User Dialog as SAP standard customizing

Hello,
If you want to create a transaction as standard customizing transaction, you have to use "view cluster" transaction SE64.
You define a tree at the left of screen with different relation table and you use standard dialog table SM30 with your different view of table.

HI Kushan,
This sounds like it might be the correct behavior. When you install an ADD-ON into SAP, the install process does not know which client you have saved your default customization settings into so it is likely going to put these into client 000 or 001.
Does that help?
J. Haynes

Similar Messages

SAP Standard Customizing is missing after the Add-on installation

Dear Experts,
We have an ERP 6.0 EHP4 system and it has been using for a while. We have done an AFS 6.4 Add-on implementation on top of the ERP system.
We have a configuration only client 200 on the system and that was already there before we did the add-on installation.
Once the add-on installation is completed, we could see most of the SAP Standard configuration which should come along with the add-on is not there in client 200. But everything is there on Client 000 without any problem.
What could be the problem ? have we missed anything here.
I have found a note : 337623 which ask you to manually populate the configuration using SFW5.
I'm not very clear about this. Should we really do this SFW5 ? or is there any other way that we coul'd get those configurations in to client 200 where we have years old other configurations.
Appreciate of you could kindly give some ideas as to how I should get this problem fixed.
Thanks a a lot in advance.
Best Regards
Kushan

HI Kushan,
This sounds like it might be the correct behavior. When you install an ADD-ON into SAP, the install process does not know which client you have saved your default customization settings into so it is likely going to put these into client 000 or 001.
Does that help?
J. Haynes

How to populate custom fields in SAP standard Basic type DELFOR01(E1EDK09)

I've a requirement to include and populate 2 custom fields in SAP standard basic type DELFOR01 and Segment E1EDK09 (it is at hierarchy level 1 ) .
The requirement looks very simple but for this, as per my knowledge, I have to create a new Basic type with the copy of segment E1EDK09 and attach it to outbound process code and write my own function module to populate the segments.
It seems ok but the there are some existing codes in the user-exits for the SAP standard function module.These codes will not get triggered.(Or I've copy the user-exits code in my FM)
Can we do it any other way to handle this kind of situation?
Thanks in advance for your suggestions and help.

Hi Phani,
You have done it correctly. ECC additional data to be moved to EWM, 1. you need to enhance the CIF for master data/ bapi to populate the data in the custom field in EWM. 2. Make your your are not enhancing only one structure. You need to do it in the CI includes so that the field is available in all the related tables/structures.
3. The BAPI/FM which updated these tables will take care automatically to update the custom field data if the field is correctly added in all the tables.
4. If the custom fields are added correctly and still the data is not getting saved , then need to check the mapping of the custom field and bepi extension.
Let me know if this helps.

Can we execute an SAP Standard ABAP Programme from a Custom BAPI?

Hi,
We have a requirement in our project where in we have to execute an SAP Standard ABAP report. We need to execute it from a Portal by click of a button.
What we are thinking is that if we have a custom BAPI which triggers the execution of ABAP report, we can execute the BAPI from the Portal using Adaptive RFC Function call by developing a custom Web Dynpro Java application.
So, my question is it possible to execute an ABAP report making sending required input parameters to the ABAP report from the BAPI. If so, how can we achieve this?
Regards
Ram

Hi Brad,
Thanks for your quick response. Actually, it is not exactly a report. We are trying to call an SAP Program related to SAP Business Workflow.
When the user clicks on Approve or Reject buttons on the SAP GUI, this program will be called and exectured which inturn updates many Project System Tables.
What we are trying to do is that we had developed a custom Web Dynpro Java Application for achieving the SAP Workflow. Instead of reinventing the wheel, we just want to use already existing SAP Program which updates the Project Systems tables.
So, from the Portal Workflow Inbox when the user clicks on the Approve or Reject buttons, we would like to call a custom BAPI which will execute this program.
Could you please explain in detail how to achieve this? Thanks in advance.
Regards
Venkat

SAP Standard Workflow for PR Release (with user exit)

