Weird font rendering glitch in firefox

Hi all,
When I look at this webpage in Firefox this is what I get:
Notice how every occurrence of "ff" and "ft" look weird.
This is Mozilla Firefox 13.0.1.
System & Xorg info:
knarf ~ > Xorg -version
X.Org X Server 1.12.3
Release Date: 2012-07-09
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: Linux 3.4.4-3-ARCH x86_64
Current Operating System: Linux paf 3.4.4-3-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jul 3 14:36:44 UTC 2012 x86_64
Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda3 ro
Build Date: 09 July 2012 03:59:39PM
Current version of pixman: 0.26.2
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Font-related installed packages:
knarf ~ > pacman -Qs ttf
local/ttf-dejavu 2.33-3
Font family based on the Bitstream Vera Fonts with a wider range of characters
local/ttf-freefont 20120503-1
Set of free outline fonts covering the Unicode character set
knarf ~ > pacman -Qs font
local/fontconfig 2.8.0-2
A library for configuring and customizing font access
local/fontforge 20120119-1
Outline and bitmap font editor
local/fontsproto 2.1.2-1
X11 font extension wire protocol
local/freetype2 2.4.10-1
TrueType font rendering library
local/libfontenc 1.1.1-1
X11 font encoding library
local/libxfont 1.4.5-1
X11 font rasterisation library
local/libxft 2.3.1-1
FreeType-based font drawing library for X
local/ttf-dejavu 2.33-3
Font family based on the Bitstream Vera Fonts with a wider range of characters
local/ttf-freefont 20120503-1
Set of free outline fonts covering the Unicode character set
local/xorg-bdftopcf 1.0.3-2 (xorg xorg-apps)
Convert X font from Bitmap Distribution Format to Portable Compiled Format
local/xorg-font-util 1.3.0-1 (xorg-fonts xorg)
X.Org font utilities
local/xorg-font-utils 7.6-3
Transitional package depending on xorg font utilities
local/xorg-fonts-alias 1.0.2-2
X.org font alias files
local/xorg-fonts-encodings 1.0.4-3 (xorg-fonts xorg)
X.org font encoding files
local/xorg-fonts-misc 1.0.1-2
X.org misc fonts
local/xorg-mkfontdir 1.0.7-1 (xorg xorg-apps)
Create an index of X font files in a directory
local/xorg-mkfontscale 1.1.0-1 (xorg-apps xorg)
Create an index of scalable font files for X

ewaller wrote:It is interesting to note those combinations are typographic ligatures.  I'll bet two credits that is not a coincidence.
I bet my credits the fault is within the Calibri font.
You can do a font substitution for Calibri.  I made the change for all users.  Before anyone does this they might check, from the command line, what font is being used for Calibri:  'fc-match Calibri'
In /etc/fonts/conf.avail/ I added the file, 39-no-calibri.conf:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
<!-- Replace Calibri with generic fonts
bad ligatures in Calibri -->
<match target="pattern" name="family">
<test name="family" qual="any">
<string>Calibri</string>
</test>
<edit mode="assign" name="family">
<string>Arial</string>
<string>Liberation Sans</string>
<string>sans-serif</string>
</edit>
</match>
</fontconfig>
Then I symlinked to it from /etc/fonts/conf.d/:
# pwd
/etc/fonts/conf.d
# ln -s /etc/fonts/conf.avail/39-no-calibri.conf
Finally, I updated the font cache with 'fc-cache -vf'.

Similar Messages

  • Weird Font Rendering Issue?

    Okay i was looking fo some back up drives online, and i stumbled upon:
    http://www.circuitcity.com/ssm/Seagate-Barracuda-7200-9-500GB-Internal-Drive-ST3 500641ARK/sem/rpsm/oid/168899/catOid/-12976/rpem/ccd/productDetail.do
    it renders like this:
    http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/4641/picture3rn0.png
    http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture4dr1.png
    but for some reason on my MacPro 2.66 the font renders odd in FireFox (doenst do it on Safari. and ive tried this exact sit eon my MacBookPro and it looks fine on Firefox.
    I have the following installed (on both machines)
    -FireFox 2.0.0.9
    -Microsoft Office 2004
    -Adobe CS2
    -Macromedia Studio 8
    theyre practically identical with programs & fonts installed, the only fonts that are installe are the ones that wer epreinstalled with the system, and that came with Office 04 and CS2
    any way to maybe fix this issue?

    hey! well i tried your site url on my MacPro and i have the same issue, so it must be a macpro thing? lol
    im running the latest firefox and no additional fonts installed other than the ones you have listed yourself (office, cs2, macromedia)
    so dont fret. i tried using font finangler and onyx to clean the font cache, (not sure i fhtat was a good idea,) but it shows up on mine so your not the only one! ive tried on two different macpros one wiht out any programs and it does the same thing. so it must be something with the wya its rendering on these machines.
    at first it hought maybe something got corrupted in my system aswell
    hope that helps!!

