Variance between G/L and audit report incase of Landed cost

Hi,
Scenario
GRPO : 17000 qty dated 01.09.09
Goods issue :15000 qty 05.09.09
Landed cost: 17000Qty dated 10.09.09
when we post the landed cost the system will post the journal entry based on total qty 17000.
But if i see the audit report,value is shown for only 2000qty and rest is posted to price difference account.
In this case how is it possible to reconcile the G/L and the audit report?
Please help
thanks
Md.nazeer Shaikh

Hi,
Thanks for the replies.
Yes this is the first time i am experiencing these results.
SAP 2005B PL:15
Thanks
Md.nazeer Shaikh

Similar Messages

Variance between Material Ledger and General Ledger of

There is again a variance between Material Ledger and General Ledger of
7.026,64 (Tcode MB5L) as it was already in $$100036500(G/L).
The strange thing is, that there is only a difference in the GL Account
Balance report (FS10N) for S240077000(G/L ). In the Line Item report (FBL3N)
all documents are available. This issue impacts at least the Balance
carry forward negativ at the year end, because the system will forward
the the amount of the balance for S240077000, which is now 7.026,64 to
less.
Ther first investigations results:
- all Material- and FI documents are available.
- the variances in June refer to FI-documnets 4900015286 and 4900015293.
- the documents, e.g. 4900015292 and 4900015287, are correct and was
posted at the same day by the same user and with the same transaction
MI07.
- there are no differences for the posted materials identificable from
the other materials

Material Ledger/Actual costing MLAC
MLAC is used where the FG cost varies every month due to external procurement variation.
Ex: Jan 2011
FG cost of manufcature internally = 100
FG cost of procurement externally = 120 ( Company procures due to capacity constraint)
FG Standard price at the end of month = 110...This is standard price of FG
Due to heavy fluctuations in the month of February 2011 in procurement...
Ex: Feb 2011
FG cost of manufcature internally = 140
FG cost of procurement externally = 460 ( Company procures due to capacity constraint)
FG Standard price at the end of month = 300...This is standard price of FG.
The variance is very high in Feb 2011 and company want to absorb this variance in Feb 2011 iteslef hence they will use MLAC.
So if the variance is within reasonable limits company usually do not follow MLAC.
Where as if the variance is very high company usually follow MLAC.
In Pharma Industry usually the variance is very high on month to month basis hence they follow MLAC.
Where as in Industrial Mahcineery Manufacturing Company the variance is with in reasonable limits hence they do not follow MLAC. Ofcourse they can use MLAC as well.
Srinivas

What is difference between interactive list and interactive reports?

what is difference between interactive list and interactive reports?

hi check this..
interactive report/list means any input(double click or single click or user command ) on the screen will results a new screen with the corresponding fields....this is upto 20 levels only check this..
report .
start-of-selection.
write:/ 'this is the source list'.
at line-selection .
if sy-lsind = 1 .
write:/ ' this is the 1st list'.
elseif.
if sy-lsind = 2 .
write:/ ' this is the 2 list'.
if sy-lsind = 3 .
write:/ ' this is the 3 list'.
if sy-lsind = 4 .
write:/ ' this is the 4 list'.
if sy-lsind = 5 .
write:/ ' this is the 5 list'.
if sy-lsind = 6 .
write:/ ' this is the 6 list'.
if sy-lsind = 7 .
write:/ ' this is the 7 list'.
if sy-lsind = 8.
write:/ ' this is the 8 list'.
if sy-lsind = 9 .
write:/ ' this is the 9 list'.
if sy-lsind = 10 .
write:/ ' this is the 10 list'.
endif.
regards,
venkat

Finance and Controlling report in combination with Cost center, GL account, Internal Order

Hi Members,
Finance and Controlling report in combination with Cost center, GL account, Internal Order.
Please provide any slandered report in all 3 dimension.
Thanks
Dileep Kumar

Search this query in FI Controlling forum am sure you will get useful results there.
This kind of reports related to Controlling are usually created using Report Writer tool.
In fact majority of reports in Controlling component is created using Report Writer only.

