Want to use transaction type

Hi,
  Enter another transaction type (Transaction type . does not exist)
Message no. AA816
Diagnosis
According to your entry or specification, you want to use transaction type .. However, this transaction type has not been defined.
Procedure
Check the if transaction type . is defined in FI-AA Customizing.

wat are u trying to do? nature of transaction?
which transaction code are u using? and
which transaction type u used?

Similar Messages

  • PCR Social security: want to use wage type amount in decision operation

    PCR Social Security: Want to use wage type amount for comparison  
    Posted: Oct 21, 2010 11:00 AM                                  Reply
    Dear Guru's,
    hope u'll b fine and enjoying good health. Below is PCR for social security that I hav currently configured. Its working fine. However I have another scenario to add in this PCR.
    Existing PCR works on the following logic
    6% of Gross pay if employee's pay less than or equal to 10,000/-.
    KZPESI=10000 from T511K
    KZMESI=6 from T511K
    IZPESI=600 from T511P
    Now i want to add another comparison. also calculate Social security for employee those hire on pay less than or equal to 10,000 but currently have salary greater than 10K. for this I'll enter Social security amount in IT0014 subtype 6004. I
    ZSSM Personnal Calculation Rule ZSSM
    3
    6004 Social security Contrib
    AMT= 0001 Set
    AMT+ 0002 Addition
    AMT+ 0003 Addition
    AMT+ 0004 Addition
    AMT+ 1001 Addition
    ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
    AMT?KZPESI Comparison
    <
    AMT*KZMESI Multiplication
    AMT/100 Division
    RTE=TKSOLL Set
    RTE-TKAU** Subtraction
    ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
    ADDWT * OT Output table
    =
    AMT/TKDIVI Division
    RTE=TKSOLL Set
    RTE=TKAU** Set
    MULTI ARA Multipl.amt/no/rate
    AMT=IZPESI Set
    ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
    ADDWT * OT Output table
    >
    if there is a value in 0014 subtype 6004 then
    AMT/TKDIVI Division
    RTE=TKSOLL Set
    RTE=TKAU** Set
    MULTI ARA Multipl.amt/no/rate
    AMT=IZPESI Set
    ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
    ADDWT * OT Output table
    Want to know how I can use wage type amount in comparison. look at the above lines in bold where i want to apply
    kindly help
    Edited by: Imran on Oct 21, 2010 11:40 AM

    You say "if there is a value in 0014 subtype 6004 then...", so I will assume that you are talking of WT 6004 in Infotype 0014.
    So, in a PCR immediately after IT0014 is processed (with function P0014 in your schema), look for WT 6004.  If it exists with a number (or an amount), create a temporary variable to act as a "flag"  (as in ADDWT&6004 or ADDWT&HIRE).
    Then, in PCR ZSSM, you can query that temporary variable with the sequence of operations NUM=& HIRE NUM?0 (or NUM=& 6004 NUM?0 ). If the return value is =, it means that there was no IT0014 with WT 6004, and if the return value is * it means that there was.

  • Acquisition error: can't use transaction type

    I want to use F-91or other t-code to post asset acquisition, my requirement and expected entry is as follows:
    (1)Dr: Asset 1000
    Cr: accumulated depreciation 300(including prior year accumlated depreciation 200, and current year 100)
    Cr: AP vendor-intercompany 700
    (2). in asset explorer, it should have ordinary depreciation , fiscal year start 200, change 100
    I go to AO73 and define a transaction type Z01,using gross method, but when i use F-91, error is below:
    You cannot post with transaction type Z01 here
    Message no. AA495
    Diagnosis
    The transaction type used (Z01) specifies the posting of an acquisition to the asset with the depreciation that has already accrued on the acquisition and production costs.  This type of posting is not possible with the current transaction.
    System Response
    The transaction type is rejected.
    so how to post to AP?  also in ABSO, I can't post to AP vendor account and accumulated depreciation 300 go to value adjustment line in explorer, this is not I wanted, any solution? thanks

    Are you scanning from MP Navigator or ImageCapture?
    on the 10.9 or 10.10 computers I'd download the ICA driver and the Scanner driver, along with the latest version of MP Navigator from the website and install them, then reboot.
    http://usa.canon.com/cusa/support/consumer/scanners/canoscan_series/canoscan_lide210#DriversAndSoftware
    Try to scan using MP Navigator. If you get the error, close MP Navigator and try to scan using ImageCapture. Do you still get the error?
    I'm not including suggestions for El Capitan because there aren't drivers available for it yet, so I wouldnt expect it to work.

