VoIP providers for WRTP54G

Other than Vonage, will any other VoIP providers work with the WRTP54G router?
Message Edited by steve1970 on 05-23-200702:49 PM

Sorry if the original question was not clear.
As it stand now, if your WRTP54G is designated to be used with the Vonage service, you cannot use it with any other VOIP service. Same goes with Earthlink. If you buy the WRTP54G router specifically designated to be used with Earthlink's TrueVoice, you cannot use it with any other VOIP service. As far as I know, they make three routers - one for Vonage, one for Earthlink, and one labeled "WRTP54G-NA" for basically all the other VOIP services.
However.... If you are computer savvy, you can attempt to "re-flash" the firmware with the NA firmware. There are some sites who have documented the process. This will most likely void your warranty, so use at your own risk.
Hope this answers your question.
Message Edited by mpemberton on 06-25-2007 10:48 PM

Similar Messages

Best Connection For WRTP54G and SA2102?

I can not find details on the best install for the subject router and router/voice adapter. I have been having trouble with my voicemail on VOIP.com. Periodically, I have voicemail but there is no stutter tone or message light. I thought it maybe best to put the SA2102 in front of the wireless router but I could not get connectivity to my PC then. Therefore, I am currently running the SA2102 after the WRTP54G. Everything works except this periodic voicemail problem. I have contacted Linksys and VOIP.com but got no help. I was wondering:
1. What is the best install hookup configuration?
2. In either case, what actions (configuration settings) if any should I take (make) on my adapter or wireless router?
Thanks in advance.
Mike

i'm confused why you need 2 VoIP routers (SPA2102, WRTP54G) unless you just made a typo error and meant WRT54G instead
anyway, I would presume that SPA2102 is the one configured with your VoIP providers' settings. best way to get VoIP to work properly is if the SPA is connected to the modem really...you can set the wireless router to act just as a plain access point to avoid "double NAT"...
--disconnect the wireless router from everything in your network and hardwire just one computer to port 1 of wireless router..under Setup-Advanced Routing subtab disable Firewall & NAT (don't forget to save the settings)
--go back to Basic Setup subtab and disable Local DHCP server (after saving settings it's very likely that you will lose connection to the router's web interface)
--connect an ethernet cable to the Ethernet port of SPA2102 and Port 4 of WRTP54G (nothing will be connected to the Internet port on the wireless)
-- power cycle all devices and the computer should have internet access again
** if you want to access the web interface of the wireless again you would need to set a static IP on your computer like 192.168.15.6 (assuming the LAN IP address of the router is still 192.168.15.1)
**if want easy access to the wireless router without setting static IP you can change the LAN IP address of the wireless router with an IP that is the same range as the DHCP of SPA2102

Cannot click on edit options in Voip providers website after upgrade to Yosemite

I just upgraded my Mac-Mini to Yosemite and now I cannot click on the edit options in my VoIP providers web site. This has been a problem in Internet Explorer for Windoz for a while now and the solution was to use compatibility mode. But I cannot find something similar in Safari. I ended up downloading and using Firefox to accomplish my task. Does anyone know of a workaround other than a different browser? My VoIP provider is unlikely to change their web site for MAC if they wouldn't change it for Windoz. Any help?

I just upgraded my Mac-Mini to Yosemite and now I cannot click on the edit options in my VoIP providers web site. This has been a problem in Internet Explorer for Windoz for a while now and the solution was to use compatibility mode. But I cannot find something similar in Safari. I ended up downloading and using Firefox to accomplish my task. Does anyone know of a workaround other than a different browser? My VoIP provider is unlikely to change their web site for MAC if they wouldn't change it for Windoz. Any help?

Difference between Data Providers for Oracle

Hello,
There are 3 .NET Data Providers for access an Oracle Database:
1) ODP.NET, who uses Oracle API to access an Oracle Database.
2) Microsoft .NET Data Provider for Oracle, who comes in the Assemblie System.Data.OracleClient
3) Microsoft .NET Data Provider for OLE DB.
My questions are:
1) There is another Data Provider to access an Oracle DB ?
2) Which is better, for example to handle LOB fields ?
3) Which is better in performance ?
4) ODP.NET uses some Oracle API to handle a DB, and the others ?
5) What is the requirement (Oracle Client, OS) of each of them ?
Best Regards
Alfredo DS

I would recommend using ODP.NET. Overall, I've seen better performance from it than other Oracle providers. It requires the 9.2 client and any OS that the 9.2 client supports.
With respect to LOBs, the first ODP.NET version was consistently faster retrieving LOBs than other Oracle providers. The latest version of ODP.NET (and the upcoming version) have made some substantial improvements in LOB performance on top of that.

