UTF-16: better than UTF-8? How to use?

I read about UTF-8/UTF-16 and found out, that UTF-16 characters all have the same encopded length while UTF-8 uses a more compact representation. But why does Eclipse just shows one line of strange characters (most times little squares) in my .java file when i switch Eclispe's encoding from UTF-8 to UTF-16? I thought Java is using UTF-16 internally all the time?

String aString = "jschell";
byte[] whateverEncodingBytes = myString.getBytes("whateverEncoding");aString is in UTF-16, no matter what. The encoding specified in the getBytes() method is the target encoding. So whateverEncodingBytes is an array of bytes stored in a whatever encoding, rather than UTF-16. If you just use the method getBytes() the array of bytes would be stored in the default encoding which is iso-8859-1 unless otherwise specified.
String aNewString = new String(whateverEncodingBytes, "whateverEncoding");
aNewString is UTF-16 again, no matter what. The encoding specified in the constructor is the source encoding. So whateverEncodingBytes are still in an encoding. But building a new String out of them requires an encoding conversion to occur, as the String must be in UTF-16. So we need to let the constructor know which encoding to convert from. It would be like an interpretter to know which language to interpret from.
A Java byte can be in any encoding it likes - it's simply eight raw bits of data stored in an arbitrary order. Anything extending a Java object is stored in UTF-8, except for String, which keeps its internal characters in UTF-16 encoding.
In short, if you pull data into Java from an external source, the encoding it sits in within Java sticks to the rules above. If it first hits Java as a byte stream (say from an InputStream), it's going to be in whatever encoding it was already in. If it first hits Java as a String (say from request.getParameter() in a servlet or JSP), it will be in UTF-16, as Java will convert its encoding immediately.
The same holds when writing back out. If you write out a series of bytes (such as with OutputStream), the resulting output is in the encoding the bytes were in to begin with. If you're outputting a String (although this is a lot rarer), it will be in UTF-16. Or to be more specific as somebody pointed out Java uses Unicode characters (16-bits, unsigned) in memory to hold characters.

Similar Messages

  • How to use Title 3D?

    Am I missing something out of the FCE HD box, or is this the Apple way?
    I recently purchased Final Cut Express HD and am trying to apply “Title 3D” and “Title Crawl”, but cannot find any guidance information either in the printed FCE User Manual or the internal Help section referencing these video generators.
    Also included in the FCE HD box was LiveType, which provides titling/animation software. No printed manual was included for LiveType but a 170 page Help section is embedded in the software which seems to be comprehensive enough and includes a tutorial exercise.
    I’m trying to develop some non-static titling for home movies, using a font with an embossed 3D like appearance. Would I be better off thoroughly learning how to use LiveType rather than wasting time clicking buttons on the Title 3D pane, which automatically pops up when the Title 3D Effect is dragged onto a FCE timeline? So far I can’t figure out the process of using all the buttons, the color bar, style palette.
    Thanks in advance to all of the experts that participate in these forums.
    BoBo
    iMac G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)   2.1 GHz with i Sight & 20" Display

    TangentIdea,
    Thank You, Thank You..........I found what I was looking for, and it was right under my nose, or I should say where you said I could find it, ....still in the box that I had shelved once I had FCE up and running.
    I feel embarrassed for posting the question in the first place, but that's what I like about these forums; you can ask a naive question and find someone gracious enough to get back to you.
    And I agree that LiveType is probably the option that I should pursue, but for now, Title 3D might be the quickest.
    Thanks again,
    BoBo

  • Tools.jar: how to use it?

    in my app, I use some classes of tools.jar
    but I can not find the jar file in JRE directory, which is only in JDK directory.
    if I distribute my app to customers, they can not use it, because they possiblly only installed JRE rather than JDK.
    so how to use tools.jar?

    Isn't tools.jar the JDK tools, e.g., javac, javap, etc.?
    What are you doing that requires those tools, such that your customer needs it?
    Secondly are you sure that Sun's license allows you to distribute the stuff in tools.jar?
    It seems like the only solutions would be to refactor your code to no longer use tools.jar, or tell your customers that they have to install the JDK themselves (I've seen other products do that), or to possibly get a special license from Sun.

