What to buy for best PC performance?

I am running the Creative Suite on a PC Windows XP Pro platform and it has been very, very slow. The specifications I purchased far exceed that Adobe says are the needed specs.
Can anyone give me guidance on what to run so as to not spend my time twiddling my thumbs while I create PDFs, package files and save them?
Thank you.

Danette,
I am squarely with ID. awe on additional physical HDDs. CS, and on, can take advatange of all the Scratch Disk space that you can offer it. With HDD costs being as low as they are, I'd fill your case (and your SATA controller) with all that it can handle.
Let's say that you go with a setup like my workstation. Your setup would then be your OS and programs ONLY on you C:\. D:\ would be your assets (your basic image files), E:\ would be Scratch Disk, F:\ would be Scratch Disk, G:\ would be Scratch Disk.
Now, this is in a perfect world. I've got 4.5TB internal, all as fast as I could get, with 30TB of FW-800 externals for archives and more assets.
You might wish to experiment with the Windows' Virtual Memory. I found that my fastes setting was to split this between the C:\ (where it really, really wanted to be) and D:\. I played with several settings, and found that manually allocating the Paged Memory (Virtual) to 2.5x the physical RAM (I'm running 4GB w/ the 3GB switch, on XP-Pro SP-2), gave me the most speed.
That system screams with PS, AI, InD, Premiere and Encore. I often have all of these open at the same time, and my processor is just a single Duo-Core 3.2GHz. It was not that long ago, that I handled triple-truck images at 300 dpi on my old workstation with dual Xenon 1GHz CPUs and 1.5GB RAM. However, I had 4 SCSI 160 72GB discs (gosh, they seemed so big back then... ) through an Adaptec controller. It still sees some use and is not slow, even with W2K SP-4 on it.
If you do go the new box route, think about your ultimate I/O system first, lots of RAM next, then a good, solid single (or dual) Core 2 Quad. First, you can never have enough RAM for really big images, so you WILL use your Scratch Discs. The RAM will help, in any case, so get all that your MoBo & OS can accommodate. Your CPU will come into play more for Filters, and some of the processes like Rotation, etc., plus will aid with the OS end of things. Your choice of video card will be predicated on two things: do you use 3-D? Will you likely move up to CS4, especially the Extended version?
Since I do a lot of video on the system, plus some 3-D, I went for overkill on the video card. One day, I hope to really put it through its paces.
Last, get a case with great cooling, and enough room to allow for expansion, then, add more fans. Liquid cooling has come a long way, and you might want to consider it. Get the biggest and best power supply available, with big honking fans in it/them. Since I do a lot of video rendering, the cooling is super critical to me. With PS, it's a bit less so, but still something that you want to "over-engineer" on.
Remember, you can never have too much HDD space, too much RAM, too cool a case, or too much wine in your cellar!
Still, your system should work far better, than you indicate that it does. Going back three workstations, speed was never a concern for me. Yeah, faster would be better, but I started PS back when a 1GB HDD was US$1000 and you could only run one! I had to Save to tape, because I did not have the space to Save to disc. Run Gaussian Blur, Save to tape, make a pot of coffee, drink the entire pot, then make sure PS was still up and running.
For some speed increase, you might want to look into running processes on your system. For video work, which is horribly system stressing, I use a freeware program, EndItAll2, to eliminate any unnecessary processes, before I crank up Premiere. If it's just at PS session, I don't usually bother. You might want to look into similar, to see if you can gain some of the speed back. Also, defrag every night.
Hunt

Similar Messages

  • What does Apple mean by "For best battery performance, leave your device connected to a power source until the restore is complete."

    I just recently returned an IPad air and exchanged it for another. I first set up this new one as a new IPad but then deleted all content and settings right away (since I wasn't getting the progress I had made in apps and games) in order to restore it from my previous IPad Air. I then checked after on how to backup via icloud and saw this line under the subtitle of how to restore from a backup, "For best battery performance, leave your device connected to a power source until the restore is complete." What does Apple mean by "for best battery performance"? Im just a bit worried of issues.
    p.s. And yes I did have it connected to the power. And the ios is the default ios for new IPad Airs.

