Use of negative Plan values in CJ40

Hi everyone
I would like to know if anyone uses negatives plan values via CJ40 to reflect possible refunds ect. If you have, has there been any impact on any areas, eg reporting, end of year roll etc. Alternatively, how does your area process such examples as below
An example case is where we have spent 1.5M on land aquisition for 2009, but expect a refund cheque of 500K in 2010. The business want to put -500,000 against cost element planning via CJ40.
Many thanks for your assistance.
Trish

no it is definitely not revenue
imagine if you got a refund for your airfares - that is not revenue - it is cost that you spent being refunded - which means that you did not spend anything
revenue is when you earn something by providing goods and services and to provide these you may incur costs / time
secondly budgeting is not done on revenue (still searching for that elusive organisation that would want to budget revenue)

Similar Messages

Negative Planned Values in CJ40

Dear Guru's,
i am getting negative planned values in CJ40 against Order/Network column. I am unable to find the root of this value.
Here i am using the network costing, BOM's and MRP run process. So can any one tell me how to find the root of that negative cost plan value.
Reagrds,
Rao.

Hi Rao,
Could you please perform the below steps?
1. Execute the transaction CJEN for the affected project
2. Execute the report BPDIST0 in SE38 for the affected project
Should the problem still persists, please implement the report ZAIMPLDL
from the attached note 887864.
1. Execute the report ZAIMPLDL for the project
2. Then execute CJEN and BPDIST0 again.
Regards,
Enrique

Single project report for Plan values, Budget values,commitments & actual

Hi experts,
Highly appreciated if any experts can let me know report which can be used to view Plan values, Budget values , commitments & actual values for each and every WBS levels for given project.
I need one report to view all mentioned fields.
Kind regards,
Sam Lesha.

Dear Amit,
TX lot for your helpful quick answer, I checked the report, it's fine and i need to clear one more thing .
when i select Std profile as PS infor profile there i could find plan version 0 & 1. would it be pssible to know how i can add one more plan versions to this.
Tx in advance,
Reg,
Sam Lesha

How to use the same variable value for data entry and the planning sequence

Hi,
the scenario is the following:
Using the WAD template a user enters cost center plan data. The cost center is selected by the chosen value for the variable "V1".
Afterwards he shall push a button which starts a planning sequence (including saving the data and further functions). This planning sequence uses a filter that also contains the variable "V1".
What or where has it to be defined that the planning sequence uses automatically the same value for the variable "V1" as selected for the data entry?

You have to define in the planning function. The planning sequence is only a sequence and it read the planning functions underneath it.
Ravi Thothadri

Essbase Variable with more than a value for use after in Planning forms.

I want to now if it would be possible to create a variable with more than a value for use after in Planning forms.
The variable that I want to use is created in Essbase.
Example:
&Years = FY08,FY09,FY10

Hi.
The only workaround I know for the problem is to create parent in the dimension.
In your case, create member “planyears”.
Then you define children that are shard (this are the multiple member for the variables FY08, FY09 etc..)
Create Essbase sub variable that will have 1 member value “planyears”
When you use the Sub Variable in form select function “Children” and in that case it will use the member FY08,FY09 etc on the form.
Limitation: I’m working on version 9.2.0.3 so you can’t create hierarchy in the year dimension, but you can use it in other dimension.
AE

How to force a sql_id to use a specific hash plan value

Hi,
in my 11.2 database i've seen that a sql_id change hash plan value.
The original was more faster than second, but optimizer use second.
How can i force the sql_id to use the first hash plan value?
Tnx

Hi,
i've a problem.
I've fixed the plan 3 days ago, but looking AWR (today), it use old hash plan.
Plan Hash           Total Elapsed                 1st Capture   Last Capture
#   Value                    Time(ms)    Executions       Snap ID        Snap ID
1   2658787094              3,592,228             0           334            334looking into dba_sql_plan_baselines i've 2 plan_name, and only one is fixed.
select *
from table(dbms_xplan.display_sql_plan_baseline(sql_handle => 'SQL_3d5572d6f5e8cdda', format => 'basic'));
Plan name: SQL_PLAN_3upbkuvuyjmfub082c0c4         Plan id: 2961359044
Enabled: YES     Fixed: NO      Accepted: YES     Origin: MANUAL-LOAD
Plan hash value: 2658787094
Plan name: SQL_PLAN_3upbkuvuyjmfu7ca80389         Plan id: 2091385737
Enabled: YES     Fixed: YES     Accepted: YES     Origin: MANUAL-LOAD
Plan hash value: 3534976400
id plan hash last seen            elapsed (s) origin          note
   1 3534976400 2012-10-26/14:00:11      183.232 AWR             not reproducible
   2 2658787094 2012-10-29/12:00:24    23116.872 AWR             not reproducible Why i see old plan (2658787094)?
Thanks

KEPM....Delete plan values..