  • Font rendering glitches

    Hi,
    I am getting occasional font rendering glitches.
    It appears to affect fonts in any applications, occasionally a single character will be completely messed up. see attached image.
    It appears to happen when I have an lcdfilter entry in my font config. But without this fonts don't look very good.
    lcdfilter = lcddefault or lcdlight give the problem
    lcdfilter = lcdnone or lcdlegacy are okay
    I tried installing freetype2-infinality and fontconfig-infinality as a long shot, but this didn't help.
    Anyone have any idea what might be causing this, and how to fix?
    Thanks
    P.S. I'm sorry if this post isn't perfectly categorised.
    Last edited by daulpavis (2013-10-10 09:22:38)

    Thanks. That worked.
    I found from the versions I had 2.21.12-1 was also good. 2.21.14-2 was the next version which was bad.
    For reference the most up to date version at the time, which I was originally using, is 2.21.15-1.
    If I have some time I'll try to dig into this one a little deeper.

  • Chromium weird font rendering

    Hey,
    i was wondering if anyone else has the same problem with chromium font rendering,
    i already tried setting the .Xresources as stated on wiki, but it didnt seem to take
    effect.
    I also tried the fonts.conf from this thread: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=130572
    but with no results, what i get is this:
    http://imagebin.org/209104 (left is firefox, right is chromium) in sharelatex website.
    Even the tabs text look weird.
    Anyone knows how to solve this?
    Thanks!
    EDIT: In Epiphany and chrome (in windows), look like the firefox screenie.
    Last edited by Micah89 (2012-04-21 20:00:29)

    There are some tips in here: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=139543

  • Gvim font rendering glitch

    Hello, I am having some problems with font rendering in gvim.  In a nutshell:
    When entering text into the gvim command line, characters are sometimes rendered as an empty space.  What is odd is that this is only happening to me with i3wm or twm, but not under awesome.
    More detail:
    As an example, I just typed ":e /etc/passwd" but it rendered as ":e /e  /p     d" - if the window loses focus it is repainted correctly.  It is not limited to specific glyphs, if I type: ":eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" it will render as something like ":     eee            e   eee  eee ee"
    If I run :mes to view previous messages, the final word "continue" will flicker on and off, often with the cursor.  From what I can tell, text is rendering correctly in the main editor pane.
    This is happening with multiple fonts (Inconsolata, Fixed, Source Code Pro).  Running sans vimrc (gvim -u USER -U USER) doesn't help.
    The software stack:
    gvim 7.4.16-2
    gtk2 2.24.20-1
    pango 1.34.1-1
    libxft 2.3.1-1
    i3-wm 4.6-1
    xorg-server 1.14.2-2
    xf86-video-vmware 13.0.1-1
    Linux jamehi03lx 3.0.94-1-lts #1 SMP Fri Aug 30 11:24:35 CEST 2013 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    running inside VMWare Workstation 9 on Windows 7 64-bit.
    I've tried booting with 3D acceleration enabled and disabled with the same result.
    Any troubleshooting advice? Thanks.
    -james

    cfr wrote:
    Is the problem limited to gvim? Does it occur in other X apps? in vim?
    Is everything up to date?
    Have you tried the current kernel?
    Text mode vim works fine, as does urxvt and Firefox.  I'm not sure what other apps use the same gtk2/pango stack as gvim that would be good for testing...
    Everything was up to date when I made that post, and I had rebooted after updating.  I see that the kernel and xorg have both been updated over the weekend, so I guess I'll give it another shot.
    I couldn't get the vmtools vmblock module to compile against the current kernel (enables resizing the xwindow desktop), the wiki recommended switching to the LTS kernel.
    UPDATE:  Did a pacman -Syu and rebooted and the issue is still present.
    -james
    Last edited by jhillyerd (2013-09-16 20:16:11)

  • Weird font in Safari NOT Firefox

    when I export my iWeb site to my desktop, Safari shows the main page in font NOT like I made in iWeb, but Firefox shows the web page as expected. I took off ALL shadows, all of the words are links to other pages in iWeb.
    is there a way to insert a screen grab so you can see what I am talking about?

    See my response in your other post. You could publish your site and provide the URL to it. That will give us a lot more to examine.

