Update delay simulating

Hello all,
we have the following situation. From the repair order a service order is created. As per standard SAP u can configure the service order is released during it's creation. But due to certain reasons we are not using the SAP provided configuration for auto release. Instead we have recorded a BDC so that if a certain condition is met the service order will be released. Now the problem is that this BDC is running even before the service order creation is complete. Sometimes the complete updation of the service order in the database is not yet complete. Meanwhile this service order is being tried to be released. This is causing a failure and hence the service order is left unreleased.
Now, we are trying to fix this situation. But my problem is that how can I test this? How will I know if my solution has fixed the problem? How can I simulate such update delays?
Eagerly awaiting answers.
thanks
Bala

hi
this may happen due to that same time u r trying to update fields which are in same table that first update happened and second update not happened due to transaction commit.
Use
wait upto 5 sec.
after first update then
commit work.
then second update.
Hope now u got the problem.
mark points if helpful.
regs
Manas Ranjan Panda

Similar Messages

Update delayed error

Dear Team,
Good day.........
We are using SQL 2005 sp2 as DB &I am facing Update termination error. When
Creating any document then document no is Generated but it will take time 5 to 10 min to
Update in Db Table .I am getting Update Delay error. & ABAP error in update etc.
same time users are complaining that document no lock error is coming & if they used
the same document no created before2 min back then it is showing document no doesnu2019t
exit though it already created before 2 min but not showing in table.
kindly help me for the same.
Regards
Rabin nayak
SAP Basis Team

Hi
Error is resolved. that is OS level error.
Thanks
bala

"Update Delayed" while saving an Asset Master

Hi,
When I am changing an Asset master(AS02) it doesn't change and I get a message on status bar "Update Delayed". I debugged the standard program and everything goes fine but when it encounters "Commit work" statement it gets hanged and gives message "Update Delayed".
Any pointer is appreciated.
Thanks & regards,
Deepak

Update delays sometimes mean that there is a queue waiting at the UPD task. Go to SM51 and check to make sure that there are no other tasks waiting to be processed. Check with you Basis group - they might be able to run some diagnostics on the update task.

Update delay

Hello all,
I am getting the problem that when i am saving any document in my system the after clicking the post button
give messege that " update delayed .please wait"
what to do?

you don´t need to remove the dump - but the cause of it.
A program is dumping when it has errors. Post the first pages of the dump here and we can see if we can help.
Markus

Update Delay in VL01N

Dear Guys
At the time of VL01N ( Delivery Creation ) Update delay is coming.
At ST22 is showing the error like ROLLBACK_IN_POSTING.
Our conf as below:
OS : Sun solaris 8
DB : Oracle
SAP : 4.6C
Please guide me to solve the issue.
Regards,
P.Selvendran

<Grumpy Mode on>
> This is a known problem that might be caused because of some of the tables are almost reach the MaxExtents limits.
could you tell me the note where I can find this information?
It does not matter how much I look at the information on the OP I do not see anything at all that point to a DB problem
I'm not saying that is not a DB problem, I'm saying that there is no information.
ROLLBACK_IN_POSTING does not indicate a DB issue.
What it indicates is that an error happened during posting and it had to be rolled back. It is a message issued by SAP and not by the database and provides absolutely no useful information, more investigation is needed.
> I would recommend using SAPDBA
I would recommed NOT to use SAPDBA as it is a very old product, not supported and replaced a long time ago.
Of course, we do not know the DB version, it could be very old and SAPDBA could work,
Guessing from SAP Note 156548 - Released operating systems SAP kernel 4.6x ORACLE:
> OS : Sun solaris 8
> DB : Oracle
> SAP : 4.6C
For this combination the Oracle version could be from 8.1.6 to 10.2. Only use SAPDBA if you are using 8.1.6 or 8.17 (and you should upgrade ASAP to something newer and supported) for any other version use BR* tools
<Grumpy Mode off>
take a look at the ST22 before the message ROLLBACK_IN_POSTING, is there any other error?
take a look at the developer traces of the process who issued the error, are there errors?
analyze those errors, depending on them we could provide some help based on facts
Edited by: Fidel Vales on Oct 1, 2008 6:37 PM

