Users are not importing from BW to bobj

Hi Experts,
I am working on bobj 4.0 and bw 7.0 i am facing an issue while importing users from bw .i can import roles but i can not  see the users .In Bw the roles have users but when i import them to bobj  i can see only roles but not users ?????

Hello,
I know this post is from almost 2 years back.
But we are running into an issue in BOBJ 4.1 SP2 with role and user import.
When we import roles from BW to BOBJ from SAP Authentication. All the roles are imported fine.
The user gets created in BOBJ when the user logs into Portal via Launchpad for the firs time.
Lets say we have 5 roles in BW that the user is part of, and when we import the 5 roles, we do not see the user as a member of the 5 roles in BOBJ. But the user is seen in only one role.
We do not see user in any other 4 roles imported from BW, even though the user is in those roles in BW. This causes a problem as the roles are applied to different folders in BOBJ and User now cant see the objects attached to the 4 roles that the user is part of.
We even tried scheduling a role and alias import from User Update tab in the SAP Authentication in CMC. That did not help either. I thought this should atelast synch up everything between BW and BOBJ.
Any thoughts on this please
Thank you
Suman

Similar Messages

  • Users are not removed from role using UME API

    Hello,
    I am using this code to remove users from a batch of roles that I have.
    Everything is running OK, no exception is thrown and at the System.out I see all the actions that needs to be taken correctly. The problem is that if I'll go later to one of the roles the users are still assigned to it. Any idea what I'm doing wrong here?
    try
    IRoleFactory roles = UMFactory.getRoleFactory();
    IUserFactory users = UMFactory.getUserFactory();
    IRoleSearchFilter filter = roles.getRoleSearchFilter();
    filter.setUniqueName("<My_filter>", ISearchAttribute.LIKE_OPERATOR, false);
    ISearchResult sresult = roles.searchRoles(filter);
    if ( sresult.getState() == ISearchResult.SEARCH_RESULT_OK )
         while(sresult.hasNext())
         String id = (String)sresult.next();
         IRole role = UMFactory.getRoleFactory().getMutableRole(id);
         Iterator i = role.getUserMembers(false);
         while (i.hasNext())
                         String uid = (String)i.next();
              IUser user = users.getUser(uid);
              role.removeUserMember(user.getUniqueName());
              System.out.println("Removed user: " + user.getUniqueName() + " from role: " + role.getDisplayName());
         role.save();
         role.commit();
    catch (Exception e)
         manager.reportException(new WDNonFatalException(e), false);

    Solved it!
    It needs the FQDN User ID...

  • Users Are Not Removed From Old Position Via Structural Auth

    Hello...
    Has anyone experienced an issue where someone move from one position into a new one, the old reporting manager can still see this person information via structural auth?  There's a general structural profile with the evaluation path o-s-p and function module RH_GET_ORG_ASSIGNMENT which is assigned to all accounts in the system.  This profile works as intended when Person A moves to a different position reporting to Manager B.  Manager B can view Person A information (time, personal, etc.); however, the system does not remove Person A from Manager A.  In addition, the RHPROFL0 is scheduled twice a day.
    Thanks for any insights or thoughts on this issue.

    Hmm...
    Which release and SP are you on?
    Also check the depth of the profile (just in case the employees were demoted...) and the period (although you mention that it should be current only).
    I have only been involved is custom implementations of "structural authorizations" because the standard is quite tricky and complex to find an error or inconsistency - so hopefully one of the other gurus who are more familiar with it can help as well.
    Cheers,
    Julius

  • Unicode symbols (cyrillic in my case) are not imported from Primavera

    I had P6 Professional 8.3 and Pertmaster 8.7 (SP5). When I try to import data both way: natively through Primavera database or Primavera XER - all non-Latin symbols are messed. There are only question marks instead of symbols.

    Hi,
    Indeed there are URL path length limitations.
    You might refer to this
    TechNet article (for SP2010 but it should still be applicable for SP2013) about the URL path length limitations.
    Hope this helps,
    Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, P-Seller |

  • Comments not imported from Data Dictionary of SQL Server. SDDM 3.3.0.747

    Hi,
    SDDM 3.3.0.747 32-bit on Windows 7 64-bit.
    Comments are not imported from Data Dictionary of SQL Server 2008. Connection through Microsoft JDBC Driver 4.0 for SQL Server or jTDS 1.2.7
    What I have tried? In SDDM DDL generation, Comments in DBRMS for SQL Server are generated with "EXEC sp_addextendedproperty 'MS_Description' , 'Test Comment' ..." so I added extended property named "MS_Description" into SQL Server database, both on table and column. None of them were imported from Data Dictionary into SSDM. I have tried both drivers stated above. Is it a bug or am I missing something?
    I've found similar question thread Re: Data dictionary import doesn't import column comments for SDDM 3.0.0.665, so I guess it is a bug when importing with JDBC drivers.
    MiGli
    Edited by: MiGli_1006342 on May 25, 2013 8:32 AM
    Edited by: MiGli_1006342 on May 25, 2013 9:02 AM

    Extended properties were not imported correctly from SQLServer databases at DM 3.3.0.747.
    Calls to sp_addextendedproperty and fn_listextendedproperty have been modified.
    I don't think it is a problem with JDBC drivers.
    A bug fix should be available in the next release of DM.

