Web-module one step backwards

I am using the web-module for all my assigments, so this module is of great importance to me.
My galleries are created through TTG-templates and has been a breeeze to use. Unfortunately Adobe no longer support certain standards (I don't know the technial meaning of this) thus resultning my prewies are pretty lame in comparison to LR3.
On the other hand Adobe still supports the flash-galleries although flash, as I understanding, is a death path.
Mathhew from TTG pages has a longer discussion of these issues, including the technical buzz of which I understand nada , here: http://theturninggate.net/2012/01/lightroom-4-public-beta-ttg/
Brogaard - brogaard.com

BIG BIG problem with the new web module is that it doesn't offer any HTML5 galleries. By all means continue to offer the Flash galleries, but as we all know that Flash is going the way of the Dodo, we must see some HTML5 galleries so that people who use Apple products can actually see the galleries we create.
This really is important and I am surprised and astonished that Adobe haven't addressed this area.

Similar Messages

Asus G1 & kernel 2.6.23 : one step backwards

Hi all,
I've been annoyed for a long time with a high pitch noise problem when laptop not plugged to AC (i.e on battery). To my great relief the problem had gone with kernel 2.6.22 ... And now it's back with kernel 2.6.23 !!!
This is probably due to fan speed handling, I don't know really. Been playing around with kpowersave with no result.
Of course, if you plug the computer back to AC the noise stops immediately.
Please help, this is just driving me mad !!

Might help

Am I the only one who finds the new improved Itunes a step backwards?

Am I the only one who finds the new improved Itunes a step backwards? Whatever happended to simplicity?

No not just you, its rubbish! Nothing is organised in a logical way. I have lost pretty much all of my album art that was ripped at the same time as the CD and now says it can't find album art for the majority of them.
What a useless piece of s***

Error on deploying JSP web module

Hi,
I've created a JSP web module that consumes a web service. I'm following this tutorial
[http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f0cf9e42-ccb0-2c10-d0a4-f5aa8a79e19a?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f0cf9e42-ccb0-2c10-d0a4-f5aa8a79e19a?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true]
But when I deploy my ear project, I had this error
Application error occurred during the request procession.
Details: com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.exceptions.WebIOException:
Error compiling [/sample.jsp] of alias [LocalDevelopmentdc_webmodulesap.com] of J2EE application [sap.com/dc_webmoduleear].
Exception id: [001CC43ABAC00086000056FB00006CEA0004A5A7E1A64FD3]
Here's the java code in the JSP:
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext();
WS_Preview obj = (WS_Preview).ctx.lookup("java:comp/env/newproxy");
WS_PreviewViDocument port = (WS_PreviewViDocument)obj.getLogicalPort("Config1Port_Document",WS_PreviewViDocument.class);
GetElementXHTMLValueResponse result = new GetElementXHTMLValueResponse();
result = port.GetElementXHTMLValue("A","A","A");
out.print(result);
Does anyone know how to solve this error? Thanks

Because you do not have an infrastructure database, you will not be able to deploy your web service from OEM as one of its steps is to register the service in the UDDI registy - the Web service deployment and UDDI registration are tied tightly together in OEM right now.
All is not lost, however. You have two routes to deploy the Web Service on Oracle9iAS:
1. Use DCM, which is the command line interface to deploy applications/webservices/wars/ears on Oracle9iAS. It does not have the dependency on UDDI.
To deploy a Web service using DCM, say your Web service ear file were named test.ear your deployment command would look something like:
c:\oracle\ora903\dcm\bin\dcmctl deployApplication -file test.ear
See the doc for much more detail to let you tailor DCM to do all the stuff that is available through EM or specific to your application:
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/A97329_03/core.902/a92171/dcm.htm#643834
2. In JDeveloper 9.0.3, there is a DCM Servlet that lets you do remote deployment to Oracle9iAS:
http://otn.oracle.com/products/jdev/htdocs/readme_9031.html#viadcm
I suspect your deployment problem from Oracle9i JDeveloper may be (this may be an incorrect assumption) due to trying to use a connection that is setup as if Oracle9iAS is a standalone OC4J.
Mike.