Trying to understand Android OS updates delays

This is not another hate mail, it´s more about trying to understand the facts and motives regarding the OS updates (or lack of).
Hopefully this material will arrive at someone from Sony with enough power to do something about it.
Ever since I can remember, Sony has been THE brand for electronics. I can´t remember a TV or VCR in my house that it wasn´t Sony, and they lasted for LOTS of years.
When a couple years ago I finally had the money (and the need) for a Smartphone, i chose the X10 Mini, which is a great little phone from a great brand, but it´s stuck at Android 2.1... which makes it a crippled android nowadays...
It really bothered me the lack of OS updates, so I chose to buy a Galaxy Nexus, but it´s really expensive in my country. So my second option was a Galaxy Ace 2, but they haven´t arrived to my country yet, so I went with my third option: Xperia Sola, knowing beforehand that it´s a great phone, a great brand, but I might get slow OS updates.
I bought it about 10 days ago when I saw they were starting to roll out the updates.
10 days later I still don´t have my update. And not only that, but I don´t see much light at the end of the tunnel...
I found a thread with the SI numbers that were updated, and there were a bunch on Oct 1, another bunch on Oct 4, and one code on Oct 8, and no other update since...
I also read that those who did get the update, were having bugs with the OS, and also found threads from other Xperia models, whose updates began rolling 3 months ago, and there is still people who hasn´t gotten the update...
As a customer, and a owner/CEO of a small company, I have a really hard time understanding how a HUGE company like Sony can be making such mistakes...
I have been thinking objective reasons, and I can only think of one. I know it´s a wild guess, but I´m starting to think that our salvation might be the very thing that means our condemnation: CYANOGENMOD!!!
Think about it: Why would Sony spend more money hiring twice as much programmers, when they can make only one update per phone, and sit down and see how CM releases begin to appear, for all tastes and needs. And... IT´s FREE!!!
Also, if there is a software related problem (way more likely than a hardware problem), then the CM developers take the fall, instead of Sony. And I´m beginning to see custom OS installers that are more user friendly, so it might be something that they take in accout when neglecting OS updates.
If that´s the line Sony is following, it´s a very risky move and it won´t work. Sony Mobile will crash and burn, but it´s still a better business plan that "let´s get lazy and make ULTRA slow updates so we don´t spend a lot of money programming".
If you can´t afford more programmers, stop including so much bells and whistles and make your OS near vanilla. Include a couple of Xperia menus, a custom theme and voila!
The main reason I wanted the Galaxy Nexus is Vanilla OS, which means inmediate OS updates. Sony on the other hand, takes a year or two to release it after its launch. If they release it at all...
Another though... why not stop making that many different phones! Really! There are like 5 Xperia models i can´t tell one from the other... even with specs side by side!
You are trying to make too many phones and you are failing with all of them! (Software and software updates are also part of the phone, one of the most importants...)
I know hiring programmers is expensive, but you are sacrificing one of the most expensive values for a company EVER: Customer credibility! Which as you know better than me, takes years to create.
If Apple had problems with carriers and code aprooving and stuff, they might get away with it, becouse they alone have all the devices. If iOS 6 is delayed a few months, it´s delayed for everyone, and besides Apple fanboys rarely complain about Mac products, but Android is a more independent and educated market.
I´m not saying that Apple users are ignorant, not at all, but I´m pretty sure most iPhone owners don´t even know what processor or how much RAM their phone has. They just "swallow" the Apple Way of Life. (it´s a good phone becouse Apple says so).
The Android user on the other side, because of the fragmentation of the market, has many brands and models to choose from. An Android user about to buy a new phone will most likely go online looking for different models, specs, reviews in webs and forums...etc.
You can´t say "I don´t know how HTC and other companies get their updates so soon, but we take a lot more becouse Google and the Operators must aproove the code.", because there are many other brands that have exactly the same difficulties or more, since they are smaller, and we can SEE online that they are indeed delivering solid and relativly fast updates.
Did we miss something? Does HTC use Witchcraft to get their code aprooved?
My underlying point is this: You are getting lazy... VERY lazy with software programming for your phones, and WE KNOW IT!
It´s not the "difficulties" you claim, becouse every brand has those difficulties.
This isn´t 1999 you know. We are in the information age. If you lie to us and tell us that your phones have the latest OS, I can go online and see that you don´t (Hello!!!). If I see that the company lies to it´s customers, I will stop buying their products. If I´m so dissapointed with how Sony handles OS updates and their customers queries about it, then I want for the first time ever to sell my Cell Phone becouse I´m not happy with it, or the brand behind it.
We also live in the "Here and now" age. You can´t expect your customers to read about new Android releases on news and blogs, and wait YEARS with arms crossed waiting for their update... The world doesn´t work like that. Not anymore at least...
It´s not a matter of how many recources you have, it´s about how you use and balance them. GIVE MORE IMPORTANCE TO SOFTWARE UPDATES! IT´S WAY MORE IMPORTANT THAT YOU THINK! LISTEN TO YOUR CUSTOMERS!!!
You guys are Sony are smart and design great products, but you are not GOD! You are not our wife, no one has sworn alliagence to you.
If you stop giving us good products and start lying to us, we hate you and stop giving you our money. Simple as that.
My sola is beatiful, I love the design, the screen, the hardware... but it hasn´t been updated yet to 4.0, not to mention 4.1, which REALLY is the latest version... so stop advertising that your phones have the latest Android OS, unless you want angry customers switching to other companies, which you are getting.
I also read some stories that Androind 4.0 was announced for the Xperia PLAY, and then it was called off... Do you have any idea how pissed I would be and ripped off I would be if I bought my phone based in that information and then you say it won´t be available?
Well, actually right now my possition is worse, since you SAY you will update my phone, but you don´t say when, and I read online about people still not getting their updates months after the rollout started, so I´m in the limbo right now...
As a company, one of the worse things you can do is calling your customers stupid, and when I see the answers you give in this forum, then I feel insulted. I feel like they are talking to an idiot or ignorant person with the so called "diplomatic" answers, which are basicly empty excuses for not doing your job right.
You gave us the frikking CDs, DVDs and Blu-Rays!!! Don´t tell us you can´t tweak an already built OS in a year!
I really hope you change their OS update policies really soon, before you lose the already small cellphone market share you have, or at least change your P.R. and C.M. policies towards a more open one.
We all are humans and make mistakes, but we customers really appreciate honesty and truth.
Have an open conversation with your customers! Don´t lie about your shortcomings! Accept then and ask the community to help you solve them, ask them what they biggest problems are, what features are most important to them, how often do they expect updates... LISTEN TO THEM!!
"Succes is a meneace. It tricks smart people into thinking they can´t lose."
Ps: Nothing personal with the mods from this forum, I´m not killing the messenger, I know that you can ONLY give the info you are allowed to give, and even if you wanted, you probably don´t know the answers yourself, since you work in the Communications department, not Developement or anything technical, and if you can't give any given info, then they probably won´t give it to you either... My message is to the company as a whole. I just hope you will be a good messenger and give this to whoever needs to read it.

