User Status - Restrict FI Posting

Hi All,
The scnerio in my project is as follows,
After completion of the project system status set as "TECO". I am not going to set system status as "CLSD"
After TECO, system is allowing FI-Postings to WBS Elements. I nned to restrict this posting through User Status.
1. How to go ahead?
2. If I set user status to Project definition, Will it apply to all WBS elements?
Regards
Suresh

Hi ,
For creating user status we have to  use transaction  OK02
Here create a user status profile with user status NFIP- FI posting not allowed.
Select object type as WBS element and once u double click on the NFIP - FI posting not allowed u can see the system status. For the system status TECO select the radio button set. So that when u do the TECO for WBS the NFIP status will be activated.Also similarly for FI posting options select forebidden option against the individual system status.
This user status profile u have to assign to the project profile.
2.If I set user status to Project definition, Will it apply to all WBS elements? As per me this is not possible. Only PREL ie partial realeas of Project defn can restrict release of project.
Rgds

Similar Messages

  • No user status in 1st post

    ← Every post shows the poster's name, avatar, no of posts, and join date.  Except for the topic starter; these info are missing in the original post of each topic.
    Suggestion: make the avatar smaller, so that there is room for these info.  Why does the OP's avatar need to be four times the size of all subsequent posts?

    Pat,
    Until fairly recently, the originator had their post count show. In most instances, I seldom bother, but when it's their first post, I, and several others, like to extend a "Welcome to the Forums."
    Have just noticed that there are many recent posts, where the poster's "count" is no longer shown.
    Not sure if we can infere that it's their first post, or perhaps the post count has just been dropped completely, though I do see it for many posters and in several threads?
    As a for instance, in this thread: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1030392?tstart=0
    the OP had no post count showing. Now, with their Reply, it shows "2 Posts," so that WAS their first post.
    Hunt

  • Error: User Status OUTS is active

    When using IW42 to enter completion comments on a work order, I enter the work order number and green check it.  If the work order does not have an underlying notification, I get a 'User status OUTS is active (QNF #1)' error (actually, two identical errors are displayed).
    Any ideas?
    David Macindoe

    Paul, Naresh,
    I got it.  My default notification type was set to M2.  In my organization an M2 notification is created with an OUTS user status set and the notification must be "approved" (user status set to APPR) before further processing can be done.
    M3 notifications have no such user status restrictions to deal with  They're created and the user is off and running.
    With my default notification type set to M2, IW42 couldn't get past the user status restrictions.
    We tell users to set their default notification type to M3.  I'm not sure how mine got set to M2.
    I appreciate both of your help.  You zeroed me in on the real issue.
    Thanks again!
    David

  • How to restrict manual setting of User Status?

    Hi,
    I have created an User Profile where a particular User Status is "set" based on the Business Transaction "Release".
    However, we are also allowed to set this User Status manually without carrying out the Business Transaction "Release".
    How do I restrict manual setting of those User Statuses that are "set" based on a Business Transaction?
    Raj

    Pete,
    I did read that post. But it is about providing authorisation to set a Status for an User.
    The case I am referring is, an User Status is auto set by a Bus. Trans Release. But I am also permitted to set the status transition manually. This way, Users tend to skip Releasing the Service Order. This is affecting upstream processes.
    Is there a way where we can restrict manual setting of User Statuses that have to be normally auto set by Bus. Transactions?
    Raj

  • Restrict the posting period opening and closing for some users

    Dear SAP gurus,
    I want to restrict some users to open the posting period and for some users close posting periods. I knew that these can be done through authorization group. Pls explain how to create authorization groups and how to use those?  Anybody can help me out?
    Regards,
    Venkata Reddy

    Dear Venkatareddy,
    There are two sets of period in OB52. The first set of "From" and "To" is for the authorised group and second set is for the non authorised group. In the "Authorisation Group" (last column) give some 4 charecters name. Say "FICO".
    Now ask the basis to attach the object "FICO" for the users who are authorised say user1, user 2 and user3.
    Now in the first set of period you can maintain say 1 2008 to 16 2008 and in the second set 1 2008 to 1 2008.
    So except user1,2 and 3, all the others can post only in 1 2008. Whereas users 1,2 and3 can post in all the periods of 2008.
    Assign points if useful
    regards
    Venkatesh

  • In MIGO , How to restrict the user to change the posting date?