  • Users are not able to create POs from PRs having Production Order (F)

    Hi Gurus
    Users are not able to create POs from PRs having Production Order (F) as creation indicator.
    Whenever we are trying to convert the PR to PO we are getting the error message "Requisition has different doc. type NB and item cat. >&<" based on the below OSS# 938154 condition for the creation indicator type F.
    Would you please investigate and advise what OSS notes are required to be able to use item category L (subcontracting) on a PO for a requisition generated from a network activity via Procurement Type = "Preliminary requisition for WBS element".
    Thanks,
    Sada.

    Hi Ajay & Andra
    Whenever we are trying to convert the PR to PO we are getting the error message "Requisition has different doc. type NB and item cat. >&<" based on the below OSS# 938154 condition for the creation indicator type  Production order (F).
    Our Business requirement as shown below.
    1).The problem - we currently have no way to "direct requisition" an item to be procured via      subcontracting - only itu2019s possible via MRP.
    2).These behaviors are inconsistent as the requisition process should not impact the procurement process.  Can we find a way to influence the creation indicator on the requisition so that it does not appear as a production order?
    Please suggest any alternate method for achieving this.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sada

  • LAN was down ie Users are not getting ip from DHCP server after enabling DHCP snooping

    Hi All ,
    Enclosed file has network connectivity diagram.
    1. L3 vlan's ie 2,3,4,5 and 6 are configured on ACC-CR1 and ACC-CR2. 
    2.Trunk is configured between Core switches ( CR1 and CR2) and access switches .VTP mode is transparent on all switches.L2 vlans are configured on all access switches.
    3.DHCP is server is located at different location and is reachable over MPLS.
    Without enabling dhcp snooping , users connected to access switches (Sw1,sw2,sw3 and Sw4 ) are getting ip address from DHCP server without any problem and everything is working fine.
    But users connected to Sw3 and Sw4 are getting ip address from rouge DHCP server which is not pingable from any one of the switch.
    So we have configured DHCP snooping for all vlan's on CR1 , CR2 , SW3 and SW4 and "trusted uplink ports" which are connected to WAN routers from CR1 and CR2  and also "trusted uplink ports " of Sw3 and Sw4 which are connected to CR1 and CR2.
    As soon we have enabled DHCP snooping and trusted respective uplink ports , users are not getting ip address from remote DHCP server and even users connected to Sw1 and SW2 are facing same issue.
    Note : DHCP snooping is not configured on SW1 and SW2.
    Why users are not getting ip address from remote DHCP server as soon as we enabled dhcp snooping on Core switches and two access switches ie sw3 and sw4 ? what could have caused DHCP packets to be dropped ? Any idea would be appreciated .

    Hi,
    as you say: " HSRP is configured between CR1 and CR2 and Vlans are active on CR1" does it mean there are L3 intrefaces configured in each VLAN on your CR switches and ip hepler-address pointing to the remote DHCP server is configured on each of them?
    I know it's difficult in a productive environment but IMHO you need to find out where are the DHCP offers dropped.
    Either by enabling DHCP debugging or by capturing packets via Wireshark, e.g.
    Best regards,
    Milan

  • After upgrading to Yosemite (I don't have iPhoto anymore, only PHOTOS) my pictures will not import from my iPad or iPhone 5s or any picture from web, it shows "Database Error: failured to persist version"

    After upgrading to Yosemite (I don't have iPhoto anymore, only PHOTOS) my pictures will not import from my iPad or iPhone 5s or any picture from web, it shows "Database Error: failured to persist version".  Any help will be greatly appreciated.

    Sorry,
    Yes, the error message is exactly like that  ("Database error: failured to persist version")
    No photos will import at all.  I use USB to import from iPhone 5s or iPad 2. 
    About the difference?  iPhoto and Photos .  Are there two softwares?
    I also will like to merge and/or synchronize all my photos I had saved to iCloud backups, Macbook Pro,  iPhone 5s and iPad hard drives using iPhoto.  It's call iPhoto library.  At one point I turned off streaming. 
    Thanks again Larry HN.

