Unmanaged switch with CDP?

I am trying to find an unmanaged cisco switch that has cdp.  Technically the switch doesn't have to be unmanaged, but I am looking for a cheep switch with only 5-10 ports that also has cdp.  I can't be sure if the small cisco SD series switches, formerly s***sys, have cdp now or not.

Brannor:
E.g. switch (testString.hashCode()) {
case ("case 1".hashCode())...This won't work. You need a constant expressions for the cases, a method like hashCode() won't work there.
Yogee:
1. Different Strings are not guaranteed to generate different hashcodes.True, but its such a unlikely event that the strings' hashcodes will be equal that someone would still be able to do this reasonably in some situations. but I wouldn't do this in my code
2. The algorithm used to generate the hashcode is not guaranteed to be the same on different platforms.There is a String hashcode formula, and its not ambiguous. The method is implemented entirely in java and so it will be the same on different platforms. Object.hashCode() though can be different on different platforms.
3. The algorithm used to generate the hashcode is not guaranteed to be the same on different
java versions.We can use that argument against writing anything in the API though, since the language can always change. Has Sun ever indicated that they might want to change the API specs for Strings's hashCode?

Similar Messages

  • How do I configure Time Capsule to work with 8 port unmanaged switch?

    This is what I want to end up with.
    cable modem
    Time Capsule
                                                            wireless network           8 port unmanaged switch TRENDnet TEGS80G
                                                                                                  entertainment center(TV, xbox 360, dvd, apple tv, ect...)
    I have been using the above setup with an E3000 router in place of the time capsule without any problems, and was expecting to just be able to switch out the E3000 for the time capsule and keep right on rolling. At the moment, without the switch plugged in, using the time capsule as a stand alone wireless router, everything works as intended. However, I don't want to have every device in the house pulling off of wireless. Whenever I plug my switch in I lose internet connectivity. I assume this is because both the switch and the Time Capsule are trying to direct traffic and creating a conflict. I have attempted to disable the NAT in the Airport Utility and this is what happens.
    Where do I go from here, or am I heading in completely the wrong direction?

    Unfortunately, you are on the wrong track, heading in the wrong direction at the moment.
    We need to learn whether you have a simple modem or a modem/router.
    This will determine whether the Time Capsule is to be configured in router mode to provide DHCP and NAT services for the network......or if your "modem" is already doing this.....the Time Capsule needs to be configured in Bridge Mode.
    So, I suggest that you disconnect the switch from the Time Capsule for now, and power everything off except the modem, Time Capsule and the computer you are using to configure the Time Capsule, and get things working correctly first. Then, devices can be added one at a time to verify proper operation.
    If this seems to make sense to you, and you want to move forward, please post back with the make and model number of your cable modem.

  • Does 6509 switch support CDP bypass feature when interface configured with IEEE 802.1X?

     hi, guys
            we are deploying CISCO video endpoints (SX 20) for out customers, as the access switch is 6509 which version is 12.2(33)SXJ5
    following is the configuration on the interface, but the endpoints can not pass through the authentication, and also it can not get  IP address
    from DHCP server , so just want to know whether if the 6509 switch support CDP BYPASS feature?
    interface GigabitEthernet x/xx
     switchport
     switchport access vlan 400
     switchport mode access
     switchport voice vlan 409
     authentication host-mode multi-domain
     authentication port-control auto
     authentication timer reauthenticate 65535
     authentication timer inactivity 120
     authentication violation restrict
     dot1x pae authenticator
     dot1x timeout tx-period 5
     dot1x timeout supp-timeout 10
     spanning-tree portfast edge

    What image are you running now ? I am facing the same problem in 8.4(1) workround : upgrade to 8.4(2)GLX.