  • How can we say if Join better than using Sub Queries ??

    Hi all,
    I am trying to understand the rationale behind "Is _Inner Join_ better than using _Sub Query_ ?" for this scenario ...
    I have these tables --
    Table1 { *t1_Col_1* (PrimaryKey), t1_Col_2, t1_Col_3, t1_Col_4 }
    -- Number of rows = ~4Million , t1_Col_3 has say 60% entries non-zero -----> (Condition 4)
    Table2 { *t2_Col_1* (PK), t2_Col_2, t2_Col_3 }
    -- Number of rows = ~150Million, t2_Col_2 maps to t1_Col_1 -----> (Condition 1). This means for every distinct value of t1_Col_1 (its PK) we'll have multiple rows in Table2.
    Table3 { *t3_Col_1* (PK), t3_Col_2, t3_Col_3 }
    -- Number of rows = ~50K, t3_Col_1 maps to t1_Col_2 -----> (Condition 2)
    Table4 { *t4_Col_1* (PK), t4_Col_2, t4_Col_3 }
    -- Number of rows = ~1K, t4_Col_2 maps to t3_Col_2 -----> (Condition 3)
    Now here are the 2 queries: -
    Query using direct join --
    SELECT t1_Col_1, t2_Col_1, t3_Col_1, t4_Col_2
    FROM Table1, Table2, Table3, Table4
    WHERE t1_Col_1=t2_Col_2 -- Condition 1
    AND t1_Col_2=t3_Col_1 -- Condition 2
    AND t3_Col_2=t4_Col_1 -- Condition 3
    AND t1_Col_3 != 0
    Query using SubQuery --
    SELECT t1_Col_1, t2_Col_1, t3_Col_1, t4_Col_2
    FROM Table2,
    (SELECT t1_Col_1, t3_Col_1, t4_Col_2
    FROM Table1,Table3, Table4
    WHERE
    AND t1_Col_2=t3_Col_1 -- Condition 2
    AND t3_Col_2=t4_Col_1 -- Condition 3
    AND t1_Col_3!= 0
    WHERE t1_Col_1=t2_Col_2 -- Condition 1
    Now the golden question is - How can I document with evidence that Type-1 is better than Type-2 or the other way ? I think the 3 things in comparison are: -
    - Number of rows accessed (Type-1 better ?)
    - Memory/Bytes used (Again Type-1 better ?)
    - Cost ( ?? )
    (PS - testing on both MySQL, Oracle10g)
    Thanks,
    A

    So, is it right to conclude that Optimizer uses the optimal path and then processes the query resulting in nearly the same query execution time ?If the optimizer transforms two queries so that they end up the same, then they will run in the same time. Of course, sometimes it cannot do so because of the the way the data is defined (nulls are often a factor; constraints can help it) or the way the query is written, and sometimes it misses a possible optimization due to inaccurate statistics or other information not available to it, or limitations of the optimizer itself.
    Is this the right place to ask for MySQL optimization ?Probably not.

  • How XI is better than BAPI method

    Dear all,
    How XI technology is better than BAPI method, with the help of BAPI we can connect Non SAP system with SAP then why XI is better and in what respect.
    Thanks,
    RP

    > Hi,
    > Can you connect BAPI with some DB system without XI?
    >
    > Cheers,
    > Jag
    Of course you can.
    Just develop a Java/.NET application that will call RFCs through JCo/.NET Connector and DB's through any driver you want.
    Regards,
    Henrique.

  • While updating iphone, itune gave me error of 1015 which tells that my iphone is much better than from which that i am updating. But now my iphone is still in restoring mode how i can resolve this problem.please tell me

    while updating iphone, itune gave me error of 1015 which tells that my iphone is much better than from which that i am updating. But now my iphone is still in restoring mode how i can resolve this problem.please tell me

    I just had the same problem with my iphone, only thing i could do was completely restore factory settings, lost a bunch of pics and contacts in the process... hope you have better luck than me

  • Nokia 5610 Firmare 6.60, how far better than Firmw...