Hi SAP WF Gurus,
Good day!
I just wanted to check with you if you have ever used a user exit in the activation of the standard workflow for PR (overall ( release. What we have is a two0step approval process wherein each level has a proxy/alternate approver. We used the available user exit to accommodate this customer requirement since the standard release would only allow us to define 1 approver as a prerequisite for the next level. We were able to execute this on the first level approval; however, we observed that the workflow is not anymore triggered (i.e. does not send work items to agents) for the level 2 release. My questions therefore are:
1. How to set up SWEC? I already executed SWELS and SWEL to check if the events are being created and event linkage is automatically deactivated after running into an error regarding the binding...My initial SWEC setup is for BANF BUS2105 RELEASED On Change. I am assuming that since the workflow was released from the first level, this should be the starting point
2. How to rectify the binding error? I already executed automatic binding in the WF header for the start events but still face it
Your inputs/comments are most welcome
Regards,
DeLo

Just to add:
The error that I am encountering in the second run/cycle for the PR approval workflow is Import container contains errors (are any obligatory elements missing?)
Basically, WS20000077 will be executed if an approval level is seen. Once the approval is made, then the workflow is also completed. However, for multiple approvers, I only get to execute successfully the first level approval. The succeeding levels are encountering errors as stated above

How to add custom fields to the sap standard program ukm_bp_display

How to add new custom fields to the sap standard program ukm_bp_display .
could u please any one help me on this?

Hello Kumar,
You have to modify below structure, as this structure is providing the field catalog for output display (ALV).
Here you can see there are a lot of include structures, so if you want to add fields in the output display you can add those fileds as an append structure to any of the below mentioned structures (Like ukm_s_account, ukm_s_bp_cms_sgm etc as per your requiremnt and positon at which you need to dispaly your fields.)
DATA: BEGIN OF gt_grid_alv OCCURS 0.
       partner LIKE but000-partner,
       credit_sgmnt LIKE ukmbp_cms_sgm-credit_sgmnt.
        INCLUDE STRUCTURE ukm_s_account.
        INCLUDE STRUCTURE ukm_s_bp_cms_sgm.
DATA:   credit_sgmnt_txt LIKE ukmcred_sgm0t-credit_sgmnt_txt.
      Gruppe Vector
        INCLUDE STRUCTURE ukm_s_bp_vector.
      Gruppe OBL = Obligo
      include structure UKM_S_BP_CMS_MALUSDSP_OUT.
        INCLUDE STRUCTURE ukm_s_display_segment.
        INCLUDE STRUCTURE ukm_s_bp_cms.
        INCLUDE STRUCTURE bus000_dat.
*DATA:   icon(4).
      Gruppe RAST (Raster)
DATA:
         rast01 LIKE ukm_s_display_segment-AMOUNT_GRID,
         rast02 LIKE ukm_s_display_segment-AMOUNT_GRID,
         rast03 LIKE ukm_s_display_segment-AMOUNT_GRID,
         rast04 LIKE ukm_s_display_segment-AMOUNT_GRID,
         rast05 LIKE ukm_s_display_segment-AMOUNT_GRID,
         rast06 LIKE ukm_s_display_segment-AMOUNT_GRID.
DATA:    rast2_6 LIKE ukm_s_display_segment-AMOUNT_GRID.
"Summe raster 2 bis 6
DATA: END OF gt_grid_alv.
Another way is you can go to SE38, and you can create implicit enhancements.One enhancement point is available here in this required area. so create an implementation and add your fileds with data types.This way is also simple.
Hope this will solve yiour problems.
Regards,
Antony Thomas

How to find all those list of SAP standard and custom objects that are changed from a specific point of time

Hi all,
Please let me know the process to track or find all the SAP Standard and custom objects. that got changed from a specific point of time.
Is there any function module or any table where this change log is maintained.?
I just only need the details ,wheather that SAP standard or Custom object has got changed or not.
Thanks in advance

Hi RK v ,
I really don't know what your actual requirement is , but if you want to know the objects as per the modification , then transport request will be much help to you .
Have a look into table E070 and E071 .
Regards ,
Yogendra Bhaskar