    Hi All,
    In MIGO , I want the user to restrict from change in posting date i.e. user should not be able to change the posting date. The system should take to-day date only as a posting date.
    Thanks in advance.
    GP

    Hi,
              check this MBCF0005.
    EXIT_SAPM07DR_001.
    BADI being <b>MB_MIGO_BADI.</b>
    <b>Reward points</b>
    Regads

  • How to restrict the posting document from the parked user

    Hi All,
    Please help me in the below requirement
    The requirement is, need to restrict the posting of document by the same user, who has parked the document.
    For this I did the code changes in BTE: 00001140 by copying the function module:
    u2018SAMPLE_INTERFACE_00001140u2019 into new function module asu2019 Y_IB_FI_PROCESS_00001140u2019
    In this I have restricted as
    IF ( sy-tcode = FV60 or
    sy-tcode = FV50 or
        sy-tcode = FBV0 ).
    IF i_parked = u2018xu2019. " document has already been parked
          READ TABLE t_bkpf INDEX 1.
          IF t_bkpf-usnam EQ sy-uname. " park user = current user ?
            t_exctab-okcod = 'BU'.    " do not allow to post
            APPEND t_exctab.
          ENDIF.
        ENDIF.
    This function module is getting trigger while parking and posting the documents
    While posting the document, the parameter i_parkedu2019 is not getting the values as u2018Xu2019,
    To get the values as u2018Xu2019 for the parameter: i_parked what can I do?
    Can you please help me, is there configuration side need check?
    Or do I need to write code some where else.
    Thanks in Advance
    Rambabu .A
    Cross-post

    Hi
    Well, in such a case, it might be justified... BUt again, I would ask how would you differentiate between What USER1 can park and what can he post?... Certainly, it would be by means of fields like Doc Type, etc...
    Else, if you leave it to the discretion of USER1 and give him both the authorizations, why would he like to park when he can post the doc? 
    Anyways, now coming to the BTE, each BTE uses a structure... For eg: BTE 1120 uses BSEG_SUBST... If the fields you desire are not available in the structure, then you can also enhance the structure... See if you can enhance the structures involved and achieve the result
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Restricting User Status in CRM

    Hi Experts
    We have a requirement in SAP CRM to restrict User statuses so that when the CRM Order is in a certain status, no other statuses are visible as a drop-down.
    In above screenshot, if status is "Dealer Submitted" the rest of the status should not be displayed.
    Kindly advise.
    Thanks
    Susmita

    Hello Sushmita,
    You can use authorization object  B_USERSTAT. With this authorization object you protect the setting or deletion of user status in the general status management of orders, projects, etc.
    Authorization codes are created in SPRO --> SAP Customizing Implementation Guide --> Customer Relationship Management --> Transactions --> Basic Settings --> Status Management --> Define Status Authorization Keys
    If you assign an authorization code for a certain status, this means that only users who have authorization object B_USERSTAT assigned to one of their roles, and are authorized to 01 (create or generate) for the specified authorization code, will be able to set the status. All other users will not. Hope this input was helpful for you.
    Thanks!
    Neha Gupta

  • Restriction of user status in service order for billing due list

    Dear CRM Experts,
    I have configured status profile for service order as OPEN,INPROCESS and Completed and have assigned this to the service order transaction type.
    Now once i save a service order without errors ,the system is automatically generating abilling document in  billing due list TX:BEA_DL_01 even though the user status assigned to it is OPEN ,INPROCESS AND COMPLETED.
    According to our client requirement ,a billing document has to be created in Billing due list if the User status assigned to it is COMPLETED only.
    Please suggest the solution.
    Bye,
    Madhav

    Hi Nanda,
    As per your last reply, for some Service Orders you are unable to change the Status. Can you have check whether those service Orders are error free?
    Sometimes, when there are errors in service orders or in 1Orders you cannot change the status from In Process or Open even when you have released certain Items.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Samantak.

  • System shud restrict stock posting of 04 inspection lot

    Dear ALL,
    Pain Area - whenevr Process order get release 03 inporcess inspection lot generates and after Process order get confrimed
    O4 inspection lot generates , Evry time we use to process 04 Inpsection lot and then stock posted from Quality to Unrestrcted and finally , urestricted stock goes to market . NOw 03 inpsection lot remains in Created status , system not restriced for 04 activity i.e stock posting . So I want to restrict stock posting of 04 inspection lot  if 03 inpsection lot doesnt have UD status .
    please suggest .
    Regards,
    Prerna Verma

