What camera settings for best viewin on ipod?

I have the following settings: 4:3, 4608x3440 (16M) 488 frames
3:2, 4608x3072 (14M) 546 frames
16:9, 4608x2592 (12M) 646 frames
4:3, 3264x2448 (8M) 958 frames
16:9, 3072x1728 (5M) 1425 frames
4:3, 2304x1728 (4M) 1878 frames
16:9, 1920x1080 (2M) 3455 frames
I have a fujifilm jx360, 16MP camera.
I plan to put them in my 4th generation ipod touch and 1st gen iPhone.
Thanks.

It does not make any difference for the 4G iPod since iTunes optimizes the photos for the iPod, iPhone and iPad.  see:
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1314

Similar Messages

  • For my power shot S5IS, best camera settings for 4 X 6 prints?

    for my power shot S5IS, best camera settings for 4 X 6 prints? I would like to have the best setting so when i print out the photos,i do not need to crop or trim. It is close, but i feel it can be better.

    The bad news is that you can't do anything in camera to get that result. The good news is that once you understand the possibilities you'll appreciate being able to control how your prints get framed (cropped). Your camera produces images in a 3:4 ratio while a 4 X 6 is a 2:3 ratio so if you don't know in advance that you need to crop some from the top, bottom, or both to make your image fit the 2:3 ratio & frame too tightly when taking the photo you're in trouble. Learn to shoot in a way that allows cropping to match common print sizes, and find a simple editing program to crop in computer. This should be standard practice because even though you may want a 4 X 6 now down the road you might want a 5 X 7 so keep your options open. 
    If you don't have an editing program that easily does this & you're on a PC download Picasa which is an excellent program for this & it's free. Once you have it running select one of your existing photos, select "crop" from the menues on the first tab & then play around with the different options Picasa has built in to see the effects to your image. NOTE that it won't throw away the data outside the crop box even though it may look like it has. You always have the option to "undo crop". Once you get a result you like you "export"  & create a new file cropped as seen on screen WITHOUT modifying the original file.
    "A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought."

  • AVCHD - Blu-ray: what settings for best quality?

    Hi Folks,
    I've got a BD-burner and I want to export my edited HD avchd footage to BD with minimal quality loss.
    Can you please advice me on the right settings?
    * should I go for the 'Match Sequence Settings' option in the export menu?
    * or probably select 'MPEG 2 Blu-ray' option for best quality?
    * what is better in terms of quality of the outcome: 'MPEG 2 Blu-ray' vs. 'H.264 Blu-ray'?
    Finally, I have a question related to Adobe Encore: the same footage exported through Adobe Media Encoder in 'MPEG2 Blu-ray' (takes 13 GB), Adobe Encore reports will take only 8GB?!? I'm puzzled here. How come the same footage got exported into files with different length? Is there a way to set the Encore to export in the maximum possible quality? Where can I locate this menu setting?
    Thank you very much!

    Forgot to mention, I'm using CS5 and I shoot in avchd, 30fps,
    1980i

  • What Comp Settings are Best/Flexible for Animated Tutorials 4 Multiple Devices laptop, iPad, and TV?

    I'm making animated tutorials on a particular subject.  I will have these on a website and want them to be viewable on devices ranging from laptops to iPads to TV to iPhones.  I believe one approach to setting my Comp Settings for AE is to use a Preset like HDV/HDTV 720 which results in 1280x 720  pixels, 720 pixel resolution, square pixels, and a 16:9 ratio.  The advantage, as I understand it, is that it will work for HDTV and that, if I use something like YouTube, horizontal letterboxing will be the result in a 4:3 format (of course, with black lines top and bottom). 
    Unfortunately, this seems to make great sense if the content is, say, from video photography of scenes.  My content is animation and enough text at times to make me think horizontal letterboxing will make that text too small to read... that I will sacrifice some content and quite a bit of readability in such horizontally letterboxed setups.  Am I better off sticking with Comp settings at, say, a 4:3 ratio and accepting the "black pillars" on wide devices?  If so, what should my resolution be and what should the absolute width and absolute height be in pixels?  640x480? 1280x960? Something else?  My main concern hear is that I have enough pixels and resolution so that inages remain clear on TV.
    Anything you can enlighten me on here will be greatly appreciated.  Is there a great discussion/tutorial on this somewhere?  Because I'm having the growing creepy sensation that the more movies I make, the more "fixing" I'm going to be needing to do when I start up my website.  Please pull this thorn out of my paw!  Thanks in advance!
    I have a MacBook Pro with Snow Leopard... and CS5.5 Master Collection, so I have Media Encoder.  I'm also on Lynda.com every day.  So point me in the right direction and I'll attack.
    Road Quill

