What Items Does It Make Senses NOT to Back Up?
I've been muddling through with Time Capsule, having some successes (thanks, in part, to this forum) and some failures. (It's amazing how much information one has to discover on one's on and through others.)
I know one way to cut down on the initial backup time is to exclude some folders and files.
Which items does it make sense NOT to back up? For example, is it pointless to back up System files? Applications? Libraries?
If I somehow lost all files on my desktop's hard drive, what would be essential to have as backups on the Time Capsule?
Some other examples of large monolithic files that aren't great candidates to have Time Machine backup are:
Certain mail apps - not Apple Mail, but Eudora, Entourage, Thunderbird?? store mail in large mailbox files so every incoming, every delete, changes the entire mailbox and the whole thing gets backed up.
Certain photo apps. like Adobe Lightroom and IView maintain large catalog files that change every time you do anything - then the whole thing gets backed up. (I don't know about the inner workings of Aperture or iPhoto so I can;t comment on them)
You do want to back these things up, and while Time Machine will work with then, they chew up space very quickly. Probably better to make/update copies of these files periodically.
There is a valuable App - [Time Tracker|www.charlessoft/TimeTracker.zip].
It is useful, particularly when getting started, or anytime it looks like some backup is unusually large.
It will tell you for each backup exactly what was backed up and how much space was required for each drive, folders within drive, files within folders etc....
It will enable you to determine if there is something being backed up that was large which you didn't realize, or identify things you don't want it to backup etc.
Similar Messages
-
When using cloud backup, what files does it make sense not to back up?
I have signed up with Zipcloud for cloud back up of files (after both time capsule and seagate external drives failed on me).
It's been a few days and I am very frustrated by what was not explained before I signed up, such as upload times, etc.
I ask my question about what files it might make sense not to back up to the cloud, because at the rate of backing up 4-8 GB a day (which is what Ziplcoud says to expect) it will take 3 months to back up all my data! Seems crazy.
Also, although I have been told by Zipcloud that there software will not interfere with my computer's performance, my experience is to the contrary. Coincidence? Wondering about the experience of others in terms of impact on computer's performance?
I welcome general opiions and experiences with cloud backup as well as the answers to my specific questions. I also am open to suggestions of reliable affordable back-up companies with support.
Zipcloud's email based support could not be much more frustrating! I send a question that doesn't really get addressed with my original question dropped from the reply so that I need to repeat my question—each answer coming from a different customer service person, no continuity within the same issue, no real resolution.
Is cloud back up really worth it?? And back to my original question, for which files and for which files not to bother.
Thanks,
Ani
PS. Final question: have people found data recovery problematic from cloud backup?
I have a MAcbook Pro OSX 10.8.5Methodologies to protect your valuable data. Backups vs. Archives. Long-term data protection approaches
Cloud based storage should not be considered a data archive due to security concerns, and the transient ephemeral nature of cloud storage which can only be quasi-possessed.
There is no such thing as "cloud storage"........ Cloud storage just means 1000s of HD in a building
5. *The above leads to another question, which is for how long to trust an external drive?
Given the second law of thermodynamics, any and all current mfg. HD will, under perfect storage conditions tend themselves to depolarization and a point will be reached, even if the HD mechanism is perfect, that the ferromagnetic read/write surface of the platter inside the HD will entropy to the point of no return for data extraction.
HD life varies, but barring mechanical failure, 3-8 years typically.
Some advantages of a cloned hard drive:
If you do an option key startup at boot you can directly boot to your cloned drive externally and operate from same like normal.
Sandboxing: With the help of the Cloned Drive, you can perform sandboxing, or the testing of new software, their updates and applications before they are installed on your Mac system. Moreover, if there are issues with the system, you can troubleshoot them by booting off the Clone. Many people test new APPS or experiment with a secondary clone and never worry about a failure or serious issue since the internal HD is untouched and the secondary clone can be wiped afterwards if any major issue occurs in testing. This is an invaluable tool in many instances.
If you sell you computer for purchase of a new one, you can take the clone you have on hand and install same or clone it to the new internal drive of your new Mac.
As it turns out one of the huge positive benefits of a clone is that people were seeing faster HD speeds; with APPS booting up from the clone than they had seen with the internal HD. The cloning applications in cloning the drive defragments the data to the clone and remove the “holes” in the cloning process.
