1 isp(T1), 1 unmanaged switch, 2 routers(WRT54G), 2 public ips

1 isp(T1), 1 unmanaged switch, 2 routers(WRT54G), 2 public ips - How should I connect everthing?
Help. I got a client with a T1 and multiple public IP's that he wants to share with his neighboring companies. How should I connect everying.

You need a manageable switch and create VLAN so you can segement the taffic between the 2 internet connections.

Similar Messages

  • I've recently switched routers on my iMac. The set-up appeared to go well, and my incoming mail is working, but my outgoing mail is not. I spent a long time sorting out the problem with my provider, who told me the problem is on the "Apple side".

    I've recently switched routers on my iMac. The set-up seemed to go well, and the incoming mail works. The outgoing mail is the issue - it sits in the outbox buffering and doesn't send. After several calls to my service provider they decided the issue was on the "Apple side" since my internet connection seemed to be working fine, and all input information was correct - ports selected, etc. Any ideas what to try next?

    Open Keychain in Utilites and delete all the "outgoing" entries (will probably be smtp.<your ISP name>.net). Then go into Mail Preferences>Accounts, clear out any passwords for the outgoing. Can't say exactly where this is or what this looks like in 10.7, since I'm running 10.6. Then enter new (EDIT: or can be the same old ones) passwords, or password. Allow Keychain to save those new ones.
    FWIW, here's what this looks like in mine.

  • How do I configure Time Capsule to work with 8 port unmanaged switch?

    This is what I want to end up with.
    cable modem
    Time Capsule
                                                            wireless network           8 port unmanaged switch TRENDnet TEGS80G
                                                                                                  entertainment center(TV, xbox 360, dvd, apple tv, ect...)
    I have been using the above setup with an E3000 router in place of the time capsule without any problems, and was expecting to just be able to switch out the E3000 for the time capsule and keep right on rolling. At the moment, without the switch plugged in, using the time capsule as a stand alone wireless router, everything works as intended. However, I don't want to have every device in the house pulling off of wireless. Whenever I plug my switch in I lose internet connectivity. I assume this is because both the switch and the Time Capsule are trying to direct traffic and creating a conflict. I have attempted to disable the NAT in the Airport Utility and this is what happens.
    Where do I go from here, or am I heading in completely the wrong direction?

    Unfortunately, you are on the wrong track, heading in the wrong direction at the moment.
    We need to learn whether you have a simple modem or a modem/router.
    This will determine whether the Time Capsule is to be configured in router mode to provide DHCP and NAT services for the network......or if your "modem" is already doing this.....the Time Capsule needs to be configured in Bridge Mode.
    So, I suggest that you disconnect the switch from the Time Capsule for now, and power everything off except the modem, Time Capsule and the computer you are using to configure the Time Capsule, and get things working correctly first. Then, devices can be added one at a time to verify proper operation.
    If this seems to make sense to you, and you want to move forward, please post back with the make and model number of your cable modem.

  • Best practice for unmanaged switch to cisco switch

     In our environment, I have to allow some users to have a unmanaged switch which is connected to access port. 
     I put this configuration for each port which is connected to unmanaged switch (Netgear 8 port)
     interface GigabitEthernet1/0/47
     switchport port-security maximum 3
     spanning-tree guard root
    end
     port-security maximum 3: only allow 3 mac
     spanning-tree guard root: just in case to protect root bridge if someone put managed switch with lower bridge ID. 
     I connected one cable from unmanaged switch to another port to make a loop for test. 
     It showed that switch got "Loop-back detected" and put err-disable port automatically. So I don' t need to worry about this.
    Apr  7 18:33:01.370: %ETHCNTR-3-LOOP_BACK_DETECTED: Loop-back detected on GigabitEthernet1/0/47.
    Apr  7 18:33:01.370: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: loopback error detected on Gi1/0/47, putting Gi1/0/47 in err-disable state
    Apr  7 18:33:02.373: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/47, changed state to down
    Apr  7 18:33:03.379: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/47, changed state to down
    LAB_HQ_Fiber(config-if)#
     What are the option do you use usually to protect from unmanaged switch? 
     I am not able to use "spanning-tree bpduguard" because it will block a port 
     I can use "spanning-tree bpdufilter" to protect a STP area, but I don't think this is a big matter. 