    Thanks Bogie san!  This is a big help to getting me started.  And the link got me a little farther into Media encoder as well as Group of Pictures, intra-frame, and inter-frame.
    One more related question... which will no doubt look simple (minded) but have an answer fraught with complexity. 
    If you were me (don't panic!), and you're making animated tutorials in AE with lots of illustration (some created in Illustrator and some in After Effects) and a significant amount of text from time to time (e.g., sometimes there are several boxes with, say, five English words in them, plus some drawings in the same frame with the boxes so that, although the frames are not cluttered, I also do not have the option of extremely large font sizes)...
    ...AND you believe most of your users will view from laptops, from LCD desktop monitors, and from iPads and the like (not iPhones so much)... with HDTV being something you view as an option it would be "just nice to have" though not necessary...
    ...what parameters would you choose when you set up your AE files? 
    As a straw example, lets say I select 640 x 480 (4/3 pixel ratio) because I think, rightly or wrongly, that would be good on YouTube.  Should I double each number, keeping the 4/3 ratio?  Do nothing?  Do something different?  What about pixel resolution?  Am I worrying about this too much?  
    And, yes, I did pay attention when you said, "That's not an After Effects topic."  I'm just not saavy enough yet to know what that really means.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Road Quill

  • Camera settings for making youtube videos

    I have a Canon 60D and CS4 master collection with Premiere Pro and Encore.  What settings should I shoot video at in order to get the best youtube output?    My choices are 1920x1080-30; 1920x1080-24; 1280x720-60; 640x480-60; crop-640-60

    Thanks Bill, that's a most honest answer.  I also found this tv segment to help in the camera settings.  http://tv.adobe.com/watch/shooting-and-editing-hdslr-video-using-adobe-tools/-setting-up-t he-camera-correctly-for-dslr-video/  This is most exciting challenge and a healthy switch from my traditional photo skills.
    Bob.

  • Can Bridge report in-camera settings for White Balance?

    No matter what settings I choose in Bridge Preferences, I cannot get it to tell me what was the White Balance (WB) setting of the camera when raw images were shot.
    This seems an odd omission because Camera Raw is passed this information and displays images correctly, although it doesn't report what WB value it was given, only that what you are viewing, prior to any editing, is the default "As Shot".
    I'm referring to raw files shot on my Canon 300D, Nikon D700 and Canon 5D Mark II.
    Currently I'm using PsCS6 (13.0.1.2 x64), Bridge CS6 (5.0.2.4 x64) and ACR 8.1 on a Windows 7 x64 8GB system, but the same omission existed on the same Windows system with ACR 7.x in CS6 and all releases of PsCS5, Bridge CS5 and ACR 6.6 and 6.7.
    On the opening dialog of Bridge Preferences, at the bottom you can choose whether or not you wish to 'Hide Empty Fields'. Selecting or unselecting this option does not have any effect upon Bridge's inability to report WB when, from within Bridge, you select File Info from the File menu or by hitting Ctrl + I.
    The only locations in Bridge Preferences I can find that need selection (and which I have selected) for Bridge to supply WB information upon invoking File Info are here:
    Preferences\Metadata\Camera Data (Exif)\White Balance; and
    Preferences\Metadata\Camera Raw\White Balance
    I have also selected Preferences\Metadata\File Properties\Supports XMP, and yet Bridge fails to give the in-camera WB in the Camera Data tab of File Info.
    I have been able to locate references to WB in the following tabs of File Info:
    File Info\Advanced, where there appears, under the sub-tab 'Exif Properties (http://ns.adobe.com/exif/1.0)', an entry such as 'exif:White Balance:1'; and
    File Info\Raw Data an entry such as '<exif:White Balance >1< /exif:White Balance>'.
    However, these are just code numbers, not names like 'Cloudy' or 'Shade', and they are not only inconsistent (both showing the code 1 for an unedited image I know was shot with Auto WB and another unedited image I know was shot with Flash WB) but also it would appear that the codes may refer to the WB as modified by ACR - because an image I know had its in-camera WB of Auto altered in ACR shows a code of 'Custom' rather than 0, 1 or some other number.
    So what am I missing? Does anyone know how to make Bridge Preferences display the in-camera setting for WB, and if so, under which tab of File Info do you look for the answer once you have set up Preferences properly?
    Message was edited by: Andrew_Hart
    Just corrected my current Photoshop version

