URLs (ports) are being stripped by 10gAS?

Hi,
We are having a problem with a 10gAS installation. In general most everything is working, but it looks like in some cases, when we connect to it using a URL that ends without an ending slash ("/"), OAS is redirecting the browser to a different URL with an ending slash. The problem is that the redirect URL is missing the port.
For example, if I point my browser to http://<host>:7777/oiddas (URL with no ending slash), OAS is sending a 301/redirect to http://<host>/oiddas/ (URL with ending slash, but with port missing). From what we can tell, it looks like OAS is trying to redirect the browser to port 80.
The "oiddas" is where we mainly encountered the problem, but there may be others.
I've been researching this problem, but haven't had any success. The only thing that I've found that's close is is to set the "ServerName" in the Apache httpd.conf to the fully-qualifed domain name (apparently, Apache uses this to build the URL for redirect). However, I checked, and "ServerName" is set to the FQDN in our httpd.conf, so that doesn't seem to be the problem.
Has anyone else run across this problem before? If so, any suggestions as to how to fix the problem?
Thanks,
Jim

Hi,
Comments interspersed...
We are having a problem with a 10gAS installation.
Which 10g version? And platform?I'll check tomorrow re. version. This is actually an Ebusiness 11i installation, with the infrastructure running under 10gAS (per Metalink article). Platform is Solaris 9 SPARC.
The problem is that the redirect URL is missing the port.
How did you find that out?When we use IE, if we go to http://<host>:7777/oiddas, we get a "no server or DNS" error, and the address bar shows http://<host>/oiddas.
Similar thing happens with Netscape 7, if we go to http://<host>:7777/oiddas, we get a popup saying "connection refused by <host>" (i.e., not by <host>:7777).
Did you look around in the installActions.log? E.g. for the config tools parameters
# grep apacheport= installActions<datetime of infra install>.logI will pass the above along to the person who did the installation, or check on it myself, but FYI, the Listen and Port directives in the infrastructure Apache httpd.conf is set to 7777. Is a port setting stored somewhere in the configs other than that?
Does SSO login work? http://<host>:7777/pls/orasso
Yes, I think that part works.
Jim

Similar Messages

Invalid URL's are being resolved

I am running a 10.3.4 Weblogic Server. Currently invalid URL's are being resolved by the generic call to the Service.
For instance: If I wanted to call our logging service I would use the following URL:
http://<hostname>:port/LoggingService
If I entered a bad URL like
http://<hostname>:port/BLAH
I would expect to get a HTTP 404 error or some equivalent. Instead the Logging Service is resolving the invalid URL and returning the default page for the Logging Service.
The same problem happens at another level:
http://<hostname>:port/ReportService/ReportService (is proper)
http://<hostname>:port/ReportService/BLAH (should be BAD but is returning the default ReportService.
Any ideas what is causing this?

I am just using the browser to access it. I don't believe there is caching or the URL being changed.
So, when you access just the Web Service it brings up a page with information. I'm not quite sure what to call it but this is what it looks like:
Web Services
Endpoint                                                                      Information
Service Name: {http://..../loggingservice} LoggingService                     Address http://xdabi004:10013/LoggingService
Port Name:    {http://..../loggingservice} LoggingServicePort                 WSDL:   http://xdabi004:10013/LoggingService?wsdl
                                                                              Implementation class: ss.services.SSCSJN_LoggingService -----
I had to use the code element ot get it to display correctly.
Another somewhat related issue is that we have some EJB's that are referenced like
http://xdabi004:10013/DataService/DataService
and others like
http://xdabi004:10013/RequestService
This is related to the original problem since most of the Services are 2 levels deep (DataService/DataService). Since the LoggingService is only one level deep, URL's like http:/xdabi004:10013/BLAH are getting resolved.
Thanks for the help.

How do i find what ports are being used.

