Valuation method for Reasult Analysis

Dear PS experts,
Normally what is the valuation method we are using in india. I assueme 03 is the correct valuation method for calculating wip in india. Is there any other method can u explain.
Regards

Hi,
It depends also on the following points:
1.If you are using Milestone Billing or Partial Billing use Method 01,02 or 03.
2.If you using RRB then go for method 14 or method 15.
3.If you want to calculate RA on the basis of Progress then use progress bases method.
Muzamil

Similar Messages

Differance amoung the Valuation Methods for Result Analysis

Dear All,
In SAP Product Cost Controlling ther are 3 types of Cosings
1. Production Cost by Order
Path:- Production Cost by Order ---> Period end Closing ->WIP->Defind Valuation Method for( Actual Cost)
2. Production Cost By Period
Path:- Production Cost by Period ---> Period end Closing ->WIP->Defind Valuation Method for ( Target Cost )
3. Production Cost by Sales Order
Path :- Production Cost by Sales Order ---> Period end Closing --->Defind Valuation Method for Result Analysis.
Note: Here the point is Valuation Methods ( 1 to 17 ) availabel in Production Cost by Sales Order only. The Valution Method is very important to Calculate WIP. Different Countries follows different methods, but in the By Order and By Period we can get these Valuation Methods. What would be the reasno behind this.
Regards

Dear All,
Any one have any ieda

Valuation Method for Indian Payroll

Hi,
Can any one let me know the valuation method available in Indian Payroll.
As per my knowledge is concern I Know there are 4 valuations methods are there.
Can any one just provide me with name's of four valuation method.
Thanks in Advance
Irfan Hussain

HAi..
INVAL - Indirect Evaluation Module Variant for India
There are four module variants for INVAL:
1. A - This calculates the value of the wage type as a fixed amount.
2. B - This calculates the amount as a percentage of a base wage type added to a fixed amount. More than one such amount, with same or different percentage of the base wage type, can be calculated for an INVAL wage type. In this case, the amount that will be Indirectly Evaluated will be the sum of all such calculated amounts, added to a fixed amount. For example, for the wage type M230, the different INVAL B amounts are
a) 10% of MB10
b) 30% of M220
c) Fixed amount of Rs.1000
In this case, the INVAL amount for the wage type M230 will be the sum of a, b and c.
3. C - This calculates the amount as a percentage of a base wage type subject to a maximum limit. More than one such amount, with same or different percentage of the base wage type, can be calculated for an INVAL wage type. In this case, the amount that will be Indirectly Evaluated will be the sum of all such calculated amounts, subject to a maximum limit. For example, for the wage type M230, the different INVAL C amounts are
a) 10% of MB10
b) 30% of M220
c) Limit of Rs.5000
In this case, the INVAL amount for the wage type M230 will be the sum of a and b subject to a maximum of c.
4. D - This calculates the amount as one or any combination of the following INVAL Module variants based on Basic salary slabs:
a) Fixed amount
b) Percentage of a base wage type added to a fixed amount
c) Percentage of a base wage type subject to a maximum limit
In the SAP system, INVAL D can be configured as only INVAL B or C. Once the percentage of the base wage type is calculated, the result is multiplied with a factor. This resultant amount is then added to fixed amount or is compared with a maximum limit. For example, the INVAL module variant for the wage type M210, for an employee who falls in the Basic Salary slab of Rs.10,000 - 12,000, is INVAL C. The INVAL amounts are:
a) 10% of MB10
b) 30% of M220
c) Multiplication factor of 50%
d) Limit of Rs.7000
In this case, the INVAL amount for M210 for the employee is the sum of a and b, multiplied by c and the result is subject to a maximum of d.
If you want to configure the wage type as a fixed amount for a particular slab, the wage type is configured as INVAL B. In this case, the percentage of the base wage type is multiplied with the factor of 0% and then the fixed amount added to the result. For example, the INVAL module variant for the wage type M230, for an employee who falls in the Basic Salary slab of Rs.15,000 - 25,000, is INVAL B. The INVAL amounts are:
a) 100% of MB10
b) Multiplication factor of 0%
c) Fixed amount of Rs.5000
In this case, the INVAL amount for M230 for the employee is the value of a, multiplied by b and the result added to c. In this case, the INVAL amount will be the fixed amount of Rs.5000.
From IMG doc...