With a small portable HD clone you can take your ‘computer’ anywhere to most any other current Mac and boot from your HD clone and have your entire system and its data immediately there for use. In case one is across the world and their macbook gets stolen, or damaged, with another Mac you can be up and 100% in the time it takes to boot to the new or borrowed Mac!
You can clone from your external clone to the internal HD/SSD in case of corruption.
The best thing that can be said, ideally, when your HD crashes with all its data is “so what, I’ve got a clone right here” and you can return to normal operation within seconds (by booting from the clone) or minutes (by swapping drives).
In separating out your system hub (OS) and your data hub, and storing them separately, is if you make only periodic clones (every month or so), and have a HD crash, the worst case outcome is that what is lost on your clone are some bookmarks and preferences since your data hub containing your vital files is constantly archived separately as it should be. -
Clean install of Lion and Time Machine Backup: Does it make sense?
Hello everybody,
I have updated from Snow Leopard to Lion over the App Store and now my iMac (the 27" one from last year) seems to suffer from several slowdowns. Quite unusual for a new Mac. So I decided to try a clean install. Of course I would like to keep my data, my programs and stuff. I am doing daily backups with my Time Machine, so this should not be a problem.
But thats my question: Does it make sense to put back all data from the Time Machine from a backup on a clean install? Doesn`t it possibly put back all the old problems with all the slowdowns I experience right now?
The following I intend to do:
- backup all data with Time Machine
- create a Lion install disc
- boot from the disc, delete the HDD
- install Lion from the disc
- boot the new OS and put back the Time Machine backup
I hope someone can verify that this would work. Since those slowdowns became really annoying I would give it a try.
greetings
Michaelthe_whispering wrote:
So I decided to try a clean install.
I'd recommend against starting with the "nuclear" option.
First, is there a "pattern"? Does the problem seem to coincide with any particular app(s)?
How full is your internal HD? If it's over about 85%, that can contribute to slowness.
Check for directory damage, by Verifying your internal HD, per #6 in Using Disk Utility.
Check for unusual log messages that can indicate a problem. See the tan box in OSX Log Files to locate your system.log, then the blue box there to decipher it, especially the Other Problems section.
If you suspect a problem with your installation of OSX, download and install the "combo" update, per Installing the"combo" update and/or Reinstalling OSX.
If that doesn't help, try installing a fresh version of OSX (that won't disturb anything else), per the same article.
The following I intend to do:
- backup all data with Time Machine
- create a Lion install disc
- boot from the disc, delete the HDD
- install Lion from the disc
- boot the new OS and put back the Time Machine backup
If you want to restore everything from your Time Machine backup, all you have to do is start up from your Recovery HD and do the restore. That will erase the HD and copy everything, including OSX, from the backups. Thus, it's unlikely to help, unless you had unrepaired directory problems.
Or, after you install Lion, use Setup Assistant to transfer everything except OSX from your backups. See Using Setup Assistant on Lion. Functionally, that's pretty close to just installing a fresh copy of Lion as above. -
GW2012 move: Does it make sense to move users to a new PO?
Moving from GW8 on OES-NW to GW2012 on OES11: Does it make sense to create new post office and move users?
We have a medium size GroupWise 8 system with a single post office holding less than 600 user accounts, 128 resources and 77 distribution lists.
Due to politics we also have a non-GroupWise external domain that contains a non-GroupWise external post office with a large number of "users".
The post office is on the primary domain.
3 secondary domains hold a GWIA and two web access agents.
I've never been real clear where the external stuff exists...
One of the web access gateways resides on an OES11 server.
The other webaccess agent and the GWIA are on OES-NW servers.
All reside in NSS volumes.
Given the lack support for NSS volumes on Linux servers by most backup applications (including mine), I've pretty much determined that it makes sense to move my GW system to EXT3 volumes.
Even if I change backup software and stick with NSS, and even though all my data is stored on SAN arrays, from what I've read on the forums and from Danita's books, it's preferable to copy your GW system files to a new NSS volume, as opposed to just re-attaching the OES-NW LUN to the new OES11 server.