My bad, it´s closer to 40 the number of phones released hehe
I know it´s all about money, and I know Sony is obligated to neglect users who haven´t given them money after an x ammount of time. However, it´s not a matter of making the phones obsolete earlier, so the users want to buy a new phone faster and therefore getting more money.
A person will buy a new phone when he/she has the money to do so and wants to do so.
It´s not a matter of WHEN. It´s a matter of WHAT.
The question is not "When will that user buy a new phone?", but rather "When that user buys a new phone, whenever that is, what phone will it be?"
I have a love/hate relationship with Apple. I would never use a iPhone. I would love having any Mac, if someone gives it to me, but I would never spend my harn earned dollars on such an overpriced piece of hardware over general principals.
However, i do recognice that Steve Jobs was a business genius. Weather you like or love his ideas and methods, he turned a garage project into the biggest company in the world, with a market value higher than Exxon with 1/3 of it´s assets.
Apple is a money making machine, and that is where the "hate" part of my relationship comes from.
However, it surprised me a lot to see that they released iOS 6 for the iPhone 3GS, released in 2008!
That get´s you thinking, that inside all that "SELL NOW" culture Apple is, they also support their older devices that people bought years ago but can't buy a new phone now. However, when they can do it, it will surely be another iPhone. Because they FEEL that the company listens and cares for them.
Also if you jump from iOS 6 on the 3 GS to a brand new iPhone 5, the transition will be virtually non-existant, except for Siri and a couple of features.
However jumping from Android 1.5 or 2.1 to Jelly Bean, might not be so easy on some users, making them more likely to give iPhone a shot.
Since they have to adapt to another phone anyway, they might as well try the apple...
And for old users, it gives people a sense of continuity and care about the user. Otherwise we feel like being kicked out of a restaurant right after we payed the bill.