    I'm afraid that you just haven't addressed the question that I asked in my original post.
    I still like to think I have but if you for whatever reason need this info showing in the metadata you probably be better of trying to alter it your self or find a way to address Paul personally (maybe via a private message).
    I have not heard from him for a long time and a small google search provided me with this forum post, hope it helps you, maybe you can also persuaded Paul to come back, he is very missed!
    http://www.ps-scripts.com/bb/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5508

  • What target settings for LCD monitor calibration?

    I have recently installed Spectraview II to calibrate my NEC LCD 2180WG monitor but have some doubts on which target settings to use as there are different opinions on color temp, gamma and intensity choices.
    I use my system purely for photo post-processing and printing on color calibrated printers. I use AdobeRGB color space and have no interest for processing images for web.
    - What color temp do you use/recommend? D50, D65 or something in between? I see that some folks use D65 and others swear by D50.
    - What about Gamma choice 1.8, 2.2 or L* ? Same here, no common choice here too.
    - Lastly what about intensity (brightness in terms of cd/mm2)?
    NEC recommends Target Settings for Printing, which are D50, 1.8 gamma and Max. Intensity, but I'm not sure.
    I'd appreciate if you could recommend correct settings for my type of work.
    Thank You

    Charles,
    I arrived at 5100K by measuring a few of my favorite printing papers with my spectrophotometer. This was a good compromise (most measured between about 4800K and 5300K). I confirmed the results by trying various calibrations them comparing the monitor to prints (using custom printer profiles). Anywhere near 5000K looked great, but 5100K was the best match of the bunch. I used 5000K lighting for viewing (Solux and Philips light sources).
    Luminance settings were done in a similar fashion. First I compared a ppure white Photoshop document (on the monitor) to the intensity of a sheet of white printing paper displayed under my viewing light. With the monitor luminance set to the 85 cd/m2 range, the two documents look about the same brightness of white. I try to view my prints under "moderate" light levels rahter than ultra bright levels, since I know they won't be lit by spot or flood lights when placed on a wall. If you do have spots on your hung prints, there is a case to use a higher luminance level on your monitor. Anyway, on many LCDs, if you set the luminance too high, your blacks can start to look a little washed out. When set to about 85 cd, my tonal range in the print is a great match to my monitor. If I have the monitor luminance set to 100 or higher, I find that my prints look dark and muddy in comparison (unless viewed under unrealistically bright lights). So, a lot of trial and error, plus some initial brightness comparisons.
    Gamma is a tougher one. I have a special viewing target that I bring up in Photoshop (Lab based to prevent any possible conversions). When viewed in Photoshop at full magnification, it helps me to set the gamma, which affects mostly the midtone density. On my LCD, I found )again by trial and error) that 2.0 gave me the best tonal distribution. My old CRT worked best at 1.8 gamma, and other LCDs sometimes work best at other gamma settings, such as 2.2.
    The above settings work beautifully given my equipment, my viewing levels, ambient working conditions, etc. My monitor to print match is excellent from both a color and tonal range standpoint. Hope that helps clarify my thinking and approach.
    Lou

  • Export settings for best quality for pages with letters etc.