    I know that Nokia takes its own sweet time to release firmware for any of their given phone models, typically 6 months or more.
    Considering the release time and the problems of restoring older firmware, how far the firmware v 06.60 is better than 4.81?
    Are the common problems like the one mentioned below, are solved? : -
    1. Phone restarting
    2. Jitter playback of video files of 30 fps. REMEMBER, the phone is incapable of playing video files smoothly, which are of 30 fps!
    3. Phone hanging
    Overall, what does firmware version v 06.60 offer? What good it does to the phone? If not good, What bad it does to the phone
    Is it recommended to existing phone owners to upgrade their phone firmware from 4.xx to 6.60?

    I didn't feel anything better or worse in v6.60.
    The major issue, hanging while playing music is still persist.

  • How is SAP MDM better than other tools?

    Hi- I want to know how is SAP MDM better than other tools? Thx

    Wrong Place to post this question.
    We may better tell how BI is better than other tools.

  • How can i prove rac on linux is better than on windows ?

    Hi all,
    Is there any document or any thread on this forum which will help me prove that RAC on linux is better than on windows. Actually i did not recommend to my management windows os for RAC, now the management wants the reason why did not recommend windows. I want some sort of proof or any document to prove my point. Please help ......

    > now the management wants the reason why did not recommend windows
    Then give them reasons. TCO. In-house experience and skills with Linux. Official support from vendors like Sun for Linux on their servers. Linux being used as the core development platform for Oracle. Linux proven as a cluster-based operating system - it leads the supercomputer/cluster market by a significant percentage.
    According to www.top500.org (listing the 500 fastest/biggest computers clusters on this planet)*:
    Operating System Family Top500
    Linux 85.20 %
    Mixed 6.80 %
    Unix      6.00 %
    Windows 1.20 %
    BSD Based 0.40 %
    Mac OS 0.40 %
    * (In other words, if Linux is good enough to run 85% of the world's fastest computers, it is more than good enough to run your company's RAC)
    There are numerous sound reasons for choosing Linux over Windows. But do not make performance claims that you cannot ever hope to backup with technical evidence.

  • Open DNS better than Comcast xfinity DNS?

    Is OpenDNS better than using Comcast/xfinity's DNS? If yes, how do I switch over?
    I go to into Airport Utility and enter in the 2 openDNS numbers, something like 222 and 220, but at the bottom of the page right now (because I am using Comcast's DNS) there's a web address something.comcast.net  Do I need to change that info too? If so, what do I put in that field?
    Thanks!

    How did you add them?
    If you are using a single computer: Open System Preferences/Network. Double click on your connection type, or select it in the drop-down menu, and in the box marked 'DNS Servers' add the following two numbers:
    208.67.222.222
    208.67.220.220
    (You can also enter them if you click on Advanced and then DNS)
    Sometimes reversing the order of the DNS numbers can be beneficial in cases where there is a long delay before web pages start to load, and then suddenly load at normal speed:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2296
    If your computer is part of a network: please refer to this page: http://www.opendns.com/start/bestpractices/#yournetwork and follow the advice given.
    (An explanation of why using Open DNS is both safe and a good idea can be read here: http://www.labnol.org/internet/tools/opendsn-what-is-opendns-why-required-2/2587 /
    Open DNS also provides an anti-phishing feature: http://www.opendns.com/solutions/homenetwork/anti-phishing/ )
    Wikipedia also has an interesting article about Open DNS:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDNS

  • IMovie capture quality better than anything FCP can offer for consumer DV?

