Partner Determination using Transaction Type in Org Model

Hi Experts,
I am a functional consultant working on CRM 5.0 and currently customizing the partner determination procedure for transaction Lead. As per the business requirement, for all the leads created by default the system should determine a Lead Qualifier in the transaction Lead. In order to achieve this I am using rule 14000146 Orgman_14 which provides org unit for a transaction type. In the org model I am having a org unit defined as "Lead Management Dept" as well as I have created and assigned position Lead Qualifier and assigned emp to this position too. Now I have defined the sales attributes for this Org Unit "Lead Management Dept" and for the sales attribute "Transaction Type" filled in value as Y001 which is my transaction type for Lead.
The issue is that this defined attribute is not inherited by the position although this position is assigned to the above mentioned Org Unit and therefore the partner is not getting determined in the transaction. Can someone provide guidance about this issue? How to inherit this attribute to position so that the position is determined in the PDP? or any other alternative for this situation??
Thnaks and regards
Ambar Adhav

Hi,
Try transaction OOATTRCUST, scenario SALE> Attributes/Scenarios:
For PROC_TYPE attribute try to change the Inherit.Type and see how the system behaves.
Regards,
Susana Messias

Similar Messages

Organtisational data determination for transaction type

Hi!
We are implementing the organizational data determination.
The idea is to fix a specific org unit for several transaction types, because they will always use this unit.
In order to achieve this, we have implemented Org data determination with rule 14000146, Org. Unit Using Transaction Type.
Within the rule, in tab Container, I could assign 1 transaction type. How can I define more? And where do I determine the Org Unit it the rule should determine?
Best regards,
Cristina

hi Cristina
you need to enhance that rule
just copy the rule to Z rule and then create containers specifying the different transaction type in the same way the original transaction is there,
else you need not do this because it is the standard behavior of rule,for every transaction type u just assign the org data profile,it will work the way u want from this
and regarding ur question"where do I determine the Org Unit it the rule should determine"
the rule will automatically determine the org unit,because inside the container the org attributes are used, its like
IN PPOMA_CRM, choose your Organization Unit, Go to tab Attributes, Choose Attribute Maintaineance Scenario as SALES, and below you will be able to view Attribute Transaction Type.
i believe u r using rule for org model
best regards
ashish

Want to use transaction type

Hi,
Enter another transaction type (Transaction type . does not exist)
Message no. AA816
Diagnosis
According to your entry or specification, you want to use transaction type .. However, this transaction type has not been defined.
Procedure
Check the if transaction type . is defined in FI-AA Customizing.

wat are u trying to do? nature of transaction?
which transaction code are u using? and
which transaction type u used?

How to determine the transaction type?

Hello,
I have a requirement to disable the user when the role string field on the usr form is empty. I set up a post update entity adapter to do that and it works fine.
When I want to enable the user using the Enable button, the above post update entity adapter detects that the role string field is empty and the user is Active, it disables the user right back.
So, I need to set up a pre-update entity adapter that can detect the type of transaction. If the transaction is to Enable the Xellerate User, then I will update the role string to a dummy value (as long as it's not empty) so that the Disable adapter doesn't get fired.
Is this possible to do? Where can I find the transaction type information for a given Object?
Thanks
Khanh

Thanks
This is the information that i got :
java version "1.4.2_07"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_07
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_07-b05, mixed mode)
from this i could make out that the jvm is client version,, but how do i determine which vendor has provided the jvm .

PARTNER DETERMINATION USING STANDARD RULE ORGUNIT EMPLOYEE

HELLO FRIENDS,
We are using a standard (orgunit employee) rule for partner determination. the description is as follows:
hierarchy:
CIRCLE -> BRANCHES
the employee stated above comes under the circle but creates leads for all the branches.
The PDP goes as follows:
user (employee stated above) enters branch -> branch determines circle through responsibility rules and the employee automatically determines the employee.
the PDP works fine for users of earlier created circles but now we are creating new circles and new position for these employees in a similar manner and the PDP gives the error enter employee (even though the circle is determined).
Please let me know if there are some parameters that we are missing or some technical issues that need to be taken care of while using the standard (orgunit employee) rule.
Thanks and regards
Nitin Sehgal

Hello Nitin,
Did you create an employee record for the User. If you create an employee did you assign the user id for that employee.
Check this assignment.
Thanks
Raja Pamireddy
CRM Marketing Forum Moderator.