I need to know how to tell what ports are being used and by what. I recently bought Apple Remote Desktop and have been pretty impressed but I have one computer here that won't let me Observe or Control. I think it is because the G4 in question has a program using port 5900. I need to confirm this is there any way that I can see if this port is being used?
Thanks
Moderith

Hi Moderith--
Welcome to the Apple Discussions.
Look in your Utilities folder for the Network Utility program. Open it, and choose "Port Scan" from the row of tabs in its window. If you're not running Network Utility on the problematic G4, use the G4's IP address. But if you're actually on the G4, use "localhost".
Note that if you check the open ports on the G4 from another computer, you won't see as many as if you check it from the G4 itself. That's because some ports are only local. For example, I have enabled the mail server on my Macs, but only to deliver mail, not relay it. So if I do a port scan using "localhost", I see port 25 open, but it's not open from another computer.
charlie

Ports are being block (not responding)

Ports are being block (not responding), port forwarding is configured on the router and firewall is turned off on the server (osx 10.8). Am I missing anything?
Server has a static IP which I forwarded to ports to
I'm setting up VPN server and need ports 500, 1701, 1723, 4500 open
Thanks
-Allen

Depending on the exact set-up of the network, L2TP requires UDP ports 500, 1701 and 4500 and the IP-ESP protocol, which is IP protocol 50; ESP.
Other than ESP (which is protocol 50 and not port 50), these are UDP ports, and not TCP.
TCP 1723 is used for PPTP. Not L2TP.
It is common for L2TP passthrough to fail when more than one connection is active.
As compared with L2TP, PPTP is usually easier to get going around NAT. Though conversely, L2TP is rather more secure than PPTP.
Check your Mac OS X Server firewall settings, too. If you have some outboard network device providing a NAT gateway, try dropping the server firewall.
Use of an external firewall-gateway with an embedded VPN server is something I've variously recommended, too. (I find that VPN NAT passthrough is something best avoided, as VPNs and NAT are operating at crossed purposes. VPNs seek to keep connection end-points known, while NAT tries to hide those connection end-points. Doing the VPN processing on the Internet side of the NAT is just... well, easier.)
Also ensure that your ISP is not blocking VPN connections. While you might be on static IP, confirm the ports are open. Trust, but verify. Get yourself a UDP port scanner, and have a look.
If it's permissible within your ISP service tier (and depending on what protocols you're testing), probe the specific target ports using telnet or the openssl s_client command and (particularly for this case) the nc (netcat) tools, and see if the ports allow access. nc can run port probes on UDP, which is the key piece here given telnet and s_client target TCP and TCP SSL connections. Probably something like the nc -zu w.x.y.z udp-port command.

TS3276 attachments are being stripped

Recently attachments are being stripped from incoming email messages. If I open the same message on my Blackberry PlayBook all the attachments are there. I have even had the sender resend the email and the same attachments come through fine on the second attempt. Nothing about the account or mail settings have changed that I'm aware of and the problem seems very random.

My wife texted me this morning and said my texts to her Blackberry are coming up with weird looking text and it has 15 attachments added to it. So weird because it's a brand new text message (not carried over from a previous one) and I've never sent an attachment before by text to anyone in the past from my iphone.
I did turn the MMS off after she told me about this, not sure what was sent in terms of an attachment as she cannot open them up.

OFM 11.1.1.4 trying to write into jacob.dll, d2kwut60.dll and JNIsharedstubs.dll when these are being used by 10gAS

Hi All,
We are working on a 10g Application Server to Oracle Fusion Middleware upgrade project. We currently have more than one application in the 10gAS and the upgrade to OFM is being done one at a time. So, until all the applications gets upgraded to OFM, we will have few applications running on 10gAS and some on OFM. We access these applications through Citrix. The Citrix server has JRE 1.6.0_29 which is used by our 10gAS applications. This is the same JRE version that our future OFM apps will also be using. When we tried to test our OFM upgraded app in our development environment, we found that fusion is trying to update the above mentioned dll files. That said, I have two questions:
1. What is that Fusion is trying to wirte into these DLL files? Any idea?
2. Will Fusion changing these files have any impact on the applications that is running on 10GAS?
I would appreicate your response.
Thanks in Advance,
Prathap

These files are part of WEBUTIL and are downloaded to a client-location as configured in the webutil.cfg -file. If you use WEBUTIL in your 10G IAS, these files are also downloaded there. I guess that for 10G and 11G the dll's are different, but i can't tell you what happens when you have a 1=G and a 11G application running on one client at the same time. I'd suggest you try out a form which uses functionality where one of the dll's is used.

