Upgrade part of package with aur

Hi list!
The texlive-latexextra package is outdated (I've flagged it) because the exsheets package is updated (with a new features!). I want a simple version or maybe git-version. I think it should be an AUR package but how can I handle the file-conflicts? I don't want overwrite exsheets.sty and I think it isn't good solution.
Is there any solution?

So your proposed exsheets-git would conflict with texlive-latexextra (and it should be in the conflicts array).  So you could not have them both properly installed at the same time.  If you want the newest exsheets, you could make a aur package with all the newest components of texlive-latexextra.  Then it could conflict with and provide that package, so you'd install your new one and remove the other.
This would be even easier than making a brand new aur package as you could just get the current PKGBUILD from the ABS and modify the exsheets source url.

Similar Messages

  • My photoshop has turned into a 30 day trial after upgrading my account to a package with lightroom included!? what is going on?

    I have been subscribed to a Photoshop CC only package since 2013, and a friend of mine pointed out that i was paying too much, and i should at least have Lightroom included. So i checked it out, asked some questions at the (Probably a bot) chat service, before i knew it there it was, my option to upgrade to a package with photoshop and Lightroom (Bridge included) 
    it was time to update my existing bridge and photoshop. After doing this, all of a sudden my photoshop has changed into a 30 day trial! how do i fix this?

    FIXED! I have re entered the chat, with the hope of fixing it with someone there, and we fixed it!

  • Slow connection after 2nd latest upgrade with AUR 8192cu-dkms package

    I have a wireless network connection with a "EDUP Ultra-Mini Nano USB 2.0 802.11n 150Mbps Wifi/WLAN Wireless Network Adapter", witch has the rtl8192cu chippset.
    From the start I have hade problems with lag, droped packages and slow connection with the original rtl8192cu package. So after a while I installed the 8192cu-dkms package from AUR and it worked prefectly. Before I would just reach speed at between 5 to 60 KB/sec, but after I installed the package I would reach the maximum of ca 800 KB/sec.
    After the next to last kernel upgrade (I think it was linux 3.17.3-1-ARCH or 3.16.???-ARCH) the speed droped back down to 15 to 100 KB/sec and it stared to lag. (And yes, I reinstalled 8192cu-dkms everytime I upgraded the kernel.) And the original drivers are still loosing more packages and have slower speed then 8192cu-dkms.
    I have other computers on the same network and they allways reach ca 800 KB/sec and I have tried diffirent router settings and I am certain that the problem is with my drivers.
    I use wifi-menu to connect to my network, since wpa_supplicant apperantly dosen't work with 8192cu-dkms.
    I have tried reinstalling them with no improved results. And I am out of ideas.
    Any one have the same problem or a solution?
    Is it a good or bad idea to downgrade to the last kernel version were it worked?

    This is basically my experience with every Realtek wireless chipset I have ever used on Linux.  Honeslty, if you have the means, get something else.  Realtek does a pretty shitty job writing and maintaining their Linux drivers.
    Edit: See this thread for another user's awesome experience of a recent Realtek wireless chipset.
    When I was struggling with a rtl8192ce a while back, I remember that there were a few module options that made it run slightly better.  This was basically just to set it to use software encryption, and turn off any and all low power states.
    Last edited by WonderWoofy (2014-12-13 23:58:09)

  • [SOLVED] How to install AUR packages with patchname.patch

    Hi all,
    I'm trying to install lottanzb from the AUR and there's are a dependency called par2cmdline 0.4-13 that has a lot of nameofpatch.patch that are included in the AUR par2cmdline 0.4-13 package page that just open up to a url that shows code.
    I created patch files from the code displayed in the url with a text editor and added them to the extracted LOTTANZB folder in my build directory but when I go to build the package with PKGBUILD it runs through a check sum while building and the checks don't match.
    I'm obviously doing something fundamentally wrong here. Can someone direct me?
    Thanks,
    Last edited by bennylb0 (2010-05-28 13:30:16)

