Validity Date in Blanket Order (FO)

Hi Folks!
Is the validity date in a blanket order type FO with limit item type B only for information or is there a chance that during Logistic Invoice Verification validity end date will be checked.
My goal is that after validity end date no invoice posting should be possible. I tried to activate invoice tolerance limit ST with value zero, but didn't work.
Does anybody have an idea?
Rgds.
Dieter

Hi Folks,
Re the concept of this solution which is similar to what I am trying to achieve i.e. I am trying to do a check on Blanket PO value and Invoice value i.e. tolerance key LA and give a message if the invoice value exceeds the PO total value by a set percentage and NOT a fixed value.
That is, I need the user to receive an informational message if the total invoices payments (via MIRO) have exceeded the expected value of the blanket PO. It shouldn't stop the MIRO payments as expected values are never guaranteed to be totally correct.
For this I have set msg 298 to be an Info message in OMRM. I have set the value to be checked for 10% in OMR6  in LA.
Despite these being in place, when I enter an invoice in MIRO with values taking it way beyond the PO expected value for testing purposes, no messages are shown and the invoice is posted. I am now thinking that these messages can only be sent if it is an ordinary PO with a value expecting to get only 1 invoice against it.
Any help on where I am going wrong here would be greatly appreciated.
Regards
Jim

Similar Messages

  • Validity date in limit orders

    even though the vilidity date in limit order is past,in EBP the system allows to do GR but it fails in R/3(extened classic scenerio).
    Is there possibity to set waring message when the date in the limit order is past at thetime of goods recipt in EBP.
    How to achieve it.
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    Have a look at tolerance keys LA and LD these allow toelrances to be set for Limit Orders.
    Regards
    Chris

  • Blocking a Blanket PO invoice by validity date

    Hi folks,
    I thought we could block a blanket POs invoice based on validity date too.
    What I did ---
    - set up as 60 in OMR6 for 'LD Blanket PO time limit exceeded'.
    - However, I could still post the invoice.
    Anything missing?

    Hi,
    The system determines the number of days by which the invoice is outside the planned time interval. If the posting date of the invoice is before the validity period, the system calculates the number of days between the posting date and the start of the validity period. If the posting date of the invoice is after the validity period, the system calculates the number of days between the posting date and the end of the validity period.
    Please note that the system compares the number of days with the with the absolute upper limit defined.
    Just check

  • Framework order/blanket order

    HI All,
    I need help about frame work order. Before writing this thread , I did lot of search for answer but I am not successful in finding resolution hence this post.
    I have created framework order; doc type FO. Item cat = B, For testing purpose , I entered validity dates as 21 nov and 22 nov in the PO. Now when I try to post invoice with invoice date (as well as posting date) as 11/23, system accepts without giving any error or warning about exceeding validity period. i.e. system is not stopping from posting invoice..! so what is the effect of validity dates on the invoice posting?
    Another important issue is that , in the invoice I am not able to enter invoice amount. For this issue I searched a lot but there is no statisfactory answer. I know very well that on the MIRO screen , I need to click on the account assignment button and enter the amount. However while entering this amount, system asks for G/L account which I can not enter as it is grayed out. So not sure how to enter invoice for the framework order. Is there any config settings?
    I did this testing after maintaining tolerance limits "LA-Amount of blanket purchase order" and "LD-Blanket PO time limit exceeded"  in the config. For LA key I set up upper limit as say 1%. For LD I am not sure what to put so I put 1 in check limit field.
    Please help me on this issue.
    Thanks,
    Ritesh

    Hi Ritesh,
       The Invoice for the Framework order should be posted same as we post invoice for other doc types.
    The Acct assignment should be entered at the time of invoice only if there is multiple acct assignemnet OR the acct assignment category U-Unknown is selected in the PO.
    The Tolerance limitis LA and LD will help you block the invoice for payment.
    Rajesh Satope

  • Is it possible to spread the commitment on a value limited blanket order?

