Using bind variables (in & out) with dynamic sql

I got a table that holds pl/sql code snippets to do validations on a set of data. what the code basically does is receiving a ID and returning a number of errors found.
To execute the code I use dynamic sql with two bind variables.
When the codes consists of a simpel query, it works like a charm, for example with this code:
BEGIN
   SELECT COUNT (1)
   INTO :1
   FROM articles atl
   WHERE ATL.CSE_ID = :2 AND cgp_id IS NULL;
END;however when I get to some more complex validations that need to do calculations or execute multiple queries, I'm running into trouble.
I've boiled the problem down into this:
DECLARE
   counter   NUMBER;
   my_id     NUMBER := 61;
BEGIN
   EXECUTE IMMEDIATE ('
      declare
         some_var number;
      begin
      select 1 into some_var from dual
      where :2 = 61;
      :1 := :2;
      end;
      USING OUT counter, IN my_id;
   DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (counter || '-' || my_id);
END;this code doesn't really make any sense, but it's just to show you what the problem is. When I execute this code, I get the error
ORA-6537 OUT bind variable bound to an IN position
The error doesn't seem to make sense, :2 is the only IN bind variable, and it's only used in a where clause.
As soon as I remove that where clause , the code will work again (giving me 61-61, in case you liked to know).
Any idea whats going wrong? Am I just using the bind variables in a way you're not supposed to use them?
I'm using Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit

Correction. With execute immediate binding is by position, but binds do not need to be repeated. So my statement above is incorrect..
You need to bind it once only - but bind by position. And the bind must match how the bind variable is used.
If the bind variable never assigns a value in the code, bind as IN.
If the bind variable assigns a value in the code, bind as OUT.
If the bind variable assigns a value and is used a variable in any other statement in the code, bind as IN OUT.
E.g.
SQL> create or replace procedure FooProc is
  2          cnt     number;
  3          id      number := 61;
  4  begin
  5          execute immediate
  6  'declare
  7          n       number;
  8  begin
  9          select
10                  1 into n
11          from dual
12          where :var1 = 61;       --// var1 is used as IN
13 
14          :var2 := n * :var1;     --// var2 is used as OUT and var1 as IN
15          :var2 := -1 * :var2;    --// var2 is used as OUT and IN
16  end;
17  '
18          using
19                  in out id, in out cnt;  --// must reflect usage above
20 
21          DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ( 'cnt='||cnt || ' id=' || id);
22  end;
23  /
Procedure created.
SQL>
SQL> exec FooProc
cnt=-61 id=61
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>

Similar Messages

  • Using same bind variable multiple times in Dynamic sql

    Hi;
    I have a query which uses same variable multiple times, is there a way I could use only one time that variable and it will take multiple times.
    Query is;
    execute immediate 'SELECT count(*) FROM x WHERE MONTH_ID = :VOMNTH_ID
    UNION
    SELECT count(*) FROM Y WHERE MONTH_ID = :VOMNTH_ID
    union
    SELECT count(*) FROM z WHERE MONTH_ID = :VOMNTH_ID ' using month1,month1,month1
    What I want Just supply month1 only once.
    Your help is appreciated.
    VKM

    the way suggested by Nigel worksI'm not sure what you intend to use the resultset for but remember that UNION will remove duplicates from the result set and could possibly sort it too. Even if that were not the case (for example if you used UNION ALL) Oracle does not specifically guarantee the order of resultsets.
    If you are expecting the first row to contain the first count (and so on) then you might not get the answer you are expecting.
    Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    SQL> SELECT 3 n
      2  FROM   dual
      3  UNION
      4  SELECT 2 n
      5  FROM   dual
      6  UNION
      7  SELECT 1 n
      8  FROM   dual;
             N
             1
             2
             3
    SQL> SELECT 1 n
      2  FROM   dual
      3  UNION
      4  SELECT 2 n
      5  FROM   dual
      6  UNION
      7  SELECT 2 n
      8  FROM   dual;
             N
             1
             2
    SQL>