CIM Providers for C210 and ESXi

Hi,
are CIM Providers for ESXi for the C210 Series availible?
Michael

You might want to try the developer forum as well for this question.
http://developer.cisco.com/web/unifiedcomputing/forums/-/message_boards?_19_mbCategoryId=2049093

VOIP setup for the lab

Next year we are planning a VOIP migration for some of our in house users. We dont have any WAN connections and bandwidth between floors are gigabit.
What I am looking to do is buy a small setup for our lab this year so I can begin to learn about VOIP etc. So far I have researched and this is what I am considering buying.
- Cisco 2801-V/K9
- VIC2-2FX0 voice interface card
- 3560 24 port 10/100 POE standard image
- 5 7940G ip phones.
Is this a decent setup for the lab ?
Would it allow me to configure a basic voip setup and learn the fundamentals of configuring VOIP ?
Any help would be appreciated.
Cheers
Dave

Hi Dave,
You can probably get away with this for even less.
You could probably get something like a 1751-V with PVDM-256k and VIC-2FXS with the IP phones. You may need the power bricks in this scenario.
Alternatively,
CISCO2621XM with NM-2V with VIC-2FXS and the phones/bricks
But yes, your current setup will work. You would need to add something like a PVDM2-8, PVDM2-16, or PVDM2-32 for DSP resources, with the number depending on whether or not you want to play with transcoding/conferencing.
hth,
nick

VoIP Release for Nokia X6

Nokia X6 does not yet support VoIP. See here: http://wiki.forum.nokia.com/index.php/VoIP_support_in_Nokia_devices
Will there be a VoIP Release for Nokia X6 and when?

This is a user to user forum and we are unable to answer your question. Suggest you use the Contact Us link at the top of the page.

Authentication providers for TACACS+ and RADIUS

Does anyone supply WLS 8.1 authentication providers for TACACS+ and/or
RADIUS?
Ben

So in the ACS network config you add 2 NASes (or should that be NASi?)
One is of type TACACS+, enter the device ip and secret. The other is RADIUS - unless you need to use some vendor specific trickery you could stick with IETF RADIUS to keep it simple. Again enter the IP and the secret.
Assuming you a have at least 1 user in say, the default group (acs group 0) you then need to do some basic setup. In ACS a single group can have both RADIUS and TACACS+ config :-)
RADIUS will pretty much default to PPP anyway, but you should still set the Service-Type to Framed and set session timeouts etc.
With T+ you tick the boxes for the services that are allowed. For SSH login you might have to define a custom service first (under interface config)
Suggest you first take time to scan through the ACS docs.

VOIP options for business

We are currently using the free edition of Skype to make international calls. Users
top up the Skype credit by themselves and claim it later from the finance
department. Now the finance department has asked me to find out a corporate
solution so that the finance can pay a fixed amount on a “/user/month” basis
for “n” minutes of calls.
When contacted Microsoft, they asked me to purchase Office 365 E4 plan and install
Lync server at each office locations (we got 35-40 users and 4 offices around
the world) which I think a bit expensive and overkill.
Are there any simple, cloud based VOIP service providers which you are comfortable
to recommend?
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Hello,
Goto SE16 -> table TSCTFGROUP
Add the entry
APPL_NAME = CRM_1O_LOC
TIMEENTITY = M*
LENGTH      = 2 or 3 as required
DEF_FLAG leave blank
SORT_ORDER = any no which is not there like 19 or 23 or 27
Save the changes
Then goto table TSCTFGRT and add the below entries
1. LANGU = EN
2. APPL_NAME = CRM_1O_LOC
3. TIMEENTITY = M*
4. LENGTH      = 2 or 3 (which you have saved in the above table)
5. TF_TEXT   = text like " last and next 2 months"
save it.
Now goto spro and customizing, your new options will be visible there.
Hope it will solve your problem
Regards,
Shobhit

Voip application for windows phone 8.1 fails store submission

A voip application with the new 8.1 architecture based on a separate process for the voip server is not accepted by the store.
Voip architecture is based on 8.1 sample: https://code.msdn.microsoft.com/windowsapps/ChatterBox-VoIP-WP81-64921ad4
Errors during submission:
3011: The package is missing RpalManifest.xml. Update it and then try again.
1028: The native API api-ms-win-core-processthreads-l1-1-2.dll:ExitProcess() isn’t allowed in assembly doubango.BackEndServerHost.exe. Update it and then try again.

