Validation unsuccessful in migo error.

I am getting error in MIGO as Validation unsuccessful
Message no. GB071.

Hi,
What is the error message no you are getting during the goods issue. Could you elaborate the process.
Regards,
velu

Similar Messages

Hit error Validation Unsuccessful in MIGO

Dear SAP expert and guru,
Would like to seek for your assistant to to check whats wrong with the goods issue that I always hit error Validation Unsuccessful error.
I was able to post goods issue for the similar PO last week without any error message, however I am hitting the error now while posting the similar PO in post goods issue.
Thank you
Regards
Leonard Tan Jian Wen

Hi,
What is the error message no you are getting during the goods issue. Could you elaborate the process.
Regards,
velu

Error as " RC=     3 GB                   071 Validation unsuccessful" whi

I am getting error as " RC=     3 GB                   071 Validation unsuccessful" while doing ML81N.
When I have checked found that it is because Internal Order(which is created through KO01) has not been updated in PO.When I update error doesnt appear.Need your sugestion on this Is it necessary to enter Internal Order.

I am getting error as " RC=     3 GB                   071 Validation unsuccessful" while doing ML81N.
When I have checked found that it is because Internal Order(which is created through KO01) has not been updated in PO.When I update error doesnt appear.Need your sugestion on this Is it necessary to enter Internal Order.

"Could not complete your request because it is not a valid Photoshop document." Error

Hey,
I've been getting the "Could not complete your request because it is not a valid Photoshop document." error in one of my PSDs.
Here are just some notes:
The original file type is .psd, not a tiff whatsoever, and the file extension is purely myfilename.psd, not other random weird name
PSD file (in case you need it): https://www.mediafire.com/?1xkz2aki87p3kqc
I did not update my Photoshop or anything
It'd be great if solutions were suggested, I need this PSD file recovered desperately for a project.
Thanks

Very well. Try this with your Mac:
Open "new.psd" in Preview
File > Save
new.psd becomes new.png If the extension was correct, Preview would not have changed it.
it now opens in Photoshop You can download it here. ("Save image As...)
Simply put, you had the wrong extension.

I'm trying to reinstall photoshop CS5 in a new laptop but i have an "The serial number is not valid for this product" error

I'm trying to reinstall photoshop CS5 in a new laptop (pc) but i have an "The serial number is not valid for this product" error.
I have deactivated photoshop in the old computer.
The old laptop have photoshop installed with the DVD but the new laptop don't have DVD so i downloaded cs5 from Download CS5 products. ¿Maybe doing this is an error?

the installation files work the same whether from a disc or download, but there are other ways to mismatch a serial and installer.
Error "The serial number is not valid for this product" | Creative Suite

W3c valid site, initially no error reported by developer toolbar. But upon right click (giving the validation menue), the the toolbar reports two errors: width and height. Despite the fact that every page is validated! On the forum for the toolbar, this i

w3c valid site, initially no error reported by developer toolbar. But upon right click (giving the validation menue), the the toolbar reports two errors: width and height. Despite the fact that every page is validated! On the forum for the toolbar, this is said to be a Browser error. So, how can this be fixed? I'm using FF 3.6.6
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== after update from 3.5?

Hi Sara,
Can you give us the URL of the page you're having problems with and of the forum thread you mentioned?
Thanks!

Error during MIGO-Error during maint. of delivery costs in master condition

Hi
We are getting error as below during MIGO against a PO with doc type NB:
"Error during maint. of delivery costs in master conditions, Delivery cost conditions in different validity periods not identical"
What might be cause??
Thanks
Maruthi

Check the delivery conditions in condition tab of PO.
Try to check if there are any delivery condition records mainatined.
I think the problem is mostly due to overlapping validity period. Try to change the validity period for the same.

MIGO error with Return Delivery

Dear guru ,
We have a requirement where we:
1.) Create a PO for a material using ME21N.
2.) Post GR using MIGO
3.) Post Return Delivery using MIGO with movement type 122, with "Return Delivery" flag set.
When I post return delivery the system send me this error :
VL 384 Sales Unit is not valid for item 000010
How can I solve this problem ?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
For return delivery, system always check the settings of material master in the distribution channel of intercompany transfer.
If you have 2 dis channels for e.g 01 , 02
And 02 is your intercompany dis channel then you have to maintainmaterial master in 02 for retur delivery.
Kindly check the sales unit in this dis channel. You may get some help for this.
Regards
Karan