Edit decision table from the web module

Hello every one <br>I am using decision table to create rules and my question is can I edit decision table from the web module <br> i.e. can I change decision table values from jsp files(invoke.jsp) and if yes can any one please tell me the steps I should fallow to do it.<br>
thank you.

Hi Pratap,
No, this is not possible. The Decision Table API is not public and the condition and action values can be changed only through the NWDS in BRM 7.1.1
Regards,
Arti

V2.3 vs v2.4 web-modules in NetBeans

I'm using NetBeans v3.6 IDE (on Win-XP).
When I create a JSP-project, I first do the 'convert filesystem to web-module'
operation, which generates the WEB-INF sub-directory and creates
(among other things) a file named 'web.xml'. Inside that file, is information
relating to whether the webapp will be v2.4 (vs v2.3) conforming.
(Right now, it is generating v2.4 info.)
What I do NOT understand is what knob(s) to tweak if/when I want a
project to use the older V2.3 info.
(Simply 'editing' the generated web.xml file is clearly NOT what I think
is intended, as the FORMAT of the v2.3 does NOT have an explicit
version=x.y string like it does in v2.4.)
Also, I believe there is a later-step in Netbeans web-module development
where you do some other operation (that copies 4 .JAR taglibs into the
project area), and I suspect that this latter step is DEPENDENT on
first getting the v2.3 vs v2.3 decision setup correctly.
Can someone please CLARIFY my suspicions, and explicitly
state what these two steps are and how to be able to
have 2 separate web-module projects, where one proj
is 2.3 based and the other is 2.4 based?
TIA...
Dave

Hi Dave,
I'm afraid that NetBeans 3.6 doesn't have such feature to create your web.xml according to J2EE 1.3 (i.e. Servlet 2.3). AFAIK there is a description in help topic, how to upgrade/downgrade J2EE level of your web module.
However there is such feature in NetBeans 4.0 and 4.1 - you can set up your project's J2EE version when you create a project.
-Karel

Deploying application with several web modules having the same context root

Hi,
I would like to be able to deploy an application in Weblogic 12c having one ejb module and several web modules with the same context root. Even though the web modules have the same context root, each of them is deployed to a different virtual host.
Weblogic allows deploying the modules this way as long as their targets are different (i.e. each having a distinct virtual host). However this works only when I don't select a target for the .ear:
Component Type Current Targets
application.ear Enterprise Application (None specified)
application.jar EJB AdminServer
web1.war WEBAPP virtualHost1
web2.war WEBAPP virtualHost2
However if I select as target for the .ear to be AdminServer, the deployment doesn't work anymore, complaining that the context roots are in conflict.
If I remove web2.war from the .ear and deploy the .ear and .jar to AdminServer and web1.war to virtualHost1, the deployment works but the strange thing is that the web application can be accessed also through the AdminServer's main network channel, even though I would expect that it should be accessible only through virtualHost1 network channel. I believe this is the reason why there are context root conflicts when specifying a target for the .ear, because both wars are made accessible to the main network channel.
The reason why I want to keep the wars inside the same .ear is because I want to make them access the application's local EJBs (since as far as I know it's not possible to access a local EJB outside the application even if they belong to the same VM).
Is there a way to deploy the web modules only to the virtual hosts without being targeted to the main network channel?
Regards,
Alexandru

Murphy's Law: If anything can go wrong it will
A corollary to Murphy's law: When everything fails, read the manual.
Web application funda: Every web application must have its own context root. So, if wkfsocos is one
web application then, wkfsocos1 is another web application -
and hence must have its own context root.
Hello Aman,
If you are in E-Commerce version 4.0, then read this
[ISA_Buildtool document |https://service.sap.com/~sapdownload/011000358700001920472003E/ISA_BuildTool_10.pdf]
to create a copy of the application in its own context root.
From your URL pattern I guess you are in E-Commerce version 4.0.
If you are in E-Commerce 5.0 or above, then the
[Extension Guide |http://service.sap.com/~sapdownload/011000358700006120622006E/]gives steps to create a copy with its own context root for use in modification.
(See the chapter on - Creating a project specific Web Application with own context root )
Both these links require access to SAP Service Marketplace. You can also find the
documents through /instguides shortcut in Service Marketplace.
Easwar Ram
http://www.parxlns.com

How do I use the Web module to upload video to my website?

