What exactly is a shared hyperlink destination?

Well, nothing in the documentation explains what a "shared hyperlink destination" actually is. The very name itself ("shared hyperlink destination") implies that you've got two separate links in your document both pointing to, say, adobe.com (the destination). Those two links 'share' the same destination (= adobe.com).
But, Sandee says a "Shared Destination":
"creates a link to a previously defined hyperlink"
i.e. it creates a link to a link?
Did she mean to say:
"creates a link to a previously defined hyperlink source"? or
"creates a link to a previously defined hyperlink destination"?

Never did. Asked again

Similar Messages

Unchecking "Shared Hyperlink Destination" causes InDesign CS5.5 to crash

This occurs on multiple Macs (running either Leopard or Snow Leopard) in our office. The links are connected to conditional text in InCopy. Here's the scenario:
1) Open the InDesign document and select the linked text.
2) Get a dialog box: "You must check out the contents of this frame in order to make changes. Check out now?" Click "Yes."
3) Copy the text of the link, right-click and select "New Hyperlink."
4) In the "New Hyperlink" window, paste in the text of the URL (leaving in the http://).
5) Uncheck "Shared Hyperlink Destination." InDesign immediately crashes.
I've been told by our designers that you have to uncheck "Shared Hyperlink Destination" to prevent changes to all of the other related links in the document. I don't work with InDesign on a regular basis and have very limited knowledge of InCopy. I tested the current version of InDesign (7.5.3) on my Mac and the same crash occurred.
Here is the first part of the crash report:
Process:         Adobe InDesign CS5.5 [6458]
Path: /Applications/Adobe InDesign CS5.5/Adobe InDesign CS5.5.app/Contents/MacOS/Adobe InDesign CS5.5
Identifier: com.adobe.InDesign
Version: 7.5.2.318 (7520)
Code Type:       X86 (Native)
Parent Process: launchd [3125]
Interval Since Last Report:          4473638 sec
Crashes Since Last Report:           38
Per-App Interval Since Last Report: 2159305 sec
Per-App Crashes Since Last Report:   15
Date/Time: 2012-05-03 12:29:26.452 -0700
OS Version:      Mac OS X 10.5.8 (9L31a)
Report Version: 6
Anonymous UUID: 14200E2C-6A0E-4571-B96F-268BF9F135D1
Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGBUS)
Exception Codes: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at 0x0000000000000000
Crashed Thread: 0
Thread 0 Crashed:
0 ...e.InDesign.Hyperlinks Panel      0x23929fa5 GetPlugIn + 117525
1 ...e.InDesign.Hyperlinks Panel      0x2392b103 GetPlugIn + 121971
2 ...e.InDesign.Hyperlinks Panel      0x2393f28a GetPlugIn + 204282
3 ...adobe.InDesign.AppFramework            0x19697e37 GetPlugIn + 45687
4 ...adobe.InDesign.AppFramework            0x196983f9 GetPlugIn + 47161
5 PublicLib.dylib                  0x01786b49 CSubject::Change(IDType<ClassID_tag>,

Thanks to you both. Excuse my ignorance - I presumed that 7.5.3 was a paid-for-upgrade to Creative Suite 6 (or higher?!)... I thought I had the Updater set to prompt me for updates, but I obviously didn't.
Anyhow - I've since run the updater, but the crash happens the same way. Here's the new crash report.
http://pastebin.com/JNvtTRbn
Hopefully there's something of use in this - I really don't want to have to manually do this: I have nearly 200 film titles that need to be listed in alphabetical order with their respective page number, and the TOC feature would be the perfect solution if it actually worked...
As a matter of interest, how stable is Creative Suite 6 / Creative Cloud? Worth the leap?

Script to uncheck "Shared Hyperlink Destination" in urls

Is there a script or an automated way to make all hyperlinks not be "Shared Hyperlink Destination". I have 250+ hyperlinks that are shared, but are causing problems when i copy them to a new document.
Is there a preference somewhere to set it up so it doesn't happen in the future?
thanks in advance. mike.

This Applescript deletes all of the hyperlinks:
tell application "Adobe InDesign CC 2014"
    delete every hyperlink of active document
end tell
and this deletes the hyperlinks and the swatches and character styles named "Hyperlink":
tell application "Adobe InDesign CC 2014"
    tell active document
        delete every hyperlink
        try
            delete (every swatch whose name is "Hyperlink")
            set n to every character style whose name is "[None]"
            delete (every character style whose name is "Hyperlink") replacing with item 1 of n
        end try
    end tell
end tell

Shared Hyperlink Destination now works with DPS

The new revamped Hyperlinks panel automatically makes character style and color swatch to coloring links and now we can use Shared Hyperlink Destination function in DPS projects.

