Using Event Structures with Array of Clusters

Using LabVIEW 8.5
Hi all,
I'm trying to convert an existing application to one that can be used
through a touch screen. I updated the UI and added an event structure
to listen for mouse ups on controls that require a HMI keyboard or
numpad to show up. Although I've been programming for a while, I'm new
to LabVIEW and am struggling with a problem:
Is there any way to have an event case listen to an event within
arrays? I've seen a few examples on the forums, but they all start with
breaking up the arrays into individual variables. Using the variables,
they build arrays. This seems pretty tedious, and I'm pretty sure I
can't apply it to one of my arrays. Essentially, I just want to know
which cluster in which array the user has clicked on, so I can open the
HMI keyboard or numpad and send the text to that cluster. In my watered down app (Array of Clusters.vi), I've put 3 arrays of clusters and a few stand-alone controls to give you guys an idea of what I'm taking about.
BTW, I'm using the HMI Keyboard and Numpad built by the Beta Community (http://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-1062) and modified it to add a "Clear" button to the keyboard and numpad. Please let me know if I implemented this in the best way.
Thanks for the help,
Kunal
Message Edited by bhatiak on 08-04-2008 03:55 PM
Attachments:
Array of Clusters4.llb ‏274 KB

My old tic tac toe example shows how to determine which square of a 2D array has been clicked.
http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&view=by_date_ascending&message.id=247044#M247044
You probably can adapt some of it for the arrays on the right. If the array can be scrolled, you also need to account for the "indexvals" offset.
The Layers controls is easiest, because you only show one element. Just read the "index vals" property to get the array element and parse the coordinates to get the cluster element.
btw: the small while loop on the right serves no purpose at all and acts just as a CPU burner. You can delete it without any change in functionality. Is there anything else to it?
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

Similar Messages

Sort values of structure with arrays

Hi
For a shopping cart I'm using a structure with arrays to store the items in the cart. I tried to use StructSort but did not work...
This is how I store the items in the cart:
<cfscript>
            if (not(isdefined("session.cart"))) {                // Check to make sure that the Shopping cart structure exists.
                session.cart = structnew();
            // The item structure we are going to use to store the items in the cart
            // is going to have four parts...
            //         1. The item id
            //         2. The item name
            //         3. The price per unit
            //         4. The quantity
            tempvalue = listtoarray('#attributes.id#,#attributes.name#,#attributes.price#,#attributes.quantity#') ;
            // if the item is not yet in the cart, simply add it to the cart
            if (not(structKeyExists(session.cart, attributes.name))) {
                StructInsert(session.cart,attributes.name,tempvalue);
            // if the item is already in the cart, update the item quantity
            else {
                tempvalue[4]=session.cart[attributes.name][4]+attributes.quantity;
                StructUpdate(session.cart,attributes.name,tempvalue);
</cfscript>
Any help will be appreciated.
Thank you.
TJ

To loop over an array one has two options:
<cfloop index="i" from="1" to="#arrayLen(a)#">
Or:
<cfloop index="someVar" array="#a#">
Personally I use the former because I think the implementation of array-looping with <cfloop> is cocked-up as it's not the index that gets put into "someVar", it's the array element itself. So by way of pedantic protest, I don't use that syntax.
But anyway...
The reason why your struct is unordered is because structs are - innately, and by definition - unordered. If you want an ordered data structure, you use an array.
However what you are wanting to do is to sort your array by a subkey value of the structs the array contains. If you want to do that, you will need to roll your own sorting solution.
Personally I'd stick with using an array and just use its intrinsic ordering (the order in which items are added to it). However if you wanted to sort on one of the inner struct keys, you could maintain a separate struct keyed on the value you wish to sort on, containing a reference to the array element in the original array. Then you could extract a structKeyArray() from that, and use arraySort() to order those index keys in whichever order you like.
Adam

Can I use Event structures in a subVI?