Point being, whatever I do will involve copying the entire system via dbcopy and at some point, will also involve shutting down the existing domain and PO for the last phase of the copying process.
So..., I'm contemplating the following scenario:
Create a new OES11 server with EXT3 volumes sufficient for holding my GroupWise system.
Create new GroupWise 8 domain on the server.
Promote the new domain to primary and upgrade this new domain to GroupWise 2012.
Once the new domain is upgraded, create new GW2012 post office on new server/primary domain and migrate the users, resources and distribution lists to the new post office.
In the past I've had an additional post office and had migrated a about 20-25 users to that post office.
It wasn't a terrible process, and fortunately, I didn't run into any problems with the migration of those users.
When I re-consolidated my system, moving them back was also problem free
On the pro side:
No downtime of entire system
Relatively simple
Any issues in the migration process would be user-specific and would not effect the entire system.
On the con side:
Process could take far longer, since you can't move a lot of users simultaneously.
In addition, we have a small group of users with anywhere from 40,000 to 80,000 email in their account, so I'd have to factor that into haw many users I migrate at one time.
The chance of running into a stalled migration, for whatever reason, is probably much higher than running into a problem with moving the domain and PO via dbcopy.
The unknown factors for me and my level of experience:
It's been a while since I've had multiple post offices, so I don't recall what changes the users might see with regard to distribution lists, web access or external email.Originally Posted by gathagan
Moving from GW8 on OES-NW to GW2012 on OES11: Does it make sense to create new post office and move users?
Is there any reason you think that warrants to do so?
If the system is performing normally I'd opt to stick to upgrading the current setup as is.
I'm also curious, are you intending to upgrade to 2014 after the 2012 upgrade?
Originally Posted by gathagan
The post office is on the primary domain.
3 secondary domains hold a GWIA and two web access agents.
I've never been real clear where the external stuff exists...
Ok, that setup makes the upgrade easier. As you will start the upgrade with the primary holding the PO's... the PO's can be upgraded right after or during the domain upgrade (depending on if the MTA and POA are running on the same server).
That means you don't have to think about upgraded webaccess/GWIA connectivity issues with a lower PO version.
The external stuff are simply configurations found in the existing GroupWise domain databases. Or do you mean where those connected systems actually run?
Originally Posted by gathagan
One of the web access gateways resides on an OES11 server.
The other webaccess agent and the GWIA are on OES-NW servers.
All reside in NSS volumes.
And the primary Domain and PO are also still on NetWare (version 6.5 SP8 I presume), correct?
Originally Posted by gathagan
Given the lack support for NSS volumes on Linux servers by most backup applications (including mine), I've pretty much determined that it makes sense to move my GW system to EXT3 volumes.
Which backup application is that? With GroupWise op Linux not much NSS support is needed IMO.... as long as the files get backed up properly other metadata (rights, ownerships, etc) is irrelevant.
As for EXT3 vs NSS, when dealing with OES I always choose NSS. But that's me.
Another option could be to use XFS instead of ext3. That does perform much better, but has to be noted that it is more prone to file corruption in unexpected power loss situations.
With ext3, watch out for the scheduled filesystem check cycles at boot, that is one thing I really dislike about ext3 as disabling that check completely is not recommended and it means at least once a year the system will take an extensive amount of time to complete a (re)boot due to the check running on the ext3 filesystem. That usually pops up on you when you are not counting on it and "just quickly" want to reboot the server in a patching routine or other.
Originally Posted by gathagan
Even if I change backup software and stick with NSS, and even though all my data is stored on SAN arrays, from what I've read on the forums and from Danita's books, it's preferable to copy your GW system files to a new NSS volume, as opposed to just re-attaching the OES-NW LUN to the new OES11 server.
Yes, it's always good if you can start with a clean volume when transitioning from NetWare to OES.
Depending on how long you can afford to have the system down during upgrade, you can also choose the route of moving the NetWare LUN to the new OES server. Adding a second new LUN to the OES server with the needed size and initializing it with a new NSS volume and then just simply do a volume to volume copy using the cp of rsync command. As it's on the same server that can go quite quickly within an acceptable maintenance window to complete all move/upgrade steps.