  • Using bind variables with sql statements

    We connect from a VB 6.0 program via OO4O to an Oracle 8.1.7 database, using bind variables in connection with select statements. Running ok, but performance again by using bind vars not as good as expected!
    When looking into the table v$sqlarea, we were able to detect the reason. We expected that our program submits the sql statement with bind vars, Oracle parses this once, and with each select statement again, we do not have a reparse. But: It seems that with each new session Oracle reparses the sql statement, that is, Oracle is not able to memorize or cache bind vars and statements. Even more worrying, this kind of behaviour was visible with each new dynaset, but the same database/session.
    Is there anybody our there with an idea of what is happening here?
    Code snippet:
    Dim OraSession As OracleInProcServer.OraSessionClass
    Dim OraDatabase As OracleInProcServer.OraDatabase
    Set OraSession = CreateObject("OracleInProcServer.XOraSession")
    Set OraDatabase = OraSession.OpenDatabase(my database", "my connect", 0&)
    OraDatabase.Parameters.Add "my_bind", 0, ORAPARM_INPUT
    OraDatabase.Parameters("my_bind").DynasetOption = ORADYN_NOCACHE
    OraDatabase.Parameters("my_bind").serverType = ORATYPE_NUMBER ' Bind Var Type
    Dim RS As OracleInProcServer.OraDynaset
    strSQLstatement= "Select * from my_table where igz= [my_bind] "
    Set RS = OraDatabase.CreateDynaset(strSQLstatement, &H4)
    OraDatabase.Parameters("my_bind").Value = myValue
    RS.Refresh
    Cheers and thanks a lot :)
    Michael Sonntag

    We connect from a VB 6.0 program via OO4O to an Oracle 8.1.7 database, using bind variables in connection with select statements. Running ok, but performance again by using bind vars not as good as expected!
    When looking into the table v$sqlarea, we were able to detect the reason. We expected that our program submits the sql statement with bind vars, Oracle parses this once, and with each select statement again, we do not have a reparse. But: It seems that with each new session Oracle reparses the sql statement, that is, Oracle is not able to memorize or cache bind vars and statements. Even more worrying, this kind of behaviour was visible with each new dynaset, but the same database/session.
    Is there anybody our there with an idea of what is happening here?
    Code snippet:
    Dim OraSession As OracleInProcServer.OraSessionClass
    Dim OraDatabase As OracleInProcServer.OraDatabase
    Set OraSession = CreateObject("OracleInProcServer.XOraSession")
    Set OraDatabase = OraSession.OpenDatabase(my database", "my connect", 0&)
    OraDatabase.Parameters.Add "my_bind", 0, ORAPARM_INPUT
    OraDatabase.Parameters("my_bind").DynasetOption = ORADYN_NOCACHE
    OraDatabase.Parameters("my_bind").serverType = ORATYPE_NUMBER ' Bind Var Type
    Dim RS As OracleInProcServer.OraDynaset
    strSQLstatement= "Select * from my_table where igz= [my_bind] "
    Set RS = OraDatabase.CreateDynaset(strSQLstatement, &H4)
    OraDatabase.Parameters("my_bind").Value = myValue
    RS.Refresh
    Cheers and thanks a lot :)
    Michael Sonntag

  • Using bind variable with IN clause

    My application runs a limited number of straight up queries (no stored procs) using ODP.NET. For the most part, I'm able to use bind variables to help with query caching, etc... but I'm at a loss as to how to use bind variables with IN clauses. Basically, I'm looking for something like this:
    int objectId = 123;
    string[] listOfValues = { "a", "b", "c"};
    OracleCommand command = new OracleCommand();
    command.Connection = conn;
    command.BindByName = true;
    command.CommandText = @"select blah from mytable where objectId = :objectId and somevalue in (:listOfValues)";
    command.Parameters.Add("objectId", objectId);
    command.Parameters.Add("listOfValues", listOfValues);
    I haven't had much luck yet using an array as a bind variable. Do I need to pass it in as a PL/SQL associative array? Cast the values to a TABLE?
    Thanks,
    Nick

    Nevermind, found this
    How to use OracleParameter whith the IN Operator of select statement
    which contained this, which is a brilliant solution
    http://oradim.blogspot.com/2007/12/dynamically-creating-variable-in-list.html

  • ORA-01722: invalid number caused with SQL using bind variable

    Hi,
    Im am hoping that someone can help me resolve a problem thats only just services and is being experienced on quite a few clients.
    our application uses C++ exes and makes OCI calls to the database.
    what has happened in the last week or so, there has been quite a few invalid number errors being received on a prod server but strangly enough we cannot reproduct the error on our UAT system.
    The sql is using bind variables and the information in the trace file shows that a number is being used for the bind variable, here is an extract from one trace file:
    for some schemas, the bind variable value is some currupted value, i think:
    oacdty=01 mxl=32(21) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
    oacflg=03 fl2=1206001 frm=01 csi=178 siz=32 off=0
    kxsbbbfp=9a8d62b8 bln=32 avl=03 flg=05
    value="Â*d"
    but on another schema, the value used is:
    Bind#0
    oacdty=01 mxl=32(32) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
    oacflg=03 fl2=1206001 frm=01 csi=178 siz=32 off=0
    kxsbbbfp=c5f92718 bln=32 avl=04 flg=05
    value="2101"
    however both produce invalid number errors.
    I am relatively inexperienced as a DBA so would appreciate as much help as i can get.