Hi,
I have a subVI (ProvaEv1.vi) that use an event structure inside. But when I use it in a VI (ProvaVI.vi) the event structure in the subVI doesn't catch the events.
I tried to insert the event structure in a while loop but it doesn't work too.
Could you help me?
Thanks Ius
Attachments:
ProvaVI.vi ‏11 KB
ProvaEv1.vi ‏15 KB

"iusn" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
Thanks to all for your answers!
Wiebe! I tried to do as you suggested but I am not able to link the Event Reference Number inside te SubVI with the Event Register Number of the Register for Event in Main VI. There is e class conflict. Another question: how the SubVI can know the structure of the Register event outside?My aim was to create a modular structure but it seems very difficult, wath do you think about these problems?
The broken wire is related to your question. The event structure inside the sub vi knows about the events you register in the main, because the reference wire/control has a "strong" type. It contains information about the registered events. That is also why the wire is broken. You have to register all events, then create an indicator/control of the output. Use that control in the subvi. You have to do this every time the events change (you might use a type def if you use the control a lot).
Usually, the events that you would want to put inside subvi's are those related to user interface objects. I've had this a lot. You make a nice interface, but it's not reuseable, because the events are mixed with all the other events. Only solotion is to manually add the needed event cases in your program, and copy the code.
Even if you can put the events in a sub vi, I'd expect hanging vi's when more subvi's are registered for the same event. It's hard to tell without trying. So it's not a real solution either.
Like Chrisger suggested, the event callback might help a little, but they are tricky, and actually ment for this (they are intended for activex callbacks).
Perhaps you should look at XControls (if you use 8.2). It would be more work to replace your code to XControls, but once you're done, you have reusable code.. Haven't worked with them jet, but they are invented for this problem...
Regards,
Wiebe.
I have already create my application using event structure just in Main VI but it seems very complicate to read and keep update, I would have wanted to give modularity to my application.
Thanks Ius
SubVIEventMain.vi:
http://forums.ni.com/attachments/ni/170/203225/1/SubVIEventMain.vi
SubVIEvent.vi:
http://forums.ni.com/attachments/ni/170/203225/2/SubVIEvent.vi

Is it better to have one Event Structure with more (10 or 15) cases or several with fewer?

I have several buttons and events on the GUI of my app to monitor. Would it be better to use one Event Structure with several cases (10 or 15) or have a couple and split the cases evenly? None of the cases have much processing to handle, so there is not a time lag issue. I am just worried about overloading the structure. One of the tech support guys mentioned that the event structures are not that hard to get confused.
Has anyone had any problems with Event Structures?

I use event structures very often in my code. I use them just to handle the interface and to run small code. I have had event structures that handled over 50 user interface events and never had a problem. In my personal opinion If there was any code to run I would let the event structure handle the the user interface event that fired a que in another while loop that handled the code.You can find examples on this, if not I will send you one. It is just good programming practice for beginners because it will alow you to build more robust VI's in the future.
Hope this helps
Joe
Joe.
"NOTHING IS EVER EASY"

Event Structure with Event source: This VI and Event: Mouse Up

I downloaded an old example from 2008 on this forum and would like to duplicate it. It uses an event structure with an event case of just Mouse Up. Under Event Specifiers: the Event Source is <This VI> and Event: Mouse Up. This works like I want in LV 2009.
In LV 2009 if I choose for Event Source <This VI> under Events Mouse Up is not an option! I tried Event Source: Pane, and then Event Mouse Up is an option, but this does not trigger the event if you drag the mouse off the pane before you lift the mouse button.
I can copy the Event Structure over to my VI and rewire every case but that does not seem to be a good solution cuz I want this in several VIs.
I have attached the original VI with the Event Specifier I want. How do I get this Event Specifier in LV 2009?
Attachments:
Slider event control.vi ‏19 KB

phillman wrote:
I downloaded an old example from 2008 on this forum and would like to duplicate it. It uses an event structure with an event case of just Mouse Up. Under Event Specifiers: the Event Source is <This VI> and Event: Mouse Up. This works like I want in LV 2009.
In LV 2009 if I choose for Event Source <This VI> under Events Mouse Up is not an option! I tried Event Source: Pane, and then Event Mouse Up is an option, but this does not trigger the event if you drag the mouse off the pane before you lift the mouse button.
So what you can do is monitor the 'Mouse Leave' event for th pane, and then start polling the mouse state.
Technically it is correct that there is no Mouse Up event detected since the Mouse Up is not happening on th epane.
Ton
Free Code Capture Tool! Version 2.1.3 with comments, web-upload, back-save and snippets!
Nederlandse LabVIEW user groep www.lvug.nl
My LabVIEW Ideas
LabVIEW, programming like it should be!

