Upgrade issue in ECC6.0 for include structure

Hi All,
I have the following issue while upgrading to ecc6.0.
data:begin of it_cats,
        include structure cosp,
      end of it_cats.
I am geeting syntax error as include structure is not allowed in ecc6.0.What is the replacement for this?
Thanks.
Ramya.

Hallo There,
I read some of the already available posts on this topic but did not find any relevant answers so please excuse of the information already exists out there.
Here is the question:
Please consider the code (from above posts):
data:begin of it_cats.
       include structure cosp.
data: end of it_cats.
I read some where that this can  be replaced by  :
DATA it_cats type cosp.
Is this correct ?
http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/teaching/sap_r3/ABAP4/includ02.htm
Regards
SG

Similar Messages

  • Extended syntax check for include structure

    Hello Everyone,
    While declaring the internal table as:
    TYPES: BEGIN OF t_data.
            INCLUDE STRUCTURE mara.
    TYPES: END   OF t_data.
    DATA: it_data TYPE table of t_data.
    When performing extended check, i get following error:
    The current ABAP command is obsolete and problematic, especially so in ABAP
    Objects
    Within classes and interfaces, you can only use "TYPE" to refer to ABAP Dictionary
    types, not "LIKE" or "STRUCTURE".
    I am using 4.7 version.
    Any clue how to avoid this error during extended check.
    Regards,
    Tarun

    Tarun,
    With WAS 6.20 you should not declare internal tables with header line or using the old syntax as they are not compatible with OO ABAP.
    So, you either declare a TYPE the way you have done, in case you want additional fields apart from the INCLUDE structure, or declare the table directly like the way I have shown.
    Good thing, you can even specify the type of internal table that you want to create using this - STANDARD, SORTED, HASH. These tables will help you with the performance issues.
    regards,
    Ravi
    Note : Please mark the helpful answers

  • Plz help upgrade issue moving data from char type structure to non char typ

    Hi Experts
    plz help its very urgent
    Data :workout(5000) .
    FIELD-SYMBOLS : <FS_WORKOUT> TYPE ANY.  
    workout = '         u' .
    ASSIGN WORKOUT TO <FS_WORKOUT> CASTING TYPE C .
                      BAPISDITM = <FS_WORKOUT>.
    i am getting dump after BAPISDITM = <FS_WORKOUT>.
    i think i am getting the dump bcoz i am moving character type structure to non character type structure but i think with field symbols we can remove this issue thats y i used it but its not working plz help me
    its very urgent
    *dump is :*
    Short text
        Data objects in Unicode programs cannot be converted.
    What happened?
        Error in the ABAP Application Program
        The current ABAP program "ZSDR0009" had to be terminated because it has
        come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    How to correct the error
        Use only convertible operands "dst" and "src" for the statement
           "MOVE src TO dst"
        If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
        find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
        If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
        keywords:
        "UC_OBJECTS_NOT_CONVERTIBLE" " "
        "ZSDR0009" or "ZSDR0009_I02"
        "USER_COMMAND"
    thanx in advance

    i got d solution in this thread
    Hi all,
    data: gv_line(6000) type c.
    Bvbapkom = gv_line.
    But i am getting the Error like : gv_line and Bvbapkom are not mutually convertable.
    Note: Bvbapkom is a Structure
    How do i solve this ?
    Mahesh
    KR  
    Posts: 210
    Registered: 11/24/06
    Forum Points: 0 
      Re: gv_line and Bvbapkom are not mutually convertable.  
    Posted: Nov 30, 2007 8:40 AM    in response to: KR         Reply 
    Hi ,
    i got the solution
    ANSWER:
    Field-symbols: <X_Bvbapkom> type x,
    <X_gv_line> type x.
    Assign: Bvbapkom to <X_Bvbapkom> casting,
    gv_line to <X_gv_line> casting.
    <X_Bvbapkom> = <X_gv_line>.
    Nasaka Ramakris...  
    Posts: 4
    Registered: 1/19/08
    Forum Points: 20 
      Re: gv_line and Bvbapkom are not mutually convertable.   
    Posted: Jan 19, 2008 7:42 AM    in response to: KR         Reply 
    Hi Check this answer.
    ANSWER:
    Field-symbols: <X_Bvbapkom> type x,
    <X_gv_line> type x.
    Assign: Bvbapkom to <X_Bvbapkom> casting,
    gv_line to <X_gv_line> casting.
    <X_Bvbapkom> = <X_gv_line>.

