WARNING: /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@1/sd@0,0 (sd0)

Hello-
The following error has now appeared when I boot my Solaris 8 system. Does anyone have any suggestions on how I can recover from this.
Thanks!
WARNING: /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@1/sd@0,0 (sd0):
Error for Command: read Error Level: Retryable
Requested Block: 195856 Error Block: 195865
Vendor: SEAGATE Serial Number: LMB31343
Sense Key: Media Error
ASC: 0x11 (unrecovered read error), ASCQ: 0x0, FRU: 0xe4
WARNING: /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@1/sd@0,0 (sd0):
Error for Command: read Error Level: Retryable
Requested Block: 195856 Error Block: 195865
Vendor: SEAGATE Serial Number: LMB31343
Sense Key: Media Error
ASC: 0x11 (unrecovered read error), ASCQ: 0x0, FRU: 0xe4
WARNING: /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@1/sd@0,0 (sd0):
Error for Command: read Error Level: Retryable
Requested Block: 195856 Error Block: 195865
Vendor: SEAGATE Serial Number: LMB31343
Sense Key: Media Error
ASC: 0x11 (unrecovered read error), ASCQ: 0x0, FRU: 0xe4
WARNING: /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@1/sd@0,0 (sd0):
Error for Command: read Error Level: Retryable
Requested Block: 195856 Error Block: 195865
Vendor: SEAGATE Serial Number: LMB31343
Sense Key: Media Error
ASC: 0x11 (unrecovered read error), ASCQ: 0x0, FRU: 0xe4
WARNING: /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@1/sd@0,0 (sd0):
Error for Command: read Error Level: Retryable
Requested Block: 195856 Error Block: 195865
Vendor: SEAGATE Serial Number: LMB31343
Sense Key: Media Error
ASC: 0x11 (unrecovered read error), ASCQ: 0x0, FRU: 0xe4
WARNING: /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@1/sd@0,0 (sd0):
Error for Command: read Error Level: Fatal
Requested Block: 195856 Error Block: 195865
Vendor: SEAGATE Serial Number: LMB31343
Sense Key: Media Error
ASC: 0x11 (unrecovered read error), ASCQ: 0x0, FRU: 0xe4
WARNING: /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@1/sd@0,0 (sd0):
Error for Command: read Error Level: Retryable
Requested Block: 195856 Error Block: 195865
Vendor: SEAGATE Serial Number: LMB31343
Sense Key: Media Error
ASC: 0x11 (unrecovered read error), ASCQ: 0x0, FRU: 0xe4
WARNING: /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@1/sd@0,0 (sd0):
Error for Command: read Error Level: Retryable
Requested Block: 195856 Error Block: 195865
Vendor: SEAGATE Serial Number: LMB31343
Sense Key: Media Error
ASC: 0x11 (unrecovered read error), ASCQ: 0x0, FRU: 0xe4
WARNING: /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@1/sd@0,0 (sd0):
Error for Command: read Error Level: Retryable
Requested Block: 195856 Error Block: 195865
Vendor: SEAGATE Serial Number: LMB31343
Sense Key: Media Error
ASC: 0x11 (unrecovered read error), ASCQ: 0x0, FRU: 0xe4
WARNING: /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@1/sd@0,0 (sd0):
Error for Command: read Error Level: Retryable
Requested Block: 195856 Error Block: 195865
Vendor: SEAGATE Serial Number: LMB31343
Sense Key: Media Error
ASC: 0x11 (unrecovered read error), ASCQ: 0x0, FRU: 0xe4
WARNING: /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@1/sd@0,0 (sd0):
Error for Command: read Error Level: Retryable
Requested Block: 195856 Error Block: 195865
Vendor: SEAGATE Serial Number: LMB31343
Sense Key: Media Error
ASC: 0x11 (unrecovered read error), ASCQ: 0x0, FRU: 0xe4
WARNING: /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@1/sd@0,0 (sd0):
Error for Command: read Error Level: Fatal
Requested Block: 195856 Error Block: 195865
Vendor: SEAGATE Serial Number: LMB31343
Sense Key: Media Error
ASC: 0x11 (unrecovered read error), ASCQ: 0x0, FRU: 0xe4
INITSH: /sbin/rcS: cannot execute
INIT: Cannot create /var/adm/utmpx
INIT: failed write of utmpx entry:" "
INIT: failed write of utmpx entry:" "
INIT: SINGLE USER MODE

