Using Frames in HtmlB.

Hai All,
I have created a JspDynPage component. In my Jsp file , i have used <frames> tag. But nothing is dispalyed on the iView.
I need to know whether we can use <frames> tag inside htmlB.
<%@ taglib uri= "tagLib" prefix="hbj" %>
<hbj:content id="myContext">
<hbj:page title="PageTitle">
<hbj:form id="myFormId">
<frameset rows="64,*,64">
<frame name="top" scrolling="no" noresize src="top.jsp">
<frameset cols="150,*">
 <frame name="contents" target="main" src="MenuContent.jsp">
 <frame name="main">
</frameset>
<frame name="bottom" scrolling="no" noresize src="foot.jsp">
</frameset>
</hbj:form>
</hbj:page>
</hbj:content>
Regards,
Eben

Hi Eben,
there is an HTMLB element for iFrames. It is called <a href="https://media.sdn.sap.com/javadocs/NW04s/SPS7/hb/com/sapportals/htmlb/htmlcontainer/IsolatedHtmlContainer.html">IsolatedHtmlContainer</a>. Have a look into it.
Perhaps it might solve your problems.
Best Regards,
Martin

Similar Messages

Using frameset in HTMLB

Hi All,
I am trying to use frames in a JSPDyn project, using HTMLB. But I am not able to see the frame content.
Can you tell me what tag should I use and how(sample).
Moreover, how to get the base URL so that I can set the src of frmae to some other JSP/HTML.

hi,
check out this thread.
Page setup with MVC - frames and bsp:call?
see also,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/11/c80b40c6c01961e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/9c/4ef7a71b4411d4b2c10050dade3b5e/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/95/7a28e20d7f11d3804600c04f99fbf0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
regs,
jaga

Is it possible to partially export a video using frame blending?

For example, I have a video intro that, after being uploaded and processed on YouTube, looks very choppy. However, if I export it using frame blending, it looks perfectly fine. The down side is that the rest of the video looks somewhat more blurry, as frame blending tends to do. I like how fluid the intro is when frame blended, but I perfer the rest of the video when it's just exported normally. I found an option called frame blend under the clip's video options, making me think that I could fix my problem, but it didn't seem like it did anything at all when I exported it. Is what I'm trying to achieve actually possible, or will I just have to deal with it, one way or the other?

1. I export in H.264 with the preset HDTV 720p 29.97 fps High Quality. I would use the YouTube preset, but it compresses the audio to a point where it sounds terrible. I'm sure there's a way to fix this, but I don't know enough about it to do so myself.
2. My sequence also runs at 29.97 fps.
3. The intro consists of several game capture clips all .avi at what I think is 29 fps. Many of the clips are sped up to at least 200%.

Firefox 4 is not saving pages (using frames) I visit in the history list, but Firefox 3 does. What could be wrong (may be related to no-cache)?

When using FF 3, I can go back through the history using the arrows on the toolbar. When using FF4, I can't. This applies to an internal site where the page uses frames and the header pragma "no-cache". This also happens in safe mode.

thom
I was reading the above post about typing in code to darwin, i have a similar problemWell,posting all that isn't necessary, and disguises your new post. I take it you mean you typed in the tail command and saw those messages?
localhost launchd:server 3d27 in bootstrap 1103 uid 0: "/usr/sbin/lookupd"[47]: exited abnormally: HangupDespite the word "abnormally", this is in fact normal and recurs frequently. The lookupd process is told to "hang up", i.e. quit, when it is done, and will restart as necessary.
I don't know what the "initcardwithstoreprefs failed" means: you need to set it in context of the other messages. But the main purpose of using the tail command is to look for "loginwindow exited" messages, and then see what came before them.
So, give a bit more detail about your problem: for a start, on which of your machines is this happening? Have you tried disconnecting any USB devices except for mouse and keyboard? In fact, give a lot more detail

Mixed AS Versions using frames

I have a site with two frames. Is it possible to load one
HTML document in one frame that contains an SWF published using AS
2.0 and another HTML document into the other frame that contains an
SWF published in AS 3.0?
I am not sure how this works in a browser that has the Flash
Player version 9 installed - can it handle both versions
concurrently if they are in different HTML doc and frames?