    Hi - I want to create a value limited blanket order, e.g. over the next 12 months I expect to spend about £12,000 with a service provider.
    I will be billed at monthly intervals and the amount will vary from month to month but it will never be more than 2k in any one month (so it could be say £150 in moth one and £1,500 in month two ).
    At the moment when I look at my planning reports then full £12k commitment appears in the period that is associated with the default delivery date on the PO.
    There are no deliveries as such and GR is not required for this process - I just want to be able to book the invoice as and when it comes in but check the monthly value does not exceed the 2k limit and that overall the annual limit of £12 is not exceeded.
    So is it possible for me to spread the commitment so that it appears as 12 equal instalments on 1k for each period of the PO validity period?
    Ideally I don't want to have to revisit the PO and massage it with each incoming invoice.
    Any thoughts much appreciated.
    Regards.

    Scroll down and you will see how you modify the form action to go to a page.
    http://forums.adobe.com/docs/DOC-2363

  • Problem with material and document date in sales order

    Hi All,
    I am working in ECC 6.0 .I am facing problem with two fields when in enter in to sales order(tcode:va01)
    1.A material comes automatically in line item.
    2.Document date also comes as 27.03.2008 instead of todays date in each order i create.
    I think its not related to configuration.I think its related to some modifications through exits or enhancement points.could someone suggest me a where to check and solve that.
    Your's suggestion is appreciated.

    Hi Sharad,
    Check MV45AFZZ include in se38..It is a user exit for basic validation on sales...We may be able to find some code there (if screen data is predefined by code as mentioned)
    Hope it helps
    Regards
    Byju

  • BOM Valid Date

    Hi,
    While creating BOM due to some human error we took wrong valid date.Now i want to change it.
    Please suggest me the T-code or any customization to change the same.
    "I am online"

    Dear Pawar
    This are the basic IMG settings in order to used the engineering change management
    features.
    x refers to a tick.
    First setup the control data in OS54.
    Revision sections
    Fields :-
    Revision level active            x
    Ext. revision level              x
    Higher revision level            x
    Object Management Record sections
    Fields :-
    Object maintenance               x
    Assign alternative date          x
    Overide value/assignment date sections
    Fields :-
    Only with leading change mst.    x
    Setting the Revision level active is to activate the engineering change management for
    material master.  If you do not want the engineering change management for materials,
    remove the tick.
    With a tick in "Higher revision level", the new revision level has to be always higher
    than the old revision.
    Secondly, setup the external number range in OS53.
    If you use the internal number range, then remove the external number range.
    Third, define the status for the change master records in transaction SM30 - V_T419S.
    Change No.     Chg        Date Chg     Dist. Lock      Description
    Status         Poss
      1             x            x             ' '         Active
      2            ' '          ' '            ' '         Inactive
      3            ' '          ' '             x          Locked
    Fourth, define modification parameters for the BOM in OS27.
    Fields :-
    BOM Validty Maint.               x
    EC Management Active             x
    History Requirement             ' '
    Unit Piece                      PC
    The rest of the fields are blank.
    If the History Requirement is tick, every time during creation of the BOM, SAP will
    prompt your for an ECN number as is compulsory.
    Lastly, define fields selection for routing in OP5A.
    PP task lists: initial screen -> Change number -> Transaction code -> Tick Req.
    Setting the Transaction code fields Required indicate that you have make the ECN number ........
    Hope this will help you one of our friends gave me this
    Pavan

  • Validity date in RFQ

    Hi all,
    Can anyone explain me what is the correct definition of the Validity start date and end date in the RFQ.
    The reason I am asking this question is , If you eneter the start date and end date in the RFQ and create the PO with reference to RFQ, these dates gets copied on to the PO. if the document type of PO is NB then these fields are not visible on PO screen bu in the background the table EKPO is updated with these two filed. And the if you try to eneter the SES after these dates sysetm is not allowing and giving the message as SES date is beyond the valididty date.
    Has any one come across any such issue. Can any one suggest any solution to this.

