VOIP over VPN dropp RTP protocol

We are installing a new 2911 ISR in our office and connecting with a Linksys (CISCO) RV016 VPN router.  These are two small doctors offices that need to have computer, and Voip traffic over a VPN.
Currently we connect an older RV082 and the RV016 together and have NO issues with VOIP traffic.  If we establish a connection with the 2911 router then we are having an issue with no voice or RTP traffic coming through.  Phones will connect, and dial out, but no voice can be heard.
The First office is on a Verizon Fios Network with a MTU of 1492. The Network and servers are as follows:
Remote Office                                                                            Main Office
Linksys Spa 942 phones
               |                                                                        
Netgear 10/100 POE Switch
               |                                                                        =================
Linksys (cisco) RV016 VPN                                            |          2911                 |
               |                                                                       |    POE Module Sw     |
Comcast Cable Modem                                                  -------------------------------       
               |                                                                                       |          |
             VPN                                                                                VPN       |
               +=======================================+     Asterisk
                                                                                                              (Call Man)
Basically we have the Internet coming in from Gig0/0 and routing traffic to multiple outside IP addresses so we are using 3 subs in our configuration.
192.168.1.X          192.168.2.X          192.168.3.X               192.168.0.X (Remote Group)
When we connect the old routers (RV016 and RV082) VPN VOIP and Data traffic go fine.   We are using a Term Server on one end, Web Server, and the Asterisk PBX for our VOIP Call Manager.
So far we connect up the 2911 and the RV016 and have no issues with data traffic.  But the VOIP is dead on the remote end.  No sound.  We did a Wireshark on traffic, and we are getting some 407 errors from the Astersick Host, and a unknown RTP version 1 error message.  THe only thing that we had to do on the RV082 router was port forward UDP 506 and 10001 - 20000 for the traffic, and setup a access rule, but nothing else.
We are getting traffic on the 2911, but nothing else.  We have excluded the 192.158.0.X traffic from the NAT so not to get into that issue, and have even tried forwarding ports but nothing seems to help.  Is there a good way to route this traffic?  Our bandwidth is pretty fast so I am not sure if QoS is needed, but if so it is not one of my strong areas.  What is the best way to route this traffic through the VPN without loosing the RTP part of the call.

I put this line in and still not getting audio on the other end.  I will be doing captures tonight from working and non working phones.  I need to get this resolved.  I have spent 3 weeks on this issue and I have run out of time.  Should I use the DEBUG VOIP SIP command for the capture on the router?  I believe this would be the best resolution to the service to see what is going on.  The phones work with a RV016 and RV082 router in place.  All data traffic works fine in sending and recieving calls.
I have read about all of the articles on Cisco and voip traffic.  We are going to be shutting off the natting on the router to see if I can just get the voip traffic to flow.  Once we get it flowing then I can work on building up the house on a stable foundation.
At this time, we are routing multiple IP addresses throught the 2911 and have IP NAT OUTSIDE on the G0/0 port and IP NAT INSIDE on the G1/0 Interface, which is a POE Switch Module in the 2911.
I know that the cisco router wants to act as a call manager, or terminate the SIP traffic on the 2911, but we have a working Asterisk box that handles all SIP traffic.  If there is a way to just forward the traffic there properly, without the 2911 trying to intercept the traffic, that would be wonderful.  I am looking at the possibility of creating dial-peer groups for all of the phones, but really is this needed?  What is so frustrating about the whole situation is that I put in a 5 year old sub $200 router and everything works.
Dale