Need to find All Custom Reports which are based on SAP standard reports

Hi Specialists,
I would like to find out all the customized reports which are a copy of SAP standard reports in the client's system.
For Eg. RPCP11G0 is the SAP standard report which has been customized & it's code has been re-written into a Custom report i.e. ZGBPPYMP001_P11D.
I would like to know all such occurences in the system.
Steps already done:
1) Tried searching with RPR_ABAP_SOURCE_SCAN & RS_ABAP_SOURCE_SCAN.
Please suggest .
Thanks
Abhinav.

it's only possible with an tool-program
when your developers have not change the line with the REPORT-command.
e.g.
standard-report is RAGITT01
copy is ZC_RAGITT01 or sth like this
but report line is unchanged in copy: "REPORT RAGITT01 MESSAGE-ID AB..."
solution:
select all reports from TRDIR/TADIR from your Z/Y-device classes
and analyse the reports with
read report ZC_RAGITT01 into wa.
and use find for searching 'report-command'.
and check whether the result of that finding is an standard abap
hope that helps
Andreas

You are not recognized as a user in the SAP customer notification system

Hello,
we are in OSS registered as CCC. I am able to send notifications from our SolMan to OSS with components(instalations) which are registered under out SAP customer number(our SolMan instalation etc.).
When I want to sned notification for our customers to OSS but with component of our customer(he has another SAP number, his instalation) then I got an error message
You are not recognized as a user in the SAP customer notification system:
You are not recognized as a user in the SAP customer notification system
Message no. DNO158
Diagnosis
No address data exists for this logon user in the SAP problem notification system.
The function you activated could not be executed.
Activated function Diagnosis
Send notification to SAP The notification was saved, but could
not be sent to SAP.
Update notification at SAP The notification was not updated to
reflect the SAP version.
Check for changes The system cannot compare the notification
with the current version at SAP.
Request list of the The notifications that you sent to SAP
notifications contained cannot be updated.
in the SAP problem notification system.
Procedure
Contact your system administrators.
Could you help me please?
view V_AISAPCUSTNOS ist filled with our customer numbers, I am in AISUSER...
Thanks Miloslav Pudil

Hello Miloslav,
We have the same problem.
Somebody knows how can we resolve this?
Thanks,
Diego.

Custom workflow integrated into SAP Standard

I have a requirement were the business would like a workflow to create material master, but prior to actually creating the material they have a form that needs passed around and approved my many business units. Once all approvals are obtained a material master can be created. What I would like is to create a custom BOR and event to route the form and get approvals, but I would like to some how carry over or link this custom workflow with the SAP standard for material master so you can view the log of who and what was approved for this material. Any suggestions?

Hi,
Create a workflow or copy the SAP standard. Insert a fork step with the number for branches corresponding to the number of approvals you need. Say you need 5 approvals, have 5 branches and 5 required for completion.
In each branch use a Form step or a custom method to get the approval.
After the fork has completed then insert your step which call the CREATE method for your material.
Everything will be contained in the workflow log.
Regards,
Eddie

SAP standard FM or BAPI for getting customer details from condition record

Can someone suggest some SAP standard BAPI or FM with the help of which we can get the customer details of all it's pricing conditions maintained in condition tables provided we have the condition record number with us.

Hi,
look at the below BAPI's
BAPI_CUSTOMER_DISPLAY
BAPI_CUSTOMER_GETDETAIL2
Regards
Sudheer

How to make use of variable present in sap standard FM to custom badi.

Hi All,
Scenario: I am using a transaction which makes use of SAP standard FM. Also I have used a zbadi to achieve my requirement. While debugging, I found that when the control goes to zbadi, i am unable to make use of the variables which are defined in standard FM.
Now my requirement is to make use of variables present in standard FM into zbadi. Can anyone suggest me how to achieve this?
Thanks in Advance......[:)]
Regards,
Vinit

if your system is NetWeaver 7.0 (ECC 6...), then you can use enhancement framework to add your code to the function module.
Otherwise, you can only access them if they have global scope, using ASSIGN ('(SAPLfunction group name)GLOBALVARNAME') TO <fieldsymbol> (be careful, you could change variable value, so make sure you don't)

Web Feel of SAP standard or custom transaction.