Event structure with sub-VI

hi,
I designed a event-driven state machine UI that uses pop-up sub-VI for user date configuration and COM port config. Calling the sub-VIs works fine, but by closing them and sending back the modified data to the main state machine, the event handling routine stalls. With highlighting, I could verify that after returning from the sub-VI, the timeout event is being carried out as the only one (used because there is some background code to be processed repeatedly).
There are more buttons on the front panel then handled events in a certain state (the other buttons are used in other states), but the unused buttons are neither disabled nor hidden. Could that cause the problem? Or does the OK button of the closing sub-VI (or the changing data out of it) affect the main state machine event handler?
Thanks for your reply
Pac

Hi, Pac. Looking at your original VI, I would make a couple of general comments:
1) I don't suggest using an event structure in a timed loop. The timed loop is to ensure determinism in the code that is running. This doesn't really fit well with handling user interaction. As suggested in other posts, I would have a separate loop that is watching for user interaction with an event structure.
2) Having different event structures in each frame of a case structure is asking for trouble. The link Jarrod posted should be very helpful, but it is just a subset of the thorough documentation on using event structures (note: I may be a bit biased as I am one of the authors of the documentation . I would browse this whole chapter (http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361A-01/TOC20.htm) and pay specific attention to the "Caveats and Recommendations" section which should help save you a lot of frustration.
J
Jason King
LabVIEW R&D
National Instruments

How to control the tab control using event structure?

Hi,
I am using tab control and event structure in the program.
When i run the application event is not happening for the active page.
When user switches from active page to the other page then event is taking place for all pages
So, how to get the event trigger for the active page when the application is started
For more clarification i am attaching the code "Test Control Tab using Event Structure.vi"
Attachments:
Test Control Tab using Event Structure.vi ‏52 KB

You have a basic misunderstanding of dataflow. Maybe you should start with some tutorials or study some of the examples that ship with LabVIEW.
The event structure belongs inside the while loop, and not vice versa. RIght now, the event structure only runs exactly once and never again.
If the stop is pressed first, the VI will stop. Game over.
If the tab control is changed (from any state to any other state!), the inner loop will spin forever as fast as the CPU allows, either executing one or the other case. It just reads the tab terminal to decide which case to execute. Changing tab never triggers any events. The VI is trapped inside the event until stop is pressed to stop the VI.
you were closer to a reasonable program in the other thread:
http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&view=by_date_ascending&message.id=287905
Have you tried execution highlighting? Maybe things would become more clear of you do.
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

How to run the two events at the same time by using event structure

In my project, I have to run two stepper motor which can run both forward and reverse direction by changing the control in front panel so I am using event structure. In front panel I gave two separate controls for both stepper motor such as forward,reverse and stop. I would like to do motor1 will rotate alone, motor2 will rotate alone and both motor will rotate at the same time when user click the control in front panel. My doubt is how to run a motor2 while motor1 is running at the same time please tell me the suggestion for this problem
Attachments:
motor.png ‏192 KB

How do you control your motors?
Most motion control systems do supply two modes:
a) position based motion: The motion axis has a positioning system (most often some kind of encoder system) which enables the motion control to know where the axis is currently located. Passing the target location to the controller will result in the axis to move to that location. This is, for most applications, the recommended approach. It does require some sort of motion controller device.
b) direction based motion: This essentially tells the periphery device for the motor to move at a certain speed into a certain direction. As it does not stop at a dedicated location, it induces great risks for many applications if there are no kill- and/or end-switches. Depending on the setup, this can be either done with motion controllers or pure by software control (e.g. "controlling" the voltage level for the motor).
If you go for a), there is not much preventing parallelism as you request.
Option b) depends on the setup. If you have a control loop in the software itself, you have to move to an architecture like the producer/consumer. Please note that this does not incorporate any security measures for the external devices.
hope this helps,
Norbert
CEO: What exactly is stopping us from doing this?
Expert: Geometry
Marketing Manager: Just ignore it.