Discrepancy between Balance sheet and Aging report

HI Experts,
I have a client who run the AR Aging and Balance sheet monthly for as their month end procedures.
They have found the following:
When the Balance Sheet and Aging report is run on the same day this shows the same on the Accounts Receivable and the Aging report.
When the Aging is run a few days after the month end, and the Aging Date is selected as 05/01/2010, the Posting Date untill is also 05/01/2010, the Balance Sheet To date is 05/01/2010 I get discrepancies between the 2 amounts.
I looked for documents with later Posting/Document dates but could not find any in the aging report.
Any help would be welcome.
Marli

Hi Marli,
You may check these threads:
Re: Mismatch in Accounts Receivable Balance and A/R Aging Balance due
Re: customer aging query - show balance as of a specific date
Thanks,
Gordon

Difference between google analytics and bc report?

When I compare GA and BC, BC shows me more than double number of visitors and pageviews than google.
For example June:
Visitors/Pageviews
BC: 1386/4087
GA: 492/1647
Thats so much difference, that I don't know which system I should trust. How can I interpret this data and how many visitors are visiting my site in reality?

Hi,
Our analytics work fundamentally differently like other services (Google, etc) so there can be discrepancies in the data between them.
For example, Google Analytics counts a page visit as a 30 minute session. If the person is inactive for 31 minutes and then clicks again, it counts as 2 visits.
As for BC individual visits are given a 1 hour session before they time out and are counted as a new visitor. Unique visitors are kept unique via a cookie for up to 1 year.
Every time a user interacts with the site this is refreshed (so if you view a page once and then 30 minutes later, the timeout would not occur until 1hr 30 min after you viewed the page the first time).
Google relies on JavaScript to record usage whilst BC does it each time it serves content. We use a number of methodologies to detect bots including user-agent string, repetitive hits from same IP or location amongst others. There's the reason why the numbers are different and cannot be compared. You can compare the results provided either by Business Catalyst for a long period or by Google Analytics, but not one method with the other.
Whilst there may be differences in the exact number of reported visits (as Google Analytics and BC have different ‘count’ processes and Bot handling mechanism’s) the main use for visitor statistics should be to view trends over time, which you should find are similar between GA and BC reporting.
If needing us to look into your report further please log a ticket and we'll advise.
Hope this helps!
-Sidney

What is the speed/performance comparison between Soundbooth CS5 and Audition CS6?

Obviously, I don't need to be convinced about the difference. However, in demonstrating and working with Audition I didn't take a note of these speed differences. Does anyone have this information for business justification reasons?
I am looking for the speed of a sound file (*.wav, approximately 1-5minutes in length) rendering in Soundbooth CS5 and Audition CS6 as well as a comparison of doing 10 files (approximately 1-5 minutes in length each) in Soundbooth and in Audition CS6 (using batch processing) to *.mp3 with basic processes applied. Basic processes that I am checking are Noise Reduction, Trimming front and end silences, Normalization, and rendering to *.mp3 (from *.wav). If anyone can do this for me, that would be awesome!!