Acquisition error: can't use transaction type

I want to use F-91or other t-code to post asset acquisition, my requirement and expected entry is as follows:
(1)Dr: Asset 1000
Cr: accumulated depreciation 300(including prior year accumlated depreciation 200, and current year 100)
Cr: AP vendor-intercompany 700
(2). in asset explorer, it should have ordinary depreciation , fiscal year start 200, change 100
I go to AO73 and define a transaction type Z01,using gross method, but when i use F-91, error is below:
You cannot post with transaction type Z01 here
Message no. AA495
Diagnosis
The transaction type used (Z01) specifies the posting of an acquisition to the asset with the depreciation that has already accrued on the acquisition and production costs. This type of posting is not possible with the current transaction.
System Response
The transaction type is rejected.
so how to post to AP? also in ABSO, I can't post to AP vendor account and accumulated depreciation 300 go to value adjustment line in explorer, this is not I wanted, any solution? thanks

Are you scanning from MP Navigator or ImageCapture?
on the 10.9 or 10.10 computers I'd download the ICA driver and the Scanner driver, along with the latest version of MP Navigator from the website and install them, then reboot.
http://usa.canon.com/cusa/support/consumer/scanners/canoscan_series/canoscan_lide210#DriversAndSoftware
Try to scan using MP Navigator. If you get the error, close MP Navigator and try to scan using ImageCapture. Do you still get the error?
I'm not including suggestions for El Capitan because there aren't drivers available for it yet, so I wouldnt expect it to work.

Using Transaction type

Hi
Our app's code is in core java and we do not use EJB. I am implementing a common functionality that will be used to log errors into a database table. In case of a failure condition all others database writes other than the error log entry should be rolled back .
I was wondering if there is something like the transaction type (require_new) in EJB in core java that I can use to make the call to the logging function as a seperate transaction. Or can I accomplish it by using EJB as a wrapper (I am still reading on how to use EJB just as a wrapper).
Any help or direction would be appreciated.
Thanks

Hi parvin,
In EJB, the way this is typically done is by declaring a separate business method with tx attribute TX_REQUIRES_NEW that performs the transactional operation you want to be done indepdent of the other work. When this method is called its work will be executed within a new transaction and then committed. When control returns to the 1st method its transaction will be resumed. Then, the work performed there will either commit or rollback accordingly.
For this kind of application your best bet is to use Java EE rather than Java SE. There's nothing in the core Java SE API that is the equivalent of EJB tx attributes or JTA distributed transactions. There are other Java based frameworks such as Spring that have similar functionality, but I haven't used them so I can't speak to the details.
--ken

Extends collection using generic type of org.w3c.dom.Element

Hi, all.
I am trying to extending collection using PriorityBlockingQueue.
Extended queue is generic type of org.w3c.dom.Element.
public class MyQueue<Element> extends PriorityBlockingQueue<Element> {***/}
Compiler misunderstand to type of Element (as like E ?, not org.w3c.dom.Element), then methods in the code "this.peek ()" will be error reported by type difference.
At fact, I tried it into MyQueue<Node> extends PriorityBlockingQueue<Node>, it not causes any misunderstanding.
Is there any hack to indicates that the type is org.w3c.dom.Element ? This mean, MyQueue<org.w3c.dom.Element> extends PriorityBlockingQueue<org.w3c.dom.Element>...
Thanks.

public class MyQueue extends PriorityBlockingQueue<org.w3c.dom.Element>

Two way Partner determination using BP relationship

HI,
I have a simple requirement however i am not able to acheive it.
There are two partner functions X and Y, and a relationship type Parent-Child
Now if BP 1 is a parent of BP 2 , then when we enter BP 1 in any transaction BP 2 should be determined by the system.
and vice versa.. how to acheive this?
i tried a lot and now i am able to determine BP 2 from BP 1 , but the reverse is not working for me.
Regards,
PP