Record in DSO Active Table different from result of Update Rule Simulation

Hi,
I have a problem with the update of a particular Data Field for certain records via an Update Routine in 3.x Update Rules, from a Source DSO to one Target DSO.
The DSO Key is the same in the Source DSO and the Target DSO. The Update Routine for the particular (target) Key Figure performs a calculation based on a number of COMM_STRUCTURE Data Fields and gives the Result. For this specific record, the Result being written to the target DSO is 0.00 (It is an 'Amount' Key Figure).
Based on the Update Routine (which I have run through functionally), this is the incorrect result.
However, I have run Simulation for this record and the correct result is simulated into the Data Target. I have also run the simulation with Debugging on the Update Rules. Each component/step of the Update Routine is processed correctly, eventually giving the correct result.
I have tried to re-perform the load and I continually get the same result. This is occurring for a number of records being updated, but not all. Some records where the result of this Data Field is being calculated correctly are 'identical' in all important areas to the problem records.
The problem records all appear to be in the same Data Package, however that Data Package also contains records being processed correctly.
Based on the Simulation/Debugging it appears that the Update Routine is correct, however if anyone is willing to have a stab at this I am happy to send you the code.
Also, a short time ago, we took a copy back from our Production system to our QA system. As a result, this record exists in the QA system as well. I have performed the load there and the record is processed correctly. The Production and QA systems are in line.
Thanks and Regards,
Tom

Hi Ramesh,
Thanks for posting a response. This is an Update Routine rather than a Start Routine.
Also, in answer to the Sudhi's reply/post, Yes, the Update Type has been set to Overwrite.
The problem is actually only present in Production. Changes was made through our landscape some time ago (this is not my development).
These changes have been tested through QA and were working. It is only when a reload has taken place in production that this issue has been occurred. A reload has then taken place in QA and has worked successfully.

OS X 10.6.3 update delays Sleep and Shutdown execution

Hi,
I updated my mac mini (Late 2009) after a lot of apprehension to the latest 10.6.3 version and find that "sleep" execution has increased from almost instantaneous on 10.6.2 to almost 34 seconds. Shutdown execution has increased from a quick 4 seconds to 36 seconds, boot time has also increased from 32 to 36 seconds. Will someone at Apple please look into this and release a patch - this is most irritating - upgrades are supposed to improve performance and not degrade it.
Can any user upgrading to 10.6.3 confirm these time delays please. Thanks you.