The new revamped Hyperlinks panel automatically makes character style and color swatch to coloring links and now we can use Shared Hyperlink Destination function in DPS projects.

Shared Hyperlink Destinations Unpleasantness

Where I work, we've upgraded from CS1 to CS6.
We've created many newsletters in InDesign (40+ pages each; 1 per month) that have hyperlinks.
Working with the Hyperlinks and Hyperlink Destinations, while rather cumbersome before, was manageable.
However, in CS6 an aspect of it makes them unworkable.
First off, we're working in a new newsletter that has essentially been opened and converted from a previous month's CS1 version to the new CS6. It carries forward all the previous hyperlinks, naturally. However, InDesign treats all of these as "shared" hyperlinks.
So, when I have to troubleshoot a link, I can straight up delete the link and create a new, unshared URL-type link.
No real problem, except having to write down where the link goes and retype it into the new link creation dialog, since I can't select the original and copy & paste it.
However, if I accidentally forget to avoid opening Hyperlink Destinations like the plague, then all the Destinations created previously in CS1 will be accessed in order to open that pallet. Since all "shared" Destinations are stored in whatever original document they were made in apparently, that means InDesign will open and convert effectively every single CS1 INDD that still shares a link in common or that still has a Destination listed in the palette ... or something.
This process takes about 1 hour (or more) and effectively hangs InDesign for me. I can not cancel the process (that I've found yet); I can not close the palette before it's refreshed and processed every single Destination; I have to manually hit Esc or click cancel on every single Destination as it tries opening it if I wish to try short-circuiting the process (which means I'll still have to sit there for at least half an hour, since there's so much time between each dialog that pops up).
I'm not the one who generally works in the file doing all the design work; I'm the one who does the processing for creating the PDF for the web. I'm willing to understand and work with InDesign to a fuller extent of its capabilities, but the actual designers are generally as ignorant as they can get away with about InDesign's tools and innards.
They're the ones that work with and create the links (until there's a problem, then it's me); and getting them to clean up their methods or to at least only create "unshared" hyperlinks going forward is pretty much impossible.
If somebody doesn't know a way to get around this problem, then I have a request that an update to InDesign is implemented to accomplish any of several things:
• All "old" Hyperlink Destinations are not created as shared ones, thereby avoiding InDesign's desire to open and convert all the old INDD files.
• All shared Destinations are stored elsewhere, not in their original INDD (or whatever is going on with them right now).
• Implement a method to short-circuit this update process (like hitting Esc exits the opening of the Hyperlink Destinations palette, or prevents the action if I masochistically try selecting and editing a Hyperlink Destination once it opens, etc).
Thank you, especially if there's any help getting around the problem short of me deleting all Hyperlink Destinations (once I get the palette open and sitting still again) to force the designers to start over.

> I'm trying to create links from a webpage to specific spots in a pdf.
This makes it sound like you need links from a webpage to a PDF.
> I can get it to work perfectly if I create the hyperlink destinations
> in the pdf, using the Acrobat software.
But this makes it sound like you need links from a PDF to a webpage.
> When I try it, though, I can't get the
> webpage link to go to the destination, only to the top of the pdf.
And this makes it sound like you're linking from webpage to PDF.
Which one are you doing?
1) If you want a link from a webpage to a PDF, the link must be in the
webpage.
2) If you want a link from a PDF to a webpage, the link must be in the PDF.
I can help you with #2. I could probably help you with #1 too, but I
don't think I would use Indesign.
Kenneth Benson
Pegasus Type, Inc.
www.pegtype.com