  • Acrobat XI Pro Upgrade Issue Recognizing Serial Number for Acrobat X Pro

    I purchased Acrobat XI pro upgrade yesterday, was able to install, deactivate Acrobat X pro.  Now however, it is rejecting the serial number for Acrobat X pro and I can't use the program.  Please help!!

    Hi Stajascha1,
    We are sorry for the inconvenience.
    Can you please provide the exact message on the screen while you are trying to enter the serial number.
    If that is possible can you attach the screen shot of the error message. Make sure the serial number is not visible in screen shot.

  • Cannot activate modifications for table structure in SPDD during upgrade

    Hi, all.
    I am now trying to upgrade ECC5.0 to ERP6.0.
    In SPDD screen, some modifications which will be lost are found with yellow traffic signal.
    I have already tried to "adopt modifications", but the results can be categorized to 2 types.
    Type1: Table XXXX was activated with warning. (Some fields were inserted by us.)
      [Warning messages]
      ! Enhancement category for table missing.
      ! Enhancement category for include or subtype missing.
      ! Field ZXXXX does not lie within customer namespace.
      Table ZXXXX was activated with warning.
      Appended table XXXX is temporarily partially active.
    After clicking "back" button on Log display screen, " Adjustment of table XXXX can be completed".
    I clicked "back" and selected "No" in pop-up screen of "Reset to original", the row of the table became green check mark.
    However, when I checked "Versions" to compare "modif" and "active", the row of "modif" did not appear in "Versions of Object XXXX of Type Table Definition" screen, and seems that the modifications will be lost from "delta display" screen.
    Can you provide me the solution of this situation ?
    I guess these Tables in Type1 will be activated and the row of "modif" appear in "Versions" screen, if I could solve the warning, but I do not know how to do it.
    Type2: Modifications cannot be adopted to Table XXXX
      The table which will be changed in "General Attributes"
        -from "Not classified" to "Can be enhanced(character-type)"
        -from "Can be enhanced(character-type)" to "Can be enhanced(character-type or numeric)".
      I have chosen "Adopt modifications", then Phase2 with message "Proposal corresponds to current version" appeared.
    When I click "Back" and in pop-up screen which propose " Reset to original" I clicked "No", then the traffic signal was still yellow.
    How can I adopt modifications for this type ?
    Sorry for long question.
    Appreciate if you could answer above at least one of them soon.
    Best regards,
    Shin

    activate by enter the shadow system
    you can unlock the shadow system using sapup -unlockshd

  • Problem in activating include structure for VBAP

    hi ,
      i have to add 3 fields in an include structure  of vbap table.
    when i added and activated it ,it is showing 'partly active'.even the vbap table is becoming 'partly active'.
    zvxxvbap_include1 is the include strcuture .it is present in vbap table .
    plz tell me why it is showing as 'partly active'??
    regards
    pavan

    Hi Friend,
    Please do not use long name for include, make it short up to 6 chars. Check all data element had been activated of your Z include.
    Then try to activate again, read logs what taht is saying actually.
    Try in Extra -> Database Utility -> Adjust database and activate it.
    Hope it will help you.
    Regards
    Krishnendu

