User Access when User belongs to multiple teams

I have a user that belongs to two teams:  one of the teams has a task profile that includes only eAnalyze and is assigned a member access profile that has read only access to the application; the other team has a task profile that includes eAnalyze and SubmitData and is assigned a member access profile that has read and write access to the same application.
Because one of the teams has a lower member access profile of read only, does that mean that if the user tries to submit data, the submission will be denied?
In other words, if a user effectively has multiple user access profiles, does the LOWER access always win out?
Thanks in advance,
Valerie Dixon

Hi,
As already indicated, the higher profile wins. The best way to understand this is to create a union of the different profiles assigned to the same user through different teams. The result what you get after union is the final profile of the user.
Hope this helps.

Similar Messages

  • Form 11g - Is is possible to block specific forms access when user directly type form name in url ?

    Hi everyone,
    We have XXF000.fmb, XXF001.fmb , XXF002.fmb , XXF003.fmb in 6i.
    For migration to 11g , we recompile these forms and move fmx to 11g form server under form_path.
    In 6i , we login for validation & responsibilities control in XXF000, So we can use account info to verify if user have priviledge to access XXF001, XXF002 and XXF003.
    But in 11g , we can access these forms vial url request , such as : http://<host>:<port>/forms/frmservlet?form=XXF000   ; http://<host>:<port>/forms/frmservlet?form=XXF001  ... etc
    These may cause some unexpected access and operations in functions.
    Is is possible to block specific forms access when user directly type form name in url ?
    Thanks.
    Hendry

    You need to alter your formsweb.cfg file, either directly or through the Fusion web interface. You need to set the following parameters:
    #this sets the default form for your application
    form=yourmenuform.fmx
    #this stops these parameters being entered in the URL, seperate different parameters with commas
    restrictedURLparams=form,pageTitle,HTMLbodyAttrs,HTMLbeforeForm,HTMLafterForm,log

  • Change user mapping when user is owner

    I have a DB on a SQL 2008 Server that I need to remove the user mapping for the SA account.  The creator/owner of the DB is actually a Windows account but the user mapping for the SA account are DBO role and DBO schema.  For some reason, this is the only DB on this server that has the issue.  Any help from one of you SQL gurus would be much appreciated as I am NOT knowlegeable on this topic.  I just need to remove this mapping for the SA account to this specific DB.

    Leks,
    I'm purely looking for a way to remove the user mappings for the SA account to this one DB.  I know SA has access to everything and that it uses the dbo account to connect to each DB.  I need a way to remove the user mappings.  It's that simple.  The way our dev team coded the website, having the user mapping in place creates lots of issues which I'm not going to provide here.  This is the only DB that has this mapping.  All other DB's on the server don't have the mapping and those web tools are working fine.
    Because SA has the dbo user account mapping on this DB, it will not allow me to edit the mappings.  Here is the error message.
    TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio
    Drop failed for User 'dbo'.  (Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo)
    For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=10.0.2531.0+((Katmai_PCU_Main).090329-1015+)&EvtSrc=Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.ExceptionTemplates.FailedOperationExceptionText&EvtID=Drop+User&LinkId=20476
    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
    An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
    Cannot drop the user 'dbo'. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 15150)
    For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=10.00.2531&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=15150&LinkId=20476
    BUTTONS:
    OK
    If anyone has a procedure for what I'm trying to accomplish here, it would be greatly appreciated.  There must be a way to remove/edit this mapping.  It's the only DB that has it.  Why?  I don't know because I didn't create this actual DB.

  • Letting users access other users home directories

    Hello,
    I am currently setting up an xserve at a school and I am running into some problems. I want to let the group teachers be able to access all of the students home directories. I added to the permissions the group teachers for the users folders, but the permissions do not carry through all subfolders. What would be the best way to set up these permissions in tiger server?
    Thanks
    Robert