travis_smith_ wrote:
Hello _durin_, yes all those are great arguments that I've already included; however, some people like to use accurate measures/times/processes...they want numbers.
So, do you (or anyone else) happen to know the render engine speed of 1 file in Soundbooth v. 1 file in Audition?
What Durin hasn't perhaps made quite clear is that you'd have to do this on just one machine to come up with any comparisons at all - and if that machine isn't identical to yours, then it's going to be meaningless anyway; some of the processes (like NR) will vary considerably between two different machines, even running the same software. There is no way on earth that this would be an accurate comparison, and I don't think it would convince anybody who actually understood what was at issue. This is the politest way of saying that it's not going to happen... and if Durin, as Audition's Product Owner, isn't prepared to commit himself, then nobody's going to.... BUT:
Now I am moving towards the argumentation that it should replace everyone's Soundbooth, which is why I need the justification. I would run the tests myself over the current set of files, but with the license gone, I cannot.
Your real justification isn't going to be based on anything like dodgy process measurements at all, but this: Soundbooth is discontinued - there's very little, if any, support for it now, and there will be no updates to cope with OS changes, etc. Audition, on the other hand, is a long-term, well-supported software product that's under active development, and this is clearly intended to continue. Also there are business package deals to be done (like active subscriptions, etc) that simply weren't available to Soundbooth users, which companies can use far more flexibly. I think you'll find that arguements like this will cut far more mustard than any odious comparisons of 'speed' will.

Difference between RFC, SYSTEM and AUDIT users?

Hi All,
Can you highlight the main differences between the following users:
RFC
SYSTEM
AUDIT
how do their functions differenciate them ?
Thanks in advance,
Diwakar

RFC User
RFC user is basicly used to receive status messages. An RFC user has to be created in all the system clients where messages needs to be recieved. An RFC user can also be used for receiving messages using SMTP plug-in.
The RFC User is an sap user of type System and that's why no person can logon with this user on SAP System.
Following is thr procedure to create RFC User, remember the purpose is to recieve messages including status messages as well.
Creation of RFC User
Go to Tools > Administration > User Maintenance > Users.
Enter a name, for example MAIL_ADMIN.
Select "New"
On the Logon data tab page, select the user type System.
Enter a password.
On the Profiles tab page, enter the authorization profile S_A.SCON. This profile minimizes the risk of misuse, even if the communication system does not store the password is encoded form.
Select "Save"
Both RFC user and a System user are of type System only. Now the difference, depends upon the profile and authorization of the user.
Audit users are of type dialog, and can be used by a person to logon to system. There might be many roles assigned to this user. My understanding is that an Audit User is not a standard sap type user but just a dialog user and can be created with a conventional method of creating any other dialog users with a specific profile and authorizations.
Still to confirm, Can you please tell us, how many types of users does it shown in 4.6c at the time of user creation?
Best Regards,
Amol Bharti

Levels differ between Premier CC and Audition CC.

I'm sending Audition a sequence from Premier CC. When I send the file to Audition the audio levels are different. In Premier a peak will go to -6db while in Audition the same peak will only go to-15. Has anyone else experienced this. I am having a hard time taking files to Auditoion if the Audio levels are not standard. Please help!

I'm having this problem as well. I typically mix my edits in Audition but have given up over the past couple months since my levels are always different once imported. Levels on audio clips could be higher, or lower, but I can never trust that they're going to be imported correctly anymore.
It only started happening a few months ago for me. Before that the process used to be pretty painless. That being said, I adjust almost all my audio clips in Adobe Premiere by right clicking and choosing "Adjust Audio Levels." I wonder if that has something to do with it.
Additionally, in trying to solve the problem, I've exported OMFs and noticed similar issues with them as well. I prefer not to use an OMF since all of my audio tracks get split into L and R channels (so if I have 20 audio tracks I now have 40). It doesn't matter though because the levels in the OMFs are messed up too. It scares me because half of these projects go to outside sound mixers. I try to mix as close as possible to how I think things should sound while editing in Premiere. But if the levels are all over the place when it goes to sound mix, the mixer will likely be both frustrated and uninformed. It just creates more work for everyone.
These last few updates that have been pushed out have been nightmares and I'm inclined to think that this issue has something to do with them. Frankly, I wish I stayed at 7.0. I just absolutely cannot mix anything in Audition anymore. All of my dialogue tracks are super high, then my SFX and Music is dialed down super low. Nothing like how I had them set. It's infuriating to say the least.
And yes, I've changed the Multitrack setting to Left/Right (Logorithmic).