Originally Posted by gathagan
Point being, whatever I do will involve copying the entire system via dbcopy and at some point, will also involve shutting down the existing domain and PO for the last phase of the copying process.
Sure, though you don't necessarily have to use dbcopy... depending on what you are planning to do. An offline copy won't require it for example.
How much data are we talking about (in GB's)?
Originally Posted by gathagan
So..., I'm contemplating the following scenario:
Create a new OES11 server with EXT3 volumes sufficient for holding my GroupWise system.
Create new GroupWise 8 domain on the server.
Promote the new domain to primary and upgrade this new domain to GroupWise 2012.
Once the new domain is upgraded, create new GW2012 post office on new server/primary domain and migrate the users, resources and distribution lists to the new post office.
If you really want to move users.... sure. I'd again opt for upgrading the existing system.
Also, it's a good rule to have the PO's running the same GroupWise version and patchlevel before commencing user moves. Moves between PO's with a different GroupWise version can lead to issues.
Originally Posted by gathagan
In the past I've had an additional post office and had migrated a about 20-25 users to that post office.
It wasn't a terrible process, and fortunately, I didn't run into any problems with the migration of those users.
When I re-consolidated my system, moving them back was also problem free
If you would want to move users, for whatever reason, I'd opt to first upgrade to the latest version first, then move. There have been many enhancements and bugfixes made in the move procedure over these last couple of years.
Originally Posted by gathagan
On the pro side:
No downtime of entire system
Relatively simple
Any issues in the migration process would be user-specific and would not effect the entire system.
On the con side:
Process could take far longer, since you can't move a lot of users simultaneously.
In addition, we have a small group of users with anywhere from 40,000 to 80,000 email in their account, so I'd have to factor that into haw many users I migrate at one time.
The chance of running into a stalled migration, for whatever reason, is probably much higher than running into a problem with moving the domain and PO via dbcopy.
I prefer a system upgrade over moving users. The process of moving when dealing with 100+ users, requires more effort and there are always things that need attention for a portion of the users. Also things like mobile devices can require some extra attention after having moved an account for example.
True, problems during a system upgrade can potentially affect all users. That is a factor. From the many upgrades I've done that's rarely really been an issue and problems encountered during an upgrade did not cause too much delay. Just make sure you always have a good full backup handy so you can reverse the upgrade if ever needed.
Originally Posted by gathagan
The unknown factors for me and my level of experience:
It's been a while since I've had multiple post offices, so I don't recall what changes the users might see with regard to distribution lists, web access or external email.
If by this you are referring to user moves and address book visibility between PO's, that should not be different to what users are seeing now. At least, the default is that within a GroupWise system all is visible throughout the system. If you have specifically set GroupWise objects to Postoffice visibility... then that would be something to check.
Cheers,
Willem -
Pairing devices fails after install of osx 10.8.5.. It fails at my Iphone and Ipad touch during the pairing about 5 seconds after I confirm the 6 digit number. Does this make sense? Whats the fix? I am moderately computer literate. Thanks for considering this.
The following entry may indicate a failing harddrive, so doing backups and replacing the harddrive may be in order.
Disk Information:
TOSHIBA MK7559GSXF disk0 : (750,16 GB)
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Failing <-----------
A little bit about drive S.M.A.R.T. status:
"The most basic information that SMART provides is the SMART status. It provides only two values: "threshold not exceeded" and "threshold exceeded". Often these are represented as "drive OK" or "drive fail" respectively. A "threshold exceeded" value is intended to indicate that there is a relatively high probability that the drive will not be able to honor its specification in the future: that is, the drive is "about to fail". The predicted failure may be catastrophic or may be something as subtle as the inability to write to certain sectors, or perhaps slower performance than the manufacturer's declared minimum."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T. -
Does it makes sense to create an index on a column used for partitioning
I am new to using partitions along with index. Can someone help me with the situation below?
I have a table defined like below
CREATE TABLE FACT_MASTER
PERIODCODE NUMBER(8) NOT NULL,
PRODUCT_CD NUMBER(10) NOT NULL,
DPT_CD NUMBER(3),
FACT_VALUE1 NUMBER,
FACT_VALUE2 NUMBER,
FACT_VALUE3 NUMBER,
FACT_VALUE50 NUMBER
PARTITION BY RANGE (PERIODCODE)
partition P1 values less than (2002),
partition P2 values less than (2003),
partition P3 values less than (2004),
This table is partitioned by range on Period code.