    Hello
    If you need to attached these kind of switches/hubs - Make sure you shutdown all unused ports on the managed switch so to limit any further unauthorized attachments looping back into the network from the unmanageable device, This way you can managed these unmanageable devices to a certain extent.
    As for the stp root, you should manually set your stp priority on the managed switch to a low level anyway so as to not allow any other new device negotiate its self to become the root, and for the ports you are aware of that will have these devices attached, i would disable portfast and also advise against using bpdufilter as this negates the stp process.
    Int range fa0/x -xxx
    description unmanaged devices
    no cdp enable
    On all managed switches and on all ports you DONT expect to have unmanaged hubs/switches I would suggest to apply
    spanning-tree loopguard default
    udld enable
    udld aggressive
    int range fa0/x -xxx
    description access ports
    switchport port-security
    switchport port-security aging type inactivity
    switchport port-security violation restrict/shutdown
    switchport port-security maximum 2
    spanning-tree portfast
    spanning-tree bpduguard enable
    spanning-tree guard root
    no cdp enable
    One last thing I also wouldn't enable error recover either, as you would want to know the reason why your ports are erroring and not go chasing your tail as the reason why your having intermittent network issues.
    res
    Paul

  • Monitor Dell Powerconnect Switches/Routers using SCOM 2012

    Hello,
    We are trying to find a way to monitor approximately 20-25 Dell Powerconnect switches/routers (models 5324,5424,5448,5548,6224,6024) through SCOM 2012.
    Using SCOM network discovery we are able to get all Dell Powerconnect switches listed, but we are unable to get a network node dashboard, nor vicinity view 1 or 2 hops further. We are able to only see connected network printers and some serial/ethernet devices
    we have.
    In addition, SCOM 2012 seems to be able to recognize the model of only Dell Powerconnect 5224 switches. We have found that on the SCOM management server the "C:\Program Files\System Center 2012\Operations Manager\Server\NetworkMonitoring\conf\discovery\oid2type_Dell.conf"
    only lists Dell Powerconnect 5224 switches as well as several models from the 3000 series.
    We have contacted Dell PRO support, but their reply was that there is no management pack for SCOM available for their networking devices.
    Would it be recommended to use http://xsnmp.codeplex.com/ on SCOM 2012 to monitor those switches and get a network digram view or are there any plans to include those MIBs in a future CU or SP of SCOM 2012? 

    Hi Alex
    Network monitoring has changed from SCOM 2007 R2 to SCOM 2012 so this statement
    "but if this works for SCOM 2007, it should apply to SCOM 2012"
    is not accurate when it comes to network monitoring:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/momteam/archive/2011/10/24/migrating-operations-manager-2007-network-monitoring.aspx
    Would it be recommended to use http://xsnmp.codeplex.com/ on SCOM 2012? 
    The codeplex solutions for SCOM 2007 R2 will not work on a new \ clean install of SCOM 2012 (if you upgrade from SCOM 2007 R2 they continue to work as legacy devices but you can't add more monitoring).
    SCOM 2012 seems to be able to recognize the model of only Dell Powerconnect 5224 switches
    What do you mean by recoginse? SCOM can discover network devices but there is an "approved" list that allows for extended monitoring:
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=26831
    You should still be able to discover and monitor other devices though:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/momteam/archive/2011/09/20/what-gets-monitored-with-system-center-operations-manager-2012-network-monitoring.aspx
    Cheers
    Graham
    Regards Graham New System Center 2012 Blog! -
    http://www.systemcentersolutions.co.uk
    View OpsMgr tips and tricks at
    http://systemcentersolutions.wordpress.com/

  • Cisco sg 100d unmanaged switch not connecting to network

    I have a Cisco sg 100d-08 unmanaged switched that had been working just fine for several months  but now devices attached to the network thru are no longer on the network.  All lights are on indicating the ports are active.  Tried power recycle but no joy. When I replaced the switch with an old Belkin model everything works fine.  Is there anyway to reset this unmanaged switch or do I now just have an expensive paper weight?

