate Multi-table Insert statement for some or all targets.*
Multi-table insert statement cannot be generated for some or all of the targets due to upstream graphs of those targets are not identical on "active operators" such as "join".*
The map is created with following logic in mind. Let me know if you need more info. Any directions are highly appreciated and many thanks for your inputs in advance: -
I have two source tables say T1 and T2. There are full outer joined in a joiner and output of this joined is passed to an expression to evaluate values of columns based on
business logic i.e. If T1 is available than take T1.C1 else take T2.C1 so on.
A flag is also evaluated in the expression because these intermediate results needs to be joined to third source table say T3 with different condition.
Based on value taken a flag is being set in the expression which is used in a splitter to get results in three intermediate tables based on flag value evaluated earlier.
These three intermediate tables are all truncate insert and these are unioned to fill a final target table.
Visually it is something like this: -
T1 -- T3 -- JOINER1
| -->Join1 (FULL OUTER) --> Expression -->SPLITTER -- JOINER2 UNION --> Target Table
| JOINER3
T2 --
Please suggest.

I verified that their is a limitation with the splitter operator which will not let you generate a multi split having more than 999 columns in all.
I had to use two separate splitters to achieve what I was trying to do.
So the situation is now: -
Siource -> Split -> Split 1 -> Insert into table -> Union1---------Final tableA
Siource -> Split -> Split 2 -> Insert into table -> Union1

Unable to include a table in a Physical Model Diagram via the RON

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for