In a select query on this table, period code and product code are being used. I am planning to create an index to boost the performance. Does it make sense to include the period code column also in the index? I am planning to create index only for the product code column. I am thinking that the partition itself will act like an index for periodcode. Can someone tell me if this is correct? I am using 10g.
Edited by: user6794035 on Jan 21, 2010 8:47 AM
Edited by: user6794035 on Jan 21, 2010 8:50 AMIn your scenario I think it's better not to create an index on PERIODCODE because this column probaly has a only few distinct values.
In other scenarios, when in the same partition there are many distinct values of the partitioning key, creating an index can be an advantage for query performances..
But it depends on the specific context...
Max
[My Italian Oracle blog|http://oracleitalia.wordpress.com/2010/01/17/supporto-di-xml-schema-in-oracle-xmldb/] -
Why do I have to convert t2i files to pro res in fcp x? What difference does it make ?
Hey Guys,
Just wondering why do I have to convert canon t2i files to prores in fcp x? What difference does it make ? I'm able to edit in fcpx the files that have just been imported diectly in. Does it cause any problems in export?
Thanks so much,
JamieI am not familiar with Canon files.
I assume that they are like AVCHD which are really designed only as a delivery format and not for editing.
Though they can be edited it is concidered better to convert them to ProRes 422 for editing.
Though nothing terrible will probably happen if you don't convert them, you are likely to get improved results and faster rendering of complex effects with the converted media.
The best thing is to do 2 very short (sub - 5 minute) identical test projects adding lots of effects etc. with both methods and then you will be able to determine which technique suits you. -
Currently my internal drive is out of space due to my Aperture files. I want to place Aperture on a external drive to work from verses in intnal drive. In addition, I want to back-up all my work to another external for safe keeping. Once I move aperture to the external, I want to delete it off my internal drive. Does this make sense to do? Pros / Cons....
It is common for people to move their Aperture, iPhoto, iTunes etc. files to an external drive when those files become too large to conveniently keep on the internal drive.
The best approach is probably to keep the applications (iPhoto, Aperture etc.) where they are now, but move the files (photos, music, videos etc.) to the external drive.
You should set up a process to regularly backup all the files from both the internal drive as well as the external drive you'll be using. Here are two approaches:
(1) Use Time Machine. You can configure Time Machine so that it backs up both the internal drive as well as the external drive, all to a third separate backup drive. This is done via the Options button in the Time Machine preference pane.
(2) You can use a "cloning" program, such as SuperDuper, Carbon Copy Cloner, to make complete copies of files on your internal drive and that external drive. One way to do this is to use a very large disk for the backups, and to partition it into two backup drives, making one dedicated to the internal, the other dedicated to the external.
Two separate types of backups are recommended. I use both (1) and (2) above, and I disconnect and shut down the clone type backups when not being used. That way a power failure or surge that might destroy the original disk(s) plus the Time Machine backup(s) would still not damage the backups made under (2).
Don't delete your original Aperture files until you have verified that they are working properly from the external drive AND you have made a backup of them. -
Does it make sense to mark an email messages that are in junk mail folder as junk
Hello,
I see that some of email messages that are in my junk mail folder are in different color and marked as junk. However, some emails in the folder are not marked as junk. Most of these unmarked emails are put there because of my rules. The question is: does it make sense to mark these messages (in junk email folder) as spam/junk manualy? Will email spam detection engine learn somethig from it?If the messages are really junk, then mark them as junk. That will help Mail detect similar messages as junk, even if your rules miss them.
If the messages are not junk, but you have set rules to junk them for some other reason, don't mark them as junk. If you do mark them, you may start missing other messages. -
I need to work on documents in both my iMac and air book. But I have to download document and them upload it, and when I upload it I can't open it unless I open it on my phone first. Yet changes made on phone appear straight away. Does this make sense????
On your Macs open System Preferences > iCloud
Deselect the box next to Documents & Data, then reselect that box then restart your Macs.
On the iPhone tap Settings > iCloud. Switch Documents & Data off then back on then reset the iPhone.