  • Best practice for unmanaged switch to cisco switch

     In our environment, I have to allow some users to have a unmanaged switch which is connected to access port. 
     I put this configuration for each port which is connected to unmanaged switch (Netgear 8 port)
     interface GigabitEthernet1/0/47
     switchport port-security maximum 3
     spanning-tree guard root
    end
     port-security maximum 3: only allow 3 mac
     spanning-tree guard root: just in case to protect root bridge if someone put managed switch with lower bridge ID. 
     I connected one cable from unmanaged switch to another port to make a loop for test. 
     It showed that switch got "Loop-back detected" and put err-disable port automatically. So I don' t need to worry about this.
    Apr  7 18:33:01.370: %ETHCNTR-3-LOOP_BACK_DETECTED: Loop-back detected on GigabitEthernet1/0/47.
    Apr  7 18:33:01.370: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: loopback error detected on Gi1/0/47, putting Gi1/0/47 in err-disable state
    Apr  7 18:33:02.373: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/47, changed state to down
    Apr  7 18:33:03.379: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/47, changed state to down
    LAB_HQ_Fiber(config-if)#
     What are the option do you use usually to protect from unmanaged switch? 
     I am not able to use "spanning-tree bpduguard" because it will block a port 
     I can use "spanning-tree bpdufilter" to protect a STP area, but I don't think this is a big matter. 

    Hello
    If you need to attached these kind of switches/hubs - Make sure you shutdown all unused ports on the managed switch so to limit any further unauthorized attachments looping back into the network from the unmanageable device, This way you can managed these unmanageable devices to a certain extent.
    As for the stp root, you should manually set your stp priority on the managed switch to a low level anyway so as to not allow any other new device negotiate its self to become the root, and for the ports you are aware of that will have these devices attached, i would disable portfast and also advise against using bpdufilter as this negates the stp process.
    Int range fa0/x -xxx
    description unmanaged devices
    no cdp enable
    On all managed switches and on all ports you DONT expect to have unmanaged hubs/switches I would suggest to apply
    spanning-tree loopguard default
    udld enable
    udld aggressive
    int range fa0/x -xxx
    description access ports
    switchport port-security
    switchport port-security aging type inactivity
    switchport port-security violation restrict/shutdown
    switchport port-security maximum 2
    spanning-tree portfast
    spanning-tree bpduguard enable
    spanning-tree guard root
    no cdp enable
    One last thing I also wouldn't enable error recover either, as you would want to know the reason why your ports are erroring and not go chasing your tail as the reason why your having intermittent network issues.
    res
    Paul

  • WLC 2504 can't change WAP name or switch off CDP via WLC gui

    Hi All,
    Please can you assist? I have 1 x Cisco WLC 2504 & 2 x Cisco WAP AIR-CAP1602I-E-K9 running 7.4.100.60.
    All three devices are installed and working correcty within a corporate environment. However, there are a few tweaks that I would like to do, to tidy up the configuration and switch certain elements on or off. For example, my core networking hardware is Huawei and I would like to switch off 'CDP' on the WAP's as the associated error messages are filling up my logging buffer on my switch. So, I https to my WLC, locate the WAP in question, goto 'interfaces' and untick the box for 'CDP state' hit apply, then I get the following error message "controller name is mandatory when controller ip address is configured" and then the tick reappears!
    At present I have two WAP's. Both have static IP addresses and both are reachable on the network. The one WAP did allow me to change the name to something meaningful, but the other WAP would not let me and still has the default MAC address as its name. I have the same issue, when I try to change the name on the WAP it says "controller name is mandatory when controller ip address is configured"
    I have also tried to CLI directly in to the WAP to make these alterations, but as soon as i launch 'putty' it quits out. I guess this is locked down once the WAP's associate with the WLC.
    And around I go.... Someone must have been in this situation, what am i missing? Thanks in advance!