Difference between enterprise metrics and interactive reporting

All, I am looking for a tool which can handle the KPIs, traffic signalling,digital cockpit etc. Which one is better either enterprise metrics or interactive reporting.I feel interactive reporting has has more scripting on this. Does enterprise metrics doesnt have scripting.will it be better option. Please clarify. Regards R.Prasanna

Check out the licensing doc:
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10464_04/core.904/b13696/toc.htm
Pavna

Variance key for calculating variance between planned price and actual cost

Hello CO Experts,
I am not following standard cost estimate. I am using price control V for FG. Now I did all the process:
1. Process Order creation
2. Process Order confirmation
3. Template Execution
4. Process Order revaluation
5. Process Order - TECO.
Now when I am running KKS2 (Variance), system is giving following error:
Only remaining var. in version 0 - no target costs for 000001000047
It means system is searching target cost in process order. However, since I didn't executed standard cost, system will populate target cost. Hence my requirement is that the system should calculate variance with respect to planned cost.
Also I have assigned variance key to target version 1. In that assignment, I have selected "planned / preliminary cost" in target cost section.
When I am running KKS2 (variance analysis), system is calculating for both versions. Because of this, it is giving error. There is no input parameter, where I can give specific version.
Please help

Hi Deepak,
For Finished Goods materials if you assigned Price control V (Moving Average) it is irrelevant to run the Standard Cost Estimation.
My earlier client we don't have variance because of the Moving Average Price for Finished Goods.
Please check, It is really required Variance?? If it is required check whether variance key is automatically assigned to Process order or not. (Control Tab)
Ravi Polampalli

Variance between total value and net value

Dear all
In the service entry sheet, the net value including tax field is 110 but the total value field is 100. Actually both should be Rs.100 only.
What may be the reason?

hi
Thanks for the reply.
Input tax
In my service entry sheet, NAVM-Non deductible tax is getting added with the base price. Gross value of unit is 10, but net value incl tax is Rs 10.14. How can i make the system to calculate Gross value is equal to Net value incl of tax? I dont want the system to add Non deductible tax. Kindly help
Regards

Looking for a report in LCM(Landed Cost Management)

Dear All,
We are looking for a report in LCM module to print all the unmatched/ partially matched receipt numbers with outstanding balance in accural account.
Does any one have idea on this? or worked on similar reports before?.
Detailed requirement:
There are PO order receipts for which certain costs are estimated viz. Customs Duty, Clearance Chgs. Etc.
Once the receipt is made, the inventory is valued based on the estimates. Subsequently when the actual invoice for the costs i.e. Customs Duty, Clearance Chg. are booked, there could be a variance. This difference in the estimated and actuals gets transferred to inventory provided stock exists.
However if stocks does not exist then the revaluation does not happen. In such cases we need to monitor such balances.

Hi Melvin,
You can use the User Data Dump tool. Check out the following post: https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3403809#3403809
HTH,
Chris

Inventory Audit Report and Inventory G/L Account discrepancy

Good Day!
Hi Everybody. I had experienced a discrepancy between the Inventory Audit Report and Inventory G/L Account.
Before everything else, our client does not have any PO, GRPO. Only A/P Invoice and A/P Credit Memos so there are no difference being posted.
There were also no transactions posted directly in Inventory G/L Account but from observation, there is a minor difference. This only happened with two transactions in AP Invoice with Negative Quantity.
The AP Invoice is composed of a single item, the unit price is 180.00 x -58 pcs quantity. Total amount is -10,440.00.
G/L Account posting is
Inventory 10,440.00
A/P 10,440.00
In the FIFO layering, the item cost is 200.00 (based on the current stock value) and the current stock quantity before posting is 80 pcs . Since this is a negative quantity A/P Invoice, it seems that the cost of the item when the transaction will be posted is 200 (based on the current stock value) so when I view the Inventory Audit Report amount, it says the inventory cost/posting is -11,600 (200 x -58).
But on actual G/L Account, the posting is -10,440.00 from A/P Invoice, that's why the inventory discrepancy occurs. It seems that SAP B1's Inventory Audit Report confuses the FIFO cost posted versus G/L Account's posted based on the document. Since the document is A/P Invoice, SAP B1 assumes that the transaction will post the amount as the additional inventory cost and posting the inventory cost into Inventory G/L Account. However, since this is a negative document, the system is releasing the items, thus, FIFO kicks in. The Inventory Audit Report catches the amount based on FIFO costing. The problem is that the Inventory Audit Report is more accurate than the Inventory G/L Balance.
Any suggestion to fix this guys?