    Hi Don,
    RFQ means...requesting quotation from a vendor. Validity date start and validity end means the quotation should be send before the validity end date from the vendor. Before getting the quotation and before knowing the rate, how could you make purchase order to that vendor. Before you rise PO, you should maintain the quotation in ME47. As per standard SAP, you should rise po w.r.to quotation.
    Regards,
    Prasath

  • Calculation of dates in Sales order in gATP

    Hi
    Can anybody please tell me how scheduling works for the following dates in sales orders for materials planned in gATP.
    1) Unloading date 2) Delivery date 3) Goods issue date 4) Loading date 5) Material availability date 6) Transportation planning
    My understanding is that gATP gives the MAD date and other remaining dates like transportation planning date, unload date etc are calculated using master data in the calling system eg ECC.
    We are facing an issue in our system where if a material is planned in ECC, it has all dates in the sales order calculated as expected based on ECC master data.
    If the same material is planned in gATP, it simply copies the MAD date to all other dates. So it is not considering the pick/pack , transportationplanning times from the ECC master data.
    Is this standard system behaviour and to avoid this  Do we need to activate Scheduling in gATP along with master data maintenence in APO ?or any user exit plus execution steps is avaialble to by pass APO master data mentaince.
    Appreciate your responses...Regards - Amit

    Amit,
    We are facing an issue in our system where if a material is planned in ECC, it has all dates in the sales order calculated as expected based on ECC master data.
    If the same material is planned in gATP, it simply copies the MAD date to all other dates.
    The system where the parts are planned is irrelevant.  The important issue is the system where the ATP is conducted.
    My understanding is that gATP gives the MAD date and other remaining dates like transportation planning date, unload date etc are calculated using master data in the calling system e.g. ECC.
    I have never seen that statement validated in any SAP documentation.
    From online help:
    SAP R/3 uses the order type to determine whether shipment scheduling or transportation scheduling should be executed.
    If scheduling is activated, SAP R/3 determines a plant for the material for each item. If it is specified in the integration model that the availability check should take place in SAP APO for a material in this plant, transportation and shipment scheduling also takes place in SAP APO.
    Standard SAP APO GATP supplies three different methods for shipment scheduling.  If you are conducting ATP in APO, and you have not configured one of the three scheduling methods, then shipment scheduling does not take place, and the system will react as you have described.  
    Read up on it here
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm70/helpdata/EN/05/f8923945b12c4de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Price Determination (Pricing) Date Control - Purchase Order

    Hi,
    We are exploring the Price Determination (Pricing) Date Control in the Purchase Order.
    Clientu2019s requiring  is, correct me if it is a wrong requirement:
    We have created Tax Codes:
    C2 -  CST 2% valid from 01.04.2010
    C3 -  CST 3% valid from 01.04.2010
    We have created a purchase order with Tax Code C2 - CST 2% on 30.03.2010 as we are in doing back log entries. Since the tax code is valid from 01.04.2010 only , the purchase order is not displaying the Tax Code Value .
    Now we are doing the Goods Receipt on 01.04.2010, the system will not pass the entry for the CST as at time of GR, the System picks up the Tax data from the Purchase Order.
    Now we want that the System should pick up the Data at the Goods Receipt, not from the Purchase Order. Some one advised me to use put GR Date in Pr. Date Cat. Under Item-> Condition Control tab. We are able to view the Pr. Date Cat by changing the Screen Layout of ME21N.
    We want to know what use of the same & under what condition is, we use this.
    Our suggestion:
    1. We are of the view that we should create the Tax Codes with Valid Date from 01.01.2010 (not from 01.04.2010 as currently maintained)
    2. Or since we are doing the back log entry, we should create all the Open Purchase Orders dated 01.04.2010.
    Is this the correct way which we are suggesting?
    Please note that we are dealing with Excise Materials also?
    Please guide.

    Thanks for the reply,
    While testing the same, I also encountered the somewhat same problem.
    You are suggesting that we should change the Tax Code Valid From Date.
    What do mean by the follwoing:
    Pricing date category "GR date" can't be set in PO if price is entered manually (with condition type PBXX). This also means manually entered conditions at Po will not be used.
    Regards,

  • IVL License and validity date

    Hello Experts,
    How do you apply an IVL license to a sales order that was placed before the validity date of the license? 
    The business scenario that I have is a sales order was placed in September, and it required a license.   We applied for the license and recieved it recently and the validatity date is December 2010 thru December 2011.   The license was maintained in the system as such, but the license will not apply to the order since it was placed prior to the stated validity of the license because the document reference date that is being used is the date the order was placed.    Is there a way to account for this without having the sales rep replace the order so the document reference date is inside the validity date of the license recieved from the government?
    Regards,
    annm

    hi
    In your GTS system go to Transaction- /n/SAPSLL/LCD_CHANGE and delete the existing license from the existing order.
    Then go to transaction- /n/SAPSLL/CUHD_MR_EXP and check boxes of "Display Log" and Save Log" and execute it with order number. New license will be assigned to it but make sure you have maintained the correct license determination strategy for it.
    Thanks
    DG

