What next after upgrade from 9i to 10g

Hi I have successfuly upgraded my test db from 9i to 10g. what next now.
how do i go about uninstalling 9i binaries???
khurana

Khurana wrote:
Hi Satish
OS ie OEL 4 and i manually upgraded my db on 9i to 10g.Just get rid of the 9i home (assuming you don't have anything running from that home) and clean up the entries in oratab that refer to the 9i home.
On a side note, you might want to make a backup before you delete old 9i home.
Refer this link for more information.
http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/misc/ManualOracleUninstall.php#UNIX

Similar Messages

Sorting issue after upgrade from 9i to 10g

Dear all,
It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
Thanks for your help,
M.T.

903714 wrote:
Dear all,
It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
Thanks for your help,
M.T. This is expected behavior in 10g. Oracle will not order the dataset for you unless and until you explicitly specify it.
So without using order by clause in 10g, oracle doesn't guarantee that rows will be ordered.
To go back to old behavior like 9i, you can set a workaround by
alter session set "_newsort_enabled"=false;
Also see MOS - Order Of Data Retrieval Differs after upgrading 9i To 10g [ID 456707.1]

The optimizer changed after upgrade from 8i to 10g

I have upgraded my Oracle database from 8i (8.1.7.3) to 10g (10.2.0.3). After upgraded, there's some SQLs are with performance issue that the response time is very slow. The SQL can run very fast (around 1 seconde) in the pre-upgrade environment. Also, after generating the execution plan, there's different from the original enivronment (8i) which the query using some full table scan instead of index scan originally used in 8i.
The optimizer_mode of 8i is RULE and it's CHOOSE when upgraded.
My questions are:
1. Do I have any init.ora parameters setting in 10g environment which differ from 8i?
2. What method of analyzing tables is appropriate to use in 10g? Will this affect the performance like my case?
Thanks,
Wai

Please have a look to following threads:
Re: Optimizer Statistics collection after upgrade from 8i to 10R2
Re: DB upgrade from oracle 8.1.7 to oracle 10.2.0.2

Tag not being created after upgrade from 9i to 10g

We're upgrading from 9i to 10g - about time - and we've hit some "unexpected behaviour".
If I run
    SELECT xmlelement("TestMsg",
                    XMLFOREST(m.tx_id   "MsgNum",
                              m.tx_type "MsgTyp"
                              ) MESSAGE -- this is the alias for the XMLFOREST item
                    ) ut_xml
    FROM (select 1 tx_id, 'test' tx_type from dual) mon my 9.2.0.4 database I get
<TestMsg>
<MESSAGE>
    <MsgNum>1</MsgNum>
    <MsgTyp>test</MsgTyp>
</MESSAGE>
</TestMsg>- an extra tag is created based on the alias of the XMLFOREST item.
on my 10.2.0.4 database I get
<TestMsg>
<MsgNum>1</MsgNum>
<MsgTyp>test</MsgTyp>
</TestMsg>no MESSAGE tag.
Some of the XML parsing we have is taking account of this MESSAGE tag and hence is now breaking.
I guess my question is whether we've messed up the install of XMLDB or whether the 9i behaviour was incorrect and we should amend the parsing to the 10g behaviour.

Behavior change...?
SELECT xmlelement("TestMsg",
                    xmlelement("MESSAGE",
                    XMLFOREST(m.tx_id   "MsgNum",
                              m.tx_type "MsgTyp"
                    )) ut_xml
FROM (select 1 tx_id, 'test' tx_type from dual) m
will give output in 10.2.0.4.0 EE
UT_XML
<TestMsg>
   <MESSAGE>
      <MsgNum>1</MsgNum>
      <MsgTyp>test</MsgTyp>
   </MESSAGE>
</TestMsg>Edited by: Marco Gralike on Mar 29, 2011 1:07 PM