    When the management interface is part of VLAN x
    Make sure that the management interface vlan id is set to 0  (untagged ) If the native vlan on the switch trunk connected to controller is vlan x. If the native vlan is something else make sure to tag the mangement interface vlan with x.
    Another interesting thing that might happen with switch having the following command enabled:
    SW(config)#dot1q tag native
    In that case all trunk native vlan frames will be tagged , so you have to tag the management vlan on the controller as well in that case.
    To be able to troubleshoot such connectivity problem, you should get the output of:
    show run int
    show interface <\\ > switchport
    the latter command should be your best friend.
    One recommondation, make sure to tag your management / ap-manager interface with vlan id  to maintain QoS limiting based on dot1p values for downstream traffic from the wired side.
    In the above scenario , If you can provide the output of show interface <\\> switchport
    I should tell you why the recommended action solved your issue based on the above explanation, and if you would like I can maitain the tag for you.
    Please Don't Forget to rate correct Answers

  • Connect unmanaged switch to 887VA fast ethernet port

    I tried connecting an unmanaged (and dumb) switch to one of the four fast ethernet ports on the back of the router. I configured the port to act as an access port bound to a specific VLAN, say no. 100.
    What I can see on the LEDs of the unmanaged switch is that the link goes up and down every few seconds. I don't know if this is related to the spanning tree protocol and unfortunately the unmanaged switch doesn't know about STP and doesn't send out BPDUs.
    So, how I should configure the port in order to avoid the link going up and down?
    The actual conf. for the port:
    interface fastEthernet 3
    switchport mode access
    switchport access vlan 100

    What do you mean by dumb siwthc? What model/make/company is that switch?
    Can you try to do the reset of the switch so that it wipe off all the config what so ever present on the box and then try to connect the switch to the router?

  • SD205 (unmanaged) switch and VLANs

    In addition to all my Cisco Catalyst (managed) switches, I have a bunch of Linksys SD205 unmanaged switches on my LAN. 
    I want to configure my network for VLANs, which means I will be changing all of my Cisco managed switches to a "trunking" configuration.   This configuration is working correctly with the Cisco Catalyst switches
    Question: can the SD205 function in this environment?  I know I can't set any of the ports on the SD205 to be "trunking", but I would like to connect the SD205 to a Cisco port that is "trunked", so the devices on the SD205 can communicate to the rest of the world.
    So far, I have not been successful, so -- maybe they just won't work in a trunked environment.  Anyone have a definitive answer?  If they simply can't do it, I'll stop wasting my time!
    Thanks
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    No. An unmanaged switch does not support 802.1q. It will drop any ethernet frame that has been 802.1q tagged. The only frames which go through an unmanaged switch are untagged frames, i.e. the native VLAN of the port on the Catalyst.
    If you want to use unmanaged switches you have to connect them to a port configured in access mode, member of a single VLAN. For example, you can configure a port on the Catalyst for access mode in VLAN 10 and connect an unmanaged switch to this port. Then all devices connected to the unmanaged switch will be VLAN 10. This is as much as you can do.
    But getting multiple VLANs through unmanaged switches is impossible as all ethernet frames on the unmanaged switch must be untagged.

  • Catalyst Express 500 24TT linked to an unmanaged switch

    I'm trying to hang an unmanaged switch (netgear FS108)off this switch but with little success. I've configured the port on the Express 500 as a switch port but nodes connecting through the unmanaged switch can't fully browse nor can they receive DHCP addresses. Is there someway to make this work or are these Netgear switches simply not supported and won't work period?

    Yup, that worked. I assume the same issue applies to the 'server' port setting. If I've created multiple virtual servers each with their own unique IP address, the 'server' port settings spits back an error not allowing multiple connections through the same port.

  • How to capture CISCO Switches / Routers CPU Utilization in MRTG

    Hi,
    I’m using CISCO Switches / Routers and wanted to capture the CPU Utilization of those devices in MRTG. Can anyone help me to get step by step information. Please.!

    Thanks Vinod..!
    I already have MRTG installed and monitoring link bandwidth utilization. Now, Wanted to capture the CPU utilization for those devices.  Can i know the configuration detail needs to be applied in MRTG / Routers or Switches.
    Provided URL don't have much detailed configuration needs to be done at both the side (MRTG / CISCO Devices). Please.
    Thanks,
    Tamil

  • Cisco 5 port and 8 port gigabit unmanaged switches

    I am looking for 5 port and 8 port gigabit unmanaged switches in Cisco. Please provide the BoM for the same. As per my understanding the following switches can suffice the requirement (SG100D-05 and SG100D-080) however I am not sure about the DC power, whether they can be used in normal AC environments.
     