  • Using Transaction type

    Hi
    Our app's code is in core java and we do not use EJB. I am implementing a common functionality that will be used to log errors into a database table. In case of a failure condition all others database writes other than the error log entry should be rolled back .
    I was wondering if there is something like the transaction type (require_new) in EJB in core java that I can use to make the call to the logging function as a seperate transaction. Or can I accomplish it by using EJB as a wrapper (I am still reading on how to use EJB just as a wrapper).
    Any help or direction would be appreciated.
    Thanks

    Hi parvin,
    In EJB, the way this is typically done is by declaring a separate business method with tx attribute TX_REQUIRES_NEW that performs the transactional operation you want to be done indepdent of the other work. When this method is called its work will be executed within a new transaction and then committed. When control returns to the 1st method its transaction will be resumed. Then, the work performed there will either commit or rollback accordingly.
    For this kind of application your best bet is to use Java EE rather than Java SE. There's nothing in the core Java SE API that is the equivalent of EJB tx attributes or JTA distributed transactions. There are other Java based frameworks such as Spring that have similar functionality, but I haven't used them so I can't speak to the details.
    --ken                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • PCR Social Security: Want to use wage type amount for comparison

    Dear Guru's,
    hope u'll b fine and enjoying good health.  Below is PCR for social security that I hav currently configured. Its working fine. However I have another scenario to add in this PCR. 
    Existing PCR works on the following logic
    6% of Gross pay if employee's pay less than or equal to 10,000/-.
    KZPESI=10000 from T511K
    KZMESI=6        from T511K
    IZPESI=600      from T511P
    Now i want to add another comparison. also calculate Social security for employee those hire on pay less than or equal to 10,000 but currently have salary greater than 10K. for this I'll enter Social security amount in IT0014 subtype 6004.  I
    ZSSM Personnal Calculation Rule ZSSM
        3
          6004 Social security Contrib
            AMT=  0001 Set
            AMT+  0002 Addition
            AMT+  0003 Addition
            AMT+  0004 Addition
            AMT+  1001 Addition
            ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
            AMT?KZPESI Comparison
              <
                AMT*KZMESI Multiplication
                AMT/100    Division
                RTE=TKSOLL Set
                RTE-TKAU** Subtraction
                ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
                ADDWT *    OT   Output table
              =
                AMT/TKDIVI Division
                RTE=TKSOLL Set
                RTE=TKAU** Set
                MULTI ARA  Multipl.amt/no/rate
                AMT=IZPESI Set
                ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
                ADDWT *    OT   Output table
            >
              if there is a value in 0014 subtype 6004 then
                      AMT/TKDIVI Division
                       RTE=TKSOLL Set
                       RTE=TKAU** Set
                       MULTI ARA  Multipl.amt/no/rate
                      AMT=IZPESI Set
                      ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
                      ADDWT *    OT   Output table
      Want to know how I can use wage type amount in comparison. look at the above lines in bold where i want to apply
    kindly help
    Edited by: Imran on Oct 21, 2010 11:40 AM

    KZPESI=10000 from T511K
    KZMESI=6 from T511K
    IZPESI=600 from T511P
    Social security wage type is 6004 and it is subtype of 0014.
    ZSSM Personnal Calculation Rule ZSSM
    3
    6004 Social security Contrib
    AMT= 0001 Set
    AMT+ 0002 Addition
    AMT+ 0003 Addition
    AMT+ 0004 Addition
    AMT+ 1001 Addition
    ROUNDGK100 Round AMT to next
    AMT?KZPESI Comparison
    >
    At this point I want to set another comparison based on amount in 6004.
    if Amount in 6004 is > 0 then
       do calculation.
    hope it'll b more clear now

  • Partner Determination using Transaction Type in Org Model

    Hi Experts,
    I am a functional consultant working on CRM 5.0 and currently customizing the partner determination procedure for transaction Lead. As per the business requirement, for all the leads created by default the system should determine a Lead Qualifier in the transaction Lead. In order to achieve this I am using rule 14000146 Orgman_14 which provides org unit for a transaction type. In the org model I am having a org unit defined as "Lead Management Dept" as well as I have created and assigned position Lead Qualifier and assigned emp to this position too. Now I have defined the sales attributes for this Org Unit "Lead Management Dept" and for the sales attribute "Transaction Type" filled in value as Y001 which is my transaction type for Lead.
    The issue is that this defined attribute is not inherited by the position although this position is assigned to the above mentioned Org Unit and therefore the partner is not getting determined in the transaction. Can someone provide guidance about this issue? How to inherit this attribute to position so that the position is determined in the PDP? or any other alternative for this situation??
    Thnaks and regards
    Ambar Adhav

    Hi,
    Try transaction OOATTRCUST, scenario SALE> Attributes/Scenarios:
    For PROC_TYPE attribute try to change the Inherit.Type and see how the system behaves.
    Regards,
    Susana Messias

  • Hi i want to use boolean type in a procedure as out parameter !!