Hi All Experts,
I have a reuirement to make Web feel of Transaction such as VA01, VA02.
In CRM we get the Jave web feel in Gui page. Can we get such Web feel in SAP standard transaction..
Please advice and if any third party packages are available please let me know.
Thanks in advance..
Kind regards
Manglesh

Hi,
    If you are using ECC 6 or further, it is possible using Internet services,
for this create 1 ITS using se80, there mension these parameter, do required BASIS settings and now execute your ITS, you can use any standard transaction on web.
parameters to update in ITS
~AUTOSCROLL     0
~GENERATEDYNPRO     1
~LISTSCROLLING     0
~POPUPS     1
~STYLE     DHTML
~TRANSACTION     VA01
Thanks,
Anmol.

Do you trust the SAP standard rule set ?

Hello all,
I have the impression that, too often, the SAP standard ruleset has been taken for granted : upload, generate and use. Here is a post as to why not to do so. Hopefuly, this will generate a interesting discussion.
As I have previously stated in other threads, you should be very careful accepting the SAP standard rule set without reviewing it first. Before accepting it, you should ensure that your specific SAP environment has been reflected in the functions. The 2 following questions deal with this topic :
1. what is your SAP release ? ---> 46C is different than ECC 6.0 in terms of permissions to be included in the function permission tab. With every SAP release, new authorization objects are linked to SAP standard tcodes. Subsequently some AUTHORITY-CHECK statements have been adapted in the ABAP behind the transaction code. So, other authorizations need to provided from an implementation point of view (PFCG). And thus, from an audit perspective (GRC-CC), other settings are due when filtering users' access rights in search for who can do what in SAP.
2. what are your customizing settings and master data settings ? --> depending on these answers you will have to (de)activate certain permissions in your functions. Eg. are authorization groups for posting periods, business areas, material types, ... being used ? If this is not required in the SAP system and if activated in SAP GRC function, then you filter down your results too hard, thereby leaving certain users out of the audit report while in reality they can actually execute the corresponding SAP functionality --> risk for false negatives !
Do not forget that the SAP standard ruleset is only an import of SU24 settings of - probably - a Walldorf system. That's the reason SAP states that the delivered rule set is a starting point.
So, the best practice is :
a. collect SAP specific settings per connector in a separate 'questionnaire' document, preferably structured in a database
b. reflect these answers per function per connector per action per permission by correctly (de)activating the corresponding permissions for all affected functions
You can imagine that this is a time-consuming process due to the amount of work and the slow interaction with the Java web-based GRC GUI. Therefore, it is a quite cumbersome and at times error-prone activity ...... That is, in case you would decide to implement your questionnaire answers manually. There are of course software providers on the market that can develop and maintain your functions in an off-line application and generate your rule set so that you can upload it directly in SAP GRC. In this example such software providers are particularly interesting, because your questionnaire answers are structurally stored and reflected in the functions. Any change now or in the future can be mass-reflected in all (hundreds / thousands of) corresponding permissions in the functions. Time-saving and consistent !
Is this questionnaire really necessary ? Can't I just activate all permissions in every function ? Certainly not, because that would - and here is the main problem - filter too much users out of your audit results because the filter is too stringent. This practice would lead too false negatives, something that auditors do not like.
Can't I just update all my functions based on my particular SU24 settings ? (by the way, if you don't know what SU24 settings are, than ask your role administrator. He/she should know. ) Yes, if you think they are on target, yes you can by deleting all VIRSA_CC_FUNCPRM entries from the Rules.txt export of the SAP standard rule set, re-upload, go for every function into change mode so that the new permissions are imported based on your SU24 settings. Also, very cumbersome and with the absolute condition that you SU24 are maintained excellent.
Why is that so important ? Imagine F_BKPF_GSB the auth object to check on auth groups on business areas within accounting documents. Most role administrator will leave this object on Check/Maintain in the SU24 settings. This means that the object will be imported in the role when - for example - FB01 has been added in the menu. But the role administrator inactivates the object in the role. Still no problem, because user doesn't need it, since auth groups on business areas are not being used. However, having this SU24 will result in an activated F_BKPF_GSB permission in your GRC function. So, SAP GRC will filter down on those users who have F_BKPF_GSB, which will lead to false negatives.
Haven't you noticed that SAP has deactivated quite a lot of permissions, including F_BKPF_GSB ? Now, you see why. But they go too far at times and even incorrect. Example : go ahead and look deeper into function AP02. There, you will see for FB01 that two permissions have been activated. F_BKPF_BEK and F_BKPF_KOA. The very basic authorizations needed to be able to post FI document are F_BKPF_BUK and F_BKPF_KOA. That's F_BKPF_BUK .... not F_BKPF_BEK. They have made a mistake here. F_BKPF_BEK is an optional auth object (as with F_BKPF_GSB) to check on vendor account auth groups.
Again, the message is : be very critical when looking at the SAP standard rule set. So, test thoroughly. And if your not sure, leave the job to a specialized firm.
Success !
Sam