Similar Messages

  • VOIP over VPN need clarification

    Hi,
    Recently I have implemented Site-to-Site VPN between ASA and sonic wall firewall.
    Problem: I can able to make call from ASA side(inside) Ip phone to sonic wall (inside) side Ip phone and vice versa and it’s ringing, But not able to hear voice. So I created VOIP over VPN configuration and applied appropriate service policy towards outside interface. But still I was not able to hear voice.
    Tried below mentioned t’shot steps:
    From ASA side we had two subnets (10.20.1.x/24 – Data and 10.20.2.x/24 – Voice ) and one subnet (192.168.x.x/24 ) from sonic wall side as interesting traffic ( lan to lan). When I configured site-to-site configuration on both ends my phase-1 and phase-2 came UP and can able to communicate between each other. (In interesting traffic I created two objects and bind those objects as one object-group for source i.e. ASA side lan subnet and one object for remote-Lan as destination)
    My call manager is rest behind ASA and Ip phones needs to communicate from sonic wall side to inside ASA.
    I can able to make call from ASA side(inside) Ip phone to sonic wall (inside) side Ip phone and vice versa and it’s ringing, But not able to hear voice. So I created VOIP over VPN configuration and applied appropriate service policy towards outside interface. But still I was not able to hear voice.
    So, I  done supernetting the data subnet and voice subnet into single network i.e. 10.20.x.x/16 at ASA side and applied the configuration changes (changed ACL, nonat rule, Voice QOS ACL accordingly), and I’m able to hear voice both end and I can communicate properly from ASA inside Ip phone to Sonic wall inside Ip phone and vice versa.
    My question: I’m not understanding the logic how this supernetting resolved dead voice issue.
    Pls clarify my question I’m bit confused on this.

    It's not recommended. Although VPNs guarantee a secure pipe end-to-end, they don't guarantee latency and variations in latency (Jitter).

