Wage type AMT in TCRT
Hi All,
We ran offcycle payroll later we made the run as void, But the amount in the TCRT got added to tax wage type /310,.
Please let me know the procedure.
for example in normal run for last month payroll /310 is 3000.
but when we ran the offcycle 500 got added. now we made it as void.
total in /310 has become 3500,
after void it should become 3000. It is not changing please correct me if I am wrong.
thanks
Veer
We did a void but did not run payroll again,
After running void we have to rerun payroll.
Thanks
Veer
Similar Messages
-
IT0014 wage type not processed
Hi,
When IT0014 wage type created in middle of the month say 17.07.2009 till 31.12.9999, the wage type is taken into payroll process only during next payroll period, i.e in this case it is processed only during Aug09 it is not taken into process for July09.
How to make the wage type to be processed for July09 as well???????? any settings to be made????
We also tried by spliting into two records but it still doesnt take the july09 in payroll process.
17.07.2009 to 31.07.2009 $50
01.08.2009 to 31.12.9999 $100
It works fine when the begin date of wage type is from 01st of the month.
This secenario is for an existing EE, its just that the wage type amt for this EE starts from 17.07.2009, no changes to IT0000 or IT0001. As we want to record payment period, we want to pay thru IT0014 only.
Need your valuable inputs in solving this issue......plz
Regards
Tulasithats wht iam saying
if he joins in the fist of the month it will work
if it in any mid of the month it wont ..........
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=29260836&messageID=7640892 -
Adding NSSF+Pension Fund Storing in other Wage type.
Hi Experts,
I have requirement with client.
I need to add two wage type for EE contribution and store in other Wage Type.
Find below the details:
1. 0507: NSSF Employee contribution
2. 0630: Pension Employee Contribution 5%
3. 0631: Pension Employee Contribution 7.5%
4. 0632: Pension Employee Contribution 10%
5. 9400: NSSF+Pension EE Contribution
My requirement is every month employee will contribute Pension Fund & NSSF Fund , based on the percentage he is in pension we need to add the Pension fund & NSSF fund and store in = 9400 - NSSF+Pension EE Contribution.
If employee has contributed 0630 i.e. 5% then
Add 0507 (NSSF) + 0630 (5%) and store in = 9400
else
If employee has contributed 0631 i.e. 7.5% then
Add 0507 (NSSF) + 0631 (7.5%) and store in = 9400
else
If employee has contributed 0632 i.e. 10% then
Add 0507 (NSSF) + 0632 (10%) and store in = 9400
Note:
1. Subject to the combined maximum allowable limit for NSSF and Pension Fund (KES. 20,000.00) per month
2. Pension is not part of total taxable income up to a maximum of KES. 20,000.00 per month or KES 240,000.00 per annum
Where i can store the limits for Pension Fund 20,000/-
I have not worked in PCR
Kindly assist me how can i write a PCR for this requirement.
Appreciate your early response.
Regards
RajWrite a PCR for this in the below way
WGTYP?
0507
AMT= 0507
ADDWT9400
0630
AMT= 0630
ADDWT9400
Try this logic
0507: NSSF Employee contribution
0630: Pension Employee Contribution
9400: NSSF+Pension EE Contribution
Best Regards, -
Query leaving action to make wage type amount zero
000010 D OUTWPMASSN
000020 H6
000030 N ADDWT *
000040 Y AMT=1085 RTE=0 MULTI ARAADDWT *
I am querying my action type H6 and H7 leaving action in PCR ZCC. PIT ZCCC NOAB. When i am running payroll it is giving error no rule in PCR ZCCC for ****1085 where 1085 is my wage type for which i am writing this rule so that in leavaing action amount should become zero. Can u please guide where to correc tule. Also i want to add one more action type H7 in this rule.Hi all
System is splitting the last period into two wpbp splits. One split is for period employee was with company and second split is for unemployment period during the leaving month. So whenever we write a rule or query it, then the rule is applied with ** once and leving action second time. So two different splits are there and both conditions are taken by system. so for the part of month in which leaving action has taken place like 15 to 30th then the amount is becoming zero but for the first part the system is taking ** value which is addwt *, so that amount is not beingmade zero. how can i make the period for first half as zero. -
New Loan wage type to be added in total deductions
Hi,
I have to include new wage type say as Thrift Guarantee (2440) as standard value of Re.1. When the entry is putting in IT 0045 this wage type 2440 automatically will generate. Now i want it to include in total deductions in payslip. I believe that its somewhere missing in PCR AND Schema. Cumlation class 10 tick is already there. its already included in the payslip while calculating total deduction this amount is not including in total deduction.