  • T/F: iPhone users are not required to pay $15/month extra for Good Technology

    I have a personal Droid RAZR M.  You may wonder why I am posting in the iPhone forum but you are about to find out.
    I have access to corporate e-mail via Good Technology.  When I got this service set up at the same time I acquired the phone, I was required to upgrade from a $30/month 2GB plan to a $45/month 2GB plan just to have this access ("needed for access to company servers").  That was a surprise but I got over it.  However, since then, I have come to learn the following:
    1.  It appears that other than VZW, no other carriers are charging users extra for access to Good Technology.
    2.  Based on a colleague's information from a Good Technology support engineer and a office mate who is using a VZW iPhone, VZW iPhone users are *not* *required* to move to an Enterprise plan aren't paying an extra $15/month.  If one searches the Internet, I am not the only one asking about this.
    If you are using a Verizon Wireless iPhone and have Good Technology on your phone, would you let me know if were *required* to upgrade your data plan and pay extra just for using Good Technology?
    Thanks,
    Techvet

    I need to check some information at work about this, since they have some guidance on how their employees can connect to their corporate email with android and iphone devices.

  • PO Approval Items Workitems are not removed from the Universal Worklist UWL

    Hi,
    Certain of our purchase orders require approval, they are sent to the relevant approver via workflow to their SAP inbox (SBWP) and universal worklist.
    When the user executes the workitem (Approve or Reject) The workitem should be removed from the universal worklist and SBWP when refreshed.
    The problem we experiencing is that the Workitems are not removed from the UWL after they have been executed. The SBWP is behaving correctly and the items are removed.
    It is not all the workitems that have this problem, only certain ones - but there is no pattern.
    Thanks for the help.

    Hi,
    The user B approved the PR accessing the transaction SBWP or via PR transaction directly?
    If via PR transaction directly, then your workflow needs a Wait Event step.
    Regards,
    Kleber

  • Multibyte users are not able to authenticate using Default Authenticator

    Hi,
    We are facing an issue with multi-byte user authentication. All chinese and french users are not able to authenticate.
    When we try to authenticate with réseau/welcome1, where réseau is a user created in embedded LDAP, authentication fails.
    Security log generated is-
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <com.bea.common.security.internal.service.CallbackHandlerWrapper.handle got username from callbacks[0], UserName=rseau>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <LDAP Atn Login username: rseau>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <getConnection return conn:LDAPConnection { ldapVersion:2 bindDN:""}>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <authenticate user:rseau>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <getDNForUser search("ou=people,ou=myrealm,dc=base_domain", "(&(uid=rseau)(objectclass=person))", base DN & below)>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <getDNForUser search("ou=people,ou=myrealm,dc=base_domain", "(&(uid=rseau)(objectclass=person))", base DN & below)>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <returnConnection conn:LDAPConnection { ldapVersion:2 bindDN:""}>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <[Security:090302]Authentication Failed: User rseau denied>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <com.bea.common.security.internal.service.LoginModuleWrapper.commit>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <LDAP Atn Abort>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <com.bea.common.security.internal.service.LoginModuleWrapper.commit delegated, returning false>
    ####<06-Jan-2009 22:47:49 o'clock PST> <Debug> <SecurityAtn> <jjpeng-lab1> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1231310869374> <BEA-000000> <weblogic.security.service.internal.WLSJAASLoginServiceImpl$ServiceImpl.authenticate authenticate failed for user rseau>
    We are using WebLogic Server 10.3 Default Authenticator as Authentication Provider.
    I found few change requests related to multi-byte from the link: http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs103/issues/known_resolved.html
    Am I missing some configuration? Has anyone else tried authenticate multibyte username?
    Thanks,
    Anuj

    Can you provide more information on the use case?
    1. Is this using Basic or Form authentication?
    2. If the user logs on from a web-based client, do you get the same failure with Internet Explorer as with other browsers?
    3. On which operating system is the WebLogic AdminServer running?
    With WebLogic Server 10.3, I am able to authenticate with multi-byte (French and Japanese) usernames. (My environment: form auth, Firefox 3.0.5, WLS runs on Linux RHEL 4.0.)

  • Transfermations are not importing in prd

    Hi All,
    I  am transporting transfermations from DEV to QA and PRD.
    In QA it is working fine but in PRD 3 fields rules are not importing. these 3 fields are direct mapping rules.
    DSO level ---> only one rule is not imported.(ZBRANCH)
    Cube levlel---> 3 rules are not imported.(AB,BIs,ZBRANCH)
    Because of this r/3 data source strucure is changed.
    I found the imprted logs message is likethis.
    rule18,19,20,21 are not imported .
    Why it's changing r/3 data source.
    How can i resolve  this problem. Objects  all are in active only.