  • Weird font rendering

    Hi there,
    some fonts (e.g. DejaVu Sans Extralight or the default LaTeX font) render very, very ugly. See http://ubuntu-pics.de/bild/43222/shot_dTzHgC.png and http://ubuntu-pics.de/bild/43223/shot_7Nekzl.png.
    I have subpixel rendering (rgb) and antialiasing switched on on a LCD monitor (notebook). How do I get those fonts render correctly?

    Check your DPI against a machine that looks good to you.
    xdpyinfo | grep resolution

  • Weird fonts with latest Freetype2 and Firefox

    This is the weirdness I have
    And this is my fonts.conf that I don't want to edit if possible... I like hintslight
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
    <fontconfig>
    <match target="font" >
    <edit mode="assign" name="rgba" >
    <const>rgb</const>
    </edit>
    </match>
    <match target="font" >
    <edit mode="assign" name="hinting" >
    <bool>true</bool>
    </edit>
    </match>
    <match target="font" >
    <edit mode="assign" name="hintstyle" >
    <const>hintslight</const>
    </edit>
    </match>
    <match target="font" >
    <edit mode="assign" name="antialias" >
    <bool>true</bool>
    </edit>
    </match>
    </fontconfig>
    Last edited by Cimi (2007-05-06 21:14:18)

    Thank you for advices!
    I did not try to downgrade freetype, but I guess Microsoft fonts look good with older versions of freetype because there is BYTECODE_INTERPRETER enabled. Here is quote from SuSE documentation:
    In order to get a good rendering of the MS TrueType Core Fonts, the BYTECODE_INTERPRETER setting should be enabled in freetype2. The freetype people do recommend not to use the bytecode interpreter anymore in favor of their auto-hinting code. But while it is true that you will achieve good rendering with most of the free fonts, this is quite ugly for the MS TrueType Core Fonts.
    Well.. I do not want to enable features that are not recommended by developers :-)
    What about antialiasing - I do not want to enable it for small font sizes. And, of course, antialiasing is the thing that was invented not for fixing broken fonts rendering.
    I decided to replace Tahoma with Verdana everywhere to solve this problem :-) Unfortunately, I coud not do this with fontconfig - debug output from freetype shows this font list after replacement:
    "Verdana"(w) "Times New Roman"(s) "Thorndale AMT"(w) "serif"(s) ""(s)
    Note letter "w" after Verdana. I do not know what these letters mean, let's suppose 'w' is for 'weak' and 's' is for 'strong'. Firefox (or freetype) ignores 'weak' fonts when there are 'strong' fonts in the list. And all substituted fonts always have 'weak' marking... Thus, Firefox displays Times New Roman (or any font that was set as default in Firefox) instead of Verdana.
    The final solution for me was to take fontforge, make a copy of Verdana and rename this copy to Tahoma. Now I have Tahoma replaced with nice rendered Verdana everywhere
    But the question is still open - is it possible to take broken Tahoma and make same looking font that would not be broken?

  • Fonts rendering incorrectly since update to Firefox 13.0.1

    Since I updated to Firefox 13.0.1, any website using the Helvetica Neue font is rendering an outline font instead. I do have this font installed on my computer, and cannot uninstall it as I am a graphic designer and I use it all the time. Any change we can get a fix on this?
    I just pasted one example, but even this page is doing it: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/new/desktop/d1/form?search=Fonts+rendering+incorrectly+since+update+to+Firefox+13.0.1. I also know Pinterest does it.

    There may be a problem with the Helvetica Neue font if Firefox is using another font instead.
    You can do a font test to see if you can identify corrupted font(s).
    *http://browserspy.dk/fonts-flash.php?detail=1
    You can use this extension to see which fonts are used for selected text.
    *fontinfo: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/fontinfo/

  • Firefox-bin font rendering

    If I use any of the firefox-bin packages in aur, or mozilla's official tar the font rendering is just terrible and doesn't folow my system at all. Is there anyway to make these versions of firefox render fonts properly?

    The Firefox aurora and beta AUR packages use binary packages so Firefox is compiled differently than the default Arch packages. iirc, XULRunner is responsible for the font rendering. You would want to compile it to use the system's cairo library.