I'm using the Lightroom HTML gallery to upload my photos, fine and dandy, very happy with it. I also have some videos trimmed in Lightroom that I want incorporated into the gallery. This doesn't seem to be happening, instead I just get thumbnails. What/how do I incorporate my video clips into my web gallery? I moved over from jAlbum so I could have a simple one-tool workflow, so I'm really hoping that this is possible.

You can combine stills and video for output to h.264 (mp4 file) for example to upload to Youtube or Vimeo.
FTP upload will be subject to the limitations of your host. The web module within Lightroom creates all resources to link to the file index.html
The forthcoming LR6 is anticipated to have HTML5 galleries.

I want to use the Web module to publish to the a website... What kind of server do I need to be able to publish my website?

I want to use the Web module to publish to the a website... What kind of server do I need to be able to publish my website?

You don't need a server, you just need a web hosting package such as the ones from GoDaddy or many other hosts. You then send the web gallery directly from LR to your web space.
As you're asking such basic questions, it might be best if you read articles like this and see if a friend or colleague can get you started.

Belle - A big step backwards.

Nokia Belle is a big a step backwards.
1. Battery life has gone pathetic. My phone does not last 4 hours, while with anna, it lasted 18 hours.
2. No way for user to kill background tasks. (App stop is not available for belle)
3. No augmented reality apps. (No wikitude, not even Nokias live view, or city view)
4. Top icons are not responsive anymore. I cannot click on battery icon and go to power saving mode.
5. App installation takes twice as long.
6. Many apps install, but do not work. (e.g. astroller).
7. Six screens have too many apps running.
Somebody PLEASE advise how to go back to anna?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Carman58 wrote:
The whole Belle experience is vastly improved from Anna, more versatile , quicker, modern, feature filled and functional, try searching the user guide on the phone, spend some time exploring it, you may find you're being over critical, The update is a MAJOR software change, not a slight update, it's like getting a brand new phone, spend a couple of days tinkering and you may turn out to really like it
I cannot for the life of me recognise the Belle improvements.
Experience is vastly improved=> can you name some of the improvements?
more versatile: examples?
quicker=> No noticable difference as far as I can tell.
modern=> you mean ugly
feature filled=> What features? I only miss features I had with Anna
                                  (eye candy isn't a feature in my opinion)
functional=> How is removing features functional?
My experience:
Widgets are bigger and clunky and cannot be configured. I have tried everything, but
      I cannot make my homescreens look as nice and neat as I had them with Anna.
     Moreover, I need MORE homescreens for the same info.
The highly functional date/clock/profile widget I enjoyed in Anna is no longer available.
      Now all I get is a BIG ugly clock and an ugly grey profile widget that does not show self-
      created profiles (I created an Outdoor profile, because the Anna standard one is no
      longer there!)
Ugly text under the shortcut icons that cannot be removed (a choice would have been
      nice)
Widget online/offline toggle is no longer available.
I can only access 'Open applications' by long pressing the menu button. I liked the
     menu option better. I do not want to wear out my menu button or have the bottom of my
     phone drop off. I love my N8 and do not want to lose it anytime soon. Forcing me to use
     hardware buttons when there perfectly fine menu options in Anna is just plain annoying.
I can no longer create folders within folders. (Yes I liked that feature!)
I can no longer switch homescreens by clicking on the software button on the bottom
      middle of the screen. (Yes, I used that a lot)
I can no longer turn on battery saving by clicking on the battery. Now I have to either
      press the power button or dive into the menu.
I liked the notification widget much better than that eyecandy slide down notification bar.
I can no longer access the connectivity menu via the homescreen. I need to go to
      menu/settings/connectivity.
With Anna, connection settings were easier. When on the road, my 3G connection was
     automatically selected and whenever I was within range of a known WiFi connection,
     that connection was automatically selected. With Belle I have to set the internet
     connection to ask what connection I want. The only other option is to hardcode either
     3G or a specific WiFi network. If that selected connection is not available, the
     connection fails. So now when I access the internet I first have to select the desired
     accesspoint. How's that an improvement?
I do not have more RAM available than I had before (80MB-90MB) and my phone does not run smoother/faster than under Anna (which was just as smooth/fast on my phone, I had no complaints!). And yes my phone was empty when I upgraded. Before I upgraded I synchronised my contacts/messages/photo's and uninstalled all apps I had installed and then performed a soft reset. The phone was empty, like I just got it from the store. I currently do not use a microSD and install all apps on the mass storage (not on C.
I am the kind of person that buys and uses the phone that I like and that gives me the functionality that I need. I do not feel any need to impress my friends. If they don't like my phone, tough! I am the one using it, so I am the only one who has to like it. All this added Eye Candy is therefore useless to me. Couldn't they just have added the eye candy without removing the handy Anna features? Then everybody would have been happy.
Someone please tell me what it is that I am, judging by your comments, obviously missing!!! Let me know what I have overlooked, because I love Nokia and I love Symbian and I want to love Belle, but I just cannot. :-(