Hi Experts-
Here i am facing on eissue pls suggest....
In KEPM i did planning for 2011, that is updated with wrong values and with wrong combination......
I have deleted all steps in KEPM, but still i am getting those values in KE30 report....pls guide me how to delete plan values...
Pls suggest how to delete those values and what steps need to take in planning?
Thanks
Chandu

Hi Reddy Anna
You can use transaction KE1C in order to delete planning data.
But transaction KE1C does not phyically delete entries made in table CE2xxxx. The method used in this situation is the reversal method (the line item is reversed out of the table by posting a negative line item).
If you want to delete these line items totally then I would suggest that you use the archiving transaction SARA. This will reduce the table size.
You also have a delete option in KEPM but this is normally for large volume of data and you can check if it is useful in your case.
You could also use KE13N to post the delta to edit/correct the entries. For example for customer A and product B you have revenue of 1000 (but it should be 900). In that case you can post a line item of -100 so that the result is 900.
You can see which option is most suitable for you
br, Ajay M

PS : Plan value query in Plan report S_ALR_87013533.

Dear PS Experts,
We are refering to a report T-Code : S_ALR_87013533 - Plan/Actual/Commitment/Rem.Plan/Assigned. For one of the WBS, we find some planned values.
We checked the following for Plan value research :
1. In CJ40/CJ41 : We find Plan values in the fields "Planned Total" against that WBS Element.
2. In CJR3 : No plan values inserted / uploaded. Meaning its all blank and there's no WBS having any Plan Values against any Cost Elements.
With the help of F1, on the field of "Planned Total" of CJ40/CJ41, I could find explanation & understand "Plan total is the annual or overall plan value including existing values from unit costing and cost element planning. In the cost planning of projects, the plan total also includes the plan total for all orders and networks assigned to the chosen WBS element and those subordinate to it."
Please help me to know :
1. If not CJ40 or CJR3, then from where do I am getting Plan values.
2. From where would I be able to find those line items (planned or actuals) reflecting in the

Hi,
I m just refering to report T-Code : S_ALR_87013533 - Plan/Actual/Commitment/Rem.Plan/Assigned. In that, for one of the WBS, we find some planned values.
Refering to CJ33, we observe that the :
1. Overall Budget is 985,000.00
2. Planned Total is 1,321,986.41
We checked CJ40 & CJR3 and have found that we havent uploaded any plan values (thru both the T-Codes), but still Plan Values Total shows as 1,321,986.41
Please help me to know : If not CJ40 or CJR3, then from where do I am getting Plan values.

Using Y-T-D values in Business Rules

Hi All,
I am using Hyperion Planning 11.1.1.1.0.
I have enabled Y-T-D dynamic time series in the application.
I need to calculate YTD variance% , the formula to be used is :
(Y-T-D(Oct)Budget - Y-T-D(Oct) Actual) / Y-T-D(Oct)Budget * 100.
I have a business rule(created in EAS) that does the other variance % calculations which are pretty simple like Budget-Actual/Budget*100.
The formuls for the normal variance Percentage works but i get an error when writing a formula for :
"Variance%(YTDActual&YTDBudget)"
("Variance%(YTDActual&YTDBudget)"="Y-T-D(&CurrentMonth)"->Budget - "Y-T-D(&CurrentMonth)"->Actual / "Y-T-D(&CurrentMonth)"->Budget *100;)
The error that comes up is as follows:
Detail:Cannot calculate. Analytic Server Error(1200497): Error compiling formula for [Variance%(YTDActual&YTDBudget)] (line 2): unknown member name ["Y-T-D(&CurrentMonth)"] in function [operator @X]
Can somebody please advice as how to use Y-T-D values in the formulas?
Kind Regards.
Mirka

Here are a couple of tips that may help:
1) You cannot directly reference dynamic-time-series members in a business rule or a member formula. These are "virtual" members. This is a common misconception.
2) Even if you could reference these members in a formula, you couldn't store a value in them anyway, as they are dynamic.
3) It usually doesn't make a lot of sense to calculate variances like these in a business rule. I would recommend making them dynamic, two-pass member formulas (not business rules) in your Scenario dimension. They don't need to be "Two pass" in the typical sense (eg. recalculating a ratio at the quarters), but they need to fire last, so set them as two pass. (otherwise you will end up with order of calculation issues where other calculations fire after the variance and you get incorrect results).
In looking at your requirement, you don't really need a variance that calls out dynamic time series members. Simply create a variance scenario with a formula like @VARPER("Budget", "Actual");. If you have "Y-T-D(Oct)" selected as your time period in your form or spreadsheet, and "Bud vs Act %" (this is your new variance scenario) selected, it will calculate the YTD variance for October, or whatever time period you have selected.
Just to recap:
1) Create a new scenario called "Bud vs Act %". Make it dynamic and two-pass. Give it a formula of @VARPER("Budget", "Actual");
2) Scrap your business rule. Add other variance scenarios as needed.
3) Add your YTD member and your variance scenario to a form, and test.
Hope this helps,
- Jake