As you can guess your harddrive goes bad.
Boot from CD-ROM into single-user mode
boot cdrom -s
Start the format program, select the disk.
Try to analyze the surface (select a non-destructive test !!!)
Probably the bad spot can be relocated. If not replace the disk after doing a backup.
Use format to get the information on the disk-layout
Try to fsck the slices one by one
Backup the valuable data to tape

Similar Messages

  • PCI-DIO-32HS (PCI-6533) setup problem

    Hello
    I am in the process of setting up a Windows XP-based Labview 7.1 system and I am encountering a frustrating problem. Just to make sure I provide enough details, I'll describe what I've done so far, step-by-step (sorry if this gets tedious):
    First, I installed Labview and the NI-DAQ 7.3 drivers. I powered down the system and installed two PCI cards: a PCI-6031E and a PCI-DIO-32HS (PCI-6533) in PCI slots 1 and 2, respectively. I powered the system back up, went into MAX and configured the cards as follows:
    PCI-6031E: Device 1; AI: Polarity/Range=-10.0V - +10.0V, Referenced Single Ended; AO: Polarity=Bipolar; Accessory=SCB-100
    PCI-DIO-32HS: Device 2; Accessory=SCB-68
    I then started up Labview and ran my VI. This VI has been in use for 2 years now on the same NI hardware, so it's been well-tested and works great on other systems. However, when I run it on this system, the PCI-DIO-32HS spits out an error, with "Digital Buffer Write" as the source, and with a code of -10843 (buffer underflow).
    What's interesting is that I had this exact same problem when I was setting this system up in Mac OS 9. That time, I realized that the problem could have been due to the fact that I installed the hardware before I installed the software, so there may have been problems communicating with the device. By uninstalling everything and then re-installing it in the proper order, I solved the problem and was able to run the VI flawlessly. I'm assuming that these two problems are related in their nature, but this time around I was very careful to make sure that I did all of the setting up properly (I did it twice just to make sure. It did not work either time), so I'm not sure what could be the exact source of this one.
    Please let me know if you have any ideas as to what the source of this problem might be. Like I said before, I think there's probably a resource problem that's causing a communication failure which results in no data being sent to the DIO card (hence the buffer underflow error), but I can't figure out where to look for such a problem or how to fix it. Obviously, I'm rather new to Labview and everything about it, so the help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    Thanks for the reply. I have run the test panels, and I have not generated any errors in them. I've verified that I can definitely do output, because LEDs on my equipment turn on when turn on output on certain channels.
    So, I agree that the problem lies in the VI. I was not the author of the VI, however, so I'm not sure where to look. The author was also kind enough to have not provided any documentation. What would be a good example VI to run? I've never looked at any of them.
    As for how the program works, I don't believe there's any actual input coming back into the DIO-32HS. The system is used for electrophysiology. The DIO sends a signal to flash LEDs at given intervals. Electrodes then pick up an electrical signal from the retina of a mouse, which is sent to the DAQ card and written to a file. I have run complete tests, and proper data files were generated and contained expected voltage values. The only part that's not working right now is that the LEDs aren't flashing due to this error.
    I did some digging around in the program, but I couldn't come up with much. I verified that the program expects the DIO card to be Device 2, so there's no problem there. Aside from that, I couldn't find anything that seemed like it would apply.
    Thanks for your help! I have no experience with Labview, yet I've found myself placed in the "Labview expert" position over here, so I've kind of been forced into a sink-or-swim type crash course where I learn as I go.

  • PCI vs. PCI-X nomenclature

    I have read the past couple months of questions & answers re: PCI, PCI-X & PCI Express or "e" card topics and think I have one that hasn't been answered yet...kinda
    I would like to add a 3-port Firewire 400 card and a 3-port USB 2 card to my G5.
    My G5 slot configs are:
    Full-length PCI-X slots: one 133MHz, 64-bit slot and two 100MHz, 64-bit slots
    I have researched and followed numerous links to cards recommended within the Discussions and have found a decent amount of PCI 3-port Firewire 400 & USB 2 cards (not combos, btw). But, none of the sites (SmallDog, Newegg, etc, etc) have the actual name of PCI-X. Just PCI.
    Am I being too A-type because I think I need to see the "-X" at the end of PCI??
    Small Dog - http://www.smalldog.com/product/36283
    Someone recommended this card in a thread who had my exact G5. It doesn't look like the notches on the connecting tab will match up with the actual slot. AND it is listed as PCI, NOT PCI-X.
    This image really helped me understand the visual difference - http://us.st11.yimg.com/us.st.yimg.com/I/lovemacs1945261989644
    *The 3 open slots my G5 has is the second one down in this graphic, PCI-X (I believe 1.0, too)
    Am I going full-blown obsessive compulsive on this or what?! ; ) Card names, mfgs, links to cards that will work, ideas are mucho appreciated.
    Dave
    dual 2Ghz G5   Mac OS X (10.4.9)  