Can I have multiple event structures with the same event cases?

Hello,
I'm doing an application that reproduces the front panel of the HP6675A power supply. To achieve this, I have done a state machine with different states
(initialize, measures, voltage, current, ocp, ov, store, recall, etc). In each state, should have an event structure that catches the events of the buttons, like for example: if the current state is the Voltage mode and the user press the current button the next state will be the Current mode. For this in each state of the state machine should be the same event structure with the same events.
My problem is that the Vi doesn't work properly when I have multiple event structures with the same event cases. There are some possibily to do this, and how? Or is impossible to have multiple events? I have been reading some posts, but I don't find solutions.
Any help is appreciated.
Thank you very much.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

natasftw wrote:
Or as others mentioned, make two parallel loops. In one loop, have your state machine. In the other, have just the Event Handler. Pass the events from the handler to the state machine by way of queues.
A proper state machine will not need the second loop. The "Wait For Event" or "Idle" state (whatever you want to call it) is all you really need in order to catch the user button presses. The setup is almost there. Maybe add a shift register to keep track of which state to go to in the case of a timeout on the Event Structure.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

Problems using event structure to write new parameter values to VISA

Attachments:
FMA_event_2.vi ‏28 KB
FMA_event_2.vi ‏28 KB

It seems I'm also having trouble using forums..not sure what happened...updated and corrected thread: http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Problems-using-event-structure-to-write-new-parameter-values-to/td-p...

How to use event structure of event data nodes event filter nodes in programming

hi,
I need manual of how to use 'event structure' events of 'event data nodes' and 'event data filters'...please help me....
Regards
Ravindranath

I'm not really sure what you are looking for here. Did you do a search in the LabVIEW help for Event Structure?
The Event Data Node just returns information about the event, like control data, control reference, what caused the event, etc.
The Event Data Filters are just used in Filter Events. This allows you to discard an event or change the data that the event will recieve.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

Exit from the application using event structures

Hi
In my project i used event structure it working fine.
Now i want to exit(close) the application when i press EXIT button on the front panel.
Here i attached my project give an idea.
Regards
hari
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
Sledge.zip ‏40 KB

Hi SAM
U saw my ok.i have one more problem when i run the program(main vi) all the remain sub vi's also opened.
i want open sub vi when i press a button on front panel.
i have made small changes to it.
Regards
hari
Attachments:
Sledge.zip ‏41 KB

Stop graph using event structure

How could I stop the wavform chart during running the loop using event structure?

duplicate post
Best regards,
GerdW
CLAD, using 2009SP1 + LV2011SP1 + LV2014SP1 on WinXP+Win7+cRIO
Kudos are welcome

How to use a event structure with a state machine

First, I would like to inform you that I only work on LabView part time, and have much to learn. Anything I do learn, I usually forget until I need it again, because I only work on it part time.
Using your StopWhileLoopMOD[1].vi, I am trying to put a state machine inside the event structure.
Related link: http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/How-to-stop-while-loop-in-Event-case/td-p/465564/page/2
Here is my application: on the front panel, the user can select any combination of 7 different tests. I have created cases to perform each step of each test in the correct order, but if the user presses stop, the tests won't stop because some of the cases have a while loop inside the event structure (like you mentioned is a bad idea). The user should be able to stop the test, reselect tests to perform, and re-start the tests.
When the start button is pressed for the event structure, I need all the cases to run in the proper order, unless stop is pressed.
In the past I have indexed an array and used that to run the state machine, but it won't stop immediately.
I have sub VIs that are built in while loops because the outputs of the product needs time to stabilize.  The state machine stops and waits up to a certain number of iterations. If it passes the test, the while loop stops and the next state starts. If it takes too long, it exits and reports an error. Maybe I need to just use the state machine and not an event structure?
Is there a good example of an event structure?
metzler CLAD
Solved!
Go to Solution.