Can anyone guide me on this step by step.
Edited by: suresh kumar on Jun 15, 2011 5:58 AMFruther to my question i found the relevant pcr and modified the pcr in the line 180
000010 ELIMI * NEXTR A ANNUITY/INSTALLMENT
000020 A D VAKEYLNCLS
000030 A AMT=N /LIDNEXTR A INTEREST
000040 A A ADDWTN/LLBNEXTR B
000050 A B AMT=N /LEPNEXTR C EXT INST
000060 A C AMT<N /LLBZERO=&HELPADDWT&HELPSUBWTI/110SUBWTN/LLBNEXTR D
000070 A D AMT=N /LEPSUBWTN/LEPAMT=& HELPADDWTN/LEPNEXTR E
000080 A E AMT= ANRTENEXTR F ANNUITY
000090 A F AMT<N /LLBSUBWTI/110SUBWTN/LLBAMT-N /LIDADDWTN/LRP
000100 I D VAKEYLNTYP
000110 I **** AMT=N /LIDNEXTR A SUBWTI/110 INTEREST
000120 I **** A AMT=N /LEPNEXTR B EXT INST
000130 I **** B AMT<N /LLBZERO=&HELPADDWT&HELPSUBWTI/110SUBWTN/LLBNEXTR C
000140 I **** C AMT=N /LEPSUBWTN/LEPAMT=& HELPADDWTN/LEPNEXTR D
000150 I **** D AMT= TILBTNEXTR E REG INST
000160 I **** E AMT<N /LLBSUBWTI/110ADDWTN/LRPSUBWTN/LLB
000170 I 9040 AMT=N /LIDNEXTR A INTEREST
000180 I 9040 A AMT+0.25 NEXTR B INTEREST
000190 I 9040 B SUBWTI/110NEXTR C
000200 I 9040 C AMT=N /LEPNEXTR D EXT INST
000210 I 9040 D AMT<N /LLBZERO=&HELPADDWT&HELPSUBWTI/110SUBWTN/LLBNEXTR E
000220 I 9040 E AMT=N /LEPSUBWTN/LEPAMT=& HELPADDWTN/LEPNEXTR F
000230 I 9040 F AMT= TILBTNEXTR G REG INST
000240 I 9040 G AMT<N /LLBSUBWTI/110ADDWTN/LRPSUBWTN/LLB
Now i want it to consider the retro especially from march'2011 or only from previous month. How to proceed on this
Regards -
Er Job Devmt Assessmt tax (wage types /415, /615 and /715) for Tax Auth DC
When I am running payroll for an emp belonging to Tax Authority DC, wagetype /615 is being calculated correctly. However wagetype /715 is not adding up a particular wagetype amt and is thus less in amt than /615.
Wagetype /715 should be equal to /615. How do I approach this problem ? If at all there is an issue at BSI 's end, how can I zero-in on the exact problem?
N.B: I have already checked the Tax Model settings, alls fine.
Thanks And Regards,
Somdeb Banerjee.Hi Manny,
Thnx for the input. However I checked table T5UTX to see the ceiling there. The ceiling is 9000.00. However amt in RT Table for /715 wage type is much below the ceiling value i.e 1,210.51.
Amt in /615 = 1,213.47 . This diff of $ 2.96 is due to the presence of Gross-up wagetype 12SC. I have checked the Tax Model settings for DC thoroughly to see that this wagetype 12SC gets included in the taxable for Er Job Devmt Assessmt tax. And /615 is being calculated as expected in the RT Table. The problem lies with /715 !!
