WF notification in case Employee Data changes

Hello Experts,
We are looking to get some kind of notification if Infotype 8(Basic Pay) of an employee is changed. I was wondering if anyone has implement this scenario before..
We need to send some information if the basic pay changes like a workflow message to a user's sap inbox.
Please advise.
thank you very much in advance.
Mridula

Mridula,
You may use business object "BASICPAY" nad event " Changed" to trigger notifications.
Regards
SVS

Similar Messages

Employee date change after pay roll run

HI sapiers,
i have an issue
one employee join on 10th of the may but in sysytem it was enterd as 13th of the may
and pay roll was processed to that employee
now can we change the employe join date now
if yes how can we do this
please help me its urrgent
thanks in advance
shjish khan

Hi Shajish,
There are three scenarios when you may need to change hiring date:
1) After payroll is run - when hiring date is before actual Hiring date.
2) After payroll is run when hiring date is after actual Hiring Date.
3) Before the payroll is run.
1) PA30 -- Copy actions info type - action type - incorrect entry -- save and come out PA 30 copy actions info type -- action type - correct entry - now correct your entries, save your date is changed.
2) PA30 - Utilities - change payroll status - delete accounted to field, save and come out - then again utilities change entry leaving date - correct the hiring date - save and come out.
3) PA30 - Utilities change entry/leaving date change your date and save.
Try this aslo
Go to PA30
Enter personnel number.
Select action infotype.
Select subtype hire mini master record.
Change to new date.
Under reasons, select new position.
Click save.
Please refer the below links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/48/35c5c34abf11d18a0f0000e816ae6e/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/48/35c5c34abf11d18a0f0000e816ae6e/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/1b/3e5c16470f11d295a100a0c9308b52/frameset.htm
Also we have several threads in the forum related to this.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1185695
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1185695
http://scn.sap.com/thread/2012142
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1466306
Thanks,
Madhav

Data Change Notification

Hi All,
I am asked to implement Oracle 10g Data Change Notification-DCN feature in one of our prod database.
I have configured the same and found that PL/SQL call out is capturing all DMLs and notification is being triggered.
I am configuring DCN on 10.2.0.3 running on RHEL 5.I believe,Oracle internally process the notification handle through trigger which may cause performance degradation.
I wanted to know performance impact of DCN.
Can i look forward have performance statistics or proc/cons of this feature?
Regards,
Bhavik Desai

Bhavik,
See if the following post(s) server your purpose:
DBMS_CHANGE_NOTIFICATION
http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/10g/dbms_change_notification_10gR2.php
Oracle® Database PL/SQL Packages and Types Reference 10g Release 2
http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14258/d_chngnt.htm
Regards,
Naveed.

Data Change Notification and streams

Hi,
I would like to know if Data Change Notification has something related with Streams.
At first glance, I would say no, but I cannot find any tech article to confirm this.
Can anyone help ?
Regards,
Gilles

Which version number ? Database ? 11g or 10g, whatever.
I am not sure DCN is based on AQ.
DCN does not need aq_tm_processes to be non null. It only needs job_queue_processes.
So, it let me suppose that it does not use AQ.
And I can find no technote describing the foundations of DCN.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/11gr1_db/appdev/dcn/dcn.htm
Any idea ?

Employee hiring date change

hai
actual hiring date of the employee date is 01.06.2000
in SAp hiring date it is 0104.2006
the pay roll has been run for him for the minth of april
now i want to change the persons hiring date to 01062000
any suggestions
regards
nalla

Hi Manoj,
If you have ran the payroll and posted to FI, it is very hard to reconcile. And even more difficlt if the data has been submit to Revenue Dept. or related external org. Please SAP note 41523 for more information.
If the payroll has not been run yet, you can change the entry date by PA41.
Actually, most of my project records the joining data in IT0041 - Date Specifications.
ECTSAKC

Billing due date change

I would like to know why my billing due date is being changed. I have been a long standing customer of AT&T back even when it was Cingular. I do not want my billing date changed at all. I have electric and car payment due at the middle of the month. Also it would have been nice if someone would have at least called me and gave me the decency of asking. I'm still trying to figure out how last month I got charged almost $100 over my normal bill.
Sincerely
Rebecca [edited for privacy-please do not post personal or unique information such as but not limited to full names, employee ID numbers, email addresses, phone numbers, account numbers, etc.]