What command can I run to see what ports are being used?

I am trying to connect to citrix and I am receiving a message saying port 999 already in use.
How can I fix this?
Thanks,
JS

I don't know about commands but in your application/utilities folder there is an application called Network Utility that can scan your ports. I don't have any real experience with it but if it seems confusing try accessing the help files for the utility in the help menu and maybe that will ease the confusion.

Web links (URLs) are being parsed in the conversation feed - disable this?

I noticed that some of recent updates in skype for mac started to be too clever with links I post in conversations - it tries to fetch the content, parse it and present some small excerpt if it in the conversation. But I mostly message links to closed sites - like Google Docs or internal knowledge base - and they require logging in. So, I know mostly see in my conversations with collegues something like this. How can I disable this behavior? I want to see plain links, I do not need this supersmart parsing.

Well, I want to see IMAGES in the chat (i.e. someone transmits actual image data), but I don't want to see WEB PREVIEWS (previews of web pages, or the picture an image URL points to) in the chat. Data is data, and a link is a link. Data should be displayed, and links should remain links. If someone wants me to see a web page, they should make a screen grab to their local computer, and then send me the picture as an image. Otherwise they should send me a link, which then I can peruse at my own convenience (which usually includes first scrubbing the link of any identifying trailing garbage.)
As a matter of fact, I don't want Microsoft/Skype to PARSE ANYTHING that I transmit.
Just as automatic loading of remote images in HTML e-mail messages constitutes a major security risk and privacy breach, so does this web preview function.
I have absolutely no intention to disclose who I'm conversing with and what we talk about, but if someone sends me a link that hasn't been properly "cleaned up", then the site will know who sent me the link, who received it, what the conversation might have been about etc. and that information is sent without my consent.
I have ZERO tolerance for Microsoft's lack of sensitivity to privacy, and where we users are being stripped naked to prying eyes, all in the guise of some "neat features".
I don't need no "neat features". If you want web links to work the way they are supposed to work on the Mac, then allow for a right-click with a QuickLook option, but display the link in it's full length with all the "garbage" that will be transmitted to the site when the link is clicked upon, no "user friendly URL" version, that makes a link look like it were a harmless, state-free static link, while in fact it's a 900 character long monster with encoded state and personal details. One might think that's part of the PRISM program...

Web links (URLs) are being parsed in the conversat...

I noticed that some of recent updates in skype for mac started to be too clever with links I post in conversations - it tries to fetch the content, parse it and present some small excerpt if it in the conversation.
But I mostly message links to closed sites - like Google Docs or internal knowledge base - and they require logging in. So, I know mostly see in my conversations with collegues something like this.
How can I disable this behavior? I want to see plain links, I do not need this supersmart parsing.

Well, I want to see IMAGES in the chat (i.e. someone transmits actual image data), but I don't want to see WEB PREVIEWS (previews of web pages, or the picture an image URL points to) in the chat. Data is data, and a link is a link. Data should be displayed, and links should remain links. If someone wants me to see a web page, they should make a screen grab to their local computer, and then send me the picture as an image. Otherwise they should send me a link, which then I can peruse at my own convenience (which usually includes first scrubbing the link of any identifying trailing garbage.)
As a matter of fact, I don't want Microsoft/Skype to PARSE ANYTHING that I transmit.
Just as automatic loading of remote images in HTML e-mail messages constitutes a major security risk and privacy breach, so does this web preview function.
I have absolutely no intention to disclose who I'm conversing with and what we talk about, but if someone sends me a link that hasn't been properly "cleaned up", then the site will know who sent me the link, who received it, what the conversation might have been about etc. and that information is sent without my consent.
I have ZERO tolerance for Microsoft's lack of sensitivity to privacy, and where we users are being stripped naked to prying eyes, all in the guise of some "neat features".
I don't need no "neat features". If you want web links to work the way they are supposed to work on the Mac, then allow for a right-click with a QuickLook option, but display the link in it's full length with all the "garbage" that will be transmitted to the site when the link is clicked upon, no "user friendly URL" version, that makes a link look like it were a harmless, state-free static link, while in fact it's a 900 character long monster with encoded state and personal details.
One might think that's part of the PRISM program...