    Welcome to the Apple Community.
    It only means you should restore whilst it is connected to a power supply, so that your battery doesn't go flat during the process.

  • Best Scheme For Capturing For Best MPE Performance?

    So let's say I'm still capturing from MiniDV tape @ 720p24. What's the best scheme for capturing for best MPE performance? I have a new HP Z800 with (so far) one i7 4-core with 12 gigs of ram and an Nvidia GeForce GTX285.
    [moved from the FAQ forum]

    You have to forgive me. I've been using Matrox RT.X2's for so long, I didn't realize there were no codec options when capturing from HDV tape, like there is with the RT.X2. So now I wonder how the MPE handles the playback of HDV captured footage.
    I'm anxious to see what my new HP Z800 with one i7 quad core, 12 gigs of ram and Nvidia GeForce GTX 285 can do with PPro CS5. I got it two months ago and haven't even turned it on, waiting for CS5.

  • I'd like to replace my hard drive.  How do I know what to buy for my 15-inch early 2008 MacBook Pro?

    I am out of room on my hard drive.  I'd like to get a new hard drive and restore my data to the new drive from Time Machine.  How do I know what kind of hard drive to buy for my 15-inch, early 2008 MacBook Pro?  Also, how hard is this to do? 

    I have changed HDDs several times on the old MBP.  Currently it has a Hitachi 500 GB HDD that came out of my new one.  My adage is that one cannot have too much storage and I think that the 1TB HDD is an excellent choice.  Not only do you get generous capacity, the performance should be (theoretically) comparable to a 750 GB 7200 rpm HDD.  I will be very surprised if there are compatibility problems.
    If you bought the HDD from OWC, you should have received Installation instructions.  If not, go to the OWC website and look at the video.  I actually downloaded it so that I could hand write the instructions down step by step.  Also check out iFixit website.  They have step by step instructions that may prove to be useful.
    Tools you need:  00 Phillips and #6 Torx Drivers (get good ones).   The instructions make mention of a plastic pry bar (spudger).  I use a stiff piece of plastic like a credit card.
    Tips to keep in mind:  Get a large open table space and place a large clean towel on it.  That will protect your MBP and when you drop a screw (and you will) it will not bounce far so you will not have to spend an hour looking for it.
    As you take out a set of screws, keep them together (I use wide masking tape.  The little screws will stick to it.)
    Keep the sets in sequence.  That will make reassembly much, much easier.
    The most difficult steps are removing the keyboard from the MBP body and removing the ribbon cable from the mother board.  In case of the former, work from the back (the display) to the front.  You will initially have to pry it up and then do a lot of jiggling to remove it.  Don't be too timid about it.  At the end of the ribbon cable there is a rectangular connector.  Use your credit card to remove it.  Just pry it off.
    The #6 Torx driver is used to take off the 4 mounting pins on the HDD and if I remember correctly there is another place where it is needed, specifically in the battery compartment ( I think).  If the instructions don't say so, keep that in mind and inspect the screw before you select the driver.
    Good luck and make sure that you don't have parts left over.
    Ciao.

  • What to buy for the pro Logic set up

    Here is the question I am new to working with computers to create music however I am a professional composer (meaning this is what I do for a living) I need advice on what I need to get started from nothing.
    1. what computer do I need to use Logic and make it work to its fullest.
    3. is there any other hardware or soft ware I need besides just the computer and Locic to make it work.
    2. I sometimes compose up to 60 different tracks at a time. I recently was working on a friends computer(G5 with logic pro) and it sometimes could not play all the tracks.
    3. most of the work I am getting into is creating soundtracks for cartoons and movies. I need a set up to help me compose. any suggestions would help.