I'm not sure exactly what you are asking, but it sounds like you want to script a bunch of tests and if the user says stop, to immediately stop the current test and abandon the others? I'm going to assume that you know how to clear the array so that it will abandon the others, so I'm guessing that you are having trouble abandoning the current test? If this is indeed the case, then the problem is that you are not able to propagate the message from the main VI FP which is the GUI to the sub vi which is the test, where the test may or may not have a GUI (FP visible) of it's own. Threading was the first thing to come to mind, but this may not be necessary using events.
You can do this by passing a refnum of the stop button to the subVI, where you can then add that wait to the event case structure.
I've attached 2 VIs, mainvi.vi which is just a loop displays the count*2 (number of seconds passed since running) that will call subvi.vi and then check to see if the stop button is pressed. mainvi.vi is by no means a state engine, it is just a simple loop for demonstration purposes. subvi.vi just waits 2 seconds and leaves, it is a better structured state engine with an init state to start a poll case to wait for events and an exit state to clean up. You can modify this any way you wish to get it to do what you want. You will note that even if subvi.vi is being executed, it will terminate immediately when the stop button is pressed.
Hope this helps.
A
Attachments:
mainvi.vi ‏17 KB
subvi.vi ‏33 KB

Call library function node with array of clusters using array data pointer

Hello all.
I am writing a LabVIEW wrapper for an existing DLL function.
The function has, as one of its parameters, an array of structs. The struct is very simple, containing two integers. I am using the call library function node to access it.
In Labview I created an array of clusters, where the cluster has two 32-bit integers as its members. So far, so good.
Now I have to pass this in to the Call Library Function Node. Here I am running into trouble.
I have used The topic in LAVA and The topic in the knowledge base as my primary sources of information, though I have read a bunch of forum topics on the subject too.
I do understand that I could write a new function which takes as a parameter a struct with the size as the first member and an array as the second, and I might just do this and have it call the regular function, but I was hoping to do it more simply.
According to the C file which LabVIEW generates for me from the CLFN when I choose "Adapt to Type" and "Array Data Pointer", the prototype it is expecting is:
int32_t myFunc(uint32_t handle, uint16_t channel,
int32_t FIFOnumber, void data[], int32_t numWords, int32_t *actualLoaded,
int32_t *actualStartIndex);
And the prototype of the function in my DLL is
int borland_dll myFunc(DWORD handle, usint channel,
int FIFOnumber, struct mStruct *data, int numWords, int *actualLoaded, int *actualStartIndex);
This looks like a match to me, but it doesn't work (I get garbage in data). From the topic in LAVA referenced above, I understood that it would work. It does not.
If I cast data to the pointer-to-pointer I get when I generate c code by wiring my struct to a CIN and generating, then I seem to get what I expect. But this seems to work when I choose "pointers to handles" too, and I would expect array data pointer to give a different result.
Is there any way to get this to work directly, or will I have to create a wrapper? (I am currently using LabVIEW 2011, but we have customers using 2009 and 2012, if not other versions as well).
Thank you.
Batya
Solved!
Go to Solution.