    It is either PCI 33MHz 64-bit, or the more rare PCI Express.
    So yes, a little
    I would check http://www.xlr8yourmac.com for compatibility
    OWC http://www.macsales.com for what they sell
    Usually can't go far wrong with Sonnet
    http://www.sonnettech.com

  • Sharing an external sample clock between PCI-6722 and PCI-6602

        I need PCI-6602 work with PCI-6722。6602 shares 6722’s ao/SampleClock as external clock and triggered by 6722’s ao/StartTrigger。The master device is 6722, which refered as Dev1, and the slave device is 6602, which refered as Dev2. A RTSI line is used to connect the two devices correctly.
        I use C API to finish my program and my code is as follows:
    //config 6722 analog out task
    1、DAQmxCreateTask("NI6672", &hAOTask);
    2、DAQmxCreateAOVoltageChan(hAOTask, "Dev1/ao0", "", -10.0, 10.0, DAQmx_Val_Volts, "" );
    3、DAQmxCfgSampClkTiming(hAOTask, "", 1000.0, DAQmx_Val_Rising, DAQmx_Val_ContSamps, 1000);
    4、DAQmxWriteAnalogF64(hAOTask, 1000, 0, 10.0, DAQmx_Val_GroupByChannel, data, NULL, NULL);
    //config 6602 counter task
    5、DAQmxCreateTask("NI6602", &hCounterTask);
    6、DAQmxCreateCICountEdgesChan(hCounterTask, "Dev2/ctr0", "", DAQmx_Val_Rising, 0, DAQmx_Val_CountUp);
    //use /Dev1/ao/SampleClock for external clock
    7、DAQmxCfgSampClkTiming(hCounterTask, "/Dev1/ao/SampleClock", 1000.0, DAQmx_Val_Rising, DAQmx_Val_ContSamps, 1000);
    //use /Dev1/ao/StartTrigger
    8、DAQmxSetTrigAttribute (hCounterTask, DAQmx_ArmStartTrig_Type, DAQmx_Val_DigEdge);
    9、DAQmxSetTrigAttribute (hCounterTask, DAQmx_DigEdge_ArmStartTrig_Src, "/Dev1/ao/StartTrigger");
    10、DAQmxSetTrigAttribute (hCounterTask, DAQmx_DigEdge_ArmStartTrig_Edge, DAQmx_Val_Rising);
    //start counter task first
    11、DAQmxStartTask(hCounterTask);
    //start 6722 task
    12、DAQmxStartTask(hAOTask);
    I run it on the MAX virtual Device, and the Step 11always returned -89120。
    I try to slove this problem, so I change the Step 7, use /Dev2/PFI9 to instead of /Dev1/ao/SampleClock.
    7、DAQmxCfgSampClkTiming(hCounterTask, "/Dev2/PFI9", 1000.0, DAQmx_Val_Rising, DAQmx_Val_ContSamps, 1000);
    The code runs well, but I don’t know which terminal is connected by /Dev2/PFI9. Does it connect to /Dev1/ao/SampleClock?
    I use another API DAQmxConnectTerms to ensure that, I add a Step before Step 11.
    DAQmxConnectTerms( "/Dev1/ao/SampleClock", "/Dev2/PFI9", DAQmx_Val_DoNotInvertPolarity );
    The program also run well. But I am still not sure that 6602 is sharing /Dev1/ao/SampleClock。If not, which terminal of Dev1 is connected by /Dev2/PFI9?
    Is my code right? If not, hwo to fix my code or supply some example for me? Thanks.