    Hi Andy,
    By default SSH & Telnet is disabled for WLC controlled APs. So you have to enable it first via WLC GUI in order to access the AP via telnet or SSH.
    Wireless -> Select your AP -> Advanced -> Tick Telnet/SSH boxes.
    If you could not change AP name via WLC GUI (it may be a bug), but as I said earlier try to change it via WLC CLI (not AP CLI itself). SSH  to your WLC & then try the following.Old AP name is the one with its mac address.
    (WLC) >config ap name
    (WLC) >save config      
    Are you sure you want to save? (y/n) y
    Configuration Saved
    HTH
    Rasika
    *** Pls rate all useful responses ****

  • Cisco sg 100d unmanaged switch not connecting to network

    I have a Cisco sg 100d-08 unmanaged switched that had been working just fine for several months  but now devices attached to the network thru are no longer on the network.  All lights are on indicating the ports are active.  Tried power recycle but no joy. When I replaced the switch with an old Belkin model everything works fine.  Is there anyway to reset this unmanaged switch or do I now just have an expensive paper weight?

    When the management interface is part of VLAN x
    Make sure that the management interface vlan id is set to 0  (untagged ) If the native vlan on the switch trunk connected to controller is vlan x. If the native vlan is something else make sure to tag the mangement interface vlan with x.
    Another interesting thing that might happen with switch having the following command enabled:
    SW(config)#dot1q tag native
    In that case all trunk native vlan frames will be tagged , so you have to tag the management vlan on the controller as well in that case.
    To be able to troubleshoot such connectivity problem, you should get the output of:
    show run int
    show interface <\\ > switchport
    the latter command should be your best friend.
    One recommondation, make sure to tag your management / ap-manager interface with vlan id  to maintain QoS limiting based on dot1p values for downstream traffic from the wired side.
    In the above scenario , If you can provide the output of show interface <\\> switchport
    I should tell you why the recommended action solved your issue based on the above explanation, and if you would like I can maitain the tag for you.
    Please Don't Forget to rate correct Answers

  • SD205 (unmanaged) switch and VLANs

    In addition to all my Cisco Catalyst (managed) switches, I have a bunch of Linksys SD205 unmanaged switches on my LAN. 
    I want to configure my network for VLANs, which means I will be changing all of my Cisco managed switches to a "trunking" configuration.   This configuration is working correctly with the Cisco Catalyst switches
    Question: can the SD205 function in this environment?  I know I can't set any of the ports on the SD205 to be "trunking", but I would like to connect the SD205 to a Cisco port that is "trunked", so the devices on the SD205 can communicate to the rest of the world.
    So far, I have not been successful, so -- maybe they just won't work in a trunked environment.  Anyone have a definitive answer?  If they simply can't do it, I'll stop wasting my time!
    Thanks
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    No. An unmanaged switch does not support 802.1q. It will drop any ethernet frame that has been 802.1q tagged. The only frames which go through an unmanaged switch are untagged frames, i.e. the native VLAN of the port on the Catalyst.
    If you want to use unmanaged switches you have to connect them to a port configured in access mode, member of a single VLAN. For example, you can configure a port on the Catalyst for access mode in VLAN 10 and connect an unmanaged switch to this port. Then all devices connected to the unmanaged switch will be VLAN 10. This is as much as you can do.
    But getting multiple VLANs through unmanaged switches is impossible as all ethernet frames on the unmanaged switch must be untagged.

  • 1 isp(T1), 1 unmanaged switch, 2 routers(WRT54G), 2 public ips

    1 isp(T1), 1 unmanaged switch, 2 routers(WRT54G), 2 public ips - How should I connect everthing?
    Help. I got a client with a T1 and multiple public IP's that he wants to share with his neighboring companies. How should I connect everying.

    You need a manageable switch and create VLAN so you can segement the taffic between the 2 internet connections.