OK, here is more detailed information.
I have attached the VI.
This is the code from the "C" file created by right-clicking the CLN and creating a "C" file.
When the parameter in the CLN is set to "array data pointer":
/* Call Library source file */
#include "extcode.h"
int32_t Load_Transmit_FIFO_RTx(uint32_t handle, uint16_t channel,
int32_t FIFOnumber, void data[], int32_t numWords, int32_t *actualLoaded,
int32_t *actualStartIndex);
int32_t Load_Transmit_FIFO_RTx(uint32_t handle, uint16_t channel,
int32_t FIFOnumber, void data[], int32_t numWords, int32_t *actualLoaded,
int32_t *actualStartIndex)
/* Insert code here */
When the parameter is "pointers to handles":
/* Call Library source file */
#include "extcode.h"
/* lv_prolog.h and lv_epilog.h set up the correct alignment for LabVIEW data. */
#include "lv_prolog.h"
/* Typedefs */
typedef struct {
int32_t control;
int32_t data;
} TD2;
typedef struct {
int32_t dimSize;
TD2 data[1];
} TD1;
typedef TD1 **TD1Hdl;
#include "lv_epilog.h"
int32_t Load_Transmit_FIFO_RTx(uint32_t handle, uint16_t channel,
int32_t FIFOnumber, TD1Hdl *data, int32_t numWords, int32_t *actualLoaded,
int32_t *actualStartIndex);
int32_t Load_Transmit_FIFO_RTx(uint32_t handle, uint16_t channel,
int32_t FIFOnumber, TD1Hdl *data, int32_t numWords, int32_t *actualLoaded,
int32_t *actualStartIndex)
/* Insert code here */
When the parameter is set to "handles by value":
/* Call Library source file */
#include "extcode.h"
/* lv_prolog.h and lv_epilog.h set up the correct alignment for LabVIEW data. */
#include "lv_prolog.h"
/* Typedefs */
typedef struct {
int32_t control;
int32_t data;
} TD2;
typedef struct {
int32_t dimSize;
TD2 data[1];
} TD1;
typedef TD1 **TD1Hdl;
#include "lv_epilog.h"
int32_t Load_Transmit_FIFO_RTx(uint32_t handle, uint16_t channel,
int32_t FIFOnumber, TD1Hdl *data, int32_t numWords, int32_t *actualLoaded,
int32_t *actualStartIndex);
int32_t Load_Transmit_FIFO_RTx(uint32_t handle, uint16_t channel,
int32_t FIFOnumber, TD1Hdl *data, int32_t numWords, int32_t *actualLoaded,
int32_t *actualStartIndex)
/* Insert code here */
As to the DLL function, it is a bit more complicated than I explained above, in the current case. My VI calls the function by this name in one DLL, and that DLL loads a DLL and calls a function (with the same name) in the second DLL, which does the work. (Thanks Rolfk, for helping me with that one some time back!)
Here is the code in the first ("dispatcher") DLL:
int borland_dll Load_Transmit_FIFO_RTx(DWORD handle, usint channel, int FIFOnumber, struct FIFO_DATA_CONTROL *data, int numWords, int *actualLoaded, int *actualStartIndex)
t_DispatchTable *pDispatchTable = (t_DispatchTable *) handle;
int retStat = 0;
retStat = mCheckDispatchTable(pDispatchTable);
if (retStat < 0)
return retStat;
if (pDispatchTable->pLoad_Transmit_FIFO_RTx == NULL)
return edispatchercantfindfunction;
return pDispatchTable->pLoad_Transmit_FIFO_RTx(pDispatchTable->handlertx, channel, FIFOnumber, data, numWords, actualLoaded, actualStartIndex);
borland_dll is just "__declspec(dllexport)"
The current code in the DLL that does the work is:
// TEMP
typedef struct {
int control;
int data;
} TD2;
typedef struct {
int dimSize;
TD2 data[1];
} TD1;
typedef TD1 **TD1Hdl;
// END TEMP
int borland_dll Load_Transmit_FIFO_RTx(int handlertx, usint channel, int FIFOnumber, struct FIFO_DATA_CONTROL *data, int numWords, int *actualLoaded, int *actualStartIndex){
struct TRANSMIT_FIFO *ptxFIFO; //pointer to transmit FIFO structure
usint *pFIFOlist; //pointer to array of FIFO pointers to FIFO structures
int FIFOentry, numLoaded;
usint *lclData;
usint nextEntryToTransmit;
// TEMP
FILE *pFile;
int i;
TD1** ppTD = (TD1**) data;
TD1 *pTD = *ppTD;
pFile = fopen("LoadFIFOLog.txt", "w");
fprintf(pFile, "Starting Load FIFO with %d data words, data pointer 0x%x, with the following data&colon; \n", numWords, data);
for (i = 0; i < numWords; i++) {
fprintf(pFile, "%d: control--0x%x, data--0x%x \n", i, data[i].control, data[i].data);