    Hello Shokey,
    From looking over your post, it looks like you want to program in C, using simulated instruments, a master/slave design with a PCI-6602 and PCI-6722. The PCI-6722 is the master device and the PCI-6602 is the slave device. In order to implement this with the real cards, you would need a RTSI cable between the 2 cards in order to pass the triggers and the sample clock. Unfortunately with simulated devices you can't implement this so parts of your code won't be able to work exactly like if you had the instrument.
    If you did have the instrument, you can implement this by performing the following steps:
    Master Device:
    1.) Export the ao/SampleClock and ao/StartTrigger to a RTSI Line. (See DAQmx C Reference help for DAQmxExportSignal to export these)
    Slave Device:
    1.) Set the Sample clock and the trigger to the RTSI.
    There is another forum that I think will help you out to implement this correctly. In this forum, the customer was trying to export a trigger through a RTSI and the problem he was experiencing was a broken RTSI cable. His code, he states, works. I hope this helps you with this and if you have any more questions, feel free to post.
    Jim St
    National Instruments
    RF Product Support Engineer

  • PCがリブートする(PCI-DIO-96,PCI-MIO-16EX-10)

    PCI-DIO-96とPCI-MIO-16EX-10を使用しているソフトがあり、今回、若干の変更を行いました。
    変更前から使用しているPCで動作させたところ、まれにPCのリブートが発生してしまいます。
    ソフト変更部分には特に問題は無さそうです。
    リブート発生時に以下のようなイベントログが記録されているようです。
    対処方法をご教示頂きたく、宜しくお願い申し上げます。
    <Event Log>
    Type Information Event ID: 1001
    The computer has rebooted from a bugcheck. The bugcheck was:
    0x000000d1(0x00000000,0x00000002,0x00000000,0xbff286fe).
    Microsoft Windows 2000[v15.2195]. A dump wa saved in: C:\WINNT\MEMORY.DMP.
    動作環境は以下の通りです。
    <PC>
    DELL Optiplex GX60 BIOS:A08
    <OS>
    Windows2000 SP4 5.00.2195
    <Measurement & Automation Explorer System Information>
    NI-DAQ    6.9.2f8
    NI-PAL Sowftware 1.5.6f0
    CVI Run-Time  6.0.4.105
    IVI Engine   1.83
    NI Spy    1.4
    NI-VISA    2.5.2
    以上

    Intoさん
     参考になるか分かりませんが、過去にプログラムを若干変更した後にランダムに再起動する症状の
    報告があります。
     NIPALK message(NI Discussion Forums>MultifunctionDAQ)
     解決策としては、NI-DAQのアップデートで直ったようです。もし今お使いのドライバのバージョンに
    こだわりがなければ、最新版をインストールされてはいかがでしょうか。
     NI-DAQmx 8.8 - Windows 2000/Vista x64/Vista x86/XP
     Intoさんは以前にも同様のご質問をされていたかと思いますが、そちらは改善されたのでしょうか。
    ひょっとしたらWindows 2000にすることで解決されたのでしょうか。もしよろしければ教えてください。
    このメッセージは  10-25-2008 07:51 AM
    に Hisasis TAKASU が編集しています。

  • Anybody using a PCI-Express to PCI Adapter for your legacy audio hardware?

    Anybody using one with success? I dint think there was such a thing until I found this http://www.virtuavia.eu/shop/pci-express-to-pci-adapter-p29855.html.
    If you have used one or are researching one for yourself, could you please provide make, model, a link to company website and any comments.
    Thanks,
    I have an old Echo Gina24 card thats not worth selling and still works great on my PC.

    Grant Bennet-Alder wrote:
    [ . . . ] has no support for Mac OS anything.
    the startech web page cited does say no driver or software installation required. Does that imply larger compatility, say with the mac, i wonder.

  • Inquiring about the issue of using PCI-5922 and PCI-5412 simultaneously under Linux OS! Thank you!

    hi all,I am lily and I an AE from NI shanghai .Now I confronted a pullze from customer,and I really feel at a loss! Hope some one of you would come and land me a hand,thank you in advance!
    The problem is as follows:
    Customer use PCI-5922 and PCI -5412 under Linux OS, if they use either of the two cards seperately,there would be OK. but if the use both of the two cards simultaneously, the error will occured as attachment shows. "Error code:-50258 occured at niscope_DAQmx Create Channel (AI-Voltage-Base).vi:2  Possible reason(s):The specified software component failed to initialize."
    Can I know is there any solution vs this probelm?Thank you in advance!!
    Attachments:
    Screenshot-NI-DAQmx Test Panels.png ‏17 KB
    NI-NEW_error.txt ‏8 KB
    shortsyms.txt ‏973 KB

    This is the wrong board for this question, you should re-post here
    Regards
    Ray Farmer

  • How to reduce reading and recording data time/ Visual C++, PCI 6024E and PCI-MIO-16E?