  • VoIP over VPN won't work

    Hi,
    I have a Cisco ASA 5540 running 8.2(5). When I dial a phone on the other of the the VPN the first time I get a blank after it rings(i.e when the voice mail get activated ot if someone picks the phone up), however works the second and consequent times i dial.
    A little background.
    Two sites A and B connected via IPsec Tunnel. No problems in communication except for the VoIP issue.
    A Phone in on site A(172.17.168.x) and other on site B(192.168.103.x)
    SiteA and SiteB is connected via an IPsec tunnel on the Cisco ASA.
    First call fails.
    Second call works.
    Result of a packet trace is also the same. The UDP packet get drops when tried for the first time but subsequent ones pass.
    Any ideas on how to fix this?
    First time
    ASA5520# packet-tracer input inside udp 172.17.168.95 10000 192.168.3.103 10000
    Phase: 1
    Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP
    Subtype: input
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    in   0.0.0.0         0.0.0.0         outside
    Phase: 2
    Type: IP-OPTIONS
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
    in  id=0xb13db840, priority=0, domain=inspect-ip-options, deny=true
    hits=2603604, user_data=0x0, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
    src ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
    dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
    Phase: 3
    Type: NAT-EXEMPT
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:      
      match ip inside 172.17.168.0 255.255.255.0 outside 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0
        NAT exempt
        translate_hits = 141, untranslate_hits = 6
    Additional Information:
    Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
    in  id=0xb13eccf0, priority=6, domain=nat-exempt, deny=false
    hits=323, user_data=0xb13ecc30, cs_id=0x0, use_real_addr, flags=0x0, protocol=0
    src ip=172.17.168.0, mask=255.255.255.0, port=0
    dst ip=192.168.0.0, mask=255.255.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
    Phase: 4
    Type: NAT
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
      match ip inside any outside any
        dynamic translation to pool 1 (Public IP)
        translate_hits = 1005381, untranslate_hits = 37221
    Additional Information:
    Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
    in  id=0xb1490078, priority=1, domain=nat, deny=false
    hits=1805592, user_data=0xb148ffb8, cs_id=0x0, flags=0x0, protocol=0
    src ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
    dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
    Phase: 5
    Type: NAT
    Subtype: host-limits
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
      match ip inside any outside any
        dynamic translation to pool 1 (Public IP)
        translate_hits = 1005392, untranslate_hits = 37221
    Additional Information:
    Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
    in  id=0xb14903b0, priority=1, domain=host, deny=false
    hits=2728036, user_data=0xb148ffb8, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
    src ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
    dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
    Phase: 6
    Type: VPN
    Subtype: encrypt
    Result: DROP
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
    out id=0xb1fbe6a0, priority=70, domain=encrypt, deny=false
    hits=106, user_data=0x0, cs_id=0xb1fa5bc8, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
    src ip=172.17.168.0, mask=255.255.255.0, port=0
    dst ip=192.168.0.0, mask=255.255.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
    Result:
    input-interface: inside
    input-status: up
    input-line-status: up
    output-interface: outside
    output-status: up
    output-line-status: up
    Action: drop
    Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
    Second time
    ASA5520# packet-tracer input inside udp 172.17.168.95 10000 192.168.3.103 10000
    Phase: 1
    Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP
    Subtype: input
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    in   0.0.0.0         0.0.0.0         outside
    Phase: 2
    Type: IP-OPTIONS
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
    in  id=0xb13db840, priority=0, domain=inspect-ip-options, deny=true
    hits=2603850, user_data=0x0, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
    src ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
    dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
    Phase: 3
    Type: NAT-EXEMPT
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:      
      match ip inside 172.17.168.0 255.255.255.0 outside 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0
        NAT exempt
        translate_hits = 142, untranslate_hits = 6
    Additional Information:
    Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
    in  id=0xb13eccf0, priority=6, domain=nat-exempt, deny=false
    hits=324, user_data=0xb13ecc30, cs_id=0x0, use_real_addr, flags=0x0, protocol=0
    src ip=172.17.168.0, mask=255.255.255.0, port=0
    dst ip=192.168.0.0, mask=255.255.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
    Phase: 4
    Type: NAT
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
      match ip inside any outside any
        dynamic translation to pool 1 (Public IP)
        translate_hits = 1005470, untranslate_hits = 37222
    Additional Information:
    Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
    in  id=0xb1490078, priority=1, domain=nat, deny=false
    hits=1805881, user_data=0xb148ffb8, cs_id=0x0, flags=0x0, protocol=0
    src ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
    dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
    Phase: 5
    Type: NAT
    Subtype: host-limits
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
      match ip inside any outside any
        dynamic translation to pool 1 (Public IP)
        translate_hits = 1005479, untranslate_hits = 37223
    Additional Information:
    Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
    in  id=0xb14903b0, priority=1, domain=host, deny=false
    hits=2728365, user_data=0xb148ffb8, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
    src ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
    dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
    Phase: 6
    Type: VPN
    Subtype: encrypt
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
    out id=0xb23a5060, priority=70, domain=encrypt, deny=false
    hits=1, user_data=0x202004, cs_id=0xb1fa5bc8, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
    src ip=172.17.168.0, mask=255.255.255.0, port=0
    dst ip=192.168.0.0, mask=255.255.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
    Phase: 7
    Type: VPN
    Subtype: ipsec-tunnel-flow
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    Reverse Flow based lookup yields rule:
    in  id=0xb237e278, priority=69, domain=ipsec-tunnel-flow, deny=false
    hits=1, user_data=0x2040e4, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
    src ip=192.168.0.0, mask=255.255.0.0, port=0
    dst ip=172.17.168.0, mask=255.255.255.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
    Phase: 8
    Type: IP-OPTIONS
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    Reverse Flow based lookup yields rule:
    in  id=0xb138d7e0, priority=0, domain=inspect-ip-options, deny=true
    hits=2440659, user_data=0x0, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
    src ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
    dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
    Phase: 9
    Type: FLOW-CREATION
    Subtype:
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional Information:
    New flow created with id 2676819, packet dispatched to next module
    Module information for forward flow ...
    snp_fp_tracer_drop
    snp_fp_inspect_ip_options
    snp_fp_adjacency
    snp_fp_encrypt
    snp_fp_fragment
    snp_ifc_stat
    Module information for reverse flow ...
    snp_fp_tracer_drop
    snp_fp_inspect_ip_options
    snp_fp_ipsec_tunnel_flow
    snp_fp_adjacency
    snp_fp_fragment
    snp_ifc_stat
    Result:
    input-interface: inside
    input-status: up
    input-line-status: up
    output-interface: outside
    output-status: up
    output-line-status: up
    Action: allow

    No I haven't, but I'll call them today. That doesnt explain the VPN stopped working though, and at this point I'd rather have L2TP/IPSec working to my box at home, rather than an unencrypted session running over port 445. Appreciate the suggestion though...