  • Error on extended check for types include structure statements

    Hi All ,
                  On Extended check im getting error :
    Program:  ZFIR_VALUATE_OBSOLETE_STOCK  Include:  ZFIR_VALUATE_OBSOLETE_STOCK_F  Row:   1205
    The current ABAP command is obsolete
    Within classes and interfaces, you can only use "TYPE" to refer to ABAP Dictionary
    types, not "LIKE" or "STRUCTURE".
    Internal Message Code: MESSAGE G/B
    (The message cannot be hidden using pseudo-comment "#EC .., bzw. durch SET
    EXTENDED CHECK OFF/ON)
    The error is in below line :
    TYPES: BEGIN OF t_fttax.
              INCLUDE STRUCTURE fttax.
      TYPES: END OF t_fttax.
    and fttax is a dictionary strucuture . i made internal table and work area using it .
    DATA: i_fttax TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF t_fttax,
            wa_fttax TYPE t_fttax.
    Need Help ,what i should do to remove this error ?
    Regards

    declare as :
    DATA: i_fttax TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF fttax,
               wa_fttax TYPE fttax.
    No need to declare as :
    TYPES: BEGIN OF t_fttax.
              INCLUDE STRUCTURE fttax.
      TYPES: END OF t_fttax.

  • Upgrade issues list needed

    Hi,
    We're currently on 4.6b and going to upgrade to ECC6 with unicode I'm trying to compile a list point taken care converting to unicode from ABAP technical point of view. Does anyone have such a list?
    Some points i shortlisted are :
    1) Use GUI_UPLOAD and GUI_DOWNLOAD rather than WS_UPLOAD and WS_DOWNLOAD.
    2) Structures or table headers that contain non-character data need to be identical when moving, comparing, selecting into, updating from, etc.
    3) OPEN DATASET filename IN TEXT MODE FOR INPUT ENCODING DEFAULT.
    I know there are others. Any help would be appreciated.
    aRs

    Check the below links
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=268386&highlight=upgrade+issues
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=263434&highlight=upgrade+issues
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=261051&highlight=upgrade+issues
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=253316&highlight=upgrade+issues

  • What is diff b/w Include Structure and Append Structure at Database Level

    Hi Experts,
    Could you please let me know what is the main difference between .Include Structure and .Append Structure at SE11?
    Thanks in advance and for good answer will give good points.
    Sekhar

    Hi,
    1. Append Structures
    Append structures can only be assigned to a single table.
    Append structures are created in the custome rnamespace ( ZZ or YY)
    In case of new versions of the standard table during upgrade, the append structures are automatically appended to the new version of the standard table
    Append structures can not be used with cluster and pool tables
    Append structures are created in transaction SE11. Display the standard table fields and press the Append structure button.
    When you press the button, SAP sugests a name for the new append structure. After you has accepted the name,
    a screen will be shown where you can enter the new fields.
    Remember to activate.
    2. Customizing Includes
    Some of the SAP standard tables contains special include statements called Customizing includes. In contrast to Append structures,
    Note that customizing includes are created by SAP, but the customer supply the fields for the include.
    Customizing includes begin with CI_ and is part of the customer namespace
    One Customizing include can be inserted into more than one table.
    You can find Customizing includes in SE11 under structures.
    Try to take a look at table RKPF which uses the Customizing include CI_COBL (In an IDES system). Next try to add a field to CI_COBL, and activate it. If you go back to table RKPF you will se that your new field has been added.
    Regards,
    Ferry Lianto

  • Inconsistency in the Dictionary for the structure "VXO2APPL"

    Hi gurus,
    I started with SP stack upgrade to 10(Install  SAP EHP1 for SAP NetWeaver 7.0  Stack 10 with Kernel 7.20).
    --First i did kernel upgrade from 701 patch 111 to 720 patch 105 which was successfull.
    --Now when i tried to upgrade the stack it gives me below error:
    Runtime Errors         DDIC_TYPE_INCONSISTENCY
    Date and Time          22.02.2012 14:16:39
    Short text
         Inconsistency in the Dictionary for the structure "VXO2APPL".
    What happened?
         Error in the SAP kernel.
         The current ABAP "SAPLSDOC" program had to be terminated because the
         ABAP processor detected an internal system error.
    Error analysis
         There is an internal system error.
         eliminated with ABAP/4.
    Trigger Location of Runtime Error
         Program                                 SAPLSDOC
         Include                                 LSVRXPIN
         Row                                     1.096
    **************************************************************************8
    I am able to login to the system in 000 client but when  i give any tcode i get this error....(i am only able to fire st22 and no other t code)
    Anyone who can help or has got the same problem earlier?
    Thanks
    Siddharth