    Well the basics are computer, extra RAM, software (logic), audio interface, MIDI interface, external hard drive, and monitors (speakers).
    The rest depends on how you compose and record. If you use lots of samples and soft synths then you'll need the external hard drive and extra RAM to store and run them. You can never have too much RAM. The fastest drives are SCSI drives but they are much more expensive than Firewire. I do notice a difference in response time but for me it's workable. The faster the drive spins, the faster it spits out your samples to the computer. You may also want to use this drive to record to.
    If you use sounds from MIDI keyboards or racks you may use less RAM but you'll need a beefier MIDI interface. Since you're doing film stuff one that can stripe SMPTE and sync is a plus. I only use a Roland JV2080 for MIDI so the single MIDI port on my DIGI002 is plenty.
    If you're mainly composing traditional orchestral scores then it may not be necessary to get the most super fast computer, especially if you have budget restrictions. For me, most of the need for the processing power comes from running plug-ins, like reverbs, or effects like vocoders, and that may not be stylistically appropriate for your music leaving you with processing room to spare. Although higher track counts use plenty of processor power too. Always go with the fastest computer you can afford.
    Just my two cents. Good luck.
    G4 Dual 1.8G   Mac OS X (10.4.4)  

  • Sun 74110 Unified Storage Share LUN settings for best database performance

    We have been having performance issues with our Sun storage boxes using iscsi. I want to know what the best LUN settings should be for Database and Log LUNs for Write Syncronous Bias and Write Caching should be for each LUN.
    Thanks,
    J

    I do not have any 7000 series storage but have you seen this Blueprint?
    [Configuring Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage Systems for Oracle|http://wikis.sun.com/display/BluePrints/Configuring+Sun+Storage+7000+Unified+Storage+Systems+for+Oracle+Databases]
    have a good weekend,
    Glen

  • Utilize memory for best apps performance

        Hi all,
    I have a system with 32 gb ram, which has ebs 11.5.10.2. apps & db tier installed on the same machine
    Currently I am on linux RHEL 4.2 OS (32 bit) so i am unable to allocate more tha 2gb of sga
    SQL> show sga
    Total System Global Area 2181038080 bytes
    Fixed Size                  1262840 bytes
    Variable Size             935463688 bytes
    Database Buffers         1228800000 bytes
    Redo Buffers               15511552 bytes
    $
    free -m
                 total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
    Mem:         32497      25140       7356          0        252      23380
    -/+ buffers/cache:       1507      30989
    Swap:         8189          0       8189
    I want to increase the overall performance by utilizing all the free memory available,
    can any one please suggest how to utilize the free & cached memory to increase the performance.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    there is a significant performance differnce in prod & dev envrionment. Please suggest
    Did you try running "Gather Schema statistics" from sysadmin responsibility and see if it help you. Check for Database alert log file and confirm the DB is in healthy state.
    But that being said, 32 bit OS installation with a 32 GB RAM availability is just a mere wastage of resource since you are not using the 28GB. I strongly recommend to move to 64 bit OS.
    Thanks &
    Best Regards,

  • Apple, Mac Pro, Amd vs Nvidia with cuda? Why, and what to buy for Premiere Pro?

    Mac Pro has dual Amd video cards installed, and does not offer Nvidia cards with Cuda in this line up, as far as I can tell. The iMacs offer nvidia cards which seem a better choice for Premiere Pro which uses the cuda rendering capabilities. Which would be best for Premiere Pro? The quad Mac Pro, or the top of the line iMac with double the ram, say 32gigs vs 16 in the Mac Pro?  Why did Apple put AMD cards in the Mac Pro line?

    jtopenshaw wrote:
    Why did Apple put AMD cards in the Mac Pro line?
    Apple believes that OpenCL, not CUDA, is the future of GPGPU computing.  CUDA is closed and proprietary to nVidia only.  OpenCL is, as the name says: open.
    As of the creation and planning of the Mac Pro, nVidia's GPUs were (and most of them still are) very poor performers when it comes to OpenCL.  I expect that, over time, nVidia will catch up to AMD regarding OpenCL.  But they're not quite there yet, across the board.
    Why are the GPUs in the iMac (and Macbook Pro) nVidia?  They make better and more efficient mobile GPUs at this point in time.  The GPU in the iMac is similar to the GPU in the Macbook Pro in that they're both mobile, not desktop GPUs.  AMD has a fairly poor representation in that market (so far), so Apple stuck with nVidia.
    It's likely that Apple doesn't see the iMac and Macbook Pro lineup as devices to be used for massive GPGPU processing.  The Mac Pro, on the other hand is where they see that being used heavily.  Perhaps when and if AMD decides to produce an efficient and powerful mobile GPU, Apple will cut (back) over to them.  But one can only guess, there.
    Ugio wrote:
    What I can tell you it's that the mixture between Mac Pro (2013) and the last Adobe Suite does not worth the money.
    That's fair and is your opinion.  I don't agree. :-)