  • SoftPhone over VPN audio issue

    Having a "one-way" audio issue when IPC connects over VPN to any Main Office IP Phones (7960). Remote IPC (softphone) shows "0 Received" Packets, but the IP Phone shows them as being sent.
    This does NOT happen if IPC contacts another IPC on a PC at Main Site, or any kind of phone at the other branch offices.
    Have looked at all of the audio settings on the VPN IPC unit, they are correct.
    Any ideas?

    Try to sniff the Ethernet traffic during call setup at the CallManager. When Callmanager sends Call Control messages to remote party, it could send wrong IP address or UDP port as an RTP parameters.
    Another components could block the traffic are firewalls. How do you have your VPN tunnel built? Do you use Cisco VPN Client? What terminates your VPN traffic at the central location? PIX, VPN3000 or Router? Traffic may go one way without a change, and some protocol FixUp may be triggered for this traffic on the way back. If you have access to firewall logs, check if you have any traffic dropped.
    Good luck,
    Mike
    http://www.headsetadapter.com

  • No modem conection with voip over frame-relay

    I'm trying to connect two modems through voip over frame-relay network using the modem passthrough command but that is no working. The voice calls is operating very well but the modems no connect between them. I'm using G-729 codec with ip header compression and data fragment in 80 bytes.

    There are some know issues with cisco dsps and V.90+ modems, but we have been able to get most modems to work correctly accross our network. If you are using g729 for all other voice calls you will want to use the modem passthrough command to have both gw's turn to modem passthrough. I typically set up each dial peer with the specific commands, since I have found the global commands are not consistently applied. Here is a sample dial peer config....
    dial-peer voice 3 voip
    description Default voip peer
    preference 1
    incoming called-number .T
    destination-pattern .T
    progress_ind setup enable 3
    progress_ind connect enable 8
    modem passthrough nse codec g711ulaw
    voice-class codec 1
    session protocol sipv2
    session target sip-server
    dtmf-relay rtp-nte
    fax rate disable
    fax protocol pass-through g711ulaw
    ip qos dscp cs3 signaling
    no vad
    Some of these commands are specific to the isdn signaling set up we have at this site. Also, we are using sip hence the sip session target. But the modem and fax passthrough commands are pretty much universal.
    Also, some of those commands are not supported until 12.2.13. You might want to think about an ios upgrade.

  • CUPC Over VPN

    We resolved a VPN issue that was preventing us to be able to log in to CUPC over VPN. I am now able to log in, I can see my buddy list and their status, however the CUPC status in the bottom of the window is listed as "Offline (No Network)".
    Server Health:
    Logon Server: Not Connected - Disconnected
    Phone Config: Downloaded
    Presence: Connected
    Desk Phone: Not Connected
    Softphone: Not Active
    Voicemail: Connected
    Secure Messaging: Not Connected - Server Unreachable
    LDAP: Not Available - Server Unreachable
    What could be causing some of the servers to be connected while others are disconnected? We are running Microsoft ISA VPN.

    This is likely an ISA VPN configuration issue. CUPC creates separate connections to each system. For example, voicemail is an IMAP or secure IMAP connection, presence is a SIP connection, desk Phone is CTI, etc. All traffic is not tunneled through CUPS.
    You will need to troubleshoot the individual protocols to understand why Microsoft's VPN product is not properly transproting them. A good place to start would be attempting telnet connections from the VPN-connected machine to the locations specified in the relavent profile on CUPS. Example: Can you telnet to your LDAP server's port as defined in CUPS?