    As a newbie to FCP, I have not found Capture, sequence, and export settings that is equal to or better than what iMovie 08 can create. Prior to this, I've been using iMovie 08 which is extremely user friendly. Just plug in the fire wire connections and it auto detects only one setting for DV. I am not sure what format it captures in but it does a good job. When I export out of iMovie 08 I use "using Quicktime" and choose the Uncompressed 8-bit NTSC method. The result is a decent, non-interlaced looking .mov file.
    The first time I tried to capture with FCP I chose the easy setup, where I would capture in the NTSC DV, sequence would be NTSC DV and export using the current settings in quicktime. The result was an interlaced and lowered quality vid.
    I have also tried the following combinations with no success with quality comparisons w/ iMovie 08:
    capt: NTSC dv, seq: NTSC DV, progressive exp: Uncompressed 8-bit
    capt: Uncompressed 8-bit, seq: Uncompressed 8-Bit exp: Uncompressed 8-bit
    This last one came close, but still iMovie 08 was better.
    My assumption is that FCP would contain the settings to duplicate or even out perform iMovie's export quality for consumer video dv. I viewed iMovie as little brother and FCP as big brother. Shouldn't FCP produce equal to or better quality than iMovie 08? And what are the settings for this?
    Thanks

    Thank you for clearing up my confusion. How is my export from iMovie 08, using "Uncompressed 8-bit" coming out progressive (I see no interlaced, odd/even scan lines)? Is this export dropping lines/information? If so, uncompressed is not an appropriate name for the export.
    I understand what you are saying about "getting quality back" on export. My initial question was comparing the quality of an iMovie 08 export vs. FCP export and having the problem of a lowered output from the FCP export.
    If anyone has the time, would they try a short experiment:
    1. From your DV source, camera or deck connect to your computer
    Capture a short clip via iMovie 08 a short clip in standard 4:3.
    Export using Quicktime, Uncompressed 8-bit setting
    2. From your DV source, camera or deck, connect to your computer.
    Capture the same short clip to FCP using Easy set up for NTSC DV. Export with current settings.
    3. Compare the two.

  • Is verizon really better than AT&T?

    I've seen so many ads tha say verizon is better and more reliable than AT&T. Is this really true? I've compared coverage maps, and they looks almost the same, except for LTE coverage, but as far as 3G goes, they look about the same. What makes verizon so much better?

    pzjagd1 wrote:
    How does JD Powers rate customer satisfaction (not coverage)? I can't imagine it being very high for Verizon.
    hard to believe after reading the forums, but Verizon consistently is ranked highest in customer satisfaction of the big 4  US cellular companies.  But do remember, what you see in the forum is only a small sampling of the worst problems that happen and represent a fraction of 1% of customers.   Therefore it is not a scientific sample to judge the whole.  

  • What's better than Illustrator?

    I've been using Illustrator for many years and several versions.  My usage is nominal and occasional/once a week, and I don't get very sophisticated for my needs, so it has been OK so far. I do not do commercial work but know Ai is the "de-facto std".
    But I read this forum often and see many criticisms of Ai and I do have occasional issues with Illy with tools and UI....just not as easy or robust as it could/should be...cumbersome at times.
    I see JET and others here make great use of Illy but also criticize (justifiably) it for not being as good as other vector tools.
    I know there are competitors, Inkscape is free, others less costly than Illy; and seemingly better/easier/faster to use...at least for some things.
    So my question: What is better than Illustrator (I'm using CS5) and why? What can they do better than Ai?  Is it worth having a second program and learning (tho I suspect the learning curve should be easy as they do similar things but have different GUI).  Or replacing Illy with something?
    Pro's/Con's that would make one make the effort to try/use something else?  I don't even know what out there is better than Illy.  I've searched www and got a few hints but nothing very significant.
    Am I wasting my time looking?
    Your feedback welcomed to help me decide whether to explore/trial other programs.