    Hi, thanks for reply.
    Sorry, my mistake.
    I did place patch files inside the par2cmdline-0.4 folder. The only reason I created the .patch files and placed them inside par2cmdline-0.4 folder was because the PKGBUILD as well as the other 5 .patch files didn't exist inside the extracted build folder. They only place I could find them was in AUR par2cmdline-0.4 displayed as a url.
    When I copied and created the PKGBUILD as it did not exist inside the extracted folder par2cmdline-0.4 folder I received the following error:- 
    Error autoconf.patch was not found in the build directory and is not a url. That along with 4 others do not exist in the build directory.
    You can see this bellow:-
    [ben@ben par2cmdline-0.4]$ makepkg
    ==> Making package: par2cmdline 0.4-13 i686 (Fri May 28 22:08:21 EST 2010)
    ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies...
    ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies...
    ==> Retrieving Sources...
      -> Downloading par2cmdline-0.4.tar.gz...
    --2010-05-28 22:08:23--  http://downloads.sourceforge.net/source … 0.4.tar.gz
    Resolving downloads.sourceforge.net... 216.34.181.59
    Connecting to downloads.sourceforge.net|216.34.181.59|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently
    Location: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/projec … 0.4.tar.gz [following]
    --2010-05-28 22:08:23--  http://downloads.sourceforge.net/projec … 0.4.tar.gz
    Reusing existing connection to downloads.sourceforge.net:80.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
    Location: http://transact.dl.sourceforge.net/proj … 0.4.tar.gz [following]
    --2010-05-28 22:08:24--  http://transact.dl.sourceforge.net/proj … 0.4.tar.gz
    Resolving transact.dl.sourceforge.net... 202.55.147.10
    Connecting to transact.dl.sourceforge.net|202.55.147.10|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 239312 (234K) [application/x-gzip]
    Saving to: "par2cmdline-0.4.tar.gz.part"
    100%[===================================================>] 239,312      179K/s   in 1.3s   
    2010-05-28 22:08:26 (179 KB/s) - "par2cmdline-0.4.tar.gz.part" saved [239312/239312]
    ==> ERROR: par2cmdline-0.4-autoconf.patch was not found in the build directory and is not a URL.

  • I just upgraded my iMac to Lion, and a few seconds ago, I upgraded the iWork package and now I'm having some problems with the new version of Pages (4.1) When I try to change something in a document, a message says "the program is not responding"

    I just upgraded my iMac to Lion, and a few seconds ago, I upgraded the iWork package and now I'm having some problems with the new version of Pages (4.1) When I try to change something in a document, a message says "the program is not responding", so I have to force it to close. By the way, the SAVE botton stays the same even I change erverything in my document. Please, a have a work to finish, **** me. What I can do abou it?

    I just upgraded my iMac to Lion, and a few seconds ago, I upgraded the iWork package and now I'm having some problems with the new version of Pages (4.1) When I try to change something in a document, a message says "the program is not responding", so I have to force it to close. By the way, the SAVE botton stays the same even I change erverything in my document. Please, a have a work to finish, **** me. What I can do abou it?

  • How to include an enhancement package with upgrade without Solution Manager

    Hello,
    I have been trying to do an upgrade from SAP R3 46C to ERP6 in my sandbox.  I want to include Enhancment package 3 with the upgrade.  I have tried using the Solution Manager to download the Enhancement package and it work fine except that it did not create the XML Stack configuration file that the upgrade is looking for.  Therefore I downloaded the DVD for Enhancement package 3 and included that in the mounted CDs in the PREPARE portion of the upgrade and it does not recognize it.
    Now for my question, is there a way to include the Enhancement package with the upgrade without using Solution Manager? If so, could someone please let me know where to find the information or share the procedure with me?
    Thank you in advance,
    Ron

    The EPs are just like support packages (optional); if the upgrade is not letting you put it during upgrade then just do it once the upgrade is completed.

  • I have PS 4,5,and 6 installed on my Macbook Pro as well as Lightroom 4 and 5. Can I remove PS 4 and 5 and LR 4?  PS 4 is the total install and PS 5 and 6 are upgrades. LR 4 is the full package with LR an upgrade.