Update. I am currently working with the sample team to update the sample. We found the problem to be in the way the BackEndServerHost VIsual studio
project was created. While we work on re-creating that from scratch, testing, and re-publishing I wanted to post what we have done so far in case anyone
wants to move forward.
First there are a couple bugs in the sample, maybe you worked around those already in your development but in case not here they are.
In the backendaudio.cpp BackEndCapture::InitCapture I changed the code:
if (SUCCEEDED(hr))
WAVEFORMATEX format = {};
if (SUCCEEDED(hr))
FillPcmFormat(format, m_pwfx->nChannels, m_pwfx->nSamplesPerSec, m_pwfx->wBitsPerSample);
m_sourceFrameSizeInBytes = (format.wBitsPerSample / 8) * format.nChannels;
hr = m_pDefaultCaptureDevice->Initialize(AUDCLNT_SHAREMODE_SHARED, 0x88140000, 1000 * 10000, 0, &format, NULL);
The m_pwfx was already retrieved via GetMixFormat earlier, just use that. Don’t create a custom one.
In the BackEndAudio::Stop routine change the order of cleanup:
if (m_pDefaultRenderDevice)
m_pDefaultRenderDevice->Release();
m_pDefaultRenderDevice = NULL;
if (m_pDefaultCaptureDevice)
m_pDefaultCaptureDevice->Release();
m_pDefaultCaptureDevice = NULL;
if (m_pCaptureClient)
m_pCaptureClient->Release();
m_pCaptureClient = NULL;
The next step is to basically delete the BackEndServerHost project and create a new one with the following steps.
1) Add a new C++ Dirext X App (Windows Phone) to the solution and name it VoipBackendServerHost NOTE: using "." in the name causes problems, so don't use the same name as the original sample.
2) Remove the Common and Content Folders
3) Remove App1Main.cpp and App1Main.h
4) Contents of app.cpp should be:
#include "pch.h"
#include "App.h"
#include <windows.applicationmodel.core.h>
#include <wrl.h>
#include <string>
#include <stdexcept>
using namespace ABI::Windows::ApplicationModel::Core;
using namespace ABI::Windows::Foundation;
using namespace Microsoft::WRL;
using namespace Wrappers;
HRESULT __cdecl MyGetActivationFactory(_In_ HSTRING activatableClassId, _COM_Outptr_ IInspectable **factory);
class GetCustomClass : public RuntimeClass<RuntimeClassFlags<RuntimeClassType::WinRtClassicComMix>,
IGetActivationFactory,
CloakedIid<IAgileObject >>
public:
IFACEMETHODIMP GetActivationFactory(_In_ HSTRING activatableClassId, _COM_Outptr_ IInspectable **factory)
return MyGetActivationFactory(activatableClassId, factory);
private:
HMODULE m_hMod;
[Platform::MTAThread]
int main(Platform::Array<Platform::String^>^)
HRESULT hr = Initialize(RO_INIT_MULTITHREADED);
if (FAILED(hr))
throw std::runtime_error(std::string("Failed to Initialize(RO_INIT_MULTITHREADED), HRESULT: ").append(std::to_string(hr)));
// Scoping for smart pointers
ComPtr<ICoreApplication> spApplicationFactory;
hr = GetActivationFactory(HStringReference(RuntimeClass_Windows_ApplicationModel_Core_CoreApplication).Get(), &spApplicationFactory);
if (FAILED(hr))
throw std::runtime_error(std::string("Failed to GetActivationFactory(RuntimeClass_Windows_ApplicationModel_Core_CoreApplication), HRESULT: ").append(std::to_string(hr)));
ComPtr<IGetActivationFactory> spGetActivationFactory = Make<GetCustomClass>();
spApplicationFactory->RunWithActivationFactories(spGetActivationFactory.Get());
Uninitialize();
5) Right click and bring up Project properties. go To Linker->Input.
6) Set the Configuration and Platform dropdowns to change all configurations all platforms at the same time
7) Choose Edit for Additional Dependencies and set to this:
$(SolutionDir)$(PlatformTarget)\$(Configuration)\BackEnd\PhoneVoIPApp.BackEnd.lib
WindowsPhoneCore.lib
RuntimeObject.lib
8) Under Cofniguration Properties->General Set the Target Name to PhoneVoIP.BackEnd.HostServer and Output directory to $(SolutionDir)UI
9) APply the settings. Then click OK
10) Build the Proxy Stub
11) Build the Agents
12) Build the new Project
13) Expand the UI (Windows Phone Silverlight 8.1) Project and find the PhoneVoIP.BackEnd.HOstServer.exe and remove it.
14) Right click UI and Choose Add Existing and add the PhoneVoIP.BackEnd.HostServer
This should hopefully get you moving forward. Please test and make sure your application is working. The end result should pass WACK now. Please let me know if there are any issues. It is a lot of steps and I hope I didn't miss any.
Bret Bentzinger (MSFT) @awehellyeah