    Do you want to put a hard error when UD is taken for O4 lots, if the corresponsding SF lot is not released? This will stop users releasing the 04 lots and personally I am not in favor of writing a piece of code in User exit at UD and stiop the release of a Finished Batch.
    I have worked on similar requirement where users used to check manually the SF batch - UD prior to release a Finished Lot. to reduce the manual work and data transpose errors, we have used a calculated char. SF batch released? and assigned it in the finished product inspection paln.
    We copied the standard FM - QEFC_FORMULA_CALC_EXAMPLE and written a logic to look the consumed SF batch is released or not .The Function Module is assigned to a Calculated Characteristic u2013 the user will then be able to Calculate the characteristic during Results Recording of a batch of Finished Product to determine the Release Status of the issued batch of Semi-Finished material, as opposed to having to look it up manually.  We looked at the Q-score to decide a SF batch is released , rejected or UD not taken. The Function Module used the name of the Master Inspection Characteristic (MIC) and the Material Type of the Inspection Lot to determine the Inspection Lot Q-Score to return.
    With this set up you will not issue a hard error at the time of UD for Finsihed batch at the same time users will know the SF batch status when the results were recorded for Finished batch.
    If your requirement is a Hard error, simply go for the user exit suggested and write a logic to look for the Semi Finished Batch consumed.
    Hope it helps.
    Thanks,
    Ram

  • Message M7 - 665 -Batch & has the status restricted-use )

    Hi
    Batches with are reached expiry date are giving Restricted status by using deadline monitoring transaction. (QA07 & QA05)
    With restricted status Batches are allowing for the Consumption to the order/ cost center and also for the 311Movement.
    In order to control this consumption we made the information message in to Error message. (M7 -665 -Batch & has the status <restricted-use>).
    This setting done in MM-SPRO- Inventory management ---Define attributes of system messages.
    This setting is applicable for all the Movement types.
    Now the requirement is For the Movement type 344, 551 exemption need to be given so that posting to be happen from restricted status to Blocked stock / Scrap.
    How to Exempt the 344, 551 From the Message u2013M7 -665 Category?
    Regards
    Sasikanth

    You cannot make exceptions. If you want the error message selectively, use the user exit at the time of goods issue. Here you can issue the error message by movement type.
    Lakshman

  • How to update user status in CRM Order depending the delivery status in R/3

    Hi All,
    In my scenario the partial delivery allowed to the customer while creating the CRM Order. But as per my requirement the status should be updated when the complete order and delivery takes place.
       Let me describe you clearly:
    Suppose I want to deliver 5 quantities products to the customer but initially I want to deliver only 3 quantities and rest 2 quantities later. When I do the post goods issue of 3 quantities in R/3 system the status should not change in CRM system. When I will do the rest 2 quantities in post goods issue in R/3 then the user status should change in CRM Order. But in current when I do the delivery of 3 quantities the user status is changing in CRM Order.
    I need the user status should change in CRM only when the entire deliverytakes place in R/3.
    Thanx
    Chinmaya

    Whenever an item is fully delivered, by standard, a "Completely Delivered" status will be updated into the item. If the I suppose by referring to that you will know an item is partial or completely delivered. When all items in the order is fully delivered, the standard header status will set to "Completed". So, you will also know if the whole order is partial or completely delivered.
    If you want to add a user status, the simplest, you can make use of the ORDER_SAVE Badi. Just call the function CRM_STATUS_MAINTAIN_OW. You can update both header and item status.

  • Control of TASK (Release/Complete) from User Status at Header Notification

    Dear All,
    I have configured a user status profile  for a notification type. In this a status is set to restrict following for Task used in Notification.
    Complete Task : Forbidd.
    Delete Task: Forbidd.
    Release Task: Allowed.
    Task Successful : Forbidd.
    even after above setting done for the user status , iam not able to restrict the functions(mentioned above) for notification. Can any one tell me how to achieve this?
    Raj

    Raj,
    Generally speaking, header user-statuses cannot control functions at a lower level (and vica versa) e.g. tasks, operations etc
    You can control this via user-exits/BADIs (see link at the top of this forum)
    PeteA

  • Need FM for reading user status at run time in CRMD_ORDER txn.

    hello all,
    i need to know the FM for finding the user status on the screen.
    i know there are FM's for finding the values on subject and external reference fields. similarly i want it for user status .please help me in this regard....
    Thanks,
    Sreekanth.

    Hey Shiva,
    The FM for finding user status is CRM_STATUS_READ_OW
    Please Reward for usefull usefull post..
    Regards,
    Anand..

  • User status linking between wbs and network

    Dear All,
    I got one requirement in which i am using user status at wbs level to block all the transactions. Now the  problem which i am getting is that even though i am maintaining the user status at wbs level, users are able to post the data on network activities. If i am maintaining the user status at activity level than i am able to stop the same.
    Kindly suggest cant we maintain user status at wbs level and stop fi posting at activity level. Is there any way to achieve this.
    Regards
    Abhishek Sinha

    Dear Abhishek,
    Use same sataus profile on Neworks also after having included Network activity & Network header as affected object types in OK02
    regards,
    Sam L.

Maybe you are looking for