I am a bit confused by the presence of 2 entries for Tax Type 15 in the payroll log in Func USTAX:
Tax authority DC District Of Columbia DA01
Tax Category Tax.inc Tax-free Inc.Declare Tax.earning Tax
01 Withholding Tax (REG) 1213.47 0.00 1213.47 1213.47 57.00
10 Employer Unemployment Tax (REG) 1213.47 0.00 1213.47 1213.47 15.78
15 Er Job Devmt Assessmt Tx (REG) 2.96 0.00 2.96 2.96 0.01
15 Er Job Devmt Assessmt Tx (REG) 1210.51 0.00 1210.51 1210.51 2.42
41 Employee Disability Tax (REG) 2.96 0.00 2.96 0.00 0.00
Why are there 2 entries separately for Tax Type 15 ? The answer might be the solution to this issue.
Please help.
Thanks And Regards,
Somdeb Banerjee. -
Hello,
Can you please explain
1. What is the significance (why & when is it used) of ANSAL module in wage type configuration ?
2. How is this configured ?
Thank You,
AnthonyHi
1. What is the end result of configuring the tables mentioned above ?
> You can default the WT's and its values in IT 8 using above configuration.
2. Will the field Ann. salary in IT0008 be populated ?
> If you enter the amt in WT's field which is defaulted, ANSAL field will automatically calculates annual amts.
3. So do we use ANSAL only for generating the annual salary ? Is there any other purpose of using this
module for wage types ?
> As of past experience, i have used only for defaulting the values ie.. configuring the IT-0008 to make it easier for the enduser to enter the values.
Good Luck
Pavan
Reward Points if it is useful -
Infotype 0008 wage types are not considered while payroll
Hi Experts,
When i am running the payroll, all the wage types of infotype 0008 is not considered. Neither it is being stored in RT. But all the wage types of infotype 0014 and 0015 are correctly being considered in the payroll. Plz help
Regards
TarunHi,
Plz see the XVAL log that i am getting while running payroll. Do let me know if you need any other information. I can call you now if you say.
PIT XVAL P10 Valuate pay elements
Input
IT
Table IT
PCRlGr Wage salary type WC C1 C2 C3 Assign: AltPa CA BT Abs.
Var s. Unit Rate Number Amount
3 /806 Partial period factor 6 01
100,000.00
3 2000 BASIC SALARY-NEW 01
8,000.00
3 3000 BUS DEDUCTION-HPL 01
1,000.00-
Processing
/806 Partial period factor 6
/806 Partial period factor 6
Rule ESGPCR VaKey Operation
XVAL 3 VWTCL 10
XVAL 3 0 ADDWT *
2000 BASIC SALARY-NEW
2000 BASIC SALARY-NEW
Rule ESGPCR VaKey Operation
XVAL 3 VWTCL 10
XVAL 3 1 ELIMI *
XVAL 3 1 RESET RA
XVAL 3 1 RTE= /801
XVAL 3 1 RESET *
XVAL 3 1 MULTI RAA
XVAL 3 1 AMT/KGENAU
XVAL 3 1 ZERO= R
XVAL 3 1 ADDWT *
3000 BUS DEDUCTION-HPL
3000 BUS DEDUCTION-HPL
Rule ESGPCR VaKey Operation
XVAL 3 VWTCL 10
XVAL 3 0 ADDWT *
Output
IT
Table IT
PCRlGr Wage salary type WC C1 C2 C3 Assign: AltPa CA BT Abs.
Var s. Unit Rate Number Amount
3 /806 Partial period factor 6 01
100,000.00
3 3000 BUS DEDUCTION-HPL 01
1,000.00- -
PCR Social Security: Want to use wage type amount for comparison
Dear Guru's,
hope u'll b fine and enjoying good health. Below is PCR for social security that I hav currently configured. Its working fine. However I have another scenario to add in this PCR.