SQLException:Connection timed out- after upgrading from oracle9i to 10g

Hi,
Recently we upgraded from oracle 9i to 10g.
We are using Oracle JDBC Driver version - 10.1.0.5.0 .
In the application, when RMI server starts, the connectionpool (developed using stack) will be filled with 10 instances of fresh connections.
After keeping the RMI server idle for some time ( >24 hours ) , the first transaction sent to the Database (using the connection instance popped out from stack(connectionpool) ) terminates with following exception and from the second transaction onwards everything works normally.
Exception------
java.sql.SQLException: Io exception: Connection timed out
at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:125)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:162)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:274)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CStatement.execute_for_describe(T4CStatement.java:443)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.execute_maybe_describe(OracleStatement.java:942)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CStatement.execute_maybe_describe(T4CStatement.java:463)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:1037)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.executeQuery(OracleStatement.java:1183)
at util.DatabaseManager.fetchData(DatabaseManager.java:255)
at util.TextRequestImpl.presentText(TextRequestImpl.java:105)
at util.TextRequestServer.presentText(TextRequestServer.java:146)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:261)
at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:148)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Transport.java:144)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(TCPTransport.java:460)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run(TCPTransport.java:701)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Io exception: Connection timed out
at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:125)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:162)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:274)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CStatement.execute_for_describe(T4CStatement.java:443)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.execute_maybe_describe(OracleStatement.java:942)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CStatement.execute_maybe_describe(T4CStatement.java:463)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:1037)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.executeQuery(OracleStatement.java:1183)
at util.DatabaseManager.fetchData(DatabaseManager.java:255)
... 13 more
If am connecting to oracle9i(with Oracle JDBC Driver version - 9.0.2.0.0) ,everything works fine.
Can anyone help me out to solve this issue?

I attempted several upgrades and we decided it was better to implement the content under 10g fresh rather than attempt an upgrade.
After 3-5 attempts through patching non of them provided us with re-produceable steps and we had different errors each time - mind you this was a few months back after initial release of upgrade patches.

Frequent Rebuild Requires After Upgrade from 9i to 10g

Hi Friends,
Recently we have upgraded our production database from 9i to 10g and after that the performance of certain queries degraded drastically. when we did a workaround of rebuilding the table and associated indexes for these queries, it performs as fast as 9i.
Can anybody clarify why the same query which was working very fine without rebuild in 9i requires a rebuild in 10g?
Please note that the tables involved in this query are very huge and a frequent rebuild is not a permanent solution for us :-)
Regards,
Savad

Pl identify which "10g" - there are two flavors. Pl also see these MOS Docs
10g Upgrade Companion (Doc ID 466181.1)
https://supporthtml.oracle.com/ep/faces/secure/km/DocumentDisplay.jspx?id=466181.1&h=Y
TESTING SQL PERFORMANCE IMPACT OF AN ORACLE 9i TO ORACLE DATABASE 10g RELEASE 2 UPGRADE WITH SQL PERFORMANCE ANALYZER (Doc ID 562899.1)
https://supporthtml.oracle.com/ep/faces/secure/km/DocumentDisplay.jspx?id=562899.1&h=Y
PERFORMANCE TUNING USING 10g ADVISORS AND MANAGEABILITY FEATURES (Doc ID 276103.1)
https://supporthtml.oracle.com/ep/faces/secure/km/DocumentDisplay.jspx?id=276103.1&h=Y
HTH
Srini

Enabling autoconfig on DB tier After upgrade from 9i to 10g

Environment: 11.5.10.2
Number of Nodes: 2
Node1: Db & Conc Manager
Node2: Admin, Forms,Reports, web
I have upgraded the Apps 11i database 9.2.0.6 to 10.2.0.4
Now I have to enable autoconfig on new DB home
1) I have generated appsutil.zip on node2 and moved to db node. I have unziped the file. However it does not have $ORACLE_HOME/appsutil/scripts directory and its scripts, what is the problem, why scripts are not generated?
2) Until now we do not have env file on db tier as autocofnig not yet run on new 10g home
So How we can create the contextfile & env file ?

John,
1) I have generated appsutil.zip on node2 and moved to db node. I have unziped the file. However it does not have $ORACLE_HOME/appsutil/scripts directory and its scripts, what is the problem, why scripts are not generated?Refer to Note: 377495.1 - How To Recreate the /appsutil/scripts/ directory
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=377495.1
2) Until now we do not have env file on db tier as autocofnig not yet run on new 10g home
So How we can create the contextfile & env file ?Copy the env files from the 9i ORACLE_HOME to the 10g ORACLE_HOME and edit it manually (Or set the environment variables manually), then generate the database context file by running "perl adbldxml.pl" as explained in the note referenced above.