USB, Firewire ports not being recognized?

Recently, I've been having trouble using my USB and firewire ports. I have a 1TB WD external hard drive which has been working fine until about a month ago when it stopped being recognized when I connected it through Firewire. I thought maybe my firewire cable or port was bad so I tried hooking it up through the USB port and it still didn't recognize that it was connected. After playing with it for a while, I finally got it to back it up.
Tonight I connected a thumb drive and it is not being recognized either.
Both ports are being recognized it Disk Utility and in System Profiler, and the USB ports work when I use them to charge my phone and Ipod all the time.
Any suggestions?

Well now I feel a little silly..
I have tried using it on another computer and it was recognized just fine.
However, I have not tried manually mounting my WD hard drive and when I went to try to that, it worked just fine right away, without doing anything.
I then tried the thumb drive again and when I tried to mount it, it came up with this error:
"The disk “UDISK” could not be mounted.
Try running First Aid on the disk and then retry mounting."
So I ran First Aid and it came up with this error:
"Disk Utility stopped verifying “UDISK” because the following error was encountered:
Filesystem verify or repair failed."
The details say that the "File system is left marked as dirty."
So I guess there must be something wrong with the thumb drive, although it seemed to work fine on my PC.

Hyperlinks being stripped

So I upgraded to Excel 2008 only to discover that it is stripping all the hyperlinks out of any of my work spreadsheets that I open.
So, I went over to Numbers and opened the same spreadsheet. The first two columns of this spreadsheet are lists of numbers, all hyperlinked to a web page. Well, in Numbers the first cell's hyperlink is still there, but all the rest have been stripped!
There's nothing complicated about this spreadsheet, its simply 7 columns of info, the first two columns being numbers that have hyperlinks to web pages. Thats it, wasn't created with any macro's or anything. My IS guy created them in perl using Spreadsheet::WriteExcel, using the write_url() function, and everything looks fine in his copy of excel 2k8 or my copy of Excel 2004.
I really don't want to have to keep using Excel 2004 if I don't have to. Since MS was stupid enough to break their own software and these spreadsheets seem to TRY to open correctly in Numbers, does anyone have any idea why the hyperlinks are being stripped out so I can at least use this?

Hello
In a not so old thread (02/13) I passed a list of Numbers error messages related to exchanges with XL.
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=6587857
You may copy them in a doc for future ref
Some of these messages are related to hyperlinks.
Here they are.
+Couldn’t export hyperlinks outside table cells+
+Hyperlinks in cells that don’t contain text weren’t imported.+
+Hyperlinks on shapes aren’t supported and were removed.+
+Hyperlinks within workbooks and hyperlinks to other files aren’t supported and were removed.+
Maybe they explain what you get.
Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE mercredi 19 mars 2008 18:14:31)

What incoming public TCP ports are blocked?

I just setup my 890L to forward incoming public TCP ports to to a couple of my LAN devices. Unfortunately, it looks like VZB is purposefully blocking common incoming TCP ports.
I tried searching on google.com for what ports are blocked; but, just found a bunch of posts like this one. Some people actually tried contacting 1st and 2nd tied VZB tech support about this; but, it's clear they don't have this information available to them.
Has anyone verified what incoming public TCP ports are not blocked? There's no easy way for me to test this using my 890L.