Hold the On/Off Sleep/Wake button and the Home button down at the same time for at least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
See if you can open the files now without opening on the iPhone first. -
When I installed Lion on my macbook, I lost some apps on my iPhone. Does that make sense?
When I updated my Macbook to LIon, I seemed to have lost apps on my iPhone. Does that make sense?
just re-download them.
-
Does it make sense to create a worker role for data access to DocumentDB?
Hi,
I'm building an ASP.NET MVC app that will run on Azure. I'm using DocumentDB as its back-end database.
Sometimes, I return multiple data sets from different collections that need to be "reorganized". I handle this using LINQ in my application code. Does it make sense then to put all my data access and manipulation code into a worker role that I
can call from my web application that will run as a web role?
The reason why I'm thinking this may be beneficial is that I could scale up my worker role to increase its data manipulation capacity.
On the other hand, in most cases, my web role has to wait for a response from the DAL before it can do anything -- meaning, I cannot handle data access asynchronously -- I'm wondering if worker role approach makes any sense. I think mostly, worker roles
are used for operations that can run asynchronously.
I'd appreciate your feedback on this.
Thanks, SamHi,
Worker role applications are background processing applications like Windows processes which run in the background. Applications hosted within worker roles can run asynchronous, we usually use worker role to do some long-running or perpetual tasks, and
use scale function to load balance the tasks. Based on your description, it seems that worker role is a good choice for you, please try it, if you have further issues, welcome to create new threads in our forum.
Best Regards,
Jambor
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey. -
Does it make sense to buy an iPod touch 5th gen. 64 gb with iOS 7 and upgrade it to iOS 8, or spend a few bucks more and buy one with iOS 8 already installed?
The iOS update us free so I would get the less expensive one.
If you are getting a used one make sure this is done before you purchase it. Otherwise it may still have the Activatin Lock on
Find My iPhone Activation Lock
Apple's new iCloud tool can show if a used iPhone is stolen -
Does it make sense to create more than one repository of the same type?
Hi guys!
Does it make sense to create more than one repository of the same type? Let's say 2 CM repositories?
Thanx for answer!
PeterHi Peter,
yes, that makes sense. If you want to use different combinations of repository services you need different repositories. Or if you want to include existing data (e.g. file systems) from different locations. Or if you need to use different backup strategies (RDBMS, file), or ...
BTW, my KM Installation (NW04 SPS9) has <b>23</b> CM repositories by default.
HTH,
Carsten
Message was edited by:
Carsten Buechert -
Does it make sense to put in new 4gb of Ram in an early 2008 iMac
It seems that my 2008 iMac is running slow after I made my last upgrade to ML. I am thinking of putting in 2 2gb memory cards. However, my Ram now is supposed to already be 4gb. Does doing this make any sense?
I tried to do what you said but now see new Etrecheck. I am not very computer literate and feel like I have hit a stone wall.
EtreCheck version: 2.1.2 (105)
Report generated December 13, 2014 2:56:22 PM EST
Hardware Information: ℹ️
iMac (20-inch, Early 2008) (Verified)
iMac - model: iMac8,1
1 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo CPU: 2-core
2 GB RAM
BANK 0/DIMM0
1 GB DDR2 SDRAM 800 MHz ok
BANK 1/DIMM1
1 GB DDR2 SDRAM 800 MHz ok
Bluetooth: Old - Handoff/Airdrop2 not supported
Wireless: en1: 802.11 a/b/g/n
Video Information: ℹ️
ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro - VRAM: 256 MB
iMac 1680 x 1050
System Software: ℹ️
OS X 10.8.5 (12F45) - Uptime: 4:6:24
Disk Information: ℹ️
Hitachi HDP725032GLA380 disk0 : (320.07 GB)
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
disk0s1 (disk0s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / : 319.21 GB (149.66 GB free)
Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted> [Recovery]: 650 MB