Invalid synonyms in PUBLIC after upgrade from 9i to 10g

We just did a conversion from Oracle 9i to 10g on our databases, and now I'm getting a warning in the enterprise manager database control that I have 1753 invalid objects in the PUBLIC schema. I drilled down and it looks like its all SYNONYMS. Not sure quite how to resolve it.. I looked via Toad and I dont see anything invalid..
For our upgrade we did an EXP, removed the databases and uninstalled Oracle 9i then installed Oracle 10g, recreated the blank database and imported the database in. We're using Oracle 10.1.0.5 on Windows Server 2005
can anyone help with this?
Thanks

So you decided to go for the export/import, then the synonyms you found should't have to do with SYS or SYSTEM since you were supposed to load only the specific production schema objects.
Besides running the utlrp script as previously posted, I suggest you to issue this query to find out whose the owner of the invalid objects:
select owner, object_type, count(*)
from dba_objects
where status != 'VALID'
group by owner, object_type
/And if possible post the command used to perform the import process.
~ Madrid

Query Performance problem after upgrade from 8i to 10g

Following query takes longer time in 10g.
SELECT LIC_ID,FSCL_YR,KEY_NME,CRTE_TME_STMP,REMT_AMT,UNASGN_AMT,BAD_CK_IND,CSH_RCPT_PARTY_ID,csh_rcpt_id,REC_TYP,XENT_ID,CLNT_CDE,BTCH_CSH_STA,file_nbr,
lic_nbr,TAX_NBR,ASGN_AMT FROM (
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS*/
cpty.lic_id,
cpty.clnt_cde,
cpty.csh_rcpt_party_id,
cpty.csh_rcpt_id,
cpty.rec_typ,
cpty.xent_id,
cr.fscl_yr,
cbh.btch_csh_sta,
nam.key_nme,
lic.file_nbr,
lic.lic_nbr,
cr.crte_tme_stmp,
cr.remt_amt,
cr.unasgn_amt,
ee.tax_nbr,
cr.asgn_amt,
cr.bad_ck_ind
FROM lic lic
,csh_rcpt_party cpty
,name nam
,xent ee
,csh_rcpt cr
,csh_btch_hdr cbh
WHERE 1 = 1
AND ee.xent_id = nam.xent_id
AND cbh.btch_id = cr.btch_id
AND cr.csh_rcpt_id = cpty.csh_rcpt_id
AND ee.xent_id = cpty.xent_id
AND cpty.lic_id = lic.lic_id(+)
AND (cpty.clnt_cde IN ( SELECT clnt_cde
FROM clnt
START WITH clnt_cde = '4006'
CONNECT BY PRIOR clnt_cde_prnt = clnt_cde)
OR cpty.clnt_cde IS NULL)
AND nam.cur_nme_ind = 'Y'
AND nam.ent_nme_typ = 'P' AND nam.key_nme LIKE 'WHITE%')
order by lic_id
Explain Plan in 8i
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=HINT: FIRST_ROWS (Cost=17 Card=1
Bytes=107)
1 0 FILTER
2 1 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=17 Card=1 Bytes=107)
3 2 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=15 Card=1 Bytes=101)
4 3 NESTED LOOPS (OUTER) (Cost=13 Card=1 Bytes=73)
5 4 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=11 Card=1 Bytes=60)
6 5 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=6 Card=1 Bytes=35)
7 6 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'NAME_WBSRCH1_I' (NON-UN
IQUE) (Cost=4 Card=1 Bytes=26)
8 6 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'XENT' (Cost=
2 Card=4649627 Bytes=41846643)
9 8 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'EE_PK' (UNIQUE) (Cos
t=1 Card=4649627)
10 5 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CSH_RCPT_PARTY
' (Cost=5 Card=442076 Bytes=11051900)
11 10 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'CPTY_EE_FK_I' (NON-UNIQ
UE) (Cost=2 Card=442076)
12 4 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'LIC' (Cost=2 Car
d=3254422 Bytes=42307486)
13 12 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'LIC_PK' (UNIQUE) (Cost=1
Card=3254422)
14 3 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CSH_RCPT' (Cost=2
Card=6811443 Bytes=190720404)
15 14 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CR_PK' (UNIQUE) (Cost=1 Ca
rd=6811443)
16 2 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CSH_BTCH_HDR' (Cost=
2 Card=454314 Bytes=2725884)
17 16 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CBH_PK' (UNIQUE) (Cost=1 Car
d=454314)
18 1 FILTER
19 18 CONNECT BY
20 19 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CLNT_PK' (UNIQUE) (Cost=1 Ca
rd=1 Bytes=4)
21 19 TABLE ACCESS (BY USER ROWID) OF 'CLNT'
22 19 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CLNT' (Cost=2 Card
=1 Bytes=7)
23 22 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CLNT_PK' (UNIQUE) (Cost=1
Card=1)
Explain Plan in 10g
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=HINT: FIRST_ROWS (Cost=19 Card=1
Bytes=112)
1 0 SORT (ORDER BY) (Cost=19 Card=1 Bytes=112)
2 1 FILTER
3 2 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=18 Card=1 Bytes=112)
4 3 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=16 Card=1 Bytes=106)
5 4 NESTED LOOPS (OUTER) (Cost=14 Card=1 Bytes=78)
6 5 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=12 Card=1 Bytes=65)
7 6 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=6 Card=1 Bytes=34)
8 7 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'NAME_WBSRCH1_I' (INDE
X) (Cost=4 Card=1 Bytes=25)
9 7 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'XENT' (TAB
LE) (Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=9)
10 9 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'EE_PK' (INDEX (UNI
QUE)) (Cost=1 Card=1)
11 6 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CSH_RCPT_PAR
TY' (TABLE) (Cost=6 Card=1 Bytes=31)
12 11 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'CPTY_EE_FK_I' (INDEX)
(Cost=2 Card=4)
13 5 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'LIC' (TABLE) (
Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=13)
14 13 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'LIC_PK' (INDEX (UNIQUE
)) (Cost=1 Card=1)
15 4 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CSH_RCPT' (TABLE
) (Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=28)
16 15 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CR_PK' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
(Cost=1 Card=1)
17 3 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CSH_BTCH_HDR' (TAB
LE) (Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=6)
18 17 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CBH_PK' (INDEX (UNIQUE)) (
Cost=1 Card=1)
19 2 FILTER
20 19 CONNECT BY (WITH FILTERING)
21 20 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CLNT' (TABLE) (C
ost=2 Card=1 Bytes=15)
22 21 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CLNT_PK' (INDEX (UNIQUE)
) (Cost=1 Card=1)
23 20 NESTED LOOPS
24 23 BUFFER (SORT)
25 24 CONNECT BY PUMP
26 23 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'CLNT' (TABLE)
(Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=7)
27 26 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'CLNT_PK' (INDEX (UNIQU
E)) (Cost=1 Card=1)
28 20 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'CLNT' (TABLE) (Cost=5 Card
=541 Bytes=5951)
Explain plan looks different in steps 19 to 28. I am not sure why 10g have more steps