    Could you post your sql statement that is being run.
    Also post the query plan from your uat system and the one from your production system (They are likely to be different)
    You can export the stats from your production system and run them in your uat system. If you do this, then the execution plans should be the same on both systems(dbms_stats) and if you have the same data you should run into the same problem on uat as in production.
    The root cause of this type of problem is having a column in a table which holds values which are of different datatypes. Typically there is a condition in the where clause which indicates that for example only numeric columns should be retrieved from the column which holds multiple data types. However since the optimizer is free to rewrite the query any way it sees fit, (It does not necessarily execute in the order the sql statement is written) it does not filter this data first, and therefore you hit non-numeric data and run into the invalid number error.
    You can use little techniques like using an inline view with rownum in the column list, to perform the first filter. This ensures that the inline view is executed on its own, rather than being merged (materialized) with the rest of the query.
    A quick temporary solution is to use a comparison like to_char(column_name) = variable
    Make sure your comparisons are correct and it doesn't negatively impact on performance of the query

  • ORA-01006 Using Bind Variables In A Dynamic SQL Contains Query

    I have the following dynamic SQL query :-
    declare
    TYPE typ_sql IS REF CURSOR;
    ltyp_sql typ_sql;
    lv_sql VARCHAR2(100);
    begin
    lv_sql := 'SELECT arx_id FROM arx WHERE CONTAINS ';
    lv_sql := lv_sql || (arx_full,''(:b1) WITHIN ui'') > 0';
    open ltyp_sql FOR v_sql USING ln_id;
    fetch ......
    close ......
    end;
    When the code tries to open the cursor it gives the above error. I presume it is the way Oracle is expanding the bind variable but I cannot find anything in the docs to say why this is happening or whether you can do this or not using bind variables ( CONTAINS query ). Any help would be appreciated, thanks,
    Stuart.

    lv_sql || '(arx_full, :b1 || '' within ui'') > 0';

  • How to use bind variables with XMLTABLE?

    I tried to use bind variables with xmltable statment. Here, my testcase:
    create or replace function wsdltest return xmltype as
    l_dummy xmltype;
    l_stt clob;
    l_name varchar2(500);
    l_xml clob;
    BEGIN
    l_xml :=
    '<definitions name="F1" targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/orawsv/XFILES/F1" xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:tns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/orawsv/XFILES/F1" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/">
    <types>
    <xsd:schema targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/orawsv/XFILES/F1" elementFormDefault="qualified">
    <xsd:element name="SVARCHAR2-F1Input">
    <xsd:complexType>
    <xsd:sequence>
    <xsd:element name="A-VARCHAR2-IN" type="xsd:string"/>
    </xsd:sequence>
    </xsd:complexType>
    </xsd:element>
    <xsd:element name="F1Output">
    <xsd:complexType>
    <xsd:sequence>
    <xsd:element name="RETURN" type="xsd:string"/>
    </xsd:sequence>
    </xsd:complexType>
    </xsd:element>
    </xsd:schema>
    </types>
    <message name="F1InputMessage">
    <part name="parameters" element="tns:SVARCHAR2-F1Input"/>
    </message>
    <message name="F1OutputMessage">
    <part name="parameters" element="tns:F1Output"/>
    </message>
    <portType name="F1PortType">
    <operation name="F1">
    <input message="tns:F1InputMessage"/>
    <output message="tns:F1OutputMessage"/>
    </operation>
    </portType>
    <binding name="F1Binding" type="tns:F1PortType">
    <soap:binding style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
    <operation name="F1">
    <soap:operation soapAction="F1"/>
    <input>
    <soap:body parts="parameters" use="literal"/>
    </input>
    <output>
    <soap:body parts="parameters" use="literal"/>
    </output>
    </operation>
    </binding>
    <service name="F1Service">
    <documentation>Oracle Web Service</documentation>
    <port name="F1Port" binding="tns:F1Binding">
    <soap:address location="http://localhost:8080/orawsv/XFILES/F1"/>
    </port>
    </service>
    </definitions>';
    -- OK
    l_stt := 'select * from xmltable(XMLNAMESPACES(''http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema'' AS "XSD", default ''http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/''),
    ''//definitions/types/XSD:schema/XSD:element[@name="SVARCHAR2-F1Input"]''
    passing xmltype(:1)
    columns
    ab xmltype path ''.'' ) t';
    EXECUTE IMMEDIATE l_stt INTO l_dummy using l_xml;
    -- ERROR ORA-01006
    l_name := '"SVARCHAR2-F1Input"';
    l_stt := 'select * from xmltable(XMLNAMESPACES(''http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema'' AS "XSD", default ''http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/''),
    ''//definitions/types/XSD:schema/XSD:element[@name=:2]''
    passing xmltype(:1)
    columns
    ab xmltype path ''.'' ) t';
    EXECUTE IMMEDIATE l_stt INTO l_dummy using l_xml, l_name;
    return l_dummy;
    END;
    Any idea ?
    Thanks in advance
    Cyryl