    Hi
    I need to use Boolean type as out parameter in my procedure which return true if the SELECT query in procedure returns any row otherwise it should return false
    please HELP !!

    I need to use Boolean type as out parameter in my procedure which return true if the SELECT query in procedure returns any row otherwise it should return false
    Sounds like basic PL/SQL stuff.
    What problem are you experiencing?
    Are you looking for something like this?
    create or replace procedure check_emp (p_empno in number, p_result out boolean) is
      dummy  pls_integer;
    begin
      select 1
      into dummy
      from scott.emp
      where empno = p_empno;
      p_result := true;
    exception
      when no_data_found then
        p_result := false;
    end;
    SQL> declare
      2    emp_exists  boolean;
      3  begin
      4    check_emp(7839, emp_exists);
      5    if emp_exists then
      6      dbms_output.put_line('Employee exists');
      7    else
      8      dbms_output.put_line('Employee does not exist');
      9    end if;
    10  end;
    11  /
    Employee exists
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed

  • Transaction Type is 922 does not exist

    Hi,
    While posting FI document I am getting below error message :
    Error: Enter another transaction type (Transaction type 922 does not exist)
    Message no. AA816
    Diagnosis:
    According to your entry or specification, you want to use transaction type 922. However, this transaction type has not been defined.
    Procedure:
    Check the if transaction type 922 is defined in FI-AA Customizing
    Please advise how can I rectify this issue!
    Regards
    VS Rao

    Hi VS Rao
    Seems you used TT.922 in T-cd: OAYT but somehow you deleted  TT.922 afterwards. You can either delete the setting of TT.922 from T-cd: OAYT or simply redefine the TT.922 accordingly if any necessary.
    Best regards
    George

  • Transaction type to be used for revaluation

    Hi Sir,
    Question is how to revaluate the asset.
    1.  In oabw, oayr and in ao90 I checked and the posting of gross revaluation in abaw Tty 800 is posted.
    2. It is shown in aw01n.
    Till here It is fine, after that What I need to do.
    Pl Suggest different scenarios.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    You have been using manual revaluation, please go through following documnetation which will help you to understand. (If you have defined separate depreciation area for revaluation then such area post APC values periodically) or you are using existing depreciation area which post APC values periodically then you need to run periodic posting to post values in FI. IF APC values are being posted realtime for the area which is being revaluated e.g. area 01 then you have already done all activity and not required to do anything else.
    Manual Planning
    If you choose to plan revaluation manually, the revaluation report can still be used to create the depreciation areas required for the individual assets. If you choose, the report does not create a posting session in that case. For planning, use transaction type Rxx (xx = key of the revaluation). The system automatically creates this transaction type when you define the revaluation.
    If you want to post gross revaluation, that is, with the revaluation of historical depreciation (backlog calculation), use transaction type 800. Transaction type 800 is defined in the standard system so that it posts to all depreciation areas that allow for revaluation and backlog calculation in their Customizing definitions. If you want to limit the posting of gross revaluation only to specific depreciation areas, you have to change the Customizing definition of transaction type 800 accordingly (function Areas). Or copy transaction type 800 and change the copy.
    In this instance also, FI documents are not created until the periodic posting of the depreciation area to Financial Accounting is carried out.
    Thanks!!!
    Murlidhar Khatri

  • Transaction type used for FA posting to depreciation area 01 (ordinary dep)

    Hi Expert,
    There is a difference between my ordinary dep area 01 and book dep area 03.
    area 01 is having a USD100
    area 03 is having zero USD
    I need to zerolized area 01.
    I have created a new TTY and limit the dep area posting to 01 in OAYA. However, when I tried to post via ABZE, it is giving me an error message AA350.
    Diagnosis
    According to Table T093A, if you use transaction type 050, area 03 has to adopt values from area 01 (chart of depreciation TPGL). However, the specifications made in Table TABWA for the two areas do not agree.
    Procedure
    Maintain the transaction type using the Customizing menu. Both areas have to have either the indicator 'propose for posting' or 'has to be posted'.
    I have checked both tables and it is not allowing me to post to area 01 only. I have done this before by creating a new TTY and post to area 02 and it works.
    Please advise soon how to rectify this.
    Thanks.
    Angel.