Hi
I have no experience in 8i. I do know 10g does costing different from 8i. So I think the other plan might got elliminated.
Normally when I see differences. I just collect statistics on the tables and the indexes and remove the hints. Hints are not good . This has helped me to solve few problems.
Thanks
CT

After upgrade from 10.2.0.1 to 10.2.0.4 enterprise manager not working

after upgrade from 10.2.0.1 to 10.2.0.4
on windows enterprise manager is not working
Edited by: 830525 on Mar 24, 2012 9:44 AM

F:\Documents and Settings\hakem>emctl start dbconsole
Oracle Enterprise Manager 10g Database Control Release 10.2.0.4.0
Copyright (c) 1996, 2007 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
https://M1C3:1158/em/console/aboutApplication
Starting Oracle Enterprise Manager 10g Database Control ...The OracleDBConsoleor
cl service is starting..........................................................
The OracleDBConsoleorcl service could not be started.
A service specific error occurred: 1.
More help is available by typing NET HELPMSG 3547.
F:\Documents and Settings\hakem>NET HELPMSG 3547
A service specific error occurred: ***.
EXPLANATION
A service-specific error occurred.
ACTION
Refer to the Help or documentation for that service to determine the problem.
that's what happen while trying to start db console

Lost Developer Toolbar after upgrade from 4.1 to 4.2

After upgrading from 4.1 to 4.2.1.00.08, we have lost the Developer Toolbar.
Have others run into this with the upgrade or fresh installation of 4.2.1?
If so, what suggestions are there for fixing, short of reinstallation mentioned in this other thread:
{message:id=10692572}
Following the guidance there to look at the instance ID and other preference settings, I compared our three instances. The two that are not having the problem are both at 4.2.0.00.27.
Here are the preferences that exist on our other instances but are null on the problem instance:
APEX_4_1_0_PATCH_12920544
APEX_4_2_0_PATCH_14777994
APP_EXPORT_TO_DB_ENABLED
HPROF_DIRECTORY
INSTANCE_ID
MOBILE_DEVELOPMENT_ENABLED
PRINT_SVR_HOST
PRINT_SVR_PORT
PRINT_SVR_SCRIPTI have asked our support team to review the upgrade log. Re-installation from scratch is an option.
Any advice is welcome.
Skip