    Right now I am working on a data communication programme. The time of reading digital signal and recording data is more than I expected, which is about 100 microsecond. I need to reduce the time. The software I am using is Visual C++ 6.0. I use two DAQ boards, which are PCI-6024E and PCI-MIO-16E. I have set the priority of Visual C++ to be realtime by task manager. The operating systme is Windows XP.
    I am wondering how to set the interrupt of reading or writing data to be the highest and stop any other kind of interrupt.
    Thanks in advance!

    The primary limitation you will encounter when trying to do high speed
    digital I/O using your E-Series hardware is that the digital lines are
    all software timed.  This means that for each and every digital
    read it is necessary for your software to issue a command to your
    hardware, read a single point, then receive the response from the
    board.  This prevents you from performing digital operations at
    very high speed.  In general, I would say that 100 microseconds is
    a very good response using software-timed digital I/O on a Windows
    computer.
    It is difficult to make a good recommendation without more detail about
    what you are trying to do.  You may need to consider switching to
    a Real-Time operating system, or upgrading your DAQ hardware to a board
    that will allow you to time your digital acquisitions on the board
    itself.  These devices, such as the m-Series DAQ or the PCI-653x
    series, would allow you to use hardware triggers for your digital
    acquisitions, change detection, and buffered data acquisitions to
    reduce the software overhead involved in a rapid acquisition.

  • Synchronisation de PCI-4472 et PCI-4474 et support DAQ traditionnel/DAQmx

    Bonjour,
    comment émuler la fonction RTSI (synchronisation de l'acquisition entre
    les
    cartes PCI 4472 et 4474) avec DAQmx version 7.2 ?
    A l'éxécution de l'exemple Multi-Device Synch-Shared Timebase-Cont
    Acquisition.vi, j'obtiens le message d'erreur suivant :
    L'erreur -200452 s'est produite à Noeud de propriété DAQmx Timing (arg 1)
    dans
    Multi-Device Synch-Shared Timebase-Cont Acquisition.vi
    Raison(s) possible(s) :
    Specified property is not supported by the device or is not applicable to
    the
    task.
    Property: MasterTimebase.Src
    Task Name: _unnamedTask<3>

    (Réponse identique au forum posté le 10/05/2004).
    Bonjour,
    Les cartes PCI-4472 et PCI-4474 ne sont pas dans la liste des cartes compatibles avec l'exemple "Multi-Device Synch-Shared Timebase-Cont Acquisition.vi".
    Ceci peut expliquer pourquoi le noeud de propriété renvoie une erreur DAQmx.
    Vous pouvez utiliser l'exemple "Multi-Device Sync AI Shared Timebase & Trig DSA" qui a été développé spécialement pour les cartes DSA (et donc les PCI-4472 & 4474).
    Cet exemple permet de faire de l'acquisition simultanée finie avec déclenchement commun. Pour faire une acquisition continue, il vous suffira de paramétrer le NI-DAQmx Timing à "Continuous samples" et d'intégrer le NI-DAQmx Read dans une boucle While.
    Cordialement.

  • PCI-6024E or PCI-6034E

    Can I use pci-6024e or pci-6034e card to get 0.5mV~50mV
    data precision 0.01mV.Can is it work?

    Hi Anon...
    I do not know the specs of those cards off hand, but I will explain how to figure it out yourself.
    Find the range of the board that you will use for the measurement.
    Divide the max value by 2^n where n=number of bits of resolution.
    Ben
    Ben Rayner
    I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
    Rayner's Ridge is under construction

  • PCI-X or PCI Extreme?

    I need to order a SATA card for a Dual 2 GHz G5 PowerMac.
    System Profiler says the model is PowerMac11,2.
    Does that provide enough information to know whether it has PCI-X or PCI Express?
    Thanks,
    Gary Smith

    According to this
    http://www.theapplemuseum.com/index.php?id=36#
    that would make it a dual-core "Late 2005" with PCI Express slots
    http://support.apple.com/specs/powermac/PowerMac_G5_Late2005.html

  • PCI Express or pci-X?

    I have read everything from Apple online and I must say Im not sure why they are offering both. Maybe its because I dont know enough about each or the advantages? Im assuming that PCI-X is a way of not scaring off everyone befroe they totally switch over. Is PCI and PCI-X relatively the same? I know express is newer. Is the express the move for the future? Also are the dual-cores the 'tels we have been waiting for? Bored and feel like answering my not so urgent questions, great! I would love to here some people responses who particulary use these computers for graphics as well.