Sam and everyone,
Sam brings up some good points on the delivered ruleset. Please keep in mind; however, that SAP has always stated that the delivered ruleset is a starting point. This is brought up in sap note 986996     Best Practice for SAP CC Rules and Risks. I completely agree with him that no company should just use the supplied rules without doing a full evaluation of their risk and control environment.
I'll try to address each area that Sam brings up:
1. Regarding the issue with differences of auth objects between versions, the SAP delivered rulset is not meant to be version specific. We therefore provide rules with the lowest common denominator when it comes to auth object settings.
The rules were created on a 4.6c system, with the exception of transactions that only exist in higher versions.
The underlying assumption is that we want to ensure the rules do not have any false negatives. This means that we purposely activate the fewest auth objects required in order to execute the transaction.
If new or different auth object settings come into play in the higher releases and you feel this results in false positives (conflicts that show that don't really exist), then you can adjust the rules to add these auth objects to the rules.
Again, our assumption is that the delivered ruleset should err on the side of showing too many conflicts which can be further filtered by the customer, versus excluding users that should be reported.
2. For the customizing settings, as per above, we strive to deliver rules that are base level rules that are applicable for everyone. This is why we deliver only the core auth objects in our rules and not all. A example is ME21N.
If you look at SU24 in an ECC6 system, ME21N has 4 auth objects set as check/maintain. However, in the rules we only enable one of the object, M_BEST_BSA. This is to prevent false negatives.
3. Sam is absolutely right that the delivered auth object settings for FB01 have a mistake. The correct auth object should be F_BKPF_BUK and not F_BKPF_BEK. This was a manual error on my part. I've added this to a listing to correct in future versions of the rules.
4. Since late 2006, 4 updates have been made to the rules to correct known issues as well as expand the ruleset as needed. See the sap notes below as well as posting Compliance Calibrator - Q2 2008 Rule Update from July 22.
1083611 Compliance Calibrator Rule Update Q3 2007
1061380 Compliance Calibrator Rule Update Q2 2006
1035070 Compliance Calibrator Rule Update Q1 2007
1173980 Risk Analysis and Remediation Rule Update Q2 2008
5. SAP is constantly working to improve our rulesets as we know there are areas where the rules can be improved. See my earlier post called Request for participants for an Access Control Rule mini-council from January 28, 2008. A rule mini-council is in place and I welcome anyone who is interested in joining to contact me at the information provided in that post.
6. Finally, the document on the BPX location below has a good overview of how companies should review the rules and customize them to their control and risk environment:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/bpx-grc
Under Key Topics - Access Control; choose document below:
    o GRC Access Control - Access Risk Management Guide   (PDF 268 KB)
The access risk management guide helps you set up and implement risk
identification and remediation with GRC Access Control.

How to allow user to change SAP Portal password by themselves

We would like to allow user to change SAP Portal password by themselves. However, I added role Manage_My_Password and Manage_My_Profile to a user account. After logoned with this user account and opened the option 'Personalize'. I only find the page allow me to customize the page layout. But I haven't find tab for changing profile and password.
Pls advise.
Thanks.
Edward

Hi Edwar,
You can hide the pages from portal personalization workset. copy the workset and select the page and click on property -> select Invisible in Navigation Areas ->yes
You can find the workset under
Portal content->End user content->Standard Portal Users>Workset->Portal Personalization
If you want a custom developed application fro change password see the below blog
A Change Password Application
Hope it helps
Regards
Santosh

User Dialog as SAP standard customizing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for