You can logon to your account and check bill details to find out why you were charged more.
ATT is standardizing the billing so that all customers have 3 weeks to pay their bill. It should have changed the dues date by only a few days.
If that is no the case, call support and see if they can change the date.

Report RPUFIXDS deleting employee data

Dear Experts,
I have a scenario wherein the report RPUFIXDS is deleting data for employees linked to the same CP.
As per the standard documentation,
Personnel numbers 1 and 2 have Molga 10 (USA) and belong to the same person (CP). Therefore, certain infotypes (0002, 0006, 0009) are grouped for these personnel numbers. If data exists in these infotypes for pernr 1 but not for pernr 2, there is an inconsistency. This inconsistency is repaired by report RPUFIXDS as follows:
1. If the personnel numbers are repaired in the sequence 1, 2, the data from the grouped infotypes of pernr 1 is copied to the grouped infotypes of pernr 2.
2. If the personnel numbers are repaired in the sequence 2, 1, the grouped infotypes of pernr 1 are deleted.
My scenario involves a personnel being converted from a contractor to an employee wherein the contractor and employee assignments are separate, within the same country and are linked to each other via the same CP. When I try to process employee pernr which has IT0002, IT0006 and IT0009 data maintained, through the report, it should, as per the above logic, update the contractor pernr with the relevant data for the grouped infotypes. However, the report deletes the data in IT0002, IT0006 and IT0009 for the employee pernr instead of updating the contractor pernr details. I've observed many such cases wherein data is being deleted when it should actually be updated as per report logic.
I have checked the standard documentation thoroughly and notes 783499, 1822293 and 1447867 and was unable to find any information pertaining to my case.
I would be very greatful if you could shed some light on this scenario and the behaviour of the report herein.
Thank you,
Mayank

The note given by stuart will explain this in detail to add further, Please read the reports documentation in Se38, as it does list why it deletes the data and its no way knowing in report output to prevent BADI needs to be implemented mentioned again in reports doc check here http://scn.sap.com/thread/3326684 - recommend solution is to implement a customer-own BADI implementation of BADI HRPA_SHARING_REPOR in order to determine the correct repair sequence (i.e. determine the leading PERNR with consistent data) and to avoid that a PERNR without data is chosen as leading PERNR You can use the BADI HRPA_SHARING_REPOR to change the sequence of personnel numbers that should be repaired by the report, ie give the preference to the contractors, we had a similar issue and did it by ordering them correctly. Hope it helps/

How to set Authorisation to view and maintain employee data.

Hi,
     I have a requirement to restrict the user to view and maintain all employee data except some manager position for some company codes. How can I do this .
Cheers
Senthil

Hi,
(This is what we had done....)
Check the composite role : SAP_EMPLOYEE_ERP
Create a Z role for SAP_EMPLOYEE_ERP;
Will prompt you to copy the corresponding roles in it to z roles.
The z-composite role is then assigned to the user.
While creating an ESS user, to to restrict access to personnel master data, changes in the authorization P_ORGIN needs to be done.
In our case, check the z-role created ; zSAP_ESSUSER_ERP.
In Authorizations tab=>Display authorization data option => ;
Expand Human Resources;
In HR : Master data, you can find the various authorization assignments to P_ORIGIN;
Authorization level (AUTHC)
Infotype (INFTY)
Personnel Area (PERSA)
Employee Group   (PERSG)
Employee Subgroup (PERSK)
Subtype (SUBTY)
Organizational Key (VDSK1)
Authorization level (AUTHC) takes the values :
R (Read)          : for Read access
M (Matchcode) : for Read access to Input helps (F4)
W (Write)         : for Write access
S (Symmetric) : for Write access using the Symmetric Double Verification Principle
*                      : always includes all other authorization levels simultaneously
E and D (Enqueue and Dequeue) :
for Write access using the Asymmetrical Double Verification Principle. E allows the user to create and change locked data records and D allows the user to change lock indicators.
In your case probably you need to consider for :
Employee Group   (PERSG) / Employee Subgroup (PERSK)
the Authorization level set to R for the defined infotypes.
This is again, Basis work....
Please Check the links to get more clue :
http://www.*********************/hr_security/hr_security.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/70/b7b83b5b831f3be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Hope this helps you!!
Cheers and Good Luck!!
Remi