Cannot create MIGO - Error message No. ME573

Dear Expert,
I cannot create good receipt for material import , there is an error mesage "transaction cannot be posted due to errors in price determination For [x] error during maintain of delivery cost in master condition. delivery cost conditions in different validity periods not identical.
is this error due to the change of configuration we did to the enhancement LIV report, actually all the condition type is in amount but we make changes to it, we changed to percentage. these changes are made on 1st of March 2010. to all the PO created before 1st March 2010 we had made correction of their condition type to percentage but for PO that already had the shipping before 1st March 2010 , the condition type cannot be changed.
I cannot create MIGO for this PO.
is this because of inconsistency in config setting in PO document (condition type: amount), whereas in SPRO setting condition type has been changed to percentage.
Please advice... what should I do to be able to create MIGO ?
Thanks
Pauline

Hi,
Please, kindly check also the attached note:
447374 - ME573 "Transctn cannt be postd due to errrs in prce detrmntn".
As this note states, there is a new system behaviour as of the
implementation of the also attached Note 446831. Please, check this
note 446831 for further information regarding the reasons.
This new program behaviour which initiates error ME573 can be
deactivated if necessary via a switch, as described in Note 447374.
Best regards
Erika

While creating migo error 08 2011 is not found

pls
help me iam getting error in migo 08 2011while posting
Edited by: prashanth.k.s. on Aug 11, 2011 8:50 AM
Edited by: prashanth.k.s. on Aug 11, 2011 8:51 AM

Hi,
You cannot revert back once the MMPV is intialized you can only allow back posting for one month in MMRV.
For reverting the Posting periods refer the below OSS Note it may help you..
OSS note: 487381
Summary
Symptom
For period closing with initialization, the system displays a message saying that period closing cannot be started.
Before you start period closing with initialization, you must be aware of the consequences of period closing with initialization.This note describes the possible data inconsistencies that might occur if you carry out the initialization in a productive system.The resulting inconsistencies are not to be traced back to a system error but they are a result of the period closing program with initialization.
Hence, these inconsistencies can only be corrected within the remote consulting purchased separately since normally you no longer need to start the period closing program with initialization in a release > Rel. 4. 5.
Other terms
MMPI, PIINKON, MMINKON, RMMMINIT, MMINKONH, history records, MARDH, MBEWH, MM016, MM 016
Reason and Prerequisites
The prerequisite up to Release 4.6C is the implementation of Note 369637.
Solution
In order to be able to have the period closing program running, you must reserve parameter ID MMPI_READ_NOTE with the current date in the user parameters with the current date in form YYYYMMDD (Y = year, M = month, D = day).
If you already need this additional security beforehand, implement the attached correction instructions and create SET/GET parameter MMPI_READ_NOTE.The SET/GET parameter belongs to development class MG and should have the following short text:
'Follow the instructions in Note 487381 before initialization '.
In addition, change message MM(016):
'Follow the instructions in Note 487381 before initialization'.
The SAP system works with the period concept of stocks.In the system, postings are updated precisely to the period.The inventory balances of the current and of the previous period are relevant to posting.As of Release 4.5, the history concept of the inventory balances has been introduced as an enhancement.
Bear in mind that the initialization of a posting period has the following effects concerning the period stocks:
The initialization of the posting period to a previous or to any posting period may lead to the loss of the information of the inventory balances of the previous periods.The book value of the current posting period is taken as the basis also for values of the previous period in this case.
If you want to continue working with this new posting period, in addition you should execute report Z_DEL_HIST_ENTRIES attached so that history entries greater or equal to the new posting period will be deleted.
If you have to briefly reset the posting period by one period (for example, postings must still be posted in a certain period) just to make a correction (and for a small number of postings), you should initialize the posting period back again to the old value so that the values of the previous period will not be lost (you should forbid postings when carrying out corrections).
However, afterwards the values of the previous period or the history records (as of Release 4.5) of the materials posted in this case are inaccurate.
You should NOT execute report Z_DEL_HIST_ENTRIES in this case.
However, if the posting period is generally reset again to a previous posting period and if postings were made during this time, all information on the inventory balance of the previous periods is lost.
As of Release 4.5a, you should use the cited correction report Z_DEL_HIST_ENTRIES in order to delete history records that are more current than the current posting period.Otherwise, it can result in deviations (inconsistencies) for the update of the history records.
Important! If there are open physical inventory documents that have status 'counted' or for which indicator 'Freeze inventory balance' has been set, you should reject these if they refer to a previous period or have been created in the former previous period.The inventory difference to be posted can be determined from the current book value of the previous period and the book quantity frozen in the physical inventory document (ISEG-BUCHM) and does not match the inventory balance of the previous period that is currently valid.