HI,
i'my afraid you're in the wrong place. This is the Chinese forum. Please go to SAP Business One Application for help.
Best

Difference between Drilldown report and Interactive report

There is no difference between drill down and interactive report, they are the same.
With drilldown reporting, SAP provides you with an interactive information system to let you evaluate the data collected in your application. This information system is capable of analyzing all the data according to any of the characteristics that describe the data. You can also use any key figures you wish to categorize your data. You can display a number of objects for a given key figure, or a number of key figures for a given object. In addition, the system lets you carry out any number of variance analyses (such as plan/actual comparisons, fiscal year comparisons, comparisons of different objects, and so on).
You can produce both simple, data-directed lists (basic reports) and complex, formatted lists in drilldown reporting (form reports).
Drilldown report provides you with comfortable functions for navigating through your data. For example, you can jump to the next level of detail or the next report object on the same level, hide individual levels and switch between the detail and drilldown lists. It also provides a number of additional functions which let you process lists interactively (sorting, conditions, ranking lists, and so on). SAP Graphics, SAPmail and the Excel List Viewer are also integrated into drilldown reporting.
The drilldown functions are divided into three groups which differ in the number of functions available. That way each user can choose the functional level most suited for his requirements.
In addition to the online functions for displaying reports, drilldown reporting also provides functions which let you print reports. A number of formatting functions are available to let you determine the look of your printed reports (page breaks, headers and footers, underscores, and so on).
The menus and the functions available directly on the drilldown report make it easy to use the information system.
What is an Interactive Report?
An interactive report generally works in the following fashion:
1. Basic list is displayed.
2. User double clicks on any valid line
    or
    User selects a line and presses as button on the tool bar.
3. The corresponding event is triggered
4. Then in the code, the line on which action was done, is read.
5. Depending on the values in that selected line, a secondary list is displayed.
6. Steps from 2-5 are repeated till the end.
From the above explanation, I believe, its clear that, the 20th list, will essentially depend on the "selected line" of 19th list. According to your question, you want to move to 20th list directly, without "a prior list". May I know the exact requirement so that, an appropriate solution can be suggested?
Again, your question was, how to move to 20th list directly on pressing of execute button. Its not possible to move to 20th list. You must cross over a basic list, before you can go to a different list level, using the code given by Pavan.
What are Drilldown reports?
The lines of basic list of a drilldown report when clicked, will take the user to the corresponding (standard) object's display.
For eg: Suppose your report's primary component is purchase requisition, (assume you are printing PR details), and the basic list displays details of many PRs.
Eg: when clicked on a particular line of the PR basic list, it takes you to std t-code me53 (display of purchase requisition). This is the 'Drill-down' functionality.
For this, in the at-line selection of your program, as per the above ex: you'll set the parameter ID of PR number BAN (that you can get from Data element) in memory (using set parameter id) and then calling the corresponding transaction (usually skipping initial screen of the std t-code).
Likewise, if it's Material Number (Matnr), you'll be displaying MM03 transaction w.r.t. the line's matnr.
AKSHAT..........

Good, information. But I think you should post these items in Wiki, in place of forum, as here we have Qns & Ans; problems and solutions.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki
[ABAP Development > ABAP General ]
Wiki is the right place for such knowledge base
Thanks!!
Regards,
Vishal.

Variance between G/L and audit report incase of Landed cost

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for