Need help with shared hyperlinks

I need help understanding the shared hyperlink option when creating hyperlinks in InDesign CS5 (Mac) and how to change a shared hyperlink destination.
I want to build a document that contains hyperlinks to files on the client’s server. The end use is to make a PDF in which the client can click on a hyperlink and it opens (for example) a Word document or another PDF on their server. When I started the project, I thought I would create shared hyperlinks because a single server document would be referred to by several links scattered through the InDesign document I was building.
From the Hyperlink palette fly-out menu I chose New Hyperlink, then Link To: File from the dropdown, and I clicked the Shared Hyperlink option, and then OK to close the window. I export the InDesign file as a print PDF, and the hyperlinks work.
Now I need to change the file paths, because the client moved their files to a new location. When I re-open the hyperlink in the Hyperlink palette by double clicking on it, the Edit Hyperlink window opens but it shows my link as:
Link To: Shared Destination (rather than File)
And the destination box underneath shows:
Document: [my document name]
Name [the file path I put in]
However, this link is not editable. I don’t understand why InDesign does this on its own.
I realize now that it was not necessary to tick the shared option when I built the hyperlink. Is there a way (a script? another method?) that I can remove the shared nature of the hyperlinks so that when I go to edit them they show as links to files (Link to: File, not Link to: Shared Destination) with a live Destination Path box where I can edit the link?
(If anyone tries to help with a script, note that my document also contains other hyperlinks to internet URLs and emails that I don’t want to disturb.)
Thanks for your consideration.

Well. I do feel sort of bait-and-switched, but...
I want to get the links back to the point where double clicking on the hyperlink name (number) in the Hyperlink palette opens an Edit Hyperlink dialog where the destination is Link to: File and the file path shows up in the File Path box as an editable string. Just the way I made them in the first place.
It's good that you're comfortable editing the IDML.
If you compare links made both ways in the IDML, the only distinction between the Shared and the not Shared seems to be the hidden attribute of the <HyperlinkURLDestination/> tag.
Allegedly you cannot edit this in Javascript (though you could, I suppose, create a new HyperlinkURLDestination with all the same properties and then chang eeach hyperlink to point to it).
But editing it in the IDML works fine. Open designmap.xml and change the Hidden="false" to Hidden="true". Of course, you only want to do that in the <HyerplinkURLDestination/> tags...
Something about this seems fishy to me, so you might want to verify it yourself in a single case before you put too much effort in. But I think it's right.

What exactly does the Work Offline option do in a shared review hosted on an internal server?

Hi,
What exactly does the Work Offline option do in a shared review hosted on an internal server?
I *think* it simply disconnects you from the review server. I'm not sure why one would want to do this.
I'm trying to recommend an offline workflow for reviewers who may not be able to access a shared review hosted on our internal server (for example, while traveling). These reviewers would like to be able to comment on an offline version of the review PDF and then publish their comments when they can again connect to the Internet/internal server.
It doesn't seem like "Work Offline" is the right fit for this scenario. Instead, should reviewers save a local copy to their hard drive, comment on it, and then, when reconnected to the Internet, open the local copy, click Reconnect to Server, and then click Publish Comments?

Thanks, Dave. So for my hypothetical traveling reviewer, it would be reasonable to suggest the following steps for an offline workflow?
1. Connect to the shared review.
2. Choose Work Offline from the Server Status menu.
3. Close and save the review PDF locally.
4. Comment while traveling.
5. When back in the office, open the local copy of the review PDF.
6. Click Reconnect to Server.
7. Click Publish Comments.

Cross-references to hyperlink destinations (text anchors) results in file slowdown

I'm using text anchors for the first time in a 12-file book (~280 pages) for the table/figure list in the front matter. There are maybe 100 or so total cross-references in the front matter in tables (where one column is the text of the figure title and one column the page number).
About halfway through the process of adding the cross references, things got reallllly slow, and only in that one document. So slow that reformatting became almost impossible, because of the delays.
So I went through many of the usual troubleshooting steps, just in case. Trashed preferences, trashed the style, etc. I exported the file to IDML and created a new file from that. It helped, but I can tell that it's still not quite so snappy.
My question, then, is if this is to be expected with what may be a large number of hyperlinks/text anchors? All the other files in the book act fine, so it's not an InDesign-wide slowdown. Are there any best practices when it comes to using hyperlink destinations?
As an amusing aside, before I tried the troubleshooting steps I had a clever idea--to insert the cross references into a new, blank document and then paste them into the frontmatter file. Consist and ugly crashes to desktop resulted.