MIGO error while posting..!!!

H Alli,
Getting below error while posting in MIGO:
"Account 413501 requires an assignment to a CO object"
Regards,
Amit

Hi
Check whether profit centre is assigned to your material at sales general plant data
If not , then give profit centre and create a fresh cycle and see
Regards
Raja

MIGO-Error when MIGO is execute by call transaction on background

When we execute MIGO_TR or MIGO_GI in call transaction, this error is showed.
"RAISE_EXCEPTION" " "
"CL_GUI_CUSTOM_CONTAINER=======CP" or "CL_GUI_CUSTOM_CONTAINER=======CM001"
"CONSTRUCTOR"
Is there any alternate function available for the MIGO and avoiding the same error.
Thanks in advance.
Walter

Hi Walter,
MIGO is a SAP Enjoy transaction so BDC is not supported on the same.
Regards,
Atish

MIGO error 'Purchase Order does not contain a confirmation control key'

Hi,
while posting GR to a PO i am getting an error ' Purchase order XXXXXXXXX does not contain a confirmation control key'
it is true that i have not defined any confirmation control key in PO, Aknowled rerd checkbox is also not ticked
Still why this message coming, what setting would be bringing this message
Please clarity

Hi,
Until the installation of Note 589422 (with SP SAPKH46C43) you could due to a program error - create a delivery even though the purchase order did not contain any confirmation control key.
This is now prevented through error message M7394. The transfer of this check (Confirmation control key existing in the purchase order, see Note 589422) was necessary as otherwise you could post a purchase order as desired. (Refer to also Note 616944 -> SAPKH46C44)
589422 Several inbound deliveries can be created with MIGO :
"Implement the program correction.
With Transaction SE91 create message M7394 with the message text:
Purchase order & & does not contain a confirmation control key".
After you implemented this correction, when you want to create an
inbound delivery with Transaction MB01 or MIGO or with
BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE and if the purchase order does not contain a
confirmation control key the system displays error message M7394
"Purchase order & & does not contain a confirmation control key".
Hope this can explain the error you met.
Regards,
Mauro

MIGO error

Hi All,
This regarding Txn MIGO.
In this txn the screen changes with the business transaction we enter e.g. if we choose Good Reciept the Screen fields and heading changes to Good Reciepts, and if we choose Transfer Posting The screen changes accordingly...
In actual this should happen....
But in our case this is not happening ...i.e. by default it is Good Recipts Screen but as we choose Transfer Posting ,it is not changing, because of that we are getting movement type error.
We know that somewhere we have missed some config..
Please suggest..
Thanks
R

Thanks for reply Vipin,
Let me tell you what exactly is happening...
We have done a BDC for MIGO for automatically Posting for txn type Transfer Posting ...
In BDC we are using A08 for selecting Transfer Posting....
Accordingly the screen has to change for Transfer Posting with corresponding Movement types....
But in actual whn we execute the BDC, The txn Type changes to A08 Tranfer Posting with Others but the screen still shows the Good recipt Others....
dont know where is the problem...
It is working fine in Dev server but in Prod it is giving this problem and due to this it is giving us the error 'Movement type 301 is not planned for this operation"....
In production the txn type name is also changed from Transfer Posting to A08 Transfer Posting....thats why i asked earlier that does it affect the config...
so please suggest the solution....
Thx R

MIGO Error -while refering the subcontracting challan

Hi all
1.)We purchsed material from vendor A & send these material to vendor B directly for Job work ( for this we have seperate PO with subcontractor)
2.) In Material PO we tick SC vendor & give vendor B.
3.) Then made GR(with only part 1)
4.) MMBE report shows stock provide to vendor B.
5.) After that we made subcontracting challan for vendor B with reference to GR number.
6.)Then capture and post the Excise invoice no
7.) Now when I am trying to the GRN of subcontracting PO and refering the subcontracting challan , system is throwing an error " Challan material is different from material document "
Usualy in the normal scenario, while doing the 541 movement type , we use to refer the subcon PO(by making the PO no field mandatory/optional against the movement type 541 in customization ) , as during MIGO, system checks the PO no against the material issued and PO against the GRN is being done, if it does't matches, then the above error comes.
But in the above scenario, there is no way to give the reference of giving the subcon PO during 101 "o" . that is why , this error is coming.
Please suggest the way out , how to deal this scenario.
Thanks & Regards
Nitin Chhabra

hi nitin
pls refer following link
Re: SUBCONTRACT J1IFQ ERROR
Vipin

Validation unsuccessful in migo error.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for