Results analysis: Valuation method 15 (RRB)

Hi experts,
Can i have a detailed example for posting lines for RA valuation method :
15 - Derive revenues from resource-related billing of dynamic line items
warm regards
ramSiva

Hai Mikhail
As u mentioned u set the RA method for POC3 in OKG3.
Assuming maintained in OKG3 - the status control ,profit Basis,Valuation Level and its Minimum Values.
Is the RA version been maintained in OKG2 ?
In OKG2 - need to maintain the RA version with respect to the Controlling Area like 0 or 1.
Is OKG8 has been maintained on the Posting Rules - means where the RA version should have the corrsponding Profit & loss account number and Balance sheet account number.
Kindly check and verify according to the relevant RA used/picked using OKG1 in Config - OKG2(maintain RA versions), OKG3(valuation methods for RA), Define Line ID's , OKG5 ( Assignment of Cost elements for WIP and RA) , OKG4( update of WIP calculation and RA) , OKG8 ( Posting rules in WIP and RA) .
If all these maintained u will definetelu get the KKA2 result.
ENJOY SAP PS
Regards
PP

Data Import error - Valuation Method (ODBC -1029)

Hello all, first post on the SCN. I did some search for similar problems, but nothing seemed to help here.
We are using Business One, two different companies and databases. We were at the time of the year to update the price list, so we used the Administration -> Data Import/Export -> Data Import -> Import from Excel.
One company (US only) imports perfectly, but the other database (Canada + US) gives me the following error message on 91 / 1036 entries.
Row Number xxx : [Items - Valuation Method] , 'Field cannot be updated (ODBC -1029)
Since the errors only appears on one of the two databases, I ruled out that the excel sheet we used to be the problem.
The excel sheet only has 4 columns : The item identification, the price list that it needs to update, the price, and the currency (USD or $ for us).
Neither of the two companies use any valuation method. In fact, neither companies have the field at all in Item Master Data, and its grayed out in the Company Details.
We also made a dump of the entire item database, and compared what items were imported successfully and those that generated the error, and while the column Valuation Method either had nothing or A, there was no pattern to it. Some errors had nothing, some had A in it.
I checked for any other differences between items that were imported and the ones with error, and cannot see any visible differences, so all I can think here is that its either an invisible setting when the item was created, or there's some character that is creating a fault somewhere (like an empty space).
One of the topics found on this error message (ODBC -1029) said that we might need to request a script to fix the database, but that topic was back in 2006, I'm not sure if it still applies, 8 years later.
Essentially I ran out of things to try on my end. Now I can only ask to the experts.
Thank you for your time!

The company that has troubles importing does not allow us to change the Valuation Method for each item. The field is missing entirely from the Item Master Data. I included a screenshot.
The field is grayed out in the Company Details, but its set as Moving Average. The other company uses Moving Average by default as well, from the looks of it (the field does appear in Item Master Data, but its grayed out).
We used the same excel sheet to import data in both companies, just need to figure out why its 100% on one side and not on the other side.
Just to be a bit more clear, we cannot select or visualize the Valuation Method on the items that are not getting imported. Its invisible.
When we exported the full list of items, there was no pattern between the items that are not imported and those that are imported properly.
To be clear, the Valuation Method for :
Items that are imported properly are A or blank.
Items that are not imported and generate an error are A or blank.
There is no logic between those that work and those that do not, which is why I can't figure it out on my own.
Thank you!

Change valuation method from moving average to FIFO

We have incorrectly given valuation method for our raw materials to moving average instead of FIFO. Now, we have a lot of transactions and cannot change the method after a transaction is done for any item. I want to know if this solution will work:
1. create new database with item and business master data, chart of accounts, item groups as before
2. change valuation method of all items
3. Import GRPO, Excise and A/P invoices from old database
Does step 3 create its own JEs?? If it does, then my problem will be solved.