  • Voice over vpn-call not completing

    Hi folks,
    I got a problem,where with voice over vpn. So far my voip calls were running purely on shared IP internet. Today we had tried to make two side a vpn site-to-site tunnel and send traffic thru.vpn is working. (md5,des)
    The problem We faced is when i dial a number, the other side party's phone rings for 6-8 seconds and the call gets disconnected.Whether or not the called party answers the call gets disconnected after 6-8 secs. Iam not getting any ring back, while actually other side phone rings. No voice is going thru.
    my network is normalpbx--to--Cisco3800 to--Pix--to--QuintumGateway
    isdn debug shows Cause code18-no user responding.
    help me on this...

    Hi,
    can you provide configurations of the voice gateway and pix.
    Anyway my best guess is the PIX:)
    Check timers, check security policies.

  • VOIP over broadband - with QoS?

    At the moment we use Cisco 2600 routers with 256k BT kilostream connections to our stations, to provide IT and Cisco VOIP. The kilostream connections cost about ?5k/station/year.
    We want to stream video for the IT, but the kilostream isn't up to it. We also have BT broadband (20:1 contention), to the station, generally between 2-8M, which costs about ?500/station/year. We can do video over that fine.
    My questions are:-
    1) I'd like to get rid of the expensive kilostream and just use broadband. However, we have about 10-25 VOIP phones on each station, and we keep being told that broadband could not support that, the latency is too high, the reliability too low, that it needs QoS and you can't get that with this infrastructure etc etc. Can I use Cisco VOIP over broadband to 2600 routers, would QoS work and what about the quality/reliability? If it is possible, any hints as to how?
    2) As an alternative, I was wondering if I could have both kilostream and broadband connected to the back of my 2600 and have different services going over the two connections (eg voice over kilostream and IT over broadband)? And if so, maybe I could have failover from one to another? Can I do this, and if so, any ideas how?
    I don't know if it helps, but we normally terminate our broadband IPSEC VPNs on our WatchGuard firewall, although we do also have a Microsoft ISA firewall that we could use instead.
    Any help you are able to offer would be very gratefully received.
    Regards
    Eric

    At the moment we use Cisco 2600 routers with 256k BT kilostream connections to our stations, to provide IT and Cisco VOIP. The kilostream connections cost about ?5k/station/year.
    We want to stream video for the IT, but the kilostream isn't up to it. We also have BT broadband (20:1 contention), to the station, generally between 2-8M, which costs about ?500/station/year. We can do video over that fine.
    My questions are:-
    1) I'd like to get rid of the expensive kilostream and just use broadband. However, we have about 10-25 VOIP phones on each station, and we keep being told that broadband could not support that, the latency is too high, the reliability too low, that it needs QoS and you can't get that with this infrastructure etc etc. Can I use Cisco VOIP over broadband to 2600 routers, would QoS work and what about the quality/reliability? If it is possible, any hints as to how?
    2) As an alternative, I was wondering if I could have both kilostream and broadband connected to the back of my 2600 and have different services going over the two connections (eg voice over kilostream and IT over broadband)? And if so, maybe I could have failover from one to another? Can I do this, and if so, any ideas how?
    I don't know if it helps, but we normally terminate our broadband IPSEC VPNs on our WatchGuard firewall, although we do also have a Microsoft ISA firewall that we could use instead.
    Any help you are able to offer would be very gratefully received.
    Regards
    Eric

  • RTP protocol - reordering packets

    Hi,
    Which is the tolerance of RTP protocol to reorder out of sequence packets? I mean, I'm testing a link sending UDP packets to echo port (RFC 822), and you see that packets are out of sequence, but you can establish a voip call with acceptable quality.
    I understand that RTP reorders voice packets if they arrive out of sequence so, is there any limitation in time (ms) between out of sequence packets voice packets that RTP is able to reorder them?
    Best regards.
    Sergio
    Uruguay

    reorder limitation depends upon the jitter buffer play-out delay.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1834/products_feature_guide09186a008008033c.html

  • AirPlay over VPN or 3G ??