  • What to buy for TurboTax

    Each year, I do my business taxes using TurboTax for Business. This is not for Schedule C companies, but for C and S - Corps that file the 1120 form. This version is only available for Windows computers.
    The last few years, I borrowed a PC. Before that, I used Virtual PC with Windows XP on a Quicksilver G4. (BTW, Ownership of XP with VPC is not considered upgradeable by MS)
    My current computer is a 2.6 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo MacBookPro.
    TurboTax requires:
    Processor: 450 MHz 32-bit (x86) or faster processor
    Operating Systems:
    Windows XP (32-bit and 64-bit) Home/Media Center Edition/Pro with Service Pack 2 or higher
    Windows Vista™ (32-bit and 64-bit) Home Basic/Home Premium/Business/Ultimate
    Windows 7
    Administrative rights required
    RAM: 256 MB (512 MB recommended)
    Other than this yearly use of TurboTax, I do not use Windows computers and therefore know very little about their operation (except for all the problems I hear my friends discuss). I went to the Windows 7 website and found many different versions but did not understand which of the variations are required. It appears that the$99 versions are only for people upgrading from an earlier version so I need to spend $200 of the "full" version, correct?
    I also found a "Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium Full" combo with "parallels Desktop for Mac 6 - OEM" on a third party website for $220. That seems like a lot just to do my Taxes. My understanding is Parallels lets you run both Windows and Mac OS at the same time and switch between the two, where BootCamp requires a restart to use the other operating system. Is that correct? Will my computer handle Parallels?
    I have also found stores (or individuals) who sell Windows XP for much less than Windows 7. Is this an OK (will it work and is it legal) way to proceed?
    I have also seen netbooks advertised for not too much more than the combo package or are used computers a viable option? (One advantage to these is either would add a new "surf the net" outlet to our household).
    What would you do?

    AJ,
    Thanks for your help. My accountant, as most others, charges around $1,500 for corporate taxes. That's a lot for a company like mine with no inventory and no depreciation. That's why I do them myself. However, I like using a program so you know that the math is correct, plus you can enter information as you find it instead of having to complete a certain form before doing a different one. Also, the programs usually include all of the forms you need so you don't have to download them or enter information manually.
    Many years ago, Intuit did have a Corporate Tax program for the Mac but discontinued it since they only sold 4000 copies. I am certain that none of their current Mac products include the 1120S for that I need to file.
    H&R Block's ±$80.00 individual program does include the 1010 form AND the 1120S form, but it is Windows only. I suppose if I purchased it instead of the Intuit products I could save about $80 but, while all of these products claim that you can import data from prior year's returns prepared with the competing product, I was burned once and had to do it all manually.
    The reason I asked about XP instead of Windows 7 is, besides saving some money, I thought it was well established and might be less buggy than the newer OS. Am I correct that the least expensive, home version of Windows 7 runs about $200 retail? you did say I can run Parallels. Will my processor run that with Windows 7 while I have OS 10.6 with Quicken and Safari running at the same time?

  • TC firmware 7.3.2 versus 7.4.1!  What's recommended for best connectivity?

