Use of Purchase info records in SRM SC in Extended Classic scenario

Hi All,
We have implemented SRM 7.13 with Extended classic scenario. If we have Purchase info record in SAP ECC for the material, it gets populated in SRM SC in Source of supply Tab but the price of Purchase info record does not get updated in the SC line item.
Can anyone let me know which configurations is required to fetch the Purchase info record price or we need to have a customization to achieve this.
Thanks,
Ankur

HI Ankur
when you say the price did not get updated did you check the sequence which is used for price determination ?
1. User entry
2. Contracts
3.  Info record
If still you think it is an issue please check the report  EBP_GET_BACKEND_PRICES and let me know if your problem gets fixed?
Regards
Vinita

Similar Messages

  • SRM 7 : Vendor record replication in backend with Extended Classic Scenario

    Hello,
    We are implementing SRM 7 with Extended Classic Scenario and Supplier Self-registration.
    Can you explain what is to be configured to get the new vendors replicated to the backend?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    It is possible to transfer suppliers to ERP system, if you use 'Supplier registration with ERP' scenario. After registration and acceptance, newly registered suppliers would appear on supplier monitor from where you can transfer them to backend system.
    Check the below link for more details:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/cf/35074152aff323e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Sanjeev

  • P-card  process available for SRM 5.0 extended classic scenario

    Hello,
    I didn't find the information, so I'm posting this message.
    Is  the p-card functionality available for the extended classic scenario in SRM 5.0 ?

    Hi,
    Use of Procurement Cards are supported in Extended calssic scenario from SRM 2007 ..onwards
    HTH
    Rajesh

  • SRM with PPS = Extended Classic Scenario

    Does SRM Procurement for Public Sector (PPS) require Extended Classic Scenario? If so, could some one refer me to an official documentation that states such? Thanks.

    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SRM/PPS-ProcurementforPublicSector-+enhancements
    PPS is only possible by ECS only.
    Muthu

  • POR (BUS2209) in SRM 5.0 (Extended Classic scenario)

    Hi Experts,
    I configured the BUS2209 transaction type (Purchase Order Response) and it is working fine in SRM 5.0 -> i am able to create POR for a PO. But when i check the PO in ECC, the "Delivery Date" field updated with the confirmed date from POR in SRM.
    In this flow I would like to have an "AB - Order Acknowledgmenet" in ECC PO at "Confirmations" tab and I don't want the system to update the original "Delivery Date" in ECC PO.
    Is there any standard solution for my problem or I should consider a development here?
    Thanks in advance for your help!
    Best Regards,
    Attila

    Hi Manjunath,
    The functionality of POR is fine in SRM. Our requirement is when a POR is generated in SRM and the information is sent to ECC (to update the PO) we do not want the system to update the "Delivery Date" field in the ECC PO automaticaly. In this case we would like the system to create one line in the "Confirmations" tab in ECC PO, because in this case we can monitor the delay between the expected delivery date and the confirmed delivery date (we have some reports in ECC which should consider the data from ECC -> when the confirmation is done directly in ECC that's fine...but now we have to figure out this "problem")
    Thanks for your help!
    Regards,
    Attila

  • Purchase info records report

    Hi All,
    Is there any report of the purcashe info records entered for different plants.
    I need to see the material prices maintained with their validity periods
    SAPXPT

    Hi
    chek this table it may useful
    EINA Purchasing Info Record- General Data
    EINE Purchasing Info Record- Purchasing Organization Data
    Regards
    Kailas ugale

  • Cost Estimate with Purchase info record

    Hello Everyone,
    I have a problem with Cost Estimation ( with Purchase info record), We hare using PIR ( Purchase Info records) for calculating cost estimation. These records are maintained on the base of Vendor and Material. There are some materials extended to more than one plant.Ex: Material: Mat1 are created under Plant PL1 and PL2.
    Problems is when we are executing cost run with parameters Mat1 and PL1, system some times taking PL2 ( the last transaction created with that material - irrespective of the plant )transactions also, please help me how to solve this problem, my user wants, system should take the transactions only selected plants.
    Thanks & Regards