    Hello to all.
    is there any way to use airplay over 3G or over VPN?
    if there is a rollout for this?
    Thank you

    If you setup a VPN correctly then any remote devices will obtain an IP address within the subnet of your home/office network.  As long as the following ports are open, you're idevice won't be able to tell the difference and you will be able to use your airplay connection over VPN:
    Port Number
    Type
    Protocol
    RFC
    Used by
    80
    TCP
    HTTP
    2616
    AirPlay
    443
    TCP
    HTTPS
    AirPlay
    554
    UDP / TCP
    RTSP
    2326
    AirPlay
    3689
    TCP
    DAAP
    iTunes Music Sharing / AirPlay
    5297
    TCP
    Bonjour
    5289
    TCP / UDP
    Bonjour
    5353
    UDP
    MDNS
    Bonjour / AirPlay
    49159
    UDP
    MDNS (Windows)
    Bonjour / AirPlay
    49163
    UDP
    MDNS (Windows)
    Bonjour / AirPlay

  • Jabber call to voice mail fails with fast busy over VPN

    I have an issue that I ran into with CIPC phones over a VPN.  If a CIPC phone called over a VPN and started ringing a phone the call would fail with fast busy at the time the call would be forwarded to voicemail.  I found the issue was when remote the CIPC phone would negotiate the g.729 codec, when forwarded to a voicemail pilot over a SIP trunk set to g.711 the call would fail due to codec missmatch when no transcoders are present.
    So now I am running into what I believe to be the same issue with Jabber, when on premise the calls to voice mail work just fine, but when remote they fail.  I can directly call the voicemail pilot without error, but if calling a phone the call gets fast busy at the point we are forwarded to voicemail.  Even though all my regions are set to talk to all other regions on G.711 and the voicemail SIP trunk is set to G.711, I believe with the new features in CUCM9 that a lower speed codec has been negotiated since the we are going over the VPN, or Jabber has done this as it knows it's over VPN (not sure).  WIth CIPC I could go into the settings and turn off the Optimize for Bandwidth check box and the call would negotiate G.711.  With Jabber I can't find anything that would tell my Jabber client to stay on G.711 and I can only imagine this is a codec missmatch as the following are true.
    1. CIPC and Jabber share the same line
    2. VPN established and CIPC optimised for low bandwidth un-checked
    3. Over the same VPN the CIPC phone can leave a voicemail
    4. Over the same VPN the Jabber client gets fast busy once forwarded to voicemail
    5. Voicemail environment is Exchange-UM over SIP trunk
    6. SIP trunk is assigned a Device Pool, that is assigned to a region that all other regions communicate G.711 to
    7. On CIPC if optimised for low bandwidth is checked I get the exact same issue as I get with the Jabber client (fast busy when forwarded to voicemail)
    Would anyone know what I can do in CUCM 9 to fix this issue, as said no issue when all devices are on premise.  Wondering if there is a service parameter or a way to change the codec selection so the Jabber client attempts to always negotiate G.711.  The correct answer would be to get some PVDM DSP resources and kick up a transcoder in my resource group, and that may be what I talk them into doing if I have no other options.                  

    We have been getting the exact same thing for almost a year now... since switching to FiOS Digital Voice in May of last year!  Every time I call in to report it they 'escalate' the issue but it never gets resolved.  The problem seems to be in the initial connection.  Most of the time it works fine but, several times a month, after I call to get messages and it starts to play the new message it goes dead and I get the busy signal.  I get the same message when I call back:  “I’m sorry – that account is in use at this time.  Please try again later!”  I have even called in with my cell phone and get the same message!  I HAVE EVEN used the Internet to see if I could get my messages and, when I hit Play, I get a pop-up saying: “Your Voice Mail box is currently in being accessed; please try again later.  If the problem continues, please contact our Customer Support Center at 1-888-553-1555. We apologize for any inconvenience.”  This is obviously a software bug that Verizon has no clue on how to troubleshoot OR fix!!!  I wonder how many people have the problem and just don’t bother reporting it because of the hassle?  When it first started happening they destroyed my entire mailbox and I had to re-enter the complete mailbox setup again – 3 times!!!  NEVER let them talk you into that!!!  It’s their problem and they need to fix it!!!!!!!  I wish I could go back to the ‘normal’ voicemail we originally had… they want hundred$ to switch back because I’d be breaking my #$@%^&* contract!  Good luck if you have Verizon………

  • How can i use an existing vpn connection without using the option "Send all traffic over vpn connection"?