VoIP QoS for Site-to-Site Tunnel

Hi all,
I need some help with setting up QoS for VoIP between two Cisco ASA 5505 with Site-to-Site VPN.
There is no need for bandwith reservation, only DSCP 46 (EF) should be highest and DSCP 26 second highest queue and the rules should only apply to a site-to-site VPN.
Usually i try to configure the ASAs via ASDM and found out in the Cisco Documentations how to setup QoS for the DSCP bits with a Service Policy and how to set up QoS for a Site-to-Site VPN (Service Policy Rule -> Traffic Match). But how do i configure the QoS for a DSCP bit to only apply to a Site-to-Site Tunnel? And how do i configure different priorities for the two DSCP bits, is this defined by the order of Service Policies?
The QoS has to be enabled on both ASAs for the inside interface?
Thanks in advance
Tobias

Hi Collin,
ok so from the document i think this has to be added on both ASAs to prioritize DSCP 46. Could you have a quick look if this is all i need?
class-map voice_traffic
match dscp ef
class-map data
match tunnel-group <Tunnel Name>
match flow ip destination-address
policy-map voice_policy
class voice_traffic
priority
class Data
police output 200000 37500
service-policy voice_policy interface outside
But there is still the question how two configure another DSCP bit for priority 2, I could not find out how this is done, neither CLI nor ASDM. Any ideas?
BR
Tobias

Use WRP400 (VoIP Router) for Voice only, and the rest with WRT54GL

Hey there, I hope you are doing great!
The reason of this thread is because I recently moved to a cable ISP and unfortunately had to also change routers in order to take advantage of the VoIP feature (analog phone) they provided me with.
Now, the new router, the WRP400, is very limited feature-wise compared to the custom flashed WRT54GL I used to use with my DSL provider.
Now the WRT54GL does not have any FXS ports, so I obviously can't just plug my cable modem to the WRT54GL. Therefore, I was hoping to achieve a setup similar to this one:
Cable modem => VoIP Router w/ voice only (WRP400) => "Main" router (WRT54GL w/ Tomato)
Is there a way to bridge the WRP400 successfully with the WRT54GL keeping only the voice feature enabled on the VoIP router while the WRT54GL takes care of the rest? (Wireless, WAN, port forwarding, etc)
Thank you very much for your help, and have an awesome day!
Lev

I am going to provide a few snapshots of the config pages as to make this easier:
Basic setup page
Advanced Settings
Administration Page
Once more, thank you very much for the assistance!

Multiple authentication providers for the same identity store?

We are on WebLogic Server 11g PS5 and in the middle of configuring the authentication providers.
Turns out we an Active Directory instance where we have two distinct User Base DNs we would like to use, without overlap, but they share the Group Base DN.
What is the best practice to configure this? I think we could use the parent DN, but that would basically include the whole of the directory for users and groups, will that impact performance?

Hi Alexandre,
You might find this helpful - http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E10761_01/doc/oam.1014/b32420/v2authen.htm#BABJCHEJ. The text "suppose the user requests a resource that is protected by a form-based authentication scheme that redirects the user to a form with several options for logging in. When the user selects a login method on the form, he or she is again redirected, this time to a form containing a certificate-based authentication scheme." suggests that what you want to achieve is possible. If you do get this configured and working the way you want, can you please share with the forum?
-Vinod

OWSM 11g : Authentication Providers for X.509 and SAML policies

Hi All,
I am currently trying to implement the X.509 and SAML policies. As per the documentation for these polices I need to configure an authentication provider(or Identity Assertion provider) that can handle perimeter authentication via the NameCallback. I had configured an authentication provider(default authentication provider) that handled the namecallback and passwordcallback. What I can't figure out is how do these two authentication providers differs. And, incase one has to configure for the X.509 and SAML policies how to do the same.
Any pointers will be useful. Especially, from anyone who has worked and implemented the above policies.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Shomit Sahdev on ८ अप्रैल, २०१० १२:२५ पूर्वाह्न

After research by Oracle Support it actually turns out that this problem was a combination of factors:
1) some clients were effectively using an invalid certificate so it is corrrect they got an error and everything worked fine when they started using the right certificate
2) it does, however, turn out that, in the case of an error the error handling has been obfuscated in WLS 10.3.6 as compared to WLS 10.3.4 which gives a more descriptive error stating the nature of the problem (missing certificate, invalid certificate, unknown user, ...). Apparently this was deemed a security issue and has thus been replaced by a generic "internal server error". It is however possible to re-activate this older behaviour using a couple of JAVA_OPTS that you pass during server startup:
-Dweblogic.wsee.security.debug=true -Dweblogic.wsee.security.verbose=true
The above reintroduced the behaviour we had in WLS 10.3.4 and thus solves our problem!

Are there any dates for an iPhone VoIP client for VoLTE, 700MHz, band 28 ?.

Are there any dates for an iPhone VoIP client to run VoLTE, 700MHz, band 28 ?.

Not that I'm aware of.

VoIP providers for WRTP54G

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for