    Hi Siddharth,
    Is Kernel upgrade to 720 really required for Support package stack upgrade ?
    because information clearly states "Error in the SAP kernel" rather i would suggest to upgrade your SAP system kernel to latest of 701 patch level 150
    Once you revert kernel to 701 , then try applying Support packages via client 000.
    Let us know results
    Regards,

  • RFBIBL00 Performance issues Post ECC6

    Hi Folks,
    Have just completed ECC6 upgrade am seeing terrible performance issues when using RFBIBL00 for loading. All loads seem to stick reading table TBIZU. DB Is oracle and table is quite small. Stats are valid and when checking explain plan in oracle the query seems to be fine.
    Anybody seen anything similar.
    ta

    hi,
    Please check this link
    [Re: rfbibl00;
    regards,
    suhas

  • Frustrating Phone Upgrade issue

    We need help with phone upgrade issue we encounter when BestBuy associate process our upgrade. Associate is saying we are not eligible but we have not done any phone upgrade since Jan 2011. Our ATT mobile service was established with BB in 2009 and we only upgraded 2 phones in Jan 2011 thru BB. The only recent change in January 2013 was a change of responsibility between my spouse and me since my company has a better employer discount thru ATT. No change and per ATT, no contract and we should be able to upgrade in any retail store. But BB keeps telling us we have issue with ATT and can do our upgrade only with ATT Corporate Store. Our mobile account is a regular family plan account as originally established with BB and just like any BB customer, have employer's discount attached. I don't understand how BB system communicates with ATT system so it is hard for me to explain to ATT what "error message" BB associate is receiving. It has become so frustrating with BestBuy telling us to check with ATT and then for ATT to tell us that there is no issue at their end. We have been a loyal BB customer with all major appliances bought from them including protection plan. The least they can do is work with their ATT representative to figure out between themselves what the issue is. Here we are willing to give both companies our business with new phones and new contracts and no one can help us out.

    LTGee -
    I am very sorry to hear about this. I am going to send you a Private Message to collect some information from you to see if we can get to the bottom of this. To check your private messages, ensure you are logged into the forum and click on the envelope on the upper right hand side of the forum.
    Thanks!
    Jesus|Senior Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
     Private Message

  • Difference between include structure and Append structure

    Could you please tell me
    I have bsis table and it contains append structure  in 4.7 SAP System.
    my program in 4.7 system contains internal table which used same structure of bsis table ( which contains additonal field in its append structure ).
    I need to have same table structure in 4.6 C because I am copying the same program into 4.6 system.
    As I could not append structure to bsis table in 4.6C SAP system,
    instead of that shall I add the field or Shall include the structure to run .
    What is the difference between Include structure and Append structure ( I forgot )
    How to achieve this please help me ?