SymTsb - thanks for the response!
I guess I am just not sure exactly "how" the Flash Player
Plugin actually works inside a browser. I know the FlashPlayer9
will play EITHER an SWF saved using AS2.0 or AS3.0, but never
considered how it handled "mixed" versions. So I guess what you are
saying is that even without using "frames", if I were to link two
separate SWFs within the same HTML page that one could use AS3 and
the other AS2 and they would co-exist - is that right? If so, will
the AS2 SWF slow down the play performance of the AS3 SWF or are
they handled totally separate by the Player?

Should I use frames or what?

Here is my dilema. I'm working on a pretty big site. The site
has about 8
sections each which have about 10 subsections. I basically
created 8 pages
total for all of the subsections but I don't want to have to
create hundreds
of pages for all the subsections so since all the pages look
exactly
identical in the subsections is there a way I could just make
it so the only
content that changes when you go to one of the subsections is
the main
content table? I'm assuming to do this I would need to use
frames unless
there is another way I don't know of yet? Anyone got any
pointers?
Best Regards,
Chris Jumonville
503.277.3553

Chris Jumonville wrote:
> Here is my dilema. I'm working on a pretty big site. The
site has about 8
> sections each which have about 10 subsections. I
basically created 8 pages
> total for all of the subsections but I don't want to
have to create hundreds
> of pages for all the subsections so since all the pages
look exactly
> identical in the subsections is there a way I could just
make it so the only
> content that changes when you go to one of the
subsections is the main
> content table? I'm assuming to do this I would need to
use frames unless
> there is another way I don't know of yet? Anyone got any
pointers?
Frames wouldn't alleviate the need to create the many pages.
You'd still
need a seprate file for each page within each subsection.
What you're looking for is some manner of server technology -
be it ASP,
PHP, etc. - that allows you to utilize a template for the
page, and load
in only the content specific to the topic.
*** Remove the DELETE from my address to reply ***
======================================================
Kevin Scholl
http://www.ksscholl.com/
[email protected]
Information Architecture, Web Design and Development
We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of
the dreams...
======================================================

Using Frames in JSF

Can anyone provide an example on how to use frames inside JSF? I don't know how to define the framesets inside the jsf file. A simple example will go a long way. Thanks.

Nope, I'm not big on samples, especially of code I've never tried to write. Give it a try, if you have a problem post your code and we'll take a look.

Using frames in HtmlDB page

hi all
can you please help me with how to use frames in an htmldb page with a tabset .
i have a page in one tabset application i want to divide the page into frame and run a url in one of these frames
thanks

The performance of your pages are dependent on many factors. Just adding a tab should not have an impact on performance.
Regards,
Jerry
PortalPM

Paste doesn't work on IPad, on sites that use frames

I work for MindBody Inc. and a client of ours brought to my attention that paste simply doesn't paste on our site. This is quite annoying for them, and in trying to find a fix, I discovered that a fairly moderate bug in Safari on the IPad. Paste just simply doesn't work in frames.
Does anyone know how I would go about submitting a bug to Apple?
The test:
I've created the following test
frameTest.html
<html>
<head>
<title>Iphone frame test</title>
</head>
<frameset id="mainFrameset" rows="98,*" frameborder="0" framespacing="0" NORESIZE>
<frame name="topFrame" src="brianTest.html" frameborder="0" noresize scrolling="NO" >
<frame name="mainFrame" src="brianTest.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="YES">
</frameset>
</html>
brianTest.html:
<html>
<head>
<title>Testing IPad Paste</title>
</head>
<body>
Testing: <input type="text" name="test" />
</body>
</html>
When browsing the frameTest.html paste doesn't work. It shows up but clicking it pastes nothing.
Going to brianTest.html, paste works as expected.