Hi Krishna,
this is the SAP Business One Forum in German. Please post your threads in English to the forum here:
SAP Business One Application
All the best,
kerstin

How to use more than one indirect valuation module for the same wage type

Is it possible and how to use the u201CIndirect valuation based on master data: ICOMPu201D configuration to default the NUMBER and at the SAME TIME to use u201CDefine valuation of base wage types usingu201D to default the AMOUNT from one/two WTs ?

You can use the the same wage type for both number and amount but you can't assign 2 indirect valuation method for the same wage type at 1 time. I would rather suggest you to go for some customer specific indirect valuation instead of the standard one. You can use BAdI HR_INDVAL for the same.

Result Analysis Valuation Method 3

Hi PS Experts,
The building block document on Profit Realization 'I58_BB_ConfigGuide_EN_DE' says that as per IAS 11 and 18, we need to configure Result Analysis Valuation Method 3 only which is cost based. Is it right and whether you are all having this valuation method in your SAP system where IFRS standards are applicable.
Then, in addition to this cost based Revenue Recognition through this valuation method 3, we would like to input realistic POC(Engineer's certificate) into the system. Whether it is possible and if so, how and what other valuation method we need to use with or with changes to a particular valuation method. Appreciate your valuable inputs on this.
Regards!

Hello,
Cost based POC i.e Method 3 is compliant with IFRS requirements. Other methods also are so.
The choice of RA method depends on value/risk/duration/revenue plan of the project. We use this method for high value projects running for a long time where there is a need to recognise revenue before actual billing.
Completed contract method is also used and very much in accordance with accouning principles.
For POC calculated through progress determination- say Engineer's certificate- you can use method 7.
Thanks,

Create versions for valuation methods

In creating versions for valuation method ,I am getting error"View cluster is already open. Go Back with F3
Message no. SV851" and "inconsistency between CoCo."

I got the same error when configuring valuation method under controlling module.

RA with Valuation Method 7 with POC %ages

Hi,
Highly appreciated, if you can detail the steps involved in carrying out RA with Valuation Method 7 with progressive value analysis. Here, we can give a percentage of POC into the system as certified by the Engineers unlike Valuation method 3 where the POC is calculated on the basis of actual costs incurred.
In the case of valuation method 3, only revenue is analysed by the system with reference to the POC and necessary entries are posted as Revenue surplus or Revenue in excess of billings. Whereas in the case of valuation method 7, both the revenue and costs are analysed and necessary provisions are made both for revenue and costs.
Regards,
Ashok Singh

hi
check your settings for accounting documents postings

Change of Valuation Method

Dear All
Is it possible to Change the valuation method from FIFO to LIFO or Moving Average Price, when the Stocks are available in factory

Standard to MAP and vice versa are very well explained in the document provided by Ramana on page 31. Thanks Ramana!
As far as the FIFO and LIFO valuation are concerned, the system continues to maintain in standard or MAP, as setup by the price control indicator, S or V. What the system does is, at the period end, finds what would be the value of the closing stock, if FIFO or LIFO is method is followed. It is only relevant to valuation of closing inventory. It is for information purpose, but still if you want to value the inventory on FIFO or LIFO basis, then you can set up the update indicator. If it is done so, then the value proposed by LIFO/FIFO analysis is updated, as if it were a price change.
In OMWE you can parallely maintain both LIFO and FIFO active.

Valuated stock for a certain period

Hi all,
Using transaction MC.9 (Material Analysis: Stock), you can search for a material for a certain period (ea. 04.2007). The outcome gives you the Valuated Stock for that period.
In which table is this Valuated stock stored?
How can I fetch this Valuated Stock (through table, BAPI, ...?
Many thanks in advance.