Sorry, I wrote iMac above. I forgot which forum I was in!
When I see that there is something vital, such as a upgrade to Mac OS X or a Security update, I decline allowing SU to do the installation. Then I go to the Apple Downloads page and manually download and apply the update/upgrade. If it is an OS update, I download the larger Combo version. Before I manually install the updates I first shut down all other processes and then use Disk Utility to repair the disk permissions. (Actually, I repair the disk permissions before and after the installation.) I also Verify the disk and if there are issues found, I boot from the install DVD and use Disk Utility in the Installer's Utilities menu to repair the disk. Then I install the update.
To reset the PRAM (re)start your Mac and immediately press & hold, all at the same time, the CommandOption+PR keys until you have heard the startup chime for a second time, then release all of the keys and allow the Mac to boot.
To reset the SMC;
• Shut down your Mac.
• Detach the power cord from the rear of the Mac mini.
• Press and hold the power button for 5 seconds.
• Release the power button.
• Attach the computer's power cable.
• Turn on the computer.
Also repair the disk permissions. Another thing you might try is getting a copy of OnyX and letting it clear out your caches on occasion.

Symbian Belle update delayed again?

Man Nokia have really become pathetic. Before anyone starts bashing me, like I said in my previous post I am a loyal Nokia customer, I have had all kinds of different Symbian phones and have a N8 here in the US where Symbian is dead and almost nobody knows of Symbian. Not only have Nokia fallen from the throne as mobile kings but their employees here are anything but helpful, if you get disappointed that Belle is delayed you are told to leave and join an Apple forum or you are told that Belle will be released in Q4 2011 and then it gets delayed to Q1 2012.
1. First of all Belle brings features that other OS have had for over a year now so it's not bringing anything new at all cause if it was then the delay would be justified.
2. We are closely going into 2012 and Nokia still producing phones like X2-05 or with s40 to compete with dual core phones. Nokia has yet to produce one 4G phone while others have done that in the beginning of 2011. Up until September Nokia didn't even have a 1GHz phone available while others have tons of dual core phones in the market.
3. When polls/statistics are conducted showing which operating system people use more, Symbian doesn't even appear in the US region (probably under "Others") and it is no longer number one in Europe or Asia. Even in Finland Nokia has lost 50% of it's market meaning that only 30 something % of people use a Nokia phone, how embarassing.
4. For anyone who is going to say that you only pay for the phone and it's current OS, not for updates, well I suggest that they wake up and realize that we live in 2011 and not 2004 anymore. Software updates are mandatory to all electronic devices, please name one TV, cellphone, game console etc that does not offer software updates at all and only has the original software to offer. NONE! Softwares always get updated because of new features that come out and to fix bugs, Nokia is way behind with features and it has thousands of bugs/glitches so yeah, updates are mandatory!
5. It is really a shame that Nokia has left the Symbian OS totally behind. All the Nokia blogs and pages talk about WP7, the Nokia World Conference this October hardly even mentioned Symbian. Symbian has brought Nokia where it is and look at how it's being handled. Pathetic.
6. Nokia N9? Genius and the most stupid thing ever done by Nokia. The phone is excellent, unique and it can outsell all the Androids and iPhones out there and yet it is given an OS which Nokia itself will not develop. How to you expect something so great and awesome to sell when it's the only current generation phone out there with Meego and you declare that you will not make any other Meegos or develop the one you have? Stupid stupid stupid.
7. Anna was announced back in March/April and still hasn't been received by all regions, Belle was announced in late August and no time soon will it get released.
I dont know what's happened to this great company. Using out of date services and softwares, delaying updates with features already in the market and most importantly zero customer service. Like I said, wake up Nokia cause times have change, you can no longer be in the market thinking that people use phones like N95. I had never considered having any other phone besides a Symbian phone but delaying Belle was the last straw. I defend Nokia here in the US where they decided to pull out 6 months ago but I have basically run out of facts and arguments to defend Nokia. I will forever be a Nokia fan and even though I am looking for another phone, the only two options are Nokia Lumia 800 or 710 becuase like I said above I am a loyal customer.