    Why are you using dynamic SQL statements? Why not just use something like this instead in your PL/SQL. I also replaced the leading // in your Xpath with just / since you start from the root node.
    select *
      INTO l_dummy
      from xmltable(XMLNAMESPACES('http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema' AS "XSD", default 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/'),
                    '/definitions/types/XSD:schema/XSD:element'
                    passing xmltype(l_xml)
                    columns
                    ab xmltype path '.' ) t;Also, the above returns two rows, which I suspect is not what you want. Here is the pure SQL version for you to debug.
    select *
      from xmltable(XMLNAMESPACES('http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema' AS "XSD", default 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/'),
                   '/definitions/types/XSD:schema/XSD:element'
                   passing xmltype('<definitions name="F1" targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/orawsv/XFILES/F1" xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:tns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/orawsv/XFILES/F1" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/">
    <types>
    <xsd:schema targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/orawsv/XFILES/F1" elementFormDefault="qualified">
    <xsd:element name="SVARCHAR2-F1Input">
    <xsd:complexType>
    <xsd:sequence>
    <xsd:element name="A-VARCHAR2-IN" type="xsd:string"/>
    </xsd:sequence>
    </xsd:complexType>
    </xsd:element>
    <xsd:element name="F1Output">
    <xsd:complexType>
    <xsd:sequence>
    <xsd:element name="RETURN" type="xsd:string"/>
    </xsd:sequence>
    </xsd:complexType>
    </xsd:element>
    </xsd:schema>
    </types>
    <message name="F1InputMessage">
    <part name="parameters" element="tns:SVARCHAR2-F1Input"/>
    </message>
    <message name="F1OutputMessage">
    <part name="parameters" element="tns:F1Output"/>
    </message>
    <portType name="F1PortType">
    <operation name="F1">
    <input message="tns:F1InputMessage"/>
    <output message="tns:F1OutputMessage"/>
    </operation>
    </portType>
    <binding name="F1Binding" type="tns:F1PortType">
    <soap:binding style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
    <operation name="F1">
    <soap:operation soapAction="F1"/>
    <input>
    <soap:body parts="parameters" use="literal"/>
    </input>
    <output>
    <soap:body parts="parameters" use="literal"/>
    </output>
    </operation>
    </binding>
    <service name="F1Service">
    <documentation>Oracle Web Service</documentation>
    <port name="F1Port" binding="tns:F1Binding">
    <soap:address location="http://localhost:8080/orawsv/XFILES/F1"/>
    </port>
    </service>
    </definitions>'
                   columns
                   ab xmltype path '.' ) t

  • PL SQL using bind variables

    I am very much new to PL/SQL to pardon my neivte.
    I would like to have some PL/SQL code that uses
    bind variables for insert statements and than issue
    commit's after a specific number of inserts.
    For example.
    desc xxx.taba
    a number
    b varchar2(20)
    I want to do someting like this:
    declare
    l_start number default dbms_utility.get_time;
    create or replace procedure insert_xxx(commit in number)
    begin
    for i in 1 .. 1000
    loop
    :a:=i;
    :b:=dbms_random.string('P', 20);
    intert into xxx :a :b;
    if i/mod=(number passed into to proc)
    commit
    end loop;
    dbms_output.put_line
    (round((dbms_utility.get_time-l_start)/100, 2) ||
    ' Seconds...' );
    end;
    end;
    Can somebody help me out with the correct syntax
    as I know it's incorrect.