    I see JET and others here...criticize (justifiably) it for not being as good as other vector tools.
    I can't speak for "and others", but since I'm the only one you mention by name:
    If you've already deemed the criticism justifiable, then you must already know what that criticism says. When I criticize Illustrator, I don't just say "Illustrator is crap" and leave it at that, unsupported. I'm careful to explain myself with facts pertinent to the context of the discussion. I actually own and know how to use the other programs to which I compare. I've often posted lists of comparitive features.
    I've always used my real name here and sign all my posts with my initials. So finding my comments is not difficult.
    I know there are competitors, Inkscape is free, others less costly than Illy; and seemingly better/easier/faster to use...at least for some things. So my question: What is better than Illustrator (I'm using CS5) and why? What can they do better than Ai?
    Didn't you just answer your own question? Other than the broadly general things you just mentioned, what program do you want to compare, and for doing what? Surely you're not asking someone to do an exhaustive feature-by-feature comparison between Illustrator and all similar programs in this one thread?
    All you've said about what you use Illustrator for is that your use is nominal, occasional, unsophisticated, and non-commerical. Mine isn't. Commerical graphics has been my livelihood for over 40 years. Vector-based illustration is both a speciality and a passion.
    I...knowAi is the "de-facto std"
    "Defacto standard" is self-fulfilling. It's effectively equivalent to saying "More people use Illustrator because more people use Illustrator."
    So what? More people ride Vespa scooters than KTM motorcycles. But which one would you call "professional quality"? You can use either one to pick up a gallon of orange juice at the corner store. But if you enter an enduro, the KTM will get the job done with alot less stress.
    The myth is that most software buyers choose the best. That's as naive as the faith that most voters do.
    Illustrator has been slothfully resting on its "defacto standard" haunches since the dark ages (AKA the 80s). "Defacto standard" be hanged.
    I do have occasional issues with Illy with tools and UI....just not as easy or robust as it could/should be...cumbersome at times.
    Okay. What issues? State something specific and users actually familiar with other programs can compare.
    This is the 21st century. There's really little new under the sun here. A 2D drawing program is just an interface pasted on top of mostly the same old geometric functionality. The competitive advantage goes to the offering that best (easy) and most fully (robust) empowers the user. The multiplication of easy and robust yields elegance. That's a term I've never applied to Illustrator. Illustrator is one of the oldest of the bunch, lounging under the sun for so long it's at risk of skin cancer. Yet it still fails to provide basic functionality users of other drawing programs have taken for granted for decades.
    Examples that may be germane to your casual, non-commerical use? Try these things in Illustrator:
    Star Tool: Draw a star. Now change the number of points it has.
    Arc Tool: Draw 36 degrees of a circular arc.
    Label that star with a dimension.
    Distribute a group of different objects along a curve.
    Uniformly space Blend steps along a non-uniform curve.
    Attach a Blend to a closed path and have the first/last instances properly positioned.
    Knife Tool: Cut across an open unfilled path.
    Connect a text label to an object that stays connected when you move it.
    Paste a simple graphic into a text string so that it flows with the text.
    Perform a Find/Replace on carriage returns.
    Round Corners: Apply it to an accute or obtuse angle and have it actually yield the radius you specify.
    Crop a raster image.
    Rotate something. Go back later and find out what its rotation angle is.
    Pathfinders: Use them without wrecking existing fills/strokes.
    I could go on (and have). How long a list do you want? All the features/functions associated with the above basic operations (and many more) are substandard, half-baked, or even non-existent in Illustrator. This is "professional"-grade software? No, it's largely consumerish rubbish sold at exhorbitant prices just because it's the "defacto standard."
    Is it worth having a second program and learning...
    Obviously, it is to me (and a third, and a fourth, and...). As I've said many times in this forum, I don't know how anyone can legitimately claim to compare two programs if they've only got workaday familiarity with one.
    As with any other endeavor, the more drawing programs you're comfortable with, the less arduous it is to pick up another, because you tend to pick up on the underlying principles involved, as opposed to just becomming habituated to a particular program's command locations and procedures by rote.
    But you've been using AI for "many years" and find it to be "OK". So if you're happy with it, use it.
    I have a cheap, consumerish Ryobi table saw and it's "OK." But I didn't pay a professional-grade price for it, either. And I'm sure not going to write glorious reviews on it, call it "professional," and get all fearfully brand-loyal defensive about it if someone dares suggest I might ought to learn to use a different one. My use of it, like yours, is merely occasional. But I also presently need to build a TV cabinet, and I'm dreading it. If I were to open a cabinet shop, I'd be much more discriminating, and would do my own homework to make an informed decision.
    Or replacing Illy with something?
    One doesn't have to "replace." There's nothing any more wrong with using more than one 2D drawing program than there is with using more than one 3D modeling program, or raster imaging program, or page layout program, or word processor, or video edting program, or....
    Pro's/Con's that would make one make the effort to try/use something else?
    That depends on what one is doing with it. Not knowing that, I can again only offer generalities that matter to me: If you've only ever used one program of a particulat kind, you're rather in the dark regarding functionality that you may be missing that may be important to you. (Second-degree ignorance: You don't know what you don't know.) If you're mission-dependent upon that one program, you're also kind of captive to the whims and agenda of its vendor.
    That very well may not matter to you, given your nominal, occasional, unsophisticated, and non-commerical use. And if so, that's fine.
    I don't even know what out there is better than Illy. I've searched www and got a few hints but nothing very significant.
    But you just said you've been reading a bunch of posts here which mention other programs.
    Am I wasting my time looking?
    Only you can answer that about your time. Time is all any of us have.
    Your feedback welcomed to help me decide whether to explore/trial other programs.
    No offense, but frankly it sounds like you're just not motivated enough to do your own homework. If you are  sufficiently motivated, visit the websites of other drawing program vendors. Read the features lists. Dowload the demos, read the documentation, and try them out. Visit the programs' user forums. Or, if it's really not that important to you, don't.
    If you've got questions about specific functionality and/or specific programs, be more specific about what you do (or want to do).
    JET