Existing PCR works on the following logic
6% of Gross pay if employee's pay less than or equal to 10,000/-.
KZPESI=10000 from T511K
KZMESI=6 from T511K
IZPESI=600 from T511P
Now i want to add another comparison. also calculate Social security for employee those hire on pay less than or equal to 10,000 but currently have salary greater than 10K. for this I'll enter Social security amount in IT0014 subtype 6004. I
ZSSM Personnal Calculation Rule ZSSM
3
6004 Social security Contrib
AMT= 0001 Set
AMT+ 0002 Addition
AMT+ 0003 Addition
AMT+ 0004 Addition
AMT+ 1001 Addition
ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
AMT?KZPESI Comparison
<
AMT*KZMESI Multiplication
AMT/100 Division
RTE=TKSOLL Set
RTE-TKAU** Subtraction
ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
ADDWT * OT Output table
=
AMT/TKDIVI Division
RTE=TKSOLL Set
RTE=TKAU** Set
MULTI ARA Multipl.amt/no/rate
AMT=IZPESI Set
ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
ADDWT * OT Output table
>
if there is a value in 0014 subtype 6004 then
AMT/TKDIVI Division
RTE=TKSOLL Set
RTE=TKAU** Set
MULTI ARA Multipl.amt/no/rate
AMT=IZPESI Set
ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
ADDWT * OT Output table
Want to know how I can use wage type amount in comparison. look at the above lines in bold where i want to apply
kindly help
Edited by: Imran on Oct 21, 2010 11:40 AMKZPESI=10000 from T511K
KZMESI=6 from T511K
IZPESI=600 from T511P
Social security wage type is 6004 and it is subtype of 0014.
ZSSM Personnal Calculation Rule ZSSM
3
6004 Social security Contrib
AMT= 0001 Set
AMT+ 0002 Addition
AMT+ 0003 Addition
AMT+ 0004 Addition
AMT+ 1001 Addition
ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
AMT?KZPESI Comparison
>
At this point I want to set another comparison based on amount in 6004.
if Amount in 6004 is > 0 then
do calculation.
hope it'll b more clear now -
PCR Social security: want to use wage type amount in decision operation
PCR Social Security: Want to use wage type amount for comparison
Posted: Oct 21, 2010 11:00 AM Reply
Dear Guru's,
hope u'll b fine and enjoying good health. Below is PCR for social security that I hav currently configured. Its working fine. However I have another scenario to add in this PCR.
Existing PCR works on the following logic
6% of Gross pay if employee's pay less than or equal to 10,000/-.
KZPESI=10000 from T511K
KZMESI=6 from T511K
IZPESI=600 from T511P
Now i want to add another comparison. also calculate Social security for employee those hire on pay less than or equal to 10,000 but currently have salary greater than 10K. for this I'll enter Social security amount in IT0014 subtype 6004. I
ZSSM Personnal Calculation Rule ZSSM
3
6004 Social security Contrib
AMT= 0001 Set
AMT+ 0002 Addition
AMT+ 0003 Addition
AMT+ 0004 Addition
AMT+ 1001 Addition
ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
AMT?KZPESI Comparison
<
AMT*KZMESI Multiplication
AMT/100 Division
RTE=TKSOLL Set
RTE-TKAU** Subtraction
ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
ADDWT * OT Output table
=
AMT/TKDIVI Division
RTE=TKSOLL Set
RTE=TKAU** Set
MULTI ARA Multipl.amt/no/rate
AMT=IZPESI Set
ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
ADDWT * OT Output table
>
if there is a value in 0014 subtype 6004 then
AMT/TKDIVI Division
RTE=TKSOLL Set
RTE=TKAU** Set
MULTI ARA Multipl.amt/no/rate
AMT=IZPESI Set
ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
ADDWT * OT Output table
Want to know how I can use wage type amount in comparison. look at the above lines in bold where i want to apply
kindly help
Edited by: Imran on Oct 21, 2010 11:40 AMYou say "if there is a value in 0014 subtype 6004 then...", so I will assume that you are talking of WT 6004 in Infotype 0014.