    Hi
    When sharing a desired folder for automounting networked home directores the default POSIX values are:
    Owner: root/admin R/W (can be either)
    Group: admin Read Only
    Everyone Read Only
    Going beyond this folder and you can then view the default attributes for individual folders. These should be:
    Owner: the persons name Read & Write
    Group: admin Read Only
    Everyone: None
    This is as it should be and you should leave these alone. In the situation you describe it makes sense to grant Read/Write access for teachers so as students work can be marked and/or assessed. In which cae you want to preserve the POSIX permissions but use an additional permissions model that allows access withour breaking the default permissions.
    10.4 Server allows for this as Access Control Lists (ACLs) are available once you enable them for the volume that has the shared folder for automounting networked home folders on it. WorkGroup Manager > Sharing > General. Select the volume and tick the box that says 'Enable Access Control Lists on this volume'. When you have done this, restart the Server. Enabling/Disabling ACLs on any volume should always be followed by a restart.
    On successful log in launch WorkGroup Manager, select Sharing, select folder you are interested and and select Access. Below the Standard POSIX model there is a window. This window is where you add desired users or groups (or a mix of both) and define what access they have to the selected folder. At the bottom of this window is a small gear wheel. Selecting this will show a small sub-menu where you can propagate permissions as well as viewing effective permissions. I would suggest you create a year group, add desired teachers to that year group and then add this year group to each desired year folder. Define your permissions and propagate them. You should now have at the end of this the default POSIX permissions for individual student folders still in place and honoured as well as overriding permission for teachers.
    Hope this helps, Tony

  • Exam 1Z0-007 and questions from Controlling User Access

    Hi,
    I am preparing for exam 1Z0-007 and going to give this exam in two weeks. I like to confirm if "Controlling User Access" topic is part of this exam 1Z0-007? I have checked on Oracle website and this topic is not a part if this exam anymore unless they add it later.
    Has anyone recently given this exam and were there any questions related to "Controlling User Access" or user Privileges?
    Thanks

    user10878991 wrote:
    Hi,
    I am preparing for exam 1Z0-007 and going to give this exam in two weeks. I like to confirm if "Controlling User Access" topic is part of this exam 1Z0-007? I have checked on Oracle website and this topic is not a part if this exam anymore unless they add it later.
    Has anyone recently given this exam and were there any questions related to "Controlling User Access" or user Privileges?
    ThanksI recommend people are very very very careful in answering this question as it could be very easy to breach one's certification candidate agreement.
    Rgds - bigdelboy.
    Edited by: bigdelboy on 27-Dec-2009 04:26
    It is certainly true the topic you mentioned is in ISBN: 007-219537-1 printed in 2001.
    It is also apparent, unless bigdelboy's eyeball is deceiving him, the topic does not appear in [http://education.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/db_pages.getpage?page_id=41&p_org_id=28&lang=US&p_exam_id=1Z0_007] which is authorative.
    I have not followed these things that closely until recently, however this will not be the only example of an OraclePress/Sybex book being left behind because of errata/topic updates etc. These often occur when the exams are update for new releases, eg from 10gR1 to 10gR2; or for when the exam moves from beta to production (sometimes these books are prepared and even pulbished while exam is in beta). In your case I suspect the change quite probably have occured when the exam moved from 9gR1 to 9gR2 or to better accomodate the WDP programme. The exam may also be influenced by the content of Oracle training courses that are being taught and from time to time these will be chaged for a variety of reasons.
    How you handle it is up to you ..... you may:
    - ignore these topics. IMHO you are always entitled to complain if questions asked did not sigificantly match the published topics and you feel this caused you to fail. (I assume the remedy would be a retake voucher). You can hit a comment button on the question and also a comment button the the end of the exam. This is a sort of negative approproach.
    - Go over these topics. If your're serious about Oracle you really need to understand this anyway. See it as an opportunity. A few hours revision ought tosee you able to answer 50% of he topics. This is a positive approach. And this if how certification study ought to be .... sometimes it good to investigate a non examined topic that is interesting.

  • What happens when multiple users access the same servlet?

    Do the users share all the same resources? Or is a new process generated for each user? I have a servlet that builds a string to return to the user and I only have myself to test, so I can't really see what happens when many users access the servlet. Is there a possibility that the string will get screwed up, like when dealing with multiple threads, or do all the users get their own resources and I don't have to worry about that?

    huh? if you can point a test servlet at it, you can point a browser at it (even if the servlet does not serve html it will run)
    try pasting the servlet URL into a web browser
    refreshing multiple browsers repeatedly could provide a manual test

  • Single User Story Multiple Teams

    We are having an issue in the web version of TFS where I have one user story that is being worked on by multiple teams.  The story is not large enough to break down to split into teams, but different people need to do something to complete it.  However,
    in the web version, we cannot see the tasks unless it is a child of the user story that is assigned to our area path.  How do we solve for this without having the overhead of having to create duplicate stories?