    I have PS 4,5,and 6 installed on my Macbook Pro as well as Lightroom 4 and 5. Can I remove PS 4 and 5 and LR 4? PS 4 is the total install and PS 5 and 6 are upgrades. LR 4 is the full package with LR an upgrade.
    I need space!

    First let me disabuse of a misconception:  All Adobe upgrades are FULL installers.  Whether you buy them as upgrades or new versions does not make an iota of difference.  The upgrade installers do not need to find a prior version installed, they just prompt you for the old serial number as well as the old one, and they do not rely on the old version in the least.
    Second, the time to uninstall an older version is BEFORE upgrading to a newer one.  Otherwise, the uninstaller from the older versions will mess up with your new install.  There are a gazillion files that are named the same and in the same locations as the new one.
    Your best bet now is to uninstall ALL the Photoshop versions you have installed, including the newest one, one by one, then run the Adobe CS Cleaner Tool, then run Repair Permissions from Apple's Desk Utility, and finally re-install the latest version.
    The other alternative, if your boot HD is large enough (very doubtful in case of a laptop like a Mac Book), is to leave all versions on it.
    Your choice.

  • I am a student who subscribed to the 9.99 photography package, I didn't realize there was a discount for students.  I would like to upgrade to the full package with the student discount.  I can not find the option for this. How do I do this?

    I am a student who subscribed to the 9.99 photography package, I didn't realize there was a discount for students.  I would like to upgrade to the full package with the student discount.  I can not find the option for this. How do I do this?

    Hi Djmontanalv,
    Please go through the link below.
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/cancel-membership-subscription.html
    Regards,
    Anand

  • Upgrading linux-lqx with Aura

    Hi,
    I'm running into an issue upgrading linux-lqx with Aura..... please bare in mind though that I've just started using Aura so outside of simple pacman style commands I'm quite unfamiliar with it's more in-depth or advanced usage.
    Basically the issue I'm running into is this:
    patching file sound/usb/6fire/midi.h
    patching file sound/usb/6fire/pcm.c
    patching file sound/usb/6fire/pcm.h
    patching file sound/usb/endpoint.c
    patching file sound/usb/misc/ua101.c
    patching file sound/usb/mixer.c
    patching file sound/usb/usx2y/usbusx2yaudio.c
    patching file tools/hv/hv_kvp_daemon.c
    patching file tools/perf/config/utilities.mak
    HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
    HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o
    SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c
    SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.lex.c
    SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.hash.c
    HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o
    HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
    scripts/kconfig/conf --silentoldconfig Kconfig
    * Restart config...
    * DOS/FAT/NT Filesystems
    MSDOS fs support (MSDOS_FS) [M/n/y/?] m
    VFAT (Windows-95) fs support (VFAT_FS) [M/n/y/?] m
    Default codepage for FAT (FAT_DEFAULT_CODEPAGE) [437] 437
    Default iocharset for FAT (FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET) [utf8] utf8
    exFAT filesystem support (EXFAT_FS) [N/m/y/?] (NEW) aborted!
    Console input/output is redirected. Run 'make oldconfig' to update configuration.
    SYSHDR arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h
    SYSHDR arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h
    SYSHDR arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_x32.h
    SYSTBL arch/x86/syscalls/../include/generated/asm/syscalls_32.h
    HOSTCC arch/x86/tools/relocs_32.o
    HOSTCC arch/x86/tools/relocs_64.o
    HOSTCC arch/x86/tools/relocs_common.o
    HOSTLD arch/x86/tools/relocs
    aura >>= Would you like to continue anyway? [Y/n] y
    I've checked the PKGBUILD in /var/cache/aura/pkgbuilds and everything looks fine....
    why is the input/output getting redirected and how do I solve this issue??
    It seems to me that there are some new options which aren't in the previously configured pkgconfig, if this is the case how do I select the new options?
    Of course I can build linux-lqx manually as I have done initially however, I would like to use Aura as it makes life much easier :-)
    Thanks.