  • UGLY font rendering in Firefox

    Hello, my font rendering in Firefox is very ugly. I don't know what to do
    I installed ttf-google-fonts-git and also put 70-no-bitmaps.conf in my /etc/fonts/conf.d/ directory but this doesn't change anything. I reinstalled ttf-google-fonts-git and firefox but nothing.
    Here is what I got : http://f.too.gy/font-rendering.png

    (/etc/fonts/conf.d) Stewie $ ls
    10-powerline-symbols.conf           57-dejavu-sans.conf
    10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf           57-dejavu-sans-mono.conf
    20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf       57-dejavu-serif.conf
    20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf  60-latin.conf
    20-unhint-small-dejavu-serif.conf      65-fonts-persian.conf
    20-unhint-small-vera.conf           65-nonlatin.conf
    30-metric-aliases.conf               69-unifont.conf
    30-urw-aliases.conf               70-no-bitmaps.conf
    40-nonlatin.conf               75-yes-terminus.conf
    42-luxi-mono.conf               80-delicious.conf
    45-latin.conf                   90-synthetic.conf
    49-sansserif.conf               99pdftoopvp.conf
    50-user.conf                   README
    51-local.conf

  • Firefox/Thunderbird Font Rendering changed after upgrade of xulrunner

    Hi guys,
    I experienced a problem with font rendering in the mentioned applications after upgrading xulrunner from 1.9.2.10-1 to 1.9.2.10-2 today. It seems like font smoothing/subpixel rendering does not work as before. After downgrading to 1.9.2.10-1, it worked as expected again.
    To make it more clearly, here is a comparison shot of the two different renderings. The top one is before, the bottom one after the upgrade. You can see that the font at the top is rendered more smoothly.
    And here is a difference image:
    Is anything known about changes which could cause this?
    <edit>I have to correct this. The rendering in thunderbird was obviously not changed by the xulrunner upgrade, but by a separate thunderbird upgrade from 3.1.4-1 to 3.1.4-2.
    <edit2>Additional information: I have the cleartype versions of freetype2, cairo and libxft installed, if that matters.
    Last edited by Singul (2010-09-28 16:40:18)

    Although I am empathetic to the hard (and really great) job the arch devs do, I want to voice my overall agreement with softtower on this issue. Fonts have been an off and on problem for me with arch since the beginning. I understand the devs are doing the best they can, especially when the actual problem is with the moz. devs. But fonts are the major way most users interact with the system, and I can tell you that almost nothing is more aggravating, to me at least, to suddenly "upgrade" and get presented with those really crappy fonts out of the blue. Just saying I understand the frustration, and I think he makes some good points about shipping broken packages and "blaming" it on upstream. If they're broken - don't use them! if possible. "Progress" that breaks stuff isn't really progress, imo.
    hokasch wrote:
    Don't quite get what the fuzz is all about, my fonts look as crisp as ever (on a laptop lcd), the update changed absolutely nothing for me. I never used "fixed" versions of anything, can't really remember how I set up the fonts when I did this installation though (font config advice on the wiki I guess).
    It is not the repo's maintainers job to keep packages synced up with any "fixed" packages in AUR, that is your own responsibility, and bitching about it won't help you any.
    Just pointing out that comments like these aren't really helpful, imho. So you didn't have the problem - that's good to know, but the "fuzz" is about the fact that some of us *DO* have the problem.
    It typically doesn't show up on laptops, btw, only standalone LCDs for some reason (has always been the case for me, at least, with both LCDs and laptops, where the laptop never had the problem). So again, the fuss is that a major usability function got broken from an upgrade that shouldn't get broken, and imo it raises some good, if admittedly difficult to resolve, points, philosophical points, etc. about the packaging and upgrade process,

  • Font rendering in KDE 4

    I recently installed Arch (switching from Ubuntu 8.10) and decided to give KDE a try.  So far I'm mostly happy, but the font rendering isn't working so well.  There are two problems: the first is that fonts all look too thin.  The second is that most of them are way too big!  (For some reason they render properly in some places, like some sites online [e.g. Gmail], but they're way off in most applications.)
    I've tried the suggestions under "LCD" packages from the Arch fonts wiki, along with this guy's suggestions for setting up fontconfig.  I've also tried (variously) changing my DPI settings for KDM and System Settings -> Appearance -> Fonts (with aliasing anti-aliasing enabled or with system settings, and forcing the DPI to 120 or disabled).
    Oh, and I have a 15.4" widescreen 1680x1050 LCD monitor, which I think is (supposed to be) 129 DPI.
    What can I do to get fonts to look the way they should?