    I have been trying to get my computer (os x.7) to astablish a remote desktop connection to my work computer via a vpn tunnel. In fact I have just discovered that it works fine if i select to "send all traffic over vpn connection" from the options in the advanced setup of the vpn.
    If the option is selected microsofts "Remote desktop connection for mac" works just fine. However without selecting the option it is not taking advantage of the tunnel but tries to connect as if the tunnel would not exist.
    Now the question is how do I get program to use the vpn tunnel without checking the above option?
    Thanks for any hints and pointers.

    Then can her computer be authorized to both accounts?
    Absolutely. You can authorize any given computer to up to five iTunes Store accounts.
    If purchases are made on her account, to a computer authorized to my account, can I put those songs on my iPod?
    If you connect your iPod to her computer, yes. Tracks download only to the computer from which they're purchased, regardless of which iTunes Store account is used for the purchase. Or you could copy the tracks from her computer to yours and then authorize your computer to her iTunes Store account. But that's sort of defeating the original purpose, it would seem to me.
    is it better to buy music through Amazon downloads and/or actually purchasing CDs to avoid the security features iTunes puts on its music?
    That's certainly an option. If it's an entire album I want, I buy CDs. That way I can import them at the quality I want and to whichever of my systems I want. Amazon or one of the other download stores that offer tracks as MP3 are also an option, though for me download stores are best when you just want a couple of tracks off a given CD.

  • DNS over VPN

    Hi community,
    I am having some trouble with dns over vpn. On server side of VPN the dns is working 100% i.e servername.domain.com resolves to local IP address correctly from within network. However, when i connect into network over VPN the dns does not work correctly - it resolves servername correctly but not servername.domain.com. I can overcome this by setting VPN above my Ethernet adaptor in service order but then all my traffic gets routed over VPN connection (which i don't want) - even if I try adding network routing defn on VPN server. I probably need to do something on the VPN client (Snow leopard 10.6.1)?
    Please help!

    Rather than dnsmasq and openwrt, I'd look at the DNS server here.
    My guess here would be that the DNS configuration is invalid, or the domain name incorrect, or such.
    For a simple split-brain, you'll have one forward zone with your local Mac OS X Server box as the DNS server, and one (created for you) reverse DNS zone. And you'll be using a unique domain name or (far better) a publicly-registered DNS domain. But this smells like a DNS error.
    Post the +dig -x+ of the IP address on your LAN, and the +dig host+ and +dig host.example.com+ of the domain name on your LAN. And given this DNS information is either public or is behind a firewall and thus accessible only via VPN, please post the real data rather than masked data.

  • No iTunes sync over VPN

    I would like to do an iTunes sync over VPN but this doesn't work.
    Has anyone ever done this?
    I set up VPN service on my 10.6 server and VPN works fine, I can VPN on from an outside computer to my network w/ no issue and see my network.
    When I VPN to my network on my iPad or iPhone, I get connected and the device gets an ip but I can't initiate a iTunes sync.
    Was this just not meant to be? It should.

    I'm working on trying to figure this out too.  I have a working VPN setup.  To sync itunes, I am thinking that the itunes on the remote computer must have an itunes library that points to the main itunes library on the host computer.  I think I have changed my itunes library on my remote computer to the library on the host via Preferences and the Advanced tab.  There is a place there to change the location of your itunes library.  When I click change, I can navigate to the itunes media location on the host.
    I am syncing now, and will be able to confirm the results tomorrow when I have access to the host.  Hopefully the sync won't have messed something up.  But, I am thinking this is working...