    Hi,
    guess SAPNET note 713111 describes your system behaviour, additional information can be found in 351835.
    Maybe a valuation strategy with "user exit" can find the info-record price you are expecting.
    Best regards, Christian

  • Purchasing Info record for a project

    Hi,
    Please let me know whether we can have a Purchasing Info record for a Project specific.
    The scenario is:
    1.  Info record is to be maintained for regular procurement
    2. The procurement team negogiates with the vendor specific for project specific. 
    So, when we make a Purchase order for that project system has to  pick the price specific for that project. For the regular proucrement, system has to pick from the Info record.
    Please note that there may be more than one Project for a material.
    I request you to mao this requirement.
    Regards,
    Phani

    Hi
    What I understood, for your project you want to procure material.See in Project, system will create a Purchase Requisition from Network.Already you have material master for items you want to procure.Maintain Info record with vendor, material combination.If you don't have Plant or Purchase Organization for Project you have to create Plant & Purchase Organization for Project System.
    When you creating PO, system will ask for Plant.
    Sysem will autimatically fetch the Price form Info record and other conditions like excise and CST, you maintain in Condition record in MEk1 and FV11(for Tax) respectively.
    Any doubt.
    Warm regards
    PKB

  • Extended Classic Scenario Pricing issue, can I over come by using SRM-MDM?.

    Hi SRM GURU'S,
    I am using  ECC 6.0, SRM 5.5, SUS, LAC, cFolders and SRM-MDM with Extended Classic Scenario.
    My Question is : In case of Extended classic scenario, there is issue with Pricing and conditions. Is there any possibility to overcome this issue by using SRM-MDM. Or do I have to go for IPC. My client has not brought IPC. I have to cover Pricing with the above components.
    Anyone suggest me, how to proceed.  Thanks in Advance. Awaiting for quick response.
    Thanks & Regards,
    John.

    Hi Masa,
    We can maintain Price and conditions as a record in CCM for Particular Material or Vendor. When you add that record to shopping cart it will update. I mean, If the provision is available in MDM, I don't want to use the Two components for same functionality.
    If I use IPC, Is there separate license for that. What else need to be updated to use IPC (Patches etc).
    If you have IPC configuration material, could you please share with me? How to bridge the SRM Conditions and ECC Conditions?
    Please clearly give me details.  I really appreciate you.
    Regards,
    John.

  • Extended Classic Scenario - Can Purchase Requsition be created in R/3?

    Hi SRM Gurus,
    In Extended Classic Scenario, Is it possible to have Purchase Req to be created in the backend?
    Technically whether it is possible or not? Functionally, there is no such need, I agree.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ramkumar

    Hi
    Please confirm what sceanrio in SRM are you planning for ?
    I have not tried this. In Extended Classic Scenario, using BADI " BBP_TARGET_OBJTYPE"    -> I guess, it's possible, but not sure. Try it out. 
    Purchase Order (PO) will be created in the R/3 system using the BADI -  BBP_TARGET_OBJTYPE. Please read the standard documentation of this BADI, before implementing the same.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Service base IV flag need to be set for SRM PO u2013 SRM 7.0 Extended classic

    Hello
    We are on  SRM 7.0  Extended classic scenario -  business have following requirement  with Service PO
    Invoice need to be posted with reference to conformation (SES) u2013 While creating a service PO  when user maintain  GR required  flag ,  u201CConfirmation-Based Invoice Verificationu201D flag get automatically set  but when PO replicated in ECC, it has  only GR base IV  flag ticked and not the Service base IV  which is required  from Invoicing perspective
    On SRM PO unlike ECC PO  there is only provision to maintained GR base IV and not SR base IV. So how can we achieve this
    Can we do it via BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI.   
    Note : SR base IV  flag cannot be maintained in Vendor master in ECC  because of  business constrain  so it has to be pass from SRM PO only

    Hello,
    Make some tests using R/3 BAdI BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI.
    Nevertheless, only BBP_MAP_BEFORE_BAPI method has field SRV_BASED_IV in changing parameter BAPI_POITEM.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • Creating Conditions for Purchase Info Records using IDoc COND_A01

