Results analysis: Valuation method 15 (RRB)

Hi experts,
Can i have a detailed example for posting lines for RA valuation method :
15 - Derive revenues from resource-related billing of dynamic line items
warm regards
ramSiva

Hai Mikhail
As u mentioned u set the RA method for POC3 in OKG3.
Assuming maintained in OKG3 - the status control ,profit Basis,Valuation Level and its Minimum Values.
Is the RA version been maintained in  OKG2 ?
In OKG2 - need to maintain the RA version with respect to the Controlling Area like 0 or 1.
Is OKG8 has been maintained on the Posting Rules - means where the RA version should have the corrsponding Profit & loss account number and Balance sheet account number.
Kindly check and verify according to the relevant RA used/picked using OKG1 in Config - OKG2(maintain RA versions), OKG3(valuation methods for RA), Define Line ID's , OKG5 ( Assignment of Cost elements for WIP and RA) , OKG4( update of WIP calculation and RA) , OKG8 ( Posting rules in WIP and RA) .
If all these maintained u will definetelu get the KKA2 result.
ENJOY SAP PS
Regards
PP

Similar Messages

  • Result Analysis Valuation Method 3

    Hi PS Experts,
    The building block document on Profit Realization 'I58_BB_ConfigGuide_EN_DE' says that as per IAS 11 and 18, we need to configure Result Analysis Valuation Method 3 only which is cost based. Is it right and whether you are all having this valuation method in your SAP system where IFRS standards are applicable.
    Then, in addition to this cost based Revenue Recognition through this valuation method 3, we would like to input realistic POC(Engineer's certificate) into the system. Whether it is possible and if so, how and what other valuation method we need to use with or with changes to a particular valuation method. Appreciate your valuable inputs on this.
    Regards!

    Hello,
    Cost based POC i.e Method 3 is compliant with IFRS requirements. Other methods also are so.
    The choice of RA method depends on value/risk/duration/revenue plan of the project. We use this method for high value projects running for a long time where there is a need to recognise revenue before actual billing.
    Completed contract method is also used and very much in accordance with accouning principles.
    For POC calculated through progress determination- say Engineer's certificate- you can use method 7.
    Thanks,

  • Problem while running KKA2 (result analysis) RA method 07(POC)

    Hi All,
    In our project we are using RA method( cost based method -07) when i have the planning cost  (material and labour hrs) in the project. Here , issue what i am facing is till there is only showing planned material cost of the project , in KKA2 i can see the planned cost, but I am not able to see planned hours in my result analaysis kka2 if i refer any PS reports i can see the plan cost there. but i can see plan revenue as well .
    I am confused with this kind of system behaviour. Kindly suggest me what shall i do to overcome this. In our scenario in valuation method i am ausing over all plan  : E  and over run : A
    Thanks

    Hello
    Please note the description from the Overview for this SCN Space:
    Official SAP Help Portal Community. Find comments on SAP product documentation (such as SAP Application Help, also known as SAP Library), and read best practices shared by the community.
    Based do the above, I believe you posted your query into the incorrect SCN Space. Please use the Forum Finder for the New SCN document to find your product and post into that SCN Space.
    Also  seeing as you did not provide any product information, I would also highly recommend reading the SCN Rules of Engagement.
    With best regards,
    - Ludek

  • What is Importance of Financial Accounting in Result Analysis

    hi sap kings........
    please give me details of result analysis in financial accounting.

    Hi,
    Results analysis valuates the relationship between the costs and a measure of the order's progress towards completion, such as the revenue or the quantity produced.
    Eg:
    If the measure of an order's progress is the actual revenue, the cost of sales approriate for that revenue is calculated. The revenue, cost of sales, and reserves for imminent loss (if calculated) represent the profit on the order for the period, and are settled to Profitability Analysis.
    The calculated cost of sales is compared with the actual costs, and either work in process or reserves for unrealized costs are created for the difference. Postings are made for these values in <b>Financial Accounting.</b>
    Regards,
    Senthilkumar SD