    for some time now my internet connections drops for no apparent reason and then comes back on. These interruptions last anywhere from 3 sec to several minutes.
    I read somewhere that downgrading to Airport Utility firmware 7.3.2 helps.
    Other suggestions were:
    - deleting airport and internet related .plist files from the preferences folder.
    - delete a apple.airport.kext file from the Extensions folder.
    - switch channels in my 802.11 n (b/g) network.
    Nothing of the above changed for the better.
    here is what I gathered so far and tried myself based on numerous posts with people having similar problems:
    Airport Utility> Wireless options:
    - WPA Group Key timeout is set to 365 days,
    - I use "Interface Robustness) (both under "wireless options") .
    Under System preferences>Network settings:
    - IPv6 is turned off,
    - Airport is set on top of "service order.
    - I deleted all other networks except for the one I am using.
    Here is my basic set up:
    I am on 10.5.6 and use a 1TB 1. generation TC. Backups run normally but the wifi connection (just 5 feet of direct though 2 windows). I am connected wirelessly though a PPPoE connection
    Log in/ Start up items (under System Preferences>Accounts:)
    I don't have a Realplayer in my start up items (as suggested as a potential problem in one of the forums)
    can a change back to the older firmware help? or should I forget about the TC and reactivate my old and trusted 1. generation Airport Basestation?
    thanks in advance for any advice

    Thx Bob,
    I tried the downgrading to 7.3.2 and it did not help matters.
    I am not sure when or what exactly happened to make the TC act up.
    I might go back to the old Airport Basestation if I don't find a solution here in this forum.
    I talked to several Apple Care guys and had ISP folks check my modem.
    any other suggestions?
    thx

  • Finally upgrading to OS X on imac-dv G3-what to do for best results

    I finally decided to upgrade to OSX on my old trusty imac-dv crt, G3, 512 MB. I wiped the harddrive-after saving everything onto connected OSX tiger firewire drive-partitioned into (2) 6.3GB partitions. everything runs fine using the firewire as startup disk. imac is on ethernet network with mac mini. so where to begin: clone OS of external firewire onto imac? start fresh from 9.2.2, firmware update 4.2.1 and install tiger on partition? de-partition into one drive? --- I have disks for 9.2.2, disks for OS 10.1 never worked so well before. OSX 10.4 for imac mini (probably wouldn't install for this older system), wait for next OS for better OS? Its a sharp running little machine that has always been able to open humongous files with ease and I'd like opinions as to keep it clean and running smooth. Thanks.

    If everything runs from the Firewire drive as you want it to, you can startup from that drive and run Disk Utility from the external drive. You mention the need to "de-partition" so if you want to change the partitioning on the internal drive, use Disk Utility to do that first. Then use Disk Utility to "restore" that external drive partition onto the internal drive. You can also use Carbon Copy Cloner (or another utility) that has a better interface for doing a cloning operation, instead of Disk Utility.
    That would be the simpliest way to get Mac OS X on the iMac. For Mac OS 9, if it is not already on the external drive, you can start up from the installation CD you mentioned and do an installation. You can do this before or after putting Mac OS X on the drive. If you only plan to use Mac OS 9 under Mac OS X Classic, you should be able to copy an existing System Folder for another location, such as from the Mac mini (if it has one). If you want to be able to boot directly into Mac OS 9, it would be best to run the Mac OS 9 installer (to make sure you get the right "parts" for an iMac DV).
    If that Firewire drive does not have the installation you want for Mac OS X, please post back.

  • Question about what to buy for Pro Digital Photography

    I do quite a bit of digital photography with high-end digital backs, was wondering if there would be a significant difference in buying a Mac Pro versus the 2.8 extreme or the 2.4 Imac with an equivalent amount of ram, say 4 gigs. The cost would be greater off course going the Mac Pro route including monitor etc. and less portable. And the expandability issue, which really isn't a problem since I use quite a bit of external drives.
    Currently I'm using a first generation intel Imac 20' been having a few connection issues with the camera, not quite sure if it's software or hardware but still get good results with this machine.
    I have never used a Mac Pro for this application so not sure if there truly is a mind blowing difference.
    I like the portability of the Imac and the quick set up. Also I've heard some rumors about the glossy screen being an issue.
    Any comments would be appreciated.
    Much Thanks.
    .