    Using "makepkg" works no problem like I explained previously.... but that means manual download of the tar.gz file then compile and install.
    I was really hoping for Aura to automate things to make life "sightly easier".
    Aura is pretty good with everything else, including install/upgrade but just getting this to work.... if not then fine no worries but would be nice if it did work :-)
    Last edited by JohnnySSH (2013-09-07 13:51:01)

  • [SOLVED]Weird conflict with official packages and aur packages

    Hi. I have enchant-zemberek installed on my system. It is my package that i'm maintaining at AUR. Yesterday i tried to install poedit which depends on enchant. Weirdly altoguh enchant-zemberek provides enchant; pacman tried to remove enchant-zemberek and instead install enchant. Otherwise it won't let me install poedit. I have updated enchant-zemberek PKGBUILD and pacman let me install poedit without forcing me to install enchant. Here is what i have in my first PKGBUILD before update:
    replaces=("enchant")
    provides=("enchant")
    conflicts=('enchant')
    And after updating;
    replaces=("enchant=${pkgver}")
    provides=("enchant=${pkgver}")
    conflicts=('enchant')
    Now, i'm wondering while an AUR package have different package name than the official one why pacman tries to replace it? Why PKGBUILD needs package version in provides tag? Say, if i want to keep my own my-abc-1.0-1.i686.pkg.tar.xz but official package abc-1.1-1.i686.pkg.tar.xz released; must i keep my package only in Ignores array? Should i report this as a bug?
    Last edited by tarakbumba (2011-04-07 09:52:41)

    No, its not a bug. poedit depends on gtkspell which depends on enchant>=1.5.0 - your original custom enchant package did not provide any specific version of enchant, so pacman pulled in the repo package instead to satisfy the versioned dependency. As you have built your package with replaces=enchant, pacman also honours that.

  • Craete AUR package with no url in PKGBUILD ?

    Hi.
    I am trying to create a package for AUR.
    The package is just a script installed to /usr/local/bin
    it has no url as the script is included (as source)
    how can I create a package with no 'url' - when I try to upload to AUR is says I needed a url section
    I created one with
    url=()
    but then I get (when submitting package)
    'Package URL is missing a protocol (ie. http:// ,ftp://)'
    Can anyone help upload an AUR package (with no ur) ?
    Cheers !

    Just open a thread here for the package and link it in the PKGBUILD, like this package:
    https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41689
    UPDATE - Sorry, not that one, that is recursive
    This one is a better example:
    https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32483
    Last edited by SanskritFritz (2011-11-12 20:12:28)

  • Config Manager 2012 client upgrade (via package with batch commands)

    Hello all,
    I would like to kindly ask for your help with my question regarding a SCCM 2012 R2 client upgrade (from RTM to R2)
    Recently, we have upgraded from RTM version of SCCM2012 to R2 (with the PXE hotfix applied)
    During the process, I have choose not to upgrade clients when the SP1 was applied and go straight for the R2, which is not a problem I believe. 
    My question is regarding the pre-created packages, that are showing up in the console. I believe, that they are the easiest way to upgrade clients via packages in SCCM. (we can't push the installation due network policy)
    This hotfix is stored here: \\"FQDN_site_server"\SMS_TSP\hotfix\KB2905002\Client\x64    (in case of x64 version, x86 is the same but x86 in the end)
    The executed file from this path is this with this command following: 
    msiexec.exe /p configmgr2012ac-r2-kb2905002-x64.msp /L*v %TEMP%\configmgr2012ac-r2-kb2905002-x64.msp.LOG /q REINSTALL=ALL REINSTALLMODE=mous
    Anyway, when we install the clients when we deploy it for the first on a machine, that has no client or we reinstall it, we do it with help of this batch command:
    set curdir=%~dp0
    %curdir%ccmsetup.exe SMSSITECODE=TSP /NoCRLCheck /UsePKIcert /forceinstall SMSMP=HTTPS://CML.LTSPRAGUE.CZ CCMHOSTNAME=CML.LTSPRAGUE.CZ
    I just need to know, if I can use the prepared package from the console in our case and if it will keep the settings when the package is deployed.
    I belive I have found a similar questin here on the forums:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/c9b40687-1843-44c7-b61b-fd26d53ab90b/cumulative-update-3-and-agent-upgrade?forum=configmanagerdeployment
    The second answer might the answer I'm looking for, but can you explain that to me like I'm five years old? :)
    Please, let me know.
    The IT guys from LukOIL