    Hi All,
    we are using IDOC COND_A01 to update and add conditions in ME12 transactions.
    But when we send a condition IDoc which contains 2 condition types (Segment KONP), the standard function call creates only one database entry in the table KONP. The entry in KONP is for  standard condition types PB00, but not  for company specific types (Say: ZABC) .But when we create them manually in ME12 maintaining an purchase info record  we get both the entries in the KONP database table.
    Has anyone come accross such a problem? Is there any special field in the IDoc COND_A01 which controls the creation of the condition types?
    Thanks for any answer!

    U should use basic type INFREC01 instead of NFRECMASS01.
    Within the FM there is a check for basic type like:
    check idoc type
        if f_idoc_control-idoctp <> c_idoctp_infrec01. " INFREC01
          raise wrong_function_called.
        endif.
    Edited by: Joyjit Ghosh on Sep 15, 2008 4:57 PM

  • Creation of purchase info records using me11 and me12

    are there any bapis for creation / update  of purchase info records with  pricing conditions using transaction me11 and me12 ?
    plz tell me ?
    Moderator message: please search for available information before asking.
    locked by: Thomas Zloch on Aug 10, 2010 2:52 PM

    looks like it accepted A017.
    Why did you choose basis type COND_A04 ?
    As this one is very special for long material numbers ( more than 18 digit material numbers) do you have such?
    E1VFSCAH is the Scale header in case of dimension specific scales. do you have such?
    Just try it with COND_A01

  • Upload Purchase info Records using LSMW

    Hi,
      Im uploading purchase info records using LSMW - direct method
    Object               0060   Purchasing info rec.
    Method               0000
    Program Name         RM06IBI0
    i need step by step process for this. any one have done this using this program help me out.
    Regards,
    Vimal

    Hello Jürgen
    and thank you!
    One additional question: When I import info records using LSMW, one condition record (PB00) is created automatically. Is it possible to change the validity of that condition record using LSMW, too? Or can I only create new condition records?
    Thanks again
    Alicia

  • Purchase Info Record Change (ME12) using BDC

    Hi All,
    We are trying to change the Purchase Info Records using BDCs. We have about 20 condition records to change. Not all condition records change all the time. How can we use page control to identify the particular condition records that we want to change.
    Thanks
    Hari

    Hi Krishna,
    The BDC that we are trying to build will have the changes. For ex: When we created the info record (using a BDC) we had 15 condition records. This is coming from an external source.
    Now, there has been a change in the pricing (outside the system). This is communicated from the external system. We need to pinpoint which condition types to update in SAP, based on the values in the external system through the BDC.
    Regards
    Hari

Maybe you are looking for

  • Acrobat Plug-in Variable Refresh.

    Hi, I met a problem in local variable value refresh. I developed a plug-in based on the Basic Plug-in template in Samples from Acrobat. In the function which response to the click on user menu, I defined a local variable to record a user self defined

  • File Adapter Error FTPEx:553

    Hi I have cnfigured a file adapter and tryng to FTP a XML file and I am getting this error. Message processing failed. Cause: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Could not create file.: com.sap.aii.adapter.file.ftp.FTPEx: 553 Could not cre

  • Headphones for Apple Lossless

    Hi, I am wondering what headphones would be best to use on an ipod touch with apple lossless. By using apple lossless I obviously want a faithful reproduction of the original and to get the best out of it.

  • (!apple video) with gnome-mplayer & gecko-mediaplayer

    I'm trying to watch these video lectures for my trig class. Can't get them to play. installed firefox 3 (branded) along with gecko-mediaplayer and gnome-mplayer. I'm running arch32 and am having the same problem in kde as I had in gnome. Not sure wha

  • Error during Stock Transport Order plant assignment to vendor

    Dear All ,        I am configuring Inter Compay STO . For that I have created a Vendor(Plant 1000) for a company code 1010 and trying to assign Plant 1000 which belongs to Company code 1000.       But System is giving error Plant 1000  is already ass