You can find out for yourself which ports are being blocked by using a Port Query utility. Depending on the OS of your computer there should be multiple utilties available for free floating around.
As we have seen numerous times before, devices on VZW's new SIM card/4G LTE network are blocked from many of the public facing services and features we have previously been dependant on. Public IP Addresses, Public Ports, Webcams, VOIP phones, etc. all suffer under the same umbrella of limitations on the new network. The list is too long to publish everything that is blocked or not working as it previously did. Much easier for you to post the requirements of your application and have us confirm if its working or not.
If you have not already experimented with VPN's I'd suggest checking them out. VPN's are one of the easiest ways around these new limitations. With a VPN enabled your device will tunnel all of its communications out an allowed port to a VPN server where your traffic is free to act normally before returning to you.

VLANs 133-134 on Interface port-channel10 are being suspended. (Reason: Vlan is not allowed on Peer-link)

I just added 2 vlans Port-channel10 on two of my Nexus 5000's that go from the to a 6509 Catalyst switch. I get this error when I do a show log:(VLANs 133-134 on Interface port-channel10 are being suspended. (Reason: Vlan is not allowed on Peer-link) When I do a sh int trunk I see Po10 (int Eth1/3) that Vlans Err-disabled on Trunk. Another odd thing when I do an spanning tree summary neith 133 or 134 is added in to the summary? Why would spanning-tree be ignoring these two new vlans?
They are configured as so:
interface port-channel10
description "vpc 10 eth1/3 to 6506 po10 ten5/4"
switch port mode trunk
switchport trunk native vlan 999
switchport trunk allowed vlan 130.,133-134,139,145,155,160-175,239,242,254,999
vpc10
What can I do to get 133 and 134 vlans to stop erroring on Port-channel 10 on both Nexus 5000's?

Firstly I should say I have not used Nexus switches so the following advice should be treated with caution.
Have you added the same vlans to the allowed vlans on your vPC peer link. That is what the error message seems to be telling you ie. they are not currently allowed.
They need to be allowed otherwise the vlans are suspended which is what is happening.
As I say I haven't used these switches so I can't say for sure if there is any downtime/disruption when you modify the allowed list but I think that is your problem from what I can see.
Jon

IPhone 5 charging port has gold strips sticking up inside it, and now it won't charge

I dropped my phone in the toilet yesterday, and it half submerged into the water (the water reached just beneath the sim card slot). I took it out of the toilet immediately and pressed down the lock button and slid it to power off. I then put it in a bowl full of rice (standing upright so no water inside could make it's way up to the top part of the phone). After 16 hours I turned it on and it worked perfectly fine, no damage at all (very lucky). However when it died and I went to charge it I realised a bit of rice was stuck inside the charging port. So with a clip I kept jabbing at the piece of rice until I got it out. Now I've come to charge it and it won't work. When I shine a flashlight into it I can see there are gold strips sticking up instead of them being pushed down into the phone. I think this happened from accidently pulling some up with the clip. Does anyone know how to fix this problem? How much will apple charge to repair the charging port?
-the water sensor indicator inside the sim tray is still completely white, and inside the headphone jack and charging port I can't see any indicators at all
-the phone is 5 months old on a 2 year contract with 3
If you have any idea's or solutions please leave them below, thanks!

Yes, you probably destroyed the connector with your probing. Apple will replace the phone for $269. Unless you can convince them it should be covered by warranty (and your warranty is still in effect). If it is out of warranty an independent repair shop may be able to replace the lightning connector.

In the privacy policy, it states that percentages and durations of books read are being collected to ensure that publishers can have a metered price model, prices depending on how the book was read. Give me an example of a company with such a price model?