1. Many OS's have after all copied Nokia to start with, and considering Belle for symbian ^3 has not been officially released as yet, it hard to say exactly what will be included. Even those who have used the unofficial versions have said that it has changed 3 times now.
2.Nokia produce many more phone than any other manufacturer, which means if someone wants something that works like a phone they can buy it, if they want something that is more like a PC they can buy it also. Most other companies have a few phones and if they don't suit you then tough luck.
3.Much of the press have stated that symbian has been around since the beginning, and can't look beyond their own noses, to see how flexible symbian can be. After all this time Iphones with there so called revolutionary OS has only now received OTA updates.
4.Yes updates are good things, and yes they are offered as you said to fix bugs and to apply no features, however you still don't buy a phone in the beginning due to some feature that may or may not appear in a future update. You still buy the phone for what it currently does.Nobody knows the future!!! and for you to suggest otherwise is just purely ridiculous. Software updates are not mandatory, they, as YOU said, are OFFERED by the relevant company, you don't have to install the update and nor do companies HAVE to give you an update, they do give them because it makes economical sense for them to do so, having said that there will come a time when updates will NOT be offered for the particular phone or whatever.
5.Agreed I would like to see them develop it further.
6.The N9 does look a very nice phone, Not having used Meego however it is hard for me to say one way or the other. But I do think its silly to produce one phone with an OS and then just dump it, before its had a chance.
7.As far as Anna not being received by all regions, mostly this is purely a carrier issue.The carriers have said NO or just have not completed testing etc. I know Telstra Australia received Anna back in June/July and didn't agree to it until December, however other Australian network operators agreed much sooner. These kinds of issues with carriers cannot be controlled by Nokia. It certainly wouldn't surprise me after everyone on here complained about it not being released worldwide in one go, if nokia got all the approvals first then did a single release. I'm not saying this is what they are doing of course only that if they did it wouldn't surprise me.
Personally I have no issue with customer service at least not here in Australia with Nokia. Frankly judging by some peoples attitude on this forum, and I'm not pointing at anyone in particular, I have to wonder why they are here. I do belong to some other forums and honestly I have never seen people whinge and complain like they do on here, which I think is a real shame. These people don't seem to realize that this is a user forum, that happenes to be hosted on the nokia servers, designed to allow users to help other users. I feel quite sure if people made reasonable suggestions for products and services, instead of opening the same type of threads over and over again, then we would have more Nokia involvement in the forum and we could even have the opportunity to influence the powers to be, to include some of the things that we think are worthwhile. But hey its easier to whinge and complain than to use their brains to come up with something constructive.

FlexRIO update fpga simulation libraries error

I downgraded to ModelSim 6.5c to remain fully compatible with niFPGA. I am now trying to generate simulation VHDL files and need to update my FPGA simulation libraries. When I do so, I get the following error:
"An error occured while updating the FPGA simulation libraries. Make sure ModelSim is installed correctly and the files in the ModelSim directory are not read-only."
Not the most helpful of messages. ModelSim is installed correctly and runs. All files in all subdirectories have read/write permissions. What is labview looking for that it is not finding? Maybe that will help narrow down the issues I am having.
Thanks in advance.

Hello again manjagu.
There was a Corrective Action Request (CAR) filed regarding this sort of behavior however, it indicates that there should not be an issue with 6.5c and LabVIEW 2010 SP1. I am curious as to if the problem may be a result of an artifact left by the installation of version 10 or 6.6d. Did you uninstall these versions completely prior to installing version 6.5c? One thing that might possibly work to remedy this situation is to remove the ModelSim environment variable from your system as that seems to be related to the issue. For information on modifying environment variables in case you are unfamiliar with this process, please reference the article below.
How to Add, Remove or Edit Environment variables in Windows 7?
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Michael G.
Michael G.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments
Self-realization: I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, "... I drank what?"

Note edge / device and os update delays

Why is it verizon has not yet released the Note edge and all the other major companies have, making it Not possible to upgrade for the holidays? It makes it seem as though verizon has no faith in their tech support to handle issues regarding new devices or os updates ( aside from putting in bloatware) being they usually have one of the longest delays on releases. This phone was basically released over a month ago everywhere else and now their are talks about skipping android 5.0 to 5.0.1 which week probably take another lengthy delay after the phone is finally released. Is there going to bea release date anytime soon?