George Krompacky wrote:
Peter,
Thanks for your reply. Yes, the TOC could do this and would be an easier approach. But I hadn't anticipated using it and so didn't have my ducks in a row as far as having the styles consistent for chapter titles, figures and tables. Next time I will do so. I can guess that as a TOC doesn't generate live links, it shouldn't have a performance impact like dozens of cross-references do.
Yes, the TOC is inert except when it's being generated.
Regardless of how "creatively chaotic" or "chaotically creative" your chapter, table, and figure title paragraph styles are, as long as all chapter titles are tagged with style names that are not used for figures or tables, and similarly figures and tables are not tagged with styles used for the "other," you can still generate a usable TOC. The idea is to capture all the paragraph styles for each category, and display each category's captured paragraphs as uniform TOC entries - i. e., all chapter title entries are the same, all table title entries are the same, and all table title entries are the same. If you don't want the categories intermixed, create a separate TOC for each category, place each TOC separately, unthreaded to other document frames.
If you'd like to try a few things to see if it's possible to quickly remake the TOC and regain a responsive working document, before doing anything else, save the whole project to a secure place, and work on the copy. Then:
* Move the Text tool insertion point to each cross-reference's destination by selecting the reference in the cross-reference panel and clicking the right-pointing arrow on the panel status bar; then verify that the paragraph is tagged with an appropriate style that doesn't belong to the other category of TOC items.
* After all the TOC-to-be items are identified and verified that they're tagged correctly, delete the text frame(s) that contain the TOC that's created with cross-references. All the references will break, of course. You've got the secure original project somewhere, right?
* Set up the TOC roughly; just pick the paragraph styles for each category - chapter, figure, table, and generate a TOC for the book. Drag to place the TOC on a clean new page, and DO NOT THREAD THE TOC TO NON-TOC TEXT FRAMES.
* If the extracted paragraphs are in their correct categories, you can create new TOC styles for the TOC entries, or, if they exist, assign them in the TOC setup dialog box, and regenerate.
If this result gives you a sense of what needs fixing, and you have the time, refine the TOC styles so you can get the exact appearance you want. By avoiding changing the source paragraphs in the main document, you'll avoid any risk of reflowing anything. Finally, after the project's completely done and handed off, you can spend time refining the rogue source paragraph styles, IN A COPY, for use going forward.
HTH
Regards,
Peter
Peter Gold
KnowHow ProServices

Script to split threaded story but keep hyperlink destinations?

I have a series of long CS6 documents in a book with stories running through many frames. These stories have many text anchors acting as hyperlink destinations within (and across) the files.
Each story needs to be split into separate frames.*
The script SplitStory.jsx does exactly this, but in the process it breaks my hyperlinks to destinations anchored in the text of the story being split.
The problem seems to be that a hyperlink destination does not "carry" the correct information when duplicated, and the script duplicates each frame before removing it.
A manual solution
I have found a manual way of producing the desired result:
Unlink the last frame in the thread,
Cut (not copy) the overmatter from the penultimate frame,
Paste into what was the last frame (which is now a standalone frame).
Repeat recursively until the entire story is reduced to standalone frames.
This seems crying out for a scripting solution: it may even be relatively simple? But I cannot find anything suitable and my javascript is not good enough to write one from scratch.
Could anyone offer any suggestions?
* As an aside, I need to split the stories into separate frames so that all the text on a given page gets extracted to a text file together. Otherwise all the text in the main text thread gets extracted and then our software "mops up" display quotes, etc. This is not acceptable in my scenario.

It seems that Rorohiko's plug-in TextStitch will automatically de-thread linked frames whilst preserving the destinations.
I Rorohiko

InDesign: Updating Shared Hyperlinks

What is the best approach to take for updating shared hyperlink URLs?
For example, if a document has many pages and there are various hyperlink lists within those pages, there are likely to be some shared URL destinations. If we need to update the URL to a specific destination - How do we make certain that all the shared destinations update? Or does each hyperlink have to be found and changed separately?

I got my answer thanks.
R

How to automatically create hyperlink destinations based on numbered list?

I am very new to InDesign and am creating a template for an academic journal. Each article contains a list of references at the end and the references are cited in the main text (like what you see in Wikipedia if you are not familiar with scientfic journal articles). In exported HTML, the citation in the main text should be hyperlinked to the coressponding reference in the reference list. I have two questions:
1) It is possible to ask paragraphy style to assign each numbered item a hyperlink destination? If this is possible, I can then manually inserted hyperlinks in the main text.
2) one step further, is there any way (e.g. script) which can then insert hyperlink to those destinations based on pattern match? For example, in main text, the citation to reference #1 appear in the text as [1] which should be hyperlinked to reference #1.
One more question, is there anyone who knows how academic journals handle the flow from InDesign to html? Certainly, the exported html cannot go directly online without further editing.
Thank you.