Hiding Employee data from the Standard Compensation Page.

Hello All-
We are using the standard Iview for Compensation planning. In this page once we select the org unit for comp. adjustment we can see the list of all employees and their adjustments. If we click on any employee then a new window will popup which is having the following sub parts ( Employee General data, compensation eligibility, compensation guidelines, Salary Survey). In the Salary Survey we see different parts like Salary Range, Survey Data, Employee Data.
We have a business reason to hide the Employee Data. So Is there any backend SAP tables that I can use to hide this data? or is there any way to hide this data?
Thanks-
Chakri.

Hi Chackri!
In this case u cant make the change at view.
May be a second option is make a copy of RFC, Webdynpro and ours structures (used inside RFC) and change the aplication. If you make the copy, you need a new deploy of model data and metadata inside Portal.
Is not elegant, but works...
Best Regards!

IDOCs to send Employee Data

Hi All,
In my current project, I have lots of interfaces to send employee data to third party. Now the interface team has decided to use IDOCs to transfer employee data. Employee data is of the order of 20,000 and many interface will be scheduled to run daily. So here are my questions:
1. Earlier decided approach was to use file interface. Is IDOC better in this case?
2. Over and above this, they want to generate 1 IDOC per employee data (if the interface has to run every business day, then ~5 Million IDOCs per year and this is just for one interface). Do you think this is the right approach?
Appreciate you responce.
Cheers,
Bhaskar

Hi Bhaskar,
My humble thoughts on the questions you have asked,
1. Earlier decided approach was to use file interface. Is IDOC better in this case?
Well, the first questions is does this third party application have an SAP connector to transact IDOCs or do you have a middleware in between? Now, if you dont have a middleware/third party application doesn't support IDOC Communication, then you will have to look at file interface(or other possible means)
Anyways assuming that an IDOC communication is indeed possible between the two systems with/without a middleware in between, the advantages of IDOC over file interface is many
1) IDOCs use transactional RFC (which is asynchronous in nature , but i guess you know this already), which assures QOS EO - Exactly Once.
2) IDOCs provides superior monitoring, audit and reconciliation capabilities, which you would have to code for yourself in File interface.
3) IDOCs - More structured and organized programming, hence easy to maintain over time.
4) Standard IDOCs are available which can deployed immediately by doing some configurations, and any custom requirement can be coded in using customer enhancements.
2. Over and above this, they want to generate 1 IDOC per employee data (if the interface has to run every business day, then ~5 Million IDOCs per year and this is just for one interface). Do you think this is the right approach?
You can definitely use IDOC archiving, and also i guess in real time scenario, you would want to send the delta changes w.r.t the data of an employee and not send the complete master data on a daily basis.
All said, if this is a one time run/an interface which might be scrapped in near future, with no need of advanced monitoring and audit capabilities you might still want to go with File interface, i am sure you will get more informative replies from experts on this forum, so keep watching the thread
Regards,
Chen

Send notification on pre-defined date

Hi All,
I have a simple requirement which seems a bit difficult to achieve in CRM On Demand. I need the system to send out a notification on a (predefined) date with the warning that a contract is to expire soon. However when the contract is extended in the mean time there is no need to send out the notification anymore. Instead in case the contract is extended a notification should be set at the new date. Anyone knows how to achieve this?
The problem is that when you use a wait action to wait for the notification date it doesn't check whether that date has been changed in the mean time but just continues at the date determined at the time the WF was triggered.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards, Tim