  • Differance amoung the Valuation Methods for Result Analysis

    Dear All,
    In SAP Product Cost Controlling ther are 3 types of Cosings
    1. Production Cost by Order
    Path:- Production Cost by Order ---> Period end Closing ->WIP->Defind Valuation Method for( Actual Cost)
    2. Production Cost By Period
    Path:- Production Cost by Period ---> Period end Closing ->WIP->Defind Valuation Method for ( Target Cost )
    3. Production Cost by Sales Order
    Path :- Production Cost by Sales Order ---> Period end Closing --->Defind Valuation Method for Result Analysis.
    Note:  Here the point is Valuation Methods ( 1 to 17 ) availabel in Production Cost by Sales Order only.  The Valution Method is very important to Calculate WIP.  Different Countries follows different methods, but in the By Order and By Period we can get these Valuation Methods.  What would be the reasno behind this.  
    Regards

    Dear All,
    Any one have any ieda

  • Result Analysis method 03 Cost Proportional POC

    Hi,
    I am going to use Result analysi 03 Cost Proportional POC. Please guide me how the accounting entries will
    flow in  this method and formulas for this method.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Srilakshmi

    Hi,
    In your RA key definition, in column, Valuation...
    change valuation basis to J - Cumulative Actual Costs, Cumulative Actual Revenues

  • Result analysis method

    hi dear,the expert mode is active for one RA key,then how can i know the original result analysis method used in this key?because i can not display view of "simplified maintenance of valuation method" after expert mode used

    Hi,
    In your RA key definition, in column, Valuation...
    change valuation basis to J - Cumulative Actual Costs, Cumulative Actual Revenues

  • Results analysis for POC method with statistical cost element

    Hi,
    We are testing ETO (engineering-to-order) scenario With valuated
    project stock and cost based POC RA method.
    Inventory is updated during external procurement and we have used
    statistical cost elements (Cost element category - 90) for inventory G/L.We want to use a
    Result analysis method which considers this statistical cost elements
    for calculating POC.For this purpose we have implemented SAP Notes
    616960, 616869 and 78420.
    In short, as per SAP note 616869, we created a customer enhancement
    project for customer enhancement 5 of the results analysis (see Note
    H78420). We copied the source code for customer enhancement 5 of the
    correction instructions of note 616869 and then implemented SAP note
    616960 to read the statistical actual costs.
    Then we included the statistical cost as actual costs - Category K in
    OKG4.
    The system is doing POC and revenue in excess of billing calculation
    correctly after taking into consideration the posted statistical cost.
    During settlement of RA (CJ88), system is not giving effect to
    inventory value. On settlement of RA, revenue should be recognized but
    at the sametime the inventory represented by statistical posting should
    be consumed(COS). The system should post a P&L posting which reduces
    the inventory (representing statistical cost) and updates the actual
    costs on settlement.
    In our example, Statistical actual
    posting is of USD 57150, planned revenue USD 100000 and POC is 70.27%.
    Revenue in excess of billing comes to USD 70265.60. Recognisation of
    revenue of USD 70265.60 is not correct as actual consumption is yet to
    happen. The correct posting in FI should be revenue of USD 70265.60
    along with COS of USD 57150.
    Please suggest why on settlement the system is not posting the COS
    along with revenue recognised?
    Thanks,
    BK

    Hi Bijay,
    We are in a similar situation in one project.  Did you get any solution to the problem you posted here? If you can share it, please.
    Regards,
    Gireesh

  • Valuation method for Reasult Analysis

    Dear PS experts,
    Normally what is the valuation method we are using in india.  I assueme 03 is the correct valuation method for calculating wip in india.  Is there any other method can u explain.
    Regards

    Hi,
    It depends also on the following points:
    1.If you are using Milestone Billing or Partial Billing use Method 01,02 or 03.
    2.If you using RRB then go for method 14 or method 15.
    3.If you want to calculate RA on the basis of Progress then use progress bases method.
    Muzamil

  • Quantity base POC method of result analysis

    hello all,
    We are trying to create the result analysis key with quantity based POC method for Projects. we are choosing the Profit basis as E,K,M but we are getting the error ' Profit basis is only used for sales order.
    Can anybody help resolving the issue?
    Regards,
    sudhir

    RamSiva,
    I see that you've got the calculated COGS equal to the actual cost.  I would have thought that for quantity based POC the calculated cost should be equal to POC x C(p).  So if that's the case, I think the postings should be as follows:
    Debit Revenue for 36,000
    Credit Reserve for Revenue surplus for 36,000
    Since I don't know what the planned cost were I don't know what the correct signs are for COGS adjustment;
    Debit / Credit (Expense)
    Debit / Credit (Capitalized cost or reserve for unrealized cost, depending on the sign)
    If R(a) less than R(c) then:
    Credit Revenue
    Debit Revenue in excessive of billings
    thanks,

  • Which Results Analysis Method is good for LOSS Projects?