Lion is a step backwards

Lion is a step backwards that appears to indicate a philosophical switch towards dumbing down. I realize there's lots of Mac newbies coming from iPads, iPhones, and iPods. I have no problem simplifying things for the masses, but why make the Mac OS less useful for your loyal power users? Why can am I no longer make the choices I once did? Lion makes me feel like I'm on Windows. I can only do things the way I'm allow me to, and I now must conform unlike before. I used to be able to configure my Macs to work the way I want them to. No more. A few examples:
1. I cannot assign apps to spaces. Those settings are gone. As a result, I have apps on top of each other which I hate. Even if drag one from one desktop to another within Mission Control, they eventually wind up on top of each other. Going full screen with the apps that can do that just creates other irritants. Why take away this control? How is it an improvement not allowing me to use my computer the way I want? I hate Mission Control because I have no control over it. This is a major issue for me.
2. I cannot access the dock from a full screen app. It doesn't show when my nearly ten year habit occurs. As a result, what once took a single click can take up to 5 gestures to get to the app I want. Thank God Apple hasn't taken away command+tab. Why throw away an ability I've used since 10.0? How is this better?
3. My home library folder is now hidden. I must be stupid and in need of protection from myself. Is Apple sure we will NEVER have to toss a corrupt preference file again? Yes there are work arounds, but why hide something the masses rarely messed with in the first place? At least add a "make visible" check box within Info for those of us who know what we're doing.
4. I like my devices at the top of my Finder windows because I have a lot of networked devices, but I'm FORCED to have them only at the bottom. Why can't I arrange my sidebar the way I want? This just feels like change for the sake of change without giving me any choice.
5. Many .dmgs open their own window for easy drag and drop installations. Once done, I always clicked the button in the upper right to show the sidebar to eject the .dmg. Gone! Why is it better for me to have to switch windows or go to the desktop to eject a .dmg? Why are extra steps better?
I'll quit here, but all of this suggests a philosophical shift that assumes I can no longer be trusted to configure my Macs to run the way I want. This appears to be the beginning of the end of what made Macs so great. Lion is a step backwards for the faithful.
Mac User since 1993