    Hi PaulVirginiaBeach,
    I'd like to know the version of TFS you're using, and whether the user story has an area which has multiple sub-areas. Based on your description, seems the scenario is as expected when you view the linked tasks of the user story when your accunt in a specific
    team.
    You can open the user story in team web access, and click the button of "create a copy of this work item". For the new created user stories, you can change its area values and linked tasks as your need.
    Best regards,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place. <br/> Click <a
    href="http://support.microsoft.com/common/survey.aspx?showpage=1&scid=sw%3Ben%3B3559&theme=tech"> HERE</a> to participate the survey.

  • How to avoid multiple users accessing same test data via parameterization in LR??

    i am using LR11.5, i have the following test data&colon;
    TestData
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    when i run this script from Controller with 3 users LR picks it as user1->1, user2->1, user3->1
    How do i achieve this case: user1->1, user2->2, user3->3 ??
    Any help would be great.

    I have a related question. i created 2 websites/domains then i went to users and created 2 seperate "network" users then i went to ftp and selected each website and added only user A to site A and user B to site B. what's weird is that when i try to ftp using either of the users it seems to land on the same site. i looked at shared security for the folders and it only shows user a on site a folder and user b on site b folders. am i doing somehitng wrong or is this how it works in mountain lion server? i just want to give the domain owner ftp access so they can manage their files and only thier files. i also had to turn on open directory so that it would not create a local user but a network user. do i need to turn that off and just deal with having a bunch of local users as ftp user? i want to host multiple websites on the server and NO users remote on to server besides ftp.
    edit 1: i only have 1 IP running on the server which i don't think it has any affect on this but thought i mention it :-)
    edit 2: i just noticed one more thing that may help. i used filezilla to remote in using both users, one at a time. it seems to allow both users in but then it shows same directories. i then created a file using the one that was not supposed to have acces and it never sows up. but if i remote desktop to server i can see the new file in the correct folder. so it may have something to d o with the directory listing.

  • Two user id are being created in BO when user is accessing from Window AD

    Hello Team,
    We are facing a problem in BO XIR3.
    1.     Where  users are login BO through Window AD login.
    2.     When users are login two idu2019s are being created in BO for that user.
    3.      One with the same name and another one with appending 0 at end.
    4.     For example if user  abcd login through window AD in BO there will be two idu2019s are created one is with abcd and another one is abcd0
    5.     Here users are already having access to BO thorugh AD aunthtication, 
                         For ex: User abcd is having access to BO through Win AD, but when he is login then one more id is being created with name abcd0 in BO.even the alias name is same for both of the ID.
                          here abcd is already in system abcd0 is being created in BO
    6     For second created id like abcd0 in BO rights are not given so user is not able to login.
    7.     Here when user abcd is login from AD his alias point to second created id in BO(abcd0) and this second id abcd0 is not having access to Bo so users are not able to access BO.
    Can you please let me know why it is happening, what went wrong and where ????
    Your help will be highly apprecaited

    OIM 11.1.1.3 is the version that we installed. USR_PASSWORD is not empty, after BP03 this appears to be a random password. it appears to be generated by oracle.iam.reconciliation.impl.ReconUserPasswordHandler. From the sequence of events it also appears that UserCreateLDAPPostProcessHandler is not getting called.
    password was same as AD username before bp03. it looks like your issue is different in this case.
    Below is the error stack that i see in oim diagnostic log.
    oracle.iam.platform.kernel.EventFailedException: Enabling failed because user SYNCTEST5 is not synchronized to the LDAP directory.
    at oracle.iam.ldapsync.impl.eventhandlers.user.util.LDAPUserHandlerUtil.enableUser(LDAPUserHandlerUtil.java:79)
    at oracle.iam.ldapsync.impl.eventhandlers.user.UserEnableLDAPHandler.execute(UserEnableLDAPHandler.java:143)
    at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrchProcessData.runPostProcessEvents(OrchProcessData.java:1153)
    at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrchProcessData.runEvents(OrchProcessData.java:703)
    at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrchProcessData.executeEvents(OrchProcessData.java:220)
    at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrchestrationEngineImpl.resumeProcess(OrchestrationEngineImpl.java:674)
    at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrchestrationEngineImpl.resumeProcess(OrchestrationEngineImpl.java:705)
    at oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl.OrhestrationAsyncTask.execute(OrhestrationAsyncTask.java:108)
    at oracle.iam.platform.async.impl.TaskExecutor.executeUnmanagedTask(TaskExecutor.java:100)
    at oracle.iam.platform.async.impl.TaskExecutor.execute(TaskExecutor.java:70)
    at oracle.iam.platform.async.messaging.MessageReceiver.onMessage(MessageReceiver.java:68)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)

  • How to setup for multiple users accessing same share?