  • Re: On 105 mbps plan but never get better than 22 mbps

    I am living in this SAME nightmare!  Help.  I spent ALL day yesterday 8 hours on the phone with many many different people, some who were just plain RUDE and others who all contradicted each other. Sent me to get a new modem and we did that, speed still like the above.Called today, got a decent guy he tried helping for a while then phone cut out.  No call back.UMMM really?  Then yesterday during Chat, they guy just shut me off.I have 105 per my preferred bundle.  Really want to get that.  SOOOO Angry, if they did NOT have MONOPOLY on my community I would switch.  I however have NO one to switch to.  SO unamerican.  Poor service, HIGH prices. I left service center in tears as I watched elderly couple hobble out on their canes wondering how they can pay the increase to their bill.  That is just NOT right.  

    X1DESMO wrote:
    I just got the same svc hooked up today and I too am only gettign mid 20's ?!?!?    Using my own modem Motoroal SB6121 ( certifed on the Comcast site to work with even the 150 speed tier.. And a Neggear N300 router ( capable of over 300MBs) and only mid 20's Seriously?...  I get 25 upload???    Go to my parent s place they have the Comcast provided Modem router combo unit ( also wireless N) and the 50 MB svc, I get a solid 62 over there witht the same laptop and ipad.   WHAT GIVES? The technition made a comment that has me very concerned.. " I have NEVER seen anyone with the Extreem 105 pkg get better than 50 over Wi Fi, even with the COmcat modem in the same roon."  This I will be looking into ove the next several days, as that is a totally unaccepable answer, we pay for 105 ALL of our equipment is rated to levels ABOVE 105 and we cant get HALF of that... Soory Comcast this wont fly, if that is in fact "just how it is"   I see a class action suit coming there way for sure as its blantant fals advertising.  If/and/or when I get it solved i will be sure to post up here..Try this: http://forums.comcast.com/t5/Basic-Internet-Connectivity-And/Connection-Troubleshooting-Tips/td-p/1253575

  • Whether installing 64bit OS is better than 32bit in a 64 bit PC?