BigLefty if you don't like my post you are free not to read them. As tired as you are of my posts I'm tired of posts constantly asking about updates and when a certain phone will be available since it common knowledge no Verizon rep has that info nor would they hand it out if they did. Also tired of seeing threats of leaving if people don't get their way. If one is going to leave then do it. If I felt wronged by Verizon I wouldn't hesitate to leave, but I sure wouldn't be posting about it here I'd just do it and move on.

AT&T and Lumia Amber Update DELAYS and delivery ti...

1) AT&T customers who are also Lumia owners now know that AT&T missed the Nokia deadline for all Lumia phones receiving the Amber update by 9/30/2013.
2) Here is an AT&T Facebook session I had with Nicole L. yesterday. You will note their (AT&T's) best answer is we affirmatively will receive the update in a few weeks:
My post - "AT&T Decision Makers (particularly in AT&T Mobility),
Several hours ago we passed 9/30/2013. Over a month ago the Nokia Corporation published a statement (see http://conversations.nokia.com/2013/08/30/lumia-amber-your-questions-answered/ ) that Amber updates would roll-out world-wide by 9/30/2013.
Along the past month, queries to customer care reps and social media "managers" about the release date of Amber (and GDR2) were routinely met with condescending replies that we're (AT&T) working as quickly as possible, please be patient, stay tuned, updates can be challenging to implement properly, and so on.
Now, several thousand Lumia owners who are AT&T customers are left to ask two questions. The first requires only an affirmative or negative response, the second an actual calendar date.
1) Are Nokia Lumia owners who are AT&T customers going to receive via OTA the Amber (Pr2) and GDR2 updates?
2) If #1 is answered in the affirmative, then what exactly is the AT&T deadline for OTA availability? If answered in the negative, exactly why are your customers not going to receive a manufacturer certified equipment update?
Thank you for your prompt and concise reply."
AT&T's reply: "AT&T Affirmative, Michael. Our best answer is a few weeks. It's been a long road, but I hope you'll be happy with the update when it gets to your device. Thanks for your patience! - Nicole L. "
In a conversation I had with AT&T Customer Care rep "LaTonya", she was unable to confirm a timeframe. I made mention of the fact that when Apple sneezes AT&T gets a cold; however when Nokia speaks AT&T yawns. LaTonya enjoyed my observation.
Is there a way to press Nokia USA corporate into advocacy on our behalf?
Thanks!

Actually what it said was:
With Lumia Amber we expect to have the update arriving in all Lumia Windows Phone 8 phones by the end of September. Be patient – it’s coming!
So there is no deadline like you claim and Nokia would never make such claims. That said, you bought an ATT device made by Nokia and as such ATT is the company ultimately responsible for this. It is up to them to approve the update and allow it to be made available to their product(range).
Click on the blue Star Icon below if my advice has helped you or press the 'Accept As Solution' link if I solved your problem..

Update delayed problem

when i saving a material there is a problem arises that is update deley proble howe can i solve plz tell me experts

Hi.,
Contact your basis people,They will help you
Thanks & Regards
Narayana

Since last update, delays occur before response to keystrokes

There is a pause of half-second or more between pressing key and response appearing on screen. This makes scrolling down to desired bookmark, for example, very difficult if not impossible

I've noticed that there seems to be a few similar issues related to iTunes 10.3.1 recently.
I'm guessing that Apple stuffed up with this update.

App update delay breaks system

Has anyone resolved the issue of releasing an app which communicates with a server and then having the server be updated immediately while the app takes weeks to appear in the app store? It seems completely unreasonable to push app updates for larger app which are only a small part of a larger system and not have them immediately available. Most of the time updates cause breaking changes and therefore the app and the server side need to be updated simultaneously. This is impossible if app updates do not appear in the app store immediately. Anyone have any ideas?

Join the club .. I've been trying to log into the App store since Lion was released .. Keeps telling me "an unknown error has occured"
I have no problem logging into Itunes , this discussion group .. etc.. just CANNOT LOG INTO APP STORE...
have tried everything from reloading Snow Leopard . to all the terminal changes that others have suggested ...
guess it's time for a new Macbook Pro...
so weird...

Update delay simulating

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for