    A few remarks
    - procedures don't have hidden variables defined in the outside world, as procedures are black boxes, which communicate only with the outside world
    using the actual parameter list
    - procedures don't commit. The caller should always commit!!!
    - procedures don't commit every <n> records. A commit finalizes a logical unit of work, not a technical one.
    If I would have been your supervisor and you would have presented this code, I would have fired you on the spot.
    Committing inside a loop also increases the likelihood of ora-1555 errors.
    So: remove the current parameter
    a and b should be formal parameters of the procedure
    Inside the procedure it should read
    insert into xxx values (a, b)
    Sybrand Bakker
    Senior Oracle DBA

  • Correct Way to use Bind variables when using an MS SQL server backend

    Hey,
    I'm having some trouble figuring out how to use bind variables in a view when using an MS SQL server backend. For some reason when I'm using an ApplicationModule that has a MS SQL Server JDBC library loaded and I attempt to click OK when editing the following query:
    SELECT kit_status, component_id
    FROM numbered_inv
    WHERE trialname = :1
    I get an error stating that "SQL Query Error Message Incorrect Syntax near ':'". Is JDeveloper compatible with SQL server for bind variables because this query runs just fine if I replace the :1 with a say "Testing testing".
    Thanks in advance
    Edited by: NullCheck on Dec 15, 2010 2:06 PM

    Gotcha. I had tried %1% %0% ?0 and ?1 and various other permutations none of which worked. Got it working by setting the query to:
    SELECT kit_status, component_id
    FROM numbered_inv
    WHERE trialname = ?
    ORDER BY kit_status
    And then adding a bind variable with "Bind position" set to 0.
    Thanks again Shay!

  • Using Bind variables in SQL PLUS Report

    using Bind variables in SQL PLUS Report. This report gets the arguments from the application concurrent program. Now my need is to convert the start_date and end_date to bind Variables to improve the performance. I have commented the original code in 'prompt List of Unapproved Adjustments' and used my Bind Variable but it is giving an error
    error: Bind Variable "ENDING_DATE" not declared
    Report Date and Time:
    26-OCT-2010 15:44:13
    List of Unapproved Adjustments
    Bind Variable 'ENDING_DATE" not declared
    Please see below the code for the sql plus report:
    define p_org_id           = '&1'
    define p_fy_begin_date = '&2'
    define p_start_date = '&3'
    define p_end_date = '&4'
    define p_conversion = '&5'
    declare
    variable begin_date date;
    exec :begin_date := p_start_date;
    variable ending_date date;
    exec :ending_date := p_end_date;
    /* Begin
    :begin_date := to_date('&p_start_date','YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS');
    :ending_date := to_date('&p_end_date','YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS');
    End; */
    set newpage none
    set termout off
    set pagesize 55
    set linesize 180
    set heading on
    set feedback off
    set wrap off
    set space 1
    set heading on
    begin
    dbms_application_info.set_client_info('&p_org_id');
    end;
    prompt
    prompt Report Date and Time:
    prompt ----------------------
    select to_char(sysdate,'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
    from dual ;
    prompt
    prompt List of Unapproved Adjustments
    prompt -------------------------------
    select b.trx_number,
    a.adjustment_number,
    f.user_name created_by
    from apps.ar_adjustments a,
    apps.ra_customer_trx b,
    apps.fnd_user f
    where a.customer_trx_id = b.customer_trx_id
    and a.status <> 'A'
    and a.created_by = f.user_id
    and a.creation_date between :begin_date
    and :ending_date
    -- and a.creation_Date between to_date('&p_start_date','YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS')
    -- and to_date('&p_end_date','YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS')
    order by
    b.trx_number ;

    Hi
    Please go to customization part of the report and verify..You have set a default value out there ..And also verify your lov and look at the values ..If it is again giving you the problem ..pl delete the report and develop it again from the scratch it will be solved...
    vishnu
    null

  • How to obtain SQL that don't use bind variables

    Hi,
    I'm trying to identify the SQL that should benefit from using bind variables.
    First, I tried to obtain the common signature from all those sql calls, by using:
    select * from (
    select  force_matching_signature, count(1) from v$sql where force_matching_signature<>0 group by force_matching_signature order by 2 desc
    ) where rownum < 50;Then, I copied those values to clipboard and executed: select sql_text from v$sql where force_matching_signature=<<<copied_signature_value>>>;Now I want to make it automatically, and get just 1 occurrence of each SQL that is similar to others by using a query.
    I've tried this:
    select sql_text from
    select sql_text, force_matching_signature, row_number() over (partition by force_matching_signature order by sql_text desc)rn from v$sql where force_matching_signature <>0
    )where rn <2 and rownum < 10 order by force_matching_signature descBut this is not returning results by attending to the count(1) of the first query I used. How can I modify this so I get the results in order of 'importance'?
    Thanks