    Hi!
    Recently picked up Mac Mini Server and have some configuration questions related to sharing files & information over the internet. Whenever possible, prefer to use the built-in features & tools, not 3rd party tools.
    My setup & needs are this:
    - Have folders & sub-folders with files to share.
    - Wish to give individuals access to the shared folders, each with their own account (and access logging).
    - Shared folder and files should be visible via web to authenticated users only (so no special client or setup is needed).
    Right now, have added a Website via Server.app that points to the folder with files to share, and that works somewhat, but doesn't support individual user accounts separately?
    Thought maybe to setup VPN but that seems like massive overkill for this (and is a pain in the butt for non-technical users to setup).
    Editing httpd.conf for user support is a possibility, but seems /etc/apache2/httpd.conf only applies to the default web server (on port 80) not the one i set up in Server.app?
    Can anyone recommend the best approach, given the above needs?

    I have a related question. i created 2 websites/domains then i went to users and created 2 seperate "network" users then i went to ftp and selected each website and added only user A to site A and user B to site B. what's weird is that when i try to ftp using either of the users it seems to land on the same site. i looked at shared security for the folders and it only shows user a on site a folder and user b on site b folders. am i doing somehitng wrong or is this how it works in mountain lion server? i just want to give the domain owner ftp access so they can manage their files and only thier files. i also had to turn on open directory so that it would not create a local user but a network user. do i need to turn that off and just deal with having a bunch of local users as ftp user? i want to host multiple websites on the server and NO users remote on to server besides ftp.
    edit 1: i only have 1 IP running on the server which i don't think it has any affect on this but thought i mention it :-)
    edit 2: i just noticed one more thing that may help. i used filezilla to remote in using both users, one at a time. it seems to allow both users in but then it shows same directories. i then created a file using the one that was not supposed to have acces and it never sows up. but if i remote desktop to server i can see the new file in the correct folder. so it may have something to d o with the directory listing.

  • User belonging to multiple groups

    Hi,
    If a user belongs to multiple workgroups, Podcast capture should ask him in wich blog he wants to publish its sequence... but it doesn't seem to work.
    So my question is : how to deal with that ?
    Thanks for your help,
    Nicolas

    Hi
    I know only 2 ways to add some dynamic: posting to user's blog, which supposes to consider that there is only one user who is able to post, otherwise to duplicate workflows and change the target group in it ($$Group Short Name$$ replaced by custom properties or if posted through webUI defined by new field, but it's reliability depends of the human factor..).
    In addition, i may ask you what do you mean by "it doesn't seem to work"..? Is Pc Capture supposed to work this way and ask at any moment to which group's blog the podcast needs to be sent when a user belongs to multiple groups ? That would be a terrific news, but i guess they would have announced it..
    ju
    Message was edited by: JulienC

  • Multiple User access in ATP

    I am designing custom ATP for our client. Actually, this logic accesses batch classification data and the calculation logic also differs.
    The concern that I have is if one user (say A) creates a sales order item and runs a successful Availability check and goes on to create second sales order item. simultaneously if another user (say B) comes to create new sales order item for same material. now the ATP quantity that second user gets should be less than the quantity confirmed by user A. But both the sales order have not been saved. so how do I block the quantities confirmed by A but yet not saved.
    Is there any special method for multiple user access at runtime.

    Thanks for ur reply. it was really helpful to gain more insights in my issue.
    1. For performance-related reasons, the only time when it makes sense to set the material block with quantity transfer is when it is common for several users to work on the same material simultaneously. And in VA01 there are many parallel Sales order creation
    2.You create a sales order for a material. During the availability check, this material is blocked. After the availability check is completed, the block is removed. The quantity reserved for this transaction is recorded in the blocking table. This information can be assessed by all others who are working with this material. If you save the order, the blocked entries are cancelled. this how Material block with quantity transfer in SD works.
    The concern that I have now is how to get Blocking Tables for transaction VA01.