Same problem with Atomic Web Browser on the websites using frames.
All the "identify web browser as" options have been tested, unsuccessfully.
It seems that the new iPad 4.2 iOS version solves the problem. I will test it on monday and post the results here. Stay tuned, or check it by yourself...
Message was edited by: Yoda65

CAN periodic transmit message with different modes using Frame API's

I want to transmit a CAN message periodically using Frame API's. I am able to send messages which dont have modes inside the message. For some messages having multiplexer in ".ncd " files and inside that multiplexer having different modes. Now in order to send all the modes of that message periodically by configuring them once by using Frame API's i did not find a way. I am able to send messages but the last updated mode is only sent periodically. Is there any way that CAN message having different modes can be sent periodically, updating all modes periodically automatically using Frame API's.

Hello Kpraveen,
You could set the period for N*Period, N being the number of modes. You just need to make sure your application changes the modes fast enough to update each periodic frame.
For example, say you have 2 modes and the frame's period should be 10ms. That means that you would like that frame to go out twice every 10ms, updating mode 1 and then mode 2. So, that means that the frames period can be 5ms.
1. It will start by updating mode1
2. 5ms later, it will update mode2
3. 5ms later it will update mode1 again
mode 1 really has a period of 10ms...
You just have to make sure that you can update the frame fast enough, or switch between modes fast enough, or you will send the same mode twice.
Let me know if this helps, or if I an not understanding this properly. Have a great day.
O. Proulx
National Instruments
www.ni.com/support

Can we use frames and jsps together..

Is it good to use frames with jsps.performence wise..bcos when iam calling jsps in frames it taking more time..to laod..
regards,

Remember, 2 frames == 2 HTTP requests. 3 frames == 3 requests, etc.
It will take longer of course. To think otherwise is crazy. However there are times when the benefits are there. I've used them, expecially if it's a situation where taking a little longer on the initial load makes all other accesses faster. This is particularly the case when I've got a fancy UI that uses lots of graphics. I don't need to load the graphics more than once so I put them in separate frames and only have one frame (which is mostly text) change content.

Must I use frames for this?

I have some external links that I'd like to keep within a
site versus opening a new browser window (for branding purposes).
Do I need to set up a page with frames to essentially bring those
sites into my main content area?
Thanks!
Eric