Thanks, Joel.
You inspired me to take a closer look, and look beyond the upgrade.
After the upgrade, my application passed a superficial checkout. Later, I exported my application and in the export file, the Instance ID was not NULL. I had not noticed any problems with how APEX was working.
The problems of the missing Developer Toolbar, Instance ID = NULL, and a new one, did not occur until I removed my application and tested a clean installation of the workspace and application. This is the sequence of events. The immediate triggering cause is clearly one of the following:
1. Deinstall application (ID 820) from APEX 4.2.1.00.08 instance, running 11g (11.1.0.7.0).
2. Remove workspace (PVA_AH9_R12)
3. (drop the parsing schema, xxpva, and related tablespace)
4. (create tablespace and schema user, xxpva)
5. Import workspace (PVA_AH9_R12) from an APEX 4.2.0.00.27 instance.
6. Import application (ID 820) including supporting objects from an APEX 4.2.0.00.27 instance, running 11g (11.2.0.1.0).
The next day I noticed the Developer Toolbar missing problem, and found that Instance ID is NULL.
Also, after Exporting an application in Database format, I cannot download the file from the Export Repository. When I click the filename link, I get 'Access Denied' instead of the normal download dialog.
Does this suggest anything else I should look into?
Do you think I should post this as a new problem/question with more detail about the sequence of events?
Skip

Upgrading from 9i to 10g on OS X?

Has anybody successfully upgraded from 9i to 10g on OS X?
I am stuck with Mac OS X 10.2.6 Jaguar for the next several weeks until I can upgrade to 10.3.4 Panther. According to the Oracle 10g on OS/X Oracle Installation Errata Information and Tools ( see http://www.crispdata.com/oracle_osx/ ), 10.3.4 is required for 10g installation.
In the meantime, I would prefer to experiment with 9i to learn more about Oracle database technology, and then upgrade to 10g after upgrading the OS to 10.3.4.
Has anybody already done this? Is this feasible?
-- Benjamin L. Russell
[email protected] (previously OTN Member, Since: Jul, 2000--just created new OTN account because of change in e-mail address)

Would it be sufficient to just set the passwords to expired? In this case generated the needed statements on your source DB and apply them on your destination DB, i.e.
select 'alter user ' || username || ' password expire;' from dba_users where account_status like 'EXPIRED%';
You might also consider other status values. Possible values are
OPEN
EXPIRED
EXPIRED(GRACE)
LOCKED(TIMED)
LOCKED
EXPIRED & LOCKED(TIMED)
EXPIRED(GRACE) & LOCKED(TIMED)
EXPIRED & LOCKED
EXPIRED(GRACE) & LOCKED
e.g.
select 'alter user ' || username || ' account lock;' from dba_users where account_status like '%LOCK%';

File- Export not working after upgrade from 11i to R12

Hi,
File -> Export not working after upgrade from 11i to R12.1.3 in few systems. Can you please let me know what could be the issue.
If export record count more than 200 it is working fine in all the systems and if change the profile option "Export MIME type” value to ‘text/tab-separated-values’ from application/excel also it is wokring.
Thanks and Regards,
Jagadeesha