    Dear Experts,
    Our client have Loss projects scenario.
    for Eg. Plan Revenue_: 100,
    Plan Cost__________: 120
    Loss______________: = -20
    Loss 20 should post in accounts at first period end closing time itself for that which Results Analysis Method can help me for it. Plz give me your valuable solution soon.
    Thanks
    Bhagirath

    Hi,
    which RA Method you are using.
    If you are using method 01 then  in OKG8,Choose RA Cat RIML(Reserves for Imminent loss) or if you are using 03 method then use POCL .Assign the GL accounts againt these RA cat one B/S Account and one P&L (not a Cost element).
    Muzamil

  • Result Analysis:

    What is the difference between the Cost element data in the result analysis where we maintian the cost elements Gl accounts in RESULT analysis version with the G/l accounts or cost elements in the Line ID updating.
    We maintain both these G/l accounts where would the posting of the result analysis happen.

    Hi,
    In the Line ID you need to maintain the GL Account range and posting rules for FI you need to maitain GL Accounts for respective Valuation methods.
    S.Subbiah.

  • Change Result analysis key in WBS element

    Hi Friends,
    Is it possible to change result analysis key in WBS element?
    Any thoughts/suggestions would be welcome.
    Regards,
    Soumya

    Hi Soumya ,
    Changing an RA Key in a WBS Element is easy and it just any normal activity which one can do. But the important thing is that you will have to look at the potential repurcussions which will arise because of changing the RA Key. As long as both the RA keys have the same valuation method and other relevant settings , changing would be OK. If the Valuation methods are different then there would be inconsistencies in Financial Accounting as the computation of revenues / cost of sales would be differing.
    Excercise due caution .
    Regards,
    Venkat.

  • OKG3 - Create a new valuation method

    Hi All!
    Im trying to create a new valuation method by OKG3 without "Result analysis method" and "Cancel
    Inventory/Reserves with Status" fields filled out. I need these fields in blank but these fields are mandatory.
    Even I change to expert mode its necessary fill out these fields.
    Any idea to resolve this issue? Is it necessary to do any previous configuration?
    Best regards,
    Ricardo Sanerip

    Hi,
    Please go through this building blocks in order to understand need configuration steps
    http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/600/BBLibrary_start.htm
    Best regards
    Medha

  • Result Analysis Settlement - Posting to FI

    Hi all
    I am configuring Result analysis related configuration to post WIP values to FI on period basis. I did following nodes configuration
    1.  Create Result Analysis Keys
    2.  Define Result Analysis Versions
    3.  Define Valuation Methods for Result Analysis
    4.  Define LIne ID
    5.  Define Assignment for Result Analysis
    6.  Define update for Result Analsysis
    7.  Define posting rules for Settlement to Finanacial Accounting
    We have RA connection with Projects
    After making all above configurations when we are performing KKA2 and CJ88, NO FI documents are getting posted and we are repeatedly getting message as there is no "Accrual" values. 
    We even not getting WIP values at KKA2, though we have eligble values at Project.
    we need to fix that at high priority...
    your inputs are highly appreciated..
    Kindly let me know, if any further clarifications required on this.
    best regards,
    S. Habib Pasha.

    Hi ,
    Based up on the above discussion did you executed any standard cost and revenue reports against the relevant WBS elements and verified that costs and revenue are flowing properly to the project ?
    In the RA are you able to see the WIP Values,Planned values and Actual values for COST and REVENUE ?
    And what are the parameters you maintained in  Settelement Profile ?
    Thanks,
    Sai.

Maybe you are looking for