So, in a PCR immediately after IT0014 is processed (with function P0014 in your schema), look for WT 6004. If it exists with a number (or an amount), create a temporary variable to act as a "flag" (as in ADDWT&6004 or ADDWT&HIRE).
Then, in PCR ZSSM, you can query that temporary variable with the sequence of operations NUM=& HIRE NUM?0 (or NUM=& 6004 NUM?0 ). If the return value is =, it means that there was no IT0014 with WT 6004, and if the return value is * it means that there was. -
How to get the split period wage type amount in payslip?
How to get the split period wage type amount in payslip?
Payroll period for 01.01.09 to 31.01.09.
1. Employee is active from 1.1.09 to 10.01.09
2. Employee is inactive from 11.01.09 to 20.01.09
3. Employee is again active from 21.01.09 to 31.01.09
In Result Table three split periods are created.
From 01.01.09 to 10.01.09 u2018Basic Salaryu2019 Wtype 1101 amt is 20.00
From 11.01.09 to 20.01.09 u2018Basic Salaryu2019 Wtype 1101 amt is 00.00
From 21.01.09 to 31.01.09 u2018Basic Salaryu2019 Wtype 1101 amt is 10.00
My requirement is to print only the last split period in payslip from 21.01.09 to 31.01.09. May you please help me in this regard.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Rajesh.Hi
Try to read the below:
WPBPC : Distribute Lump Sum Wage Elements to WPBP Periods
Object
Operation
Use
Operation WPBPC distributes the amount of the current wage type to the
active WPBP periods in the payroll period.
Input
The current wage type in the header entry of table OT is used as input
for this operation.
Procedure
Within payroll, wage types are assigned to a fixed WPBP period by
infotype 0014 Recurring Payments/Deductions, for example. However, you
may want to distribute this payment to all active WPBP periods, which is
what would happen if the wage type were entered in basic pay. Therefore,
various specifications exist for parameter S:
o If the specification is 'A', and if several active WPBP periods
exist, the amount is simultaneously reduced on a calendar-day basis.
o If the specification is 'D', the wage type is distributed to all
existing WPBP periods without the amount being reduced.
o If the specification is 'S', and if the validity period starts or
ends during the period, the entry in table WPBP is split using this
date. The wage type is stored in table OT for the corresponding WPBP
period.
This parameter is only allowed if processing was accessed using
function P0014.
In this case, infotype 0014 must be processed before absence
valuation and function PARTT. Otherwise, rejections occur during
payroll processing.
o Specification 'X' is the combination of 'A' and 'S'.
This parameter is only allowed if processing was accessed using
function P0014.
o If the specification is 'W', and if the validity period starts or
ends during the period, the entry in table WPBP is split using this
date (as with option 'S'). Unlike 'S', the wage type is not stored
in table OT.
This parameter is only allowed if processing was accessed using
function P0014.
o If the specification is ' ', the wage type is stored in table OT for
each WPBP period in which the validity interval fits.
This parameter is only allowed if processing was accessed using
functions P0014 or P0015.
If the WPBP split is set for a wage type, the wage type is stored
without changes in table OT. If you specify a different wage type name
in the second parameter, the wage type is stored with this name in table
OT. Before you execute operation WPBPC, you may therefore need to delete
the split using operation ELIMI.
If a country-specific split (C1, C2, or C3 split) is set, the operation
interprets it as an error. The employee in question is rejected by
payroll. All other splits are transferred as they are.
Output
The processed wage type, or the wage type specified in the operation
call, is written to table OT (output table) with the appropriate split
indicator and reduced amount as operation output for each WPBP period.
Parameter specification 'W' is the only exception.