    I am also doing digital photography, and am in need of a new machine. My old MDD G4, just can't cut it, especially dealing with RAW images from my D300. If you are using digital backs, I would say that the extra horsepower of a Mac Pro would greatly speed your workflow. Not knowing your workflow, I would still say that the internal expandability would help make keeping images orderly a snap. Say one 4-500 gig drive for unedited raw image storage, another for final edited image storage, and a third or a partition as a swap space for photoshop (Raptor?). You could use an external firewire drive as a backup drive with time-machine. Just a suggestion.
    As for a monitor, you get a Dell (I can't believe I said that) FPW2407 24" widescreen. They are just as good as the Apple Cinemas, but cost a lot less. With the cash you save, you can get a Spyder to calibrate it, if don't already have one.
    I am waiting for my taxes to come back before I get one. I waited and waited and waited till I could not waits no more, and got a new Nikon body. I am looking at the 8-core 3.0 with the Nvidia 8800. I can get the ram from OWC.
    As always, take everything I say with a salt-lick!
    Mack

  • What export format for best resolution and 4:3 aspect ratio

    Team,
    I am putting together a DVD for my son's hockey season. It is a mixture of Livetype stuff, imported DV clips (Not HD), and using a program called Photo To Movie for my photo montage's.
    I have about 2 mins of livetype stuff, and about 2 mins of an export from "Photo to movie" in iMovie DV (NTSC) format
    Now I'm doing a few dry runs to see if this newbie can get this to DVD using iDVD. Now when I burn it, and I play it on a standard DVD player on a standard 4:3 ratio TV, I'm seeing a black bar on the top and on the bottom.
    The only way I get those bars to go away is if I export from FCE in Streaming DV format (export using quicktime options and choosing DV Streaming (then imported into iDVD), but I'm feeling my quality is lower as a result. Am I off here? Is there a format that has high export quality .
    I'm new to mac, and am not accustomed to "Exporting" and "Importing" and maybe I'm screwing something up during those events. I just think my video quality may be suffering because I can only get DV Streaming to not have the black bars when burning with iDVD.
    Any advice would be appreciated asap.
    Thanks!

    I'm exporting from FCE and I then use it in iDVD. My brain is fried, and I may have not been clear on the following: I export from FCE using File => use quicktime conversions.
    Now when I export to straight-up Quicktime (not use quicktime filters), and then take that Quicktime file into iDVD it gives me a "Widescreen Preview" and when I take the next step and burn to DVD and play on a 4:3 aspect TV it comes out with the black bar on top and bottom (Which I believe is letterbox?)
    So that being said, I'm at a loss as to why there are letterboxes in iDVD.
    Thanks in advance.
    Message was edited by: Skatingskis
    I found something close. http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5924938&#5924938
    It appears they are going from "Photo to Movie" straight into iDVD and having a similar issue. The big difference is that I'm using FCE before I go to iDVD.

  • What camera settings for best viewin on ipod?

    I have the following settings: 4:3, 4608x3440 (16M) 488 frames
    3:2, 4608x3072 (14M) 546 frames
    16:9, 4608x2592 (12M) 646 frames
    4:3, 3264x2448 (8M) 958 frames
    16:9, 3072x1728 (5M) 1425 frames
    4:3, 2304x1728 (4M) 1878 frames
    16:9, 1920x1080 (2M) 3455 frames
    I have a fujifilm jx360, 16MP camera.
    I plan to put them in my 4th generation ipod touch and 1st gen iPhone.
    Thanks.

    It does not make any difference for the 4G iPod since iTunes optimizes the photos for the iPod, iPhone and iPad.  see:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1314

  • How do I figure what version OS X to buy for reboot disc?

    I bought a G4 Powerbook with superdrive on ebay last year, and earlier today ran the update to 10.4.7. After, I stupidly changed the username from the previous owner to my own while in the info window. Naturally, the old user was put back into the system folder/users and the new user with my name, lost all the preferences. I tried copying the old prefs over and really screwed up: I think I deleted the library folder or at least moved it to a stupid place. Now the machine won't boot at all--total kernel panic. The powerbook did not come with the original system discs, and I don't know what version I need to buy. I do have a iMac DV SE, but it won't burn discs so I have to buy a retail version to reboot. How do I figure out what to buy for my G4 Powerbook? Thnx

    Any retail version of Tiger will do. However, before doing that, check out the search results at http://discussions.apple.com/search.jspa?threadID=&q=%22renamehomefolder%22&objID=&dateRange=last90days&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=9 and maybe you can fix the problem.

Maybe you are looking for