Can we use MRP to plan for FERT in-house produced with PIR's & has Min/Max

Hi SAP Guru's
I have a very critical issue from the client who wants to use MIN/ MAX stock values for planning its finished products (in-house produced)
here is the details of the scenario
Client recieves 2 Excel files every week from customer
1st file contains the Weekly Demand Forecast of FERT material for next 1 year and they upload it in MD61 as PIR's BUT this value is also Inclusive of Safety stock value (ex: if weekly demand entered in MD61 as PIR is 50 and if safety stock value is 10, then actual demand is only 40)
2nd file send contains only safety stock values (for ex in this case let it = 10) to be maintained for the FERT materials
the client wants MRP to plan and trigger based on this PIR's in MD61 and Safety stock level fand plan for FERT, HALB and also ROH materials as defined in the BOM also taking into consideration the current WIP levels (Work in progress for any existing production orders currently being processed) based on the production Lead times values maintained
so what the client wants is they want to maintain 2 stock values, that is one least stock value and other higher value which if stock falls below this point, will trigger production based on the lead time and considering any WIP levels also
(for ex in this case if PIR = 50 and safety stock is 10, MRP run result client wants is = 30 and NOT =40)
so here are my questions
1. is this scenario feasible? use safety stock and min/max level for in-house produced finished which has demand PIRs in MD61 at the same time?
2. Also due to SOX complaince regulations, the client does not want to change the forecast values in MD61, so is it possible to make some settings so that forecast is corrected by WIThOUT including the safety stock value in it? ( for ex: in this case as = 40 only and NOt as 50)
3. which all settings should i maintain like for MRP type or lot size or stock qty levels or anyother customizations if any required so that when we run MRP, can it ignore the safety stock value and generate the client desired output?
thank u verymuch for your time & expert advice in advance

Hi Chakri,
This is not possible as per standard functionality. MRP always creates proposals for the shortage quantity of the safety stock. We have used the user exit in the plant level MRP run to exclude both plant and safety stock in the net requirements calculation.
You have to write logic to convert the safety stock into plant stock in the user exit so there will be no additional procurement proposals...you can create custom indicatar in materail master or linked any existing indicator like MRP group to the user exits so the MRP will checks this and will not create proposals for the selected parts.
If you have any questions then please inform.
Regards
TAJUDDIN

Planned values of profit centers not showing up in customised report painte

Hi,
I made a customised profit center report via report painter. I have already uploaded planned values in KP06. In the customised report painter, the record type is "1" (plan) and version is "0" for actual/plan. The columns for the planned values do not show any figures. But when I generate std SAP report S_ALR_87013340 - Profit Center Group: Plan/Actual/Variance, it shows the plan values. In that way, I know that the cost center upload is correct.
Please advise on how to show the plan values on the report painter.
Thanks and best regards,
Thess

Hi,
ahhh...the fact that you can see the actual values has made me realize what the problem might be. GLPCP and GLPCA (actual line items) use different fields in regard to the period. I assume that you are utilizing the POPER characteristic to select the periods....correct?
In that case please try the following: copy library 8A3 into the customer name space (I would always base customized reports on your own library). In your copy activate the RPMAX characteristic. The re-create your report based on the new library and make the following changes: use RPMAX in the general selection and only use POPER in the column definition for the actual values. That should work.
Regards
Karl
P.S....hope you bear in mind that such a report is a potential performance nightmare.

APC Value and Plan Value for an Asset.

HI Gurus,
I am developing a report where I have to display the APC value and Plan value of an Asset.Can anyone pls give an insight how to find this for the Asset.

Hi,
why don´t you use the logical database ADA which most of the FI-AA standard reports do? The logical database is a service to get this information without developing all the READ information and translation by yourself, especially when talking about mid-year-reporting, consistence checks, etc..
If you decide to use ADA, then the events GET ANLA0, GET ANLAV and GET ANLCV are from interest for you for information about APC and planned/posted depreciation value.
Regards,
Markus