Syntax
OOOOOSVVVV
OOOOO WPBPC Operation name
S
blank distribute to all WPBP periods
S split and distribute WPBP
W split but do not distribute WPBP
A distribute to active WPBP periods
with calendar-day reductions
D distribute to all existing
WPBP periods
X combination of 'S' and 'A'
VVVV Results wage type
blank input wage type = results wage type
wage wage type name of input wage type is replaced
type by wage type name of results wage
name type
Wage type before operation:
Example
M100 02 3000
WPBP split
01 June 01 - June 20 active
02 June 21 - June 30 active
VVVV Results wage type
blank input wage type = results wage type
wage wage type name of input wage type is replaced
type by wage type name of results wage
name type
Wage type before operation:
Example
M100 02 3000
WPBP split
01 June 01 - June 20 active
02 June 21 - June 30 active
Wage type before operation:
WType WPBP Amount
M100 00 3000.-
M200 02 2000.-
Operation: WPBPCA
Wage type after operation:
WType WPBP Amount
M100 01 2000.-
M100 02 1000.-
M200 02 2000.-
Operation: WPBPC
Wage type after operation:
WType WPBP Amount
M100 01 3000.-
M100 02 3000.-
M200 02 2000.-
Regards
Team Member. -
Model wage type for performance pay and additional pay
Hi gurus,
my client wants performance pay and additional pay in the additional payments. I am confused what model wage types to be copied for this. i tried copying m2sf for these but the prob is if if the employee is joining in the mid of month say 15th , then if i am trying to give performane pay of 10,000 rs then it is calculating only 15 days pay n giving 5000 in the payroll n payslip.
if i try to copy the other wage types like m200,m281 n m282, i have the same problem . but if i copy m280 for both of these w.ts ,then it is giving the flat amount irrespective of the joining date of employee. but my question is does it have any implications on the calculation of the tax. coz i observed different model wage types deduct different amounts of tax. i.e if i copy m281 for performance apy n give the value as 10,000 then ,it give some x amount of tax on 10,000 similarly if i copy some other model w.t , for same amount of 10,000 it gives some other amount of tax.
im really confused ,plzz helpHi ramm,
I have checked the w.t amount in /434
/434 Total Incom 182,060.00
n my other w.t amounts are:
4MOB Mobile Reim 25,000.00
4PER Performance 15,000.00
5CEA Child Educa 193.55
5CON Conveyance 1,451.61
5HRA House Rent 4,838.71
5SPL Special All 19,354.84
/001 Valuation b01 179.90
/002 Valuation b01 179.90
/118 PTax Basis 01 75,516.13
/119 PTax Basis 01 96,774.19 35,516.13
2CAN Canteen Ded01 2,000.00-
2NOT Notice Deuc01 2,000.00-
2OTH Other Deduc01 1,500.00-
5BAS BASIC 01 9,677.42
I dont know how to check the slabs, i am new to payroll,can u guide plzz -
ISSUE in basic pay arrears wage type for new joiners
Hi Experts,
I am facing an unusual issue as after executing payroll for new joiners from previous month(example: joining date 25.01.2015 & payroll execution date:28.02.2015) results not reflecting arrears wage types of basic pay but reflects /552 wage type and /ZF5 PF arrears wage type.
But this issue is not happening in case of salary revision or other action which affects salary from retro date ie. basic pay arrears wage types are reflecting in RT table.
Already analyzed similar existing discussions in the forum.
Kindly help me to get it resolved.
Thanks & Regards
Bindu...As mentioned earlier check the parameters for payslip to bring the arrears on payslip, For your reference check the below image where similar case employee is joined in the month of January and payroll is executed in the month of Feb with arrears same wage types will appear on payslip this is standard functionality of SAP you can find out in the image with * with out * * indicates arrears.
let assume your basic pay is XXXX when arrears are there then another line appears with *XXXX indicates arrears similar to your case joined in the month of January and payroll executed in the month of February then one month arrears appear on payslip like above for each wage type.
This is completely integrated with payslip design and PC00_M40_CEDT parameters which we are using for Remuneration statement variant.
I hope you understand.
Regards
Venkatesh -
UK Payroll Issue :Gross Wage Type /101 missing from RT
Hi,
We are facing an issue for some of the employees wherein Gross wage
type /101 is not being generated when payroll is run .In place of /101 , /A01 wage type
is getting created.