Hi Eric,
I posted the script here. But it should be adjusted to your particular document. (Anyone with basic scripting knowledge can do this). I am sure it won’t work as it is. I assume that “comments” and “references” are in two different stories.
Can I have the scripts from you (for a fee or free)?
I don't sell my scripts: they're free.
Can the scripts handle the pattens like these [3], [1-5], [3,4], [6, 8, 11-13]?
This script can't, but another handles both single page numbers and page ranges like so:
I can post it as well.
Now I’d like to make one thing clear:
I made a set of scripts for creating hyperlinks in InDesign documents for further exporting them to ePub/HTML. I can’t make a script that would work for everyone because all books are very different. I simply adjusted scripts for every book I had to work with (mainly changing GREP expressions and names of styles) and I have numerous variations of scripts. I can post them if someone is interested but you should be aware that they have to be reworked.

How do I delete this non-existent hyperlink destination?

New to Indesign.
I need to use the "Blank White" header text as a hypertext destination and I want the name of the hypertext destination to be the same as the text.
When I try, I get:
Yet, there seems to be NO hypertext definition already in existence by this name. See:
Now . . . I have been dinking around in this document for hours creating and deleting hypertext destinations, making bookmarks, trying out text variables, etc etc.
I'm afraid that all this back and forth may have screwed up my file(s) and now I've got some phantom, hidden hypertext destination I can't find and is therefore undeletable.

That's a great suggestion, and I tried it, but the undeletable Hyperlink Destination survived.
And still didn't show up in the list of already defined Hyperlink Destinations:
So, I started eliminating layers and trying again to define a new Hyperlink Destination using the name "Blank White" that was somehow taken, each time I'd delete an entire.
After nixing a few layers, I was actually able to use "Blank White" again. I kept going . . .
Once I knew the affected layer, I then narrowed it down to text object responsible. Guess which one it was . . .
Yeah, the "Blank White" header itself.
Apparently I'd used the same exact text to define two Hyperlink Destinations, and in that case the Hyperlink Destination named "Blank White" didn't show up in the Hyperlink Destination Options dialogue.
Had to delete the affected text, then re-type it and re-define my Hyperlink Destination.
geeze . . .
Steve, thanks for your help, though!

What exactly is in the LR catalog?

I can think of image location references as well as references to the corresponding preview files and Lightroom proprietary image metadata are held in the catalog, but I doubt that develop settings are there because either xml files directly alongside the images are used for that or development settings are stored in the dng files themselves. And for presets etc. Lightroom uses files in the filesystem. So what exactly is in the catalog?
Andreas

dj_paige wrote:
Everything you do to your photos in Lightroom is in the catalog.
Furthermore, there are some organisational matters that the Catalog holds, which are wider in scope than any image taken in isolation. Most critically, the Catalog discriminates which image files you have chosen to import, and which you have not imported (or have since deliberately removed).
Each Catalog has some workflow settings of its own - so one Catalog may be set to write XMP out to the files automatically, and another not to do so. Of course, the Catalog conveniently stores the last view and workspace that you had for your library, including any filtering, stacking or custom ordering of the images.
Each catalog holds a list of keywords (regardless whether these have been used or not) each with nesting, synonym and other properties.
Each Catalog provides Collections, Smart Collections, Print Collections etc which have no existence outside that Catalog.
Each Catalog can maintain Publish setups, collections, smart folders, and ongoing change-tracking relationships with external image copies either locally or online.
The same for remembered print settings of each image, page setups, softproofing settings etc
The same for Virtual Copies along with all their text and develop metadata - these are treated within the Catalog (only), as fully functional images in their own right. But if you go to the folder on disk, there is nothing to see of these whatever.
Some people put quite a lot of effort into settings which are in fact available outside LR and its Catalog, because they are "shared" with ACR. This includes processing defaults, lens and camera calibration profiles. Also some LR settings saved via a given Catalog, are centrally stored by default, so available to other LR Catalogs: chiefly develop presets, import or export presets, and the like.
Edit: I forgot one of the most important: a History of the steps carried out, giving access to all the different states that the image has passed through.