Asset planned values computed positive value Issue

HI experts,
I have an existing asset problem where the planned depreciation values becomes positive. Why does it becomes positive? How does system calculates this planned values? We just did some adjustment to the Asset by Credit Memo and another Mark-up transaction. Sample:
Asset 1610600065
Planned Values - Transactions:
26.02.2011     160,000.00-     160     Credit memo in following year     64,000.00     0.00     0.00     SGD
26.12.2010     98,666.66     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     43,851.85-     98,666.66     98,666.66     SGD
26.12.2010     98,666.66-     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     43,851.85     98,666.66-     98,666.66-     SGD
26.12.2010     93,333.33     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     41,481.48-     93,333.33     93,333.33     SGD
26.12.2010     93,333.33-     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     41,481.48     93,333.33-     93,333.33-     SGD
26.02.2011     160,000.00     160     Credit memo in following year     64,000.00-     0.00     0.00     SGD
23.06.2011     160,000.00-     160     Credit memo in following year     60,000.00     0.00     0.00     SGD
26.12.2010     101,333.33     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     33,925.92-     101,333.33     101,333.33     SGD
                                                               26,074.08     101,333.33     101,333.33     SGD
But the planned/posted value for this period is positive:
Status Status Period Amount
Green Posted     1     6,666.67-
Green Posted     2     6,666.66-
Green Posted     3     6,666.67-
Green Posted     4     6,666.67-
Green Posted     5     6,666.66-
Green Posted     6     6,370.37
YellowPlanned     7     4,493.83-
Posted Values - Depreciation Posted/Planned:
APC transactions     400,000.00     160,000.00-     240,000.00     SGD
Acquisition value     400,000.00     160,000.00-     240,000.00     SGD
Ordinary deprec.     220,000.00-     26,962.96-     246,962.96-     SGD
Unplanned dep.                    SGD
Write-ups          101,333.33     101,333.33     SGD
Value adjustment                    SGD
Revaluation ord.dep.                    SGD
Net book value     180,000.00     85,629.63-     94,370.37     SGD
Down payments                    SGD
Scrap value                    SGD

I believe in your case, the tremendous reduction in APC cost has caused a tremendous change in planned depreciation. System looks at the NBV and the remaining periods of useful life each time it calcs depreciation. Of course also looks at depreciation key, Period Control, and OAYR Smoothing button. Asset class can also be set for group depreciation.
If a credit memo reduced the APC value dramatically, then the amount of depreciation on the asset at that moment is more than enough so far. This means that the next running of the AFAB program will reduce its amount of depreciation from the amount it was planning to book since it already has an excess of accumulated depreciation.
Please check in OAYR to know if your Smoothing indicator has been checked for the Company Code. As I understand the system, if this indicator is checked - the system will not catch-up the whole difference in the next running of AFAB. Instead, it will smooth out the adjustments due to credit memos, unplanned depreciation, and changes in remaining useful life over the remaining life of the asset. When smoothing is set, one gets less drastic period to period change.
This setting should be in line with your accounting rules, such as in US GAAP changes in depreciable life are considered estimate changes requiring only prospective corrections, and so should smooth out impact over remaining periods of useful life versus immediate catch-up.
You may want to run a AFAR (check for recalc flags) and then a Repeat AFAB in the current period after making master data changes for depreciation. All open periods would be impacted by master data changes if you run AFAB.

Down Payment processing for Sales orders using Milestone Billing Plan

Hi,
The business scenario is as follows.
The delivery for the sales orders are to be created only after the pre payment( a percentage of the total sales order value) is made by the customer.
Hence the sales orders while creation are blocked for delivery creation using credit block by means of a userexit.
The credit manager checks the blocked sales orders using VKM1 transaction and verify if there are any payments made by the customer to cover this pre payment to be made.
If it is enough to cover then he releases the sales order manually for delivery creation.This is a complex process since there are too many sales orders and the payments made by the customer may not match the amount to be paid(it can be greater or lesser).The customer just pays a huge amount which is to be distributed among the sales orders for pre payments.
Later, when the invoice is created, the customer account is cleared manually using F-32 transaction for the oldest open invoices.
Here again there is a huge manual effort involved since he need to distribute the amount against the invoices using oldest open item principle.
As a solution we are planning to implement "Down Payment processing for Sales orders using Milestone Billing Plan".
Is this the right solution?
Can you please give the steps in detail to implement this functionality for above scenario?
We are using SAP 4.7 version without Project Systems.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ragesh

Hi Ragesh
Check the links where you will get the entire down-payment configuration
[https://forums.sdn.sap.com/post!replydownpayments ]
Regards
Srinath

How to get GL plan value plant wise

Hello,
Can you tell anybody where to updated GL plan value plant wise. In GP12N there is no planner profile for plant wise.
Thanks & reagrds,
Preethi kadkol

Hi,
Go toT.code FAGLL03 (GL Account Line Item Display G/L View).You Select the Custom Selections (Ctrl+F1) Button and there In GL Account Line Items select Plant and Click on Copy Selected Button at the bottom and provide the Plant Details and Saveyou have an option to change the layout and select the available fields in the layout. Plant and have it in the line items report, provided you maintain it as a special field using T. Code: OBVU/O7R3 (Line layaout variant for special fields).
Thanks,
Raviteja

Use of negative Plan values in CJ40

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for