This issue is being faced by employees whose claims were entered in
March ( Payroll Period 12 2008) to be paid in April ( Payroll Period 01
2009)
If anybody knows ,please let me know why its happening like that .
Thanks in advance.
AnupamaHi Surya,
Folowing is the log for employee not getting claims.
/101 Total gross 633.52
/105 Working net 475.08
/111 EE's Pensio 633.52
/121 Taxable pay 617.38
/124 Pre-tax ded 35.94-
/131 NIable pay 633.52
/132 Regular NIa 633.52
/141 Arrestable 493.78
/211 Salary relv 633.52
/212 Salary relv 653.32
/302 Employer NI 25.64
/501 Tax paid 123.60
/550 Statutory n 475.08
/552 Retro. net 18.70
/559 Bank transf 01 493.80
/560 Amount paid 493.80
/5A4 Sal.AWE bas 19.80
/5C2 Retro arstb 18.70
/5T2 Retro.taxbl 18.70
/5T4 Retro.preta 1.10-
/700 WT plus ER 659.16
/840 Diff.curr.f01 1.77
/851 Total hours 103.18
/P20 Tax-free pe 34.84
/V03 Net Pay fro V 03 0.02
/V41 ME: arrest. 0.02
/VNS ME: NI paid 25.64 2.00 653.34
/VT3 ME:Taxable 0.02
/VT4 ME:Tax Paid
9001 Local Gover 34.84
9101 Local Gover 0002 O 02 126.07
9201 LG Tax Free 34.84
9N39 Cost dist.o 0002 25.64
9NZ3 Cost dist o 0002 O 02 25.64
9P01 Cost dist.o 126.07
3 /001 Main Hourly01 62,173.06
3 /002 WTD under 501 71,026.95
3 /003 WTD over 5y01 72,617.95
3 /004 Schools Spe01 71,250.13
3 /005 Valuation b01 6.25
3 /010 Daily Rate 01 204361.29
3 /011 Daily Rate 01 204361.29
3 /012 Daily Rate 01 204361.29
3 /013 Daily Rate 01 204361.29
3 /250 Salary summ 633.52
3 /251 Basic Annua01 7,602.24
3 /252 Total Annua01 7,602.24
3 1000 Basic Pay (01 633.52
Following is the log for employee getting claims
/105 Working net 2,761.26
/111 EE's Pensio 3,166.86
/121 Taxable pay 2,028.22
/131 NIable pay 3,166.86
/133 Irregular N 3,166.86
/141 Arrestable 1,622.62
/211 Salary relv 3,166.86
/212 Salary relv 2,028.22
/501 Tax paid 405.60
/550 Statutory n 2,761.26
/551 Stat.net re 3,166.86-
/552 Retro. net 2,028.22
/553 Recalc.diff 3,166.86-
/5A1 Sal.AWE bas 1.00
/5A3 Sal.AWE bas 3,166.86-
/5A4 Sal.AWE bas 2,028.22
/5C1 Arstble ern 3,166.86-
/5C2 Retro arstb 2,028.22
/5T1 Txbl.pay re 3,166.86-
/5T2 Retro.taxbl 2,028.22
/700 WT plus ER 3,166.86
/840 Diff.curr.f01 2.80
/851 Total hours 162.80
/A01 Total gross 3,166.86
/V01 Net Pay on 1,622.62
3 /001 Main Hourly01 190940.93
3 /002 WTD under 501 218132.27
3 /001 Main Hourly01 190940.93
3 /002 WTD under 501 218132.27
3 /003 WTD over 5y01 223018.42
3 /004 Schools Spe01 218817.70
3 /005 Valuation b01 19.19
3 /010 Daily Rate 01 990267.74
3 /011 Daily Rate 01 990267.74
3 /012 Daily Rate 01 990267.74
3 /013 Daily Rate 01 990267.74
3 /250 Salary summ 3,069.83
3 /251 Basic Annua01 36,837.96
3 /252 Total Annua01 36,837.96
3 1270 Notional Ba01 3,069.83
3 3715 Claim WTD >01 223018.42 142.00 3,166.86
I have also got this info.