  • Cisco 2960S FPS-L PoE switch with Avaya 9811g VOIP setup

    Hello,
    I am connecting a setup for data/voice connecting Catalyst 2960S-FPS-L PoE switch with Avaya 9811g series VOIP phone. As per my knowledge cisco switch works well with Cisco phone as it has got some builtin "Macros" and Intelligent PoE recognition when we connect device getting the details of another device through CDP. I understand I have to create data and voice vlan with QOS then enable trunking on the interface to other switch that is also 2960. Little confuse if is there any compatibility issues with Switch and Avaya phone regarding protocol/data/voice...?
    Do I have to do PoE config for each port on the each interface?
    any help or detail config will help.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi I am back after good research. created two vlan data and voice with trunk on interface1/0/48 given below config..
    connection b/w 2960s FPS Switch and Avaya 9611g IP Phone.
    lldp/cdp is enable on switch
    So I created this config if some one can take a look .
    expert advise if something wrong?..
    I am only concern with Voice and PoE as voice is my priority. do i have to map something for voice quality?
    also if i create another Trunk port one allow voice other allow data both cable will go to switch will that be issue?
    interface....
    switchport access vlan x
    switchport mode access
    switchport nonegotiate
    switchport voice vlan xx
    srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20
    queue-set 2
    priority-queue out
    mls qos trust cos
    auto qos voip trust
    spanning-tree portfast
    interface ........
    switchport trunk allowed vlan x,x
    switchport mode trunk
    switchport nonegotiate
    srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20
    queue-set 2
    priority-queue out
    mls qos trust cos
    auto qos voip trust

  • Catalyst Express 500 24TT linked to an unmanaged switch

    I'm trying to hang an unmanaged switch (netgear FS108)off this switch but with little success. I've configured the port on the Express 500 as a switch port but nodes connecting through the unmanaged switch can't fully browse nor can they receive DHCP addresses. Is there someway to make this work or are these Netgear switches simply not supported and won't work period?

    Yup, that worked. I assume the same issue applies to the 'server' port setting. If I've created multiple virtual servers each with their own unique IP address, the 'server' port settings spits back an error not allowing multiple connections through the same port.

  • Configure SG300 to work like an unmanaged switch

    Hi!
    How do i have to configure the SG300 so that it acts like any other completely unmanaged Switch. 
    I dont want to configure any vlans on the sg300. It should just work like there wouldnt be a sg300, but an unmanaged switch.
    The story behind:
    I want to use a SG300-28P as POE-Switch for FortiAP-Access Points, but it doesnt work out of the box cause FortiAP receives and sends some tagged and untagged VLAN-traffic.
    Everything works, if i use a cheaper, unmanaged POE-Switch, but i cant get it to work if i use a SG300.
    Thanks for any help.
    Tom

    Thanks for your help. After disabling CDP and LLDP it started working.

  • Extending VLANs over an unmanaged switch

    We have a network which consists of primarily Cisco 3560X switches and Meraki MR34 wireless access points.  We have a handful of VLANs setup.  In one instance, a WAP was plugged into an unmanaged SD100D-08 switch.  I would have expected this to "break" our wireless access.  However, it appears everything is working as we'd want.
    The switchport on the 3560X that the unmanaged switch is connected to is configured as a trunk port with the default VLAN of 1.  No matter which SSID/VLAN we connect to on the Meraki Access Points, we get assigned a proper IP in the VLAN that we'd expect.  If we connect a computer to the unmanaged switch, it gets an IP from VLAN 1, just as we would have wanted.
    Why is this working?  I thought the unmanaged switch would drop all packets with VLAN headers?