joeblowinski wrote:
1. I cannot assign apps to spaces. Those settings are gone.
That is true. I can't speculate on Apple thoughts on this issue. I can say that many applications had problems with Spaces and it was the source of many complaints. Apple listened and tried to make a change that would be useful to more people. Unfortunately, those few people who were using Spaces effectively are now out of luck.
2. I cannot access the dock from a full screen app.
Full screen mode is designed to isolate you from the system. If you really want to access the Dock, you have to mean it. Move the mouse to where the Dock should be. Then, try to go further. The Dock should then appear.
3. My home library folder is now hidden.
That is true. Apple is trying to discourge people from going in there. Most people will only do harm. This is certainly a work in progress. On day 1 of Lion's release, one of my first posts was to instruct someone to go in and delete some Dock preference files for a corrupted LaunchPad. In the Finder, just type Shift ⌘ g and enter "~/Library".
4. I like my devices at the top of my Finder windows because I have a lot of networked devices, but I'm FORCED to have them only at the bottom. Why can't I arrange my sidebar the way I want?
I think Apple is trying to move the OS towards more document-centric use rather than dumping them right into the root of the file system. I'm sure there are many ways to give you the same functionality. I suggest starting a new thread for that question.
5. Many .dmgs open their own window for easy drag and drop installations. Once done, I always clicked the button in the upper right to show the sidebar to eject the .dmg. Gone! Why is it better for me to have to switch windows or go to the desktop to eject a .dmg? Why are extra steps better?
You can eject it from the File menu or with ⌘ e.
I'll quit here, but all of this suggests a philosophical shift that assumes I can no longer be trusted to configure my Macs to run the way I want.
Apple trusts you. It is the other 40 million unwashed they don't trust. The sad? fact is that Apple is getting more popular now than it has ever been. Apple is trying ways to make the system easy enough for Windows or even Linux users to use. Old timers like us, used to working in a certain way, need to adapt. You don't have to do everything Apple's way. There are alternatives even to the Finder. Just give it some time and explore some new ways of doing thing.

How to get web module for CUSTCRMPRJ (crm 5.0)?

Hello all.
I try to create test CRM 5.0 application with own context root. Here are steps from Extension guide:
1) Import the Development Configuration into your Netweaver IDE.
2) Create a new Enterprise Application Development Component in Software Component CRMCUSTPRJ. If you want to extend crm/b2b, create a new development component home/b2b
3) Add the Web Module you want to extend to the Enterprise Archive
4) Adjust the context root
5) Copy all files except application.xml from the META-INF directory of SAP standard Enterprise Archive into the META-INF directory of the new Development Component. If you want to modify or extend the crm/b2b application, open the project for crm/b2b. A project for the previously created development should already be open.
Open the java perspective and copy the following files from the META-INF directory of the crm/b2b
component to the META-INF directory of the home/b2b component:
- application-j2ee-engine.xml
- data-source-aliases.xml
- log-configuration.xml
- monitor-configuration.xml
- monitor-configuration.dtd
6) Check in the new Development Component.
I found that I forgot to include web module to my new app. Oops. According to application.xml web module must be called sap.comcrmisawebb2b.war. I found it in the SAP_SHRAPP.SCA/sap.com_crm~b2b.sda. Should I use that module or no? If yes how I can include it to CUSTCRMPRJ?
Also I found that other xml files from list above can be found in several components. So I'm confusing and can't decide from which component I have to copy that files and how to set its values.
Regards, Lev

Hi Anupam
I think you need to review the IC Webclient Consultants Cookbook. It gives example sof what you're discussing.
Regards
Arden
Reward with Points if Helpful

Step backward hotkey not working while using brush tool? - Photoshop CC 2014

Hi,
I'm using Photoshop CC 2014 in Mavericks. I've tried using the step backward hotkey (command+option+z) and it seems to work fine. Then I use the brush tool and it stops working until I switch to another tool. I'm a digital artist, so I move very quickly while painting, and switching out of the brush tool to step backward on something slows me down terribly. I'll switch and the hotkey works as intended. I've tried changing it to a different set of keys (for example command+z) with the same results. Is this a bug or a feature?