    Hallo friends,
    Now a days 64bit PCs are more common. But I think Operating systems and programs have not attained  capacity to fully exploit the power of 64bit machines. (Of course Linux is better than MS counterparts in 64bit zone). If it is sensible to stick with 32bit for better experience in terms of stability and performance? What are the pros and cons of both methods? How we can attain maximum from 64bit PC?   Since every one with a 64bit PC have tried both architectures, feed back opinions and suggestions in the above thread is anticipated from everyone.
    Thanks to all
    mvdvarrier

    I've made some tests with current Arch i686 and x86_64 on a old AMD Turion 64ML-30
    MD5 Bruteforce attack:
    i686: 43,5s
    x86_64: 31,2s
    import md5
    import sys
    haslo = 'kogut'
    hasz_hasla = md5.new(haslo).hexdigest()
    def make_word(m, base_string=False):
    znaki = 'qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm'
    for i in znaki:
    if base_string:
    string = base_string + i
    else:
    string = i
    if md5.new(string).hexdigest() == m:
    print 'Podane Haslo to: ' + string
    sys.exit()
    elif len(string) < 5:
    make_word(m=m, base_string=string)
    make_word(hasz_hasla)
    Untar Gentoo stage3 to /dev/null:
    i686: 48,3s
    x86_64: 42,3s
    Make a thumb out of 3,1MB jpeg file with convert:
    i686: 1,62s
    x86_64: 1,28s
    Make avi from Big Buck Bunny with ffmpeg:
    (ffmpeg -i big_buck_bunny_480p_stereo.ogg a.avi) making mpeg didn't work on i686 - segmentation fault
    i686: 276s
    x86_64: 295s
    Make mpeg from Big Buck Bunny with mencoder:
    (mencoder big_buck_bunny_480p_stereo.ogg -oac lavc -ovc lavc -o a.mpeg)
    i686: 263s
    x86_64: 251s
    Last edited by Riklaunim (2008-10-18 21:04:28)

  • Why is InDesign better than MS Publisher

    The company that I work for is looking into updating there catalog and the software they use to make it. At the moment it is publisher. They are leaning more for InDesign because I know how to use that program. But for the proposal to buy the software I need more evidence that it is a better program than publisher besides my opinion on it.
    Thanks,
    Emma

    From a "We need to upgrade — and here's why" perspective, it probably comes down to "InDesign is the industry standard."
    Publisher isn't designed — or targeted, really — to professional publishing or design of any kind. Publisher is an entry level program, designed more for home users and basic office publishing (for secretaries and administrative personnel and the like).
    See it's wikipedia entry here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Publisher
    — Printing companies don't like — or won't accept — Publisher files.
    — InDesign has powerful text and graphic features that Publisher doesn't.
    — InDesign includes time-saving features (links, scripts, etc.) that Publisher can't match.
    There are a million other reasons, including "Like, d'uh."
    d

Maybe you are looking for

  • I upgraded my PC to iTunes 10.5 and now it doesn't see my iPod touch 4g

    the PC sees the iPod as a camera but iTunes does not see it. I went through all the trouble shooting steps suggested in the support tool - to no avail.  iPod Touch 4g OS 4.3.5.  Is it just me or is this a known issue?

  • Constrain Browser to size of background image

    I have my background image at 770 x 989. I inserted 1 table cell at 100% and imported the background image into it. How do I keep the browser from enlarging bigger than the table cell? I'm using DW CS3 and have Firefox as my main browser. I'm on a ma

  • How to send an SMS with text and image

    I'm trying to add a photo and text to an SMS but can't add anything in the body of the SMS. What do I need to do?

  • ***Raising Alerts When the message is struck in the Queue

    Hi Experts, Is there any way of Raising Alerts When the message is struck in the Queue I want to notify the user if the message is struck in Queue(smq1,smq2).Please let me know the same. Thanks, Srinivasa

  • Error installing Database Instance in WAS 6.40

    Dear All I try to install Database Instance using R3 load mechanism (via image) but got this error; WARNING 2006-12-05 02:01:30 The step FillNodesTable with step key SAPSYSTEM_DB|ind|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|SAPSYST EM|ind|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|SAPComponent|ind