  • How to work with multiple users accessing one database

    I am a newbie in oracle.
    I want to give access to my oracle database for more users.
    I created oracle connection with c# project. The application allow to user to insert data to a database table. Now I want to give access to the different users with a login. Is there any way to give access other users to the same database using their username and passwords?
    I'm confused. Please help.
    thank you.

    In the database, set up your data schema with data tables, views, and stored procedures to support your application.
    That schema owner should only be a trusted data administration person.  Let's call that schema APP_DATA.
    Then you set up another schema called APP_DATA_USERS with no privileges and no data.
    Then you create an Oracle ROLE object called APP_DATA_ROLE.
    You grant the app_data_role to the app_data_user account.
    You then grant object permissions in the APP_DATA_ROLE that you want the app_data_user to have for the app_data data objects, like Create SESSION, SELECT on TABLE X. or SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE on TABLE Y.
    Now the APP_DATA_USERS only has specific permissions needed on specific app_data data objects that you control by the app_data_role.
    Then your application only opens connections to Oracle via the single APP_DATA_USERS account
    which is constrained by the APP_DATA_ROLE permissions on what can be done in the data schema APP_DATA.
    in your web or app config you create the connection information for the single app_data_user account.
    Putting the database aside, you now create the application layer with login controls so many users can use the application.
    But when they need data, the application only makes a connection to the single APP_DATA_USERS account
    Oracle ODP.NET auto handles the multiple session connections by the multiple application users to the single APP_DATA_USERS account.
    In summary the multiuser access is controlled by the application
    all making connections (sessions) with a single, limited privilege app_data_user account on the database side.

  • Multiple simutaneously logged in users accessing AFP home directories?

    Hi,
    Many of our problems are described in this guy's blog:
    http://alblue.blogspot.com/2006/08/rantmac-migrating-from-afp-to-nfs.html
    The basic capability we want is to have multiple simultaneously logged in users to have access to their AFP mounted home directory, which is configured in a sane, out-of-the box setup using WGM and Server Admin.
    Multiple user access could take the form of FUS (fast user switching), or simply allowing a user to SSH into a machine that another user is already logged into and expect to be able to manipulate the contents of her home directory.
    From my extensive searches, I have no reason to believe this is currently possible with 10.4 Server and AFP.
    (here's the official word from apple: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25581)
    I've read that using NFS home directories will work, though.
    I want to believe that Apple has a solution for this by now (it's been almost a year since we first had difficulty), or at least a sanctioned workaround. If Apple doesn't have one, maybe someone else has come up with something clever. I find it hard to believe that more people haven't wanted this capability! (not being able to easily search the discussion boards doesn't help, though...)
    Thanks for your help!
    Adam

    Parallels Issue. Track at http://forum.parallels.com/showthread.php?p=135585

  • Error on load: System.IO.IOException: The process cannot access the file : error in event viewer when users want to view documents from this third party deployed scan solution

    Error on load: System.IO.IOException: The process cannot access the file
    '\\server1\SCANSHARED\.pdf' because it is being used by another process.
       at System.IO.__Error.WinIOError(Int32 errorCode, String maybeFullPath)
       at System.IO.FileStream.Init(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, Int32 rights, Boolean useRights, FileShare share, Int32 bufferSize, FileOptions options, SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES secAttrs, String msgPath, Boolean bFromProxy)
       at System.IO.FileStream..ctor(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, FileShare share, Int32 bufferSize, FileOptions options, String msgPath, Boolean bFromProxy)
       at System.IO.FileStream..ctor(String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, FileShare share)
       at System.IO.File.WriteAllBytes(String path, Byte[] bytes)
       at abc.Scan.Layouts.ICC.Scan.View.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e)
    I faced this  error in event viewer  when users want to view documents from this third party deployed scan solution
    here I have two WFS servers  and they configured with load balancing in F5 .
    when I enable both servers in F5 I receive this error messages in 2nd server,
    when users want to view documents
    adil

    Do you have antiVirus installed on the sharepoint servers?
    These folders may have to be excluded from antivirus scanning when you use file-level antivirus software in SharePoint. If these folders are not excluded, you may see unexpected behavior. For example, you may receive "access denied" error messages when files
    are uploaded.
    Please follow this KB and exclude the folders from Scanning.
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/952167
    Please remember to mark your question as answered &Vote helpful,if this solves/helps your problem. ****************************************************************************************** Thanks -WS MCITP(SharePoint 2010, 2013) Blog: http://wscheema.com/blog

Maybe you are looking for