    And I said. First use order by, then use rownum. I didn't mention row_number. Also there should be no need to add any more columns.
    Did you try it? Why didn't it work?
    untested example
    select * from (
       select sql_text from (select sql_text, force_matching_signature, row_number() over (partition by force_matching_signature order by sql_text desc) rn from v$sql where force_matching_signature != 0)
       where rn = 1
       order by force_matching_signature desc /* add any ordering you like here */
    where rownum < 10  /* then filter on the first 10 results */If you want to order it in such a way that the statement that is found most times comes first then say so. However I do not see how to group in your case.
    maybe like this
    tested example
    select * from (
       select cnt, sql_text
       from (select sql_text, force_matching_signature, row_number() over (partition by force_matching_signature order by sql_text desc) rn , count(*) over (partition by force_matching_signature) cnt
             from v$sql
             where force_matching_signature != 0)
       where rn = 1
       order by cnt desc, force_matching_signature desc /* add any ordering you like here */
    where rownum < 10  /* then filter on the first 10 results */
    ;Edited by: Sven W. on Oct 11, 2012 2:49 PM
    Edited by: Sven W. on Oct 11, 2012 2:51 PM
    Edited by: Sven W. on Oct 11, 2012 2:56 PM -- added count column to the output

  • Using bind variables in additional pl/sql code

    How do you retrieve the a bind variable in the addition pl/sql
    code portion of the report wizard?
    I try something like
    declare
    v_test varchar2(40);
    begin
    select lastname into v_test from wvgsemp
    where username = :binduser;
    htp.bold('Report generated by:
    '||v_test);
    end;
    but it say PLS-00049: bad bind variable 'BINDUSER'
    However this is exactly the way I declared it in step one
    of the wizard?

    Hi,
    You cannot have bind variables in additional plsql code.
    Thanks,
    Sharmila

  • Query don't use the right index when using bind variables

    Hi people !
    I need some help because I have an issue with a query that don t use the right Indexes as it should
    First of all, I have mainly three tables :
    ORDER : Table that contains description for each Order (approximately 1 000 000 Records)
    ORDER_MVTS : Table that contains the tasks made (called movements) to set up each Orders
    with quantity of packages prepared for each product (approximately 10 000 000 Records)
    PRODUCT : Tables that contains the products (approximately 50 000 Records)
    When I launch the query with hard coded values, it brings back response very fast
    because it uses the right index (ORDER_DHR_VALID) which represent the date and hour of the order
    (with format 'DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'). The selectivity for this index is good.
    NB 1: I have to use the trick " >= Trunc(date) and < trunc(date) +1 " to filter on a simple date because
    the index contains hour and minutes (I know it wasn't probably a bright idea at conception time).
    NB 2: The index on ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE is'nt discriminating enough because there is'nt enough different products.
    It's the same for index on CUSTOMER_CODE and on MVT_TYPE so only the index on ORDER.DHR_VALID is good.
    Here is the correct explain plan when I execute the query with hard coded values :
    SELECT SUM(ORDER_MVTS.NB_PACKAGE)
    FROM ORDER_MVTS, PRODUCT, ORDER
    WHERE ORDER.DHR_VALID >= TRUNC(to_date('14/11/2008 10:04:56','DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'))
    AND ORDER.DHR_VALID < TRUNC(to_date('14/11/2008 10:04:56','DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS')) + 1
    AND ORDER_MVTS.MVT_TYPE = 'DELIVERY'
    AND PRODUCT.CODE = ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE
    AND ORDER_MVTS.ORDER_CODE = ORDER.CODE
    AND ORDER.CUSTOMER_CODE = 'ADIDAS'
    AND PRODUCT.CODE = 1234
    Rows Row Source Operation
    1 SORT AGGREGATE
    2 NESTED LOOPS
    4 NESTED LOOPS
    2 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 378548) --> PRODUCT_PK
    4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER
    777 INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 378119) --> ORDER_DHR_VALID
    2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER_MVTS
    30 INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 377784) --> ORDER_MVTS_ORDER_FK
    Now the problem is when the query is used in a Cursor with bind variables.
    It seems like Oracle don't use index on ORDER.DHR_VALID because he can't figure out that he have
    to actually filter on a short period of time (only one day).
    So Oracle uses the index on ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE which is'nt a bright idea (it takes 10 secondes instead of just one)
    Here is the bad explain plan :
    Rows Row Source Operation
    1 SORT AGGREGATE
    2 NESTED LOOPS
    722 NESTED LOOPS
    2 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 378548) --> PRODUCT_PK
    722 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER_MVTS
    1790 INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 377777) --> ORDER_MVTS_PRODUCT_FK
    2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER
    1442 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 378439) --> ORDER_PK
    Now I have found two solutions to this problem :
    1) using a Hint to force the use of index on ORDER.DHR_VALID (with /*+ INDEX(ORDER ORDER_DHR_VALID) */ )
    2) Using Dynamic SQL and keeping the date hard coded (but not the other values except mvt_type)
    For example :
    QUERY :=
    'SELECT SUM(ORDER_MVTS.NB_PACKAGE)
    FROM ORDER_MVTS, PRODUCT, ORDER
    WHERE ORDER.DHR_VALID >= TRUNC(TO_DATE('''||To_char(P_DTE_VAL,'DD/MM/YYYY')||''',''DD/MM/YYYY'')) '||
    AND ORDER.DHR_VALID < TRUNC(TO_DATE('''||To_char(P_DTE_VAL,'DD/MM/YYYY')||''',''DD/MM/YYYY'')) + 1 '||
    AND ORDER_MVTS.MVT_TYPE = 'DELIVERY'
    AND PRODUCT.CODE = ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE
    AND ORDER_MVTS.ORDER_CODE = ORDER.CODE
    AND ORDER.CUSTOMER_CODE = :CUSTOMER
    AND PRODUCT.CODE = :CODE ';
    These two solutions work but Number 1 is bad in theory because it uses a Hint
    and Number 2 may be difficult to code.
    So my question is : Does someone knows another solution to force the use of index ORDER_DHR_VALID that can be simple and reliable.
    Thank you very much for support
    Edited by: remaï on Apr 1, 2009 4:08 PM