    hunterthomson wrote:
    OK, you problem is not with KDE. This weirded me out when I moved to Archlinux from Ubuntu too. In Archlinux you have to install all the fonts you want to use. The default fonts suck. So, You just need to install better fonts. You want the TrueType Fonts "ttf". You can install them with    pacman
    Try this to list all the font packages available.
    sudo pacman -Ss font
    These are some ones that are good
    ttf-dejavu
    ttf-freefont
    ttf-liberation
    you instal them you just do...
    sudo pacman -S ttf-liberation ttf-freefont ttf-dejavu
    Then you will want to open up the Konfiguration thing that you change the KDE configurations settings in and then change the fonts in there.
    Thanks for the tip!  I installed those (and a few others), and I definitely like (for instance) FreeSans better than the default Sans that most everything was using.  Most things look better; I think I'm going to have to tweak the hinting a bit still, but this is definitely an improvement.  Many of the things I thought were rendering related were actually just bad fonts, like you said.
    There are just a couple of problems remaining that I'm hoping will be just as easy to conquer...  First, some websites are still rendering horribly.  Take a look at this screenshot of this site, followed by this one:
    At first I figured it was a problem with Firefox (I know GTK doesn't always play nicely with KDE), but it looks the same in Konqueror.  A quick peek at the HTML for the first seems to say that it's asking for Verdana, Arial, or Helvetica...and I have Verdana and Arial installed.  (The second one calls for a ridiculous font, Palatino Linotype, which I don't have.)  Either way, though, the pages look totally wrong (the font is much too large) compared to any other machine I've seen it on (even my previous Ubuntu setup).   Does anyone know what's going on?
    One other example of font size weirdness: the digital clock plasmoid.  Here's what it looks like:
    The odd thing is that it looked like this for a while when I first installed Arch and KDE, and then played nicely for a few days...and now it's back to looking ugly.
    And finally, here are my font settings in System Settings:
    (And yes, I've rebooted since installing the new fonts and changing font settings, just in case.)
    Any more ideas?

  • Weird font being used in player

    For a while now, in my Flash player embedded in my browser
    (any browser I use), a weird font shows up for some of the text.
    Here's a
    screenshot of what I mean, taken in Firefox (you can see the
    font in the band name at top and on the song titles):
    This also occurs in some PDF documents.
    I've tried a bunch of things, including reinstalling my Flash
    player and the like. Nothing has worked. I'm going to assume it's
    an Adobe font issue, but I don't want to go into the font file and
    muck something up just yet. Plus I have no idea what I'm looking
    for.
    I'm running Mac 10.4.11 and Flash Player 9.
    Any ideas or leads? Thanks.

    You wouldn't believe the mess that ensues when I try to start using styles in a document. It doesn't happen right away, but soon, the styles conflict and don't apply or become convoluted in a way that I have to throw away the entire document before it infects my system and I have to simply start over. I hate 'styles' and I'm sure it works for somebody, but not for me. The only way I would try styles at this point would be through a college class where I could have an instructor, week after week, where I could bring back my 'mess' and have the instructor show me where I went wrong. At this point, I do not have that and experience has taught me to just don't touch that!
    Thanks Jongware, I'll try those things you recommended. Even though I have used InDesign from the day it was introduced (got rid of Quark in a hurry) there are still areas that are yet to be learned for me. What a great program it is.
    Ken

  • Font Rendering Got Bad After 32.0 Update

    After the recent update, the font started to get badly rendered. Kind of blurry with jagged edges and transparent parts. It used to be okay D:
    Sometimes it becomes okay for a moment as I scroll down on pages, and sometimes when I stop scrolling, the font stays as it is; as if there are specific positions for the text to render properly. However, not all of the fonts are affected. Only the ones inside the scroll area.
    On times that the font renders properly, the bookmarks font, title bar, and tab names are unaffected and still appear not-smooth. Same thing does not happen on other browsers. All my other system fonts look okay; it's really just Firefox.
    Restarting Firefox = didn't work
    Restarting Computer = didn't work
    Tried setting up Clear Type = didn't work
    Tried enabling and disabling Hardware Acceleration on Firefox = didn't work
    Tried enabling and disabling the Graphics card itself = didn't work
    Tried just about all of the suggestions I found on Google = none worked
    Tried complete uninstall and re-install of Firefox 32.0 = didn't work
    Graphics Driver are updated ~
    Windows is updated ~
    I'm using Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit
    Graphics AMD Radeon HD 6800
    I fixed it by downgrading to Firefox 31 which makes me sure that 32.0 is the culprit. As I was about to send the message on top; I tried downgrading as my last resort and it worked. Now I'm only sending this as a report. I am hoping you'll figure out what caused it because I am quite strict (OC) that everything in my PC must remain updated >_<; thus I want to use Firefox 32.0 as much as possible.

    No one to help on this ??????

Maybe you are looking for