    Hi,
    please check ion OABC if area 02 takes over the values identically.
    regards Bernhard

  • Cross server asset transaction type

    we have about 30 old asset in company code A, we want to transfer these assets to company code B(in another SAP server), we don't want to use SAP standard inter-company transfer or IDOC, ALE
    my question 1 is: which tables to download APC value, net book value and accumulated depreciation per depreciation area and asset class respectifully?
    is there any table stored plan depreciation for month Aug, Sep, this year per asset and per depreciation area?
    we want to customize transaction type, and post journal voucher for company code B, any one know the T-code to define this kind of transaction type,
    my question 2 is: do we need to design two such transaction type, one for prior year acquired asset, the other for current year asset? 
    if the above is correct, do we use ABSO or F-02 or FB01?

    Hi,
    For question 2, usually there is no need to design a new transaction type unless it is not available in existing setting. As for question 3, those transaction type if not available can be set up using AO73 and applicable for used by either F-02 or ABSO.
    Kind regards,
    John Chin

  • Settlement Transaction type problem

    Gurus,
    We currently use CJ88 to settle to AUCs to Fixed assets for US Projects. SAP internally uses transaction types 331/336 while posting this settlement and values are settled to all depreciation areas. Now, we are implementing for Mexico where they want only select depreciation areas to post acquisition costs. I created custom transaction types for 331/336 for the select transaction types.
    But the question is how do I make CJ88 to select 331/336 for US and the custom Ttypes for Mexico.
    Any suggestions will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Alen

    Hi Bernhard,
    Could you elaborate what your proposed solution is?
    I welcome other too to take a shot at this.
    Thanks,
    Alen

  • CHARM_CREATE and transaction type ZDCR

    Hello,
    We configured ChaRM and want to use transaction "CHARM_CREATE" for creating new change requests.
    But this transaction uses apparently still the SDCR transaction type.
    Is there a possibility to customize this transaction "CHARM_CREATE" with my transaction type ZDCR? And can I also decide which fields (e.g. partner schemas) should be displayed?
    Thanks in advance.
    Kind regards,
    Geraldine

    Hello,
    i have seen in some support messages that CHARM_CREATE is obsolete, but I have seen no documentation about this.
    As of Solution Manager 7.1, the SAP GUI interface is abandoned in favour of the Work Centers, meaning that CHARM_CREATE will then 100% sure be obsolete.
    Best regards,
    Miguel Ariñ

  • Excise Transaction Types

    Dear Gurus,
    What is the importance of the step " Specify Excise accounts per excise transaction" ?
    As there are many excise transaction type defined , i wanted to know when do all these transaction types comes in picture?
    How system select them automatically and what is the importance of them from the perspective of MM and FI?
    What are the factors on which the appropriate selection of these transaction type is depend upon?
    Best Regards,
    Ashutosh

    Hi
    Hope the following will be hepfull
    Subtransaction types
    CIN uses transaction type as a way of differentiating between the various excise related processes. They are:
    GRPO – Goods receipt for purchase order in Plant. Also used in Depot for a PO and material document
    EWPO – Excise invoice without purchase order
    57FC      -  Subcontracting Challan
    57NR – Reversal  and Recredit for Subcontracting Challan
    CAPE-  Capital Goods credit accounts
    OTHR- Excise Invoice for Other Movements
    DLFC- Factory Sale and Stock Transfer via SD
    CEIV- Cancellation of Generated Excise Invoice
    DIEX- Differential Excise Invoice Credit
    MRDY- Excise Duty reversal without reference
    MRRD- Excise Duty reversal if material used for non-production
    MRWO- Excise Duty Reversal for Write off Cases
    TR6C - PLA account adjustment through TR6 Challan
    UTLZ- is used for determining the accounts when a JV is posted with an option of fortnightly payment
    The Transaction type that are not used : 57CM, 57GR, CAGI, CAGR, GRTR.
    Regards
    Gopal SP

  • Organtisational data determination for transaction type

    Hi!
    We are implementing the organizational data determination.
    The idea is to fix a specific org unit for several transaction types, because they will always use this unit.
    In order to achieve this, we have implemented Org data determination with rule 14000146, Org. Unit Using Transaction Type.
    Within the rule, in tab Container, I could assign 1 transaction type. How can I define more? And where do I determine the Org Unit it the  rule should determine?
    Best regards,
    Cristina

    hi Cristina
    you need to enhance that rule
    just copy the rule to Z rule and then create containers specifying the different transaction type in the same way the original transaction is there,
    else you need not do this because it is the standard behavior of rule,for every transaction type u just assign the org data profile,it will work the way u want from  this
    and regarding ur question"where do I determine the Org Unit it the rule should determine"
    the rule will automatically determine the org unit,because inside the container the org attributes are used, its like
    IN PPOMA_CRM, choose your Organization Unit, Go to tab Attributes, Choose Attribute Maintaineance Scenario as SALES, and below you will be able to view Attribute Transaction Type.
    i believe u r using rule for org model
    best regards
    ashish

Maybe you are looking for