    What version of oracle you have? CBO work is different in 9i and 10g.
    Usually cost based optimizer do not want to use index for >< condition with binding variables because optimizer can not use statistic to determine selectivity, and by default selectivity of <> operators is low.
    (As I remember '>' selectivity by default is 5%, you have two conditions > and <, therefore resulting selectivity will be 0.05*0.05=0.0025 as two independent events, but selectivity of other conditions
    ORDER_MVTS.MVT_TYPE = 'DELIVERY' or ORDER.CUSTOMER_CODE = 'ADIDAS' looks much better for CBO)
    The best solution I see is do not use binding variables. Actually your query looks as searching query, which executes not so often, therefore you will not have perfomance win along of skipping execution plan creation.
    Edited by: JustasVred on Apr 1, 2009 10:10 AM

  • Using Bind Variable in a procedure

    Hello all,
    Aim - I wanted to set the value of a bind variable in a procedure
    I was unsuccessful in doing so, pls help me (pls let me know if u need more info).
    I have pasted the commands I executed in a SQL
    SQL> VARIABLE x NUMBER;
    SQL> EXEC :x := 5;
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE p1
    2 IS
    3 BEGIN
    4 :x := 5;
    5 END;
    6 /
    Warning: Procedure created with compilation errors.
    SQL> show err
    Errors for PROCEDURE P1:
    LINE/COL ERROR
    4/5 PLS-00049: bad bind variable 'X'

    The reason why the 2nd attempt failed is that in PL/SQL declared code (unlike anonymous blocks) you need to use PL/SQL (host) variables as bind variables and not SQL*Plus (host) variables.
    To explain in more detail:
    SQL> VARIABLE x NUMBER;
    SQL> EXEC :x := 5;
    The EXEC creates and transmits the following PL/SQL anonymous block to Oracle:
    begin
      :x := 5;
    end;It also bind the SQL*Plus host variable (defined as X to the bind variable :x).
    All well. But not the procedure P1 will not work. Numerous reasons - including that when I call the P1 proc from Delphi, or Joe calls it from Java, or Jack calls it from ASP - we do not have that SQL*Plus host variable X defined. That does not exist in the context when we make our PL/SQL calls to P1.
    So how can you write P1 so that we all can use it - from any language?
    You provide an input parameter for P1. This allows all of us to bind our host variables to the P1 call. E.g.
    create or replace procedure P1( x IN OUT number ) is
    begin
      x := 5;
    end;Now when you call it from SQL*Plus, you would do the following:
    SQL> var x number
    SQL> exec P1( x=>:X )
    When I call it from Delphi, I will bind my Delphi (host) variable to the procedure call. Ditto for Joe and Jack.
    Note that PL/SQL itself can also use host and bind variables when talking to the SQL engine. E.g.
    create or replace procedure P2( nRows IN OUT number ) is
    begin
      select count(*) into nRows from all_objects;
    end;In this case, nRows in the SQL statement is a SQL bind variable. It is also the PL/SQL host variable. As you can see, this is very similar to what SQL*Plus did with its host variable.
    Bind variables (within PL/SQL) is explained in more detail in the Oracle® Database PL/SQL User's Guide and Reference guide.