Retroaction and End of Year
Purpose
If you need to use retroaction over end of year, for example when overtime entered in period 12 is to be paid in period 1, or backdated pay increases applied in the new tax year are to start in the previous tax year, you can do this without this changing any statutory balances in the previous tax year.
Process Flow
If you make any changes over end of year that trigger retroaction, this will not affect the statutory balances in the previous tax year.
However, a change that affects total gross, for example, will be recorded and summed into a wage type called /A01 (Total Gross). The /A01 value will feed a wage type called /Z01 (Total Gross), which will be passed across to the new tax year, ensuring that any retro differences will only affect statutory cumulatives in the new tax year, but will not compromise period 12 statutory cumulatives that may already have been used for end of year reporting.
The following wage types were introduced to enable retroaction over end of year:
u2022 /A01
u2022 /A12
u2022 /AMP
u2022 /AP0
u2022 /AP1
u2022 /ASP
u2022 /Z01
u2022 /Z12
u2022 /ZMP
u2022 /ZP0
u2022 /ZP1
u2022 /ZSP
Thanks and Regards,
Anupama -
UK Payroll Issue : Tax Adjustment Wage Type E501
Hi,
We are facing an issue when inputting Tax adjustment wage type E501 to adjust previous year's tax retroactively.
When we enter wage type E501 with tax adjustment amount in IT0015 for the period 12 2008 ( March) and run payroll for current period ( May 2009) The remuneration Statement shows weird results.
For example :
For an employee we entered Wagetype E501 with amount +£20.00 with a date of 31/3/09 in May. The pay has been calculated and the tax due to be deducted in May is £568.60. The payslip shows £588.60 (£568.60 + -£20.00) and it also shows £588.60 for a retrospective pay period (*) this figure should not appear at all. Again the payslip does not balance but it would if the correct tax amount of £568.60 only showed on the payslip.
E501 is purely an adjustment to the Year to Date cumulatives it is not a deduction (or refund) to the employee and therefore should not affect the payslip.
UK Payroll gurus please help me sort out this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
AnupamaHi Surya,
Thanks for the reply.
I have checked and found out that subschema ZNTO ( GNTO) contains ZEOY(GEOY) and this is how it looks. Please let me know if any changes are to be made to the PCR .
ZEOY Adjustment to results table RT
E101 /101 adjustment
E112 /112 adjustment
E121 /121 adjustment
E501 /501 adjustment
ADDWTE* RT Results table
ADDWTE/501 RT Results table
E505 /505 adjustment
E506 /506 adjustment
ECSL /CSL EOY Adjustment
EP20 /P20 adjustment
EP21 /P21 adjustment
ESPY /SPY adjustment
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Anupama
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi, I am Implementing SAP in Cement Industry, I have some Excise related quiery which I am describing below. Capitive Consumption of Clinker for grinding mill on which 110% of Production Cost Excise duty is Calculated and Excemtion is taken. Simila
-
Finding the shortest path router for the router tracking purpose
Hi all, A Question asking you regarding to routers' tracking information. We keeps all the router infomation of our subnet in a file name "routers.txt" in this format: 1 2 1 2 4 1 4 3 1 1 3 5 This states there are four routers, the distance between r
-
Upgraded to SL - phpMyAdmin-3.2.1 : PHP cannot load mcrypt extension
after upgrade to SL, I run phpMyAdmin-3.2.1, and PHP 5.3.0 (in SL) I get this message in phpMyAdmin : cannot load mcrypt extension ; check the PHP config ... what could be wrong with the OS X version of PHP 3.0 ? thanks for your lights erwin
-
Hi Experts, i have a VC application which display Sales Order Information based on the Customer, Material & Sales Organization. There are two buttons submit & reset everything works fine. Now i wish to add new button validate with custom event li
-
Hi I am trying to get some images (10 frames per second) from a webcam so that later I can detect the moving objects.. My code is the following but I dont know how to change it so that I can get 10 frames per second.Any help? package video; import ja