    Hi, I am trying to make video of a musical piece, featuring the score of the piece with pages turning following the progression of the music. I made the video in Adobe After Effects CS5 and exported it so it would be lossless. The video itself is a .mov file and looks great when I view it in Quicktime, but when I import it into FCE the quality goes down a bit. I don't know if FCE is handling the clips correctly or if it's just for making it quicker to view. Any suggestions on export settings from FCE for best quality of a video of this nature, so that the notes are clearly readable.
    Thanks in advance
    Ps. It has to be in a format suitable for Youtube.

    Under "Sequence" and in "Settings" and in the tab "Render Control" I have: Frame Rate: 100% Resolution: 100%.
    If that is what you were referring to... but under the tab which is called RT and is located left of the timeline and left of the timecode. There I have checked : Safe RT, (Playback Video Quality) Dynamic, (Playback Frame Rate) High.
    There might be a way to import the clip in better quality (so it doesn't downgrade the quality).
    Was mostly trying to find out with the export but it might have something to do with this.
    Thanks

  • Nikon camera settings for an adobe only workflow

    If I use a Nikon D70, shoot raw, don't use Nikon nx, and want to import into Lightroom as dng--are there certain in-camera setting to use or avoid? Use to think only decision was whether to import as dng or nef. But if Nikon's in camera settings aren't accessible without nx, do you have to rethink all your camera settings just because you want to import into Lightroom as dng?
    Thank you,
    Tim

    I also just convert my NEF's to DNG on import. I tried some of the presets for import, but quickly realized that all of the photos on a memory card rarely need the same things. I would also argue that most people don't choose all the optimal settings in camera (hence the advantages of RAW).
    For this reason, I find my best workflow is to simply edit groups of pictures that are similar. So if I take a few pictures inside at a birthday party, I will spend a few minutes in the develop module changing my settings, and then I will simply sync, auto sync, or copy and paste all of my develop settings to the 10 other photos that have the same issues.
    One note on sharpening. It supposedly is set to a decent setting by default. Check out this article:
    http://www.oreillynet.com/digitalmedia/blog/2007/04/whats_with_the_number_25.html
    Doug

  • Workflow and settings for best quality .png export

    I need to export a vector image to a .png for use on Retina display devices. What is the workflow and settings for exporting that results in the best possible quality .png image?

    The workflow I used to produce the previously posted image on a WIndows 7 PC:
    File>Export>Set "Save As" type to PNG
    Upon pressing the "Save" button a PNG Options window will appear.
    Resolution: Screen (72 ppi)
    Anti-Aliasing: Type Optimized (Hinting)
    I contacted Adobe support and they told me that the only way to export .png is via "Export" or "Save For Web".
    "Save For Web" is designed to compress and I wanted to avoid that to ensure retina display quality.
    I chose 72 ppi instead of a higher setting (support suggested I use 300 ppi) because Apple retina displays do not recognize ppi above 72.
    The Anti-Aliasing setting was my default and I read somewhere that this was the best for getting crisp edges on retina displays (Sorry, I cant recall the source)
    My concerns are that the export and anti-aliasing make larger files and I'm not convinced they are noticably better quality than "Save For Web".
    Also, it's worth noting that the support was clearly reading from a reference guide. It was not a "real" expert that could explain the best workflow.

  • Book - best settings for best photo quality

    What are the best settings for my photos in order to get the best quality book?
    Thanks
    Zasa

    zasa:
    Use the largest file, pixel wise, that you can. The books are printed at 300 dpi so the largest size the better to insure you'll get as close to that dpi for the largest page picture possible.
    Do you Twango?
    TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
    I've written an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.

  • How to install Windows 7 in UEFI modeand what bios settings for D30

    How do you install windows 7 in UEFI mode and what bios settings do I need to install it on a D30 workstation.

    Not a ThinkStation guy, but FWIW, that can happen when installing Win 7 in UEFI mode when CSM support is not enabled in BIOS.
    Is CSM support - either explicit or by selecting "other OS" and turning UEFI back on as suggested above - an option?
    Z.
    The large print: please read the Community Participation Rules before posting. Include as much information as possible: model, machine type, operating system, and a descriptive subject line. Do not include personal information: serial number, telephone number, email address, etc.  The fine print: I do not work for, nor do I speak for Lenovo. Unsolicited private messages will be ignored. ... GeezBlog
    English Community   Deutsche Community   Comunidad en Español   Русскоязычное Сообщество

  • What Compressor Settings for the web?