  • Performance when using bind variables

    I'm trying to show myself that bind variables improve performance (I believe it, I just want to see it).
    I've created a simple table of 100,000 records each row a single column of type integer. I populate it with a number between 1 and 100,000
    Now, with a JAVA program I delete 2,000 of the records by performing a loop and using the loop counter in my where predicate.
    My first JAVA program runs without using bind variables as follows:
    loop
    stmt.executeUpdate("delete from nobind_test where id = " + i);
    end loop
    My second JAVA program uses bind variables as follows:
    pstmt = conn.prepareStatement("delete from bind_test where id = ?");
    loop
    pstmt.setString(1, String.valueof(i));
    rs = pstmt.executeQuery();
    end loop;
    Monitoring of v$SQL shows that program one doesn't use bind variables, and program two does use bind variables.
    The trouble is that the program that does not use bind variables runs faster than the bind variable program.
    Can anyone tell me why this would be? Is my test too simple?
    Thanks.

    [email protected] wrote:
    I'm trying to show myself that bind variables improve performance (I believe it, I just want to see it).
    I've created a simple table of 100,000 records each row a single column of type integer. I populate it with a number between 1 and 100,000
    Now, with a JAVA program I delete 2,000 of the records by performing a loop and using the loop counter in my where predicate.
    Monitoring of v$SQL shows that program one doesn't use bind variables, and program two does use bind variables.
    The trouble is that the program that does not use bind variables runs faster than the bind variable program.
    Can anyone tell me why this would be? Is my test too simple?
    The point is that you have to find out where your test is spending most of the time.
    If you've just populated a table with 100,000 records and then start to delete randomly 2,000 of them, the database has to perform a full table scan for each of the records to be deleted.
    So probably most of the time is spent scanning the table over and over again, although most of blocks might already be in your database buffer cache.
    The difference between the hard parse and the soft parse of such a simple statement might be negligible compared to effort it takes to fulfill each delete execution.
    You might want to change the setup of your test: Add a primary key constraint to your test table and delete the rows using this primary key as predicate. Then the time it takes to locate the row to delete should be negligible compared to the hard parse / soft parse difference.
    You probably need to increase your iteration count because deleting 2,000 records this way probably takes too short and introduces measuring issues. Try to delete more rows, then you should be able to spot a significant and constant difference between the two approaches.
    In order to prevent any performance issues from a potentially degenerated index due to numerous DML activities, you could also just change your test case to query for a particular column of the row corresponding to your predicate rather than deleting it.
    Regards,
    Randolf
    Oracle related stuff blog:
    http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
    SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
    http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I change a column to lower case?

    I selected an entire column and discovered that it's already set at Format > Font > Capitalization > None If I change "None" to "All Caps," it capitalizes everything. But when I change it back to "None," letters that were originally capitalized remai

  • Variable within Filter expression will not parse -Seems to be corrupted

    ODI 10.3.4.0 I defined a Variable TTE_BU of type "Alphanumeric", Default Value = the select query:in (SELECT BUSINESS_UNIT FROM PS_S1_ODI_LEARNING) I use this variable as a package variable to filter table source data When I run the package The packa

  • Why is my FCP export blurry/pixelated?

    I'm using FCP 4.5 (upgrade next year!) and complete newbie to FCP/video post. I've captured video from a Sony PD150 using "DV PAL 48KHz". Now when I play back the video is horribly blurry and pixelated. When playing, but when paused it's nice and sha

  • When will firefox android have silverlight 5.0 support or plug-in?

    firefox silverlight plug-in

  • Install Oracle 11g client on Windows 7

    Hi, I am getting an error while installing Oracle 11g R1 client(11.1.0.7.0) on Windows 7 x32. Error: OUI-18001: The operating system 'Windows Vista Version 6.1' is not supported. Recommendation : install the recommended service pack.