    Hi Siege,
    Im assuming that PCI-X is a way of not scaring off everyone befroe they totally switch over.
    That's right. At launch time, the dual-core Power Mac G5s lacked PCI slots for backwards compatibility. A lot of pro equipment comes in the form of PCI or PCI-X cards. For those who want to keep their heavy investment in third party equipment, the older 2.7GHz G5 with PCI-X is still an option.
    PCI-X is an extension of PCI. 3.3v PCI cards go into PCI-X slots quite nicely. Still, PCI is running out of steam in terms of bandwidth.
    PCIe is a radical departure from PCI. Each PCIe device gets a direct link instead of sharing the bus with the other devices. Bandwidth is greatly improved as well by simply increasing lane width instead of hard to improve raw clock speed. With this big push, expect to see more PCIe cards in the near future.
    The dual-core G5s are still PowerPC. The Intel-powered Macs won't appear until next year at the earliest.
    Basically if you don't have any PCI-X cards or a sizable sum of DDR SDRAM, go for the newer PCIe G5s.

  • Work with PCI-6052E and PCI-6601 simultaneously

    Hi, I'm working with PCI-6052 for bufered data output and PCI-6601 for read two encoders at same time, when I work with single board I don't have problems but when I work both simultaneously I have a problem only I can out data or only I can read the encoders but not both at the same time. How I make this?

    Hi,
    You probably have one task in LabView running in series after the other. Both of these tasks require a loop. Your buffered data output needs to be written in continuous fashion in a loop (I believe) and your encoder measurements are being read constantly as well (should be in a loop). Try experimenting with these two suggestions.
    I would copy both programs into 1 VI and keep them running completely separate. LabView will be able to assign each a different thread so they should be able to run completely in parallel. Therefore you would have 2 parallel loops that are not connected at all.
    You can also create two completely different VIs and run them in parallel. There is no reason why the two different programs would interfere.
    Hope that he
    lps. Have a good day.
    Ron

  • Synchronize PCI- 5421 and PCI-6602

    I am using a PCI 6602 to generate four pulse trains. I am also generating a signal with a PCI 5421 AWG. All signals are started at the same time by using a common start trigger. The problem I am having is that after they run for a while the 6602 and 5421 signal start drifting. I know in the past I had sync clocks in a PXI chassis but I am unsure how to syncronize the clocks using PCI card. I do have an RTSI cable linking the cards together so could someone please give me an example of how to sycronize these cards in Labview (8.2)

    Hello Kiebach,
    You seem to be connecting the signal correctly in your NI-DAQmx program. However, I do not see any NI-FGEN code where you import the signal to be used as an external clock. Have you added this code? I think you would benefit from examining the example program entitled "niFgen_DAQmx_Synchronization_Example.vi". This program shows how to synchronize an NI-DAQmx device and an SMC Arb device. You can find the example by opening the NI Example Finder utility; you can open this utility from LabVIEW by going to the Help menu and selecting Find Examples... Once you have opened the NI Example Finder, you can navigate to this example by selecting the Browse tab and going to Hardware Input and Output>>Modular Instruments>>NI-FGEN (Signal Generators)>>Synchronization. You will notice that this example uses the Export Signals VI rather than the Connect Terminals VI. To help understand the difference between these two, you may want to examine this document.
    Matt Anderson
    Hardware Services Marketing Manager
    National Instruments

  • To access Kistler Dynamomete​r Amplifier (4 component) do I need to use PCI 4452 and PCI 1200 ( I have both of them) with DAQ/LAbvie​w.

    If yes How to relate them together both in VI and by Hardware.
    Thanks,
    Niraj

    "Thanks for your attention,
    I have Dynamometer with four analog outputs to respective amplifier's,all of which I have to connect to NI's BNC 2140, which will be connected to PCI 4452, now I even have PCi 1200 which is also a DAQ card I suppose. I want to know whether I need to connect both of these together in anyway, and ultimatly will they appear on single VI together or seperatly. Like I have developed single VI for both, but Is it possible to Develop VI with access to both.
    Also is it necesary to use both, I want to know whether my application will be handled by PCI 4452 alone,
    I suppose I am clear this time about my application and things available with me.
    please let me know if not,
    Thanking you,
    Niraj"

Maybe you are looking for