Enabled the FRD. Below are few last lines. Can you please let me know what i can in this log file contents.
In Argument 1 - Type: String Value: global.frd_debug
Executing GET_ITEM_PROPERTY/FIELD_CHARACTERISTIC Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: Integer Value: 196613
In Argument 1 - Type: Number Value: 54
Out Argument 0 - Type: String Value: 12
Executing COPY Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: String Value: Entering app_menu.set_prop.
In Argument 1 - Type: String Value: global.frd_debug
Executing FIND_MENU_ITEM Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: String Value: FILE.EXPORT
Out Argument 0 - Type: Integer Value: 19
Executing GET_MENU_ITEM_PROPERTY Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: Integer Value: 19
In Argument 1 - Type: Number Value: 79
Out Argument 0 - Type: String Value: TRUE
Executing COPY Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: String Value: Completed app_menu.set_prop.
In Argument 1 - Type: String Value: global.frd_debug
Executing COPY Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: String Value: Completed app_synch.menu_toolbar_sync. Event is WHEN-NEW-ITEM-INSTANCE.
In Argument 1 - Type: String Value: global.frd_debug
Executing NAME_IN Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: String Value: GLOBAL.APP_CUSTOM_MODE
Out Argument 0 - Type: String Value: NORMAL
Executing NAME_IN Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: String Value: GLOBAL.APP_CUSTOM_MODE
Out Argument 0 - Type: String Value: NORMAL
Executing COPY Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: String Value: NULL
In Argument 1 - Type: String Value: GLOBAL.OUT
Executing USER_EXIT Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: String Value: FND GETPROFILE NAME="UPK_RECORDING_ENABLED" FIELD="GLOBAL.OUT" N
FNDCPVCM, 11, Built-In, Entry, 316509814, USER_EXIT
FNDCPVCM, 11, Built-In, Exit, 316509814, USER_EXIT
Executing NAME_IN Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: String Value: GLOBAL.OUT
Out Argument 0 - Type: String Value: N
Executing NAME_IN Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: String Value: system.current_form
Out Argument 0 - Type: String Value: FNDCPVCM
Executing NAME_IN Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: String Value: system.current_block
Out Argument 0 - Type: String Value: MASTER
Executing NAME_IN Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: String Value: system.current_form
Out Argument 0 - Type: String Value: FNDCPVCM
Executing NAME_IN Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: String Value: system.current_block
Out Argument 0 - Type: String Value: MASTER
Executing GET_APPLICATION_PROPERTY Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: Number Value: 75
Out Argument 0 - Type: String Value: IHR40P
Executing COPY Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: String Value: Completed call_all_libraries. Event is WHEN-NEW-ITEM-INSTANCE.
In Argument 1 - Type: String Value: global.frd_debug
Executing COPY Built-in:
In Argument 0 - Type: String Value: Completed app_standard.event. Event is WHEN-NEW-ITEM-INSTANCE.
In Argument 1 - Type: String Value: global.frd_debug
FNDCPVCM, 10, Prog Unit, Exit, 316509814, /FNDCPVCM-3/P45_30_DEC_201223_28_33
FNDCPVCM, 9, Trigger, Exit, 316509814, WHEN-NEW-ITEM-INSTANCE
FNDCPVCM, 8, Prog Unit, Exit, 316509814, /DMU-4/P8_30_DEC_201223_23_12
# 15 - FNDCPVCM:MASTER.USER_CONCURRENT_QUEUE_NAME.1359399301498413820
WINDOW FNDCPVCM PROGRESS_INDICATOR RESIZE 4198 1500 3
# 16 - FNDCPVCM:MASTER.USER_CONCURRENT_QUEUE_NAME.1359399301512613925
WINDOW FNDCPVCM PROGRESS_INDICATOR RESIZE 4198 1500 3

Report upgraded from 6i to 10g not displaying data.

Hi,
I upgraded one report from 6i to 10g,
When I'm running the report for the same set of data.
After changing the layout for few fields in the subframe.
first time it has shown the data in the report output but now same report with same data is not displying the output.
I'm sure this is due to some layout problem.(may be due to upgradation from 6i to 10g)
Please guide me to resolve this problem.

Hello,
How do you execute your Reports ?
Do you execute it from the Builder ?
If you execute it from the Builder, do you use Run Web Layout or Run Paper Layout ?
(If you have upgraded a Reports From 6i, there is no web layout , so you have to use the Run paper Layout
The web layout is something new that appeared in Reports 9.0.2)
Regard

After upgrading from Win 8 to 8.1 my DVD RAM GT80N SATA Drive is no longer working

After upgrading from Win 8 to 8.1 my DVD RAM GT80N SATA Drive is no longer recognizing discs. When I first put a disc in the drive runs for a bit and then stops. I've tried updating the driver but it says it has the most current driver. Under manage, it does not show any error codes and it says it is working correctly. I've looked at the regedit and it does not have any of upper and lower filters. I've tried disabling, rebooting, and reenabling. What am I missing? Another issue I've had since upgrading is that my network adapter needs reset several times a day in order to remain connected to wifi.

Hey hvbnfrgvn,
Thank you for the information on your HP Pavilion g7-2270us Notebook PC.
I suggest following the steps in this document for Drive Cannot Read Discs (Windows 8).
If your CD/DVD Drive Is Not Detected (Windows 8), follow the steps in this document.
I hope this information helps, please keep me posted on how it goes.
Best of luck and have a great day!
I worked on behalf of HP.

What next after upgrade from 9i to 10g

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for