Hello Prajit,
Could you tell me how did you solved this issue?
I have the same problem, when I used partner 1 y can find partner 2 (as they are stored in BUT050). But using partner 2 I can´t find partner 1.
Thanks

Using Dictinary types of a Model in the added DC

Hi all,
I have created a new development component. In this DC I have added another DC as used DC in order to use its public web dynpro component.
This added DC belongs to another software component. That is this DC belongs to another package as my DC.
The question is if i can use the dictionary types that belong to the added DC. This uses a Model and i want to make use of these Dictionary types provided by the model.
Is this possible?
Looking forward for help....
Regards,
Nada

Hi Nada,
As Model is not a part of component so it does not get exposed when you expose component thus like the way you have exposed component to be used across DC boundaries you also have to expose Model as well as Dictionary elements as separate public part(s).
regards
dhawal

Date Determination using Date Types and Date Rules

Hi Friends,
Iam working on Date Management in CRM 7.0
I have a requirement where I need to calculate the generate the Billing Date present in the Billing Plan tab of the Service Contract.
I have gone through few of the Date Rules defined in the system. My requirement is to subtract the number of days from the Settlement Start Date and populate this Billing Date. It is clear from the existing date rules that we can subtract the days from Settlement Start Date. But I have a new Z field that is created using EEWB, in which user will enter the number of days. Now I need to subtract these days from Settlement Start Date. So, how can I get the reference of this new field. How can I subtract the number of days that the user will enter in this new Z field.
Thanks & regards,
Raju

Hello Robert
I am currently working on service request.I am facing a problem in the date management there.In my service request i have 5 statuses .One of my status is "Pending with consumer".I am using duration settings of service request.By duration settings , i am calculating the duration for which its pending with consumer.I am having 2 response profile one is 24*7 and other is having 9 working hours.In the service request from the SLA configuration i am calculating the escalation date & Time .I need to add the pending with consumer duration with the escalation date and time.I am facing a problem , i am explaining whole problem ..
Let say if the pending with consumer duration is 1440 minutes(that is 24 hours) .I am adding the minutes to the escalation date through the date rule.
I am facing problem that if the service profile is 24*7 then there is no problem but if it is having the 9 hours working service profile then after adding the minutes to it the escalation date is changing to 4 days ahead which is wrong.
I need to add only those minutes for which it is pending with consumer in working hours for the 9 hours service profile
I need to dynamically determine the working hours from the duration then add it to escalation dates when the status is changed from pending with consumer.
Please suggest a badi will work or how to do it.Its urgent as i need to give demo.I will appreciate a quick reply.Please reply

Problem with ORG Determination in Transactions

I am having an issue with ORG determination in Business Transactions
The Organization area is not being populated as required.
I want to pull in the org data from the User (Org data set in Sales Area section of the BP), all users have the same org data, when running the transaction this is not working, this used to work ok but no longer does??
Settings in org data profile is set to '14000146 - Org. Unit Using Transaction Type', this brings back two errors:
1 - No organizational units found
2 - No organizational unit could be selected
I have tried using the 10000194 - UserOrgUnit but this causes a pricing determination error relating to config
any ideas anyone??
regards
Barry

Hello Barry,
To use rule 14000146, you need to add the used transaction type as an attribute of the org. unit that you want it to be determined.
To do this, please execute t-cd ppoma_crm, open your org. unit, go to the [Attributes] tab, add the transaction type into the 'Transaction Type' attibute, then check on 'Obj. permitted in determination' save.
Wiith rule 10000194 you got the org. unit determined. For the pricing error, I think it might be related to the pricing procedure determination. If yes, please check your IMG activity:
SPRO
- CRM
- Basic Functions
   - Pricing
    - Pricing in the Business Transaction
     - Determine Pricing Procedures
Here, the Sales organization, Dis. Channel, Division are the org. data determined in the transaction; the Doc. Pricing Procedure is the one defined in the transaction type (IMG activity: Define Transaction Types->Assignment of Business Transaction Categories-> BUS2000115 -> Customizing header -> field 'Doc. Pric.Proc.'); the Cust. Pricing Procedure is taken from the sold-to party's BP master sales area data (in the billing) tab.
Hope the information could be helpful.
Best regards,
Maggie