Hi,
Reading data from MBEWH is tricky since as you correctly pointed out there may not be any record in MBEWH for a particular period.The logic for creating a record in MBEWH is for first relevent entry in the current month create a history record in MBEWH i.e. e.g. if there is a say GIR or any stock movement today & if this happens to be the first entry for materialValuation area then it will create a record in MBEWH for the previous period i.e. 2008/03. Now suppose there is no movement at all say for the period 2008/04 & say 2008/05 materialValuation area in that case as per the above mentioned logic for the first record of the materialVal area for the period 2008/06 it will write a record for 2008/05 but there will be no record for the period 2008/04.so to get the currect valuated stock get all records for materialval area into an internal table where
period i.e YYYYMM is GE period under consideration. Then sort the internal table on matnrbwkeybwtarlfgjalfmon. Then loop at the internal table & if you hit the first record pick up the stock i.e the stock you are interested in & exit from the loop. However if no record is found in the internal table get the details directly from MBEW. & that's it. You may refer to SAP help for the same. (search for MBEWH)
I hope this helps,
Regards,
Raju Chitale

JE Passed in case of Standard valuation method in 2007B

Dear All,
I am bit confused---
The scenario is i have done one transaction for A/P invoice.The JE passed in case of A/P invoice & in case of item having valuation method standard & procurement method make is hitting material variance account instead of hitting inventory account since the tax say cst is inventoried.This issue is occurring only in case of standard valuation method.In case of other valuation method the accounting entry is correct, so what might be reasons behind it.
Also, if anyone could provide me sap portal link which will help me out to identify the changes which took place in different PL's.
Regards-
Mona.

Hi Mona ,
The quick thing is to check :
1. What is the standard price of the item
2. Is your GRPO price is difference than AP invoice
Everytime you purchase it will check against your standard price and if it is different it his variance account .
Hope this helps
Bishal

I want a report for Report analysis....

i want a report for Report analysis....
the require ment is like below...
Selection
From Date
To date
Set Up Data
Bank Accounts           FromTo
Billing Accounts         FromTo
% Operations % Management % Research & Development
Above % applies on Billed Amount.
Report Need to be displayed
SBU/Dept     OB Bank     Receipts     Payments     Balance     Accrued OB on Billing     Accrued on Billing     Balance
SBU1
SBU2
SBU3
SBU4
SBU5
SBU6
SBU7
SBU8

Hi Sam
As I said, you can tag variance of FG upto some extent to the COGS of FG...
Also note that, w/o ML, variance is disposed off in the month of mfg, where as COGS comes in the month of sale... For eg: You mfr 100 Kgs @ Actual cost of 120, where as your std cost is 100... You sell 50 kgs in Month 1 and 50 kg in month 2
In Month 1
COGS = 50 (@ std cost)
Variance = 20
In Month 2
COGS = 50
Variance = 0
Variance analysis w/o ML is always limited.. At best what you can do is draw your COPA reports on YTD (Year To Date) basis... Assuming that your closing and opening stock is more or less the same, your variance related to FG can now be analysed with COGS and revenues....
Also, if your prod order for FG is tagged to sale order on account of MTO scenario, your COPA doc for variance will have customer info as well
With ML in place
Variance of SFG can be rolled upto FG... i.e. Say, variance in SFG is 20 USD... Std cost of FG is 125 USD... When you roll up the variance to FG, your FG valuation will become 145 USD....
Also, if part of the FG is sold off, then prorata variance will go to Inventory and the rest can be taken to COGS.. i.e. not only FG, you can also revaluate your COGS with ML...
Regards
Ajay M

Valuation Methods - foreign currency valuation

Hello
I am trying to understand the concept of different valuation methods. could you explain using examples please ?
Say for instance, a goods receipt is raised in USD for 100USD on 2 Jan 2009 and local currency is EUR. Exchange rate is 1EUR : 1,5USD. On 4 Jan 2009 invoice received at rate of 1EUR : 1,6USD.
What are the implications of the options lowest value principle, strict lowest value principle, always valuate and revalue for such a transaction?
tks

Those are different ways of valuating your Foreign Currency Operations depending or the country regulations:
1- Lowest value principle means that the Valuation will be posted only if it is giving a negative result.
2- Strict lowest value principle will be post valuation only if two conditions happened:
A - The valuation is negative
B - The new valuation has a greater devaluation and/or a greater revaluation for credit entries than the previous valuation
3 - Always Valuate: No matter if it is possitive or negative, the valuation will be posted.
4 - Revalue only: The opposite of the first one, valuation is only posted when possitve.
5 -Reset Valuation Run: In this case open items are valuated at the acquisition price. This way the valuation difference is set to zero. This is useful to reset previous valuations
Regards,
Fede

Valuation method for Reasult Analysis

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for