Make the predefined date field a required field. Let's call it Defined_Date
Workflow 1
Record Type: Contract
Event: When new record saved
Condition: ([<IndexedBoolean0>] IS NULL OR [<IndexedBoolean0>] = "N")
Note: IndexedBoolean0 is the field named Indexed Checkbox in the list of fields
Workflow 1 - Actions
1. Action = Wait
Date Time Expression = [<Defined_Date>]
Reevaluate Rule Conditions After Wait = Y
Workflow 2
Record Type: Contract
Event: When new record saved
Condition: ToChar([<Defined_Date>], "MM/DD/YYYY") = ToChar(Today(), "MM/DD/YYYY") AND ([<IndexedBoolean0>] IS NULL OR [<IndexedBoolean0>] = "N")
Workflow 2 - Actions
1. Action = Wait
Period: 0 Minutes
Reevaluate Rule Conditions After Wait = N
2. Action = Field Update After Wait
Field Name = Indexed Checkbox
Value = "Y"
Overwrite Existing Values = Y
3. Action = Email
Configure the email action as needed
Workflow 3
Record Type: Contract
Event: When modified record saved
Condition: ToChar([<Defined_Date>], "MM/DD/YYYY") = ToChar(Today(), "MM/DD/YYYY") AND ([<IndexedBoolean0>] IS NULL OR [<IndexedBoolean0>] = "N")
Workflow 3 - Actions
1. Action = Wait
Date Time Expression = [<Defined_Date>]
Reevaluate Rule Conditions After Wait = Y
2. Action = Field Update After Wait
Field Name = Indexed Checkbox
Value = "Y"
Overwrite Existing Values = Y
3. Action = Email
Configure the email action (exactly the same as previous email action)

Open Transactions in ECC for Master Data changes in MDM

Hi All,
I have a basic Design question on how to handle the impact of Data changes in MDM for any open transactions with that Master object. For eg if we have a Material set up in MDM and in ECC and there are open Purchase Orders for that Material, now if the Base Unit of Measure is changed in MDM and gets harmonized to ECC(After Workflow approval of the Change) how will it impact the PO attached to the material . Can we do any configuration in ECC that will restrict any Open PO s not to take the new changed value and any new POs taking up the new Base Unit of Measure , or can we set up an alert/notification that will trigger for a PO whenever any Master Data is changed and the PO takes the new changed value on the fly . What will be the best approach from a solution point of view .
Thanks ,
Prabuddha

Hi Prabuddha,
In ECC if a change happens to a master data not all the changes are reflected automatically in the open documents like open PO or open Sales order. Some fields values have to be redetermined for eg: "pricing procedure", some of them needs to be changed manually for eg: "Description". Moreover specific to your eg of Base unit of measure, this is a sensitive field and has lot of impact on the process so there for changing such fields it is necessary to close all the open documents against the Master data record in consideration. This fact is regardless whether the change happens through an IDoc or directly by MM02/XK02/XD02
Prabudha, Please revert if you have further questions.
Best Regards
P T Manoj
Edited by: PT MANOJ on Sep 2, 2011 10:25 PM

Delivery date changed 4 times-called to ask what is going on and then best buy cancelled order