    Hi ,
      As you know append structure can be used only once in table ,that to at last of all entries,
    Append structures are used for enhancements that are not included in the standard. This includes special developments, country versions and adding customer fields to any tables or structures.
    An append structure is a structure that is assigned to exactly one table or structure. There can be more than one append structure for a table or structure.
    The following enhancements can be made to a table or structure TAB with an append structure:
    Insert new fields in TAB,
    Define foreign keys for fields of TAB that already exist,
    Attach search helps to fields of TAB that already exist,
    These enhancements are part of the append structure, i.e. they must always be changed and transported with the append structure.
    When a table or structure is activated, all the append structures of the table are searched and the fields of these append structures are added to the table or structure. Foreign keys and search help attachments added using the append structure are also added to the table. If an append structure is created or changed, the table or structure assigned to it is also adjusted to these changes when the append structure is activated.
    Since the order of the fields in the ABAP Dictionary can differ from the order of the fields on the database, adding append structures or inserting fields in such append structures does not result in a table conversion.
    The customer creates append structures in the customer namespace. The append structure is thus protected against overwriting during an upgrade. The fields in the append structure should also reside in the customer namespace, that is the field names should begin with ZZ or YY. This prevents name conflicts with fields inserted in the table by SAP.
    The new versions of the standard tables are imported after an upgrade, and the fields, foreign key definitions and search help attachments contained in the append structures are added to the new standard tables at activation.
    A standard table contains the fields Field 1, Field 2 and Field 3. An append structure containing the fields ZZA and ZZB is defined for this table. After activating the table, the corresponding database table contains fields Field 1, Field 2, Field 3, ZZA and ZZB.
    Further Remarks:
    An append structure can only be assigned to exactly one table or structure. If you want to append the same fields to several tables or structures, you can store these fields in an include structure. In this case you must create an append structure for each of these tables or structures and include the include structure there.
    Adding an append structure to an SAP standard table is supported by the  Modification Assistant.
    If you want to insert a field that is to be delivered with the R/3 standard in the next Release in the customer system in advance, you must include it in the table itself as a repair. If you include such a field in an append structure for the table, it will occur twice when the new standard table is imported. This will result in an activation error.
    No append structures may be added to tables with long fields (data types VARC, LCHR or LRAW). This is because a long field must always be the last field in the table. However, structures with long fields can be enhanced with append structures.
    If a table or structure with an append structure is copied, the fields of the append structure become fields of the target table. Foreign key definitions and search help attachments appended with the append structure are copied to the target table.
    Foreign keys for the appended fields must be defined within the append structure. Fields of the table or structure assigned to the append structure may be defined when assigning the key field and foreign key field.
    Indexes on the appended fields must be defined in the original table.
    A table or structure TAB can only be enhanced with new foreign keys or search help attachments using an append structure. You therefore cannot change an existing foreign key definition or search help attachment for a field of TAB with the append structure.
    Thanks
    Manju

  • Is Customising Include and Include structures same?

    Hi,
    Could any one tell me
    whether
    Is Customising Include and Include structures same?

    hi,
    Structures can be included in tables or other structures to avoid redundant structure definitions.
    A table may only be included as an entire table.
    A chain of includes may only contain one database table. The table in which you are including belongs to the include chain. This means that you may not include a transparent table in a transparent table.
    Includes may contain further includes.
    Foreign key definitions are generally imparted from the include to the including table. The attributes of the foreign key definition are passed from the include to the including table so that the foreign key depends on the definition in the include.
    Append structures are used for enhancements that are not included in the standard. This includes special developments, country versions and adding customer fields to any tables or structures.
    An append structure is a structure that is assigned to exactly one table or structure. There can be more than one append structure for a table or structure.
    The following enhancements can be made to a table or structure TAB with an append structure:
    ·        Insert new fields in TAB,
    ·        Define foreign keys for fields of TAB that already exist,
    ·        Attach search helps to fields of TAB that already exist,
    These enhancements are part of the append structure, i.e. they must always be changed and transported with the append structure.
    When a table or structure is activated, all the append structures of the table are searched and the fields of these append structures are added to the table or structure. Foreign keys and search help attachments added using the append structure are also added to the table. If an append structure is created or changed, the table or structure assigned to it is also adjusted to these changes when the append structure is activated.
    Since the order of the fields in the ABAP Dictionary can differ from the order of the fields on the database, adding append structures or inserting fields in such append structures does not result in a table conversion.
    The customer creates append structures in the customer namespace. The append structure is thus protected against overwriting during an upgrade. The fields in the append structure should also reside in the customer namespace, that is the field names should begin with ZZ or YY. This prevents name conflicts with fields inserted in the table by SAP.
    A Customizing include is a structure that satisfies a special naming convention. The name of a Customizing include begins with ‘CI_’ and the include is in the customer namespace.
    If enhancements are already planned in the standard using customer-specific fields, such Customizing includes are included. in the corresponding standard table or standard structure. The Customizing include (that is the definition of the structure itself) is usually first created in the customer system and filled with fields by special Customizing transactions.
    Customers can thus enhance tables and structures of the standard system without themselves having to modify the table and structure definitions. This means that these enhancements will not be lost when upgrading. If a table or structure of the standard system is enhanced with customer fields using a Customizing include, these customer fields are automatically inserted in the new delivered table or structure definition during an upgrade.
    If you create a Customizing include for a table or structure, only those enhancements are allowed that are consistent with the enhancement category of the enhanced table or structure. For more information, see Structure Enhancements.
    Customers can but need not create a Customizing include and fill it with fields. If there is no Customizing include, there is no error message when the table or structure including it is activated.
    A Customizing include can be contained in several tables or structures, so that they remain consistent when the include is modified.
    Hope this helps. Do reward.
    Edited by: Runal Singh on Mar 19, 2008 2:39 PM