In your privacy policy, you state that the percentages and durations of books read are being collected to ensure that publishers can choose a metered price model. Prices which depends on the duration for which the book was read.
Give me an example of a company with such a price model? Are the information being collected even where the companies have not asked for the information, even when the metered price models are not being used?
Here is an extract från the privacy policy:
What information does Adobe Digital Editions collect and how is it used?
The following information may be collected when an eBook with DRM is opened in Adobe Digital Editions software. If an eBook does not have any DRM associated with it, then no information is collected.
User GUID: The User GUID is a unique value assigned in place of your User ID and is used to authenticate you.
Device GUID: The Device GUID is a unique value generated to identify your device. It is used to ensure that the eBook may be viewed on your device and that the number of devices permitted by the license is not exceeded.
Certified App ID: This ID represents the application that is being used to view the eBook, in this case Adobe Digital Editions. It is necessary to ensure that only a certified application may display an eBook. This helps to minimize piracy and theft of eBooks.
Device IP (Internet Protocol): This identifies the country you are located in when you purchase an eBook. It is used by eBook providers for the enablement of localized pricing models. Only the country identifier of the Device IP is stored.
Duration for Which the Book was Read: This information may be collected to facilitate limited or metered pricing models entered into between eBook providers, such as publishers and distributors. These models are based on how long a reader has read an eBook. For example, you may borrow an eBook for a period of 30 days. While some publishers and distributors may charge libraries and resellers for 30 days from the date of the download, others may follow a metered pricing model and charge them for the actual time you read the eBook.
Percentage of the eBook Read: The percentage of the eBook read may be collected to allow eBook providers such as publishers to implement subscription pricing models where they charge based on the percentage of the eBook read.
Information provided by eBook providers relating to the eBook you have purchased: The following information is provided by the eBook provider to enable the delivery of the eBook to your device:Date of eBook purchase/download
Distributor ID and Adobe Content Server Operator URL
Metadata of the eBook, such as title, author, language, publisher list price, ISBN number
How is the information transmitted?
The data is sent periodically to Adobe via a secure transmission using HTTPS.
How is the information used?
Adobe uses the information collected about the eBook you have opened in Adobe Digital Editions software to ensure it is being viewed in accordance with the type of DRM license that accompanies that eBook. The type of license is determined by the eBook provider. For more information on how each piece of data is used, please see above.

In your privacy policy, you state that the percentages and durations of books read are being collected to ensure that publishers can choose a metered price model. Prices which depends on the duration for which the book was read.
Give me an example of a company with such a price model? Are the information being collected even where the companies have not asked for the information, even when the metered price models are not being used?
Here is an extract från the privacy policy:
What information does Adobe Digital Editions collect and how is it used?
The following information may be collected when an eBook with DRM is opened in Adobe Digital Editions software. If an eBook does not have any DRM associated with it, then no information is collected.
User GUID: The User GUID is a unique value assigned in place of your User ID and is used to authenticate you.
Device GUID: The Device GUID is a unique value generated to identify your device. It is used to ensure that the eBook may be viewed on your device and that the number of devices permitted by the license is not exceeded.
Certified App ID: This ID represents the application that is being used to view the eBook, in this case Adobe Digital Editions. It is necessary to ensure that only a certified application may display an eBook. This helps to minimize piracy and theft of eBooks.
Device IP (Internet Protocol): This identifies the country you are located in when you purchase an eBook. It is used by eBook providers for the enablement of localized pricing models. Only the country identifier of the Device IP is stored.
Duration for Which the Book was Read: This information may be collected to facilitate limited or metered pricing models entered into between eBook providers, such as publishers and distributors. These models are based on how long a reader has read an eBook. For example, you may borrow an eBook for a period of 30 days. While some publishers and distributors may charge libraries and resellers for 30 days from the date of the download, others may follow a metered pricing model and charge them for the actual time you read the eBook.
Percentage of the eBook Read: The percentage of the eBook read may be collected to allow eBook providers such as publishers to implement subscription pricing models where they charge based on the percentage of the eBook read.
Information provided by eBook providers relating to the eBook you have purchased: The following information is provided by the eBook provider to enable the delivery of the eBook to your device:Date of eBook purchase/download
Distributor ID and Adobe Content Server Operator URL
Metadata of the eBook, such as title, author, language, publisher list price, ISBN number
How is the information transmitted?
The data is sent periodically to Adobe via a secure transmission using HTTPS.
How is the information used?
Adobe uses the information collected about the eBook you have opened in Adobe Digital Editions software to ensure it is being viewed in accordance with the type of DRM license that accompanies that eBook. The type of license is determined by the eBook provider. For more information on how each piece of data is used, please see above.

URLs (ports) are being stripped by 10gAS?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for