I ordered a 55 inch aquos with free ROKU stick for $599.00 on Sept. 22 (removed per forum guidlelines) and got a confirmed delivery of Sept. 26. Unfortunately, I received a call in the morning of the Sept. 26 and was told that delivery was pushed to Tues, Sept. 30.
On Monday, Sept. 29, I received an automated call informing me that the Tv will be delivered on Sept. 30 between 3:30 and 5:30. and I also received an email with the same information. Thirty minutes later I received another email stating that the delivery is again being pushed to Oct. 13. so I called customer service. I was told he can change the delivery date to Oct. 3 but call in the morning to confirm availability with warehouse.I called customer service on Sept. 30 to confirm availability and was assured that the Tv will be delivered on Oct. 3.
On Thursday Oct. 2nd, I received another email stating the order will not be delivered until Oct. 16. I remained calm and called customer service and after a very long hold time I was able to speak with a representative and again after a long hold to check what is going on, she informed me that the order is now cancelled since the item is discontinued. I told the representative that I already lost 3 days of work due to the delivery dates changing and since the TV has to be accepted by somebody 18 years or older I needed to be home. I asked if it is unreasonable to ask for the same exact TV but 1 size bigger since the 60 inch is available and in stock (but without the ROKU stick) but unfortunately I was told it is not possible. I asked to speak with a supervisor but they are all busy but she asked for my phone number so they can call me back in 20 min.. I waited but did not get a back from the supervisor the same day.
I called again today, Friday, Oct. 3 and I was assisted by a nice lady who after explaining my situation was sincere with her apology. She told me that she will call me back so she can speak with a supervisor about my situation. I asked her too if it is unreasonable to ask for the same exact TV but next size bigger since the one I was sold is no longer available and I lost 3 days of work due to the 3 changes in delivery dates. She affirmed that it is fair but have no authority to make decissions but will relay the history of the order to her superior so they can make a proper resolution.
After about 15 minutes I got a call back and was told that since the bigger TV is priced at 799.00 they will give me a 50.00 dsicount for the trouble. I declined the offer since I feel that $50.00 dollars for getting the run around and missing 3 days of work is not proper compensation and is an insult to any customer. I thanked her for trying and informed her that I am aware that it is not her fault and it is management who made this decission.
I sincerely feel that I should have been given the next size TV for the same price of my original purchase and I should have been given a ROKU stick (which I did not ask for) for my unpleasant experience.
We are $150.00 apart from getting a resolution but management feels like it is the right thing to do for cases like these. Being a best buy customer for many years, spending many thousand of dollars, I am puzzled why best buy would treat any customer the way they treated me. Please explain the policy so I can have a better understanding. The $150.00 difference can easily be recopued from my next purchase. In my opinion, it is not a very smart business practice to lose a customer this way. Again, please explain the policy to me so I can understand better.

Hello romcarlos1,
While unforeseen complications can cause unexpected delays, it seems something went wrong at every turn. Misinformation and multiple missed appointments would frustrate me too, and I can only imagine this frustration turned into aggravation with the poor service you describe. After pulling up your account, I noticed that has been two weeks since your TV purchase, and I’m sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused. I appreciate you allowing me the opportunity to explain what should have happened.
When your delivery day arrives, you should receive a call from us to narrow down the time frame to a 4-hour window. This is done because our delivery agent’s schedule isn’t fully determined until the day of service as our customer’s needs may change prior to the delivery date. These routes are then best optimized to fit the appointments scheduled for the day. The particular television you wished to purchase is quite popular, however, and due to high demand, it’s currently on backorder in some areas of the country. This may explain why your delivery date was continuously pushed back unexpectedly, and why we needed to reschedule multiple times.
While in backordered status, however, an online order may be cancelled if you don’t wish to wait any longer and a different model may be purchase. Upon review of your order, I noticed that it was canceled upon your request. If you have since changed your mind and wish to wait for one to arrive, you may place a new order here.
It sounds like you wish to purchase a new TV entirely though, so I understand if you don’t wish to attempt a new order. While I cannot guarantee you a different outcome than the resolution already offered, I’d be glad to look into your case to see what other options may be available. Please know I have sent you a private message to collect further information from you. You may view this by logging into the forum and clicking on the envelope in the upper right-hand corner of the page.
Respectfully,
Alex|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

Is anyone else having problems with an iPhone 6 delivery date changing on them?