    I have a 1min40 sequence with the Settings: PAL, Frame Size: 1280x720, 25fps, Compressor HDV720p25. What Compressor Settings would you recommend please:
    1) to put it in a website
    2) for Broadcast: would Apple ProRes HQ be a good choice?
    Thanks in advance.

    You can review the information first hand at youtube.com
    Or create a custom preset in Compressor:
    Name: YouTube sharing
    Description: H.264 video at 8 Mbps with AAC 44.1kHz audio
    File Extension: mov
    Estimated size: 3.6 GB/hour of source
    Audio Encoder
    AAC, Stereo (L R), 44.100 kHz
    Video Encoder
    Format: QT
    Width and Height: Up to 1280 x 720
    Pixel aspect ratio: Default
    Crop: None
    Padding: Preserve source aspect ratio
    (L: 0, T: 0, R: 0, B: 0)
    Frame rate: (100% of source)
    Frame Controls: Automatically selected: Off
    Codec Type: H.264
    Multi-pass: On, frame reorder: On
    Pixel depth: 24
    Spatial quality: 50
    Min. Spatial quality: 50
    Temporal quality: 50
    Min. temporal quality: 50
    Average data rate: 8 (Mbps)

  • RAW Native Camera Settings for Nikon - do they convert?

    Question on RAW processing in Lightroom. Can Lightroom show ALL of the the in-camera settings (WB, saturation, etc.) selected when the shot was taken? I prefer not to have to re-cook the RAW photos from scratch on every picture. Nikon NX2 provides this option (i.e. the RAW and JPEG can look identical as starting points on your screen) which I find helpful versus dealing with uncooked RAW images to start with each time. I am considering Lightroom for lots of other good reasons but this is a threshold issue for me due to time, etc.
    Would love to hear anyone's experience on this. I use a Nikon D80.
    Thanks much.
    Gary

    Robert,
    Specific camera settings,etc, are in fact stored in Nikon Nefs and can be read by NX2--or changed, if one wishes in NX2, but nowhere else, as has been stated.
    Eric,
    Presets, or profiles, may come close in some instances to reasonably good starting points for NEFs in LR2, so if that is all you need or use NX2 for, then your advice is reasonable.
    However, at this point in time, NX2 has some distinct advantages, most notably much more advanced and faster local corrections tools than LR2 and soft proofing, to name two.
    However, LR2 editing is integrated with a catalog database, and NX2 is browser based, and that may make LR2 worth the tradeoff for some users. Both, of course, offer non destructive editing.
    Each has it strengths and weaknesses, so I use both to take advantage of the unique tools each offers.

  • Special camera settings for green screen

    Are they any special camera settings when you shoot in Green Box???
    e.g. special white balance or special iris usage??

    What's a Green Box? (other than something that'll show up under my Christmas Tree sometime soon)
    Patrick

Maybe you are looking for

  • Vendor down payment process at the time final  payment

    Hi all MY scenario I posted in F-48 down payment of Rs 50000 and assigned invoice for Rs 89000 in F-54. While clearing I entered Rs 50000 against the Down Payment and posted. Now I am posting payment for the balance amount i.e. Rs 39000 in F-58. I se

  • IWeb can't find previous pages after transfer/reinstall

    I recently got a "new" (read: my husband's previous) MacBook Pro and lost some of my files/folders due to a problem during the transfer.  I had to reinstall iWeb and now it won't find the pages I had created and published previously with it.  The pag

  • Maintenance Certificate missed in license type

    Hello everyone, We are in the middle of the upgrade to our BW landscape from 3.5 to 7.01. After I upgraded our BWT system today and ready to apply support packages, as usual I go to apply maintenace certificate according to SAP's instruction on "How

  • Save For Web & Devices Not Responding

    Hi there, I am quite new to Photoshop so please be gentle I have created a multi layer image that is at 8bits per channel and when I go to Save For Web & Devices it brings up the display showing me the optimized version ... I then click on SAVE and i

  • Is there a screen capture tool in Photoshop Elements 9?

    Is there a screen capture tool to take a screen shot of a window in another application or of Web page?