    Hi ,
    Check whether all source system mapping is done between the sender and target system properly
    check whether all the objects are in active version or not
    If any objects in the target system is inactive then go to SE 38 run the program RSDG_AFTER_IMPORT_FOR_CORR to make those objects in to active version
    Pls assign full points if answer is helpfull
    Regards ,
    Subash Balakrishnan

  • Depot Sales-Excise values are not flowing from J1iJ to VF01

    Hi Gurus,
    In Depot Sales: while doing excise invoive from T-code J1iJ Go to delivery -RG23D selection select the delivery number XXXXX Excise Group 51 and series Group: 50 ENTER - select the line item and click on F6 and here we have to click on excise invoice Button for capturing the Input excise duties for taking the reference. And the excise values are shown here correctly.
    Issue: In VF01- when we are raising the commercial invoice , the duty values are not flowing from the J1IJ transaction. Instead the values are showing Zero for all the three condition types namely JEXP, JECS and JHCS. We have used the Pricing Procedure ZINDEP and 356 routine.
    Inputs on this how to solve will be highly appreciated.. as we are in critical stage.
    What are the checks to be ensured to Get the values flow from J1IJ to VF01.
    Scenario: STO from Mfrg Plant to Depot and Depot sales to customer.
    Me21N-Me29N-VL10B-VL02N-VF01-J1IIn-MIGO-(STO process completes)-VA01-VL01N-J1IJ-VF01(duty values should flow from the J1IJ referenced Excise Invoice) Correct me if I am wrong.
    Any user exits, Notes please let me know. I could not find any. I have gone through the forum threads, which speaks about 356 routine, J1ID- checks etc.
    Thanks&Regards
    Sreekanth:

    Hi!
    Am sure you would have captured the Excise at Depot with J1IG.
    Also, have you saved the billing document to check the duties? 
    Thirdly, after save, again open the billing doc and go to Header-Conditions then Save. This part does not seems logical, but i am sharing my practical experience.
    Please check condition records if any.
    Regards
    Arun

  • Users are not able to use Outlook 2010 to view free/busy information and cannot set Out Of Office automatic reply

    Hi All,
    Please help me.
    I have an issue where users are not able to use Outlook 2010 to view free/busy information and cannot set Out Of Office automatic reply. But they are can set Out Of Office automatic reply from OWA. My exchange server is Ms Exchange 2010.
    The test E-mail AutoConfiguration failed with this error:
    Autodiscover to https://mydomain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml starting
    GetLastError=12175; httpStatus=0.
    Autodiscover to https://mydomain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml Failed (0x800C8203)
    Autodiscover to https://autodiscover.mydomain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml starting
    GetLastError=12007; httpStatus=0.
    Autodiscover to https://autodiscover.mydomain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml Failed (0x800C8203)
    Local autodiscover for mydomain.com starting
    Local autodiscover for mydomain.com Failed (0x8004010F)
    Redirect check to http://autodiscover.mydomain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml starting
    Srv Record lookup for http://autodiscover.mydomain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml Failed (0x80072EE7)
    Srv Record lookup for mydomain.com starting
    Srv Record lookup for mydomain.com Failed (0x8004010F)
    Any idea?
    Thanks,
    Pieter

    OK.
    Please follow this step.
    1. As you said you are in coexistence step , so for now all endpoint already point to Exchange 2010 right?
    2. Check legacy owa redirect that you already configure
    3. In Exchange 2010 , Make sure that you already configure "Autodiscoverinternaluri" by this command set-clientaccessserver -identity "servername" -autodiscoverinternaluri
    https://autodiscover.domain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml. and don't forget to create autodiscover record in DNS
    4. in Exchange 2010 , Make sure that you already configure "EWS" path by this command set-webservicesvertualdirectory -identity "XXX\Default web site name" -internalurl
    https://yourinternalurl/EWS/Exchange.asmx -externalurl https://yourexternalurl/EWS/Exchange.asmx
    5. don't forget to replicate freebusy from Exchange 2003 to Excahnge 2010 via public folder.
    You error look like client cannot get autodiscover process please check it again.

  • Requisition users are not belonging to any purchasing organization

    hi friends,
    im using oracle 11i. as per our organization policy, requisition users should be able to make Receipts (for expense items only, not any inventory items) i.e. they will do receiving transactions. they are already assigned with Receiving responsibility . but when anyone clicks on Receipt the Select Organization Window is not appearing which normally appears to inventory users. and as a result Requisition users are not being able to find any PO to make receiving transactions.
    requisition users are not belonging to any purchasing organization. pls help me how to make Select Organization Window available to those users.
    Thanks,
    LISAN

    Hi Lesan,
    You need to revisit "Receiving responsibility", check what are the menu and function excluded from the Responsibility and what is the main menu attached to this responsibility (e.g : Purchasing Receiver GUI)...
    the best practice will be in your Receiving Responsibility, *1) Attach Menu : Purchasing Receiver GUI 2) Remove all entries for menu exclusions.. Save it.. Assign this responsibility to yourself.. Now try to receive.. I am sure now system will prompt you for an organization :)*
    Please test and confirm..
    Regards,
    S.P DASH

Maybe you are looking for