fflush(pFile);
fprintf(pFile, "OK, using CIN generated structures: dimSize %d, with the following data&colon; \n", pTD->dimSize);
for (i = 0; i < numWords; i++) {
fprintf(pFile, "%d: control--0x%x, data--0x%x \n", i, pTD->data[i].control, pTD->data[i].data);
fflush(pFile);
// END TEMP
if ((handlertx) <0 || (handlertx >= NUMCARDS)) return ebadhandle;
if (cardrtx[handlertx].allocated != 1) return ebadhandle;
pFIFOlist = (usint *) (cardrtx[handlertx].segaddr + cardrtx[handlertx].glob->dpchn[channel].tr_stk_ptr);
pFIFOlist += FIFOnumber;
ptxFIFO = (struct TRANSMIT_FIFO *)(cardrtx[handlertx].segaddr + *pFIFOlist);
//use local copy of ptxFIFO->nextEntryToTransmit to simplify algorithm
nextEntryToTransmit = ptxFIFO->nextEntryToTransmit;
//on entering this routine nextEntryToLoad is set to the entry following the last entry loaded
//this is what we need to load now unless it's at the end of the FIFO in which case we need to wrap around
if ( ptxFIFO->nextEntryToLoad >= ptxFIFO->numEntries)
*actualStartIndex = 0;
else
*actualStartIndex = ptxFIFO->nextEntryToLoad;
//if nextEntryToLoad points to the last entry in the FIFO and nextEntryToTransmit points to the first, the FIFO is full
//also if nextEntryToLoad == nextEntryToTransmit the FIFO is full and we exit without loading anything
if (( (( ptxFIFO->nextEntryToLoad >= ptxFIFO->numEntries) && (nextEntryToTransmit == 0)) ||
( ptxFIFO->nextEntryToLoad == nextEntryToTransmit)) && (ptxFIFO->nextEntryToLoad != INITIAL_ENTRY)){
*actualLoaded = 0; //FIFO is full already, we can't add anything
return 0; //this is not a failure, we just have nothing to do, this is indicated in actualLoaded
numLoaded = 0;
lclData = (usint *)data; //must use 16 bit writes to the module
//conditions are dealt with inside the for loop rather than in the for statement itself
for (FIFOentry = *actualStartIndex; ; FIFOentry++) {
//if we reached the end of the FIFO
//if the module is about to transmit the first element of the FIFO, the FIFO is full and we're done
//OR if the module is about to transmit the element we're about to fill in, we're done - the
//exception is if this is the first element we're filling in which means the FIFO is empty
if ((( FIFOentry >= ptxFIFO->numEntries) && (nextEntryToTransmit == 0)) ||
((FIFOentry == nextEntryToTransmit) && (FIFOentry != *actualStartIndex) )){
*actualLoaded = numLoaded;
//set nextEntryToLoad to the end of the FIFO, we'll set it to the beginning next time
//this allows us to distinguish between full and empty: nextEntryToLoad == nextEntryToTransmit means empty
ptxFIFO->nextEntryToLoad = FIFOentry;
return 0;
//we reached the end but can continue loading from the top of the FIFO
if ( FIFOentry >= ptxFIFO->numEntries)
FIFOentry = 0;
//load the control word
ptxFIFO->FifoData[FIFOentry * 3] = *lclData++;
//skip the high of the control word, the module only has a 16 bit field for control
lclData++;
//now put in the data
ptxFIFO->FifoData[(FIFOentry * 3) + 2] = *lclData++;
ptxFIFO->FifoData[(FIFOentry * 3) + 1] = *lclData++;
numLoaded++;
//we're done because we loaded everything the user asked for
if (numLoaded >= numWords) {
*actualLoaded = numLoaded;
ptxFIFO->nextEntryToLoad = FIFOentry+1;
return 0;
//if we reached here, we're done because the FIFO is full
*actualLoaded = numLoaded;
ptxFIFO->nextEntryToLoad = FIFOentry;
fclose (pFile);
return 0;
As you can see, I added a temporary diagnostic with the structures that were created in the "Handles by value" case, and print out the data. I see what is expected, whichever of the options I pick in the CLN!
I understood (from the information in the two links I mentioned in my original post, and from the name of the option itself) that "array data pointer" should pass the array of data itself, without the dimSize field. But that does not seem to be what is happening.
Batya
Attachments:
ExcM4k Load Transmit FIFO.vi ‏15 KB

Using Event Structures with Array of Clusters

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for