  • Message alert when Invoice date preceds Purchase order date

    Hi all,
    I want to define message alert, when Invoice date precedes Purchase order date. Is there any standard message type is there, If yes please let me know. Otherwise how can i define this, please.
    Thanks
    CS..

    Hi,
    You can take help of your abbaper and enter the validation in the user exit of MIRO thru which Invoices are booked.
    Hope this helps, if yes, please assign points.
    Regards,
    Harish

  • Info Record Validity Dates - Future Period

    Hi Gurus
    can you help
    we have current Purchase Info Recs in place, with pricing condition records that have a validity date that will expire in the next few days
    we have already loaded the next pricing for the next cotnract period with the vendor, but wish to check the accuracy of the data before that pricing condition becomes "current"
    do you know how can we pull the data from the future validity period pricing condition record, so we can validiate this
    i have only found ways to get the current pricing conditions, but not the one for the future period
    please advise
    many thanks

    hi Velu
    we maintain Pricing Condition Type PB00 in ME13
    when i key a Pur Ord for the part, then go to Conditions tab in ME21n, then select the Analysis of the Pricing Condition, it bring up Procedure RM0000
    then Gross Price PB00, then various steps under this
    a number of steps not executed due to requirements not filled etc, being Contracts, outline agreements, Plant Infor Rec Order Unit, then Material Info Rec (Plant Specific)  A017, then Material Info Rec table A018 with various field names
    For Access Sequence step Mat Info Rec (Plant Specific)  it does say No condition record was found for this condition using the document data.
    any thoughts
    If we cannot resolve i shall leave it for now, and review on the day it becomes current
    many thanks

  • PO Validity Date

    Hello
    The requirment is once the PO validity date is over, then system should not allow any GR or IV against the PO.
    Is their any std SAP message which can control this.
    Regards
    Niti Narayan

    Hi,
    To control this.......you an use latest GR date in delivery tab
    To prevent goods from being accepted in the case of delayed delivery, youmust specify the latest possible goods receipt date for the item in the purchase order. This field is in the item detail data on the Delivery tab page. You also have to set
    message 163, Last possible delivery date was... (work area M7), as a warning or error message in Customizing.
    If you have set the message as an error message for delayed delivery, you can post  the delivered goods to the GR blocked stock and then post a return delivery from the GR blocked stock.
    Hope Help U !
    Regards,
    Pardeep Malik

  • GATP - Issue with substitution rules with validity dates

    Hi,
    We are using GATP with RBA. Our condition table has plant as a field.
    We are planning to have a substitution procedure (rules) defined at plant level.
    Our rule control for product substitution list is "Start from top of list"
    The issue we are facing is explained below.
    The first item in the substitution procedure (rule) cannot have validity dates.
    So it will always be balnk. And validity dates can be maintained for other items in the procedure (rule).
    What happens in our scenario is when there is a requirement on an item in the substitution procedure (rule) which has  a validity date, the first item in the procedure (which can never have validity dates) is never considerd for substituions.
    If I remove the validity dates, then the first item in the procedure (rule) is considered for substitutions.
    We find this strange and against our business requirement. We want the first item in the procedure (rule) to be considered for substitution ireespective of the validity date for the requested product.
    It would be great if you could suggest a method to achieve this.
    Thanks & regards,
    Arvind.S

    Hi Mohan,
    Thanks for the response.
    We are using back order processing (BOP) for allocation.
    We observed that the first item was not getting considered for substitution in the BOP results and also in product view after the BOP run. No stock of that item was allocated for the order taken up in the BOP run.
    However, we tried rule evaluation also. It shows the first item also, but in actual allocation the issue exists.
    We are not using "start immediately" in check instructions.
    Thanks & regards,
    Ashok

Maybe you are looking for