What exactly is the difference between enqueue,latch & lock

Can someone explain in simple words (with example if possible) what exactly is the difference between enqueue,latch & lock?
I have gone through documentation & other links,but just not able to figure out the exact & clear difference between these three..
Cheers,
Kunwar

In addition to links provided by Sb and nice explanations by Aman, i would like to add below :
1.Latches and enqueues are lightweight serialization devices used to coordinate multi-user access to
shared data structures, objects and files.
Latches are locks that are held for extremely short periods of time, for example the time it takes to modify
an in-memory data structure. They are used to protect certain memory structures, such as the database
block buffer cache or the library cache in the shared pool (as described in Chapter 2, Architecture). Latches
are typically requested internally in a ‘willing to wait’ mode. This means that if the latch is not available,
the requesting session will sleep for a short period of time and retry the operation later. Other latches may
be requested in an ‘immediate’ mode, meaning that the process will go do something else rather than sit
and wait for the latch to become available. Since many requestors may be waiting for a latch at the same
time, you may see some processes waiting longer than others. Latches are assigned rather randomly, based
on the ‘luck of the draw’, if you will. Whichever session asks for a latch right after it was released will get it.
There is no line of latch waiters, just a ‘mob’ of waiters constantly retrying.
Oracle uses atomic instructions like ‘test and set’ for operating on latches. Since the instructions to set
and free latches are atomic, the operating system itself guarantees that only one process gets it. Since it
is only one instruction, it can be quite fast. Latches are held for short periods of time and provide a
mechanism for clean-up in case a latch holder ‘dies’ abnormally while holding it. This cleaning up
process would be performed by PMON.
Enqueues are another, more sophisticated, serialization device, used when updating rows in a database
table, fro example. They differ from latches in that they allow the requestor to ‘queue up’ and wait for
the resource. With a latch request, the requestor is told right away whether they got the latch or not.
With an enqueue, the requestor will be blocked until they actually attain it. As such, they are not as fast
as a latch can be, but they do provided functionality over and above that which a latch can offer.
Enqueues may be obtained at various levels, so you can have many ‘share’ locks and locks with various
degrees of ‘shareability’.
Source:Expert Oracle Database Architecture by Thomas Kyte
2.Good PPT at http://nocoug.org/download/2001-05/latches.ppt
3.Good PPT by Mark bobak at http://www.mi-oaug.org/Presentations/Understanding%20Locks%20and%20Enqueues.ppt
HTH
Girish Sharma

What exactly does "Make AppleTalk Active" do?

Hi,
*System Preferences > Network > Ethernet > AppleTalk > Make AppleTalk Active*.
I would like to know specifically/technically what exactly this option does?
When connecting to OS X Macs, and Windows boxes publishing AppleTalk/AppleShare/AFP, there does not seem to be any need to have this option enabled.
However, I am in an argument with a tech support guy at the moment, who is trying to claim that unless this option is enabled, connecting via AFP [1] is not true AFP...
I know AppleTalk is a collection of protocols implemented in the 80s some time. And I know that AFP on Tiger is basically AppleShare over TCP/IP, and that AppleTalk over AppleTalk is not supported by Tiger.
I suspect the Make AppleTalk Active option is somehow related to supporting AppleTalk sharing with old Mac systems, OS9,8,7 etc. But I really need to know exactly.
Thanks.
+[1] in this case, it is relating to sharing files between Tiger 10.4.10 systems and a Windows XP based RIP which is publishing some flavour of AppleShare.+

Chris--
My understanding is that AppleTalk is the protocol, like TCP/IP is a protocol. That's what this page implies to me:
http://www.protocols.com/pbook/appletalk.htm
So, at its inception, AppleTalk was a network transport protocol. There was a time when you could build an AppleTalk network without using TCP/IP, TCP/IP was only for the Internet (if you even knew what that was). You would just connect up some cables (not even ethernet, necessarily), and you'd get a network. It was pretty slow, but ethernet stuff was wicked expensive, so it didn't matter. AppleTalk handled the network transport, and AFP was a part of that.
Sometime before OS 9 came out, Apple moved the AFP part to TCP/IP. AppleTalk was still available, mostly because of the legions of people who had old printers that only had AppleTalk (I know I was one of them until March of this year, when my LaserWriter Pro 600 gave up the ghost). If I had to guess I'd guess it's been almost ten years since they moved to AFP over TCP/IP. Certainly it was before OS 9.
If you want to try connecting to the Windows Server via AppleTalk, you can try changing the URL in the dialog you get when you use the Finder's "Connect to Server..." menu item. I think, if I remember correctly, it takes this form:
<pre class="command">afp://at/serveraddress:*/</pre>
If that doesn't work, then take out one "/" after "afp:".
charlie

What exactly is a shared hyperlink destination?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for