USB Information: ℹ️
SanDisk ImageMate 9 in 1 Reader/Writer
Western Digital External HDD 400.09 GB
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
disk1s1 (disk1s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
ext storage (disk1s2) /Volumes/ext storage : 399.74 GB (197.53 GB free)
Apple Inc. Built-in iSight
Apple, Inc. Keyboard Hub
Apple, Inc Apple Keyboard
Mitsumi Electric Apple Optical USB Mouse
Apple Inc. BRCM2046 Hub
Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
Firewire Information: ℹ️
LaCie Hard Drive Quadra 800mbit - 800mbit max
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
disk2s1 (disk2s1) <not mounted> : 32 KB
LaCie (disk2s3) /Volumes/LaCie : 1.00 TB (18.34 GB free)
Gatekeeper: ℹ️
Mac App Store and identified developers
Problem System Launch Agents: ℹ️
[failed] com.apple.AirPlayUIAgent.plist [Details]
Problem System Launch Daemons: ℹ️
[failed] com.apple.wdhelper.plist [Details]
Launch Agents: ℹ️
[invalid?] com.support.com.peruser.Nexusd.plist [Support]
[invalid?] com.support.com.peruser.Nexussrvd.plist [Support]
Launch Daemons: ℹ️
[loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist [Support]
[failed] com.vmware.launchd.vmware.plist [Support]
User Launch Agents: ℹ️
[loaded] com.adobe.ARM.[...].plist [Support]
[invalid?] com.citrixonline.GoToMeeting.G2MUpdate.plist [Support]
User Login Items: ℹ️
None
Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
JavaAppletPlugin: Version: 14.9.0 - SDK 10.7 Check version
FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 15.0.0.246 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.1
AdobePDFViewerNPAPI: Version: 11.0.10 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
AdobePDFViewer: Version: 11.0.10 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
CANONiMAGEGATEWAYDL: Version: 3.2.0.1 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
Flash Player: Version: 15.0.0.246 - SDK 10.6 Mismatch! Adobe recommends 16.0.0.235
Silverlight: Version: 5.0.61118.0 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
iPhotoPhotocast: Version: 7.0
Safari Extensions: ℹ️
DailyBibleGuide
3rd Party Preference Panes: ℹ️
Flash Player [Support]
MacFUSE [Support]
Time Machine: ℹ️
Skip System Files: NO
Auto backup: YES
Destinations:
LaCie [Local]
Total size: 1.00 TB
Total number of backups: 190
Oldest backup: 2011-03-25 14:01:41 +0000
Last backup: 2014-12-13 19:35:53 +0000
Size of backup disk: Excellent
Backup size 1.00 TB > (Disk size 0 B X 3)
Top Processes by CPU: ℹ️
3% mds
1% WindowServer
0% WebProcess
0% fontd
0% Mail
Top Processes by Memory: ℹ️
322 MB WebProcess
155 MB mds
94 MB AdobeReader
90 MB Mail
84 MB Finder
Virtual Memory Information: ℹ️
209 MB Free RAM
870 MB Active RAM
743 MB Inactive RAM
324 MB Wired RAM
981 MB Page-ins
47 MB Page-outs
Diagnostics Information: ℹ️
Dec 13, 2014, 10:50:33 AM Self test - passed
Now what do I do?? Sorry to be so bothersome.
Maybe you are looking for
-
SSO is not working - User is missing credentials for connecting to alias
Dear Experts, I am facing a strange problem in SSO with reference system user mapping. I have configured reference system user mapping for accessing R/3 for ESS/MSS and transactional iviews along with UWL. The SSO was configured 2 months ago and wa
-
Fill a field at the btadmini context node
Hi experts Iu2019ve to fill the field ZZCURVAMAT at the btadmini context node when I put a product in the order item. Iu2019m trying to fill that field in the get_ordered_prod method with the code below: CALL METHOD lr_entity->if_bol_bo_property_acce
-
Problems installing Adobe CS6 master suite
I am having trouble installing software from Adobe on my mac. I purchased it directly from Adobe and when I try to install it, it claims it is not a legit copy. Does anyone have any suggestions to get it to install? Also, I have the installation CD.
-
While trying to purchase an app from the app store "contact iTunes support to complete transaction" flagged up. What can I do to correct problem?
-
Wireless was working and it has stopped
I have a WRT54G model wireless router. I've been using my wireless for about a month now on my macintosh Powerbook. On Friday, it lost it's connection and now tells me there was an "error accessing the wireless network linksys." If I go through Netwo