    I'm not sure, because of my short time at  the company, but there are historical security reasons for setting the push installation off. 
    Second reason are strict firewall rules used here. SCCM Agent may contact site server through HTTPS - that is a one way communication, so push installation isn't possible.
    Don't mix "client push" and "automatic client update". See
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgr_geek_speak/archive/2013/09/09/using-configuration-manager-automatic-client-upgrade-to-upgrade-to-the-latest-system-center-endpoint-protection-client.aspx for further details. (And yes, the article talks about SCEP, but
    it also tells details about the entire process)
    Torsten Meringer | http://www.mssccmfaq.de
    Thank you for the article and your, but I find it easier to deploy packages right now.
    I have found out, that there is a folder named "ClientUpgrade" in ConfigMgr installation folder.
    I used this and made a package out of it. Deployment went fine as well as the installation of the upgrade for the client, but there is a problem now, that I don't see any software in the "Software Center" in "Available Software" - and there should be, since
    I have may SW pointed to me and the list was populated before I have done the upgrade to the new version.
    This may be a simple problem, but I really don't know what's wrong.
    The IT guys from LukOIL

  • I have tried to download premiere elements 12 twice now and all i get is the "read me" part. I bought the package with  elements 12.

    I bought premiere 12 in a package with elements 12 and can only download the "read me" and not the premiere programme itself...What is the problem...It said the download was successful but it bwas not. Elements 12 is OK and works fine but not Premiere 12.

    Try downloading the offline installer(s) from http://prodesigntools.com/photoshop-elements-12-direct-download-links-premiere.html
    Make sure you follow the Very Important Instructions on that page.

  • CS5 upgrade says on packaging that CS5 Design Standard is a qualifying product, but the installer will not complete the upgrade. How do I get the the installer to complete the upgrade?

    When I enter the license key for a CS5 Design Standard Upgrade on a Mac with CS5 Design Standard installed and licensed, the installer says that there are no qualifying products installed to be upgraded.
    The packing for the upgrade states that CS5 Design Standard is a qualifying product. How to I get the upgrade to install?

    It does seem rather like that. However, the box copy of CS5DS Upg that I am holding also states that "you must have one of the following: Adobe Creative Suite 5 - Design Standard" on the packaging.
    If I am trying to upgrade CS5DS with CS5DS, it is partly because Adobe is suggesting that it makes sense to upgrade to an identical product. Hence my confusion when the install failed.

  • [SOLVED] Building VCS packages from AUR fails

    Hello,
    Whenever I try to build a git or svn package from AUR, build fails with the error in a clean chroot enviroment:
    ==> ERROR: Unknown download protocol: svn
    Aborting...
    When the build starts, makepkg actually downloads source files properly. Any clues?
    Last edited by yuan_modu (2015-04-02 16:31:03)

    Trilby wrote:How many packages has this happened with?  Can you give an example of one that produces this error?  If the download proceeds when the build starts, it sounds like the PKGBUILD is outdated and is manually grabbing the source in the build function (in pacman<4.0 style).
    I was building https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/uefi-shell-svn: a popular and up-to-date PKGBUILD.
    Indeed I didn't merge the conf files of  clean chroot. There was a makepkg.conf.pacnew, the lacking part in my old makepkg.conf was:
    VCSCLIENTS=('bzr::bzr'
    'git::git'
    'hg::mercurial'
    'svn::subversion')
    and some small changes. Everything works fine now. Was my bad. Sorry for incovenience and thanks for your help.
    Last edited by yuan_modu (2015-04-02 13:08:21)

Maybe you are looking for