    The SG100D-05 and SG100D-08 are too small and their power requirements are too low to justify building an AC power supply into them like the larger SGx00 switches have, so they are wired to accept DC power and use an external power adapter (included) for connection to an AC environment.
    There are really no optional components to these devices, so the BOM would be as follows:
    5-port SG100D swich: SG100D-05
    8-port SG100D swich: SG100D-08

  • Configure SG300 to work like an unmanaged switch

    Hi!
    How do i have to configure the SG300 so that it acts like any other completely unmanaged Switch. 
    I dont want to configure any vlans on the sg300. It should just work like there wouldnt be a sg300, but an unmanaged switch.
    The story behind:
    I want to use a SG300-28P as POE-Switch for FortiAP-Access Points, but it doesnt work out of the box cause FortiAP receives and sends some tagged and untagged VLAN-traffic.
    Everything works, if i use a cheaper, unmanaged POE-Switch, but i cant get it to work if i use a SG300.
    Thanks for any help.
    Tom

    Thanks for your help. After disabling CDP and LLDP it started working.

  • Extending VLANs over an unmanaged switch

    We have a network which consists of primarily Cisco 3560X switches and Meraki MR34 wireless access points.  We have a handful of VLANs setup.  In one instance, a WAP was plugged into an unmanaged SD100D-08 switch.  I would have expected this to "break" our wireless access.  However, it appears everything is working as we'd want.
    The switchport on the 3560X that the unmanaged switch is connected to is configured as a trunk port with the default VLAN of 1.  No matter which SSID/VLAN we connect to on the Meraki Access Points, we get assigned a proper IP in the VLAN that we'd expect.  If we connect a computer to the unmanaged switch, it gets an IP from VLAN 1, just as we would have wanted.
    Why is this working?  I thought the unmanaged switch would drop all packets with VLAN headers?

    Thanks for the quick response Jon.  I have continued with my testing and connected two 3560X switches together with the same unmanaged switch in between them. I configured the 3560X ports as trunk ports and am able to pass all VLANs between the two 3560X switches with the unmanaged switch in between.
    As you stated, it looks like the unmanaged switch is capable of handling the VLAN tagged frames and passing them out all connected ports.
    Obviously this configuration is not best practice, but I guess it is pretty cool it's working that way.
    Jason

  • Unmanaged Switches

    Do unmanaged switches for ex. 3com officeconnect unmanaged 8 port switches have MAC address tables.
    For ex. I have a 8 port 3com unmanaged switch connected to port 0/1 on a 3750 switch.
    Does the unmanaged switch keep track of the MAC addresses that it has for its 8 ports ? or is it like a hub and repeates the signal ?
    If it doesnt have a MAC address table, wouldnt it be considered a Layer 1 switch ?

    yes even nonmanagable switch also keep their MAC address table in order to perform the switching function...they are able to do all the normal switching function which we can able to do in our manageable switch...the only thing is you cannot configure it to make it work for your purpose...
    and when ever you are talking about layer1 device then they always going to have broadcasting of packet as they are not using any addressing...so those devices are only having brodcast...
    hope this will help you
    rate this post if it helps
    regards
    Devang

  • SG100-24 Unmanaged Switch Issues

    I have a new SG100-24 Port Gigabyte unmanaged switch.  Recently some of the ports on the switch started acting up and we lost connectivty on several ports.  Called Cisco TAC and they sent me a new one, same issues on the replacement on several of the ports.  After further troubleshooting with TAC, it was determined that this is a known issue with this model of switch. If a port stops communicating the official work around from the TAC was to set the NIC card of the PC to 100 MB full and then normal connectivity returned to the PC from the troubled ports on the switch.
    This doesn't seem like the greatest work around solution to me, and at this time i was told Cisco has no official plan of action for a permanent fix for this model of switch, and that a replacement with a new model hasn't been approved by cisco.
    Does anybody have futher insight as to whether or not there will be a fix release ( maybe firmware ? ).  Or will cisco just replace this model with different model for customers experiencing this issue ?
    Thanks,
    Keith Arnold

    This does not sound correct .
    Setting a PC port to 100MFull will cause switch port auto-negotiation to fail.
    I will forward this posting to the unmanaged switch product manager for his comments.
    But in the mean time, can you please be so kind as to email me at [email protected]  with your Small Business Support Center Service Record(SR) number so I can check the case notes for more details.
    Usually this SR number  it starts with the numbers 61xxxxxxx
    regards Dave

Maybe you are looking for