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050207030400080007010702
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
sorry, i left this part out of my last message, and just
wanted to
mention that i'm aware of the page history button next to the
back
button that allows you to choose which page to go back to,
and use it
often. but many people do not know about that handy option,
and would
instead just keep clicking the button until they get back to
where they
want to be.
that's all!
courtney (n h c) wrote:
> sorry, but i disagree. what if the visitor is taken to
the other site
> and starts clicking around in that site? then they have
to click the
> back button who knows how many times to get back to the
page they were
> on to begin with. i, personally, would much rather just
have to click
> the close button once on the new tab or window, than
click "back"
> however many times it takes me to back to the original
page.
> obviously, everyone has their own preferences, but i'm
gonna have to
> go with one click over several on this one. not to
mention, what if
> the new site has some kind of form on it that they fill
out? i doubt i
> have to tell you what happens with a lot of forms when
you try to
> click back to where you were before the form.
>
> also, what if the visitor gets caught up in the new
website and
> forgets where they started in the first place? the back
button won't
> help then. they're just gone. and my company has lost a
potential
> customer. but if the new site is in a different tab or
window, when
> they close it they'll see my site again, and be all
like, "oh yeah! i
> was looking at this site before. guess i'll look at it
some more."
>
> i guess i'm not so worried about people who don't notice
when a new
> window or tab is opening. it's fairly obvious when that
happens. and
> if it's that much of a concern, you can add an alert
pop-up that lets
> them know the link is opening a new window. i have a
link on one of
> the websites i work on that has an alert that says
something like
> "this link is opening a different website in a new
window. close that
> window to return to this site." i did this because
having it open in
> the same window was confusing people. they thought the
new site was
> part of ours.
>
> i'd be interested in other people's thoughts on this.
>
> Michael Fesser wrote:
>> .oO(courtney (n h c))
>>
>>
>>> yeah, that would probably be the only way to do
it. but i'd recommend
>>> just opening them in a new window. i've done it
with frames before, and
>>> it just doesn't work well. you're basically
trying to fit one website
>>> into another, and it generally looks horrible
(not to mention the
>>> various drawbacks involved in using frames in
general). i understand the
>>> desire to keep people on your site, but you can
achieve that by having
>>> the links open in a new window/tab, because your
site will still be
>>> there when the visitor closes the new
window/tab.
>>>
>>
>> It's an illusion that you can keep visitors on your
own site if you open
>> external links in a new window. People know how to
use a "back" button -
>> it's the second-most used function in a browser. New
windows/tabs might
>> even be confusing, because they break(!) this
important function.
>>
>> Frames and the 'target' attribute are not allowed in
all strict (X)HTML
>> standards for good reasons. It's best to simply link
to the other site,
>> without trying to mess with how or where the browser
will display it.
>> Let the browser and the user decide such things.
>>
>> <a href="
http://example.com">another
site</a>
>>
>> That's it. Can't get easier.
>>
>> Micha
>>
--------------050207030400080007010702
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
sorry, i left this part out of my last message, and just
wanted to
mention that i'm aware of the page history button next to the
back
button that allows you to choose which page to go back to,
and use it
often. but many people do not know about that handy option,
and would
instead just keep clicking the button until they get back to
where they
want to be. 
 
that's all! 
 
courtney (n h c) wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:[email protected]"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
sorry, but i disagree. what if the visitor is taken to the
other site
and starts clicking around in that site? then they have to
click the
back button who knows how many times to get back to the page
they were
on to begin with. i, personally, would much rather just have
to click
the close button once on the new tab or window, than click
"back"
however many times it takes me to back to the original page.
obviously,
everyone has their own preferences, but i'm gonna have to go
with one
click over several on this one. not to mention, what if the
new site
has some kind of form on it that they fill out? i doubt i
have to tell
you what happens with a lot of forms when you try to click
back to
where you were before the form. 
 
also, what if the visitor gets caught up in the new website
and forgets
where they started in the first place? the back button won't
help then.
they're just gone. and my company has lost a potential
customer. but if
the new site is in a different tab or window, when they close
it
they'll see my site again, and be all like, "oh yeah! i was
looking at
this site before. guess i'll look at it some more." 
 
i guess i'm not so worried about people who don't notice when
a new
window or tab is opening. it's fairly obvious when that
happens. and if
it's that much of a concern, you can add an alert pop-up that
lets them
know the link is opening a new window. i have a link on one
of the
websites i work on that has an alert that says something like
"this
link is opening a different website in a new window. close
that window
to return to this site." i did this because having it open in
the same
window was confusing people. they thought the new site was
part of
ours. 
 
i'd be interested in other people's thoughts on
this. 
 
Michael Fesser wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:[email protected]"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">.oO(courtney (n h c))
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">yeah, that would probably be the only way
to do it. but i'd recommend
just opening them in a new window. i've done it with frames
before, and
it just doesn't work well. you're basically trying to fit one
website
into another, and it generally looks horrible (not to mention
the
various drawbacks involved in using frames in general). i
understand the
desire to keep people on your site, but you can achieve that
by having
the links open in a new window/tab, because your site will
still be
there when the visitor closes the new window/tab.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
It's an illusion that you can keep visitors on your own site
if you open
external links in a new window. People know how to use a
"back" button -
it's the second-most used function in a browser. New
windows/tabs might
even be confusing, because they break(!) this important
function.
Frames and the 'target' attribute are not allowed in all
strict (X)HTML
standards for good reasons. It's best to simply link to the
other site,
without trying to mess with how or where the browser will
display it.
Let the browser and the user decide such things.
<a href=<a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="
http://example.com">"http://example.com"</a>>another
site</a>
That's it. Can't get easier.
Micha
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--------------050207030400080007010702--

How to sync/edit audio when using frame freeze or time remapping?

how to sync/edit audio when using frame freeze or time remapping? in premiere pro cs6

You need to give more information about what you want to happen to the audio when you freeze or time remap the associated video.
Is it synch video?
Is it music?
Is it Voice?
Generally .. you have to cut and design the audio around the video effect.