  • Jabber 9.5 phone service not registering over VPN

    TCT devices register fine over Any Connect VPN until I upgraded to 9.5!
    After upgrade IM/P and Voice Mail services connect successfully over VPN but phone service indicates it fails to get configuration from server.
    Everything works locally.  Any ideas what might have changed with 9.5 release that would impact ASA config!

    We've come across this issue also except ours is different we can't even login. Just says username or password is invalid.
    Works ok on corporate wifi
    Does not work on anyconnect over internet wifi.
    Does not work on anyconnect over 3G cellular data network.
    I can see it connects to the TFTP server pulls the XML files down connects to each CUP server in HA but both return wrong username and password.
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.594 ERROR [6dee000] - [JabberWerx][log] [CupSoapCli]: login cup failed, reason: Wrong username/password
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.598 ERROR [3c04618c] - [JabberWerx][log] [LoginMgr]: CLoginCup::OnLoginFailed, -1, Wrong username/password
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.599 ERROR [3c04618c] - [JabberWerx][log] [assert]: /Users/jingwliu/depot/jwcpp/branches/s201301mobile/jwcpp/LoginMgr/LoginContext.cpp(940):  CacheCupServer, ASSERT(!"CacheCupServer() not implemented.") failed!
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.600 INFO [3c04618c] - [JabberWerx][log] [LoginMgr]: OnStateChanged CLoginStop::OnStateChanged
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.601 INFO [3c04618c] - [JabberWerx][log] [LoginMgr]: conn, canceled due to no needs. supposed:0, signning-on:0, signed-on:0
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.601 ERROR [3c04618c] - [JabberWerx][log] [LoginMgr]: login, OnError, 10
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.602 ERROR [3c04618c] - [JabberWerx][log] [JabberWerxCPP]: JWLoginSink::OnError, lerr:10
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.602 INFO [3c04618c] - [csf-unified.imp.Login][OnLoginError] ****************************************************************
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.602 INFO [3c04618c] - [csf-unified.imp.Login][OnLoginError] OnLoginError: LERR_CUP_AUTH: <10>. data: 0
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.603 INFO [3c04618c] - [csf-unified.imp.Login][OnLoginError] **************************************************************** -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.594 ERROR [6dee000] - [JabberWerx][log] [CupSoapCli]: login cup failed, reason: Wrong username/password
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.598 ERROR [3c04618c] - [JabberWerx][log] [LoginMgr]: CLoginCup::OnLoginFailed, -1, Wrong username/password
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.599 ERROR [3c04618c] - [JabberWerx][log] [assert]: /Users/jingwliu/depot/jwcpp/branches/s201301mobile/jwcpp/LoginMgr/LoginContext.cpp(940):  CacheCupServer, ASSERT(!"CacheCupServer() not implemented.") failed!
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.600 INFO [3c04618c] - [JabberWerx][log] [LoginMgr]: OnStateChanged CLoginStop::OnStateChanged
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.601 INFO [3c04618c] - [JabberWerx][log] [LoginMgr]: conn, canceled due to no needs. supposed:0, signning-on:0, signed-on:0
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.601 ERROR [3c04618c] - [JabberWerx][log] [LoginMgr]: login, OnError, 10
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.602 ERROR [3c04618c] - [JabberWerx][log] [JabberWerxCPP]: JWLoginSink::OnError, lerr:10
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.602 INFO [3c04618c] - [csf-unified.imp.Login][OnLoginError] ****************************************************************
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.602 INFO [3c04618c] - [csf-unified.imp.Login][OnLoginError] OnLoginError: LERR_CUP_AUTH: <10>. data: 0
    -- 2013-11-06 17:33:30.603 INFO [3c04618c] - [csf-unified.imp.Login][OnLoginError] ****************************************************************
    I've opened a support call with our vendor.

Maybe you are looking for