Go-live in EC-CS:update trading partner and transaction type on Balances

Hi collegues,
We are on a go-live this december for EC-CS (consolidation) but never have used trading partner nor consolidation transaction type so there are not GL account balances differenciated by these two items on our FMGLFLEXT database for the operative ledger.
Which is the best option for the data to be collected into our consolidation ledger in EC-CS (ECMCT database) when data transfer for all our consolidation units will be realtime update from FI?
I really don't know if I must correct the balance on FMGLFLEXT throught FI postings or if just adjustments on EC-CS it's the best option. I'm thinking on the posibility of extracting the Financial Statement at any time from F.01 tx...
Is there any transaction on FI to authomatically update at least the trading partner on GL accounts positions/balances?
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Rushid

Hi David,
In fact there has never existed any entry for trading partners on GL, AR, AP master data. So consequenly, no balance in FAGLFLEXT/ nor documents on BSEG have ever had these fields populated.
My question is: which is the common option for a go live in such situation? Our users will distribute the current GL balances into "sub-balances" (GLAcctTxtypetradpartner) in an excell file but I do not really know what to do with this data:
- direct postings on BSEG cancelling the previous totals,
- rollup into a Special ledger of the new gl,
- rollup into the Preparations for Consolidation Ledger,
- corrections on ECMCT after the periodic extract...
What would choose?
Thanks!

Transaction type used for FA posting to depreciation area 01 (ordinary dep)

Hi Expert,
There is a difference between my ordinary dep area 01 and book dep area 03.
area 01 is having a USD100
area 03 is having zero USD
I need to zerolized area 01.
I have created a new TTY and limit the dep area posting to 01 in OAYA. However, when I tried to post via ABZE, it is giving me an error message AA350.
Diagnosis
According to Table T093A, if you use transaction type 050, area 03 has to adopt values from area 01 (chart of depreciation TPGL). However, the specifications made in Table TABWA for the two areas do not agree.
Procedure
Maintain the transaction type using the Customizing menu. Both areas have to have either the indicator 'propose for posting' or 'has to be posted'.
I have checked both tables and it is not allowing me to post to area 01 only. I have done this before by creating a new TTY and post to area 02 and it works.
Please advise soon how to rectify this.
Thanks.
Angel.

Hi,
please check ion OABC if area 02 takes over the values identically.
regards Bernhard

Transaction type to be used for revaluation

Hi Sir,
Question is how to revaluate the asset.
1. In oabw, oayr and in ao90 I checked and the posting of gross revaluation in abaw Tty 800 is posted.
2. It is shown in aw01n.
Till here It is fine, after that What I need to do.
Pl Suggest different scenarios.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
You have been using manual revaluation, please go through following documnetation which will help you to understand. (If you have defined separate depreciation area for revaluation then such area post APC values periodically) or you are using existing depreciation area which post APC values periodically then you need to run periodic posting to post values in FI. IF APC values are being posted realtime for the area which is being revaluated e.g. area 01 then you have already done all activity and not required to do anything else.
Manual Planning
If you choose to plan revaluation manually, the revaluation report can still be used to create the depreciation areas required for the individual assets. If you choose, the report does not create a posting session in that case. For planning, use transaction type Rxx (xx = key of the revaluation). The system automatically creates this transaction type when you define the revaluation.
If you want to post gross revaluation, that is, with the revaluation of historical depreciation (backlog calculation), use transaction type 800. Transaction type 800 is defined in the standard system so that it posts to all depreciation areas that allow for revaluation and backlog calculation in their Customizing definitions. If you want to limit the posting of gross revaluation only to specific depreciation areas, you have to change the Customizing definition of transaction type 800 accordingly (function Areas). Or copy transaction type 800 and change the copy.
In this instance also, FI documents are not created until the periodic posting of the depreciation area to Financial Accounting is carried out.
Thanks!!!
Murlidhar Khatri

Partner Determination using Transaction Type in Org Model

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for