I sat up until 12:01am to pre order (2) iPhone 6's and (2) iPhone 6 +'s and they had a delivery date of 9/19 for both of the phones at the time I logged on to Verizon's preorder site. The system would not allow me to log in as an existing customer but it would allow me to order as a new customer. I kept trying to order new phones as an existing customer on two different computers and three different browsers without any luck. I finally decided to order them as a new customer and the order went right through the Verizon system without any problem. Two minutes later I received an email from Verizon requesting that I call them as soon as possible to complete the order. I called in and spoke to a rep that explained that I already was an existing customer and that I would need to use the "Existing Customer" preorder link. I explained the issues I was having and she said that I would still need to use that system when it was available. So I tried the existing customer link and it now let me through but the date for the iPhone 6 plus had slipped to 10/7 (It is now 1:30 am). I completed the transaction and it stated 9/19 delivery for iPhone 6 and 10/7 for the iPhone Plus. However once I received the email confirmation it stated that the delivery date for the phones was 10/7. I called Verizon customer service and stated my concern about the later delivery date for the iPhone 6 and they told me that the iPhone 6's would arrive on the 19th and the pluses would arrive on 10/7 so I did not change my order. This morning 9/19 8:00am I called in to inquire about my shipping confirmation numbers for the (2) iPhone 6's and the customer service rep (Robanya) told me that he would call me back at 1:00pm PST and give me the shipping confirmation numbers. He asked specifically which phone number he should call me back on and I gave him my cell number. After not receiving a call back from Robanya, I called Verizon customer service at 5:30pm and spoke Ryan James and he confirmed that the orders were placed on the 12th of Sept and that one system showed all of them due to be delivered 10/7. After insisting that Robanya that I spoke with earlier in the day said they were shipping today, Ryan got off the phone for 5-10 mins and then got back on and said that the iPhone 6's shipped yesterday on the 18th but he did not have a confirmation number. After pressing him that someone should have this confirmation number in Verizon he stated that the delivery dates were subject to change and that all the phones would probably ship on 10/7 and left it at that.
So after loosing sleep to pre order phones on Verizon, speaking with (3) different Verizon reps, I am rewarded by having my delivery date changed to 10/7 on my iPhone 6's which is the same delivery date they were quoting yesterday 9/18.
Did any one else have the same disappointing experience that I had?

Yes, pre-ordered iPhone 6 with a guaranteed delivery date of 19 September; took screen shots after the order just to have record of it.
Called Verizon 18 Sept because I hadn't received a tracking number yet, and was informed my phone would now ship 7 October. When I expressed that was different than what was promised and had proof, a manager came on the phone and confirmed that I should have a 19 Sept delivery date based on their records. She told me however she could not confirm when my order would ship.
19 Sept came and went with no phone delivery. I have tried calling Verizon, posting here, and posting on their FB page for customer service. Every rep I talked to (except for the first manager on 18 Sept) has been unable to admit that they mislabeled their product sales page, and mislead the customer. One rep told me the guaranteed delivery date was an "estimate"; when I asked her to show me on the website where it uses the term "estimate", she admitted it didn't communicate that, but still was unable to utter the words "we made a mistake".
VZW needs to take a 101 class in customer service and crises management; rule #1 is if you screw up, admit it! I know I am not going to get my iPhone as promised, but pretending like there is nothing wrong with that customer service experience is just making things worse. Not a single employee I have communicated with to date has attempted to do anything proactive to correct or mitigate the customer failure. I am truly amazed at how poorly VZW has been handling this to date; again (removed) happens with supply/demand, website errors, etc, but the failure to acknowledge how the screw up shafted a lot of (formally) loyal long time customers is criminal.
>> Edited to comply with the Verizon Wireless Terms of Service <<
Edited by: Verizon Moderator

Auto update of PO price after del. date change

We use price date category=2 , "Delivery date" for our materials. In ME22N, the delivery date is changed. Message 06 484 appears at the bottom of the screen,
"Delivery date changed (new price determination process may be necessary)".
We want to have the new price determination automatically carried out when the delivery date changes in the PO. If you change other fields like purchasing org. or plant, the price is automatically redetermined.

It depends on the costing method of the org and the distribution details of the PO.
Typically, for avg. costing, it is not possible because that will alter the way the transaction was costed.
But for a std. costing org, it may be possible.
You will have to setup the test cases for your org and see.
Sandeep Gandhi

WF notification in case Employee Data changes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for