    Thanks for the quick response Jon.  I have continued with my testing and connected two 3560X switches together with the same unmanaged switch in between them. I configured the 3560X ports as trunk ports and am able to pass all VLANs between the two 3560X switches with the unmanaged switch in between.
    As you stated, it looks like the unmanaged switch is capable of handling the VLAN tagged frames and passing them out all connected ports.
    Obviously this configuration is not best practice, but I guess it is pretty cool it's working that way.
    Jason

  • How do i connect my 24 ports switch with e3000

    hello everybody, i know its a newbies question....but there's always a begining...
    I just bought a e3000 and I have a 24 ports switch. I would like to plug more than 8 pc...how do I proced ? I used to have a dlink router and just plug a cat5e from the dlint to the switch ... but it doesn't work with the e3000
    thanx in advance....
    Nay

    It's an unmanaged switch. All you should have to do it plug it into a lan port of the router. Doesn't matter which port on the switch, there is no configuration of the switch.
    What do you mean by not working? Are the link lights on? You aren't getting DHCP on clients on the switch or what's happening? 

  • SG100-24 Unmanaged Switch Issues

    I have a new SG100-24 Port Gigabyte unmanaged switch.  Recently some of the ports on the switch started acting up and we lost connectivty on several ports.  Called Cisco TAC and they sent me a new one, same issues on the replacement on several of the ports.  After further troubleshooting with TAC, it was determined that this is a known issue with this model of switch. If a port stops communicating the official work around from the TAC was to set the NIC card of the PC to 100 MB full and then normal connectivity returned to the PC from the troubled ports on the switch.
    This doesn't seem like the greatest work around solution to me, and at this time i was told Cisco has no official plan of action for a permanent fix for this model of switch, and that a replacement with a new model hasn't been approved by cisco.
    Does anybody have futher insight as to whether or not there will be a fix release ( maybe firmware ? ).  Or will cisco just replace this model with different model for customers experiencing this issue ?
    Thanks,
    Keith Arnold

    This does not sound correct .
    Setting a PC port to 100MFull will cause switch port auto-negotiation to fail.
    I will forward this posting to the unmanaged switch product manager for his comments.
    But in the mean time, can you please be so kind as to email me at [email protected]  with your Small Business Support Center Service Record(SR) number so I can check the case notes for more details.
    Usually this SR number  it starts with the numbers 61xxxxxxx
    regards Dave

  • Want to repair/replace 8 port unmanaged switch SD208T.

    Want to repair/replace 8 port unmanaged switch SD208T. material lying with us. where to send the same??
    Sonason Marketing & Services
    [email protected]
    09826024188 (India)

    Hello,
    Give us a call at the SBSC and we can check the warranty and possibly assist with getting a replacement.
    Cisco Small Business Support Center Contact Numbers
    Thank you for choosing Cisco,
    Christopher Ebert - Network Support Engineer
    Cisco Small Business Support Center
    *please rate helpful posts*

Maybe you are looking for

  • Photo Card Reader & iPad Mini

    Can I use the Apple iPad Camera Connection Kit to connect a Card Reader (compatible with 4 different cards for my different cameras) to my iPad Mini? I note the product description describes connecting my camera with a USB cable; would the card reade

  • The Power Query ribbon and the Power Pivot ribbon are gone !

    Hello, I created in Excel 2013, using Power Query, two large tables (more than 4 000 000 rows) according this principle: << However, the query pane that shows up on the side while data is loading lets you disable "load to worksheet". The data will co

  • PPP Callback over ISDN failure - user not authorised

    Hi,I'm still a rookie with Cisco and in need of help: Have a MS XP PC dialing into 803 over ISDN, successfully connecting if 803 config'd for Callback optional (no callback secure) but failing for callback secure with log message "Callback not author

  • Service Registry: why do i need two bindings (wsdlDeployment and endPoint)

    based on the technical note of Clemens Utschig "Enabling a Dynamic, Reusable SOA with Oracle BPEL Process Manager and Oracle Service Registry" i have one question: why do i need two bindings (wsdlDeployment and endPoint) in my service in the service

  • X-fi Xtreme Audio card problems!

    Hi!?I bought a X-fi Xtreme Audio card today. installed, and now I get a big fps drop in Battlefield 2, first of all I cant enable Creative X-fi in the Audio tap under options in the game, it says the card does not supoort bla bla bla, if I chose to u