Does Firefox 23.0.1 support frames? p This page uses frames, but your browser doesn't support them. /p

Our webpage used to display perfectly in Firefox now it doesn't. When I view page source the following appears among the HTML: <pre><nowiki>This page uses frames, but your browser doesn't support them. </nowiki></pre>
Our webpage displays perfectly in IE 8.0
''Moderator added tags to show the HTML formatting tags and text.''

You only get the "This page uses frames, but your browser doesn't support them." text if either frames are disabled or you use a browser that doesn't support frames (the text is in a <noframes> </noframes> block). Firefox would display this text under normal conditions.
Note that the Menu object is IE only and doesn't work in Firefox. 
See the Browser Console (Firefox/Tools > Web Developer;Ctrl+Shift+J) for errors. 
The page source also shows red code for the map tag (start tag "map" seen in "table"). 
A lot of images seem to be missing or aren't loaded because of script errors.

Example of using frames in JSF

I am considering using frames in my JSF/JSP page but am having trouble getting started. I'd like to display my page as
Frame 2 | Frame1
Frame 3 |
I started using iFrames in my JSP page but because I needed Frame1 to be resizable, I dropped iFrames and started using Frames.
I wrote my JSP page to contain these frames. My JSF project compiles successfully but at runtime, my page appears blank in the browser window.
Can someone give me an example of using frames in a JSF/JSP page or point out the error in my JSP.
My page looks like:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jsp:root version="1.2" xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html" xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page" xmlns:ui="http://www.sun.com/web/ui">
<jsp:directive.page contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8" pageEncoding="UTF-8"/>
<f:view>
<ui:page binding="#{Page1.page1}" id="page1">
<ui:html binding="#{Page1.html1}" id="html1">
<ui:head binding="#{Page1.head1}" id="head1">
<ui:link binding="#{Page1.link1}" id="link1" url="/resources/stylesheet.css"/>
</ui:head>
<ui:body binding="#{Page1.body1}" id="body1">
<frameset rows="16%,84%">
<frame name="top" src="faces/overview/overview.html"/>
<frameset cols="30%,70%">
<frame name="left" src="faces/overview/leftPage.jsp"/>
<frameset rows="20%,80%">
<frame name="right" src="faces/overview/rightPage.jsp"/>
<frame name="right2" src="faces/overview/rightPage.jsp"/>
</frameset>
</frameset>
</frameset>
</ui:body>
</ui:html>
</ui:page>
</f:view>
</jsp:root>
thanks,
tsc

<frameset> should not be the child of the <body> element. It should be the child of <html> element.
This works:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jsp:root version="1.2" xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html" xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page" xmlns:ui="http://www.sun.com/web/ui">
<jsp:directive.page contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8" pageEncoding="UTF-8"/>
<f:view>
<ui:page id="page1">
<ui:html id="html1">
<ui:head id="head1">
<ui:link id="link1" url="/resources/stylesheet.css"/>
</ui:head>
<frameset cols="30%,70%">
<frame name="left" src="faces/Page1.jsp"/>
<frameset rows="80%,20%">
<frame name="top" src="faces/rightPage.jsp"/>
<frame name="bottom" src="faces/bottomPage.jsp"/>
</frameset>
</frameset>
</ui:html>
</ui:page>
</f:view>
<ui:form binding="#{bean.form1}" id="form1"/>
</jsp:root>
thanks,
tsc

Using Frames in HtmlB.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for