Usually it turns out for tablets that aren't mainstream that they just haven't updated their drivers to work with photoshop cc.
For example, most people don't have problems with wacom tablets in photoshop cc.
One other thing that could possibly be the cause besides the tablet driver is your graphics card driver.
If in photoshop cc you go to Edit>Preferences>Performance and turn off Use Graphics Processor and then restart photoshop cc, does that make a difference?
If it does then perhaps your graphics card driver needs to be updated from the maker of the card.
(not through windows updates)

LR Web Module color management problem

I stumbled on to this discussion thread:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/3572174#3572174
initiated by “JimmysPhoto” because I have observed the same LR Web Module problem with images too saturated too much contrast and clipped highlights & shadows. Please note that this is not a settle difference, it’s a major change in the look of the image. I have a calibrated monitor using Spyder3 Elite. All other LR modules display the images exactly as I see in Development Module.
I did a test by exporting an image from the Dev Module to a file using the LR “Export “ function (from RAW to JPEG using sRBG color space) to a Windows file. When I display the image with the Windows Live Photo Gallery Viewer the image looks exactly the same as in the LR Dev module. However, opening this same image with IE-9 I get the same oversaturated look I see in the Web Module.
Because I use the LR Web Module to push photo galleries to my website host server I end up with images that do not look the way I processed them in LR – which is a serious issue for me. Was there any resolution to “JimmysPhoto” problems that I could benefit from?
I use Win7 64bit, LR 3.X and a high quality Dell U2410 display.

It's very strange that both IE9 and Chrome browsers go to the trouble of doing colour management, but both do it wrong - in different ways!
To colour-manage an image for display, you have to:
Figure out the profile of the image (often embedded in the image, or if none probably assume sRGB unless you know the image colour space by some other means)
Figure out the profile of the monitor (Windows will tell you that, if the monitor has a profile, otherwise you can't colour manage)
Using the two profiles, convert the image from the image colour space , via a Profile Connection Space (typically CIELAB (L*a*b*) or CIEXYZ), into the monitor's colour space.
The hard work is 3; finding out the profiles is easy.
IE9 does 1 and 3 but not 2. It goes to all the trouble of colour space conversion (step 3), but doesn't bother to look up the monitor profile. It assumes sRGB, which will be approximately right for most monitors, but never exactly right, and hopelessly wrong for wide gamut monitors.
Chrome does 2 and 3 but not 1. It goes to all the trouble of color space conversion, but doesn't bother to look up the image profile, assuming all images to be sRGB!
Why do the hard bit, but make a pig's ear of the easy bit?

Web modules don't get deployed to cluster instance directory

Hi,
I have a domain with one cluster, which has one instance. Sometimes (!), the web aplications I deploy don't get unpacked in the directory {instanceRoot}/applications/j2ee-modules but only in {domainRoot}/applications/j2ee-modules. When that happens, they don't work and I cannot access them through their URL.
I deploy them using the web admin console, enable the to the cluster in question. Everything goes ok (or at least the UI says so) and in the domain.xml I have this:
<web-module availability-enabled="false" context-root="/myapp" directory-deployed="false" enabled="true" location="${com.sun.aas.instanceRoot}/applications/j2ee-modules/myapp" name="myapp" object-type="user"/>
<server...
<application-ref disable-timeout-in-minutes="30" enabled="true" lb-enabled="false" ref="myapp"/>
<cluster...
<application-ref disable-timeout-in-minutes="30" enabled="true" lb-enabled="false" ref="myapp"/>
In both the apps the were copied to the instance applications dir and in the ones that remained only in the domain applications dir (and do not work). In the latter, the location dir does not exist.
Anyone has gone through any similar situation? This deployment process is a bit confusing for me, wrt instances, clusters, domains etc.
Thanks!
Jo�o.

Thanks for the answer.
But how is this mechanism controlled? Sometimes, the domain just doesn't seem to propagate the changes to the cluster instances (or stand-alone instances). For example, sometimes when I change a property of a data source through the admin gui of the domain, it does not get propagated to the desired instance config, even after restarting the whole system.
I think that it may have something to do with the manual changes that I have to do sometimes in the domain.xml file (this is neede when you have huge config changes to be replicated in many servers).
Is there any option to enforce the replication of the config from the domain to the instances? Or at least to make it verbose so that I can realize what is going on underneath.
Thanks.

Web-module one step backwards

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for