  • Upgrade issues OBIEE 10g to 11g along with OBIA upgrade

    Hi,
    I have to upgrade OBIEE 10.1.3.4.1 to OBIEE 11.1.1.5 along with OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5(Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1) at my client location and I have very little knowledge on it. and want to know/have help documents for upgrade.
    And if anyone in the forums involved in upgrade please list the errors/issues occured during upgrade and after upgrade.
    1. OBIEE 10g to 11g upgrade issues??
    2. OBIA OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5 upgrade issues along with 10g to 11g??
    3. Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1 upgrade issues??
    4. DAC upgrade issues??
    any response for my questions is appreciated.
    Thanks
    Jay.
    Edited by: Jay on Apr 11, 2012 9:11 AM

    HI Jay,
    We cannot explained thread list here, If you get any errors plz post me,will try to help out.
    This is oracle document link - This document has given step by step with screen shots upgration for 10g to 11g ,Please refer the below link.
    http://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/obe/fmw/bi/bi11115/upgrade/upgrade_to_11g.htm
    http://obieemanu.blogspot.in/2011/05/rpd-upgration-from-10g-to-11g.html
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/upgrade.1111/e10125/ua_command_line.htm#ASMAS149
    Award points it is useful.
    Thanks,
    satya

Maybe you are looking for

  • SMS_SRS_REPORTING_POINT - Error retrieving folders with SCCM 2012 and SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2

    Hi: According to all the Reporting Services logs my Reporting Point was setup correctly.  When I try and run any report I see the entries below in the srsrp.log on the SQL Server.  The report names show up in the Console but when I right any of the l

  • Quicktime does not play audio

    I've found that since upgrading to Lion, that some .mov files do not play the audio soundtrack when you play them in Quicktime 10.1. Audio is fine in Quicktime Player 7 Is this a bug with Lion?

  • Query problem  in viewobject wizard

    I have problem to viewobject creation In the sql Query of viewobject wizard, I can not use build-in sql function like trunc, nvl to the attribute if I use function, there is no problem with query test(query is valid). However when I click ok or apply

  • Hyper-V Failover Cluster virtual guests suddenly reboots

    The environment is Server 2012 R2 using dual clusters--a Hyper-V Failover Cluster running guest application virtual machines and a Scale-Out File Server Cluster using Tiered Storage Spaces which are used to supply SMB3 shares for Quorum and CSV. Has

  • 2 iCloud iPhone accounts to 1 iPhoto photostream library not possible?

    I feel I'm not getting the full iCloud photostreaming experience i should be. My spouse and I have our iphone 5's. We have a shared iTunes account which is perfect for us (we have the same calendar and contacts and events, music etc). But, we each ha